Florida Roofing - April 2021 by Florida Roofing Magazine

Florida

April 2021

ROOFING A Publication of FRSA – Florida’s Association of Roofing Professionals

EAGLE ROOFING PRODUCTS A trusted partner in providing beautiful, durable, energy efficient concrete tile roofing systems.

Educational & Research Foundation

2021 Auction

Online July 16-23 Expo Floor July 22-23 Register and Bid by Texting ‘FRSA’ to 243725 or visit www.bidpal.net/frsa

Donate an Item Support Industry » Research » Education » Scholarships

"My long-term career objective is to own my own engineering company in Florida and to mentor high school students interested in the construction industry." — Cody Fowler FRSA Educational & Research Foundation 2020 recipient of a $2,000 scholarship

Donate an Item at www.bidpal.net/frsa/donate-item or contact John Hellein at 800-767-3772 ext. 123 or john@floridaroof.com

Florida

April 2021

ROOFING A Publication of FRSA – Florida’s Association of Roofing Professionals

Synthetic Underlayments: New ASTM Standard Replaces Felt Standards

Polyurethane Adhesives and Insulation

tio In n si Br de o c

Training, Codes, Legislation and Research are on FRSA’s Horizon

ve n

FRSA-TRI 6th Edition Tile Manual

SAVE ENERGY

BOOST PROFITS

The Self-Propelled Equipter RB4000 Dump Trailer www.equipter.com/rb4000

717-553-0675

Cover and above: University of Florida Griffin Floyd Hall by 2020 S.T.A.R. Award recipient Perry Roofing Contractors

Contents

FRSA-Florida Roofing Magazine Contacts:

12 | Synthetic Underlayments: New ASTM Standard Replaces Felt Standards 14 | Polyurethane Adhesives and Insulation 18 | Training, Codes, Legislation and Research are on FRSA’s Horizon

For advertising inquiries, contact: Kelsey O’Hearne at: kelsey@floridaroof.com (800) 767-3772 ext. 127 All feedback including Letters to the Editor and reprint permission requests (please include your full name, city and state) contact: Lisa Pate, Editor, at: lisapate@floridaroof.com (800) 767-3772 ext. 157 Florida Roofing Magazine, PO Box 4850 Winter Park, FL 32793-4850 View media kit at: www.floridaroof.com/ florida-roofing-magazine/

#RoofingProtects #HireSmart

26 | FRSA-TRI 6th Edition Tile Manual On the iPad

Florida

ROOFING Available Online at www.floridaroof.com/florida-roofing-magazine/

April 2021

Any material submitted for publication in Florida Roofing becomes the property of the publication. Statements of fact and opinion are the responsibility of the author(s) alone and do not imply an opinion or endorsement on the part of the officers or the membership of FRSA. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without permission from the publisher. Florida Roofing (VOL. 6, NO. 4), April 2021, (ISSN 0191-4618) is published monthly by FRSA, 3855 N. Econlockhatchee Trl., Orlando, FL 32817. Periodicals Postage paid at Orlando, FL. POSTMASTER: Please send address corrections (form 3579) to Florida Roofing, PO Box 4850, Winter Park, FL 32793-4850.

www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

Sunshine State Solution

Snap-Clad

Tite-Loc Plus Katie Seashole Pressly Stadium, FL GC: Scorpio

Installing contr.: Thorne Metal Systems

Owner: U of Florida Profile: Tite-Loc Plus

Architect: Walker Architects

Color: Terra Cotta Photo: hortonphotoinc.com

Equally strong and attractive, these metal roofing panels are available in Florida in our full line of PAC-CLAD painted steel, aluminum and Galvalume Plus coatings, ensuring that your roof will endure whatever comes its way. All panels are Miami-Dade County and Florida Building Code approved.

PAC-150

MIAMI DADE COUNTY

APPROVED

CASE STUDY @ PAC-CL AD.COM/SE ASHOLE 102 Northpoint Parkway, Acworth, GA 30102

P: 800 272 4482

F: 770 420 2533

PAC-CLAD.COM | INFO@PAC-CLAD.COM

FRSA LEGAL COUNSEL Cotney Attorneys & Consultants

Material Shortages and the Implied Warranty of Availability of Materials Trent Cotney, CEO, Cotney Attorneys & Consultants You may be familiar with the implied warranty of constructability. Under this legal doctrine, if you comply with the owner-supplied plans and specifications on a public project, you have an argument that you are not responsible for any loss or damage due to defective or insufficient plans. However, there is also limited support for what is known as the implied warranty of availability. COVID-19 has caused a variety of material shortages and price increases affecting lumber, steel and shingles. Recently, FRSA affiliate, RCASF issued a notice that foam used for tile installation was in short supply, delaying projects. As a result of these material shortages, contractors have had to adjust to delays and determine how to keep the customer happy despite the inability to obtain key materials needed for construction.

Material Specifications

In most cases, preferred materials are readily available for construction projects. However, there could be a project where an owner requires the use of a construction material that is difficult to locate or is available only from a single supplier. In this case, it could be reasonable to conclude that the owner implicitly warrants the specified material’s availability. Under the implied warranty of availability, if an owner specifies a material available only from one supplier or requests one supplier for a specialty or brand name material and that supplier cannot or will not provide the required material, then the owner’s specifications are defective. In this instance, it follows that the owner has broken the implied warranty of constructability and is therefore liable for any damages or expenses that the contractor encounters.

Constructability vs. Availability

Although the implied warranty of constructability and the implied warranty of availability are connected, there is a difference. The constructability warranty focuses on the accuracy of the plans and specifications, while the availability warranty concerns the commercial availability of specified materials. Per the implied warranty of availability, the owner warrants that the selected supplier can provide a specified construction material. The issue is further complicated by timeframe and price. Case law has narrowed the parameters of

the implied warranty of availability in this way: although the owner warrants commercial availability, the owner does not warrant that the supplier can provide the material for a specific price or in a timely fashion. In addition, this implied warranty pertains only to owner-selected suppliers or construction materials, not to materials or supplier selections that the contractor makes. If a contractor recommends using a specialty or brand-name material from a single supplier, the contractor is solely and entirely responsible for securing the material. Therefore, the contractor is liable for damages if the material is unavailable for the construction project.

Implied Warranty Case Law

The implied warranty of constructability was up for debate in two notable cases: US v. Spearin, 248 US 132 (1918) and Phillips Jordan v. State of Florida Department of Transportation, 602 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In the first case, a utility contractor named Spearin was under contract with the United States to build a dry dock for the Brooklyn Navy Yard and relocate a six-foot storm sewer at the site. The US government provided the plans and specifications, including the materials, dimensions and new location for the sewer. When the sewer later failed, it was discovered that the city plans were inaccurate, but the government claimed that Spearin was at fault and therefore responsible for repairing the sewer. Spearin stated that the government should change the sewer design and make the repairs or pay him to fix it. The government refused those terms, terminated the contract, revised the sewer design and hired another contractor to complete the job. Spearin then sued the US government, claiming wrongful termination and seeking money owed for the work he had performed, along with profits for the unperformed work. The Court of Claims ruled in Spearin’s favor. The case was appealed and then heard www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

by the US Supreme Court, which upheld the decision and created the Spearin Doctrine. The Supreme Court stated that a contractor is obligated to complete a project according to the specifications that the owner provides and is not liable for problems resulting from inaccurate plans. In contrast, in the second case, Phillips and Jordan were hired by the Florida Department of Transportation (DOT) to build a fence along I-75 In Brevard County. After the project was completed, Phillips and Jordan requested additional payment since they had to clear and grub more land than specified in the contract. The DOT refused and Phillips and Jordan filed suit. The court ruled for the DOT, stating that the implied warranty of construction did not apply in this case, as Phillips and Jordan inspected the land in question before bidding on the project and should have been aware of the area and equipment requirements. As for the implied warranty of availability, the seminal case is Aerodex, Inc. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 344, 417, F.2d 1361 (1969). In that case, Aerodex won a bid to provide missile systems for the government. Per the bid proposal and contract documents, the contractor was required to obtain a brand-name version of a missile system component from a specific supplier. However, the component supplier refused to sell the part to the contractor. The court ruled in favor of Aerodex, stating that the government was responsible for assuring that the component was available or allowing the bidders to make a component duplication. The government breached the implied warranty

What’s Wrong with These Pictures?

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

of availability, so it was liable for the contractor’s damages. It is worth noting that the implied warranties identified herein are primarily used on public projects as evidenced by the cases above. However, it may be possible to make similar arguments using different theories on private projects.

Understanding Your Responsibilities

Before you bid on any construction project, make sure that you carefully read the material specifications and understand your related responsibility. If you have questions about a preferred brand or supplier, raise those issues before accepting a contract. We anticipate that price increases and material shortages will continue throughout 2021. Accounting for those issues contractually as well as maintaining an open line of communication with your suppliers is essential to avoid unnecessary delays or unexpected material price inflation.

FRM

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is for general educational information only. This information does not constitute legal advice, is not intended to constitute legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as legal advice for your specific factual pattern or situation. Trent Cotney is Board Certified in Construction Law by the Florida Bar, an advocate for the roofing industry and General Counsel of FRSA. For more information, contact the author at 866-303-5868 or go to www.cotneycl.com.

Offers 90-Day UV exposure

Split release liner for easy valley applications

Self-seals around roofing fasteners

Non-slip, cross-laminated traction surface

IT’S WHAT YOU WANT UNDERNEATH. Ultra HT Wind & Water Seal® high temp underlayment:

the best roof protection under the sun.

Rated for temperatures up to 250°F—Ultra HT is the premium high temperature, self-adhering underlayment engineered to take the heat of metal roofing systems. Discover the advantages of Ultra HT to protect your next roofing project. MFM Building Products – celebrating 60 years of service to the roofing industry!

Visit mfmbp.com for a free sample or call 800.882.7663 today.

Industry Updates Gulfeagle Supply Opens Two New Branches

Gulfeagle Supply has added two new branches to its growing footprint. Founded in 1973, Gulfeagle Supply is a full line distributor of residential and commercial roofing and building products. With these additions, the company has grown to over 80 locations across the United States. The San Antonio, Texas location is managed by Rick Zuniga who joins the Gulfeagle family with 16 years of experience in the industry and a legacy for treating his customers like family. Gulfeagle Supply also added a new South Florida branch in West Broward located just off Interstate 595. The West Broward location is fully stocked with residential and commercial roofing products. This branch is conveniently located with easy access for quick service and prompt pickup of material.

The Tile Roofing Industry Partners with The Business Side of Things

To further expand its services, outreach and social media presence, the Tile Roofing Industry Alliance (TRI Alliance) has announced a partnership with The Business Side of Things based in Los Angeles, Calif. Reagan Campbell, founder and CEO of The Business Side of Things, brings her growing marketing and social media expertise and network contacts to help grow the TRI Alliance brand and organization. “We’re excited to start our relationship with our new partner, Reagan Campbell, and welcome her as part of our TRI Alliance team,” said Rick Olson, President of the Tile Roofing Industry Alliance. “She will bring new and innovative industry expertise and experience through her social media work with manufacturers and other associations, which will be a powerful tool for us as we move forward.” “In a world where we live behind screens, human connection is crucial. I look forward to building a sense of community on the TRI Alliance social platforms through showcasing the professionals that make the industry great,” says Campbell about her new role with the TRI Alliance. Reagan Campbell is a graduate of Rollins College with a degree in Business Management and is passionate about helping businesses and individuals elevate their digital presence via social media. 8

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

Duro-Last, Inc. Announces Participation in Estimating Edge

Duro-Last is proud to announce their participation in Estimating Edge, the technology provider for The EDGE Estimator, a cloud-based estimating solution, and a jobsite project management app called EDGE On Site. “Duro-Last is committed to providing contractors with innovative, time-saving products and solutions for their business,” said Steve Ruth, Senior Vice President of Sales Operations. “Estimating Edge fits into this strategy for us by offering an easy-to-use tool that can not only help contractors bid Duro-Last projects more accurately and efficiently but manage the job site more effectively as well.” The EDGE software now comes pre-populated with the full catalog of Duro-Last products and pricing, including the flagship custom-fabricated Duro-Last membrane, roll good membrane options, metal edge accessories and details by Exceptional Metals, Duro-Guard Insulation solutions and roofing system accessories. With the click of a button, contractors can immediately start creating a new bid for their next Duro-Last project. Plus, updates to products and prices are easily managed by users, significantly reducing software maintenance. “The EDGE was developed by experienced industry professionals and top-tier programmers with the goal of helping contractors of all sizes estimate more efficiently and become more profitable,” said Adam Oaks, CEO of Estimating Edge. “We have spent decades in the field, so we understand the need for accurate and timely estimates. That’s why we set out to create a better solution and we’re excited to now bring that solution to Duro-Last contractors.”

Mule-Hide Products Co. Promotes Steven Litaker to Territory Manager

Mule-Hide Products Co. has promoted Steven Litaker to Territory Manager for the newly created West Central and Southwest Florida territory. In his new role, Litaker will be the company’s lead contact with area contractors. He will help ensure projects are completed efficiently and according to specification. He will work with contractors and MuleHide Products parent company, ABC Supply Co. Inc., to develop the best solutions to meet property owners’ roofing needs. Litaker will also provide ongoing product, technical and sales training for contractors and ABC Supply Associates. Litaker had served Mule-Hide Products as Business Development Manager in Florida since December 2019. During that time, he was instrumental in growing the company’s liquid-applied roofing business

throughout the state. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he helped continue Mule-Hide Products’ education and training program by developing and presenting numerous online seminars for contractors and ABC Supply and Mule-Hide Products Associates. “Steven has lived his entire life in the roofing world and has been walking roofs nearly as long as he has been walking,” said John Pantesco, MuleHide Products Southeast and Southwest regional director. “His relentless hard work and his passion for the business have earned him the trust of our contractors, ABC Supply and his peers at Mule-Hide.” Litaker has a Bachelor of Science degree in biology and biological sciences from the University of South Carolina in Columbia. He will remain in the Tampa area.

and project management functionality with tools to support the roofing sales and production process, including estimating, photo-sharing, aerial measurements, material ordering and labor scheduling. “We are extremely excited about this new relationship between SRS and our family of brands with AccuLynx as we continue expanding strategic partnerships with the roofing industry’s leading business management solutions,” said Dan Tinker, President and CEO of SRS.

Cotney Capital Corporation Formed to Accelerate Growth in the Construction Industry

The Cotney Capital Corporation, a private equity and venture capital company designed to accelerate growth in the roofing and construction industries, is pleased to announce its launch. In addition to offering investment options for growing companies, Cotney Capital also has a revolutionary incubator program designed to partner emerging companies in the construction sector with mentors that will guide them on AccuLynx and SRS Distribution Announce the path to success. Partnership to Accelerate Roofing “When I surveyed the private equity and venture Contractor Workflows capital markets for construction start-ups, I did not AccuLynx, a leading provider of all-in-one business see another company that would be able to combine management software for roofing contractors, anthe resources that we have at our disposal with the nounced a new technology partnership with SRS decades of experience in the industry. That singularity Distribution, one of the largest and fastest growing of focus allows our investees and mentees to gain a building product distributors in the United States. competitive advantage. I recognize that the industry is This new partnership integrates AccuLynx software at a tipping point where it must embrace technology with SRS Distribution’s Roof Hub order and materials to survive. My goal with Cotney Capital is to invest and management program, enabling roofing contractors to mentor the future of construction,” said Trent Cotney, create faster, more accurate estimates and to faciliCEO of Cotney Capital. tate a more seamless material ordering process. Participants in Cotney Capital’s incubator program SRS Distribution customers who use AccuLynx will receive hands on training on go-to-market stratwill now be able to access SRS products, see their egies, operations and controlled growth and scaling, specific material pricing and place electronic orders among other things. In addition, Cotney Capital has for materials directly from AccuLynx. This convenient the legal resources needed to assist in any corporate and streamlined workflow eliminates the need for transaction involving a participant’s business. AccuLynx users to log into another system to gather “I am excited to be a part of Cotney Capital,” says material costs or place orders. John Kenney, Chief Innovation Officer of Cotney “For over 10 years, AccuLynx’s mission has been to Capital. “In addition to my 45-plus years’ experience in provide roofing contractors with innovative technolthe construction industry, I have helped develop many ogy that helps them manage and grow their business cutting-edge technology solutions for clients that while simplifying the way they work,” said Mike Stein, have increased efficiency and accelerated growth. I Chief Executive Officer of AccuLynx. “We are proud look forward to being the tip of the spear and working to integrate with companies like SRS Distribution to with the bright minds of our future.” drive even greater efficiencies for our customers. This For more information about Cotney Capital, please integration makes it easier than ever for roofing congo to www.cotneycapital.com. tractors to estimate job costs and place orders directly to their local SRS branch.” TAMKO’S Rick the Roofer Retires After AccuLynx helps roofing contractors manage every 52-Year Career in the Roofing Industry aspect of their job from a single, cloud-based applicaTAMKO Building Products LLC announced the retiretion. It combines customer relationship management ment of well-known roofing products expert, Rick the www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

DS322-18v

I N T E G R AT E D T O O L

Superior Line of Sight, Feed on Return & a Newly Designed Nosepiece Make Tile Roofing Applications Easier than Before. Visit BOOTH 141 and Demo Our Latest DuraSpin Tools & Attachments

C O L L AT E D R O O F I N G S C R E W S

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

Roofer, after an impressive career of more than 52 years of industry experience as a roofing contractor and TAMKO sales team member and trainer. Rick the Roofer, also known as TAMKO Field Sales Training Manager Rick Taylor, officially retired on February 27, 2021 and TAMKO celebrated the momentous occasion with a tribute video featuring highlights from Taylor’s nationwide traveling roadshow adventures as Rick the Roofer along with “happy retirement” wishes from fellow TAMKO team members that include Rick the Roofer’s signature move: the thumbs up. “I’ve known Rick for 20-plus years and he is one of the most passionate people I have met in the roofing business,” said TAMKO Vice President of Sales and Marketing Stephen McNally. “Rick loves to sell and he is extremely enthusiastic and always willing to take on a new challenge. I wish him the best on a new chapter in his life.” Taylor’s career includes 25 years as a roofing contractor in St. Louis, Mo. working in his family-run roofing business. After joining the TAMKO team in 1994, Taylor represented TAMKO in various field sales roles, including Territory Manager over the St. Louis area. Throughout his 27-year career at TAMKO, Taylor was passionate about training TAMKO sales representatives, contractors and distributors about the company’s products and proper installations, which inspired the company’s initiative to share Taylor’s expertise and product knowledge on a wider scale. In 2018, Taylor was promoted to Field Sales Training Manager and TAMKO launched the first-ever Rick the Roofer national roadshow tour of contractor and distributor events to provide education, resources and hands-on installation demonstrations for roofing industry professionals. “Rick has brought outstanding character and energy to both TAMKO and the roofing industry for many years,” said TAMKO Chairman and CEO David Humphreys. “We are proud of his success and the lasting impressions he has made on roofing professionals across the country. He will be missed by many, but we wish him all the best in his retirement.” “I’ve had a great career as a roofer and as a member of Team TAMKO,” said Taylor. “I feel so lucky to have spent the last 27 years of my career at TAMKO sharing my passion with other roofers.”

The Roofing Alliance Announces Finalists for 2021 Student Competition

The Roofing Alliance, celebrating 25 years as the foundation of the National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA), is proud to announce the finalist teams for the 7th annual Roofing Alliance construction management student competition. The oral presentations for this well-known event will take place virtually on April 8. The four finalist teams are:

■ Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. ■ Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex. ■ University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. This year’s competition challenges the four university-level Construction Management student teams through written and oral presentations, testing their roofing knowledge, project management capabilities and presentation skills. The teams had to research the project, review the plans and specifications and assemble a full estimate and qualified bid package proposal that was submitted to the Roofing Alliance judges. This year, the teams were tasked with submitting a qualified bid package for a new roof system on the Las Vegas Raiders’ practice facility, part of the new Intermountain Healthcare Performance Center in Henderson, Nevada. Working with Dennis Conway, the founder of the student competition and owner of Commercial Roofers Inc., Las Vegas, the Roofing Alliance student competition committee has prepared the following timeline: ■ April 8 – Oral presentations with the four finalist teams presenting virtually to the panel of judges. ■ April 16 at 3 pm ET – Award presentations will be to virtually announce the winning teams and the Best Individual Presenters. Below are the instructions to join the April 16 Zoom event: https://nrca.zoom.us/j/96417970809?pwd=WXhYNE9ydkZVa3dHaHA1Q1JGMnA1QT09 Meeting ID: 964 1797 0809 Passcode: 616946 US Toll-free 888-475-4499 “We know that many schools are not allowing faculty or students to travel, so we have created a fully virtual competition. The finalist teams will present oral presentations virtually,” stated Allen Lancaster, current Student Competition Chair and Vice President of Metalcrafts a Tecta America Co., Savannah, Ga. “We are excited about the caliber of the teams competing. We want this competition to continue to be a favorite among construction management programs.” For more information on the Roofing Alliance student competition, the April 16 virtual awards event and overall information about the Roofing Alliance, contact Bennett Judson, the Roofing Alliance’s Executive Director, at bjudson@roofingalliance.net or visit www.roofingalliance.net.

FRM

■ Clemson University, Clemson, SC www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

New ASTM Standard Replaces Felt Standards for Qualification of Synthetic Underlayments Greg Keeler, Technical Service Leader, Owens Corning Synthetic underlayments have been available for over 20 years and very early versions left a bad impression on some contractors. However, things have now changed for the better.

development – until now.

Why Synthetic Underlayment?

Early synthetic underlayments were tested and qualified for use under ASTM Standards that were intended to be applied to asphalt-impregnated felt underlayments. For many years, the International Codes (IBC and IRC) and the Florida Building Code have referenced ASTM D226, ASTM D4869 and ASTM D6757 – all standards that were intended to apply to asphaltic felt underlayments. The problem with that approach was that those standards are primarily composition driven. Since they were intended to be applied to asphaltic underlayments, there is very little testing that can be performed on synthetic underlayments. In fact, when a synthetic underlayment is tested under ASTM D226, for instance, the only tests that can be applied are the Unrolling, Breaking Strength and Pliability tests. Those that have installed underlayment know that those three tests alone demonstrate very little about a product’s suitability. It didn’t take too long for the roofing industry to recognize the unsuitability of the existing felt standards for assessing synthetic underlayments. As a result, several synthetic underlayment manufacturers worked with the International Code Council Evaluation Service (ICC-ES) to develop Acceptance Criteria for synthetic underlayments. Acceptance Criteria are similar to ASTM Standards, with a couple of distinct differences:

Roofing contractors are always looking for ways to do their job more efficiently and to provide product choices that they feel improve the quality and durability of the installed roof. Asphalt felt underlayments, also referred to as “felt paper” or “tar paper,” have served the roofing industry well for decades. However, there have always been shortcomings with these products. As the monikers indicate, the most prevalent drawback of these products is that they are essentially paper saturated with asphalt. The organic paper core of these products is sensitive to changes in humidity and tears easily. Because the paper core isn’t 100 percent saturated, the paper can still absorb moisture, which can cause waviness when installed on the roof. Generally, the heavier the paper core, the more waviness potential. The other major drawback of these products is their propensity to tear easily. Tearing is a concern especially where it occurs around fasteners when the product is enduring foot traffic during roof covering installation. Tearing is also a major concern when it comes to the ability of the underlayment to remain in place during a high wind event, especially if the primary roof covering has blown off. The above concerns were the primary drivers for the development of synthetic underlayments. Synthetic underlayments are designed to provide superior strength: resistance against both tensile (pulling) and tearing. However, the test standards for these products just hadn’t caught up to product

The History of Synthetic Underlayment Testing

■ They are not consensus-based standards; the test requirements and conditions of acceptance are determined by the manufacturer and ICC-ES with very limited input from industry stakeholders. ■ The Acceptance Criteria cannot be referenced in the I-Codes as a Reference Standard. Acceptance Criteria are deemed to be an alternative compliance path that applies to products for which the codes do not include prescriptive 12

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

requirements. Additionally, they are limited to use exclusively for the purposes of obtaining an ICC-ES Evaluation Report. The two applicable Acceptance Criteria are: ■ AC 188 – Acceptance Criteria for Roof Underlayments ■ AC 207 – Acceptance Criteria for Polypropylene Roof Underlayments (limited to spun bond polypropylene underlayments)

Industry and Increased Synthetic Underlayment Presence Prompted Development of an ASTM Standard

After years of increasing numbers of synthetic underlayment products being introduced into the market, without a defined process for qualifying the underlayments, the roofing industry decided that it was finally time to develop a consensus standard for these products. Over approximately an eight-year period, members of an ASTM Task Group worked to develop a standard that establishes appropriate and stringent

performance requirements for synthetic underlayments. Task group members represent contractors, roof consultants, product manufacturers, test labs, test equipment manufacturers and more. This diverse membership lends credibility to the process and the resulting standard. The result of this hard work is ASTM D8257 – Standard Specification for Mechanically Attached Polymeric Roof Underlayment Used in Steep Slope Roofing. This standard establishes a high bar for synthetic underlayment performance and durability. It includes many test requirements that are unprecedented for underlayment standards. These tests include fastener pull-through, UV resistance and hydrostatic resistance among others. To illustrate the benefits of synthetic products that are tested and approved in accordance with ASTM D8257, below is a table that compares the differences between the various felt-based ASTM Standards, the ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria and the new ASTM D8257 Standard. Continued on page 41

FELT UNDERLAYMENTS

SYNTHETIC UNDERLAYMENTS

TEST

ASTM D226

ASTM D4869

ICC-ES AC188

ICC-ES AC207

ASTM D8257

Unrolling

Yes

Breaking (tensile) Strength

Yes

Tear Strength

Yes

Pliability

Yes

Liquid Water Transmission

Yes

Ultraviolet Resistance

Yes

Fastener Pull-Through Resistance

Yes

Accelerated Aging

Yes

Temperature Cycling

Yes

Linear Dimensional Change

Yes

Hydrostatic Resistance

Yes

Fire Resistance

Optional

www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

Use of Polyurethane Adhesives and Insulation in the Roofing Industry Riku Ylipelkonen, Technical Service Manager, Polyset Roofing Adhesives, ICP Building Solutions Group

Otto Bayer is credited with developing polyurethane in 1937. Original development applications were related to aircraft coatings for World War II and flexible foams. Commercial applications began later in 1952 and grew steadily as polyurethane foams became a viable choice for rigid foam buns and molding parts where the reaction occurred in the mold for the finished part. The advantages of polyurethane foam (PUF) helped grow many applications and uses. High heat resistance and long-term stability due to the polymer being a thermoset plastic led to the development of PUF adhesives in roofing applications. Polyurethane is a reaction polymer, where isocyanates react with polyols and result in a thermosetting polymer. The main feature of thermosetting polymers is that they do not melt or breakdown with the application of heat. For example, when eggs and flour are combined and cooked, a pancake is made. The pancake cannot be returned to eggs and flour by heating it up. The opposite of thermoset polymers is thermoplastic polymers. Thermoplastic polymers will return to their original state if heated. As an example of this, an ice cube will become water if it is heated. However, if the water is returned to a freezer, it will become an ice cube again. The other benefit of thermosetting polymers is the long-term stability of the polymer. However, the stability of polyurethane polymers is mainly susceptible to exposure of ultraviolet (UV) light. When PUF is exposed to sunlight, which contains UV light, there is a yellowing discoloration that occurs over time. The higher energy of UV light can also cause reactions that break-up the PUF and flake the exposed foam off as exposure time is prolonged. Prevalent uses of PUF in the roofing industry have slowly grown over the years. The applications that 14

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

are specified have used different polyurethane formulations which vary based on the raw materials used. Sprayed polyurethane foam (SPF) roofs are popular and substantial low slope roof applications that use the physical properties of polyurethane more as an insulation than an adhesive. Raw materials are varied to result in a high closed-cell content that create excellent insulation properties. The use of spray equipment, where the reaction is controlled on the rooftop, helps to minimize preparation process to the job site. The top coating is used to minimize sunlight and UV light exposure, to maintain the physical properties and waterproofing qualities of the finished roof. A growing application for SPF is as an adhesive for roofing materials. On low slope roofing, these adhesives are used to adhere common building materials to make the final roof assembly. On steep slope roofing, SPF adhesives are used for adhering clay and concrete roof tiles. SPF can be advantageous for several reasons. There is no need for high temperature materials like hot asphalt that cost money to heat and transport to the installation site safely (crew safety, property destruction and insurance considerations). SPFs are usually low in volatile organic compounds (VOC), reducing site complaints of fumes during application, environmental considerations for the project and simpler, less costly personal protective equipment (PPE) for installers. SPF adhesives can also minimize

Features and Benefits (includes all of the features & benefits of WIP 100, plus):

WIP GRIP Technology

•

Superior slip-resistance on wet and dry applications for safe and easy installation

•

No more tracking

•

Adds strength in vulnerable areas, including penetrations, valleys, and over plywood clips

•

At the time of eventual re-roof, the proprietary film surface helps to prevent the embedding of shingles to underlayment, providing for easier tear-off

or eliminate the need for mechanical fasteners and roof penetrations, to reduce the likelihood of leaks, energy loss through heat conduction of metal fasteners and the amount of labor required to install materials. For roofing applications, the PUF options fall into two main categories, one-component (1K, moisture-cured) and two-component (2K, chemical-cured) systems. The advantages of 1K systems are usually ease of use, cost and easier to have multiple systems being used on the roof at the same time. To take full advantage of a 1K product, the isocyanates and polyols are packaged into the same cylinder under pressure and come out of the dispensing equipment as a properly ratioed foam ready to be applied to the materials to be adhered. This eliminates the ratio calibration checks and periodic checks for properly curing foam that most manufacturers require with a 2K product. This allows for simpler operation of the product dispensing system and less packaging than a comparable 2K product. 1K products are usually produced in smaller packaging to allow multiple kits to be used at the same time on a roof with a larger number of qualified applicators in order to get more squares done per day. The tradeoffs for 1K products include that they require ambient moisture to facilitate the curing of the foam, lower values of physical properties than 2K gram per gram and the need for the 1K PUF to be compressed into final place for developing a compatible bond with substrates. 1K will need to be compressed between tile-to-tile applications and cover board-to-insulation layer applications to bite and form a bond to whatever substrate the product is applied. The 1K products also cure from the outside in, which limits how much adhesive can be applied to one location while having the ability for the foam paddy or bead to completely cure to designed physical properties characteristics. The last consideration for 1K components is the limitation of ambient and substrate temperatures. Because the 1K needs moisture and compression to cure, it favors warmer and more humid ambient conditions to facilitate a complete cure. Two-component systems are favorable when physical properties (like tensile strength) need to be maximized, wider temperature ranges for ambient and substrate temperatures are required and for larger size jobs requiring faster application rates, larger

containers of product and more uniform physical property characteristics in the final product without the presence of ambient moisture. 2K products can be fine-tuned to cure quicker, grow more during application and have a specific set of physical properties for the desired application. 2K products are better at expansion to a final size to ensure good contact area under roof tile applications and to account for deck undulations when laying insulation or cover board on an existing roof deck. Since the formulations of 2K products have catalysts in the formula to ensure proper and desired cure, ambient moisture is not a concern and a wider range of ambient and substrate temperatures can be utilized. This also ensures that the 2K products cure from the inside out, so large volumes and increased open times can be taken advantage of if the application benefits from it. This also helps the 2K products to be more uniform in final cured form, possess better cell structure in the body of the foam paddy or bead and they don’t need applied compression to form bonds with the substrate. The trade-off for 2K products also should be considered. Qualified applicators need to make sure the dispensing equipment is set-up properly to prevent crossovers from kit to kit, dispensing equipment must be kept clean, flowing and purged at wait times to prevent any clogs or cured foam within the lines. This could ruin the entire kit if disposable pre-pressurized kits are being used. Depending on the dispensing system, ratio calibration and periodic ratio checks are also required to maintain quality of the job and to catch changing variables like temperature and pressures of the separate components. Also, the chemical must be kept within the recommended temperature range; cold jobsites could ruin productivity if the product is too cold to use. However, if the 2K products are properly set-up, dispensed and applied, the final product will be stronger, faster to apply and more profitable for the roofing contractor. Product offerings for polyurethane adhesives and insulation are growing constantly in the roofing industry. The list of companies that are offering these products is growing as well. When looking at the options for products and companies, there are benefits to looking out for companies that have knowledge of the roofing applications, have local personnel to support the contractors on the jobsites and provide Continued on page 41

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

866.303.5868 | INFO@COTNEYCL.COM | WWW.COTNEYCL.COM MAIN OFFICE: TAMPA

866.303.5868 COTNEYCL.COM

Training, Codes, Legislation and Research are on FRSA’s Horizon Mike Silvers, CPRC, Owner of Silvers Systems Inc. and FRSA Technical Director Like many of you, I was thrilled to see that the next FRSA Board of Directors meeting in April will be an in-person event. For many of us this is another step in the all-too-slow return to somewhat normal. Virtual meetings have allowed our work to continue but are lacking in the face-to-face exchanges of information and viewpoints that in-person meetings offer. These meetings and the Convention have been the life blood of our Association. A few days before this writing I received my COVID vaccination. I was among the last in my age group to receive it but was very happy and somewhat relieved to get it. I guess there are a few advantages of being an old guy – I’m not complaining about getting older mind you – I certainly prefer it to the alternative. Beginning to put the effects of the virus in the rearview mirror is, in many ways, a new starting point for what lies ahead. With that in mind, I want to lay out just some of the opportunities and challenges that await FRSA and the Florida roofing industry it represents.

Training

As we rebound and start rehiring, attracting new folks to the industry, providing appropriate training will be more important than ever. Roofing is becoming more complex every year. New materials and application methods, along with more complex NRCA ProCertification tile testing.

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

and stringent building codes, demand that we as an industry respond by training our workforce. Recently, I had the opportunity to attend a pilot testing program for the National Roofing Contractors Association’s (NRCA) ProCertification for Clay and Concrete Tile Systems held at Trent Cotney’s impressive facility in Tampa. If you are into cars, and who’s not, you know how impressive early transportation advertising signs can be. If you are into roofing, which you must be if you’re reading this, Trent’s shop area behind his offices is every bit as impressive. His collection of roofing-related signs and memorabilia from the twentieth century was a stroll down memory lane. Thanks, Trent, for all you do. Back to the tile testing. Once those participating in one of the ProCertification modules completes a course, he or she will need to take a final hands-on exam demonstrating experience and knowledge of that particular module. A qualified accessor oversees the hands-on demonstration. Attending as an accessor was Trent’s instructor and master mockup fabricator, Jim Montague. NRCA had a great group there that included: John Schehl, Jared Ribble, Jon Goodman and Frank Perna. Representing Eagle Roofing Products and FRSA was the always willing and invaluable Manny Oyola. He was not only helping with the students' hands-on roof tile evaluation but was also acting as an interpreter. FRSA is

FRSA Codes Committee meeting.

hoping to partner with NRCA to further develop and implement this program in Florida. FRSA’s Educational Foundation has continued to offer both virtual and in-person roofing-specific seminars. Recommended social distancing and masking procedures have been implemented during in-person seminars that have taken place in the Training Center at FRSA’s new headquarters building in Orlando. The in-person seminars offer two hours of continuing education (CE) credit that covers major roofing-related changes in the 7th Edition (2020) Florida Building Code (FBC). I have served

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

as the instructor for this portion of the seminars. An additional hour of CE covers the changes in the new FRSA-TRI (Tile Roofing Industry Alliance) Florida High Wind Concrete and Clay Installation Manual 6th Edition. The instructor for this portion of the seminars is Manny Oyola. The industry is very fortunate to have Manny’s continued dedication. The FBC and tile manual seminars, as well as many more great seminars, will be offered during FRSA's 99th Annual Convention and the Florida Roofing & Sheet Metal Expo (July 21-23, 2021). We have a very knowledgeable and interesting group

Roofing Apprenticeship participants learning via Zoom meetings

of speakers and instructors who are dedicated to improving their industry. I, for one, can’t wait. We have also developed a one-hour version of the 2020 FBC updates that we recently presented for two of our affiliates as a non-CE webinar. I am available to schedule this course for other affiliates virtually and, hopefully very soon, in-person. If you’re interested, contact me to arrange possible presentations for your group. Manny and I have also recently presented an

early morning seminar and a luncheon seminar for the Palm Beach County Building Officials on both the tile manual and the one-hour FBC changes. Our presentations seemed to be well received. We will be planning similar events in the near future. In April, we will be presenting a recruitment and hands-on training course at the Future Builders of America (FBA) Summit. This is a great opportunity to expose young people who already have an interest in construction to the roofing industry and the

www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

many possible career paths that it offers. The Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) and FRSA Apprenticeship Program is proceeding very well, especially when you consider that the majority of the classes are being presented via Zoom meetings. We have a great group of students. Clay Thomas of Advanced Roofing, Ft. Lauderdale is doing most of the heavy lifting here. I jump in when I’m available to help out. Across the state, there are several of these programs taking place with a great team of instructors and volunteers. Clay Thomas and Tyler Allwood, Eagle Roofing Products, are among some FRSA regulars who are serving as subject matter experts (SME) for the development of a college credit roofing curriculum for the National Center for Construction Education and Research (NCCER). I am happy to be a part of this great group of SME from across the country who are participating in this endeavor. FRSA is also working on an entry level training program titled FRSA Introduction to Roofing Technology. It is coming along nicely thanks to the efforts of the Worker Training Subcommittee.

Legislation

Many of this year’s slate of legislative bills involve items that effect our industry and are technical in nature. Property insurance reform in particular is a hot topic. Many of these bills are meant to address the growing number and cost of water damage and roof replacement claims. Our Codes Committee and Codes Subcommittee are working closely with our Governmental Affairs Committee and our lobbyist, Chris Dawson, to offer our advice and assistance, which includes coordinating efforts with other trade groups we regularly work with on code issues. There are also other proposed bills that effect the building code and its enforcement. Of particular interest is limiting the enforcement of local amendments that have not been properly adopted and haven’t been provided to the Florida Building Commission staff for inclusion as local amendments. FRSA’s lobbying efforts also include construction defects and workers’ compensation bills. Chris is becoming more familiar with our industry and excelling while doing so. We’re lucky to have him on our team.

The Petition for Declaratory Statement (DS 2021007) was seeking the Commission’s position on whether the replacement of non-damaged areas of a roof should be computed within the 25 percent threshold limit set forth in 706.1.1, Florida Building Code. FRSA joined the petitioner, SDii Global Corporation, in its position that repair of non-damaged areas of a roof should not be computed within the 25 percent threshold limit. FRSA’s motion supported the petitioner’s interpretation of the Building Code, noting that it is a reasonable and logical interpretation of the Code. FRSA pointed out that a contrary interpretation of the Code would result in immense economic waist, unnecessarily burden property owners and restrict roofing contractors’ discretion to salvage otherwise viable roofing systems. FBC staff analysis agreed with the petitioner and has forwarded the petition to the Commission for a vote in April. Trent’s team also represents FRSA, and the industry, before other regulatory boards such as the Construction Industry Licensing Board (CILB) and the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR). Much thanks to Trent and his team for all their hard work!

Building Codes

While we are still digesting the many changes in the 2020 FBC and then diligently working to inform our members and others about them, we are already deep into our next triennial cycle code adoption process. You can see by reviewing the Workplan for the 8th Edition (2023) FBC Update Development Tasks (pages 24-25) that it is an involved and ongoing process. The first task is to review changes brought into our code from the International Building Code (IBC). Which IBC changes eventually will be presented to the FBC Technical Advisory Committees (TACs) and then to the Commission, will be determined by the Commission staff. We have reviewed the roofing-related changes in the 2021 IBC, which allows us to see what might be coming in May and helps us to respond accordingly. Our Codes Committees have already began discussing and developing code change modifications that FRSA will present beginning in January 2022. All other proposed modifications presented by the public will also be submitted by then as well. At that point, we will develop and present our positions Declaratory Statement on all of these modifications. Between then and In March, FRSA, through our legal team from Cotney March 2023, we will testify and attempt to have our Attorneys and Consultants, submitted a motion to positions included in the new code. Reviewing and intervene in a petition before the Florida Building tracking these changes is important and takes a Commission (FBC) regarding the Florida Building Code’s threshold limit for the percentage of a roof area group effort. We are fortunate to have knowledgeable and involved volunteers on both our Codes that may be repaired before replacement of a comCommittee and Subcommittee to help in this effort. plete roof covering is required. Continued on page 23 22

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

FRSA, continued from page 22

very different industry issues. But all of the committees have the same overall goal, to improve our The Codes Committee recommended and the Educational Foundation Trustees approved funding Association as well as the industry and trade that it represents. for a research project to test the combination of a Much like our volunteers, our staff works across nailed #30 and self-adhering tile underlayment to many different areas and addresses many differdetermine the resistance to uplift pressure using ent issues. We depend on each other’s strengths, several different attachment patterns and products. knowledge and expertise to continue moving our Our goal is to determine if a nailed #30 is a suitable members’ goals forward. I know we are all proud to anchor (base) sheet for this particular underlayment represent FRSA and are ready to meet the upcomsystem. The task force working on this project ing challenges. includes Greg Keeler, Owens Corning, Manny Oyola FRM and myself. We will begin testing at the PRI Tampa th facility in April. The 6 Edition FRSA-TRI Florida Mike Silvers, CPRC is owner of Silvers Systems High Wind Concrete and Clay Tile Installation Inc. and is consulting with FRSA as Director of Manual requires that all tile underlayments meet Technical Services. Mike is an FRSA Past President, the design pressures for the structures they are Life Member and Campanella Award recipient and installed on. The system we are testing is a prebrings over 40 years of industry knowledge and scriptive method in use in Florida that very well may experience to FRSA’s team. not meet those pressures. More to come on this subject.

Research

Volunteers and Staff

FRSA is very privileged to have so many dedicated volunteers that are truly interested in improving the roofing industry. You’ll see so many familiar faces attending multiple committee meetings covering

The Geocel All-Pro Lineup ®

Whatever your roof needs, we’ve got the right sealant for the job.

2300® Construction Tripolymer Sealant High-performance sealant for use on common roofing substrates.

3300®/3500 Professional Polyurethane Sealants High-performance sealants that withstand adverse weather conditions.

• Exceptional flexibility and adhesion • UV and mildew resistant • Paintable • Resealable

• Stays flexible with minimal shrinkage • Primer adhesion on most substrates • 3500: Ideal for both bonding and sealing applications • Paintable

4350 Metal Roofing & Siding Construction Sealant Provides a strong, longlasting bond and can be applied in extreme wet or dry conditions down to 0 °F. • • • •

Permanently flexible Watertight seal No shrinkage Shades to match popular metal roof colors

www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

8th Edition (2023) FBC Code Update Development Tasks 8th Edition (2023) Update to the Florida Building Code— Tasks

Schedule

Selection of the model codes: 2020 NEC published and available to the public; 2021 International Codes published and available to the public; Commission selects 2021 I-Codes model codes and 2020 NEC to conduct its review

8/25/2019 January 2021 2/9/2021

Review of the model code changes: In coordination with ICC, staff post complete listing of the code changes to the I-Codes online

2/25/2021

Staff post on Commission website/Building Code Information System (BCIS) analysis of the 2021 I-Code change to provide for identification of the following:

5/17/2021

■ Provisions which overlap with the provisions of the FBC ■ Provisions which correlate directly with the provisions of the FBC ■ Provisions which provide for energy efficiency standards that meet or exceed the national energy standards mandated by Title III of the Energy Conservation and Protection Act ■ Provisions which are necessary to maintain eligibility for federal funding and discounts from the National Flood Insurance Program, the Federal Emergency management Agency, or the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Residential Construction Cost Impact Workgroup (RCCIWG) reviews the 2021 changes to the International Residential Code (IRC) and provides comments to the Commissions TACs on impactful code changes. RCCIWG meeting on-site meeting (TBD)

TBD

45 day public review and comment period ends (By Rule -45 day min before TAC review)

7/1/2021

Staff post on Commission website analysis of the 2021 I-Code changes with public comments (Tracking Charts and code change monographs)

8/2/2021

TACs review the 2021 changes to the I-Codes and make recommendations to the Commission regarding those changes as follows:

9/27-28/2021

■ That the Commission rejects certain model code provisions by consent agenda. ■ (Due to such issues as being unnecessary, negatively impacting the level of public health, safety, or general welfare provided by an existing Florida Building Code provision, diminishing the requirements of provisions related to wind resistance or water intrusion, unnecessarily imposing additional costs, or potentially requiring modification or further investigation before being adopted for use in this state) ■ That the Commission approves certain model code provisions by consent agenda. ■ (When considering whether to recommend inclusion on a consent agenda for approval, the TACs shall consider such criteria as whether the model code provisions are editorial or organizational in nature, correct an error, provide clarification, provide for alternative design methods, improve the effectiveness of the code, are uncontroversial to affected stakeholders, or are required by law.) ■ That the Commission approve or reject certain model code provisions after considering them individually ■ (When recommending individual consideration of model code updates, the TACs shall consider such criteria as whether the update has the potential to impose significant costs, cause confusion or regulatory difficulty, may be unnecessary, is highly controversial to affected stakeholders, or requires further evaluation.) TACs meetings on site – TBD Staff post TACs recommendations online for further public review

10/15/2021

Deadline for requesting amendments (2021 I-Codes changes) to be pulled of the consent agenda for individual consideration

11/19/2021

Commission considers TACs recommendations regarding the latest changes to the model codes – on site meeting (TBD) 24

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

12/14-15/2021

8th Edition (2023) FBC Code Update Development Tasks (Continued) Tasks

Schedule

Staff post Commissions recommendations online

1/3/2022

Proposed modification to the foundation code and Commissions approved I-Codes changes Period for public to propose modifications to the 7th Edition (2020) FBC and the Commissions approved I-Codes changes

1/4/2022 2/15/2022

Proposed amendments reviewed by staff and posted to the Commission website

3/3/2022

1st 45 day comment period ends (By law -45 day min before TAC review)

4/18/2022

Staff post on Commission website proposed code changes (Tracking Charts and Detail Reports)

5/2/2022

TACs consider proposed modifications (1st 45 day comment period) TACs meetings – 4-day on-site meetings

6/20-24/2022

TACs recommendations posted to the website Starting date for the 2nd 45 day comment period

7/12/2022 TBD

Residential Construction Cost Impact Workgroup (RCCIWG) reviews the TACs recommendations with regard to the proposed modifications to the Florida Residential Code (FRC) and provides comments to the TACs/Commission on impactful code changes. RCCIWG meeting on-site meeting (TBD) 2nd 45 day comment period ends (by law 45 day min before Commission review)

8/26/2022

Staff post on Commission website proposed code changes with comments (Tracking Chats and Details Reports)

9/21/2022

TACs consider public comments on their actions on the proposed mods TACs meetings 4-day meetings [2-day on-site (TBD) and 2 day via conference/webinar] As needed and as applicable

10/11-14/2022

Staff post on Commission website TACs consideration of public comments

11/10/2022

Commission considers TAC recommendations (2nd 45 day comment period) Commission 2-day meeting

12/13-14/2022

8th Edition (2023) FBC (7th Edition (2020) FBC, Florida Supplement and Commissions approved I-Codes) posted online

1/19/2023

Provide Supplements to ICC for integration into the 7th Edition (2020) FBC TACs review comments to Rule Development Workshop of March 13, 2020 and make recommendations to the Commission TACs meetings – 3-day on-site meetings and 3-day conference call/webinar meetings Rule Development Workshop Commission – 1-day meeting

2/22-24/2023

March 13, 2023

Integrated Draft 8th Edition (2023) FBC Posted online

May 22, 2023

Hearing on 8th Edition (2023) FBC to consider received comments

TBD

Final Rule Hearing on 8th Edition (2023) FBC/Commission approves final version of Code 8th Edition (2023) Florida Fire Prevention Code available in final format

TBD

Rule Submitted to Secretary of State and Supplement/Integrated posted online – subject to addressing all JAPCs concerns

TBD

Final FBC -PDF posted

TBD

Printed Code available – subject to negotiation with ICC

TBD

2023 FBC (8th Edition) effective date (6 months after publication)

12/31/2023

553.73(7)(e) A rule updating the Florida Building Code in accordance with this subsection shall take effect no sooner than 6 months after publication of the updated code. Any amendment to the Florida Building Code which is adopted upon a finding by the commission that the amendment is necessary to protect the public from immediate threat of harm takes effect immediately. Source: https://www.floridabuilding.org/fbc/commission/FBC_0221/Commission/2023_FBC_Workplan.htm www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

FRSA-TRI 6th Edition Tile Manual Manny Oyola, Jr., Eastern Region and Florida, Eagle Roofing Products ASCE 7-16 ■ Revised and improved installation detail drawings

Matrix Revisions

The matrix is a table (next page) that was created to help contractors determine the type of roof that will be installed following a set method. The table flows from left to right. Each step is dependent upon the next and cannot be mixed. Select your roof system and follow the matrix each step of the way.

Design Flow Chart 6th EDITION

Florida High Wind Concrete and Clay Tile Installation Manual FRSA–TRI Alliance December 31, 2020 (12-31-20)

The 6th Edition FRSA-TRI Florida High Wind Concrete and Clay Roof Tile Installation Manual, developed by FRSA and the Tile Roofing Industry Alliance (TRI), launched with the 2020 Florida Building Code (FBC) and is the reference standard for tile installation outside of the HVHZ. The High-Velocity Hurricane Zones (HVHZ) utilizes the roofing application standards (RAS) 118, 119, 120 and 127 for their requirements for roof tile installation. With the adoption of ASCE 7-16 into the FBC, roof design pressures have changed and more calculations or information from the tile manual tables are needed to establish uplift moments and the potential need for stronger attachments. Other notable changes include:

Mechanical Resistance Values on Plywood

■ Matrix revisions for underlayment and flashing

For mean roof heights (MRH) above 60 ft, engineering calculations must be submitted for permitting. For attachment systems not listed in the table for 19/32” sheathing, use the allowable aerodynamic uplift resistance from Table 3 for 15/32” sheathing. The allowable aerodynamic uplift moments include a generic restoring gravity moment of 6.5 ft-lbf for a direct deck and a restoring gravity moment of 5.5 ft-lbs for a batten installation.

■ New project design flow charts

Mechanical Fastening Methods

■ Design attachment system examples

A design flow chart (page 28) has been added to the 6th Edition tile manual to assist contractors in determining the required design pressures for underlayment and the uplift moment for the tile (Table 1A, page 30 and Table 2, page 31). Once these pressures are established, you’ll need to select an underlayment that meets the pressures by using either the twoply asphalt applied hot mop underlayment fastening system (Table 1, page 30) or the underlayment manufacturer's product approval. Then you will need to select the tile attachment from Table 3 (page 29) or the foam manufacturer’s product approval. Fill in the chart based on the roofing system you select and the different components needed for your roof design.

■ ASCE 7-16 design roof zone reference

■ Same approved fastening methods with same values as before.

■ Updated tables for underlayment and ridge attachment per ASCE 7-16

■ Reference Table 3 after determining the overturning moments for the roof.

■ Revised tables for required uplift of field tile per

■ Anchor Sheet Attachment – Deformed shank is

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

Roof Parameters Table from 6th Edition Tile Manual (Matrix) Battens Utilized

Pitch of Roof 4:12

Yes

and Greater

Field Tile Attachment

Number of Plys

Underlayment Application Method

Metal Flashing Type

Pre-formed Flashings With Returns or Without Returns

Additional Flashings Required

Roof Tile Fastener Penetrations

Single

Self-Adhered

Pre-Formed

Either

Transitional

–

Mechanical or Adhesive

Two

Single

Cold Applied

Pre-Formed

Either

Transitional

–

Heat Applied

Pre-Formed

Either

Transitional

–

Hot Mopped

Pre-Formed

Either

Transitional

–

Self-Adhered

Pre-Formed

Either

Transitional

–

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

See note below

Standard

Without Returns

–

See note below

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Self-Adhered Cold Applied

4:12 and Greater

Mechanical or Adhesive

Heat Applied Two Hot Mopped Self-Adhered Single

Cold Applied

3:12 No

Less than

Self-Adhered

Mechanical or Adhesive

4:12

Heat Applied Two Hot Mopped Self-Adhered Single

Cold Applied

3:12 Less than 4:12

Self-Adhered

Heat Applied

Adhesive Two

Hot Mopped Self-Adhered

Standard

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

See note below

Standard

Without Returns

–

See note below

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Pre-Formed

Without Returns

–

Sealed

Standard

–

Sealed

Note: Refer to underlayment manufacturer's written installation instructions or Product Approval.

inclusive of either ring or screw shank nail. Not smooth.

Roof Zones

There are now four pressure zones for a hip roof (1, 2e, 2r and 3) and six for a gable roof (1, 2e, 2r, 2n, 3e and 3r, ■ Screw Tile Fasteners – Screws shall be corrosion Figures 1.0 and 2.0 on page 32). resistant ASTM A 641, Class 1 or corrosion resistance equal, according to ASTM B117. Screws shall ASCE 7-16 Risk Category II Wind Map be 2-1/2’’ in length (minimum #8 course thread). Note: Risk Category IV is the only new or changed ■ Nail Tile Fasteners – Nails shall be corrosion wind map. resistant ASTM A641, Class 1, minimum 11 gauge, The map on page 33 shows the ultimate design 3-inch-long ring shank (18-22 rpi) with a head size wind speeds (Vult) for Risk Category II Building and of not less than 0.283 and shank of 0.121. Ring other Structures. Values are ultimate design 3-second shank nails shall be 10d corrosion resistant steel. www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

gust wind speeds in mph at 33 feet (10m) above ground for Exposure C category. Linear interpolation between contours is permitted. Islands and coastal areas outside the last contour will use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area.

6th EDITION 6th EDITION

Exposure B – For buildings with a mean roof height of less than or equal to 30 ft (9.1 m), Exposure B shall apply where the ground surface roughness, as defined by Surface Roughness B, prevails in the upwind direction for a distance greater than 1,500 ft (457 m).

FRSA–TRI FRSA–TRI

ROOF PROJECT DESIGN FLOW CHART ROOF PROJECT DESIGN FLOW CHART

17 17

Continued on page 31

INSTALLATION INSTALLATION

Underlayment Design Underlayment Design

Identify Exposure Category: Identify Exposure Category: Identify Mean Roof Height: Identify Mean Roof Height: Identify Basic Windspeed for Identify Basic Windspeed for Project Location: Project Location:

Use information from above to identify Required Design Pressure for Underlayment System Use information from above to identify Required Design Pressure for Underlayment System (Table 1A Hip or Gable depending on roof design): (Table 1A Hip or Gable depending on roof design):

If 2-Ply Hot Mop, use Table 1 to identi2-Ply Hot Mop, use Table 1 topattern identifyIfrequired anchor sheet nailing fy required pattern (Value inanchor Table 1sheet mustnailing be equal to or (Value in Table 1 must be equal to or greater than Required Design Pressure greater than RequiredIdentified Design Pressure above): Identified above):

If Direct Deck or other underlayment system, If Direct Allowable Deck or other underlayment system, identify Design Pressure from FBC identify Approval Allowable(Allowable Design Pressure FBC Product Designfrom Pressure Product (Allowable Design Pressure mustApproval be equal to or greater than Required must beDesign equal to or greater than Required Pressure identified above): Design Pressure identified above):

Tile Design Tile Design

Identify Proper Table 2 Identify Proper Table 2

Gable or Hip? Exposure? Gable or Hip? Exposure? Table 2 G/H B/C/D Table 2 G/H B/C/D Example: Hip Roof in Exposure B would be Table 2 HB Example: Hip Roof in Exposure B would be Table 2 HB

Table 2 Table 2 Identify Roof Slope: Identify Roof Slope: Identify Mean Roof Height: Identify Mean Roof Height: Identify Ultimate Wind Speed Identify Ultimate Wind Speed for project: for project: Use Information above to identify Use Information to identify Required Uplift above Moment for Tile: Required Uplift Moment for Tile:

LPZ LPZ

Select method of Tile Attachment Select of Tile Attachment frommethod Table 3 or Foam Adhesives from Table 3 orPublished Foam Adhesives Manufacturer’s Values Manufacturer’s Values (Allowable Uplift Published Moment must be (Allowable Moment must be equal to orUplift greater than Required equalUplift to or greater than Required Moment from above): Uplift Moment from above):

| AprilWind FRSA-TRIROOFING Florida High FLORIDA 2021Concrete and Clay Tile Installation Manual – 6th Edition

FRSA-TRI Florida High Wind Concrete and Clay Tile Installation Manual – 6th Edition

HPZ HPZ

12/31/20 12/31/20

6th EDITION

FRSA–TRI TABLE 3

Method

Fastener Type

Method

Direct Deck Direct Deck

Low

Medium

High

Fastener Type

Description Attachment Description 1 SS, 1 C

Low 25.2

Medium 25.2

High 35.5

Nail

1 SS, 1 C 2

25.2 38.1

35.5 44.3

Nail Screw

15/32” Batten Batten

38.1 39.1

38.1 36.1

44.3 28.6

39.1

36.1 33.2

28.6 28.7

#8Screws Screw 21#8

39.1 50.2

33.2 55.5

28.7 51.3

2 1#8 Screws SS, 1C

50.2 27.5

55.5 27.5

51.3 29.4

Nail

1 SS, 1 C 2

27.5 37.6

29.4 47.2

Nail

2 SS, 1C 2 RS

37.6 24.6

37.6 36.4

47.2 26.8

2 Screw RS 1 #8

24.6 25.6

36.4 30.1

26.8 25.5

Screw

15/32”

2 SS, 1C 2 RS 2 Screw RS 1 #8

Screw

19/32”

Direct Deck

Screw Nail

19/32”

Direct Deck

Nail

#8Screws Screw 21#8

25.6 36.1

30.1 41.9

25.5 37.1

2 #82Screws RS

36.1 46.4

41.9 45.5

37.1 41.2

2 RS

46.4

45.5

41.2

APPENDIX APPENDIX A A

Deck Thickness Deck Thickness

Mechanical Fastening for Concrete and Clay Tiles TABLE 3 Mechanical Fastening Resistance Valuesand on Plywood Mechanical Fastening for Concrete Clay Tiles(ft-lbf) Mechanical Fastening Resistance Values on Plywood (ft-lbf) Attachment

SS = Smooth Shank Nail C = Clip RS = Ring Shank (See 5 for descriptions requirements of specific SS = page Smooth Shank Nail Cand = Clip RS = Ring Shank fasteners). (See page 5 for descriptions and requirements of specific fasteners). For mean roof heights (MRH) above 60 ft, engineering calculations must be submitted for permitting. mean roof heights (MRH) above engineering be allowable submittedaerodynamic for permitting.uplift resistance from For attachment systems not listed in 60 theft, table for 19/32"calculations sheathing, must use the the table for 15/32" sheathing. For attachment systems not listed in the table for 19/32" sheathing, use the allowable aerodynamic uplift resistance from the table for 15/32" sheathing. The allowable aerodynamic uplift moments include a generic restoring gravity moment of 6.5 ft-lbf for a direct deck and a restoring gravity moment of 5.5 ft-lbs for a batten installation. The allowable aerodynamic uplift moments include a generic restoring gravity moment of 6.5 ft-lbf for a direct deck and a restoring gravity moment of 5.5 ft-lbs for a batten installation. The fastener hole nearest the overlock shall be used when a single nail or screw is required. The fastener hole nearest the and nearest the fastener hole nearest overlock shall be used two is nails or screws used.hole nearest Theunderlock fastener hole the overlock shall the be used when a single nailwhen or screw required. The are fastener the underlock fastener hole nearest overlock shall Fasteners shalland be the located a minimum of 1.5"the from the head of be theused tile. when two nails or screws are used. Fasteners shall beof located a minimum of 1.5" from the head of and the tile. Note: The content this table was derived from testing by TRI all other resistance values for foam adhesive are the property of the foam adhesive manufacturers and found in the approvals of each individual product.

FRSA-TRI Florida High Wind Concrete and Clay Tile Installation Manual – 6th Edition FRSA-TRI Florida High Wind Concrete and Clay Tile Installation Manual – 6th Edition

12/31/20 12/31/20

www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

TABLE 1

APPENDIX A

Allowable Uplift Resistance Values for Anchor Sheet Attachment When Using a Two-Ply Asphalt Applied Hot Mop Underlayment Fastening System (psf)* Inches on Center

Two Rows in Field

Three Rows in Field

Four Rows in Field

Backnail 15/32 Inch 19/32 Inch 15/32 Inch 19/32 Inch 15/32 Inch 19/32 Inch Cap Sheet Smooth Deformed4 Smooth Deformed4 Smooth Deformed4 Smooth Deformed4 Smooth Deformed4 Smooth Deformed4

Field

Lap

41.6

47.4

52.7

60.0

49.6

56.5

62.9

71.5

58.6

66.6

74.2

84.3

43.1

49.1

54.6

62.1

51.8

58.9

65.6

74.6

61.4

69.9

77.8

88.5

44.9

51.0

56.8

64.6

54.4

61.9

68.9

78.3

64.9

73.9

82.2

93.5

47.0

53.5

59.5

67.7

57.6

65.5

72.9

82.9

69.2

78.7

87.6

99.6

49.6

56.5

62.9

71.5

61.5

70.0

78.0

88.6

74.4

84.7

94.3

107.2

53.0

60.3

67.2

76.4

66.6

75.8

84.4

96.0

81.3

92.4

102.9

117.0

57.6

65.5

72.9

82.9

73.5

83.6

93.0

105.8

90.3

102.8

114.4

130.1

72.7

81.0

92.0

83.0

94.4

105.1

119.5

83.6

93.0

105.8

97.3

110.7

123.2

140.1

6th EDITION 5 6 12 63.9 4

73.5

FRSA–TRI 103.0 117.2 130.5 122.1

138.9

154.6

148.4 175.8

DESIGN PRESSURES FOR UNDERLAYMENT AND RIDGE ATTACHMENT REQUIRED FOR 3CATEGORY 6 12 101.6 113.2 128.6 A 3:12 121.1 AND 137.8GREATER 153.4 174.4 175.1 194.9 (psf) 221.6 II89.3 BUILDINGS HAVING PITCH153.9 PER ASCE 7-16 Roof ASCE (3:12 Category II Buildings 1. Two rows staggered inGable the field, one–row at the7-16 lap and oneand rowOver), at the top edge of the cap sheet. Pressures for Underlayment and Ridge Attachment (psf) 2. Three rows staggered in the field, one row at the lap and one row at the top edge of the cap sheet. 115 row at 120 130 160cap sheet. 170 3. Four rows staggered in the field, one the lap and one row 140 at the top150 edge of the Mean

Roof Roof is inclusive of either Designring orDesign Designnail. Design 4. Deformed shank screw shank Roof

Design Exposure Zones Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure Heights * For other systems, refer to underlayment manufacturer's published data. (psf) (psf) (psf) (psf) (psf)

Exp B

Exp C

Exp D

All

Design Pressure (psf)

180

190

Design Pressure (psf)

Design Pressure (psf) 118.8

0-15

43.5

47.4

55.6

64.5

74.0

84.2

95.1

106.6

43.5

47.4

55.6

64.5

74.0

84.2

95.1

106.6

118.8

43.5

47.4

55.6

64.5

74.0

84.2

95.1

106.6

118.8

47.2

51.4

60.4

70.0

80.4

91.4

103.2

115.7

129.0

50.3

54.8

64.3

74.6

85.7

97.5

110.0

123.4

137.4

52.8

57.5

67.5

78.3

89.9

102.3

115.5

129.4

144.2

0-15

52.8

57.5

67.5

78.3

89.9

102.3

115.5

129.4

144.2

55.9

60.9

71.5

82.9

95.2

108.3

122.3

137.1

152.7

60.9

66.3

77.8

90.3

103.6

117.9

133.1

149.2

166.3

64.6

70.4

82.6

95.8

110.0

125.1

141.3

158.4

176.5

67.8

73.8

86.6

100.4

115.3

131.2

148.1

166.0

184.9

70.2

76.5

89.8

104.1

119.5

136.0

153.5

172.1

191.7

0-15

64.0

69.7

81.8

94.9

108.9

123.9

139.9

156.9

174.8

67.1

73.1

85.8

99.5

114.2

130.0

146.7

164.5

183.2

72.1

78.5

92.1

106.9

122.7

139.6

157.6

176.7

196.8

75.8

82.6

96.9

112.4

129.0

146.8

165.7

185.8

207.0

78.9

86.0

100.9

117.0

134.3

152.8

172.5

193.4

215.5

81.4

88.7

104.1

120.7

138.5

157.6

177.9

199.5 12/31/20 222.3

Notes: 1. The pressures (psf) in the above table are indicative of the design forces the underlayment must meet. 2. The above table was prepared to help identify the uplift resistance for 30/90 underlayment system fastening options found in Table 1. The uplift resistance would be the same values for any underlayment system. 3. For actual uplift resistance values for Foam Adhesives or Mortar installations, please see the underlayment and adhesive manufacturer's formal Product Approvals for additional information. 30

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

APPENDIX A

TABLE 1A

Notes:

For buildings with a mean roof height greater than 30 ft (9.1 m), Exposure B shall apply where Surface Roughness B prevails in the upwind direction for a distance greater than 2,600 ft (792 m) or 20 times the

6th EDITION

height of the building, whichever is greater. Exposure C – Exposure C shall apply for all cases where Exposures B or D do not apply. Exposure D – Exposure D shall apply where the

FRSA–TRI

Continued on page 32

TABLE 2 HB

Hip Roof – ASCE 7-16 Exposure B – Tile Factor = 1.407 ft3 Mean Roof Heights (ft) 0-30

Less than 4.5:12

0-30

4.5:12 to less than 6:12

0-30

40 6:12 to 12:12 50

115

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

Ma (ft-lbf)

LPZ

12.2

13.3

15.6

18.1

20.8

23.7

26.8

30.0

33.4

HPZ

12.2

13.3

15.6

18.1

20.8

23.7

26.8

30.0

33.4

LPZ

13.3

14.5

17.0

19.7

22.6

25.7

29.1

32.6

36.3

HPZ

13.3

14.5

17.0

19.7

22.6

25.7

29.1

32.6

36.3

LPZ

14.2

15.4

18.1

21.0

24.1

27.4

31.0

34.7

38.7

HPZ

14.2

15.4

18.1

21.0

24.1

27.4

31.0

34.7

38.7

LPZ

14.9

16.2

19.0

22.0

25.3

28.8

32.5

36.4

40.6

HPZ

14.9

16.2

19.0

22.0

25.3

28.8

32.5

36.4

40.6

LPZ

10.2

11.1

13.0

15.1

17.4

19.8

22.3

25.0

27.9

HPZ

10.2

11.1

13.0

15.1

17.4

19.8

22.3

25.0

27.9

LPZ

11.1

12.1

14.2

16.4

18.8

21.4

24.2

27.1

30.2

HPZ

11.1

12.1

14.2

16.4

18.8

21.4

24.2

27.1

30.2

LPZ

11.8

12.9

15.1

17.5

20.1

22.9

25.8

28.9

32.2

HPZ

11.8

12.9

15.1

17.5

20.1

22.9

25.8

28.9

32.2

LPZ

12.4

13.5

15.8

18.4

21.1

24.0

27.1

30.4

33.8

HPZ

12.4

13.5

15.8

18.4

21.1

24.0

27.1

30.4

33.8

LPZ

12.9

14.1

16.5

19.2

22.0

25.0

28.2

31.7

35.3

HPZ

15.6

17.0

20.0

23.2

26.6

30.3

34.2

38.3

42.7

LPZ

14.0

15.3

17.9

20.8

23.9

27.2

30.7

34.4

38.3

HPZ

17.0

18.5

21.7

25.2

28.9

32.9

37.1

41.6

46.4

LPZ

15.0

16.3

19.1

22.2

25.4

29.0

32.7

36.6

40.8

HPZ

18.1

19.7

23.1

26.8

30.8

35.0

39.6

44.4

49.4

LPZ

15.7

17.1

20.1

23.3

26.7

30.4

34.3

38.5

42.8

HPZ

19.0

20.7

24.3

28.2

32.3

36.8

41.5

46.5

51.9

Roof Zones

LPZ - Low Pressure Zones 1, 2e & 2r for Hip Roofs. HPZ - High Pressure Zones 3 for Hip Roofs. h/B ≤ 0.80 values used where applicable (most conservative). Wind speeds are Vult. Refer to the tile manufacturer for additional information. See Figure 1.0 on pg. 23 (of the Tile Manual) for additional details on roof zone designations. FRSA-TRI Florida High Wind Concrete and Clay Tile Installation Manual – 6th Edition 12/31/2031 www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

APPENDIX A

Roof Slopes

FBCB Table 1609.3.1 Design Wind Speed Conversion (mph) Vult

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

Vasd

101

108

116

124

132

139

147

ground surface roughness, as defined by Surface Roughness D, prevails in the upwind direction for a distance greater than 5,000 ft (1,524 m) or 20 times the building height, whichever is greater. Exposure D shall also apply where the ground surface roughness immediately upwind of the site is B or C and the site is within a distance of 600 ft (183 m) or 20 times the building height, whichever is greater, from an Exposure D condition as defined in the previous sentence.

6th 6th EDITION 6th EDITION EDITION

Design Considerations for High Wind Applications Under ASCE 7-16 Requirements

Please refer to the manufacturer’s valid code approval for additional wind design details. The installation requirements in the Table 2 series provide the normal installation guidelines for concrete and clay tile to comply with the FBC and IBC. The

21 FRSA–TRI 21 FRSA–TRIFRSA–TRI

FOR ASCE 7-16 FOR WIND ASCE DESIGNS, 7-16 WIND THE DESIGNS, FOLLOWING THE ROOF FOLLOWING ZONE FIGURES ROOF ZONE AREFIGURES A FOR ASCE 7-16 WIND DESIGNS, THE FOLLOWING ROOF ZONE FIGURES ARE INCLUDED ASINCLUDED A REFERENCE AS A REFERENCE TO THE TABLE TOCALCULATIONS THE TABLE CALCULATIONS INCLUDED AS A REFERENCE TO THE TABLE CALCULATIONS APPENDIX APPENDIXAA

2r 2r

1 1

2e1 1

a a

3e2n

2n3e

3r 3r

2e 2e

1 1

2r 2r

2e1 1

12e 2e

3e 3e

2n 2n

3r 3r 3e2n 3r 3r 2n PLAN PLAN

2n3e

3r 3r

3r 3r 3r 3r

12e 2ea

2r 2r

1 3

PLAN PLAN

2e 2e

2r 2r

2n 2n

3 3

PLAN

a a

3e 3e

a 1 1

aa aa

3 3 a a

1 1

3 3

2e 2e

3 3

Figure 1.0 Hip RoofFigure Zone Designations 1.0 Hip Roof Zone Designations Figure 2.0 Gable Roof Figure Zone 2.0 Designations Gable Roof Zone Designations Figure 1.0 Hip Roof Zone Designations Figure 2.0 Gable Roof Zone Designations a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

PLAN

= High pressure zones = High = 3pressure zones = 3 = High pressure zones = High = 3e pressure & 3r zones = 3e & 3r = High pressure zones = 3 = High pressure zones = 3e & 3r Other = Low pressure Other zones = Low = 1,pressure 2e & 2r zones = 1, 2e & 2r Other = Low pressure Other zones = Low = 1,pressure 2e, 2r &zones 2n = 1, 2e, 2r & 2n Other = Low pressure zones = 1, 2e & 2r Other = Low pressure zones = 1, 2e, 2r & 2n Θ Θ

MRH MRH

h h B B

Width Width

Θ Θ

Width

MRH

B B

Width Width

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

Width

a = 10% of the width a =or10% 40%ofofthe thewidth height, or 40% whichever of theisheight, smaller, whichever but not less is smaller, than 3 but ft. not less than 3 ft. a = 10% of the (or width orThe 40%width of whichever is smaller, but not than 3 ft. The width dimension B),the shall (orheight, dimension not include B), the shall overhang. not include the less overhang. The width (or dimension B), shall not include the overhang. B = Horizontal dimension B = Horizontal of the building dimension in feet. of the building in feet. B = Horizontal dimension of the building in feet. h = Mean Roof Height h = Mean (MRH)Roof in feet Height (eave(MRH) heightinplus feetridge (eaveheight heightdivided plus ridge by 2). height divided by 2). h = Mean Roof Height (MRH) in feet (eave height plus ridge height divided by 2). Θ = Angle of roof plane Θ = Angle from horizontal of roof plane in degrees from horizontal (slope or inpitch). degrees (slope or pitch). Θ = Angle of roof plane from horizontal in degrees (slope or pitch). 32

MRH MRH

h h

MRH

installation of tile in the specific regions of the country that are identified by FBC/IBC as subjected to wind speeds in excess of 110 miles per hour (Vasd), may be required to have additional fastening options not found in Table 3. TRI has derived various uplift resistance values for nail, screws and adhesive fastening systems on plywood sheathing. Some of these methods of installation may have limiting factors depending upon wind speed, roof slope and roof height. Please consult with your tile, underlayment and adhesive manufacturers or design professional for additional information about these optional systems for those unique installations. The following design aids are provided to the roof designer for consideration in determining the required aerodynamic uplift moment for roof tiles for wind applications beyond the prescriptive requirements in

FRSA–TRI

the FBC. These tables were developed based on the requirements of ASCE 7-16 for a tile factor of 1.407 ft3. The tile factor (TF) is determined from the following equation: TF = b*L*La(ft3) where: b = exposed width (ft) L = roof tile length (ft) La = 0.76*L Or, use the tile factor ratio that provides the ratio of the actual tile to the 1.407 (ft3) that some manufacturers have in their formal Product Approvals. Conversion to nominal design wind speed Vasd from ultimate design wind speed Vult shall be converted as:

6th EDITION Continued on page 34

ASCE 7-16 WIND MAP

120

130

115

140 150

130 120

140 150

140

LIN

150 ER

140

SUMT

APPENDIX A

Ultimate Design Wind Speeds, Vult, For Risk Category II Buildings and Other Structures

160 Notes: Values are ultimate design 3-second gust wind speeds in miles per hour at 33 feet (10m) above ground for Exposure C category. Linear interploation between contours is permitted. Islands and coastal areas outside the last contour shall use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area. Mountainous terrain, gorges, ocean promontories and special wind regions shall be examined for unusual wind conditions. Wind speeds correspond to approximately a 7% probability of exceedance in 50 years (Annual Exceedance Probability = 0.00143, MRI = 700 years).

170

150 160 170

180 180

www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

Notes:

ATC Hazards by Location

3/21/21, 2:26 PM

Hazards by Location Search Information Address:

4111 Metric Dr, Winter Park, FL 32792, USA

Coordinates:

28.6000659, -81.2908941

Elevation:

85 ft

Timestamp:

2021-03-21T18:25:40.607Z

Hazard Type:

ASCE 7-16

■ Vasd = Vult * √0.6 or from FBCB Table 7-05 1609.3.1 (page 32, top); taASCE bles were calculated using Vasd.

ASCE 7-10

MRI 10-Year

80 mph

MRI 10-Year

80 mph

■ ASCE For SI: 1 mile hour = 0.44 7-05 Windper Speed 106 m/s. mph A linear interpolation is permitted.

MRI 25-Year

93 mph

MRI 25-Year

93 mph

MRI 50-Year

104 mph

MRI 50-Year

104 mph

■ From the Florida Building Code, Building 7th Edition Table 1609.3.1.

MRI 100-Year

113 mph

MRI 100-Year

113 mph

Risk Category I

126 mph

Risk Category I

126 mph

Risk Category II

! 136 mph

Risk Category II

! 136 mph

You are in a wind-borne debris region if 3/21/21, 2:26 PM you are also within 1 mile of the coastal mean high water line. Risk Category III

! 144 mph

If the structure under consideration is a healthcare facility and you are also within 1 mile of the coastal mean high water 85 line,ftyou are in a wind-borne debris region. If other occupancy, use the Risk Category II basic wind speed contours to determine if you are in a wind-borne debris region. Risk Category IV

! 149 mph

ASCE 7-05

You are in a wind-borne debris region if you are also within 1 mile of the coastal mean high water line. Risk Category III-IV

! 144 mph

If the structure under consideration is a healthcare facility and you are also within 1 mile of the coastal mean high water line, you are in a windborne debris region. If other occupancy, use the Risk Category II basic wind speed contours to determine if you are in a wind-borne debris region.

Establishing Wind Speed

Applied Technology Council (ATC) is a nonprofit corporation whose mission is to develop and promote state-of-the-art, user-friendly engineering resources and applications for use in mitigating the effects of natural and other hazards on the built environment. It offers a wind speed calculator on its website at www.atcouncil.org/windspeed that provides users with site-specific hazard information that can be used to determine design loads for buildings and other structures. Values are site-specific for the location entered and users are cautioned to provide the most accurate location for the building or structure site by specifying either the known street address, city and state or the latitude and longitude to at least five decimal places. The report generated on this page (left) shows the wind speed at Risk Category I at 126 mph. You’ll include this information in the design flow chart for project location.

https://hazards.atcouncil.org/#/wind?lat=28.6000659&lng=-81.2…11%20Metric%20Dr%2C%20Winter%20Park%2C%20FL%2032792%2C%20USA

0 mph

ASCE 7-05 Wind Speed

Drawings 106 mph

3 mph

4 mph

85 ft

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

Page 1 of 2

In the 6th Edition, you’ll find cleaner and more detailed drawings that more accurately reflect roof diagrams. You’ll still need to

reference the manual text and refer to drawings throughout. FRSA provides one complimentary manual to members and additional manuals can be purchased. Please contact Maria Armas at 800-767-3772 ext. 142 or by email at maria@floridaroof.com. I’ve highlighted some of the changes to the 6th Edition manual and encourage you and your crew to attend the continuing education seminar being offered in-person on May 19 at FRSA’s Training Center, online at www.floridaroof.com or at FRSA’s Convention, July 21-23 at Gaylord Palms Resort. If you need more information on seminars, please contact John Hellein at 800-767-3772 ext. 123 or by email at john@floridaroof.com. FRM

Manuel ““Manny” Oyola, Jr., Eagle Roofing Products, holds a roofing contractors license and is an active member of the Tile Roofing Industry Alliance (TRI) and the Palm Beach County Roofing & Sheet Metal Contractors Association, the local FRSA Affiliate.

He is also an active member of FRSA’s Codes Committee, chairs the Codes Subcommittee and participates on the FRSA-TRI Manual Reformatting Committee. Manny teaches roof tile courses for TRI and FRSA.

Workers' Comp Insurance Code and Technical Support Roof Loans For more information, contact Maria at maria@floridaroof.com - 800-767-3772 ext. 142 www.floridaroof.com www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

OSHA UPDATES

OSHA Issues New COVID-19 Guidance

On January 21, the day after being sworn into office, President Biden issued an Executive Order on Protecting Worker Health and Safety. The Executive Order directed the Secretary of Labor to issue, within two weeks of the date of the Order, revised guidance to employers on workplace safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Less than 10 days later, OSHA released updated guidance for mitigating and preventing the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. The guidance suggests that the most effective way to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace is to implement a COVID-19 prevention program. It includes suggestions for an effective COVID-19 prevention program, including but not limited to, the following elements: ■ Assignment of a workplace coordinator responsible for COVID-19 issues. ■ Education and training workers on COVID-19 policies and procedures using accessible formats and in a language they understand. ■ Providing face coverings to employees at no cost. ■ Making a COVID-19 vaccine or vaccination series available at no cost to all eligible employees. ■ Consider protection for workers at higher risk for severe illness through supportive policies and practices. ■ Performing enhanced cleaning and disinfection after workers with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 have been in the facility (this includes closing areas, and cleaning and disinfecting all immediate work areas and equipment). ■ Employers must implement protection from retaliation and set up an anonymous process for workers to voice concerns about COVID-19 related hazards. ■ Not distinguishing between workers who are vaccinated and those who are not. ■ Minimizing the negative impact of quarantine and isolation on workers (allow workers to use paid sick leave and the Families First Coronavirus Response Act paid leave). ■ Implementing quarantine and isolation rules consistent with CDC guidance. OSHA’s updated guidance also includes links to industry-specific guidance. The construction industry guidance suggests various engineering and administrative controls, as well as safe work practices, for the workplace depending on the exposure risk level associated with construction work tasks. Notably, OSHA does suggest requiring construction workers to wear cloth face coverings in construction. 36

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

Importantly, the guidance does make it expressly clear that it is not a standard or regulation and it creates no new legal obligations for employers. The guidance is intended to provide recommendations, as well as descriptions of existing mandatory safety and health standards. The recommendations are advisory in nature, informational in content and are intended to assist employers in recognizing and abating hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm as part of their obligation to provide a safe and healthful workplace.

OSHA’S Penalty Amounts Increase for 2021 For 2021, penalties for an other-than-serious violation, a serious violation and a failure-to-abate violation increased to $13,653, which represents a $159 increase over these same penalties in 2020. Willful and repeat violations now have a maximum penalty amount of $136,532 per violation, which represents an increase of $1,626 over last year’s maximum penalty amount for willful or repeat violations. In light of this increase in OSHA penalty amounts and the fact that the Biden administration promises increased enforcement efforts, it is a good time to revisit your company safety program to make sure you are taking those steps necessary to defeat a citation based on the unforeseeable employee misconduct defense. To establish the affirmative defense of unforeseeable employee misconduct, an employer must show that it: 1. Established work rules designed to prevent the violative conditions from occurring, 2. Adequately communicated those rules to its employees, 3. Took steps to discover violations of those rules, and 4. Effectively enforced the rules when violations were discovered. While most roofing contractors have work rules, provide training, inspect their jobsites and discipline employees who violate safety rules, it is absolutely imperative that documents are maintained that provide evidence of the same and that the company’s safety program, especially its disciplinary component, is effective such that violations are truly unforeseeable. Even verbal reprimands should be documented. All documents which would support the affirmative defense of unforeseeable employee misconduct should be well organized and stored in a safe place for easy access in the event the company is cited for an OSHA violation.

FRM

$6,000,000

is a lot of MONEY! That is how much money the FRSA Self Insurers Fund returned in dividends to its members at last year’s FRSA Convention and Expo.

UN D

Call the FRSA-SIF today to see if you qualify and to find out how you can save the most for the best Workers’ Compensation Insurance Coverage for your business and your employees!

S E L F INS

800-767-3772 ext. 206 alexis@frsasif.com

COTNEY CONSULTING GROUP John Kenney

Improving Productivity in Roofing Last month we discussed the many aspects that go into improving productivity. This month, we will cover how you remain productive and keep your workforce safe.

and buildings to use for estimates and measurements. These high-quality photos account for gables and eaves and other features Remaining Productive Amid So Much in calculating the total roof Change area. Roofing companies worldwide are seeking ways to A more recent innovation remain productive in these unsettling times while is 3D modeling, already bekeeping employees healthy. Roofers are at the foreing adopted by roofers. Use front of finding options to continue working, even for it to measure the total area tasks that previously required humans at the job site. of a roof needing repairs, Those options include the use of drones, 3D model- to order only the necessary ing and aerial imaging systems. amount of materials for the It is difficult and dangerous to climb on damaged job and to show the homeroofs to assess needed repairs even when there is owner what certain roof systems would look like on his or her house before making a final decision. no global pandemic. Damaged or rotting roof decks, And then, of course, there is the smartphone. broken materials and downed electrical wires make Probably 99.9 percent of roofing contractors carry this hazardous work. By using drones, roofers can get one, so why not use it to improve job site productivity? a safe, close-up view of rooftop surfaces. Mobile technology allows you to connect with your Use camera-equipped drones to inspect the roof, crew in the field to ensure you make timely decisions. chimneys and vents and decide which materials are This reduces the margin of error, which can otherwise necessary for roof repairs without workers ever leaving the ground. This can save hours on a project. There cost your company significantly. On-the-go technology, like phones and tablets, can are restrictions on drone use in some areas, so check also help you attract and retain new customers. For with your local government offices. example, many customers want to see what their finUse aerial imaging to review roof repairs safely. ished roof will look like before deciding whether to hire Roofing contractors can use aerial imaging systems to estimate roof repairs while sitting in their car or at a roofing company. By having a tablet or laptop handy, their office. The software takes existing aerial and sat- you can show them material options, design and cost. ellite images and enhances them, allowing contractors This allows customers to make quick decisions. This to quickly provide measurements over a wide area, for can be especially useful when selling residential roofexample, after a hurricane or tornado blows through. ing. The ability to show a client what their roof will look As aerial photographers continue to refine their like is a big win. work, roofers can purchase photographs of properties Building information models (BIM) is another handy tool to help you increase productivity. It creates a digital image of a structure before roofing work begins. The digital programming allows the building’s owner to make smart decisions during the construction project by providing scheduling information and it helps ensure the project stays on target. Once a roof is complete, BIM provides notices and schedules for maintenance and repair. It can also provide projections on maintenance costs. This is an essential tool for roofers working with other contractors to erect new buildings. These processes all allow roofing contractors to streamline their work for tasks that are otherwise manual and time consuming. As you add new technology and software prohttps://www.bidpal.net/frsacharity grams, measure your level of productivity. Using this

2020-2021 Charity of Choice

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

MAKE YOUR NEXT ROOF YOUR LAST

Why partner with us?

introducing There are many advantages for roofing contractors to do business with Tri County Metals.

NEXT DAY DELIVERY

AMERICAN MADE

Produced in Trenton, Florida.

Order by 4, out the door. For all exposed fastener panels.

TEXT NOTIFICATIONS

Stay informed with this free service.

AND SO MUCH MORE • • • • • • • •

OVER $5.5 MILLION IN INVENTORY FULLY STOCKED PUSH PAY / PAY VIA TEXT FREE LEADS FOR EDGE PARTNERS CONTRACTOR SUPPORT CENTER SCHEDULING DEPARTMENT SAME-DAY PICKUP @ TRENTON ON-TIME / COMPLETE OVER 99%

Schedule a call partner with us

CUSTOMER PORTAL

FACTORY TRAINING

View invoices. Pay bills. Duplicate Orders.

Programs to help make you money. TriCountyMetals.com/partner

877-766-3309 • TriCountyMetals.com • info@tricountymetals.com TRENTON • LIVE OAK • OCALA • TALLAHASSEE • BROOKSVILLE • DELAND • JACKSONVILLE

data, your management team can pinpoint flaws in a crew’s workflow and streamline processes. A performance-based incentive program can also be used by rewarding your crew and supervisors who meet or beat budget benchmarks, encouraging efficient project workflow. There is also software to help keep you organized when you have multiple client projects going at once. It can help improve your teams’ project visibility and allow customers to track their projects in real-time while you track your labor. More than 60 percent of roofing companies lag behind in the use of technology to improve productivity. They continue to rely on manual and paper processes that do not help increase productivity. Technology gives you and your company a competitive edge, so leverage available technology to improve your business.

other crew members, contractors or visitors, staying at least six feet apart. ■ Promote personal hygiene. Encourage employees to wash their hands regularly or use alcohol-based hand sanitizer with at least 60 percent alcohol. ■ Use Environmental Protection Agency-approved cleaning chemicals. ■ Encourage workers to report any health concerns. These tips are all designed to keep workers healthy during the pandemic. Keeping workers healthy will allow your business to continue at a productive pace. In conclusion, by improving communication and processes, adopting new technologies and following guidelines to keep workers safe, roofing companies can continually find new ways to improve productivity. These combined effects can help increase your bottom line even in these challenging times.

FRM

Stay Healthy, Stay Productive

Yes, a vaccine is finally rolling out to prevent the further spread of the sometimes-deadly COVID-19 virus. But the process will be slow going and you must continue to keep your crew safe and healthy during this taxing time. Doing so is not only the right thing to do, but it will also help you keep your company productive. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued guidelines for safe working in April 2020 and companies should continue to follow them. ■ If workers are sick, encourage them to stay home. ■ Ensure your workers know how to properly wear face masks over their noses and to mask-up when working within six feet of each other.

John Kenney has over 45-plus years of experience in the roofing industry. He started his career by working as a roofing apprentice at a family business in the Northeast and worked his way up to operating multiple Top 100 Roofing Contractors. As CEO, John is intimately familiar with all aspects of roofing production, estimating and operations. During his tenure in the industry, John ran business units associated with delivering excellent workmanship and unparalleled customer service while ensuring his company’s strong net profits before joining Cotney Consulting Group. If you would like any further information on this or another subject, you can contact John at jkenney@cotneyconsulting.com.

■ Use personal protective equipment on job sites to protect workers from hazards. ■ Advise workers to avoid physical contact with

THE

POLYSET PROMISE ®

ALWAYS DELIVER BEST IN-CLASS TRAINING & FIELD SUPPORT NEARLY 30 YEARS OF PRODUCT CREDIBILITY in the market of concrete and clay roof tile adhesives. MASTERWORKS QUALIFIED APPLICATOR TRAINING provides continuous hands-on training, ensuring projects meet code compliance, while delivering The Polyset Promise. QUALIFIED APPLICATOR CARDS that have industry credibility and acceptance are provided upon completing the Qualified Applicator training program.

Visit www.PolysetAdhesives.com for more information.

2775 Barber Road | Norton, OH 44203 330-753-4585 | www.icpgroup.com

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

ASTM Underlayment, continued from page 13

The next step in this process is to propose inclusion of the new standard into the Florida Building Code. This work is currently underway and there are many industry stakeholders that are in support of this effort, including FRSA. The underlayment technology available today provides a much more diverse array of products. Product innovation continues to improve existing products and provide an even wider variety of products to complete your next job.

FRM

Greg Keeler is the Technical Services Leader for Owens Corning Roofing and Asphalt, LLC. Greg has been with Owens Corning for 9 years and has 36 years of experience in architecture and spent 24 years as a building official. He serves on and chairs several task groups within ASTM D08, Committee on Roofing and Waterproofing, and the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturer’s Association. He also serves on the UL Standards Technical Panels for UL 790, UL 2218 and UL 580/1897 and on FRSA’s Codes Committee and Codes Subcommittee.

Polyurethane Adhesives, continued from page 16

the technical support for their products and compliance with the authorities having jurisdiction (AHJ). As time goes on, it is in the best interest of the roofing contractor to be partnered with companies that will support growth of their companies, provide training and education for installers and introduce the technology of what is possible with polyurethane-based adhesives and insulation.

FRM

Riku Ylipelkonen, EIT, MBA, AM ASCE, is the Technical Service Manager for Roofing Products at ICP Building Solutions Group. Riku has earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Kettering University (formerly the General Motors Institute) and an MBA from Florida Gulf Coast University. Riku is a registered EIT in the State of Florida, has been granted two patents by the US Patent and Trademark Office and is an associate member of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Riku started in the roofing industry in 2008 working for Polyfoam Products, Inc., then 3M and currently for ICP BSG. Riku volunteers with FRSA, ASCE Wind Load Committee, Tile Roofing Industry Alliance and other local roofing associations as time permits. Riku finds the opportunity to be a technical and engineering advocate for the roofing industry very rewarding. He enjoys boating and cool cars in his free time.

www.floridaroof.com | FLORIDA ROOFING

Russ Lynn, GAF, Florida Regional Sales Director Commercial Roofing Products, 15 years How did you get started in the roofing industry? After graduating from college with a degree in Architecture, I accepted my first job with an architectural firm in Orlando that specialized in commercial roof consulting. It was a relatively small firm and offered the opportunity to learn a lot about the industry from the consultant’s side. After spending 12 years there I accepted a position with a large commercial roofing contractor in Central Florida. For the next 9 years, I quickly came to realize that this part of the industry is where the rubber meets the road or, more appropriately, where the asphalt meets the roof. I learned a lot about this part of the industry. From sales and estimating to operations and service, there was a great deal to learn. After getting my contractor’s license, I eventually became responsible for managing the business.

had. He left us too soon. Michelangelo – In my opinion, the greatest artist of all time. To be able to gain some insight into how his mind’s eye communicates with his hands would be inspiring for me. How long have you been involved with FRSA? In total, my entire career, 36 years. What do you personally find most rewarding about being involved with FRSA? The people and the professionalism of everyone involved. The value that FRSA brings to this industry is unsurpassed.

What advice would you give to someone interested in joining the roofing industry? Learn as much as you can and don’t get intimidated by some of the technical aspects. Jump in with both feet and go “all in” before others beat you to it. It’s the best career What’s your favorite part of the job? The people, hands down! This industry is full of good, hard choice I could have made. What’s your favorite pastime activity? working people in all areas. It’s often said that it’s a small Anything that gets me out on the water. industry: once you’re in, it’s hard to get out. What’s the most unusual roofing project that you’ve been a part of? The preparation of construction documents for the reroofing of the VAB building at NASA. The final reroofing of that project happened a long time after the initial specifications were prepared. What do you consider a waste of time? Worrying. Nothing is accomplished by worrying. What’s your favorite vacation? Spending the week at Longboat key with my family. What is your dream job? I think I have my dream job! But if I had to pick another one, it would be a bridge builder. Connecting two pieces of land separated by water, working from barges with steel and concrete. What a challenge and what an opportunity to create a work of art. If you could spend time with three people (living or not), who would they be and why? Jesus Christ – What an absolutely AWESOME experience that would be. My Dad – What a man! What talents he 42

FLORIDA ROOFING | April 2021

What would be your ideal place to live and why? I’m living there now: St Petersburg, Fla. The water, the beaches, the fishing, downtown, the arts – you name it, we love it here. What other activities and organizations are you involved with? I collect driftwood and have a passion for carving fish from unique pieces. The last few years I donated two pieces to the RCASF’s (Roofing Contractor Association of S FL) art auction during their annual fishing tournament. The proceeds went to the Children’s Make a Wish Foundation. I was extremely honored to be able to donate these to support such a worthy cause. What would surprise others to learn about you? I spent 24 years in the US Coast Guard (active and reserve). The experiences in Miami during the mid-1970’s were not much different than the TV show “Miami Vice,” for those who can remember that – never a dull moment. FRM

Risk Management Solutions You need to lower your risk, your claims, and your premiums. That’s where IOA experts and RiskScore® come in. RiskScore is like a credit score for your organization. It includes a brief survey that focuses on four key disciplines—pre-hire, post-hire, pre-claim, and post-claim. Once the survey is completed, an IOA risk expert provides a guided review and highlights areas that can be improved through a customized risk management plan.

RISKSCORE BENEFITS • •

• •

Like a credit score, the better your score, the better your terms and conditions. Your internal gap analysis identifies areas of strength and opportunity to build your team. Best practices are identified to help mitigate overall business exposure. Empirical data begins the pre-audit process for underwriters.

For more information, contact: Phillip Lane, CLCS Commercial Agent

Direct: 321.433.4004 Email: phillip.lane@ioausa.com

BIPL0420 - 316

25 years OF DELIVERING ON OUR PROMISE OF

product availability, fast and reliable service, AND industry expertise.

Established in 1996.

Thank you to all our employees, customers, and the industry for your contribution to our success.

1.888.393.0335 www.GulfCoastSupply.com

METAL ROOFING PRODUCTS

What are YOU waiting for? Your brand could reach 5,000+ roofing professionals each month. Advertise with Florida Roofing TODAY! Print & Digital advertising space available for 2021. Reserve your ads today! Questions? Contact Kelsey O'Hearne 800-767-3772 ext. 127 | kelsey@floridaroof.com

Concrete Tile Roofing Systems Gorgeous Curb Appeal. Proven, Unrivaled Performance. For over 30 years, Eagle Roofing Products has been a trusted partner and friend to homebuilders and roofers alike; providing gorgeous concrete roof tile products comprised of rich color palettes, exquisite profiles and contrasting textures that beautifully complement both Classical and Modern design styles. Our efforts have evolved in providing our customers with two complete systems designed to enhance the overall performance of the roof system.

The Dual Fix Hybrid System The Dual Fix Hybrid System is a dynamic concrete tile roof system that combines the attachment advantages of tile screws with the added uplift resistance of single component tile adhesive. This system provides maximum durability and protection, withstanding speeds of up to 180mph.

The Ventilated Roof System The Ventilated Roof System is a smart, effective concrete tile roof system that focuses on energy efficiency, savings and performance. It is comprised of three key components—Ventilated Eave Closures, Eagle’s Arched Battens and O’Hagin Attic Vents—designed to facilitate airflow and reduce heat transfer from the attic into the overall living space, resulting in less energy usage.

For more information on Eagle and our concrete tile roofing systems, visit eagleroofing.com

Florida Roofing - April 2021

Articles inside

Training, Codes, Legislation and Research are on FRSA’s Horizon

Polyurethane Adhesives and Insulation

Synthetic Underlayments: New ASTM Standard Replaces Felt Standards