ARCH513 - Integrated Project Design Studio - Amanda Thisdale SP22

Page 1

Basel, Switzerland ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022


AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY

AMANDA THISDALE PROFESSOR ROBERTO VIOLA OCHOA ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN SPRING 2022



TABLE OF CONTENTS:

1 - SITE AND ITS CONTEXT..................................................................................................4 2 - PRELIMINARY SITE AND BUILDING STRATEGIES......................................................52 3 - DEVELOPMENT OF PRELIMINARY DESIGN................................................................86 4 - STRUCTURE...................................................................................................................174 5 - PASSIVE/ACTIVE STRATEGIES..................................................................................184 6 - ENCLOSURE.................................................................................................................204 7 - FINAL NARRATIVE........................................................................................................212 8 - BLACK AND WHITE SET 9 - REFERENCES


1 SITE AND ITS CONTEXT


TABLE OF CONTENTS

REGIONAL INFORMATION.......................................................................................6 SWITZERLAND AND SURROUNDING REGION RHINE RIVER REGION & ITS MUNICIPALITIES

MUNICIPAL INFORMATION..................................................................................10 BASEL AS A CULTURAL CENTER BASEL AS A TOURISM HUB MORPHOLOGY DISTRICTS OF BASEL CLIMATE

SITE INFORMATION.................................................................................................34 SITE 1 - CENTRAL BASEL SITE 2 - AUGUSTA RAURICA


Basel, Switzerland

Basel is a major city located on the Rhine River in the north-western part of Switzerland. Situated within close proximity to the borders of France and Germany; Basel shares many cultural and architectural similarities with the surrounding towns and cities. Originally settled by the Gaelic people sometime within the 5th century BCE; the site eventually came under Roman control in the 3rd century BCE. Falling out of Roman control into the rule of the Franks eventually the city was destroyed and integrated into the Holy Roman Empire, before finally gaining its independence in 1400 and then joining the swiss confederation in 1501. Within the city and the city extent, the historic development of Basel can be seen and understood. With Roman ruins on the outskirts and well-preserved portions of a major medieval city located within. Settlement and development of Basel over the centuries have led to the city becoming the third-largest city in Switzerland. The long and storied history of the city has led to the area being seen as a cultural and artistic hub within Europe since the early renaissance. With a rich history in supporting and displaying the arts, Basel has thrived and turned into a modern Swiss city; which contributes vastly to the economic and political power of Switzerland as a whole.

Swedish Cantons

Basel-Stadt Canton

Swedish Map with Cantons

Basel Prince-Bisphoric Region as part of Holy Roman Empire


Switzerland

Despite sharing borders with Austria, France, Germany, Liechtenstein, and Italy; Switzerland remains one of the major countries in continental Europe to not be part of the European Union. However, despite this, they maintain good relations with all European Union countries and thrive as their own economic and political force. Switzerland has more recently played a watchers role on the world’s stage as they maintain their neutrality in all world political and armed conflicts. Switzerland has developed into one of the world’s economic centers for banking, finance, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Similar to other major European nations, Switzerland has a large and healthy tourism industry. With banking, finance, and tourism making up a large part of the service industry that comprises roughly 70% of the Swiss economy. The remainder of the Swiss economy consists of agricultural production and industrial production. The Swiss economy is supported and stabilized by the relative stability of the country and its currency. Unlike most countries, Swiss politics and government are organized around a decentralized system. Which leads to a low power national government and more powerful regional governments. Switzerland is broken up into 26 different cantons and each canton acts similarly to that of a state within the United States. However, cantons are essentially autonomous sovereign bodies just controlled by one central government. However, their sovereignty cannot be limited by federal law. Cantons have their own constitutions, legislatures, courts, etc. essentially acting as a small country contained within the holistic country of Switzerland. Basel is located within Basel-Stadt Canton, the smallest canton area-wise; yet home to the third-largest city in switzerland. Basel being one of the largest cities in Switzerland has led to a regional power struggle between themselves and Zurich as to which city is the regional urban center of northern Switzerland. The major urban cities of Switzerland are spread so far apart that it has caused cities to


Karlsruhe Copyright © 2005. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.

Major Roads

Main roads

Geographically

Copyright © 2005. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.

Typology Diagram 129

Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., De, M. P., Schmid, C., Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., & de, M. P. (2005). Switzerland - an urban portrait : Vol. 1: introduction; vol. 2: borders, communes - a brief history of the territory; vol. 3: materials. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. Created from rwu on 2022-01-31 18:21:13.

45

Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., De, M. P., Schmid, C., Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., & de, M. P. (2005). Switzerland - an urban portrait : Vol. 1: introduction; vol. 2: borders, communes - a brief history of the territory; vol. 3: materials. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. Created from rwu on 2022-01-31 18:13:34.

Copyright © 2005. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.

Switzerland is largely a mountainous country with a smattering of large lakes spread throughout the country. The major mountain ranges consist of the swiss alps and its subsidiaries running south to east and the Jura mountains running from west to north. These mountain ranges are separated by what is commonly called the swiss plateau which is a relatively flat portion of the country compared to the more mountainous regions. However, the plateau still consists of mostly hilly terrain with the occasional lake. The portion of the Alps that runs through south eastern Switzerland is just a small portion of the greater mountain range that stretches from down near Monaco over northern Italy through Austria parts of Germany and then down through the countries of: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and montenegro to eventually end at the Adriatic Sea in Albania.

Strasbourg Copyright © 2005. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.

become densely populated. This has limited the development of urban sprawl into the pristine countryside; which is commonly seen within most European and western nations. This leads to large swatches of rural swiss land between densely populated urban centers. This spread has led to the development of extensive rail, road, and air networks to keep the country connected. Major highways cut through the countryside alongside major rail networks to act as methods of ground transportation. Whereas most if not all major cities have airports with the airport at Zurich receiving the most international air traffic. Regionally Switzerland receives lots of travel from their neighboring countries as they have open borders and open work agreements with most European Union countries.

Settlements

Freiburg Mulhouse Basel

Major Metropolitan Areas in Region

Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., De, M. P., Schmid, C., Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., & de, M. P. (2005). Switzerland - an urban portrait : Vol. 1: introduction; vol. 2: borders, communes - a brief history of the territory; vol. 3: materials. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. Created from rwu on 2022-01-31 18:28:57.

Settlements 43

Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., De, M. P., Schmid, C., Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., & de, M. P. (2005). Switzerland - an urban portrait : Vol. 1: introduction; vol. 2: borders, communes - a brief history of the territory; vol. 3: materials. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. Created from rwu on 2022-01-31 18:12:19.


Switzerland is home to several major rivers that run throughout not only the country but into other more expansive parts of Europe as a whole. The longest of these rivers is that of the Rhine River which originates in the south eastern part of the Swiss Alps and eventually terminates into the north sea after a 233 mile journey through most of switzerland parts of Austria, Liechtenstein, Germany, France, and the Netherlands. Other major rivers within Switzerland are those of the Aare, Rhône, Reuss, and Ticino all of which pass through or near major lakes and cities within the country. Several major lakes dominate the landscape of Switzerland and connect a large number of the rivers throughout the country. The two largest lakes are Lake Geneva and Lake Constance. Other major lakes include Lake Lucerne, Lake Zurich, and Lake Neuchâtel. All of these lakes connect to major and minor rivers and most feed into the Rhine at one point or another. The prominence of Rivers and Lakes have not gotten lost on the Swiss as they utilize these rivers as an important source of hydroelectric power production. A little over half the national power grid is generated by hydroelectric power. Switzerland does a fantastic job of utilizing its natural resources in a sustainable manner. Roughly 13% of the country is covered by nature parks; consisting of 19 different parks spread throughout the country. There is only one national park taken care of by the national government and that is located in the Swiss Alps and was founded in 1914. All other parks are maintained and managed by the respective Canton that they are located in. The largest park is Parc Ela located in the Canton of Graubünden. However, there are two such nature parks near the city of Basel with Park Argovia Jurapark located in the neighboring Canton of Aargau and the Thal Nature Park Located in the neighboring Canton of Solothurn.


Basel, as a city, is known as a cultural center within Europe. It was the city where the first public art collection in Europe was founded, and continues to be a center for the arts. Basel has a high concentration of museums in the Grossbasel center, which mainly consist of art museums and cultural museums. The most notable art museum is the Kunstmuseum, which is the name of the building that houses the first public art collection in Europe. Basel isn’t only known for its collections, but it is known for the buildings that house them as well. Many famous architects come from Switzerland, such as Herzog and deMueron, as well as Renzo Piano. These architects have made Basel a popular city for those who are looking for great architectural works. Some examples of contemporary architecture that Basel has to offer are the Museum der Kulturen by Herzog and deMueron, Fondation Beyeler by Renzo Piano, the Basel Exhibition Center by Herzog and deMueron, the Goetheanum by Rudolf Steiner, and the Vitra Design Museum by Frank Gehry.

Museum Location

Museum Concentration



Basel is a tourist destination in other ways than just art museums and contemporary architecture. Basel is most known for its medieval architecture in Old Town, located within the Grossbasel district. This center allows visitors to step back in time and discover the architecture that distinguishes Switzerland regionally. One of the more striking buildings within the Grossbasel center is the City Hall, which is painted a bright red color. The red represents the red sandstone from which the building was constructed from, but most of the building is painted and frescoed. The largest painted sculpture in the City Hall is of the founder of Augusta Raurica, tying the city and its ruins together. While Augusta Raurica is not technically within the city, it is what founded the city in the first place and is one of the more visited places when people come to the city. Basel is also very popular in shopping areas, such as in Kleinbasel, as well as popular for the arts, like music and theater. The Theater Basel is the longest running theater company in the city and has its roots downtown with a postmodernist building with a large fountain, making it an architectural destination within the city itself. Herzog and deMueron also designed the Stadtcasino, which is a musical venue where the theater itself is Baroque in design, but the rest of the interior is covered in bright red, contemporary design. This connects the building to the city with the red connection to the City Hall, as well as recognizes Basel as a landmark for contemporary architecture.

Tourist Attraction Location

Tourist Attraction Concentration



Basel has its foundation as an ancient settlement from roughly the 5th century BCE. Presumed to have been originally settled by the Celtic and Gaelic people the location upon the Rhine was an ideal space for settlement. The settlement fell into Roman hands in the 3rd century BCE as the expansion of the Roman Empire progressed further northward. In the 1st century BCE, the Romans built a fortified castle in the settlement of Augusta Raurica. This original fortification was laid out and established outside of what is the modern-day city. The growth of the city shifted towards the bend in the Rhine over time due to the destruction of the original settlement after the fall of the Roman Empire. The city has developed in multiple phases that are all observable within the modern day’s built environment. One of the major periods of development that is noticeable within the city is the medieval city. Located right around the bend in the Rhine and the first of the five bridges to cross. The medieval bridge no longer exists; within its place is middle bridge which is a stone replica erected between 1903 - 05. However, other portions of the medieval city still exist and are well preserved. The red sandstone city hall is part of the original medieval city and is one of the most notable buildings in the oldtown portion of Basel. Shortly after the development of the medieval city, Basel started to develop new civic and public amenities. In 1460 the university of Basel is founded and becomes the first university in Switzerland. Basel is also home to Kunstmuseum the first public art gallery in the world which was established in 1661. Basel is now home to over 40 different museums within the city proper. There are lots of theaters within the city as well including the major theater that will be a dominant figure in one of the potential sites. The city developed in a humanist historic arts-based manner on the south side of the Rhine where a more industrialized development was placed on the north side of the Rhine.

Pre-1400s 1400s 1500s 1800s

Basel - 1500s

1900s

Growth of Basel Over Time

Basel - 1400s

Basel - 1800s


Basel - 1900s


Basel’s morphology is influenced heavily by the hilly topography of the city, as well as the bends and knees of the Rhine that passes through the city, dividing it into North and South portions. The main roads of the city follow this organic shape of the Rhine, and in between the main roads are vaguely gridded organizations. The grids aren’t strictly orthogonal because they follow the topography of the city. These grids are most prominent in the more historical parts of the city, such as Grossbasel and Kleinbasel, and start to dissipate the more north or south of the city center. This is because the city becomes less densely populated and less commercial and touristcentered in these areas. The more northern districts are industrial, servicing the ports along the Rhine, such as the most important port in the region: the Gateway. To the south of the city, the districts become much more residential and almost suburban, with much more greenspace and lawn space for residents of the city. These are the newer districts of the city, also, and with more modern times Basel has become interested in preserving green space in the city.

Major Roadways

Figure-Ground with Openspaces and Greenspaces


Districts of Basel

Matthaus, Klybeck, Kleinhuningen

St. Johann

Basel Nord and Riehen

Iselin, Gotthelf, Bachletten

Kleinbasel and Wettstein

Gundeldingen, Bruderholz, and Dreispitz

Grossbasel city center and St. Alban


St. Johann

The district of St. Johann has had an evolution that embodies the current national spirit of Switzerland. Located on the northwest of Basel, the district of St. Johann used to be primarily working-class housing designed for compact and affordable living. Unsurprisingly, this led to it becoming a melting pot of cultures as people from all walks of life found residence there with their fellow workers. This combination of cultures, a feature that has been established to be part of Basel’s identity, allowed St. Johann to prosper as a district and help it evolve into its current form today. Now St. Johann sits as the growth center of Basel both culturally and architecturally. Recently a new promenade was built along the banks of the Rhine inviting new waterfront office and apartment buildings with it. The nightlife of St. Johann continues to thrive with restaurants, pubs, and clubs bringing vibrance into the district and a means of relaxing after the workweek for the many residents who still call it home. But that’s not all, in some ways the district can be seen as an allegory for Switzerland as a whole with the newly constructed Novartis Campus showcasing how important the pharmaceutical industry is to Switzerland’s economy. It is just another example of how the district of St. Johann is thriving and in the perfect condition to continue being one of the cities most growing districts


Iselin, Gotthell, Bachletten

These three districts located on the most western side of Basel encompass a large portion of the residential space within Basel. You will find far less construction and traffic congestion in this part of town as well as fewer tram lines as their main purpose is simply to get passengers to and from center city. Given that Basel is still a densely populated urban European city the vernacular within the Iselin-Gottheil-Bachletten district is that of apartment buildings and row homes. This is the ideal living location for small families and young professionals and it is considered the most sought-after residential property due to its proximity to center city without actually having to be in the center of the city. Plus there is plenty of green space accompanying these residential units adding to the atmosphere of a lovely neighborhood. One notable tourist attraction is the Basel Zoo located within the Bachletten section of the district. This is often how most tourists find themselves in this part of Basel but many find that it is a nice change of pace from what can be found more towards the center of Basel.


Gundeldingen, Dreispitz

Bruderholtz,

and

Basel’s southernmost district comprises the sections Gundeldigen, Bruderholz, and Dreispatz and has recently taken up the mantle as Basel’s cultural arts district. Like the rets of the city, this district has many different cultures that can be seen within the streets and the people. However, this district is different due mainly to the distinct architectures that can be seen as a result of these cultures. The Gundeldigne section seems to fit in with the other outskirts sections of the city with mostly residential units as well as the Basel train station and transportation centers. Next to that is the section of Dreispatz which follows along the rail lines heading south towards Zurich and also has an industrial feel to its surroundings. Located here is the Academy of Art and Design as well as the electronics arts institute House of Electronic Arts. This has turned Dreispatz into the place to be when it comes to creating Basel’s future look and voice within the artistic world. It can be surprising then to see directly west of these sections the area of Bruderholz. Bruderholz is one of the higher end areas of the city to be in and boasts some of the area’s most magnificent villas as well as large open greenspaces with monuments and sculptures for the public to enjoy. The rest of Basel is dense with rowhomes and apartments comprising the majority of the available residential space but Brudeholz almost feels American having mostly single family houses at a considerable size and with ample yard space. This is not uncommon within Switzerland where large suburban sprawl is not experienced. Since this is the southernmost edge of Basel there are a few smaller towns located along the rail line and highway before opening back up to the Swiss countryside making Brudeholz not only stunning location-wise but still very convenient distance-wise within the city.


Matthaus, Klybeck, Kleinhuningen

Known as the port of Basel, which actually is the largest port in Switzerland. It receives international ships. There is also a music scene emerging from the area - there is a multitude of electronic dance clubs along the Rhine in this district - an example of the city using the riverfront to its full potential. Kleinhuningen is a strong industrial area, where Matthaus and Klybeck are similar but are also changing in terms of bringing more types of activities than just port activities.


Basel Nord and Riehen

Riehen was awarded the Swiss municipality with the highest quality of life, due to its large amount of green space and an attractive city center. Riehen is a strong cultural center within the city, since it is home to the Fondation Beyeler, which houses around 250 classic modernist pieces, designed by Renzo Piano There is a large focus on nature, with animal parks and plenty of hiking trails. Residents love that the city combines both culture and nature together The district has also made strides from converting old industrial areas, such as freight yards, to residential areas full of greenspace


Kleinbasel and Wettstein

Kleinbasel is the other historical district in Basel. It is slightly newer than Old Town, as it was established as soon as bridge technology allowed access over the Rhine. It is symbolized by Middle Bridge, which connects Old Town and Grossbasel to Kleinbasel. Kleinbasel was considered the “lesser Basel” for quite some time, but is now a very popular district. Kleinbasel has an ambient waterfront along the Rhine, and tourists enjoy seeing the historical buildings. Kleinbasel is the district that contains Klybeckstrasse, which is a bustling street with plenty of shops and restaurants. It’s important to note that the main roads in Kleinbasel follow the topography of the river and its bends.


Grossbasel city center and St. Alban Grossbasel contains most of the sights most associated with Basel, it includes the Old Town as well as the world-class museums and shopping centers. Grossbasel also contains both the City Hall and the Marktplatz, which is an eye-catching red tower whose imposing tower was built after Basel joined the Swiss Confederacy in 1501. Every day of the week, the Marktplatz takes over the piazza of the city hall (Rathaus), which sells fruits, vegetables, and international products to locals of the city, and is a common stop for tourists. St. Alban-Tal, located in St. Alban, is known as “little Venice” in Basel, which has a strong Italian culture. The streets of Old Town are characterized by medieval-looking buildings that are built wallto-wall, with very narrow streets, that follow the undulations of the topography of the city.



Climate

Basel’s Koppen climate classification is CFB which stands for an oceanic climate zone; however, there is a continental influence due to the inland nature of Basel’s location. This area is home to a warm temperate climate that experiences year-round precipitation and has a yearly average temperature of 50.8oF.

Basel

Swiss Koppen Climate Map

Global Koppen Climate Map



Psychrometric Chart

The base psychrometric chart displays the fact that without any type of architectural intervention a very small amount of the year is what is considered comfortable. Only six percent of the year which equates to 538 hours falls within the standard comfort range. What can be determined from the base chart is that the vast majority of hours fall in a lower range of temperature and a higher range of humidity than the comfort zone. This leads to the requirements of heating and dehumidification for most of the year. The suggested best strategies by climate consultant support the claim that heating and dehumidification is necessary for most of the year.


Humidity

Basel is a relatively humid area with a yearly average of roughly 75%. The warmer months are typically less humid with an average of 71% and the colder months are typically more humid with an average percentage of 80%. The humidity is also pretty indicative of the fact that Basel receives year-round precipitation getting at the lowest 3 inches of precipitation in a month and at the highest will get 5 inches in a month. Total yearly precipitation is around 50 inches and this is including snowfall and rain.

Temperature

The average temperature fluctuates vastly throughout the year as Switzerland is a central European country and they experience the effects of all seasons. The temperature will drop within and below freezing during the coldest months and will reach temps upwards of 75°F. This range of temperature is what causes so much of Basel’s yearly climate to be uncomfortable. As nine months out of the year, the average temperature is less than 60°F. This results in a yearly average of 46.5°F which is below the desired thermal comfort temperature of 68°F - 74°F. Temperature related to Humidity displays that in the warmer months when the temperature rises the humidity will drop significantly whereas in the colder months the humidity will increase.


Wind Rose

Yearly wind patterns display that the most likely direction for wind comes from the south westernly direction. Wind temp is usually cold and the majority of extreme wind speeds come from the south west. In the winter the wind is relatively more humid and has a relatively calm average speed of roughly 7-10 MPH. In the spring the wind is more spread out throughout the cardinal directions and yet maintains the same calm average of 7-10 MPH. Summer is a pretty consistent split between northern and southern winds with winds from the north being warmer than winds from the south. The wind speed in the summer is gentler in the north and a little bit faster from the south yet still the average does not exceed more than 12-15 MPH. In the fall the split between directions is still present but more hours are starting to shift to the south. The temperature of the wind in the fall is starting to decrease from the temp of the summer and still maintains the gentle average.


Basel’s Classification on Beaufort Scale In

terms of the Beaufort scale the average wind speed within Basel is typically considered a 2 to 3. Which is classified as a light to gentle breeze. Serious concerns about high wind speeds will not be overly important as Basel rarely deals with high speed to gale force winds. While wind speed is not always the most important factor, the wind considerations within Basel should focus more on wind temp than wind speed as wind temp will contribute more to the comfort or discomfort of a space.

Wind, Yearly Avg., Basel 12

1

11

2

10

3

9

4 8

5 7

6

Beaufort Scale Classification


Vernacular Response to Climate

The city of Basel reflects its climate through its vernacular, especially seen in Old Town. Old Town is characterized by sturdy stuccoed buildings that have limited openings that can be used in a multitude of weather conditions. The openings that dot each elevation are regularly arranged so that wind can pass easily through the buildings to support natural ventilation strategies. The roof-forms protect these windows from precipitation during warmer months that see frequent rainfall. The steep-sloped roofs direct water away from the openings during warmer months, and allow snowfall to melt off of the roofs in the winter time, therefore reducing snow load on the buildings. Basel encounters a winter characterized by snowfall and cold temperatures. Compact buildings characterize Old Town’s urban landscape that touch wall to wall, and create enclosed streets. This provides protection against the harsh winter climate to pedestrians. The heavy precipitation that comes with being located in an oceanic climate means that there is a major fluctuation in river height along the Rhine. Architecture along the riverfront takes into account this flooding, as buildings are mostly set back from the riverfront, or raised up on heavy concrete walls so the building will not be flooded. Areas along the riverfront are instead used for outdoor garden spaces or gathering spaces, so that there is low-risk if these spaces get flooded. As the city aims for high-performance buildings, modern buildings aim to fully utilize daylight through the use of heavy-glazing. This allows daylight to reduce the building’s energy usage by providing natural lighting as well as heat gain through the glazing. This contrasts the city’s historic vernacular which didn’t have high-performance glazing available, and had to rely on heavy walls to retain heat within the buildings.



SITE ANALYSIS



Central Basel

Located within the oldtown portion of Basel our site sits within close proximity to the main theater of Basel and next to two fairly old and important churches within Basel. The site is mostly flat however for being inside of the city there is a change in elevation of about 15 feet. This site is in an extremely dense part of the city, as it is in the city center and this is the main hub of the city for cultural centers. This location, next to the oldest theater company in the city, Theater Basel, allows for a cultural center to be built that allows the city to hold gatherings, exhibitions, and be a welcome center, intended to be a cultural destination within its own right. The density of the built environment surrounding the site means that there are no “scenic” views, at least from the landscape perspective. However, the site is located in a bustling city center and can take this opportunity to relate to the architecture surrounding the site. The building can also be its own architectural destination.

Site Location


SITE

THEATER BASEL


The site is located in a more contemporary sector of Grossbasel, but it still has connections to its roots in more historical building vernacular. While the current Theater Basel building is of postmodernist construction, built in the 1970’s, the first building is in a more Neoclassical style. This represents the kind of architecture that was popular during the company’s origin. The building has since burnt down, but as the theater is on it’s fourth (and current) building, it shows that the company is invested in keeping up with current architectural trends. The surrounding buildings are also similar to the current Theater Basel in postmodernist construction, but there are glimpses of the past architectural styles along the streets surrounding the site. The city during the 1950s was still mostly consisting of regional vernacular architecture, but as buildings had to be rebuilt it appears that the city has drifted away from preserving this style of architecture, except in districts that have a strong historical connection, such as Old Town and Kleinbasel.

Site Location



One of the main challenges in designing for this site is going to be the steep topographic changes throughout the site. There are many different sets of stairs that surround the site, which connect the site both to the sidewalk and the Theater Basel building adjacent to the site. This abundance of stairs means that there will be efforts needed to make the site accessible to those who cannot climb the stairs. The topography of the site may also influence movement around the site, and inform circulation patterns. The site also sees a lot of rain, which means that drainage will need to be considered so that stormwater runoff will not be an issue. There are also many taller buildings that surround the site, which block off views to the rest of the city and the Rhine River, a few blocks north of the site. This means that visual experiences will have to be designed, instead of curated through the use of openings and views to the surroundings.

Topography of Site Gradient

Height of Surrounding Buildings Gradient


Access to and from the site is very easy as being situated within the city means that walking, biking, driving, and mass transit are all available and usable for means of access. As a city that prides itself on sustainability, public transportation means are given the priority. The city has a strong public tram line and the design on the site will most likely have to accommodate areas where tram riders can get dropped off. The city also has a strong connection to pedestrian and bicycle travel. This means that there will have to be design features that both accommodate bicycle storage, as well as possible areas where workers of the building have areas to freshen up. Of course, service areas will still have to be available for shipments, so the street structure that surrounds the area will have to be considered. Pedestrian Pathway

Street Direction Orientation

Path Tunnel

Pedestrian Access

Vehicular Flow

Public Transportation Tram Lines Bus Stop

Municipal Tram Map


The site sits in a dense urban area, but the sun patterns in both the winter and the summer do not cast strong shadows throughout the hours of operation that this center would see. The summer would see more active daylight hours, and therefore could benefit from solar energy, as well as louvers that would protect the glazing from allowing too much heat transfer. In the winter, the daylight hours are much shorter, and the site could use excess energy that is stored from the summer months from the solar array to power during the winter. The winter season is also very cold in this climate, and using passive solar heating strategies would be a big benefit to the design of this building. It will have to be considered that there are not a large amount of shadows that are cast on the site, so shading devices will have to be implemented on almost every elevation in order to properly block out the sun and maintain internal temperatures in the building.

Summer Solstice - 9 AM

Summer Solstice - 5 PM

Winter Solstice - 9 AM

Winter Solstice - 5 PM


Monthly Average Precipitation

Due to the oceanic climate that Basel is in, it sees a lot of rainfall. The site lacks green space and softscapes that would absorb this rain, therefore, runoff from the vast amount of rain throughout the year needs to become a factor within consideration for this site. The city also has a law that requires new construction to have a green roof, so vegetation and drainage can be considered in this way, if the building was to take up a majority of the surface area of the site. Greenspace on the surface area of the site would also be a pleasant addition to a block of the city that does not have much civic green space available. Temperatures throughout most of the year are below 60 degrees, which makes glazing necessary for internal building temperature regulation. However, passive ventilation strategies can still be used in the summer months, as temperatures remain quite temperate during those months. The glazing should be operable for these reasons. Outside heating sources will also most likely have to be used, because of the low temperatures and glazing can only do so much, unless there are the financial resources to build a highperformance wall with a high-thermal value. If an outside heat source must be used, it should be electric in order to offset the building’s carbon footprint.


Augusta Raurica

Located far outside the modern city, Augusta Raurica is an excavation site that seeks to unearth Basel’s earliest history. Augusta Raurica was one of the most important port cities for the Prince-Bishopric which it was a part of, due to its location near the Rhine River. In fact, it was the seat of the overall PrinceBishopric. In modern times, the ruins are in a more rural part of the region, far away from the dense city of downtown Basel. The site is surrounded by open fields, farmland, and residential areas. There are also ruins to the north, most notably the amphitheater, which was one of the earlier and most fully unearthed excavations. The site itself is relatively flat, and is surrounded by mostly woods, which means that there are generally obstructed views from the site. However, at certain vantage points, one can see the taller buildings of the skyline of Basel. The site is quite serene in its own right, due to the large expanses of green open space, which allows for many opportunities when developing the site.

Site Location


RHEINTHERMEN KASTELLMAUER

KAISERAUGST

ROMISCHE ZEIGELEI

AUGST AMPITHEATER

SITE


Augusta Raurica was one of the most important cities in the Prince-Bishopric, as it was the seat of the overall Empire. It was an expansive city, which lay between two smaller tributaries of the Rhine. It was a gridded city, with Roman-style architecture. The buildings were characterized by red-tiled roofs and an open-air interior courtyard, which is the same typology used in Classical Roman architecture in Italy. The Prince-Bishopric is where Basel got its namesake from, which is derived from Latin Basilia. Later on, Augusta Raurica was established as the administrative center under Roman Gaul. As the Holy Roman empire developed, the city was incorporated into Germana Superior, which was a province of the Holy Roman Empire, which covers most of current day Germany and a section of France. The city was burned in 917 and the ruins were left. Excavation of the ruins began in 1955, and continues on to this day. Currently, there is still 80% of the ruins left to be excavated.



In contrast to the site in downtown Basel, the site at Augusta Raurica is in a low-density area that is mostly surrounded by open green space. There is not much of a built environment that surrounds the site. To the north, there is one of the main excavations of Augusta Raurica, the amphitheater. Surrounding the amphitheater are several other excavated ruins, as well as a museum that displays some of the excavated artifacts from the ancient city. To the southeast of the site, there is a large residential area that is still decently removed from the site itself. The site has plenty of “breathing room” and does not have to worry about distractions from the neighborhood or the complex of ruins to the north. Access to the site is more limited than the site in downtown Basel. The site is located next to a major highway and is surrounded by minor roads that have a preference to personal vehicles. There is no public transportation directly to the site, and so car traffic is most likely going to be the transportation that is taken to the site. There are no major pedestrian pathways, pedestrians may walk along the road but it most likely won’t be the preferred route because it isn’t as safe as taking a car. Bicycles might be taken, if it is available for those who come from the ruins to the north down to the site.

Figure Ground Diagram of Surrounding Context Roadways Primary Secondary

Vehicular Access Diagram


Circulation around Site and Context

Residential and Ruins

Incidentally, there is a major roadway that acts as an axial connector from the amphitheater to the site. This creates a direct relationship between the ruins to the site. It is unknown if there are any ruins below the surface of the site, but it would be a powerful message to have the laboratory that services the ruins be directly connected to the ruins through a visual tool such as an axis. There is a smaller section of ruins to the northwest of the site, connected to the axial road by a perpendicular road. This isn’t as visually strong as the axiality between the site and the amphitheater, and acts more as a bounding limit to the site, combined with the treeline that separates this more minor road with the site. The residential area is very much intertwined with the ruins. This sector of the city has two distinct purposes, but both share the land as greenspace that is adjacent to either the ruins or the residential area. The two areas remain distinct from one another, as there is no stray house in the middle of the ruins. However, when designing the site, it will be important to mitigate the noise from the surrounding neighborhood and its roads. It will also be important to distract visitors from the residential area, so there are no disturbances to the residents. Since the site is surrounded by both types of areas, there will have to be a balance struck between the two different needs of strategies for both surrounding areas.


In the summertime, there is very direct, bright sunlight that hits the site during its hours of operation. The site’s longest edge is oriented towards the south, so the building should take advantage of the sunlight in the summer months with a solar array that can house and store power until the winter time, when days are shorter and sunlight during winter hours alone isn’t enough to keep the building running. There are no major shadows that hit the site, which means that sufficient sun shading will be needed during the winter, and means of shading would be nice to have for visitors exploring the vast greenscapes that the site has to offer. This could be in forms of tree cover, built shading devices such as small pavilions, etc. The winter does not see any significant shadows either on the site, but daylight hours are significantly decreased in these months. Daylight sun can also be used in the winter through the use of glazing, and this will create heat transfer into the interior of the building, maintaining the interior temperatures without the excessive need for a heating element. Of course, Swiss winters are very harsh and some form of heating element will most likely have to be used, such as an electric heating unit or radiant flooring.

Summer Solstice - 9 AM

Summer Solstice - 5 PM

Winter Solstice - 9 AM

Winter Solstice - 5 PM


Monthly Average Precipitation

Due to the oceanic climate that Basel is in, it sees a lot of rainfall. The site is mostly greenspace, which rainfall could be absorbed by the fields with little worry about the runoff due to the topographical nature of the site. The city also has a law that requires new construction to have a green roof, so vegetation and drainage can be considered in this way. There could also be the consideration to harvest rainwater to either bring a water feature to the site, in order to connect it with the Rhine River that was crucial in the formation of the ruins on the site, or to be used in the greywater systems of the site as a sustainability feature. Temperatures throughout most of the year are below 60 degrees, which makes glazing necessary for internal building temperature regulation. However, passive ventilation strategies can still be used in the summer months, as temperatures remain quite temperate during those months. The glazing should be operable for these reasons. Outside heating sources will also most likely have to be used, because of the low temperatures and glazing can only do so much, unless there are the financial resources to build a highperformance wall with a high-thermal value. If an outside heat source must be used, it should be electric in order to offset the building’s carbon footprint.


2 PRELIMINARY SITE AND BUILDING STRATEGIES


During this phase of design, initial possibilities are explored. The first step is developing several site strategies in order to incorporate the site into the design from the beginning stages. These strategies will be revised later down the road, but provide a basis for thinking about building massing and relationship to its context. The next step is an exploration of space through the study of several plans by other architects. The plans’ geometries, hierarchy, spatial structure, formal composition, and movement are studied. This is then reflected in an esquisse of the program for the chosen site, Augusta Raurica. Following the study of these “master” plans, further development of basic massing of the building is considered by choosing one “master” plan to further explore. These early explorations and studies will influence the rest of the design process.


SITE STRATEGIES CONCEPT 1 The site within the Augusta Raurica ruins is relatively flat, and set back from most of the residential area that is to the north. This opens up many opportunities for intervention. There is an existing road that runs north to south, and splits the site almost in half. This road is a strong existing axis, and provides the direction for a major path to the proposed building location on the site. The proposed building is located towards the southern end of the site; however, flanking the south of the site is a major highway, which causes a major noise concern. Vegetation is used at the south of the site to solve this. The form of the building replicates the form of the amphitheater that is north of the site, which is connected to the site through the road that splits the site in half. This direct connection created by the road informs the relation of the amphitheater, and the half-circle shaped building. The site is to be built up with earth to the south of the building, which both mitigates noise and creates the illusion that this building, too, was once a ruin that was excavated. The intention for the built up site is to continue onto part of the roof of the building, to create an occupiable green roof. Where the building does not occupy the site, there is opportunity for the rest of the site to be used as an outdoor display of ruins excavated from Augusta Raurica. The east of the site is set aside for this purpose. There are four main groups of land that can be used to display excavated ruins, where paths are laid out between the groups that mimic the neighboring residential street structure, to further tie the site to the community. Parking is kept to a northern “arm” of the site because it is sat within a wooded area and adjacent to a major roadway intersection, allowing for easy vehicular access to the site. The parking lot’s distance to the building is substantial, but this removes the vehicle from intruding upon the motif of ancient ruins.



SITE STRATEGIES CONCEPT 2 The second site strategy is to create a vast “park” where ruins can be exhibited in the exterior landscape throughout the site, and have the building intervention mimic the forms of the ruins that are found throughout the site. Augusta Raurica, as an ancient Roman settlement, used the ancient Roman Villa typology as a basis for most of the buildings found in the settlement. The new construction mimics these forms, with continuous use of the courtyard, but the courtyards on the front of the building are open to the public, which create small plazas for the public to gather outside of the building. These open plazas are determined by a series of regulating lines that run throughout the site, which follow the same undulation as the knee of the Rhine that passes through Basel, which further connects Augusta Raurica back to the city. Where the building intersects the regulating line, the building is cut off and an open courtyard is created. Interior courtyards can also be found within the building, which are more authentic to the historical building typology. This is weather permitting, though, and would most likely only be used during the warmer months. The rest of the site is an open greenspace that exhibits excavated ruins. The paths in the surrounding greenspace follow the forms of the regulating lines created by the Rhine, which distinguish certain parts of the ruins and guide visitors between exhibits. The ruin exhibitions to the west of the site are more formalized, as they are the first part of the site experienced by visitors entering from the north end. However, the ruins to the east of the site are more informal, as it is more of a park that has ruins in it rather than a formalized exhibit. Visitors can choose to venture to this part of the site, and have a more rural, natural experience rather than the curated exhibit of the other part of the site.



OCCUPANCY LOADS

According to the program, which was previously specified for the project, the total size of the building will be around 35,000 square feet. When broken down, the room sizes dictate the occupancy loads for each room. From the calculations, a total of 580 occupants are expected to be in the building at a specific time at maximum. This was determined by the fact that about half of the building will be used for Assembly purposes, as specified by the International Building Code, and the other half of the building will mainly be used for business purposes, where the labs and storage modules are concerned. According to the International Building Code, there will need to be about 173 square inches of egress out of the building. To calculate bathroom requirements, the population of the occupants was divided in half, so that there would be approximately 290 male occupants, and 290 female occupants. Then, as specified by the International Building Code, there will need to be five water closets for men, where two of them can be interchanged for urinals, and six toilets for women. There will also have to be three water fountains included in the building.

Program Element

area net

area gross

category (assembly..)

subcategory (A3, A4, B1,..)

coeff. Factor (feet)

net/gross

# of occp.

coeff. of egress. (in) in of egress

trav. Dist. (feet) common pa

Info cente/reception

500

800 Assembly

A3

5 net

100.0

0.3

30

250

Multi-purpose room

3000

4800 Assembly

A3

15 net

200.0

0.3

60

250

Artifacts gallery

2000

3200 Assembly

A3

30 net

66.7

0.3

20

250

cloakroom

300

480 Assembly

A3

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

250

Cafeteria/kitchennette

500

800 Assembly

A2

200 gross

4.0

0.3

1.2

250

IT control room

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

Common office/lounge

600

960 Assembly

A-3

15 net

40.0

0.3

12

250

Director's office

150

240 Business

B

100 net

1.5

0.3

0.45

300

meeting rooms

400

640 Business

B

15 net

26.7

0.3

8

300

3000

4800 Business

B

50 net

60.0

0.3

18

300

Laboratory

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

8000

12800 Business

B

300 gross

42.7

0.3

12.8

300

IT room

400

640 Business

B

300 gross

2.1

0.3

0.64

300

Waste room/recycling

200

320 Factory

F-1

300 gross

1.1

0.3

0.32

250

Equipment room

600

960 Business

B

300 gross

3.2

0.3

0.96

300

Locker room/changing area

600

960 Business

B

50 gross

19.2

0.3

5.76

300

Laundry room

250

400 Factory

F-1

50 gross

8.0

0.3

2.4

250

Vault Storage module

Totals:

21100

33760

579.9

173.97


ath of travel (ft)

male

female

Toilet (m)

total toilets (m) Toilet (fem)

total toilets (fem) urinals

total urinals

water fountain

total water fountains

75

50

50 1 per 125

0.4 1 per 65

0.8 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.268 1 per 500

0.2

75

100

100 1 per 125

0.8 1 per 65

1.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.536 1 per 500

0.4

75

33.33333333

33.33333333 1 per 125

0.2666666667 1 per 65

0.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1786666667 1 per 500

0.1333333333

75

0.8

0.8 1 per 125

0.0064 1 per 65

0.01 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.004288 1 per 500

0.0032

75

2

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

2 1 per 40

75

20

20 1 per 125

100

0.75

0.75 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

100

13.33333333

100

30

0.05 1 per 40

0.05 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.0335 1 per 500

0.008

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

0.3076923077 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1072 1 per 500

0.08

0.03 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.015 1 per 100

0.015

13.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.2666666667 1 per 100

0.2666666667

30 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.6 1 per 100

0.6

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.16 1 per 65

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

100

21.33333333

21.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.4266666667 1 per 100

0.4266666667

1.066666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

100

1.066666667

100

0.5333333333

100

1.6

1.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

100

9.6

9.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

100

4 289.95

0.5333333333 1 per 100

4 1 per 100 289.95

0.04266666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.04266666667 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02133333333 1 per 100

0.02133333333

0.005333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.002666666667 1 per 400

0.002666666667

0.064 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.032 1 per 100

0.032

0.384 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.192 1 per 100

0.192

0.04 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02 1 per 400

0.02

0.005333333333 1 per 100

0.04 1 per 100 5

6

2.7

2.4


Formal Composition The formal composition of this plan is a courtyard plan. The courtyard is a central, prominent feature of the plan and the rest of the building is organized around the courtyard. Use of geometry The overall form of the plan is dictated by a strong rectangular form, and the rooms do not cross this boundary. The rooms of the program, as well as the courtyard, all follow a rectangular form. Sometimes, these rooms are proportional to one another, and sometimes they break away from the proportions of other areas of the program. The gallery surrounding the courtyard is geometrically symmetrical across from itself, but the east/west gallery geometry is different from the north/south geometry. The openings are also aligned on a gridded system that does not always correspond to the appropriate opening space for that specific room, rather, they follow the overall geometry of the form. Spatial structure The spatial structure of the plan is clearly a courtyard plan, with the rest of the program acting as a “solid” on the surrounding exterior of the courtyard. Movement The movement of the plan is clearly defined by the gallery space surrounding the courtyard, as well as the main entrances on the north/ south axis. These main spaces dictate the formal movement around the plan. There are dedicated rooms for vertical movement, which is the second-most important form of movement. The movement from room to room in an enfilade manner is the tertiary movement throughout the design. Hierarchical structure: The hierarchical structure of the design is clearly dictated by the courtyard, as it is the aspect that organizes the rest of the plan, and is therefore the most important space. The main entrances at the south and north of the plan are the second-most important spaces. Then the enclosed programmatic elements are the third-most important spaces, as they joined together in a more compact manner to highlight the importance of the courtyard.

GEOMETRY

HEIRARCHY

SPATIAL DIAGRAM


MOVEMENT DIAGRAM

GALLERY

STAFF ROOMS

RECEPTION

MULTIPURPOSE STOR. MODULE

OFFICES

OFFICES

LABS

VAULT

SERVICE

STOR. MODULE

MY PLAN


Formal Composition This is a courtyard plan, consisting of three interior courtyards throughout the building. Use of geometry The geometry of the building is dictated by a module that determines the proportions of the programmatic elements of the plan. This module is located on the westernmost “block” of programmatic elements. The circulation is also the same in width throughout the plan. Some of the rooms are aligned on a singular regulating line that runs horizontally across the plan, but not all of the rooms are dictated by this geometry. Spatial structure The spatial structure of the plan is a courtyard plan that is enclosed by a semi-compact organization of rooms. The rooms themselves are organized into blocks that are accessed through designated corridors that break up the blocks on all four sides. The courtyards in the plan help break up the interior quality of the programmatic elements and help bring daylight into these interior spaces. Movement Movement throughout the plan is designated to the exterior of the program. There are designated corridors for formal movement around the blocks of the program. Within the designated rooms, movement from room to room is possible without having to enter back into the corridor. Courtyards also help facilitate movement. Hierarchical structure The hierarchy of the structure moves from the more important spaces on the east side of the program, with the less important, more private spaces on the west side of the program. The clear entrance on the east side of the program means that this space is more important and public. Then, the spaces become more hidden and less accessible the further west of the plan. The section also gives clear hierarchy to the space on the east, as it has a clear priority of an interesting ceiling form for that specific space.

GEOMETRY

HEIRARCHY

SPATIAL DIAGRAM


MOVEMENT DIAGRAM RECEPTION

MULTIPURPOSE

OFFICES

LABS

MEETING ROOMS SERVICE

VAULT

GALLERY

LABS

STORAGE MODULE

STORAGE MODULE

MY PLAN


Formal Composition This is a courtyard plan, even though the “courtyard” is not a courtyard at all: instead it is a group of four rooms that are used for ambulatory purposes. Use of geometry The geometry of the plan is a clear square on the interior that is split symmetrically into four smaller squares. The exterior geometry is also a square, but it is distorted and stretched to the point that at first glance, it is not clearly a square. The four openings on each side of the plan are also symmetrical to its opposite: the north/south openings are symmetrical to each other, and the east/west openings are symmetrical to each other. Spatial structure The spatial structure is a clear separation of solid and void. The void of the plan are the four interior rooms that almost appear courtyardlike, but are open-plan rooms that can be accessed from one another. The surrounding rooms act as the “solid” of the plan, because all of the rooms are compactly placed next to one another, and can only be accessed by the interior square “void” rooms. Movement The movement of the plan is clearly determined by the interior square rooms. Each of these rooms have a clear entrance from the exterior, and have an open plan so that the minor program elements can be accessed from these larger rooms. The square rooms can also be accessed from the other square rooms, which creates a circular movement pattern on the interior of the plan. Hierarchical structure The interior four square rooms are the most important spaces of the plan. These spaces are the biggest in terms of area, and are also the areas of the plan where most movement happens. There is also an open-plan structure to these rooms, which creates a hierarchy where the exterior rooms are there as supporting spaces.

GEOMETRY

HEIRARCHY

SPATIAL DIAGRAM


MOVEMENT DIAGRAM

LABS

RECEPTION SERVICES OFFICES

STORAGE MODULE

LABS

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

STORAGE MODULE

MEETING ROOMS

MY PLAN


Formal Composition This is a compact plan. The rooms are connected to each other through an enfilade system, where there is no defined circulation space. Use of geometry The geometry of the space is clearly defined as a linear rectangle that is broken up by smaller vertical rectangles that break the edge of the linear rectangle. The more open rooms create small rectangles within the larger rectangle that are sometimes proportional to other small rectangles in different parts of the plan. Individual rooms are also proportional to one another, and sometimes follow the same exact dimensions and are repeated throughout the plan. The smaller programmatic spaces that are aligned vertically also are proportional in width to create a repetition of these tertiary spaces throughout the plan. Spatial structure The spatial structure of the plan can be seen as a solid-and-void. The larger rooms are grouped together to create open “blocks” of program and are broken up by smaller blocks of program aligned vertically to create the boundaries of the blocks. The boundaries are seen as the solids of the plan, and the more open rooms are seen as the voids in the plan. Movement Movement throughout the structure happens in an enfilade pattern, but there is a clearly defined path on the north and south ends of the structure. The movement is then broken up between the north and south directions by the tertiary program spaces that allow more vertical movement, instead of more horizontal movement on the north and south sides of the plan. Hierarchical structure The program spaces that push past the edges of the linear rectangle are clearly the most important spaces because they break up the regularity of the horizontal rectangle that defines the boundary for most of the plan. The second-most important spaces are the blocks of program that create the spatial “voids” in the plan. The tertiary spaces are the vertical smaller program elements that break up the “voids” in plan.

GEOMETRY

HEIRARCHY

SPATIAL DIAGRAM


MOVEMENT DIAGRAM

RECEPTION

OFFICES

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

MEETING RMS IT ROOM VAULT

SERVICES

GALLERY

LABS

LABS

STORAGE MODULE

STORAGE MODULE

MY PLAN


Formal Composition The formal composition of this plan is that it is a compact plan. The rooms themselves do not allow for specific circulation around them, only from room to room for specific rooms for circulation only, such as rooms for stairs or anterooms. Use of geometry The geometry of the space consists of a series of six circles that grow larger proportionally, that are adjacently placed throughout the structure. The edges of the circles on the perimeter of the plan are cut off by a larger square, so that the plan itself is a square with interior circles throughout. Spatial structure The spatial structure of this plan is that the plan is cellular in nature. All of the rooms are the same exact shape, and are adjacent to one another, the way that cells bounce off of each other. The open spaces created by the edges of the circle are small courtyards that help bring light into the interior of the building. These courtyards created by the geometry help break up the plan and reinforce its cellular nature. Movement The movement in the plan is dictated by an enfilade movement pattern, except where there are specific anterooms that provide movement between different programmatic elements that do not make sense to have movement between them in an enfilade manner. The vertical circulation is contained in separate rooms instead of being incorporated into larger programmatic rooms. Hierarchical structure The hierarchical structure of this plan is dictated by the function of the room, rather than the size of the room. The more important spaces are on the interior of the plan, and the service spaces, albeit larger, are less important and are therefore placed on the exterior of the plan. These spaces also help fill the geometry of the plan that is clearly dictated by a square shape.

GEOMETRY

HEIRARCHY

SPATIAL STRUCTURE


MOVEMENT

RECEPTION

MEETING ROOM

MEETING ROOM

LABS

IT

GALLERY

OFFICE OFFICE

VAULT

SERVICES

LABS

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

STORAGE MODULE

STORAGE MODULE

MY PLAN


Formal Composition This is very clearly a fragmented plan. The different programmatic elements are clearly separated from one another and are only connected through a strong corridor. Use of geometry Geometry is very present in this plan. The different programmatic elements are grouped together and follow the form of platonic shapes. The shapes are then split in half, so that the program all fits in either half-circle or half-square shapes. The shapes are organized so that the edges of the program and the top edge of circulation all align in a square form. The bounding area of the shape is a proportional rectangle within the square that bounds the top edge of the circulation and the bottom edges of the shapes. Spatial structure This plan is extremely fragmented. Without the circulation, it appears that the shapes and their placements have no rhyme or reason to where they are in plan. Even the circulation appears fragmented without a closer exploration of the geometry. Movement Movement throughout the plan is clearly defined through two sets of long, rectangular corridors. The corridors are the only way that other parts of the program, that are not adjacent within the block of the platonic shape, can be connected to one another. Vertical circulation is hidden in the strong, linear, corridor system. Hierarchical structure The platonic shapes containing the program are the most important spaces in this plan. The linear circulation is the second-most important aspect of this plan, as it creates the bounding geometry for the overall plan. The tertiary space is the small irregularly-shaped circulation between the platonic shapes that doesn’t seem to fit in with the rest of the geometry of the plan.

GEOMETRY

SPATIAL STRUCTURE

HEIRARCHY

SPATIAL STRUCTURE


MOVEMENT

MOVEMENT

RECEPTION

STORAGE MODULE

GALLERY

OFFICES MEETING ROOMS

LABS

VAULT

SERVICES

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

STORAGE MODULE

LABS

IT ROOM

MY PLAN


SUMMARY

Throughout the studies of these plans, and the readaptation to fit the program for the site in Augusta Raurica, there is a clear gravitational pull towards the concept of the courtyard. This is partly due to the context of the site, where Roman villas were present and along with this typology, plenty of courtyards. This incorporation of the courtyard to the new construction is a callback to the site’s history. The courtyard also helps organize the geometry of the plan and gives opportunities for environmental stewardship, passive strategies, and opportunities for showcasing ruins and laboratories in a dynamic way. Between all six compositional studies, the cellular plan, inspired by the plan by Tomihiro, was chosen. This plan allows for multiple explorations of the incorporation of the courtyard, as well as provides means for the building to be a noticeable object on the site. Future explorations that will be considered are placements of the courtyards in a cellularnatured plan, the forms of the cells, and the bounding form of the building itself. Incorporation of the site will also have to be considered, as well as the possibility of having the building in part disregard the site, and be related to its context through the use of historical typologies.

COMPOSITION 01

COMPOSITION 02

COMPOSITION 03

COMPOSITION 04


COMPOSITION 05

COMPOSITION 06

CHOSEN COMPOSITION


STRATEGY 01

Formal Composition The formal composition of this plan is that it is a compact plan that features courtyards, but the plan is not organized around the courtyard structure. Use of geometry The geometry of the plan is organized by the use of the square shape. The plan itself consists of different rooms that are bound to the square shape. These rooms are then placed in a manner where movement in an enfilade manner is achieved, and also placed in a way where all of the exterior room’s edges are bound by an exterior square shape. Spatial structure The nature of the spatial structure of this plan is that it is cellular. The rooms all follow a distinct form, similar to the forms that a cell takes in nature, where it is all the same form repeated throughout the area. The cellular nature means that the cells are all adjacent to one another, but openings between the spaces that are not dictated by program use can be used as minor courtyards. Movement Movement throughout the plan is through an enfilade pattern. Rooms of similar programs are grouped together so that movement can happen from room to room without the proper designation of a corridor. Where it is not possible to have enfilade movement because there is no way to have a similar program adjacent, anterooms are used to maintain the square cellular structure of the plan. Hierarchical structure Hierarchical structure is found through the size of the cells. The larger the cell is, the more important the space is. The more important spaces are intermixed with the less important spaces in order to maintain program adjacencies.

EQUIPMENT ROOM

ANTEROOM

VAULT

COURTYARD

ANTEROOM

COURTYARD

SECTION CLOAK KITCHENETTE RECEPTION ROOM

TRASH LAUNDRY LOCKER ROOM

ARTIFACTS GALLERY ANTEROOM

EQUIPMENT ANTEROOM ROOM

STORAGE MODULE

COMMON OFFICE

IT ROOM

D.O. MEETING

VAULT

MEETING

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

LABS

STORAGE MODULE LABS

PLAN



STRATEGY 02

LAB

STORAGE MODULE

STORAGE MODULE

COMMON ROOM

PRIV. COURT.

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

D.O.

IT

ANTEROOM

MEETING ROOM

LAUNDRY

PUBLIC COURTYARD

CLOAKROOM

IT

ARTIFACTS GALLERY

WASTE

Formal Composition The formal composition of the plan is a compact plan. Courtyards are dispersed throughout the rooms, reinforcing the nature of the compact plan, rather than a courtyard plan. Use of geometry Geometry of the plan is mostly found in the bounding region of the plan, as well as the consistency of geometry in the design of the courtyards. The plan is bounded by a square, and the square is further incorporated in the plan through the square courtyards that are consistently found in major program rooms. All rooms in the design are rectangular shaped, which reinforces the cellular nature of the plan. Spatial structure The spatial structure of this plan is cell-based. The rooms are all bounded by a rectangular form and organized so that they are all adjacent to one another, therefore eliminating the need for corridors. There are specific anterooms when necessary to help reinforce the cellular nature of the plan and not need corridors. Movement Movement throughout the plan is mostly through an enfilade manner. The horizontal movement either happens from program room to program room, or in specific anterooms where movement between specific programmatic rooms does not make sense. Vertical movement, such as stairs, will have its own separate room to reinforce the cellular nature of the plan. Hierarchical structure The hierarchy of the structure is based on the size of the room. The larger rooms in plan are the more important spaces. The height of the room is also an indicator of hierarchy: the taller rooms are the more important spaces.

ANTE- EQUIPMENT MEETING ROOM ROOM ROOM EQUIPMENT ROOM ANTEROOM

RECEPTION ARTIFACTS GALLERY

LAB

STORAGE MODULE

STORAGE MODULE

ANTEROOM CAFE

LAB

PLAN



PLACE, CONTEXT, SCALE

The design of the massing relates to its context through the use of courtyards, and its form, especially through the roof shape. The use of courtyards and roof shape is heavily influenced by what laid on the site previously: the Ancient Roman typology. The Ancient Romans heavily used villas with courtyards and hip roofs in their settlements. The elements of the courtyard can be seen through the roof shape, as the roof shape is altered slightly from a hip roof shape. This is to relate the building to its more contemporary time period, as well as to establish a connection between the viewer from the exterior of the building to the courtyard typology on the interior of the building. When working on a site that is so specific to its historical past, which relates to the building’s program, it is important to relate the contemporary building to the elements that used to be on the site. Since the site is so expansive, and the building is only 35,000 square feet, it could be easy for the building to be lost in its natural surroundings. Scale is an important factor here. The building aims to be an “object” on the site, to make itself known. It almost serves as a beacon for the surrounding research community working on excavating Augusta Raurica.



SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, IDENTITY

The design of the building is to relate to its context, but also stand apart from its surroundings and site. The building is to be almost a monument to represent the excavation work being done at Augusta Raurica. It is to relate to its surroundings through form and spatial quality, but be a noticeable object on the site. Since the site is so large, it is important for the building to be solid and recognizable as separate from its surrounding residential community. Ideally, the building would look heavy in its context, as it has always been on the site, referencing the site’s long history, but be recognizable as its own object of contemporary architecture. To contrast the heavy construction qualities of the site, the strong use of courtyards incorporates daylight, and an overall lightness that contrasts the building’s heavy exterior. This plays nicely with the building’s purpose as a research lab and museum for an excavation site, where the darkness of unearthed ruins meet the light brought upon by excavation. Ultimately the building should be representative of the site’s identity as an excavation site. It should tie the past historical context to the contemporary so that it will kindle an interest in the site by the public, be a learning opportunity, and be a proud space for the surrounding community.



ORGANIZATION, ARTICULATION The space is organized through the use of cells as rooms, that are all bounded by a larger shape, in this case, a square. The articulation of the rooms cannot be seen from the exterior, as the bounding edges create a monumentality to the wall, which almost appears like there is one big room behind the wall, instead of many smaller spaces. The articulation of the different spaces can be more clearly defined in the interior of the space, as the courtyards break up the different rooms and programmatic areas. The rooms are grouped together through basic program use, so that movement in an enfilade manner is possible. There is no clear distinction between major programmatic areas, such as public versus private space. The distinction of major programmatic areas would make it much more difficult to produce a cellular plan, where movement in an enfilade manner is necessary. The cellular plan lends itself well to the building program in terms of allowing incorporation of courtyards, as well as blurring the lines between public and private space. The cellular nature of the plan ensures that there are “gaps” between rooms, since they are limited in organization by the exterior bounding shape. These gaps allow for exploration of heavy introduction of courtyards. The cellular nature also allows for an organization of program where the public can walk by the more private spaces, such as the lab spaces, to learn about the archaeological process.



TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, DETAIL/ HAPTICITY

Materiality is important to the design of the building in that it is a means to relate the building to the site. The materials should speak to the past, but be updated in a contemporary manner in order to have a fresh, inviting, dynamic look to the building. The Ancient Roman typology included a lot of concrete, brick, and stucco for the walls, with the iconic red slate roof. The materiality for the building could be more updated through the use of different colors, smoothness of material, or different detail patterns of the material, such as the formwork of the concrete or pattern of brick. The red slate roof could be emulated in a multitude of ways, an example using a red metal roof in a different shade of red than the traditional red slate.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP

Environmental stewardship is incorporated through the design of the building. The use of courtyards and heavy-walled construction are the main sustainable strategies used in the design. The courtyards help promote daylighting as a passive strategy, so that every room has access to daylight, as well as promotes air circulation as a passive strategy for ventilation. During the summer, the air that comes through the courtyard gets cooled down and can be brought into the interior of the building, therefore reducing the need for a mechanical cooling system. The heavy-wall construction increases thermal mass, which promotes a steady heat-transfer of solar radiation through the walls throughout the day and into the night. In the summer, this helps keep the building cool during the day and warm at night. This strategy also works well in the winter, when heat can constantly be released in the building through the use of solar radiation. Other strategies further to be explored are solar collection, rainwater collection, as well as greenery and vegetation strategies.



3 DEVELOPMENT OF PRELIMINARY DESIGN


The design development of the project was rigorous in exploration and decision making. Outlining the design principles that would dictate the project was a continuous process, but ultimately led to the decision that the Ancient Roman building typology, especially Ancient Roman Villas, should be explored throughout all of the levels of the design process. This principle would lead to explorations of form, construction, envelope, and passive strategies. Throughout the process, developing the form has been the most challenging. The form is reminiscent of the Roman Villa, but exact replications were never desired. Instead, discovering a dynamic form that is inspired by the ancient form has been explored, and is still currently being explored as structure, enclosure, and plan develop further. Overall, the design development process throughout all aspects of the building has been very insightful and has allowed decisions about structure, form, etc., to coincide with decisions about systems, therefore creating a more cohesive project.


STUDY 1

COMMON ROOM

PRIV. COURT.

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

D.O.

IT

ANTEROOM

MEETING ROOM

LAUNDRY

PUBLIC COURTYARD

CLOAKROOM

IT

CHOSEN STRATEGY

WASTE

The selected strategy incorporates courtyards throughout the cellular plan of the building. This is so that each room of the building has access to daylight and the outdoors, instead of risking dark, cave-like spaces that are windowless rooms. The intention of this massing study is to reflect the cellular plan in the massing of the building. This is done by each cell having a distinct pyramidal roof to separate that room from the overall mass of the building. Each roof is in a pyramidal shape so that light can come into the courtyard, without risking too much drainage issues with stormwater runoff, so that the water falls away from the courtyard, instead of pouring into it. The roof forms also recall the Roman Villa type-form that was previously on the site in the form of a modified hip roof. This calls back to the site’s context without being a direct rebuilding of the Roman Villa. The massing of the building is solid on the site, so that the building stands clear in the vast open fields of the site. The building acts as a beacon in order to be a central meeting point for visitors of the Augusta Raurica ruins. The materiality of the building, which is yet to be fully explored, can aid in the appearance of the building as an “object” on the site. This can be put in a metaphorical context: the building has been on the site as an object that has been able to last through the origins of the ancient city, and has survived being a buried object. The type-form of the building and its roofs help reinforce this idea.

ANTE- EQUIPMENT MEETING ROOM ROOM ROOM EQUIPMENT ROOM ANTEROOM

RECEPTION ARTIFACTS GALLERY

LAB

STORAGE MODULE

STORAGE MODULE

ANTEROOM CAFE

LAB

PLAN



STUDY 2

COMMON ROOM

PRIV. COURT.

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

D.O.

IT

ANTEROOM

MEETING ROOM

LAUNDRY

PUBLIC COURTYARD

CLOAKROOM

IT

CHOSEN STRATEGY

WASTE

The selected strategy incorporates courtyards throughout the cellular plan of the building. This is so that each room of the building has access to daylight and the outdoors, instead of risking dark, cave-like spaces that are windowless rooms. The massing of this building groups together the different levels of program according to usage. The public spaces are grouped together, the semi-public spaces are grouped together, and the private spaces are grouped together. These spaces are distinguished from one another from base wall height, and the direction of the slope of the roof. This gives the building a more cohesive form, while still providing dynamism through the movement of the roofs. The roofs are perforated where the interior courtyards are, so that fresh air can circulate through the building and provide passive cooling strategies. The perforations of the roofs also allow storm water to drain in towards the courtyards, which can help water any plant-life planted within the courtyards. The sloped roofs help create a dynamic and monumental figure on the site. It stands apart from the type-form of the Roman Villa, and instead focuses on relation to site context through the use of interior courtyards. Materiality has yet to be explored, but perhaps a move in a lighter-appearing building might be beneficial in contrasting the site’s context and helping further the dynamic appearance of the roofs.

ANTE- EQUIPMENT MEETING ROOM ROOM ROOM EQUIPMENT ROOM ANTEROOM

RECEPTION ARTIFACTS GALLERY

LAB

STORAGE MODULE

STORAGE MODULE

ANTEROOM CAFE

LAB

PLAN



FINAL VERSION Originally, the final version that was chosen was the Study 02. This study was chosen to be refined because it seemed to be more cohesive and brought more dynamism to the building mass. The refined massing includes recessed open-air terraces that serve to bring a lightness to the massing, as well as serve as raised viewing platforms to the rest of the site to view the exterior excavated ruins. While the dynamism of Study 02 is appealing, it goes against the principles that have been developed for the overall project thus far. The main site concepts have been to have a quiet monumentality that reflects the past architectural language, specifically through courtyards. The intensity of the sloped roofs is too distinct from the previous site typology, and strays away from the concept of subdued, quiet monumentality. The first study is more connected to the original concepts of the site. The first study both represents the cellular aspect of the plan, and massing of the building does represent the previous typology on the site. Only after constructing the physical model of Study 02, was the extent of the intensity of the roof slopes fully realized. Moving forward, the massing from Study 01 will be used and refined as the plans move forward in the design process.

ORIGINAL CHOSEN STUDY

REFINED MASSING

PHYSICAL MODEL 1:50’-0” SCALE

PHYSICAL MODEL 1:50’-0” SCALE


FINAL CHOSEN STUDY

FINAL CHOSEN STUDY

FINAL CHOSEN STUDY


SUMMARY The updated plan of the building creates a cellular effect for each room. The rooms are defined solely by their programmatic purpose, and circulation between the rooms happens through the implementation of anterooms. The anterooms create an informal garden space between the formalized rooms and the anterooms, which could be used for circulation or for simple outdoor enjoyment without having to enter a formalized courtyard within one of the programmatic rooms. This creates a multi-level experience of the courtyards fully integrated throughout the building. In section, there is a mezzanine in the gallery space. This allows visitors to go up to the mezzanine, and look through a glass window down into the laboratory spaces. This gives visitors more insight to the archaeological process, and prevents laboratory workers from feeling like they are in a “fishbowl.” The section, and consequently the elevations, is formally dictated by a hip-style roof where all ridgelines lead up to the wall-height of the formalized courtyard spaces. The different placements of the courtyards throughout the rooms dictates the angle of the roof line and creates a dynamic roof line that further emphasizes the cellular plan. The hip-style roof was inspired by the roof forms of Ancient Roman villas.

FLOOR 01 PLAN

SECTION AA

FLOOR 02 PLAN

SECTION BB


FACADE STUDY 02 - LIGHTWEIGHT CONSTRUCTION

FACADE STUDY 01 - MASSIVE CONSTRUCTION

FACADE STUDY 02 - LIGHTWEIGHT CONSTRUCTION


CONCEPT 1: MASSIVE CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPLES Place, contect, and scale The massive construction system expresses the project’s connection to the past through the use of a construction system that is often associated with an older style of building. It reinforces the idea that the building for this project has, “always been there.” Massive construction is relevant to the site because Ancient Roman buildings used massive construction, and this style of construction references the past built environment of the site. Space, character, atmosphere, and identity The use of stone as a material through massive construction methods makes an immediate connection to the visitor of the archaeological process. It creates an identity for the building of being a location where archaeology takes places, and reinforces the idea of “the past.” The natural material also creates a serene atmosphere for the user as it connects to the natural surroundings of the site, as the site is in an open, semi-wooded setting. Organiztion and articulation The material for the wall facade is the same for the entirety of the building, and the roof material is the same for the entirety of the building. The use of one material for the walls and one material for the roof is done so that the monumentality of the building is reinforced. The roof is not stone because of load-bearing concerns, but the concrete roof ties into the stone construction of the walls.


EAST ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION


NORTH ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION


11

3

1 1 2 22 2 3

3 4 5

6 ELEVATION

37

8

8

1 3

2

4

5 PLAN

0

1

2

3

4

5

10

1. CONCRETE FINISH WALL 2. CLAY BLOCK 3. RIGID INSULATION 4. MORTAR 5. APPLIED STONE 6. CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB 7. SAND 8.GRAVEL 9. CMU BLOCK 10. CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING 11. FINISH CONCRETE ROOF CLADDING

9 99 9 3 3

1. CONCRETE FINISH WALL 2. CLAY BLOCK 3. RIGID INSULATION 4. MORTAR 5. APPLIED STONE 6. CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB 7. SAND 8.GRAVEL 9. CMU BLOCK 10. CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING 11. FINISH CONCRETE ROOF CLADDING

WALL SECTION

10

COMPOSITE DRAWING


Tectonics, materiality, and detail/hapticity Decisions about materiality are made through the context of the site and the program of the building. How does the materiality relate to the siting and programmatic use of the building? The stone materiality connects the building back to the site and creates a monumental attitude. The heaviness of the building gives the illusion that this building has withstood time and has been there since the development of Augusta Raurica. The stone, as a facade, is figurative, but the massive construction is honest in that the clay blocks also relate to the brick construction methods that were present on the site’s past architecture. In terms of joints, the appearance of them should be limited. This reinforces the permanent aesthetic of the building’s materiality. Environmental stewardship The material contributes to the zero-carbon initiative of the project through the use of recycled facade materials. The rubble can be recycled stone either from excavation of the project, or even from the archaeological digging that surrounds the site. The clayblock construction creates a high-thermalmass system that contributes towards passive heating and cooling strategies. The type of construction lends itself towards the zerocarbon initiative, but when choosing materiality for the building, it was more so an aesthetic decision rather than a zero-carbon initiative. However, with this type of construction, zerocarbon strategies can easily be incorporated.

FINISH DIAGRAM

INSULATION DIAGRAM

WATER DIAGRAM

MOISTURE DIAGRAM


1. CONCRETE FINISH WALL 2. CLAY BLOCK 3. RIGID INSULATION 4. MORTAR 5. APPLIED STONE

1 2

3

4

5

3D ASSEMBLY


CONCEPT 2: LIGHTWEIGHT CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPLES Place, contect, and scale The construction system suggests a modern take on a project whose program is so deeply rooted in a historical context. The lightweight construction method, along with a facade that is primarily glass, showcases modern construction methods which contrasts the site’s historical nature. It bridges the gap between the past, which is the archaeological program of the building, and the present, where the ruins of Augusta Raurica are being learned about in the current day. Space, character,atmosphere, and identity The material quality of the translucent glass, which is terracotta tinted, reinforces the building’s connection with the built environment that was once on Augusta Raurica’s site. This relates the buildings to the Ancient Roman buildings that often used terracotta tiled roofs. The connection is subtle, but creates a full circle of understanding the site’s past and present. The translucent glass creates a glowing atmosphere on the site, when the site is dark and the warm light from inside of the building glows through the facade. While this would most likely happen outside of business hours, it would create a dynamic experience of the building between the night and day, where in the day the building becomes a subtle object on the site. Organiztion and articulation All of the areas of the building would be handled in the same way, with the translucent glass being the only facade used. The use of one facade works in this design because the dynamic roof shapes break up the possible monotony of using a single facade material. The use of one facade material unifies the building, which contrasts the plan’s cellular nature.


EAST ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION


NORTH ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION


9 10 3

11

1

2

3

4

4 6 5

12

3 13

14

7 8

1. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH WALL 2. STRUCTURAL CASTIN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL 3. RIGID INSULATION 4. TRANSLUSCENT RIGID INSULATION 5. MAINTENANCE CATWALK 6. ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL FIN 7. TRANSLUSCENT GLASS 8. ALUMINUM LOUVER 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH CEILING 10. HEAVY TIMBER ROOF STRUCTURE 11. CORRUGATED ROOF FINISH 12. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB 13. SAND 14. GRAVEL 15. CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL

15 3

14

1

2

3

4

4

5 6 7

8

1. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH WALL 2. STRUCTURAL CASTIN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL 3. RIGID INSULATION 4. TRANSLUSCENT RIGID INSULATION 5. MAINTENANCE CATWALK 6. ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL FIN 7. TRANSLUSCENT GLASS 8. ALUMINUM LOUVER

COMPOSITE DRAWING


Tectonics, materiality, and detail/hapticity The decision to use translucent glass as a material comes from the idea to contrast the natural elements of archaeology and a more natural, wooded setting of the site with the use of artificial, man-made materials. This instills curiosity of the building in the visitor. The lightness of the material contrasts the size of the building, which with a heavier materiality, could possibly be too imposing on the site. The construction of the facade is honest, where the translucent glass prevents any “illusion” with structure and materiality from happening. In terms of joinery, the appearance of joints should be minimized. This is to prevent distraction from the single use of materiality, to create one composed object on the site. Environmental stewardship The materiality doesn’t immediately lend itself to the zero-carbon agenda of the project. The artificial nature of the facade isn’t zerocarbon, but the translucency of the glass lends itself towards passive strategies in terms of daylighting, which fits the zero-carbon agenda of the project. When choosing this material, the zero-carbon initiative wasn’t at the forefront of decision-making. However, possibilities of using recycled material can arise, and utilizing the facade’s aid in passive strategies should be maximized moving forward.

FINISH DIAGRAM

INSULATION DIAGRAM

WATER DIAGRAM

MOISTURE DIAGRAM


1. TRANSLUSCENT GYPSUM 2. TRANSLUSCENT RIGID INSULATION 3. TRANSLUSCENT GLASS 4. TRANSLUSCENT GLASS RIBS

1 1 2 3 4

3D ASSEMBLY


CONCEPT 1: LOAD-BEARING

PLACE, CONTEXT, AND SCALE The structural system of concrete load-bearing walls expresses the building’s historical context. Ancient Roman building typology shows that concrete was used as a primary structural material. By incorporating concrete as a structural material to the new facility, a subtle connection to the site’s past vernacular is established. SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, AND IDENTITY The structure contributes to the experience of the space by having a heavy, exposed structural material contrasting the artificial exterior. The interior provides a more grounding experience of the space that contrasts the lightness of the exterior that is found on the outside. The structure would be expressed, however a backing wall would be needed. ORGANIZATION AND ARTICULATION All of the areas of the building are handled the same way, except for the formal courtyards, which are curtain walls in order to maximize daylighting. The continuous structure throughout the space creates a solid feeling interior, which expresses the cellular nature of the plan. The solid walls help create strong partitions. TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, AND DETAIL/ HAPTICITY Decisions about the structural system were made by referencing the historical nature of the site. The structure reinforces the connection to Ancient Roman typology. The structural system is connected to decisions about the envelope by the structure contrasting the artificialness of the envelope, with being a material that is made with organic material. It is important to reveal the manner of construction because it creates an atmosphere that is essential to the experience of visiting an archaeological facility. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP The structure relates to the zero-carbon agenda because concrete has a relatively low carbon footprint. However, it is important to note that concrete has a high level of embodied carbon. To recognize this is to design the building in a way that allows for expansion, instead of tearing down the building when it becomes too small for the use.


SECOND FLOOR PLAN WITH LOADBEARING WALLS

SECTION WITH LOADBEARING WALLS

FIRST FLOOR PLAN WITH LOADBEARING WALLS


CONCEPT 2: POST AND BEAM

PLACE, CONTEXT, AND SCALE The structural system expresses a nature of the project that contrasts the monumentality of the continuous skin of the building. The lightness of a post-and-beam structure creates a lighter feel on the earth of the site, rather than being a heavy object on the site. However, this is only perceived on the interior. SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, AND IDENTITY The structure creates an atmosphere within the building that feels much lighter on the interior rather than feeling surrounded by heavy loadbearing walls. The structure discontinues the cellular nature of the partition walls of the plan, and acts as a separate cellular structure through the gridded system. The structure would be exposed in order to show the modern construction material of glulam post-andbeam. ORGANIZATION AND ARTICULATION All of the areas of the building are handled the same way. The post-and-beam structure grid is separate from the organization of the partition walls: the structural grid is autonomous from the plan. TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, AND DETAIL/ HAPTICITY Decisions about structural systems are made due to the immediate design parti of a cellular plan. The grid of a glulam post-and-beam system reinforces a cellular plan in an overlay of the plan of the partition walls. The structural system is completely separate from the envelope system. It is important to reveal the manner of construction because it represents modern construction methods in order to maintain an environmental responsibility, which contrasts the historical undertones of the plan. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP Environmental stewardship is recognized in this structural system through using a sustainable building method made of organic materials such as glulam. Wood is a prominent natural resource in Switzerland and can be sourced locally. While environmental concerns are a forefront of the project, the aesthetic quality of the post-and-beam system should also be fully considered.


SECOND FLOOR PLAN WITH POST & BEAM

SECTION WITH POST & BEAM

FIRST FLOOR PLAN WITH POST & BEAM


FINAL CONCEPT

PLACE, CONTEXT, AND SCALE The structural system of a combination of both load-bearing walls and post-and-beam expresses the duality of the historical context of the building, as well as expressing relation to the context through using post-and-beam structure as well. The structure references both the historical Ancient Roman building methods, as well as the abundant natural wood resources of the Swiss context. SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, AND IDENTITY The structure helps reinforce the connection to all levels of context throughout the site. The structure is a reinforcement of the form of the building and its being influenced by the context of the site. The exposed structure is essential to this representation of connection to the context. ORGANIZATION AND ARTICULATION There is a clear set of “rules” that dictate the layout of the structure. The load-bearing walls are limited to the actual rooms of program. The post-and-beam structure is to support the curtain walls of the courtyard, as well as where the roofs fall towards the courtyards. This way, the structure is related to the envelope so that the envelope can be supported by the loadbearing walls. TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, AND DETAIL/ HAPTICITY Decisions about structure are made due to the building’s relationship to the context. Structure, as it is exposed, should reinforce that idea, as well as contrast the artificial materiality of the envelope. This will create a haptic experience for the visitor, which is discovering a heavy structural system underneath a lightweight facade material. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP While environmental stewardship is an important aspect of the project, stewardship is taken in a less-conventional role because loadbearing concrete does have a lot of embodied carbon. However, the building is designed to last through the possibility of expansion, as well as the concrete will utilize aggregate from local excavation. The glulam post-and-beam structure provides a modern environmental perspective to the building.


SECOND FLOOR PLAN WITH POST & BEAM AND LOADBEARING WALLS

SECTION WITH POST & BEAM AND LOADBEARING WALLS

FIRST FLOOR PLAN WITH POST & BEAM AND LOADBEARING WALLS


WINTER

In winter, passive strategies to improve comfort include internal heat gain, passive solar heat gain, and wind protection of outdoor spaces. Temperatures remain relatively low-to-mild, so maintaining warmth within the building is crucial. This can be done by using internal heat gain through high-thermal mass walls, which keep the heat on the interior of the building and prevent thermal loss through the building’s walls. Solar heat gain can be utilized by lots of glazing, where the sun can enter in through the glass and provide warmth to the interior spaces. There should be minimal shading devices utilized. During the winter, wind speeds increase, and therefore outdoor spaces should be protected against the wind. This can be done with roof coverings, form, and walls that block the direction of prevailing winds.

WINTER PSYCHROMETRIC CHART


WINTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART

WINTER TEMPERATURE CHART

RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART - DAILY

TEMPERATURE CHART - DAILY


WINTER WIND ROSE

WINTER SOLAR RADIATION CHART

BEAUFORT SCALE CLASSIFICATION

SOLAR RADIATION CHART - DAILY

WIND SPEED CHART - DAILY


The design of the defined programmatic space with a courtyard provides all of the passive strategies necessary for providing comfort in the winter seasons. The internal heat gain is felt through the heavy concrete load bearing walls, which have a high thermal mass. The thermal mass retains heat gained during the day and maintains comfortable temperatures on the interior. The heat also slowly dissipates through the walls, instead of high thermal loss during the winter months. The glazing of the courtyards provides solar heat gain, as sun rays enter onto the courtyard and provide warm temperatures as the rays pass through the glazing. This maintains a warm interior temperature. The form of the space causes wind to be blocked from outdoor spaces by the roof, as wind gets blocked by exterior walls and blown over the roof form. The form of the courtyard prevents wind from going in a downwards direction into the courtyards. While the courtyards are very unlikely to be used in the winter, in case one has to go outside, they would be protected from the wind.

SO

LA

R

H

EA T

G

AI

N

REFLECTED SOLAR HEAT

INTERNAL HEAT GAIN

WIND PROTECTION OF OUTDOOR SPACES

WINTER COMFORT STRATEGIES


SPRING

With spring comes warmer temperatures and more solar radiation. The amount of solar radiation may be too much, and cause overheating of the space. During spring months, it is important to provide solar shading of the windows of the building. However, temperatures can still be slightly cool, so internal heat gain within the space is still necessary. Which is fine, because the thermal mass of the building remains constant in most cases. Passive solar heat gain remains important, however, not as important as in the winter months. Wind protection is also still important, as some outdoor spaces may be used in the spring now that temperatures are warmer and there is more sunshine. However, winds remain persistent and so wind protection of outdoor spaces remains necessary to maintain the comfort of these spaces. Finally, as warmer weather approaches, and precipitation increases, humidity increases. Therefore, measures should be taken to dehumidify the space.

SPRING PSYCHROMETRIC CHART


SPRING RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART

SPRING TEMPERATURE CHART

RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART - DAILY

TEMPERATURE CHART - DAILY


SPRING WIND ROSE

SPRING SOLAR RADIATION CHART

BEAUFORT SCALE CLASSIFICATION

SOLAR RADIATION CHART - DAILY

WIND SPEED CHART - DAILY


Strategies to improve comfortability in the spring in the Augusta Raurica facility include similar strategies included in the winter passive strategies. Thermal mass of loadbearing concrete walls, found throughout the whole facility, maintains internal temperature to a comfortable range. Solar heat gain is taken in through the windows of the room itself and the courtyard space. The different locations of glass help incorporate solar heat gain throughout multiple times in the day. In order to provide solar shading, louvers are installed on the face in order to prevent too much solar heat gain during peak daytime hours, especially in areas that have a lot of glazing. However, due to the repetitive facade, louvers would be installed on every elevation of the building. The spacing would be determined by the seasons and angle of the sun in Basel, in order to maximize heat gains in the winter, and lessen them in the spring. Dehumidification still remains to be explored through passive strategies.

SO

LA

R

H

EA T

G

AI

N

BLOCKED SOLAR HEAT FROM LOUVERS REFLECTED SOLAR HEAT

INTERNAL HEAT GAIN

WIND PROTECTION OF OUTDOOR SPACES

SPRING COMFORT STRATEGIES


SUMMER

In summer, overall comfortability of the interior space is higher without any passive strategies implemented. Temperatures remain relatively temperate, without going too high to the point where the heat is uncomfortable. However, passive strategies should still be implemented in order to improve comfortability. Sun shading of the windows remains an important strategy, as more solar radiation enters the building during the daylight hours. Too much solar radiation through the glass increases temperatures to an uncomfortable level, so shading should be used to maintain a comfortable temperature. Internal heat gain is still used, but instead, the heat is stored in the walls during the day, and then the thermal mass allows the heat to transfer from the walls to the interior during the night, which maintains a pleasant interior temperature. Wind protection of exterior spaces isn’t necessary, and in fact, ventilation would improve with the breeze passing through the space. Lastly, passive dehumidification strategies should be utilized.

SUMMER PSYCHROMETRIC CHART


SUMMER RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART

SUMMER TEMPERATURE CHART

RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART - DAILY

TEMPERATURE CHART - DAILY


SUMMER WIND ROSE

SUMMER SOLAR RADIATION CHART

BEAUFORT SCALE CLASSIFICATION

SOLAR RADIATION CHART - DAILY

WIND SPEED CHART - DAILY


Summer strategies utilized in the Augusta Raurica facility are louvers and interior ventilation through the courtyards. Since there is a significant amount of glazing, louvers should be utilized to prevent too much solar radiation from entering the interior of the building and increasing temperatures to an uncomfortable level. Ventilation strategies are also used so that the wind can pass freely throughout the building, which cools down the temperatures if it is too warm in the interior. Lastly, thermal mass is used in order to store heat in the walls during the day, which slowly moves through the thick walls during the day so the heat is released into the interior during the night. This keeps temperatures cool during the day, and warm at night. Passive dehumidification strategies are still to be explored. SO

LA

R

H

EA T

G

AI

N

BLOCKED SOLAR HEAT FROM LOUVERS REFLECTED SOLAR HEAT

INTERNAL HEAT GAIN

SUMMER COMFORT STRATEGIES


FALL

Fall is noted most by cooling temperatures and less humidity. Solar shading of the windows becomes less necessary, and sunlight capture through the glazing becomes more desirable. Daylight is used as a passive lighting strategy when possible, and is more appreciated, when daylight hours become shorter in the fall. The sun also provides passive solar heat gain through the glazing. Internal heat gain is still used in order to trap heat in the walls that is slowly released during the night and day. This maintains comfortable interior temperatures as exterior temperatures start to drop. Lastly, as temperatures drop, wind protection of exterior spaces should be used.

FALL PSYCHROMETRIC CHART


FALL RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART

FALL TEMPERATURE CHART

RELATIVE HUMIDITY CHART - DAILY

TEMPERATURE CHART - DAILY


FALL WIND ROSE

FALL SOLAR RADIATION CHART

BEAUFORT SCALE CLASSIFICATION

SOLAR RADIATION CHART - DAILY

WIND SPEED CHART - DAILY


Fall strategies transition well into the winter strategies, as they are the same strategies used. Solar radiation through the glazing is encouraged in order to maintain internal temperature. Shading through louvers would block too much light and internal temperatures would be far too cold. The wind is blocked from exterior spaces because of the roof form, so no wind tunnels form in the courtyards. Breezes are blocked by vertical walls and go across the tallest point of the roofs, keeping the interior of the courtyards comfortable as temperatures start to drop. Lastly, internal heat gain is maintained by using high-mass walls.

SO

LA

R

H

EA T

G

AI

N

REFLECTED SOLAR HEAT

INTERNAL HEAT GAIN

FALL COMFORT STRATEGIES


DAYLIGHTING

SUN SHADING - LOUVERS

VENTILATION

LA

RR

AD

IAT

ION

VENTILATION THROUGH COURTYARDS

SO

The courtyard typology that is found throughout the building helps promote the passive strategies previously discussed throughout the entirety of the building. The courtyard typology, which originally was developed by the Ancient Romans, helped regulate the comfortability of their buildings. The same strategy is utilized in the Augusta Raurica facility. First, the courtyard typology helps promote daylighting throughout the entirety of the building. The cellular nature of the plan complicated window placements to interior rooms, so with the introduction of courtyards, daylighting can be incorporated throughout the entirety of the building, through both the formal and informal courtyards. Louvers are placed on the exterior walls of the building, which regulate sunlight during the summer months, so that solar heat gain does not make the interior temperatures too high. The louvers would be angled so that solar gain can be maximized in the winter, and minimized in the summer months. The roof forms prevent too much solar gain in the summer. Ventilation is used throughout the entirety of the courtyard systems. The courtyards would have operable windows so that any minor breezes could enter the building and cool off temperatures in the summer. Major windows would be placed on the exterior of the walls so that ventilation can enter through the exterior of the building and cross-ventilate. Lastly, stormwater management is taken care of through the courtyard system. Vegetation and permeable soil surfaces will be in the interior of the courtyards, which absorbs stormwater runoff. The angle of the roofs direct water into the center of the courtyards, so water doesn’t get stuck in between roof-pitches. Permeable surfaces will also be used around the perimeter of the building so drainage will be taken care of and water does not cause damage to the exterior walls of the building.

SOLAR HEAT GAIN / DAYLIGHTING

REFLECTED SOLAR HEAT

PERMEABLE GROUND SURFACE FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

VENTILATION THROUGH GLAZING

PASSIVE STRATEGIES DIAGRAM


SPACES THAT CAN PROVIDE VENTILATION TO ENCLOSED SPACES

PASSING OF PREVAILING WINDS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS

SOLAR RADIATION SUN SHADING - LOUVERS

VENTILATION DIAGRAM

NATURALLY WIND-PROTECTED OPEN-AIR SPACES THROUGH MASSING STRATEGIES

SOLAR PROTECTION DIAGRAM

PERMEABLE SURFACES

WIND PROTECTION DIAGRAM

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT DIAGRAM


GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

The overall approach to the design of the mechanical system is to have them as concealed as possible. The overall archaic feeling of the interior of the space should be concealed. Therefore, the mechanical systems, being a modern technology, should be hidden, in order to not disrupt that visual connection within the interior space and the context. Other considerations that have been explored have been what are the local strategies used? How does the Swiss climate lend itself to certain mechanical strategies? Are there ways that traditional systems in this region can be improved upon? Further research into what systems are typically used was conducted, and certain systems were selected. However, the zero-carbon initiative remained at the forefront of this exploration, and if certain mechanical systems did not meet the standards to achieve this goal, they were not considered as in-depth as other options. Lastly, the connection to the site context was considered as well when choosing mechanical systems. The Ancient Romans used a hypocaust system, which allowed warm air to be transferred underneath the floor. This translates to a radiant heating flooring system, which would further reinforce the project’s overall exploration into Ancient Roman typologies, even if it is not seen or experienced by the visitor.

DIFFERENT HEATING STRATEGIES IN SWITZERLAND

NEED FOR HEATING AND COOLING IN SWITZERLAND OVER TIME

TYPICAL RADIANT SYSTEM FOR REGION


ZERO CARBON STRATEGIES

The mechanical systems are primarily a support to the passive strategies explored earlier in the assignment. The zero-carbon agenda primarily focuses on passive strategies, which use no energy, to primarily contribute to the overall comfortability of the space. This is found in the project through the use of courtyards to promote overall daylighting, solar heat gain, ventilation, and drainage. The structure also contributes to the passive strategies through creating high thermal mass, which increases the comfortability of the space throughout all seasons. I am primarily concerned about energy consumption, due to the sheer size of the building. The building also needs to be regulated in terms of temperature, humidity, and ventilation, due to the program needs of laboratory and storage spaces, which typically increase energy consumption. The Swiss standards for zero-carbon building initiatives are much higher than those in the U.S., and therefore more consideration to the building’s impact on the climate must be taken. Systems that support the zero-carbon initiative that will be explored are geothermal radiant heating and cooling, ERV systems, VRF systems, and airhandling-units.


DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

The overall approach to the design of the mechanical systems is to have them as concealed as possible. The overall archaic feeling of the interior of the space should be concealed. Therefore, the mechanical systems, being a modern technology, should be hidden, in order to not disrupt that visual connection within the interior space and the context. While the modernity of the project is also expressed through other areas of the building, such as the facade, the modernity of the exterior of the building contrasts the archaic interior. Therefore, the expression of modern building technology would disrupt that contrast between interior and exterior. There are also several strategies being explored that can’t reasonably be exposed, such as radiant heating and cooling. These systems are embedded in the walls and floors and cannot be exposed. Therefore, it would not be consistent to have one system concealed, with the rest of the systems exposed. Plus, passive strategies are to be encouraged more than using the mechanical strategies. Having the mechanical strategies out of sight, has them out of mind. This would opt occupants to utilize the passive strategies first, rather than the active strategies.

VRF WITH CEILING VENTS

CONCEALED DUCT ERV

AHU IN BASEMENT


HIDDEN RADIANT FLOORING UNDER FINISH FLOOR (DIAGRAM NOT BY AUTHOR)


PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS

While different areas of the building programmatically require different systems, the appearance of the systems remains consistent throughout: hidden. The program requirements of the different mechanical systems are broken up initially into three distinct sectors: the public spaces and administration spaces, the laboratory and service spaces, and the storage spaces. The distinction is made primarily by occupancy, as well as the types of activities likely to happen in those spaces. The public spaces most likely would hold standing, walking, and sitting occupants, similar to the office spaces. The laboratory spaces should be more temperature controlled than the public spaces, due to sensitive materials, and there should be stronger ventilation, due to possible exposure to harmful organic matter of excavated materials. The storage spaces should be temperature controlled, but temperatures can be less comfortable to a person due to the low occupancy. Ventilation should be higher than the public spaces, but can be less so than the laboratory spaces, due to the relatively low occupancy.

CONCRETE GALLERY SPACE WITH HIDDEN SYSTEMS

CONCRETE LAB SPACE WITH HIDDEN SYSTEMS

CONCRETE AND WOOD STORAGE SPACE WITH HIDDEN SYSTEMS


HEATING

COOLING

VENTILATION

POTENTIAL SYSTEMS

HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THESE SPACES FOR COMFORTABILITY OF THE OCCUPANT. INTENSITY OF HEATING NEEDED IS DEPENDENT ON THE SEASON. SOME HEATING IS PROVIDED BY PASSIVE SOLAR HEATING, BUT SHOULD BE SUPPLEMENTED

HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THESE SPACES FOR COMFORTABILITY OF THE OCCUPANT. INTENSITY OF HEATING NEEDED IS DEPENDENT ON THE SEASON. SOME HEATING IS PROVIDED BY PASSIVE SOLAR HEATING, BUT SHOULD BE SUPPLEMENTED

HEATING IS NOT A PRIMARY CONCERN FOR ACTIVE SYSTEMS IN THESE SPACES, AS OCCUPANCY WILL BE VERY LOW, IF NOT NONEXISTENT MOST TIMES OF THE DAY. LOW INTENSITY HEATING MAY BE NECESSARY IN THE WINTER TO PREVENT

WITH ACTIVE HEATING SYSTEMS.

WITH ACTIVE HEATING SYSTEMS.

FREEZING.

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THESE SPACES FOR COMFORTABILITY OF THE OCCUPANT. INTENSITY OF COOLING NEEDED IS DEPENDENT ON THE SEASON; BUT POSSIBILITY OF NECESSITY OF COOLING IN THE WINTER DEPENDENT ON THE

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THESE SPACES FOR COMFORTABILITY OF THE OCCUPANT. INTENSITY OF COOLING NEEDED IS DEPENDENT ON THE SEASON AND ACTIVITIES TAKING PLACE IN THE LABORATORY / SERVICE SPACES,

COOLING IS NOT A PRIMARY CONCERN FOR ACTIVE SYSTEMS IN THESE SPACES, AS OCCUPANCY WILL BE VERY LOW, IF NOT NONEXISTENT MOST TIMES OF THE DAY. COOLING, IN TERMS OF DEHUMIDIFICATION, WILL BE NECESSARY TO PRESERVE

OCCUPANCY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED.

PARTICULARLY THE LAUNDRY ROOM.

ARTIFACTS IN STORAGE.

VENTILATION CAN BE PRIMARILY PASSIVE IN THESE SPACES. VENTILATION CAN BE PROVIDED THROUGH EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND WINDOWS FROM COURTYARDS, WHICH ARE PRESENT IN ALL SPACES IN THIS

VENTILATION SHOULD BE A PRIMARILY ACTIVE SYSTEM IN THESE SPACES FOR SAFETY OF OCCUPANTS AND NECESSITY TO HAVE CLEAN AIR IN THESE SPACES. DUST AND BACTERIA PARTICLES COULD BE A

GROUPING OF PROGRAM.

LARGE CONCERN IN THESE SPACES.

VENTILATION NEEDS TO BE A LOWINTENSITY ACTIVE SYSTEM, AS STORAGE SPACES WITH LITTLE-TO-NO OCCUPANCY DO NOT NEED TO BE VENTILATED. VENTILATION IS ONLY NECESSARY TO PRESERVE CLIMATE, AND COULD BE PROVIDED AS A PASSIVE SYSTEM WHEN THE

CLIMATE IS RIGHT VRF UNIT FOR HEATING AND COOLING, ERV VRF UNIT FOR HEATING AND COOLING, ERV GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND FOR VENTILATION. FOR VENTILATION. COOLING FLOORING, RADIANT HEATING COOLING IN CEILING, AHU FOR HUMIDITY CONTROL WITH VAV FOR SPECIFIC OCCUPANCY LOADS, ERV FOR VENTILATION IN SPACES WITH FLUCTUATING OCCUPANCY. OFFICE SPACES USE NATURAL VENTILATION STRATEGIES.


The next step in creating more distinct program spaces was breaking up the three previously established zones into more detailed regions. The public spaces, which have different requirements than the administration spaces, were separated. There will be large fluctuations in occupancy in the public spaces, compared to the administration spaces, so measures to regulate temperature and humidity should be more intense in the public spaces. There should also be measures taken to separate temperature from the gallery space and the multipurpose space, as the two spaces may have different occupancies at the same time. The occupancy of the administration spaces remains more stable. The service spaces are also separated from the laboratory spaces now, as the mechanical requirements for a laundry room or IT room are different from those of an archaeological lab, but are similar enough to each other that they can use the same systems. The storage spaces remain grouped together because their uses and occupancies are similar enough that they do not need separate mechanical considerations.

ZONE 01: 4,883 SQ. FT. ZONE 02: 2,186 SQ. FT. ZONE 03: 3,275 SQ. FT. ZONE 04: 1,712 SQ. FT. ZONE 05: 8,917 SQ. FT.

DISTRIBUTION OF ZONES AND AREAS


DISTRIBUTION OF ZONES - FLOOR 01

DISTRIBUTION OF ZONES - SECTION FACING WEST

DISTRIBUTION OF ZONES - MEZZANINE

DISTRIBUTION OF ZONES - SECTION FACING SOUTH


PROGRAM

SYSTEM

GALLERY & PUBLIC SPACES

RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING

AREA (FT2) COOLING CAPACITY (TONS)

TOTAL SPACE FOR BOILER ROOM (FT2)

COOLING AIR VOLUME (CFM)

4883

20

100

10,000

20

100

GALLERY & PUBLIC SPACES

AHU

4883

GALLERY & PUBLIC SPACES

ERV

4883

ADMINISTRATION

RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING

2186

ADMINISTRATION

ERV

2186

LABORATORIES

VRF

3275

LABORATORIES

ERV

3275

SERVICES

VRF

1712

SERVICES

ERV

1712

STORAGE

VRF

8917

STORAGE

ERV

8917

AREA OF MAIN AIR SUPPLY DUCTS (FT2)

AREA OF SUPPLY BRANCH DUCTS (FT2)

AREA OF FAN ROOMS (FT2) AREA OF FRESH AIR LOUVERS (FT2)

6

10

10,000

6

10

1,500

1

1 5

500

AREA OF EXHAUST LOUVERS (FT2) 20

10

2

2

10

100

6,000

3

900

0.9

1

4

3

20

100

10,000

6

10

20

10

1500

1

1

2

2

20

100

10,000

6

10

20

10

1500

1

1

2

2

40

200

10,000

10

10

13

12

1500

1

1

2

2

SYSTEM CALCULATIONS


SYSTEM DIAGRAM - FLOOR 01


SYSTEM DIAGRAM - FLOOR 02


SYSTEM DIAGRAM - SECTION BB


PRELIMINARY CODE ANALYSIS

During the preliminary code analysis, some changes to the plan of the space had to be made. The spaces had to be altered in order to provide clear exits out of the building. Since the plan does not contain any corridors, and movement is through different anterooms, clear separation of locked spaces had to be considered, and then exits from those spaces had to be decided. While movement through other rooms to get to an exit is required in some spaces, the rooms required to pass through to get to an exit are without doors, so there is no worry of being unable to access an exit. The different regions of the plan, i.e. the laboratory spaces, or the administration spaces, all have a separate means of exiting the building in case of an emergency. The overall mezzanine had to be altered as well. Initially, it was less of a mezzanine, and more of a second floor, by terms of the square footage. However, since the mezzanine is in a completely interior space, there could be no fire stairs to the exterior of the building. This would also disrupt the uniformity of the form and the plan within adhering to a specific geometry. So, to avoid this, the size of the mezzanine had to be altered so that the space would be considered a mezzanine, rather than a second floor requiring different means of egress. This also allows all of the fixtures to remain on the ground floor, in order to not disrupt the unity of the plan through trying to place fixtures in a mezzanine space where they were never accounted for. horum in se, sedo, C. Occi tat. Qua morum notimo es in si poribuntia erum fici incurnum Romnihi caturae licaperis publisum prae pra ditrae facchui praecio, maximpr or

4 occ.

27 occ.

200 occ.

40 occ.

2 occ.

100 occ.

4 occ.

27 occ.

2 occ.

20 2 occ. occ.

43 occ.

2 occ.

67 occ.

60 occ.

60 occ.

43 occ.

2 occ. 8 occ. 3 occ.

FIRST FLOOR OCCUPANCY LOAD

50 occ.

MEZZANINE OCCUPANCY LOAD


112’-0”

82’-0”

70’-0”

126’-0”

41’-0”

94’-0”

51’-0”

56’-0”

38’-6”

26’-0”

133’-0”

230’-0”

60’-0”

119’-0”

77’-0”

88’-0”

120’-0”

114’-0”

100’-0”90’-0”

182’-0”

FIRST FLOOR EGRESS

FIRST FLOOR FIXTURES

30’-0” 76’-0”

MEZZANINE EGRESS

MEZZANINE FIXTURES


CONSOLIDATION-BUILDING NARRATIVE



GENERAL SUMMARY The project’s site is located in Basel, Switzerland. Basel is one of Switzerland’s major metropolitan areas, and serves as the metropolitan hub amongst the borders of Switzerland, France, and Germany. Basel has a rich history shown through its architecture, especially in the Old Town District in the center of the city, but has also developed its own modern culture through being a major center for contemporary architecture through buildings done by many starchitects, such as Herzog and deMueron, Renzo Piano, and Frank Gehry. Basel also has a long archaeological history, as the city was once the major seat of the PrinceBishopric during the Holy Roman Empire. This old settlement is Augusta Raurica, and is located just south-east of the heart of Basel. This is where the site is located. The site is surrounded by a Roman amphitheater to the north, a colosseum to the left, and modern residential development to the east. The site is a relatively flat, wide open field. There is a large amount of opportunity for vast architectural interventions, and strong development of the site as well.


RHEINTHERMEN

KASTELLMAUER

KAISERAUGST

ROMISCHE ZEIGELEI

AUGST AMPITHEATER

SITE


During early explorations of the site, the program of the building was unknown, except for that the building would be an archaeological facility. Early site development involved the recalling of the site’s past vernacular, and incorporating past vernacular elements in a meaningful way on the site. This investigation included ways to incorporate the site within the building itself, as the site has a lot of natural settings that would be a shame if wasted by being covered completely by architectural intervention. This is where the exploration of multiple courtyards began. In the early site exploration, multiple courtyards were used to encourage movement between different wings of the building, as well as to allow visitors to explore that inside-outside connection within the site. The use of courtyards also recalls back to the historical vernacular of the site, as the use of courtyards was essential to the Roman Villa typology. Early site exploration also included outdoor exhibit spaces, where ruins could be displayed outside and be included as part of the approach sequence. The next step of the assignment involved a series of compositional studies, fostered by the study of the geometrical rulings of plans done by other architects. While six plans were studied, a plan by Tomihiro was chosen as the compositional method that would influence the design of the Augusta Raurica archaeological facility. The Tomihiro plan is a cellular plan that separates rooms of the program into distinct cells that limit movement to distinct paths. The spaces between the rooms of the program create informal courtyards. The creation of informal courtyards by the cellular nature of the plan is what determined the adaptation of the cellular plan for this project. Courtyards were to become an essential design principle of this facility, whose organization would be determined by the cellular nature of the plan. Through the massing development of the early exploration of a cellular plan for the facility, a monumental building emerged, with the courtyards being hidden from the visitor from the exterior of the building. The interior courtyards would be a hermetic experience for the visitor, and would help reinforce the Roman Villa Courtyard typology being explored within the project.

INITIAL SITE CONCEPT

TOMIHIRO GEOMETRY STUDY

INITIAL INTERPRETATION OF CELLULAR PLAN


BUILDING STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT


PLACE, CONTEXT, AND SCALE The facility at Augusta Raurica lends itself to being a monumental building through its siting. The site itself is very long, and can easily fit multiple facilities on it. The program of the facility also lends itself towards monumentality, as the incorporation of lab and storage spaces give the building an industrial meaning. Monumentality is also explored in Basel’s downtown architecture, such as the Kunstmusuem, which is a major cultural institution for the city. The facility seeks to be a cultural institution, which requires a monumentality within the building, whether that be through massing, material, etc. Ancient Roman typology also explores monumentality through long, solid exterior walls that open up to courtyards within. This method is explored within the massing of the Augusta Raurica project. The early massing describes this condition, where the massing on the exterior of the building is solid, and form is given to the building through dynamic roof shapes, whose placement is determined by the placement of courtyards in plan. The roof form is influenced by the Roman Villa roof typology, but abstracted in order to bring the facility to a modern time. Throughout the development of the project, the roof forms have evolved, but the necessity of a dynamic roof shape to bring movement to a monumental building has remained constant.

KUNSTMUSEUM, BASEL

ANCIENT ROMAN TYPOLOGY

ANCIENT ROMAN TYPOLOGY


INITIAL MASSING DEVELOPMENT


SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, AND IDENTITY

There is a strong historical underpinning throughout the entire design of the facility. The program of the facility, an archaeological gallery, lab, and storage space, implies deep connection to history already. The historical connection of the site and the program has been manifested in the design through the adaptation of aspects from Roman building typologies, and incorporating them to fit the needs of a modern archaeological facility. While the form of the building itself is determined by the placement of the courtyards within the interior of the building, the most important identifying aspect of the building is the spatial structure of the building. The cellular nature of the plan allows for the incorporation of courtyards throughout the building. The cellular nature allows visitors to explore different spaces within the building as a separate experience, whose separation is enforced by the courtyard space. The visitor is also experiencing courtyard space within rooms of the program as well, which maintains an indoor / outdoor connection throughout the building. The placement of the courtyards determines the roof form, which creates a contemporary form that is recognizable, but abstracted and contemporized. Construction also plays an important role in the identity of the building. Concrete load bearing walls support the major structural requirements of the space, which does recall construction methods used in the Roman Settlement, further reinforcing the historical connection to the site. The courtyard spaces contrast this heavy construction method by being constructed of curtain wall systems with Glulam supports. This incorporates modern construction methods within the building, and recalls Swiss vernacular as a whole while supporting a more environmentally-conscious construction method.

ROMAN WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPOLOGY

ROMAN CONCRETE WALL CONSTRUCTION

ROMAN VILLA ROOF FORM


GLULAM COLUMN LOCATION CONCRETE LOADBEARING WALL LOCATION

STRUCTURAL DIAGRAM


ORGANIZATION AND ARTICULATION The project’s organization is determined by the notion that each programmatic space is a separate cell, a separate entity, composed together to make a cohesive building. Each programmatic space, broken up as a cell within the building, is organized within an exterior geometrical constraint, which reinforces the monumentality of the project. The adjacencies of the program space is determined by public use, semi-public use, and private use, along with circulation considerations. These spatial relationships are expressed through the interior of the building, where the cellular nature is fully expressed. The clear separation of programmatic space creates the informal courtyard condition, where visitors are free to enter these small gardens that are exposed to daylight, fresh air, and explore informal circulation paths. Larger, more formal courtyards are expressed on the interior and exterior of the building. This creates an indoor / outdoor relationship to the site, and allows visitors to see the courtyard from the exterior of the building and be intrigued to enter the building. The formalized courtyards also create a hierarchy of space, which is not only expressed by the inclusion of the courtyard at all, but also is expressed through the roof form. Different spaces are grouped together by use, and the form of the roof is determined by the use of the space. This differentiation in roof form helps reinforce the cellular nature of the project through the exterior, and creates a dynamism that contrasts the monumentality of the project.

REHAB BASEL COURTYARD

ROMAN VILLA PLAN

COURTYARD IN BASEL’S TOWN HALL


COURTYARD LOCATION


TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, AND DETAIL/HAPTICITY

Originally, the materiality and tectonics of the building were going to be massive, heavy, and permanent-feeling. This was to reinforce the historical aspect of the building, to make the building feel like it has “always been there.” However, through material study, a more artificial material was chosen. The lightness of the chosen materials, which are translucent glass that is shaded by aluminum louvers, contrasts with the monumentality of the building. A massive facade would make the building look too heavy in the landscape, and it would easily blend into the landscape. The goal of the facility is to be a cultural landmark, so the facade should express the building as an object in the landscape. The lightness of the facade construction also supports the courtyard condition, where glass is used to dissolve the line between interior and exterior. During dawn and dusk hours, the building will glow in the landscape through the use of light within the facade, therefore marking itself in the landscape as a cultural institution. The facade also recalls the history of the site, albeit in a subtle way. The color of the glass recalls the terracotta color used in Ancient Roman construction. The facade is supported by concrete load bearing walls, which are combined with polished concrete backing walls, which subtly recall Roman concrete, but provide a contemporary feel to the building. A rougher concrete, filled with rubble and aggregate, comprise the floors of the institution, which specifically recalls the site’s historical roots. The artificial facade supports a form that recalls history, without creating a building that gets lost in the historical references and the vastness of the site.

ROMAN CONCRETE RUINS

BASEL CITY HALL

NOVARTIS BUILDING, BASEL


9 10 3

11

1

2

3

4

4 6 5

12

3 13

14

7 8

1. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH WALL 2. STRUCTURAL CASTIN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL 3. RIGID INSULATION 4. TRANSLUSCENT RIGID INSULATION 5. MAINTENANCE CATWALK 6. ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL FIN 7. TRANSLUSCENT GLASS 8. ALUMINUM LOUVER 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH CEILING 10. HEAVY TIMBER ROOF STRUCTURE 11. CORRUGATED ROOF FINISH 12. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB 13. SAND 14. GRAVEL 15. CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL

15 3

14

1

2

3

4

4

5 6 7

8

1. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH WALL 2. STRUCTURAL CASTIN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL 3. RIGID INSULATION 4. TRANSLUSCENT RIGID INSULATION 5. MAINTENANCE CATWALK 6. ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL FIN 7. TRANSLUSCENT GLASS 8. ALUMINUM LOUVER

COMPOSITE DRAWING


ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP The building proposal seeks to incorporate environmental stewardship through passive strategies that have been used in the historical typology that is connected to the site. The significance of the courtyard throughout the design also provides ample opportunities for passive strategies. This is explored through passive ventilation through the use of European windows throughout the facade and the interior, informal courtyards. The courtyards also provide drainage through the incorporation of permeable surfaces throughout the building. This strategy, combined with the slope of the roofs towards the interior of the courtyards, provides passive drainage that also can be used to foster the growth of native plant life within the project. Daylight strategies include the use of courtyards for natural daylighting, which not only provides a more pleasant user experience of the building, but cuts down on energy costs. Solar panels will be incorporated into the building, but their location remains undetermined at this stage in the project. All of these strategies mentioned have been used by the Ancient Romans and then throughout the passage of time. Simple passive strategies through the incorporation of the courtyards throughout the building improves energy use and is a low-cost method. Future methods still further to be explored is solar power panel location, and incorporation of excavated site materials within the aggregate and rubble of the concrete.

AREAS OF REQUIRED SOLAR PROTECTION

AREAS OF PERMEABLE SURFACES

PASSIVE VENTILATION STRATEGY


DAYLIGHTING

SUN SHADING - LOUVERS

VENTILATION

SO

LA

RR

AD

IAT

ION

VENTILATION THROUGH COURTYARDS

SOLAR HEAT GAIN / DAYLIGHTING

REFLECTED SOLAR HEAT

PERMEABLE GROUND SURFACE FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

VENTILATION THROUGH GLAZING

PASSIVE STRATEGIES DIAGRAM


SITE STRATEGIES Site strategies involve placing the building on the site in a tactical way that encourages growth of the site, and exploration of the site by the visitor. The approach to the site is determined by the axiality of the road that cuts through the site from north to south. This road is also used as a walking path for visitors to get to the site from the Amphitheater to the north. Aligning the approach, and the building, along this path creates a clear sense of approach. Secondary approach is to the east of the site, where visitors and employees may park their cars. Approaching the building this way allows one to walk through the outdoor exhibit space, where exhibitions of ruins may be kept outdoors. To the north of the site, there is potential archaeological excavation to be done, so the site is kept clear in that area. Walking paths are provided so visitors may make their way to the north when excavation is complete. Placement of the building in the southwest corner of the site allows for expansion of the storage modules in the future, without disturbing future excavation projects. Vegetation is placed around the site to mitigate noise, especially from the highway that runs along the south of the site.

Roadways Primary Secondary

SITE FIGURE GROUND

SITE ROAD DIAGRAM

SITE CIRCULATION DIAGRAM

RUINS LOCATION DIAGRAM

AXIAL APPROACH

POTENTIAL FUTURE EXCAVATION

OUTDOOR EXHIBIT SPACE


SITE PLAN


PLAN ORGANIZATION

Most Public Most Private

The organization of the plan is determined by the cellular nature predetermined by the compositional studies done in Assignment Two. The cellular plan was adapted because it allowed the incorporation of informal courtyards throughout the building, as well as formalized courtyards. Program is separated into cells for each specific use, which are all separate from one another. The use of informal courtyards help reinforce the separation of program spaces. Movement between cells is facilitated through anterooms, which follow the square geometric proportions which determine the overall form of the exterior edge of the plan. Adjacencies of the program are determined by the public-toprivate gradient, where public spaces are on the east side of the plan, and as one moves across the plan, spaces become more private. Formal courtyards are placed on the exterior walls of the building, which reinforce the indoor/outdoor condition of the courtyards themselves. This was also done to give reason to the roof forms expressed on the exterior of the building.

ARRIVAL SEQUENCE GRADIENT

TOMIHIRO PLAN ANALYSIS Program Space

Movement Space

DEFINITION OF PROGRAM SPACES

DEFINITION OF MOVEMENT SPACES


1

2

11

8

1. EQUIPMENT ROOM 2. CLOAKROOM 3. RECEPTION / INFORMATION 4. CAFE 5. WASTE / RECYCLING 6. LAUNDRY 7. IT 8. MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 9. ARTIFACTS GALLERY 10. LABORATORY 11. MEETING ROOM 12. COMMON OFFICE SPACE 13. LOCKERROOM 14. DIRECTOR’S OFFICE 15. VAULT 16. STORAGE MODULE

11

12

13

14

7

3

9

15

16

4 10

5

6

10

16

7

FIRST FLOOR PLAN


The plan also features a mezzanine space within the artifacts gallery space. This allows visitors to peer down into the laboratory spaces to gain a deeper understanding of the archaeological process. The laboratory spaces are often concealed from visitors, disconnecting them from the overall process and limiting experience to viewing artifacts in an enclosed, gallery style manner. The mezzanine allows visitors to experience the labs in a safe manner, while also maintaining the cellular nature of the plan. The mezzanine also prevents the archaeologists from feeling like they are being watched in a fishbowl. The visitors being raised up above eye-level moves them out of sight from the archaeologists, which creates a more pleasant working environment for them. The raised mezzanine being open to the gallery space also creates a clear visual connection for those on the ground floor of the gallery, which promotes more use of the mezzanine space.


9. ARTIFACTS GALLERY 10. LABORATORY 17. LABORATORY-VIEWING PLATFORM

9

10

17

10

MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN



SECTION AA



SECTION BB


NORTH ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION


SOUTH ELEVATION


4 STRUCTURE


The development of the structure revealed deeper exploration into the relationship of the structural system and the mechanical system, as well as zero-carbon initiatives. The structural narrative of combining concrete load-bearing walls, as well as heavy timber post and beam construction, remained the same from the previous design stage. However, deeper exploration in thermal characteristics of the concrete revealed a much deeper relationship between the structure and other design initiatives. Ultimately, through the development of the structure, relation to the site context and past architectural typologies still remain present and expressed in the structure, and therefore the form, of the building.


FINAL CONCEPT PLACE, CONTEXT, AND SCALE The structural system expresses the archaic nature of the project by relating to the contextual roots of the site. As much as possible, the structural system relates to the Ancient Roman construction typology of building load bearing walls with concrete. Concrete is treated as a structural system as well as the interior finish system; the exposed structure reinforces the connection to the site. Having that connection to ancient ways of building reinforces the visitor’s experience of Augusta Raurica as an ancient civilization. The structural method ties together both the program and the site, creating one interwoven system of contextual reference. That way, the visitor can experience how a concrete building was built in the past, and see how the basis of building today is based on ancient techniques. The exposed structural system would bring the past to the present, creating a full-circle experience of the building.

HEAVY TIMBER SUPPORTING CURTAIN WALL

SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, AND IDENTITY The structure contributes to the overall experience of the space by creating a monolithic experience on the interior. The uniformity of the exposed structural system throughout most of the building unifies the space, which could feel too disjointed due to the cellular nature of the plan, if it is without a unifying design element. The exposed concrete also creates a visual relationship with the visitor that this is an archaeological space. Concrete elements come from the earth, which relates to the excavation of the earth done by an archaeological institution. This would not be seen if the structure was hidden, so the structure is exposed throughout the entirety of the building. The structural system would relate to the archaeological artifacts on display in the facility, creating a full-circle experience.

THERMAL INSULATION OF BIO-AGGREGATES

PERLITE LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE


MEZZANINE STRUCTURAL CONCEPT

SECTION STRUCTURAL CONCEPT

FIRST FLOOR STRUCTURAL CONCEPT


ORGANIZATION AND ARTICULATION Almost all of the areas of the building utilize concrete load bearing walls. The load bearing walls distinguish program space from program space, which therefore reinforces the cellular nature of the plan. The transition spaces, such as the informal courtyards and anterooms are treated with concrete partition walls. This creates the uniformity of materiality to connect the spaces, but the difference in wall thickness separates these different functional spaces. The separation in structure occurs at the formal courtyards. These elements are light and bring in air, so they are treated separately from the heavy structural elements of the loadbearing concrete. The curtain walls that surround the courtyard spaces are supported by heavy timber columns and beams. This relates back to the site’s greater context of Switzerland, where wood is an abundant resource. This creates moments of relief from the heavy concrete structural system. The exposed structure creates an interior relationship that can be glanced at from the exterior through the glass of the courtyards, but creates a hermetic interior experience of discovering different programmatic spaces through little separation of materiality of the structural system.

SIZING OF ELEMENTS

RESISTANCE OF LATERAL FORCES THROUGH RIGIDITY OF MASS

GRAVITY LOAD TRANSFER THROUGH LOADBEARING WALLS

GRAVITY LOAD TRANSFER THROUGH HEAVY TIMBER FRAME

TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, DETAIL, AND HAPTICITY Decisions about structural systems are made through the overall relation of the context of the site through different levels of design throughout the building. The context of the site, or more specifically, the relation of the Ancient Roman building typology throughout all design decisions remains constant, even throughout selecting the structural system. The structural system, which is very much rooted in natural materials, contrasts the exterior envelope in terms of creating a hermetic experience. The interior contrasts the exterior, which is unexpected, until one enters the building or peers through the courtyard. The exterior relates a modern relationship to the surrounding city, and society, while the interior transports back in time to more traditional building methods.


STRUCTURAL PLAN 01. PRECAST INSULATED THERMALLY ACTIVE CONCRETE LOADBEARING WALLS - 2’-6” 02. THERMALLY ACTIVATED SITECAST TWO-WAY CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB - 8”

01 03

03. HEAVY TIMBER COLUMN 12X12

02

FIRST FLOOR STRUCTURAL PLAN


ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP The structure of the building relates to the sustainable agenda for this project through utilizing strategies that lower concrete’s carbon footprint. While concrete’s carbon footprint is relatively low, it has a high embodied energy. Initially, the building is designed for expansion, rather than demolition then new construction, so the risk of releasing the embodied carbon is lower. Secondly, thermally insulated concrete is achieved through the use of perlite and bioaggregates. Bio-aggregates have a relatively high thermally-insulating value, and are made from organic materials. The high insulating value of the structural system reduces the need for extra artificial insulation, and promotes high thermal mass, which reduces the need for mechanically-assisted heating and cooling systems. The heavy timber aspect of the project also utilizes organic materials, and an abundant natural resource for the local region. Wood has a low carbon footprint, and low embodied carbon. The restrained use of heavy timber throughout the building is conscious towards deforestation and looks to explore other sustainable structure methods through expanding and altering classing loadbearing concrete construction.

STRUCTURAL PLAN 01. PRECAST INSULATED THERMALLY ACTIVE CONCRETE LOADBEARING WALLS - 2’-6” 02. THERMALLY ACTIVATED SITECAST TWO-WAY CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB - 8”

01 03

03. HEAVY TIMBER COLUMN 12X12

02

MEZZANINE STRUCTURAL PLAN


STRUCTURAL AXON 01. FOUNDATION -SITECAST STRIP FOOTING 8’X3’ -SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS - 3’-0” -PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS - 2’X2’ 02. LOADBEARING WALL SYSTEM -SITECAST THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE LOADBEARING WALL - 2’-6” 03. FLOOR SYSTEM -SITECAST THERMALLY ACTIVATED CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB - 10” 03. COURTYARD FRAMING -SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM COLUMN - 12”X12” -SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM - 12”X12” 01

02

04. ROOF FRAMING 03 -SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM GIRDER - 16”X36” -SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM - 8”X36” 05. ROOF PANELLING -CLT PANELS - 10’X40’X3.5”

04

05

06




5 PASSIVE/ACTIVE STRATEGIES


The development of the active and passive systems of the project came down to simplifying the systems for the active systems, and developing the strategy for the passive system. The simplification of the active strategies benefits the cost of the project, and keeps the project clear in intention in all levels of the design. The development of the envelope helped develop the rationale for using a glass facade, as the envelope contributes now just as much to the passive strategies as the form of the building and the courtyard conditions throughout the entire project.


PASSIVE STRATEGIES The passive strategies for heating, cooling, ventilation, and stormwater management are largely provided by the form of the building itself. The courtyard conditions, which influence operable window placement, form of the building, roof form, and permeable surface conditions, are found throughout the building, so the passive strategies are dispersed throughout the building. The form of the building, inspired by the Roman Villa typology, along with the organization of the building, allows a variety of passive strategies to be implemented, which were originally discovered by the Ancient Romans. The passive strategies allow this ancient typology to shine through the building, and show visitors how ancient construction methods aren’t solely about aesthetics, but are highly related to performance as well. The experience of the visitor with these passive strategies demonstrates the connection to Ancient Roman culture in a tangible way.

DAYLIGHTING STRATEGY

VENTILATION STRATEGY - OPERABLE WINDOWS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT - PERMEABLE SURFACES SUNSHADING STRATEGY

AXONOMETRIC OF PASSIVE STRATEGIES


Throughout the building, the lower portion of the glazing consists of operable windows. The operable windows are vertical-pivoted windows, which allow the windows to be opened either way vertically, which increases the flexibility of the space. The operable windows are present in both the formal courtyard conditions, as well as the formal courtyards with the curtain wall condition. The required area of operable windows to be considered as a reliable ventilation strategy is 15% of the building’s floor area. The area of the building is almost 33,000 square feet, so the amount of operable window area has to be almost 5,000 square feet. The actual operable window area of the project is about 5,200 square feet, which meets the requirements. This allows the AHU and ERV units for the active strategies to be sized much smaller.

VENTILATION STRATEGY - OPERABLE WINDOWS TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING: 32.843 SQ. FT. AREA REQUIRED OF OPERABLE WINDOWS: 4,926 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA OF OPERABLE WINDOWS: 5,257 SQ. FT.

PASSIVE VENTILATION


Both the form of the building and the structural depth of the walls allow for sun shading to be possible. The depth of the skeleton of the building walls, which is 2’-6”, creates a shallow overhang for the inset glazing on the exterior window conditions. This small overhang allows for the windows to be partially shaded in the summer, and receive daylight in the winter. The depth of the wall increases with the depth of the envelope system, which brings the total depth of the wall closer to 5’ deep, which creates more shading in the summer months. The inset courtyards also receive shading in the form of the building. The tall walls and pitched roofs surrounding the courtyards create shade on the interior, making them a pleasant place to spend longer durations of time in.

SUNSHADING STRATEGY, PROVIDED BY STRUCTURAL DEPTH OF WALLS AND DEPTH OF ENVELOPE, AND FORM

PASSIVE SUN SHADING


Stormwater management is taken care of in terms of passive strategies as permeable surfaces within the informal and formal courtyards. The formal courtyards use planters with soil that allows both vegetation - small trees and shrubs - to grow, but also for excess stormwater to be absorbed. The informal courtyards also have planters but to a much shallower extent, so that small shrubs can be planted there. Since the informal courtyards do not have pitched roofs that fall in towards them, the stormwater management is less intense in necessity. The shallow planters shall be enough to manage the stormwater that falls into the informal courtyards. Permeable surfaces surrounding the perimeter of the building, with either grass or permeable pavers, also absorb excess stormwater around the perimeter of the building.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT - PERMEABLE SURFACES IN COURTYARD SPACES

PASSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT


Wind protection of outdoor spaces, particularly both courtyard conditions, are created by the inset form of the courtyards within the building. The tall walls and pitched roofs prevent wind from entering these spaces, especially the truly interior courtyards. The courtyards that share an exterior condition aren’t as fully wind protected as the other courtyards, but depending on what direction the wind is coming from, being enclosed from three sides should be enough to have a comfortable experience within the courtyards on a breezy day, which is quite common in Basel.

WIND PROTECTION STRATEGY - THROUGH BUILDING FORM AND PLACEMENT OF EXTERIOR SPACES

PASSIVE WIND PROTECTION OF OUTDOOR SPACES


The envelope design further reinforces the passive strategies for the building. The glass facade captures solar radiation and allows solar heat gain to pass through. The solar heat gain then passes through the high-mass, insulating concrete wall. This allows for heat to pass through the walls and heat the interior in the winter, and keep the building cool during the day in the summer and warm the building up at night in the summer. During the summer, when the solar heat gain may be too much for the space to be comfortable, the aluminum louvers on the exterior of the facade prevent excess light from passing through the glass facade. The openness of the facade underneath the bottom edge of the glass and the top edge of the glass, protected by a metal service grate and insectscreens, allows air to pass through. The vent at the top of the enclosure allows for air to pass through the top of the facade. Excess hot air can also pass through the envelope and through the vent to maintain a comfortable experience in the interior of the building.

VENTILATION THROUGH RAISED FACADE AND LOUVERS SOLAR HEAT GAIN SOLAR HEAT GAIN TO INTERNAL HEAT GAIN THROUGH HIGH MASS CONCRETE WALL

SUN SHADING BY LOUVERS

ENVELOPE STRATEGIES


DESIGN/PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS When developing the active system strategies for this building, simplifying the initial active strategy was necessary in order to not muddle the active systems and how they relate to the overall design missions that the project is trying to achieve. The active systems were reduced down to radiant flooring to provide heating and cooling, radiant wall systems to provide cooling, and AHU in high-occupancy spaces to provide cooling and ventilation, and ERVs to provide ventilation to most of the building. The radiant systems were important to include because it references hypocaust systems, which were the techniques used by Ancient Romans to heat and cool buildings. The radiant systems were included in the wall because of the deep loadbearing concrete walls, as radiant systems work well with concrete systems. The AHU unit was included because it could be used minimally enough to only service the two highoccupancy spaces, which only sometimes are high-occupancy, and provides both cooling and ventilation. The rest of the spaces in the building, with a smaller, more predictable occupancy load, can be serviced by the cooling of the radiant floor system alone, as well as the ventilation from the operable windows. However, in the winter months, forced-air-ventilation (ERVs) units were included when opening the windows isn’t realistic. ERVs were chosen because they are the most sustainable option for ventilation.


HEATING

HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THESE HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED SPACES BASED ON OCCUPANCY LOAD. ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS SINCE THE OCCUPANCY OF THESE SPACES IS LIKELY TO CHANGE, THE AMOUNT OF HEAT RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND. SHOULD BE ABLE TO CHANGE BASED ON

HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND.

SEASON AND OCCUPANCY.

COOLING

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THESE SPACES BASED ON SEASON AND OCCUPANCY LOAD. THERE MAY BE VERY HIGH OCCUPANCY OF THESE SPACES AT FLUCTUATING TIMES, SO COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED YEAR-ROUND AND WITH

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND. COOLING CAN ALSO BE PROVIDED BY THE OPERABLE WINDOWS WHEN WIND IS

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND. COOLING CAN ALSO BE PROVIDED BY THE OPERABLE WINDOWS WHEN WIND IS

PRESENT.

PRESENT.

VENTILATION WILL BE PROVIDED PASSIVELY THROUGH OPERABLE WINDOWS, BUT BECAUSE OF THE HIGH OCCUPANCY LOAD, THERE SHOULD BE ACTIVE SYSTEMS TO

VENTILATION CAN BE PROVIDED ENTIRELY BY OPERABLE WINDOWS THROUGH PASSIVE VENTILATION DURING WARMER MONTHS. DURING COLDER MONTHS MECHANICAL

VENTILATION CAN BE PROVIDED ENTIRELY BY OPERABLE WINDOWS THROUGH PASSIVE VENTILATION DURING WARMER MONTHS. DURING COLDER MONTHS MECHANICAL

SUPPLEMENT THE VARYING OCCUPANCY.

VENTILATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED.

VENTILATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED.

GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WILL BE IN THE FLOOR SYSTEM, GEOTHERMAL RADIANT COOLING IN THE WALL STRUCTURE, AHU SYSTEM FOR ADDITIONAL COOLING WHEN NECESSARY AND FOR VENTILATION, COOLING

GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING FLOORING, AS WELL AS ERV FOR VENTILATION.

GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING FLOORING, AS WELL AS ERV FOR VENTILATION.

VARYING INTENSITY.

VENTILATION

POTENTIAL SYSTEMS

CONTROLLED BY VAV BOXES.


HEATING

COOLING

VENTILATION

HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS

HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS

HEATING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS

RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND.

RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND.

RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND.

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND. COOLING CAN ALSO BE PROVIDED BY THE OPERABLE WINDOWS WHEN WIND IS

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND. COOLING CAN ALSO BE PROVIDED BY THE OPERABLE WINDOWS WHEN WIND IS

COOLING SHOULD BE PROVIDED BASED ON SEASON, SINCE OCCUPANCY REMAINS RELATIVELY CONSTANT YEAR ROUND. COOLING CAN ALSO BE PROVIDED BY THE OPERABLE WINDOWS WHEN WIND IS

PRESENT.

PRESENT.

PRESENT.

MECHANICAL VENTILATION SHOULD BE VENTILATION CAN BE PROVIDED ENTIRELY PROVIDED YEAR ROUND IN ORDER TO BY OPERABLE WINDOWS IN THE WARMER DEAL WITH POSSIBLY TOXIC / COMBUSITBLE MONTHS, HOWEVER, DURING COLDER MONTHS, MECHANICAL VENTILATION MATERIALS. SHOULD BE ACTIVELY USED.

GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING FLOORING, ERV FOR

POTENTIAL SYSTEMS

VENTILATION.

GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING FLOORING, ERV FOR VENTILATION.

VENTILATION SHOULD BE ACTIVELY PROVIDED YEAR ROUND DUE TO THE SERVICE NATURE OF THESE SPACES.

GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING FLOORING, ERV FOR VENTILATION


The different zones for the active systems are determined by the use-type of the space, as spaces with similar uses will have similar needs for active systems. The different zones are as follows: the high-occupancy public spaces, the low-occupancy public spaces, the service spaces, the administration spaces, the storage spaces, and the laboratory spaces. These spaces vary in use so different requirements of the active systems are present. For example, the multipurpose room with 200 people in it at once will have a different need than the storage module with 5 people in it at once. The storage module would have different needs than the laboratory spaces, even with the same occupancy, because of the activities that occur in a laboratory. Although there are different uses throughout the building, the mechanical equipment can remain similar throughout the building. However, sizing the elements are dependent on the area of the zones as well as the use of each zone.

MECHANICAL ZONES - GROUND FLOOR

MECHANICAL ZONES - MEZZANINE

MECHANICAL ZONES - SECTION AA

MECHANICAL ZONES - SECTION BB


GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING FLOOR SYSTEM PLAN


GEOTHERMAL RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM PLAN


VENTILATION PLAN


DRAINAGE PLAN




AXONOMETRIC OF RADIANT FLOORING SYSTEM

AXONOMETRIC OF RADIANT WALL SYSTEM

AXONOMETRIC OF A.H.U. SYSTEM

AXONOMETRIC OF E.R.V. SYSTEM


AXONOMETRIC OF ALL ACTIVE SYSTEMS


6 BUILDING ENVELOPE


The building envelope is designed to bridge the gap between a building that references its historical context in every layer on the interior, and an industrial building on the exterior. The envelope is designed both for an industrial aesthetic as well as an example of passive design for the exterior cladding. While the original concept for the facade has not changed much since the Development of the Preliminary Design step of this project, more technical layers were introduced to bring the envelope to its full potential. Technical explorations of the envelope helped me learn how to actually construct a detail like this, as well as choose the right materials to add to the zero-carbon agenda of the project.


FINAL VERSION PLACE, CONTEXT, AND SCALE The envelope helps define the building as an object in the landscape. The building’s form could get easily lost in the landscape if a more natural materiality for the envelope was chosen, since the site is so expansive and basically a large field. The color of the facade, along with the backlighting of the facade, allowing the object to glow, defines the building in the landscape and is a marker for the Augusta Raurica archaeological organization. Since the building is small and compact, the facade helps define the building in the landscape through color. SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, AND IDENTITY The facade helps generate the building as an iconic object in the landscape, which helps define the Augusta Raurica archaeological organization as an institution. The facade stands apart from the natural materials of the ruins, so it allows this building to be almost like a “landing place” for the organization and the visitors. The facade also creates a hidden experience for the visitor, as one approaches the building, the facade suggests a very modern and industrial-style building, but on the interior, the construction methods and materiality reference ancient construction methods to contrast the facade. ORGANIZATION AND ARTICULATION The facade is organized based on a monolithic, repetitive nature. The only time the facade is broken up is to define the courtyard areas, which are cladded with a polished concrete finish wall, to give hints about what lies in the interior of the building. The facade is kept repetitive and monolithic to further define the building as an object in the landscape, and reinforce that industrial feeling of the exterior of the building. The articulation of the aluminum louvers on the facade are kept at the same distance apart from each louver to unite the facade and once again, give the feeling of an industrial-style building.

ROMAN CONCRETE RUINS

BASEL CITY HALL

NOVARTIS BUILDING, BASEL


A

B

A

LEGEND 1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING 8’X3’ 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - 3’-0” 3. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 4” 4. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 6” 5. GRAVEL - 6” 6. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB - 10” 7. SCREED - 4” 8. GEOTHERMAL RADIANT FLOORING 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH TILE FLOORING WITH 1/4” MORTAR- 3/16” 10. CAST-IN-PLACE LOAD-BEARING THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE WALL - 2-6” 11. RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM 12. ALUMINUM TUBE - 2” 13. ALUMINUM MAINTENANCE GRATE - 2” DEEP 14. LED STRIP LIGHTING 15. LOW-E TERRA-COTTA TINTED GLASS PANELS 16. TERRA-COTTA TINTED ALUMINUM FIN - 1’-0” DEEP 17. INSECT SCREEN 18. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM 16”X36” 19. SOUTHERN PINE CLT PANEL 10’X40’X3.5” 20. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH - 2” 21. ALUMINUM ROOF FLASHING 22. GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE PLATE 23. DRAINAGE PIPE 24. STEEL TUBE FRAMING 25. MAINTENANCE LADDER 26. ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM

5'-6" 3

20

21 19 26

18 22

6'-3"

17

16

11

15

12

12

14

13

24

25 10

7

8

9

3 5

6

2 4

3 5

6

1

23

ELEVATION

SECTION

A

PLAN

AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/2" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/04/2022

ASSEMBLY COMPOSITE

A3-01

COMPOSITE DRAWING


TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, DETAIL AND HAPTICITY The glass and aluminum materiality were chosen to reinforce the industrial nature of the building’s exterior, as well as allow light to pass through the facade, to create a glowing object in the landscape during dusk and dawn hours. The materiality is kept simple such as tinted glass and aluminum louvers so that the facade is understated, yet creates a memorable image of the building. The facade also is a haptic device that mostly hides the interior materiality behind the glass, but the transparency of the glass gives hints of what lies inside for those who look closely. Otherwise, the interior materiality is a surprise for visitors, and reflects the historical construction methods that contrast the modern construction methods of the facade. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP The facade plays an important role in the environmental stewardship aspect of the project as it aids in the performance of the building skeleton and envelope as a whole. The glass facade allows sunlight to pass through which allows solar heat gain to pass through the facade and pass through to the high-mass concrete walls. The walls then allow the heat gain to slowly pass through the wall and into the interior to warm the space in the winter and summer nights when temperatures drop. The aluminum louvers help block some of the excess sunlight that may enter through the facade especially in the summer months, which would help keep temperatures cool. The openness of the facade allows air to pass through from the bottom of the facade and up through the vent in the upper portion of the facade. Excess heat that escapes from the top of the concrete wall through the insulation between the concrete and heavy-timber roof structure passes through the vent as well.

FINISH DIAGRAM

INSULATION DIAGRAM

WATER DIAGRAM

MOISTURE DIAGRAM


LEGEND

20 19

3

21 18 26

4

16 15

14

13 12 24

10

7

8

1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING 8’X3’ 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - 3’-0” 3. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 4” 4. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 6” 5. GRAVEL - 6” 6. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB - 10” 7. SCREED - 4” 8. GEOTHERMAL RADIANT FLOORING 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH TILE FLOORING WITH 1/4” MORTAR- 3/16” 10. CAST-IN-PLACE LOAD-BEARING THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE WALL - 2-6” 11. RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM 12. ALUMINUM TUBE - 2” 13. ALUMINUM MAINTENANCE GRATE - 2” DEEP 14. LED STRIP LIGHTING 15. LOW-E TERRA-COTTA TINTED GLASS PANELS 16. TERRA-COTTA TINTED ALUMINUM FIN - 1’-0” DEEP 17. INSECT SCREEN 18. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM 16”X36” 19. SOUTHERN PINE CLT PANEL 10’X40’X3.5” 20. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH - 2” 21. ALUMINUM ROOF FLASHING 22. GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE PLATE 23. DRAINAGE PIPE 24. STEEL TUBE FRAMING 25. MAINTENANCE LADDER 26. ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM

9

3

6

5

4 2

6

5

3 5 1

23

3D ASSEMBLY




7 FINAL NARRATIVE


The final design ultimately reflects both aspects of the new facility for the Augusta Raurica archaeology organization: the modern relation of archaeology to our lives, as well as archaeology’s deep connection to historical roots. The building aims to unite these two aspects to create a complete experience for both the visitors as well as the employees of the organization. The building’s core design elements reference the site’s historical past as a major seat in the Holy Roman empire, through form, construction methods, materiality, and passive and active systems. The building also references today’s modern construction methods to be a modern institution through materiality and construction methods. The building aims to create a full-circle experience for all occupants of the building and remain an important space for the archaeologists of Augusta Raurica. Context envelopes the building entirely.


GENERAL SUMMARY The project’s site is located in Basel, Switzerland. Basel is one of Switzerland’s major metropolitan areas, and serves as the metropolitan hub amongst the borders of Switzerland, France, and Germany. Basel has a rich history shown through its architecture, especially in the Old Town District in the center of the city, but has also developed its own modern culture through being a major center for contemporary architecture through buildings done by many starchitects, such as Herzog and deMueron, Renzo Piano, and Frank Gehry. Basel also has a long archaeological history, as the city was once the major seat of the PrinceBishopric during the Holy Roman Empire. This old settlement is Augusta Raurica, and is located just south-east of the heart of Basel. This is where the site is located. The site is surrounded by a Roman amphitheater to the north, a colosseum to the left, and modern residential development to the east. The site is a relatively flat, wide open field. There is a large amount of opportunity for vast architectural interventions, and strong development of the site as well.


RHEINTHERMEN

KASTELLMAUER

KAISERAUGST

ROMISCHE ZEIGELEI

AUGST AMPITHEATER

SITE


During early explorations of the site, the program of the building was unknown, except for that the building would be an archaeological facility. Early site development involved the recalling of the site’s past vernacular, and incorporating past vernacular elements in a meaningful way on the site. This investigation included ways to incorporate the site within the building itself, as the site has a lot of natural settings that would be a shame if wasted by being covered completely by architectural intervention. This is where the exploration of multiple courtyards began. In the early site exploration, multiple courtyards were used to encourage movement between different wings of the building, as well as to allow visitors to explore that inside-outside connection within the site. The use of courtyards also recalls back to the historical vernacular of the site, as the use of courtyards was essential to the Roman Villa typology. Early site exploration also included outdoor exhibit spaces, where ruins could be displayed outside and be included as part of the approach sequence. The next step of the assignment involved a series of compositional studies, fostered by the study of the geometrical rulings of plans done by other architects. While six plans were studied, a plan by Tomihiro was chosen as the compositional method that would influence the design of the Augusta Raurica archaeological facility. The Tomihiro plan is a cellular plan that separates rooms of the program into distinct cells that limit movement to distinct paths. The spaces between the rooms of the program create informal courtyards. The creation of informal courtyards by the cellular nature of the plan is what determined the adaptation of the cellular plan for this project. Courtyards were to become an essential design principle of this facility, whose organization would be determined by the cellular nature of the plan. Through the massing development of the early exploration of a cellular plan for the facility, a monumental building emerged, with the courtyards being hidden from the visitor from the exterior of the building. The interior courtyards would be a hermetic experience for the visitor, and would help reinforce the Roman Villa Courtyard typology being explored within the project.

INITIAL SITE CONCEPT

TOMIHIRO GEOMETRY STUDY

INITIAL INTERPRETATION OF CELLULAR PLAN


BUILDING STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT


PLACE, CONTEXT, AND SCALE The facility at Augusta Raurica lends itself to being a monumental building through its siting. The site itself is very long, and can easily fit multiple facilities on it. The program of the facility also lends itself towards monumentality, as the incorporation of lab and storage spaces give the building an industrial meaning. Monumentality is also explored in Basel’s downtown architecture, such as the Kunstmusuem, which is a major cultural institution for the city. The facility seeks to be a cultural institution, which requires a monumentality within the building, whether that be through massing, material, etc. Ancient Roman typology also explores monumentality through long, solid exterior walls that open up to courtyards within. This method is explored within the massing of the Augusta Raurica project. The early massing describes this condition, where the massing on the exterior of the building is solid, and form is given to the building through dynamic roof shapes, whose placement is determined by the placement of courtyards in plan. The roof form is influenced by the Roman Villa roof typology, but abstracted in order to bring the facility to a modern time. Throughout the development of the project, the roof forms have evolved, but the necessity of a dynamic roof shape to bring movement to a monumental building has remained constant.

KUNSTMUSEUM, BASEL

ANCIENT ROMAN TYPOLOGY

ANCIENT ROMAN TYPOLOGY


INITIAL MASSING DEVELOPMENT


SPACE, CHARACTER, ATMOSPHERE, AND IDENTITY

There is a strong historical underpinning throughout the entire design of the facility. The program of the facility, an archaeological gallery, lab, and storage space, implies deep connection to history already. The historical connection of the site and the program has been manifested in the design through the adaptation of aspects from Roman building typologies, and incorporating them to fit the needs of a modern archaeological facility. While the form of the building itself is determined by the placement of the courtyards within the interior of the building, the most important identifying aspect of the building is the spatial structure of the building. The cellular nature of the plan allows for the incorporation of courtyards throughout the building. The cellular nature allows visitors to explore different spaces within the building as a separate experience, whose separation is enforced by the courtyard space. The visitor is also experiencing courtyard space within rooms of the program as well, which maintains an indoor / outdoor connection throughout the building. The placement of the courtyards determines the roof form, which creates a contemporary form that is recognizable, but abstracted and contemporized. Construction also plays an important role in the identity of the building. Concrete load bearing walls support the major structural requirements of the space, which does recall construction methods used in the Roman Settlement, further reinforcing the historical connection to the site. The courtyard spaces contrast this heavy construction method by being constructed of curtain wall systems with Glulam supports. This incorporates modern construction methods within the building, and recalls Swiss vernacular as a whole while supporting a more environmentally-conscious construction method.

ROMAN WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPOLOGY

ROMAN CONCRETE WALL CONSTRUCTION

ROMAN VILLA ROOF FORM


GLULAM COLUMN LOCATION CONCRETE LOADBEARING WALL LOCATION

STRUCTURAL DIAGRAM


ORGANIZATION AND ARTICULATION The project’s organization is determined by the notion that each programmatic space is a separate cell, a separate entity, composed together to make a cohesive building. Each programmatic space, broken up as a cell within the building, is organized within an exterior geometrical constraint, which reinforces the monumentality of the project. The adjacencies of the program space is determined by public use, semi-public use, and private use, along with circulation considerations. These spatial relationships are expressed through the interior of the building, where the cellular nature is fully expressed. The clear separation of programmatic space creates the informal courtyard condition, where visitors are free to enter these small gardens that are exposed to daylight, fresh air, and explore informal circulation paths. Larger, more formal courtyards are expressed on the interior and exterior of the building. This creates an indoor / outdoor relationship to the site, and allows visitors to see the courtyard from the exterior of the building and be intrigued to enter the building. The formalized courtyards also create a hierarchy of space, which is not only expressed by the inclusion of the courtyard at all, but also is expressed through the roof form. Different spaces are grouped together by use, and the form of the roof is determined by the use of the space. This differentiation in roof form helps reinforce the cellular nature of the project through the exterior, and creates a dynamism that contrasts the monumentality of the project.

REHAB BASEL COURTYARD

ROMAN VILLA PLAN

COURTYARD IN BASEL’S TOWN HALL


COURTYARD LOCATION


TECTONICS, MATERIALITY, AND DETAIL/HAPTICITY

Originally, the materiality and tectonics of the building were going to be massive, heavy, and permanent-feeling. This was to reinforce the historical aspect of the building, to make the building feel like it has “always been there.” However, through material study, a more artificial material was chosen. The lightness of the chosen materials, which are translucent glass that is shaded by aluminum louvers, contrasts with the monumentality of the building. A massive facade would make the building look too heavy in the landscape, and it would easily blend into the landscape. The goal of the facility is to be a cultural landmark, so the facade should express the building as an object in the landscape. The lightness of the facade construction also supports the courtyard condition, where glass is used to dissolve the line between interior and exterior. During dawn and dusk hours, the building will glow in the landscape through the use of light within the facade, therefore marking itself in the landscape as a cultural institution. The facade also recalls the history of the site, albeit in a subtle way. The color of the glass recalls the terracotta color used in Ancient Roman construction. The facade is supported by concrete load bearing walls, which are combined with polished concrete backing walls, which subtly recall Roman concrete, but provide a contemporary feel to the building. A rougher concrete, filled with rubble and aggregate, comprise the floors of the institution, which specifically recalls the site’s historical roots. The artificial facade supports a form that recalls history, without creating a building that gets lost in the historical references and the vastness of the site.

ROMAN CONCRETE RUINS

BASEL CITY HALL

NOVARTIS BUILDING, BASEL


A

B

A

LEGEND 1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING 8’X3’ 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - 3’-0” 3. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 4” 4. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 6” 5. GRAVEL - 6” 6. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB - 10” 7. SCREED - 4” 8. GEOTHERMAL RADIANT FLOORING 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH TILE FLOORING WITH 1/4” MORTAR- 3/16” 10. CAST-IN-PLACE LOAD-BEARING THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE WALL - 2-6” 11. RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM 12. ALUMINUM TUBE - 2” 13. ALUMINUM MAINTENANCE GRATE - 2” DEEP 14. LED STRIP LIGHTING 15. LOW-E TERRA-COTTA TINTED GLASS PANELS 16. TERRA-COTTA TINTED ALUMINUM FIN - 1’-0” DEEP 17. INSECT SCREEN 18. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM 16”X36” 19. SOUTHERN PINE CLT PANEL 10’X40’X3.5” 20. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH - 2” 21. ALUMINUM ROOF FLASHING 22. GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE PLATE 23. DRAINAGE PIPE 24. STEEL TUBE FRAMING 25. MAINTENANCE LADDER 26. ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM

5'-6" 3

20

21 19 26

18 22

6'-3"

17

16

11

15

12

12

14

13

24

25 10

7

8

9

3 5

6

2 4

3 5

6

1

ELEVATION

23

SECTION

A

PLAN COMPOSITE DRAWING

SCALE : 1/2"

= 1'-0"


ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP The building proposal seeks to incorporate environmental stewardship through passive strategies that have been used in the historical typology that is connected to the site. The significance of the courtyard throughout the design also provides ample opportunities for passive strategies. This is explored through passive ventilation through the use of European windows throughout the facade and the interior, informal courtyards. The courtyards also provide drainage through the incorporation of permeable surfaces throughout the building. This strategy, combined with the slope of the roofs towards the interior of the courtyards, provides passive drainage that also can be used to foster the growth of native plant life within the project. Daylight strategies include the use of courtyards for natural daylighting, which not only provides a more pleasant user experience of the building, but cuts down on energy costs. Solar panels will be incorporated into the building, but their location remains undetermined at this stage in the project. All of these strategies mentioned have been used by the Ancient Romans and then throughout the passage of time. Simple passive strategies through the incorporation of the courtyards throughout the building improves energy use and is a low-cost method. Future methods still further to be explored is solar power panel location, and incorporation of excavated site materials within the aggregate and rubble of the concrete.

AREAS OF REQUIRED SOLAR PROTECTION

AREAS OF PERMEABLE SURFACES

PASSIVE VENTILATION STRATEGY


DAYLIGHTING STRATEGY

VENTILATION STRATEGY - OPERABLE WINDOWS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT - PERMEABLE SURFACES SUNSHADING STRATEGY

AXONOMETRIC OF PASSIVE STRATEGIES


SITE STRATEGIES Site strategies involve placing the building on the site in a tactical way that encourages growth of the site, and exploration of the site by the visitor. The approach to the site is determined by the axiality of the road that cuts through the site from north to south. This road is also used as a walking path for visitors to get to the site from the Amphitheater to the north. Aligning the approach, and the building, along this path creates a clear sense of approach. Secondary approach is to the east of the site, where visitors and employees may park their cars. Approaching the building this way allows one to walk through the outdoor exhibit space, where exhibitions of ruins may be kept outdoors. To the north of the site, there is potential archaeological excavation to be done, so the site is kept clear in that area. Walking paths are provided so visitors may make their way to the north when excavation is complete. Placement of the building in the southwest corner of the site allows for expansion of the storage modules in the future, without disturbing future excavation projects. Vegetation is placed around the site to mitigate noise, especially from the highway that runs along the south of the site.

Roadways Primary Secondary

SITE FIGURE GROUND

SITE ROAD DIAGRAM

SITE CIRCULATION DIAGRAM

RUINS LOCATION DIAGRAM

AXIAL APPROACH

POTENTIAL FUTURE EXCAVATION


SITE PLAN


PLAN ORGANIZATION

Most Public Most Private

The organization of the plan is determined by the cellular nature predetermined by the compositional studies done in Assignment Two. The cellular plan was adapted because it allowed the incorporation of informal courtyards throughout the building, as well as formalized courtyards. Program is separated into cells for each specific use, which are all separate from one another. The use of informal courtyards help reinforce the separation of program spaces. Movement between cells is facilitated through anterooms, which follow the square geometric proportions which determine the overall form of the exterior edge of the plan. Adjacencies of the program are determined by the public-toprivate gradient, where public spaces are on the east side of the plan, and as one moves across the plan, spaces become more private. Formal courtyards are placed on the exterior walls of the building, which reinforce the indoor/outdoor condition of the courtyards themselves. This was also done to give reason to the roof forms expressed on the exterior of the building.

ARRIVAL SEQUENCE GRADIENT

TOMIHIRO PLAN ANALYSIS Program Space

Movement Space

DEFINITION OF PROGRAM SPACES

DEFINITION OF MOVEMENT SPACES


11

1

11

12

8

2

1. EQUIPMENT ROOM 2. CLOAKROOM 3. RECEPTION / INFORMATION 4. CAFE 5. WASTE / RECYCLING 6. LAUNDRY 7. IT 8. MULTIPURPOSE ROOM 9. ARTIFACTS GALLERY 10. LABORATORY 11. MEETING ROOM 12. COMMON OFFICE SPACE 13. LOCKERROOM 14. DIRECTOR’S OFFICE 15. VAULT 16. STORAGE MODULE

13

14

7

3

9

10

15

16

4

5

6

10

16

7

FIRST FLOOR PLAN


The plan also features a mezzanine space within the artifacts gallery space. This allows visitors to peer down into the laboratory spaces to gain a deeper understanding of the archaeological process. The laboratory spaces are often concealed from visitors, disconnecting them from the overall process and limiting experience to viewing artifacts in an enclosed, gallery style manner. The mezzanine allows visitors to experience the labs in a safe manner, while also maintaining the cellular nature of the plan. The mezzanine also prevents the archaeologists from feeling like they are being watched in a fishbowl. The visitors being raised up above eye-level moves them out of sight from the archaeologists, which creates a more pleasant working environment for them. The raised mezzanine being open to the gallery space also creates a clear visual connection for those on the ground floor of the gallery, which promotes more use of the mezzanine space.


17. LABORATORY-VIEWING PLATFORM

17

MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN



SECTION AA



EAST ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION


4 APPENDICES



REFERENCES



Page 4-5. Basel Aerial Image. https://myloview.com/wall-mural-aerial-view-over-the-city-of-basel-switzerland-and-cathedral-no-E0D6944 Page 6. Swedish Maps (4). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel-Stadt https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kanton_Genf_in_Switzerland.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince-Bishopric_of_Basel Page 8. Diagrams from Herzog and DeMueron (6). https://www.herzogdemeuron.com/index/projects/complete-works.html Page 10. Architectural Works (5). https://www.inexhibit.com/mymuseum/museum-der-kulturen-basel-herzog-de-meuron/ https://www.hisour.com/fondation-beyeler-basel-switzerland-19333/ https://www.vogue.it/en/magazine/editor-s-blog/2015/11/november-13th https://goetheanum.ch/en https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitra_Design_Museum Page 11. Kunstmuseum Image. https://segd.org/kunstmuseum-basel-light-frieze Page 12. City Images (5). https://www.theater-basel.ch/en myswitzerland.com/en-in/experiences/hip-kleinbasel/ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Augusta_Raurica_(Switzerland).jpg https://www.stadtcasino-basel.ch/en/media/press-release-we-17062020-english/ https://www.gpsmycity.com/attractions/marktplatz-(market-square)-41176.html Page 13. Old Town Image. https://www.hellotravel.com/switzerland/old-town-basel Page 14. Historical Maps (3). https://mapandmaps.com/en/archived-maps/5431-basel-switzerland-woodcut-sebastian-munster-1578.html https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Merian_Basel_1642.jpg https://www.discusmedia.com/maps/swiss_city_maps/3330/ Page 15. Historical Map. https://www.discusmedia.com/maps/swiss_city_maps/5251/ Page 17. District Images (7). https://www.iconic-world.com/directory/rheinuferpromenade-st-johann-elsasserrheinweg-basel https://www.bwb-group.com/ro/Piete/Referint/Merian-Iselin-Klinik.php https://www.statistik.bs.ch/haeufig-gefragt/wohnviertel/07-bruderholz.html https://www.immoscout24.ch/de/d/wohnung-mieten-basel/7051499 https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/green-light-for-expansion-of-geothermal-heat-project-in-riehen-switzerland/ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Altstadt_Kleinbasel,_Basel,_Switzerland_-_panoramio_(14).jpg https://www.dreamstime.com/photos-images/grossbasel-district.html Page 18. St. Johann Images (2). https://www.s-ge.com/en/article/news/20202-headquarters-baselarea https://www.report.novartis.com/en/about-us/who-we-are/novartis-company-history Page 19. Iselin, Gotthell, Bachletten. Images (2). Google Maps. https://www.statistik.bs.ch/haeufig-gefragt/wohnviertel/10-iselin.html Page 20. Gundeldingen, Bruderholtz, and Dreispitz Images (2). Google Maps. https://www.statistik.bs.ch/haeufig-gefragt/wohnviertel/07-bruderholz.html Page 21. Matthaus, Klybeck, Kleinhuningen Images (2). Google Maps.


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Port_Basel_Klein_H%C3%BCningen.jpg Page 22. Basel Nord and Riehen Images (2). https://www.worldcargonews.com/news/news/setback-for-gateway-basel-nord-63163 Google Maps. Page 23. Kleinbasel and Wettstein Images (2). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Altstadt_Kleinbasel,_Basel,_Switzerland_-_panoramio_(21).jpg https://www.myswitzerland.com/en-us/experiences/hip-kleinbasel/ Page 24. Grossbasel City Center and St. Alban Images (2). https://www.myswitzerland.com/en-ca/experiences/theater-basel/ https://stock.adobe.com/images/basel-spalentor-altstadt-stadt-altstadthauser-grossbasel-stadttor-basel-stadt-stadtrundgang-stadtmauer-spalenberg-schweiz/226243765 Page 25. Basel City Hall Image. https://www.basel.com/en/attractions/city-hall-7099cbb9f4 Page 26. Koppen Climate Maps (2). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Switzerland_K%C3%B6ppen.svg https://www.researchgate.net/figure/World-map-of-the-Koppen-Geiger-climate-classification-system-18_fig1_338189752 Page 27. Cfb Images (2). https://www.mindat.org/climate-Cfb.html Page 31. Beaufort Scale Image. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Beaufort-scale-values-and-descriptions_tbl3_318393672 Page 32. Vernacular Response Images (4). https://bookafly.com/activities/basels-old-town-historical-walking-tour-1879155 https://www.123rf.com/photo_126073731_basel-switzerland-april-17-2019-old-town-grossbasel-historical-houses-on-the-muensterberg-street-cit.html https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Novartis-Campus-Forum-3-Basel_Photo-copyright-Christian-Richters.jpg https://www.e-architect.com/switzerland/novartis-basel-headquarters Page 33. Rhine Waterfront Image. https://greatruns.com/basel-old-town-runseeing/ Page 38. Old Downtown Images (3). https://www.bs.ch/en/Portrait/cosmopolitan-basel/history.html https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadttheater_Basel_1875.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theater_Basel Page 39. Downtown Basel Images. https://www.facebook.com/Barf%C3%BCsserplatz-72538680979/ https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g188049-d3629997-Reviews-Theater_Basel-Basel.html Page 46. Augusta Raurica Historical Images (2). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince-Bishopric_of_Basel https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Augusta_Raurica_Stadtrekonstruktion_Bluetezeit_240_Zeichnung_Markus_Schaub.jpg Page 47. Augusta Raurica Archaeological Images (2). https://m.facebook.com/AugustaRaurica/photos/a.10150614978656175/10157329907786175/?comment_id=10157331905366175 https://www.augustaraurica.ch/en/support/history Page 54. Architectural Works (4). https://www.archdaily.com/371521/antinori-winery-archea-associati https://www.designboom.com/architecture/snohetta-theodore-roosevelt-presidential-library-north-dakota-08-20-2020/ Page 55. Augusta Raurica Image. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Augusta_Raurica_(Switzerland).jpg Page 56. Courtyard Reference Images (4). https://www.pinterest.com/donglmm/ancient-roman-courtyard-house/ https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ancient-art-civilizations/roman/x7e914f5b:beginner-guides-to-roman-architecture/a/roman-domestic-architecture-domus https://www.architectmagazine.com/project-gallery/the-open-courtyard_o https://www.augustaraurica.ch/en/visit


Page 57. Historical Map Image. https://www.discusmedia.com/maps/swiss_city_maps/3330/ Page 58-59. Building Code. International Building Code 2022. Page 60. Farnese Plan. Page 62. Utzon Plan. Page 64. Aires Mateus Plan. Page 66. Barrozzi Viega Plan. Page 68. Tomihiro Plan. Page 70. Hejduk Plan. Page 74. Architectural Works. Tomihiro Plan. https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/w1gujxim/release/3 Page 76. Architectural Works. Tomihiro Plan. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41757198 Page 78. Reference Images (4). https://www.augustaraurica.ch/en/visit https://www.pinterest.com/pin/10414642863561966/ https://www.archdaily.com/890010/15-incredible-architectural-works-in-the-mountains Page 80. Reference Images (4). https://www.dezeen.com/2022/01/23/ten-homes-bright-interior-courtyards-lookbooks/ Page 82. Repetitive Plan References (4). https://www.archdaily.com/897774/school-architecture-70-examples-in-plan-and-section/5b3fcc62f197cc5306000051-school-architecture-70-examples-in-plan-and-section-photo?ad_source=myarchdaily&ad_ medium=bookmark-show&ad_content=current-user Page 84. Reference Images (4). https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/12/t-magazine/lost-in-translation.html https://www.archdaily.com/798961/40-impressive-details-using-concrete https://www.slideshare.net/swapnika15/passive-coolingtechniques Solar Heat Gain Diagram by Greg Madden. Page 88. Reference Images (2). https://www.archdaily.com/885229/eduardo-souto-de-moura-i-look-beyond-solution-i-look-for-an-expression https://www.archdaily.com/897774/school-architecture-70-examples-in-plan-and-section/5b3fcc62f197cc5306000051-school-architecture-70-examples-in-plan-and-section-photo?ad_source=myarchdaily&ad_ medium=bookmark-show&ad_content=current-user Page 90. Reference Images (2). https://my.archdaily.com/us/@amanda-thisdale/folders/comp-studio/bookmarks/34444322 https://www.archdaily.com/897774/school-architecture-70-examples-in-plan-and-section/5b3fcc62f197cc5306000051-school-architecture-70-examples-in-plan-and-section-photo?ad_source=myarchdaily&ad_ medium=bookmark-show&ad_content=current-user Page 96. Reference Images (6). https://www.dezeen.com/2019/04/09/bernardo-bader-architekten-schruns-austria-alpin-sport-ski-resort/ https://www.dezeen.com/2019/11/19/new-photographs-herzog-de-meuron-dominus-winery/ https://www.archdaily.com/798961/40-impressive-details-using-concrete https://www.2226.eu/en/implementation/projekte-details/2226-lustenau-1/ Page 102. Reference Images (7). https://divisare.com/projects/271585-barozzi-veiga-simon-menges-philharmonic-hall-szczecin https://www.carmodygroarke.com/hill-house/ https://www.wallpaper.com/architecture/studio-east-pavilion-by-carmody-groarke-london https://www.urdesignmag.com/architecture/2020/06/02/lasvit-headquarters-novy-bor-czech-republic-ov-a/ Page 108. Reference Images (7). https://www.dezeen.com/2016/05/12/louis-kahn-yale-centre-british-art-architecture-interior-reopens-restoration-usa/


https://socks-studio.com/2014/03/03/i-do-not-draw-plans-facades-or-sections-adolf-loos-and-the-villa-muller/ https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/reborn-mies-van-der-rohes-villa-tugendhat-in-brno-czech-republic https://www.archdaily.com/206771/la-coruna-center-for-the-arts-aceboxalonso-studio https://www.archdaily.com/935423/how-were-the-walls-of-roman-buildings-constructed https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/ancient-roman-concrete-stands-test-time https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/researchers-discover-secret-recipe-roman-concrete-020141 Page 110. Reference Images (7). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villa_Savoye https://www.filt3rs.net/case/villa-tugendhat-mies-van-der-rohe-483 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalet Page 112. Reference Images (7). https://www.metalocus.es/en/news/solo-office-office-kgdvs-circular-house-disappears-forest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/186688347027027191/ https://www.hellotravel.com/switzerland/old-town-basel https://roma-bella.com/construction-techniques-in-the-roman-world/ https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-de-rehabilitacion-rehab-basilea-10 Page 132. Active Systems References (7). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocaust https://www.energyscope.ch/en/questions/how-is-heating-provided-in-switzerland-today/ Page 133. Radiant Flooring Image. https://www.rehau.com/us-en/radiant-heating Page 134. Reference Images (7). https://www.archiexpo.com/prod/longobardi-porfidi/product-167288-2248945.html https://www.archdaily.com/799874/christ-and-gantenbeins-kunstmuseum-basel-photographed-by-laurian-ghinitiou https://www.skylandsenergy.com/ductless-heating-cooling/concealed-duct-mini-split https://www.seedengr.com/Variable%20Refrigerant%20Flow%20Systems.pdf https://id.pinterest.com/herrylim28/house-air-circulation/ Page 135. Radiant Flooring Diagram. https://www.highcardheating.com/pages/radiant-heat-for-concrete-slab-on-grade Page 136. Reference Images (7). https://www.dezeen.com/2016/12/15/solid-concrete-gallery-as-living-artwork-studio-atrium-aswa-bangkok-thailand/ Page 148. Basel Reference Images (7). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince-Bishopric_of_Basel https://www.hellotravel.com/switzerland/old-town-basel https://segd.org/kunstmuseum-basel-light-frieze Page 150. Augusta Raurica Reference Images (4). https://m.facebook.com/AugustaRaurica/photos/a.10150614978656175/10157329907786175/?comment_id=10157331905366175 https://www.augustaraurica.ch/en/support/history Page 152. Reference Images (7). https://www.archdaily.com/885229/eduardo-souto-de-moura-i-look-beyond-solution-i-look-for-an-expression https://www.archdaily.com/371521/antinori-winery-archea-associati https://www.designboom.com/architecture/snohetta-theodore-roosevelt-presidential-library-north-dakota-08-20-2020/ https://segd.org/kunstmuseum-basel-light-frieze https://smarthistory.org/roman-domestic-architecture-insula/ Page 154. Reference Images (7). https://www.metalocus.es/en/news/solo-office-office-kgdvs-circular-house-disappears-forest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/186688347027027191/ https://www.hellotravel.com/switzerland/old-town-basel https://roma-bella.com/construction-techniques-in-the-roman-world/ https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-de-rehabilitacion-rehab-basilea-10


Page 156. Reference Images (7). Tomihiro Plan. https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-de-rehabilitacion-rehab-basilea-10 https://www.encirclephotos.com/gallery/basel-switzerland/ https://www.pinterest.com/donglmm/ancient-roman-courtyard-house/ Page 160. Reference Images (4). https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/edificio-en-el-campus-novartis-3 Page 176. Reference Images (7). https://roma-bella.com/construction-techniques-in-the-roman-world/ https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-de-rehabilitacion-rehab-basilea-10 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061820338046 https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0002350 Page 192. Reference Images (7). https://www.archiexpo.com/prod/longobardi-porfidi/product-167288-2248945.html https://www.archdaily.com/799874/christ-and-gantenbeins-kunstmuseum-basel-photographed-by-laurian-ghinitiou https://www.skylandsenergy.com/ductless-heating-cooling/concealed-duct-mini-split https://www.seedengr.com/Variable%20Refrigerant%20Flow%20Systems.pdf https://id.pinterest.com/herrylim28/house-air-circulation/ https://lbb.in/bangalore/tasveer-gallery-b47cc3/ https://www.dickinson.edu/info/20093/archaeology/1884/archaeology_labs/2 https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/arches/Wiki.jsp?page=State%20Office%20for%20Heritage%20Management%20and%20Archaeology%20Saxony-Anhalt%20-%20State%20Museum%20of%20prehistory%20-%20 Halle%20%28Saale%29%2C%20Germany Page 206. Reference Images (7). https://divisare.com/projects/271585-barozzi-veiga-simon-menges-philharmonic-hall-szczecin https://www.designcurial.com/news/hill-house-box-by-carmody-groarke-7357219/ https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/ancient-roman-concrete-stands-test-time https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Novartis-Campus-Forum-3-Basel_Photo-copyright-Christian-Richters.jpg https://www.encirclephotos.com/image/rathaus-town-hall-in-basel-switzerland/ Page 214. Basel Reference Images (7). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince-Bishopric_of_Basel https://www.hellotravel.com/switzerland/old-town-basel https://segd.org/kunstmuseum-basel-light-frieze Page 216. Augusta Raurica Reference Images (3). https://m.facebook.com/AugustaRaurica/photos/a.10150614978656175/10157329907786175/?comment_id=10157331905366175 https://www.augustaraurica.ch/en/support/history Page 218. Reference Images (7). https://www.archdaily.com/885229/eduardo-souto-de-moura-i-look-beyond-solution-i-look-for-an-expression https://www.archdaily.com/371521/antinori-winery-archea-associati https://www.designboom.com/architecture/snohetta-theodore-roosevelt-presidential-library-north-dakota-08-20-2020/ https://segd.org/kunstmuseum-basel-light-frieze https://smarthistory.org/roman-domestic-architecture-insula/ Page 220. Reference Images (7). https://www.metalocus.es/en/news/solo-office-office-kgdvs-circular-house-disappears-forest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/186688347027027191/ https://www.hellotravel.com/switzerland/old-town-basel https://roma-bella.com/construction-techniques-in-the-roman-world/ https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-de-rehabilitacion-rehab-basilea-10 Page 222. Reference Images (7). Tomihiro Plan. https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-de-rehabilitacion-rehab-basilea-10


Page 222. Reference Images (7). https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/centro-de-rehabilitacion-rehab-basilea-10 https://www.encirclephotos.com/gallery/basel-switzerland/ https://www.pinterest.com/donglmm/ancient-roman-courtyard-house/ Page 226. Reference Images (4). https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/edificio-en-el-campus-novartis-3


BLACK AND WHITE SET



AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY AUGST, SWITZERLAND SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET SHEET NUMBER A0-00 A0-01 A0-02 A0-03 A0-04 A0-05 A0-06 A0-07

SHEET NAME FRONT COVER CODE ANALYSIS OCCUPANCY LOADS EGRESS PLANS FIXTURES SITE PLAN SITE PLAN - IMMEDIATE BUILDING VIEWS

A1-01 A1-02 A1-03 A1-04

BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN MEZZANINE PLAN ROOF PLAN

A2-01 A2-02 A2-03

ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS SECTIONS

A3-03 A3-02

WALL COMPOSITE ASSEMBLY AXONOMETRIC

S0-01

STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE

S1-01 S1-02 S1-03 S1-04

FOUNDATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN MEZZANINE PLAN ROOF PLAN

S2-01

STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC

M0-01

MECHANICAL NARRATIVE

M1-01 M1-02 M1-03 M1-04

RADIANT FLOORING PLAN RADIANT WALL PLAN VENTILATION PLAN DRAINAGE PLAN

M2-01

MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC


area net

area gross

category (assembly..)

subcategory (A3, A4, B1,..)

coeff. Factor (feet) net/gross

# of occp.

coeff. of egress. (in) in of egress

3000

4800 Assembly

A3

15 net

200.0

0.3

60

250

75

100

100 1 per 125

0.8 1 per 65

1.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.536 1 per 500

0.4

Artifacts gallery

2000

3200 Assembly

A3

30 net

66.7

0.3

20

250

75

33.33333333

33.33333333 1 per 125

0.2666666667 1 per 65

0.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1786666667 1 per 500

0.1333333333

cloakroom

300

480 Assembly

A3

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

250

75

0.8

0.8 1 per 125

0.0064 1 per 65

0.01 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.004288 1 per 500

0.0032

Cafeteria/kitchennette

500

800 Assembly

A2

200 gross

4.0

0.3

1.2

250

75

2

IT control room

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

Common office/lounge

600

960 Assembly

A-3

15 net

40.0

0.3

12

250

75

20

20 1 per 125

Director's office

150

240 Business

B

100 net

1.5

0.3

0.45

300

100

0.75

0.75 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.015 1 per 100

0.015

meeting rooms

400

640 Business

B

15 net

26.7

0.3

8

300

100

13.33333333

13.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.2666666667 1 per 100

0.2666666667

0.3

18

300

100

30

2 1 per 40

30 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.4 1 per 65

0.05 1 per 40 0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.16 1 per 65

1.2 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

water fountain total water fountains

Multi-purpose room

60.0

50 1 per 125

total urinals

100.0

50 net

50

total toilets (fem) urinals

5 net

B

75

total toilets (m) Toilet (fem)

A3

4800 Business

250

Toilet (m)

800 Assembly

3000

30

female

500

Laboratory

0.3

trav. Dist. (feet) common path of travel (ft) male

Info cente/reception

0.268 1 per 500

0.2

0.05 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.0335 1 per 500

0.008

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

0.3076923077 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1072 1 per 500

1.2 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.6 1 per 100

0.08

0.6

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

8000

12800 Business

B

300 gross

42.7

0.3

12.8

300

100

21.33333333

21.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.4266666667 1 per 100

0.4266666667

IT room

400

640 Business

B

300 gross

2.1

0.3

0.64

300

100

1.066666667

0.04266666667 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02133333333 1 per 100

0.02133333333

Waste room/recycling

200

320 Factory

F-1

300 gross

1.1

0.3

0.32

250

100

0.5333333333

0.005333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.002666666667 1 per 400

0.002666666667

Equipment room

600

960 Business

B

300 gross

3.2

0.3

0.96

300

100

1.6

1.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.032 1 per 100

0.032

Locker room/changing area

600

960 Business

B

50 gross

19.2

0.3

5.76

300

100

9.6

9.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.192 1 per 100

0.192

Laundry room

250

400 Factory

F-1

50 gross

8.0

0.3

2.4

250

100

4

0.04 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02 1 per 400

0.02

Vault Storage module

Totals:

21100

33760

579.9

173.97

289.95

1.066666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.5333333333 1 per 100

4 1 per 100 289.95

0.04266666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.005333333333 1 per 100

0.04 1 per 100 5

6

2.7

2.4



coeff. Factor (feet) net/gross

# of occp.

EGRESS REQUIRED: 173.97” trav. Dist. (feet) common path of travel (ft) male female Toilet (m)

coeff. of egress. (in) in of egress

total toilets (m) Toilet (fem)

TOTAL EGRESS PROVIDED: 384” 50 50 1 per 125

total toilets (fem) urinals

water fountain total water fountains

total urinals

5 net

100.0

0.3

30

250

75

0.4 1 per 65

0.8 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.268 1 per 500

0.2

15 net

200.0

0.3

60

250

75

100

100 1 per 125

0.8 1 per 65

1.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.536 1 per 500

0.4

30 net

66.7

0.3

20

250

75

33.33333333

33.33333333 1 per 125

0.2666666667 1 per 65

0.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1786666667 1 per 500

0.1333333333

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

250

75

0.8

0.8 1 per 125

0.0064 1 per 65

0.01 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.004288 1 per 500

0.0032

200 gross

4.0

0.3

1.2

250

75

2

0.05 1 per 40

0.05 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.0335 1 per 500

0.008

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.016

15 net

40.0

0.3

12

250

75

20

20 1 per 125

100 net

1.5

0.3

0.45

300

100

0.75

0.75 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

13.33333333

13.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

2 1 per 40

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.3076923077 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1072 1 per 500

0.08

0.03 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.015 1 per 100

0.015

0.5333333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.2666666667 1 per 100

0.2666666667

0.16 1 per 65

15 net

26.7

0.3

8

300

100

50 net

60.0

0.3

18

300

100

30

30 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.6 1 per 100

0.6

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

300 gross

42.7

0.3

12.8

300

100

300 gross

2.1

0.3

0.64

300

100

1.066666667

300 gross

1.1

0.3

0.32

250

100

0.5333333333

300 gross

3.2

0.3

0.96

300

100

1.6

1.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

50 gross

19.2

0.3

5.76

300

100

9.6

9.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

50 gross

8.0

0.3

2.4

250

100

4

173.97

579.9

21.33333333

21.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 1.066666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.5333333333 1 per 100

289.95

0.8533333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.04266666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

4 1 per 100

0.8533333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.4266666667

0.02133333333 1 per 100

0.02133333333

0.002666666667 1 per 400

0.002666666667

0.064 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.032 1 per 100

0.032

0.384 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.192 1 per 100

0.192

0.04 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02 1 per 400

0.02

0.04 1 per 100

289.95

0.4266666667 1 per 100

0.04266666667 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets 0.005333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.005333333333 1 per 100

5

6

2.7

2.4

Width: 48”

112’-0”

51’-0”

Width: 48”

38’6”

70’-0”

126’-0”

94’-0”

26’-0”

133’-0”

60’-0”

230’-0”

119’-0”

182’-0”

77’-0”

120’-0”

Width: 48”

Width: 48”

88’-0”

Width: 48”

100’-0”90’-0”

30’-0”

114’-0”

Width: 96”

41’-0”

82’0”

56’-0”

Width: 48”

76’-0”


area net

area gross

category (assembly..)

subcategory (A3, A4, B1,..)

coeff. Factor (feet) net/gross

# of occp.

coeff. of egress. (in) in of egress

3000

4800 Assembly

A3

15 net

200.0

0.3

60

250

75

100

100 1 per 125

0.8 1 per 65

1.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.536 1 per 500

0.4

2000

3200 Assembly

A3

30 net

66.7

0.3

20

250

75

33.33333333

33.33333333 1 per 125

0.2666666667 1 per 65

0.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1786666667 1 per 500

0.1333333333

300

480 Assembly

A3

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.0032

500

800 Assembly

A2

200 gross

4.0

0.3

1.2

250

75

2

0.004288 9'-11" 1 per 500

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

600

960 Assembly

A-3

15 net

40.0

0.3

12

250

75

20

20 1 per 125

150

240 Business

B

100 net

1.5

0.3

0.45

300

100

0.75

0.75 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

13.33333333

13.33333333 1 per 25 for FINISH first - 50, 1 per 50 after

6'-0" 0.8

5'-11" 15'-1" 0.8 1 per 125

8'-7"

12'-10"

13'-1" 0.0064 12'-10" per 65 6'-8"

2 1 per 40

11'-2"

4'-0" 8'-1"

0.05 1 per 40

12'-8" 0.01

0.268 1 per 500

23'-3" should not substitute more than 67% of water closets 21'-6"

0.0335 1 per 500

0.008

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

0.3076923077 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1072 1 per 500

0.08

0.03 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.015 1 per 100

0.015

0.5333333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.2666666667 1 per 100

0.2666666667

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.16 1 per 65

0.05 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.2

400

640 Business

B

15 net

26.7

0.3

8

300

100

3000

4800 Business

B

50 net

60.0

0.3

18

300

100

30

30 1 per 25 for - SEEfirst A3.01 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.6 1 per 100

0.6

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

8000

12800 Business

B

300 gross

42.7

400

640 Business

B

300 gross

200

320 Factory

F-1

300 gross

600

960 Business

B

300 gross

600

960 Business

B

50 gross

250

400 Factory

F-1

50 gross

8.0

300

100

0.64

300

100

1.066666667

0.3

0.32

250

100

0.5333333333

3.2

0.3

0.96

300

100

1.6

1.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

19.2

0.3

5.76

300

100

9.6

9.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.3

2.4

250

100

4

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

16'-6"

12.8

0.3

1.1

579.9

289.95

173.97

1.066666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.5333333333 1 per 100

4 1 per 100 289.95

0.8533333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.04266666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

0.8533333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.4266666667 1 per 100

0.4266666667

0.04266666667 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02133333333 1 per 100

0.02133333333

0.005333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.002666666667 1 per 400

0.002666666667

0.064 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.032 1 per 100

0.032

0.384 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.192 1 per 100

0.192

0.04 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02 1 per 400

0.02

0.005333333333 1 per 100

0.04 1 per 100 5

6

2.7

2.4

13'-3"

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

6'-8"

15'-0"

33760

21.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.3

2.1

22'-10"

21100

21.33333333

CORRUGATED METAL

21'-7"

ing area

14'-0" 75

0.8 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

N

ing

15'-5"

0.4 1 per 65

water fountain total water fountains

m

250

50 1 per 125

total urinals

100.0

9'-3"

50

total toilets (fem) urinals

5 net

0.48

75

total toilets (m) Toilet (fem)

A3

11'-5"

250

Toilet (m)

800 Assembly

ette

30

female

500

unge

0.3

trav. Dist. (feet) common path of travel (ft) male

n

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FIXTURE COUNTS

A0-04


BATHROOM DIAMETER M1.02 - 6" - SEE STACK (TYP.) VENT

- SEE CORRUGATED

FINISH METAL A3.01

0'

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

100'

300'

500'

AMANDA THISDALE

N

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1:100 DATE :

05/22/2022

SITE PLAN

A0-05


AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/32" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

SITE PLAN

A0-06

- SEE D E2 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

- SEE D E1 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

ER

- SEE D B1 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

UST

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

- SEE D A2 M1.01

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

AIN

WALL

H AIR FRES M1.03 SEE

UST

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 UST SEE

-

EXHA

.) (TYP PIPE M1.04 NAGE - SEE

DRAI

FRES

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

BEAM ER S1.04 Y TIMB 2 - SEE HEAV - 12X1

FRES

ER Y TIMB 2 - SEE HEAV - 12X1 S1.02 MN

UST

EXHA

COLU

E CRET 2" CON CAST H WALL SITE FINIS

-

LOUV UST 3 EXHA ER SEE M1.0

LOUV

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

EXHA

ION

L MULL STEE 4"X5"

- 0'-3"

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

CURT

Y MALL D THER VATE G ACTI LATIN INSU E LOAD CRET - SEE CON WALL S1.02 ING

BEAR

EXHA

FRES

IFOL

MAN

- SEE D A1 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

R DOO E ANCE OSUR .) TENT (TYP ENCL MAIN 2'-4" FOR

- SEE D F2 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

.) 4

(TYP UT NSPO SEE M1.0

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

DOW

FRES

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

NEW

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

UST

EXHA

FRES

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

RS

K PAVE

S TING PLAN (TYP.)

.)

(TYP

BRIC

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

- SEE D E3 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

FRES

FRES

- SEE D C1 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

ER

-

UST

LOUV UST EXHAM1.03 SEE

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

FRES

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

- SEE D E1 M1.01

FRES

IFOL

MAN

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

SS

FRES

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

3'-9" R.) (TYP

FRES

DOO

EGRE

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

UST

EXHA

- SEE D E4 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

E CRET CON SOIL K IN FOR RD BREA SLAB RTYA IN COU WITH

FRES

- SEE D D1 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

- SEE D A3 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

FRES

- SEE D E5 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

FRES

FRES

G LATIN INSU ITION E PART - 0'-6" CRET WALL

CON

ER

H AIR FRES M1.03 SEE

- SEE D F3 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

-

LOUV

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

FRES

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

UST

EXHA

UST

EXHA

BB

A2-06

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

FRES

UST

EXHA

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE

ER 3 LOUV H AIR SEE M1.0

FRES

- SEE D D3 M1.01

IFOL

MAN

- SEE D D2 M1.01

IFOL

UST

EXHA

MAN

ER 3 LOUV M1.0 SEE



1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

SOUTH A2-01

A

A.H.U - SEE M1.01

16'-6"

HEAT PUMP (TYP.) SEE M1.01 HEAT PUMP (TYP.) SEE M1.01

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

FOUNDATION WALL (TYP.) - SEE S1.01

E.R.V UNIT (TYP.) SEE M1.01

15'-0"

E

CONCRETE COLUMN (TYP.) - SEE S1.01

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

I J K L

MECHANICAL 001

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

M

N O P

15'-4"

E.R.V UNIT (TYP.) SEE M1.01

WEST A2-02

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

EAST A2-01

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

NORTH A2-02

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

BASEMENT PLAN

A1-01


1

4

3

2

11'-5"

15'-5"

9'-3"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

8

5'-11"

15'-1"

9

8'-7"

12

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

16

14 15

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

17

23'-3"

21'-6"

AA A2-03

20

19

9'-11"

SOUTH A2-01

MAINTENTANCE DOOR FOR ENCLOSURE 2'-4" (TYP.)

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

16'-6"

MANIFOLD F2 - SEE A M1.01

MANIFOLD A1 - SEE M1.01

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE LOAD BEARING WALL - SEE S1.02

MANIFOLD B1 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD A2 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD E1 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD E2 - SEE M1.01

CURTAIN WALL - 0'-3" JANITORSCLOS. HEAVY TIMBER BEAM - 12X12 - SEE S1.04

SITECAST CONCRETE FINISH WALL - 2" EQUIPMENT 101

FRESH AIR 114LOUVER SEE M1.03

STEEL MULLION 4"X5"

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

FRESH AIR LOUVER -EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03 SEE M1.03

MEETING

MEETING

116

117

DRAINAGE PIPE (TYP.) - SEE M1.04 HEAVY TIMBER COLUMN - 12X12 - SEE S1.02 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03 MULTIPURPOSE 108

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

MANIFOLD C1 - SEE M1.01

E

15'-0"

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

COMMONOFF. 115

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

CLOAKROOM 102

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

F

6'-8"

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

J K L

RECEPTION

113

103

NEW PLANTINGS (TYP.)

MANIFOLD E1 - SEE M1.01 ELECTRICAL

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

112

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

GALLERY 109

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

MANIFOLD E3 - SEE M1.01

VAULT

120

121

P

BB

A2-03

122

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

WEST A2-02

15'-4"

BREAK IN CONCRETE SLAB FOR SOIL WITHIN COURTYARD FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

CAFE

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

O

STORAGE

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

M

N

BRICK PAVERS (TYP.)

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03 LAB

EAST A2-01

DOWNSPOUT (TYP.) SEE M1.04

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

IT

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

I

119

LOCKERROOM 118

EGRESS DOOR - 3'-9" (TYP.)

H

DIRECTOR'SOFF.

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

10'-4"

G

104 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

JANITORSCLOS. 111 MANIFOLD D1 - SEE MANIFOLD A3 - SEE M1.01 M1.01

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

INSULATING CONCRETE PARTITION WALL - 0'-6"

13'-3"

Q MANIFOLD F3 - SEE M1.01

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03 WASTE/RECYCLING EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

R

105 MANIFOLD E4 - SEE M1.01 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

22'-10"

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

LAB 110

123

LAUNDRY EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

106

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

S

STORAGE

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

MANIFOLD E5 - SEE M1.01

IT

21'-7"

107

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

T

MANIFOLD D2 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD D3 - SEE M1.01

NORTH A2-02

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

A1-02

AUGUSTA R


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

8

5'-11"

15'-1"

9

8'-7"

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

16

14 15

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

17

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

AA

9'-11"

A2-03 SOUTH A2-01

MANIFOLD B1 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD E2 - SEE M1.01

A

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

16'-6"

CURTAIN WALL - 0'-3" (TYP.)

JANITORSCLOS. 114

HEAVY TIMBER BEAM - 12X12 - SEE S1.04

EQUIPMENT 101

SITECAST CONCRETE FINISH WALL - 2" (TYP.)

MEETING

STEEL MULLION 4"X5"

MEETING

116

117

HEAVY TIMBER COLUMN - 12X12 - SEE S1.02

MULTIPURPOSE 108

COMMONOFF.

E

15'-0"

115

CLOAKROOM 102

F

6'-8" 10'-4"

G

I J K L

113

103

O P

BB

A2-03

15'-4" 11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

N

DOWNSPOUT (TYP.) SEE M1.04

IT

RECEPTION

ELECTRICAL 112

GALLERY 109

LAB

VAULT

120

121

STORAGE 122

BELOW (TYP.)

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE LOADBEARING WALL SEE S1.03

M EAST A2-01

119

118

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

DIRECTOR'SOFF. LOCKERROOM

WEST A2-02 SITECAST CONCRETE RAILING - 3'-6" X 6"

CAFE 104

SITECAST CONCRETE SLAB - 0'-10" - SEE S1.03

Q

13'-3"

MEZZANINE 50

WASTE/RECYCLING 105

R LAB

STORAGE

22'-10"

110

123

LAUNDRY 106

S

21'-7"

IT 107

T

NORTH

N

A2-02

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN

A1-03


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

SOUTH A2-01

FINISH CORRUGATED METAL - SEE A3.01

16'-6"

A

C D

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

B

15'-0"

E

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

M

WEST

EAST

N O P

15'-4"

A2-02

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

A2-01

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

NORTH A2-02

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

ROOF PLAN

A1-04


A

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

O

N

Q

P

S

R

T

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

C

B

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01 ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02

ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

NEW PLANTING (TYP.) SEE A1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0" LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

EAST ELEVATION

1

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

Xref .\FL-BSMT.dwg

EAST A2-01

3

2

4

5

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

6

7

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

8

9

10

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

11

12

13

14 15

16

17

18

19

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CONCRETE FINISH WALL - SEE A1.02 B.O.ROOF 020'-0" ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01 T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02 LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

NORTH A2-02

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

NORTH ELEVATION

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

ELEVATIONS

A2.01


T

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

Q

R

S

P

O

N

M

L

K

J

I

H

G

E

F

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

D

B

C

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

A

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CONCRETE FINISH WALL - SEE A1.02 ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0" LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

WEST A2-02

WEST ELEVATION

19

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

CONCRETE FINISH WALL - SEE A1.02

B.O.ROOF 020'-0" ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

8

7

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

6

5

4

3

2

1

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

SOUTH A2-01

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

SOUTH ELEVATION

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

ELEVATIONS

A2.02


A

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

B

C

D

E

G

F

H

J

I

K

L

M

N

O

Q

P

S

R

T

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

ROOF ENCLOSURE (TYP.) - SEE A3.01 SOUTHEN PINE GLULAM GIRDER - SEE S1.04 SOUTHEN PINE GLULAM GIRDER - SEE S1.04 ENCLOSURE SYSTEM - SEE A3.01

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

MULTIPURPOSE 108

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.)

RADIANT WALL SYSTEM - SEE M1.02

AHU FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - SEE A1.02

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING LOADBEARING CONCRETE WALL SEE S1.02

SITECAST CONCRETE RAILING - SEE A1.03 CONCRETE SLAB S1.03

GALLERY

110

THERMALLY ACTIVATED CONCRETE SLAB ERV EXHAUST DUCT - SEE M1.01 AND S1.02 SEE M1.03 ERV EXHAUST DUCT SEE M1.03

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03 ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

LABORATORY

109

BRICK PAVERS - SEE A1.02

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

FERTILE SOIL DEHYDRATED GEOCOMPOSITES TAR BASE SCREED

T.O.FOOTING -010'-6" B.O.FOOTING -0013'-6" GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE PIPE - SEE M1.01

AA A2-03

SECTION AA

1

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

4

3

2

RADIANT WALL SYSTEM - SEE M1.02

SOUTHEN PINE GLULAM GIRDER - SEE S1.04 THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING LOADBEARING CONCRETE WALL SEE S1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

CAFE 104 T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 15

16

17

18

19

20

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

ROOF ENCLOSURE (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

5

FERTILE SOIL

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

TAR BASE DEHYDRATED GEOCOMPOSITES SCREED

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.)

ENCLOSURE SYSTEM - SEE A3.01 CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - SEE A1.02

CONCRETE SLAB S1.03

GALLERY

STORAGE

LABORATORY

109 THERMALLY ACTIVATED CONCRETE SLAB SEE M1.01 AND S1.02

122

120 ERV EXHAUST DUCTSEE M1.03

RADIANT FLOORING MANIFOLD - SEE M1.01

ERV EXHUAST DUCT SEE M1.03

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE PIPE - SEE M1.01

ERV EXHUAST DUCT SEE M1.03

T.O.FOOTING -010'-6" B.O.FOOTING -0013'-6"

BB A2-03

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

SECTION BB

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

SECTIONS

A2.03


A

B

A

LEGEND 1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING 8’X3’ 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - 3’-0” 3. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 4” 4. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 6” 5. GRAVEL - 6” 6. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB - 10” 7. SCREED - 4” 8. GEOTHERMAL RADIANT FLOORING 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH TILE FLOORING WITH 1/4” MORTAR- 3/16” 10. CAST-IN-PLACE LOAD-BEARING THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE WALL - 2-6” 11. RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM 12. ALUMINUM TUBE - 2” 13. ALUMINUM MAINTENANCE GRATE - 2” DEEP 14. LED STRIP LIGHTING 15. LOW-E TERRA-COTTA TINTED GLASS PANELS 16. TERRA-COTTA TINTED ALUMINUM FIN - 1’-0” DEEP 17. INSECT SCREEN 18. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM 16”X36” 19. SOUTHERN PINE CLT PANEL 10’X40’X3.5” 20. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH - 2” 21. ALUMINUM ROOF FLASHING 22. GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE PLATE 23. DRAINAGE PIPE 24. STEEL TUBE FRAMING 25. MAINTENANCE LADDER 26. ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM

5'-6" 3

20

21 19 26

18 22

6'-3"

17

16

11

15

12

12

14

13

24

25 10

7

8

9

3 5

6

2 4

3 5

6

1

23

ELEVATION

SECTION

A

PLAN

AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/2" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/04/2022

ASSEMBLY COMPOSITE

A3-01


LEGEND

20 19

3

21 18 26

4

16 15

14

13 12 24

10

7

8

9

3

6

5

4 2

6

5

3 5 1

23

1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING 8’X3’ 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - 3’-0” 3. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 4” 4. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 6” 5. GRAVEL - 6” 6. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB - 10” 7. SCREED - 4” 8. GEOTHERMAL RADIANT FLOORING 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH TILE FLOORING WITH 1/4” MORTAR- 3/16” 10. CAST-IN-PLACE LOAD-BEARING THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE WALL - 2-6” 11. RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM 12. ALUMINUM TUBE - 2” 13. ALUMINUM MAINTENANCE GRATE - 2” DEEP 14. LED STRIP LIGHTING 15. LOW-E TERRA-COTTA TINTED GLASS PANELS 16. TERRA-COTTA TINTED ALUMINUM FIN - 1’-0” DEEP 17. INSECT SCREEN 18. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM 16”X36” 19. SOUTHERN PINE CLT PANEL 10’X40’X3.5” 20. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH - 2” 21. ALUMINUM ROOF FLASHING 22. GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE PLATE 23. DRAINAGE PIPE 24. STEEL TUBE FRAMING 25. MAINTENANCE LADDER 26. ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM


STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE

16'-6"

Almost all of the areas of the building utilize concrete load bearing walls. The load bearing walls distinguish program space from program space, which therefore reinforces the cellular nature of the plan. The transition 1 spaces, such as the informal courtyards and anterooms are treated with concrete partition walls. This creates the uniformity of materiality to connect the spaces, but the difference in wall thickness separates these dif- 11'-5" ferent functional spaces. The separation in structure occurs at the formal courtyards. These elements are light and bring in air, so they are treated separately from the heavy structural elements of the loadbearing concrete. The curtain walls that surround the courtyard spaces are supported by heavy timber columns and beams. This relates back to the site’s greater context of Switzerland, where wood is an abundant resource. This creates A moments of relief from the heavy concrete structural system. The exposed structure creates an interior relationship that can be glanced at from the exterior through the glass of the courtyards, but creates a hermetic interior experience of discovering different programmatic spaces through little separation of materiality of the structural system. B

9'-3"

15'-5"

4'-0"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

9

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

2'-10" 6'-8"

5'-0" 4'-0"

5'-0"

13

14 15

17

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

5'-0"

16

5'-0"

23'-3"

21'-6"

5'-0"

23'-6"

18'-0" TYP.

5'-0"

9'-11"

4'-0"

5'-0"

8'-0" TYP.

18'-0" TYP.

6'-0" 36'-8" 5'-0"

9'-7"

8'-0" TYP.

2'-6"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

2'-6"

4'-0"

I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

6'-8"

15'-0"

5'-0"

20

19

4'-0"

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

The structure of the building relates to the sustainable agenda for this project through utilizing strategies that lower concrete’s Ccarbon footprint. While concrete’s carbon footprint is relatively low, it has a high embodied D energy. Initially, the building is designed for expansion, rather than demolition then new construction, so the risk of releasing the embodied carbon is lower. Secondly, thermally insulated concrete Eis achieved through the use of perlite and bio-aggregates. Bio-aggregates have a relatively high thermally-insulating value, and are made from organic materials. The high insulating value of the structural system reduces the need for extra artificial insulation, and promotes high thermal F heating and mass, which reduces the need for mechanically-assisted cooling systems. The heavy timber aspect of the project also utilizes organic materials, and an abundant natural resource forGthe local region. Wood has a low carbon footprint, and low embodied carbon. The restrained use of heavy timber throughout the building is conscious towards deforestation and looks to explore other sustainable structure 8'-0" H methods through expanding and altering classing loadbearing concrete construction.

4

3

2

15'-4" P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

O

4'-0"

4'-0" 56'-6"

4'-0"

5'-11"

5'-0"

5'-6"

5'-0"

6'-0"

23'-6"

M

N

12'-6"

5'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

8'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

34'-2"

5'-6"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0" 12'-6"

4'-0"

6'-6"

4'-0"

13'-3"

Q

9'-0"

5'-0"

10'-10"

10'-2"

46'-8"

4'-0"

5'-0" 36'-4"

10'-2"

R

22'-10"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

36'-5"

59'-6"

S

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

21'-7"

5'-0"

5'-0"

T

12'-6"

9'-10" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE

S0-01


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

18

12'-8"

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

A

16'-6"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL 1'-0"

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL 3'-0" (TYP.)

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE STRIP FOOTING - 8'-0" (TYP.)

E

15'-0"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE STRIP FOOTING - 3'-0"

10'-4"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS - 2'X2' (TYP.)

I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

PERFORATION IN STRUCTURE FOR DUCTWORK (TYP.)

1'-0" (TYP.)

G

6'-8"

F

N O

3'-0" TYP.

4'-0"

P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FOUNDATION STRUCTURE

S1-01


1

11'-5"

16'-6"

A

9'-3"

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 18" (TYP.)

4'-0"

D

15'-0"

E

6'-0"

14'-0"

7

6

15'-1"

8

9

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

14 15

5'-0"

16

17

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

2'-10" 6'-8"

5'-0" 4'-0"

5'-0"

13

5'-0"

SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM COLUMN 12"X12" (TYP.)

5'-0"

21'-6"

5'-0"

6'-0" 5'-0" PERFORATION FOR

9'-11"

4'-0"

5'-0"

8'-0" TYP.

18'-0" TYP.

SITECAST TWO-WAY CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB - 10"

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 36" (TYP.)

9'-7"

8'-0" TYP.

2'-6"

36'-8" 5'-0"

20

19

23'-3"

23'-6"

18'-0" TYP.

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

C

15'-5"

5

4'-0"

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING SITECAST CONCRETE WALL - 2'-6" (TYP.)

B

4

3

2

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

2'-6"

LOUVER - 12" X 24" (TYP.)

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 12" (TYP.)

F

H I J K L

6'-8"

4'-0"

15'-4" P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

N

4'-0"

4'-0" 56'-6"

4'-0"

5'-11"

5'-0"

5'-6"

5'-0"

6'-0"

23'-6"

M

O

12'-6"

8'-0"

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

5'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

8'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

34'-2"

5'-6"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0" 12'-6"

4'-0"

6'-6"

4'-0"

13'-3"

Q

9'-0"

5'-0"

10'-10"

10'-2"

46'-8"

4'-0"

5'-0" 36'-4"

10'-2"

R

22'-10"

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 24" (TYP.)

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

36'-5"

59'-6"

S

4'-0"

5'-0" PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 24" (TYP.)

5'-0"

5'-0"

21'-7"

5'-0"

T

12'-6"

9'-10" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

S1-02


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

7

6

6'-0"

14'-0"

15'-1"

8

9

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

13

2'-10" 6'-8"

14 15

11'-2"

16

17

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

16'-6"

A

B C D

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0"

BELOW.

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING SITECAST CONCRETE WALL - 2'-6"

MASS TIMBER COLUMN - 12"X12" (TYP.)

BELOW. BELOW.

E

5'-0"

5'-0"

15'-0"

5'-0"

6'-0"

4'-0" BELOW.

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

BELOW.

5'-11"

15'-4" P

4'-0"

8'-0"

BELOW.

5'-0"

BELOW.

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0" 24'-6"

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

N

5'-0"

6'-0"

BELOW.

M

O

5'-0"

50'-1" 47'-6"

6'-6"

12'-4"

SITECAST TWO-WAY CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB - 7"

Q

13'-3"

16'-6"

5'-0"

5'-0"

R

5'-0"

23'-8" 22'-10"

BELOW.

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

BELOW.

5'-0"

BELOW.

S

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

21'-7"

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM TUBE-2"X2"

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM GRATE -2'X4'X4"

T

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MEZZANINE PLAN

S1-03


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

A

16'-6"

CLT PANEL - 10'X40'X3 1/2"

GLULAM GIRDER 16"X36"

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

D

10'-0" O.C. TYP.

B C

15'-0"

E

GLULAM BEAM - 8"X36"

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

ROOF PLAN

S1-04


16'-6"

11'-5"

9'-3"

15'-5"

4'-0"

14'-0"

6'-0"

15'-1"

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

13'-1"

2'-10" 6'-8"

5'-0" 4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

5'-0"

23'-3"

21'-6"

5'-0"

23'-6"

4'-0"

4'-0" 18'-0" TYP.

5'-0" 8'-0" TYP.

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

18'-0" TYP.

6'-0" 36'-8" 5'-0"

9'-7"

8'-0" TYP.

2'-6"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

2'-6"

15'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0" 56'-6"

4'-0"

5'-11"

5'-0"

5'-6"

5'-0"

6'-0"

23'-6" 5'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

8'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

34'-2"

5'-6"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0" 12'-6"

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

12'-6"

8'-0"

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

6'-8"

4'-0"

4'-0"

13'-3"

6'-6"

4'-0"

9'-0"

5'-0"

10'-10"

10'-2"

46'-8"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0" 36'-4"

10'-2"

5'-0"

4'-0"

22'-10"

5'-0"

36'-5"

59'-6" 5'-0"

5'-0"

21'-7"

5'-0"

5'-0"

12'-6"

9'-10" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/04/2022

STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC

S1-05


MECHANICAL NARRATIVE The process of choosing active systems for the project was influenced by the zero-carbon agenda for the project, as well as the historical context for the project. The Ancient Roman context of the project relates to the ancient heating and cooling system of hypocausts, which was an under-floor system of heating with either hot air or water. The geothermal radiant flooring used in this project recalls that. A geothermal heat source was chosen because of the expansiveness of the site. The geothermal boreholes can be placed without too much restriction on the site. To maintain the heating and cooling system ideology throughout the entire building, a radiant cooling wall system was chosen to help with some of the cooling loads in the higher-occupancy spaces, such as the art gallery and the multipurpose room. To aid in ventilation and cooling in the higher-occupancy, more fluctuating-in-occupancy spaces, an A.H.U. unit was chosen, because it can be hooked up to a water-pump that can also be sourced from geothermal sources. The rest of the spaces in the building are aided in ventilation by E.R.V. systems, which aids in the zero-carbon agenda of the project.

LEGEND 0123145

ÿÿ!" #$%" %&' ÿÿ%"1 $+ÿ'% + ' (!$)$'# #$&) (!$)$'# #$&) 1& #& $ ' 1& #& $ ' ' 6$+ ' ' 6$+ ' '#& '#& !$)& ÿ%"1 $+ÿ'% + ' !$)& ÿ%"1 $+ÿ'% + ' 8284

676895

($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) *" ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6

1. RADIANT FLOOR SYSTEM 2. RADIANT WALL SYSTEM 3. ERV DUCTWORK 4. ERVS 5. AHU DUCTWORK 6. GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLES

4194ÿ 8 22 3ÿ 404 87ÿ82 6 8284 ÿ604 9ÿ21ÿ 2 91ÿ1225ÿ 8 22 3ÿ4 1ÿ 2 59ÿ 5 4194ÿ2 ÿ54 ÿ4 1ÿ6 00 7ÿ 86ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ6 00 7ÿ 14 ÿ 86ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ4 ÿ12256ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ196 ÿ4 1ÿ 2 916ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ9 4 68ÿ 2 916ÿ 8 ,-./ ,-./ 0/35 0/35 208, 208, /8/0 /8/0 3-/8 3-/8 /02/ /02/ 9

0. 2 /.

/.. 3. /..

0.

/..

0.

/..

7.

0..

0.

/..

/..

5...

04...

/

/

2..

5

,

-..

/

/

,

7

/,..

/

/

,

7

/,..

/

/

,

7

/,..

/

/

,

7

0...

/

/

,

7

ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.) GALVANIZED ALUMINUM DOWNSLOPING ENCLOSED GUTTER 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

GALVANIZED ALUMNUM ALUMINUM GUTTER -DOWNSPOUT - 6" 6" (TYP.) DIAMTER (TYP.)

BATHROOM DRAINAGE PIPE - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

Xref .\GRID LINES.dwg

2

3 5

1

4

6

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MECHANICAL NARRATIVE

M0-01


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

MANIFOLD A1 TO HEAT PUMP 02

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

MANIFOLD B1 TO HEAT PUMP 03

MANIFOLD A2 TO HEAT PUMP 02

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

16

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

17

12'-8"

MANIFOLD E1 TO HEAT PUMP 01

F2 TO A MANIFOLD HEAT PUMP 09

18

23'-3"

21'-6"

MANIFOLD E2 TO HEAT PUMP 01 HEAT PUMP 01 TO BOREHOLE 01

16'-6"

20

19

9'-11"

BOREHOLE 01 1200 FEET DEEP

HEAT PUMP 02 TO BOREHOLE 02 HEAT PUMP 03 TO BOREHOLE 03 HEAT PUMP 04 TO BOREHOLE 04

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

B C D

HEAT PUMP 05 TO BOREHOLE 05

HEAT PUMP 06 TO BOREHOLE 06 HEAT PUMP 07 TO BOREHOLE 07

MANIFOLD C1 TO HEAT PUMP 09

E

15'-0"

HEAT PUMP 08 TO BOREHOLE 08 HEAT PUMP 09 TO BOREHOLE 09

F

BOREHOLE 03 1200 FEET DEEP

6'-8"

HEAT PUMP 10 TO BOREHOLE 10

10'-4"

G

BOREHOLE 02 1200 FEET DEEP

BOREHOLE 04 1200 FEET DEEP

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H I J K L

MANIFOLD F1 TO HEAT PUMP 05

MANIFOLD E3 TO HEAT PUMP 05

BOREHOLE 05 1200 FEET DEEP

15'-4"

M

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

N O P

BOREHOLE 06 1200 FEET DEEP

MANIFOLD A3 TO HEAT PUMP 03 MANIFOLD D1 TO HEAT PUMP 08

13'-3"

Q BOREHOLE 07 1200 FEET DEEP

MANIFOLD F3 TO HEAT PUMP 10

MANIFOLD E4 TO HEAT PUMP 04

22'-10"

R

BOREHOLE 08 1200 FEET DEEP

S

MANIFOLD E5 TO HEAT PUMP 04

21'-7"

BOREHOLE 09 1200 FEET DEEP

T

MANIFOLD D2 TO HEAT PUMP 06

MANIFOLD D3 TO HEAT PUMP 07

BOREHOLE 10 1200 FEET DEEP

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

RADIANT FLOOR PLAN

M1-01


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

MANIFOLD A1 TO HEAT PUMP 02

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

MANIFOLD A2 TO HEAT PUMP 02

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

16'-6"

A

15'-0"

E

H

Xref .\M-1.dwg

I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

MANIFOLD F1 TO HEAT PUMP 05

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

MANIFOLD A3 TO HEAT PUMP 03

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

RADIANT WALL PLAN

M1-02


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

13

2'-10" 6'-8"

16

14 15

11'-2"

17

4'-0" 8'-1"

12'-8"

A.H.U EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

16'-6"

A

C D

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

BOREHOLE 09 450 FEET DEEP

9'-11"

A.H.U INTAKE DUCT TO EXTERIOR HEAT PUMP 09 TO BOREHOLE 09

ERV 1 EXHAUST LOUVER

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

B

3 TON AIR HANDLING UNIT TO HEAT PUMP 09

18

ERV INTAKE DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 5 1500 CFM UNIT

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

15'-0"

ERV 4 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 3 EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU FRESH AIR LOUVER

E ERV 4 FRESH AIR LOUVER

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 4 2000 CFM UNIT

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV INTAKE DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

I J K L

ERV 4 FRESH AIR LOUVER

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 4 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 2 EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 3 EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU EXHAUST LOUVER

15'-4" P

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 3 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 1 900 CFM UNIT

ERV 3 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 4 EXHUAST LOUVER

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

N

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR ERV EXHAUST DUCT ERV 2 TO EXTERIOR 1500 CFM UNIT

M

O

ERV 3 1500 CFM UNIT

ERV 4 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 2 FRESH AIR LOUVER

13'-3"

Q BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER

R

22'-10"

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 2 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 3 EXHAUST LOUVER

ERV 3 FRESH AIR LOUVER

21'-7"

S

ERV 2 EXHAUST LOUVER

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

VENTILATION PLAN

M1-03


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

16'-6"

GALVANIZED ALUMNUM ALUMINUM GUTTER -DOWNSPOUT - 6" 6" (TYP.) DIAMTER (TYP.)

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

C D

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

A

B

8

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM DOWNSLOPING ENCLOSED GUTTER 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

BATHROOM DRAINAGE PIPE - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

15'-0"

E

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

DRAINAGE PLAN

M1-04


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

16'-6"

GALVANIZED ALUMNUM ALUMINUM GUTTER -DOWNSPOUT - 6" 6" (TYP.) DIAMTER (TYP.)

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

C D

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

A

B

8

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM DOWNSLOPING ENCLOSED GUTTER 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

BATHROOM DRAINAGE PIPE - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

15'-0"

E

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MECHANICAL AXONOMETRIC

M2-01



AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY AUGST, SWITZERLAND SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET SHEET NUMBER A0-00 A0-01 A0-02 A0-03 A0-04 A0-05 A0-06 A0-07

SHEET NAME FRONT COVER CODE ANALYSIS OCCUPANCY LOADS EGRESS PLANS FIXTURES SITE PLAN SITE PLAN - IMMEDIATE BUILDING VIEWS

A1-01 A1-02 A1-03 A1-04

BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN MEZZANINE PLAN ROOF PLAN

A2-01 A2-02 A2-03

ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS SECTIONS

A3-03 A3-02

WALL COMPOSITE ASSEMBLY AXONOMETRIC

S0-01

STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE

S1-01 S1-02 S1-03 S1-04

FOUNDATION PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN MEZZANINE PLAN ROOF PLAN

S2-01

STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC

M0-01

MECHANICAL NARRATIVE

M1-01 M1-02 M1-03 M1-04

RADIANT FLOORING PLAN RADIANT WALL PLAN VENTILATION PLAN DRAINAGE PLAN

M2-01

MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC


area net

area gross

category (assembly..)

subcategory (A3, A4, B1,..)

coeff. Factor (feet) net/gross

# of occp.

coeff. of egress. (in) in of egress

trav. Dist. (feet) common path of travel (ft) male

female

Toilet (m)

total toilets (m) Toilet (fem)

total toilets (fem) urinals

water fountain total water fountains

total urinals

Info cente/reception

500

800 Assembly

A3

5 net

100.0

0.3

30

250

75

50

50 1 per 125

0.4 1 per 65

0.8 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.268 1 per 500

0.2

Multi-purpose room

3000

4800 Assembly

A3

15 net

200.0

0.3

60

250

75

100

100 1 per 125

0.8 1 per 65

1.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.536 1 per 500

0.4

Artifacts gallery

2000

3200 Assembly

A3

30 net

66.7

0.3

20

250

75

33.33333333

33.33333333 1 per 125

0.2666666667 1 per 65

0.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1786666667 1 per 500

0.1333333333

cloakroom

300

480 Assembly

A3

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

250

75

0.8

0.8 1 per 125

0.0064 1 per 65

0.01 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.004288 1 per 500

0.0032

Cafeteria/kitchennette

500

800 Assembly

A2

200 gross

4.0

0.3

1.2

250

75

2

0.05 1 per 40

0.05 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.0335 1 per 500

0.008

IT control room

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

Common office/lounge

600

960 Assembly

A-3

15 net

40.0

0.3

12

250

75

20

20 1 per 125

0.3076923077 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1072 1 per 500

0.08

Director's office

150

240 Business

B

100 net

1.5

0.3

0.45

300

100

0.75

0.75 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.015 1 per 100

0.015

meeting rooms

400

640 Business

B

15 net

26.7

0.3

8

300

100

13.33333333

13.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.2666666667 1 per 100

0.2666666667

3000

4800 Business

B

50 net

60.0

0.3

18

300

100

30

30 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.6 1 per 100

0.6

300

480 Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

8000

12800 Business

B

300 gross

42.7

0.3

12.8

300

100

21.33333333

21.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.4266666667 1 per 100

0.4266666667

IT room

400

640 Business

B

300 gross

2.1

0.3

0.64

300

100

1.066666667

1.066666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.04266666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.04266666667 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02133333333 1 per 100

0.02133333333

Waste room/recycling

200

320 Factory

F-1

300 gross

1.1

0.3

0.32

250

100

0.5333333333

0.005333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.002666666667 1 per 400

0.002666666667

Equipment room

600

960 Business

B

300 gross

3.2

0.3

0.96

300

100

1.6

1.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.032 1 per 100

0.032

Locker room/changing area

600

960 Business

B

50 gross

19.2

0.3

5.76

300

100

9.6

9.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.192 1 per 100

0.192

Laundry room

250

400 Factory

F-1

50 gross

8.0

0.3

2.4

250

100

4

0.04 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02 1 per 400

0.02

Laboratory Vault Storage module

Totals:

21100

33760

579.9

173.97

289.95

2 1 per 40

0.5333333333 1 per 100

4 1 per 100 289.95

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.16 1 per 65

0.005333333333 1 per 100

0.04 1 per 100 5

6

2.7

2.4



# of occp.

EGRESS REQUIRED: 173.97” trav. Dist. (feet) common path of travel (ft) male female Toilet (m)

coeff. of egress. (in) in of egress

total toilets (m) Toilet (fem)

TOTAL EGRESS PROVIDED: 384” 50 50 1 per 125

100.0

0.3

30

250

75

200.0

0.3

60

250

75

100

66.7

0.3

20

250

75

1.6

0.3

0.48

250

4.0

0.3

1.2

1.6

0.3

40.0

total toilets (fem) urinals

water fountain total water fountains

total urinals

0.4 1 per 65

0.8 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.268 1 per 500

0.2

100 1 per 125

0.8 1 per 65

1.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.536 1 per 500

0.4

33.33333333

33.33333333 1 per 125

0.2666666667 1 per 65

0.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1786666667 1 per 500

0.1333333333

75

0.8

0.8 1 per 125

0.0064 1 per 65

0.01 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.004288 1 per 500

0.0032

250

75

2

0.05 1 per 40

0.05 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.0335 1 per 500

0.008

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

0.3

12

250

75

20

20 1 per 125

0.3076923077 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1072 1 per 500

0.08

1.5

0.3

0.45

300

100

0.75

0.75 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.015 1 per 100

0.015

26.7

0.3

8

300

100

13.33333333

13.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.2666666667 1 per 100

0.2666666667

60.0

0.3

18

300

100

30

30 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.6 1 per 100

0.6

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

42.7

0.3

12.8

300

100

21.33333333

21.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.4266666667 1 per 100

0.4266666667

2.1

0.3

0.64

300

100

1.066666667

1.066666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.04266666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.04266666667 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02133333333 1 per 100

0.02133333333

1.1

0.3

0.32

250

100

0.5333333333

0.005333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.002666666667 1 per 400

0.002666666667

3.2

0.3

0.96

300

100

1.6

1.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.032 1 per 100

0.032

19.2

0.3

5.76

300

100

9.6

9.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.192 1 per 100

0.192

8.0

0.3

2.4

250

100

4

0.04 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02 1 per 400

0.02

173.97

579.9

2 1 per 40

0.16 1 per 65

0.5333333333 1 per 100

289.95

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.005333333333 1 per 100

4 1 per 100

0.04 1 per 100

289.95

5

6

2.7

2.4

Width: 48”

112’-0”

51’-0”

Width: 48”

38’6”

70’-0”

126’-0”

94’-0”

133’-0”

26’-0” 60’-0”

230’-0”

119’-0”

182’-0”

77’-0”

120’-0”

Width: 48”

Width: 48”

88’-0”

Width: 48”

100’-0”90’-0”

30’-0”

114’-0”

Width: 96”

41’-0”

82’0”

56’-0”

Width: 48”

76’-0”


# of occp.

coeff. of egress. (in) in of egress

Assembly

A3

5 net

100.0

0.3

30

250

75

50

50 1 per 125

0.4 1 per 65

0.8 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.268 1 per 500

0.2

Assembly

A3

15 net

200.0

0.3

60

250

75

100

100 1 per 125

0.8 1 per 65

1.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.536 1 per 500

0.4

Assembly

A3

30 net

66.7

0.3

20

250

75

33.33333333

33.33333333 1 per 125

0.2666666667 1 per 65

0.5 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1786666667 1 per 500

0.1333333333

Assembly

A3

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.0032

Assembly

A2

200 gross

4.0

0.3

1.2

250

75

2

0.004288 9'-11" 1 per 500 0.0335 1 per 500

0.008

Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

Assembly

A-3

15 net

40.0

0.3

12

250

75

20

20 1 per 125

0.3076923077 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

0.1072 1 per 500

0.08

Business

B

100 net

1.5

0.3

0.45

300

100

0.75

0.75 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.03 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.015 1 per 100

0.015

Business

B

15 net

26.7

0.3

8

300

100

13.33333333

13.33333333 1 per 25 for FINISH first - 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.5333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.2666666667 1 per 100

0.2666666667

Business

B

50 net

60.0

0.3

18

300

100

30

30 1 per 25 for - SEEfirst A3.01 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

1.2 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.6 1 per 100

0.6

Business

B

300 gross

1.6

0.3

0.48

300

100

0.8

0.8 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.032 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.016 1 per 100

0.016

Business

B

300 gross

42.7

0.3

12.8

300

100

21.33333333

21.33333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.8533333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.4266666667 1 per 100

0.4266666667

Business

B

300 gross

2.1

0.3

0.64

300

100

1.066666667

1.066666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.04266666667 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.04266666667 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02133333333 1 per 100

0.02133333333

Factory

F-1

300 gross

1.1

0.3

0.32

250

100

0.5333333333

0.005333333333 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.002666666667 1 per 400

0.002666666667

Business

B

300 gross

3.2

0.3

0.96

300

100

1.6

1.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.064 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.032 1 per 100

0.032

Business

B

50 gross

19.2

0.3

5.76

300

100

9.6

9.6 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after

0.384 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.192 1 per 100

0.192

Factory

F-1

50 gross

8.0

0.3

2.4

250

100

4

0.04 should not substitute more than 50% of water closets

0.02 1 per 400

0.02

16'-6"

subcategory (A3, A4, B1,..)

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

coeff. Factor (feet) net/gross

0.48

9'-3"

250

15'-5"

14'-0" 75

female

6'-0" 0.8

289.95

173.97

Toilet (m)

5'-11" 15'-1" 0.8 1 per 125

total toilets (m) Toilet (fem)

8'-7"

12'-10"

13'-1" 0.0064 12'-10" per 65 6'-8"

2 1 per 40

4'-0" 8'-1"

0.032 1 per 25 for first 50, 1 per 50 after 0.16 1 per 65

0.5333333333 1 per 100

289.95

11'-2"

0.05 1 per 40

CORRUGATED METAL

4 1 per 100

total toilets (fem) urinals

0.005333333333 1 per 100

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

0.04 1 per 100 5

12'-8" 0.01

total urinals

23'-3" should not substitute more than 67% of water closets 21'-6"

0.05 should not substitute more than 67% of water closets

6

2.7

2.4

21'-7"

22'-10"

13'-3"

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

6'-8"

15'-0"

579.9

11'-5"

trav. Dist. (feet) common path of travel (ft) male

water fountain total water fountains

category (assembly..)

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FIXTURE COUNTS

A0-04


VENT OOM TER BATHR DIAMEM1.02 - 6" - SEE STACK (TYP.) CORR

D METAL A3.01 UGATE - SEE

-

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

100'

300'

FINISH

0'

500'

AMANDA THISDALE

N

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1:100 DATE :

05/22/2022

SITE PLAN

A0-05


AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/32" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

SITE PLAN

A0-06

E - SE LD E2 M1.01

IFO

MAN E - SE LD E1 M1.01

IFO

MAN

VER

E - SE LD B1 M1.01

IFO

MAN

LOU AUST 03 EXH R - E M1. SE

-

UVE

R LO H AI FRES M1.03 SEE

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

E - SE LD A2 M1.01

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH

TAIN

CUR

L STEE" 4"X5

ION

MULL

EXH

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

-

EXH

.) (TYP PE 04 E PI E M1. - SE

NAG

DRAI

-3"

L - 0'

WAL

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

IFO

MAN

E - SE LD A1 M1.01

IFO

MAN

R DOO E NCE SUR NTA NTE ENCLO " (TYP.) 2'-4 FOR

MAI

E - SE LD F2 M1.01

IFO

MAN

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

BEAM BER S1.04 TIM VY SEE HEA X12 - 12

LY MAL D THER VATE ACTI TING LA INSU E LOAD E CRET - SE CON WALL S1.02 ING

BEAR

FRES

FRES

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

.) (TYP OUT E M1.04 SE

NSP

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

DOW

H AI

BER TIM VY SEE HEA X12 - .02 S1 - 12 MN

FRES

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

NEW

EXH

COLU

E RET ONC L - 2" TC CAS H WAL SITE FINIS

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH

GS TIN PLAN (TYP.)

YP.)

S (T

VER

K PA

BRIC

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

EXH

H AI

FRES RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

E - SE LD E3 M1.01

IFO

MAN

H AI

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

VER

LOU AUST EXH M1.03 SEE

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

E 1 - SE LD C M1.01 IFO VER MAN LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

-

EXH

E - SE LD E1 M1.01

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

IFO

MAN

EXH

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

ESS

EGR

" 3'-9 R.) (TYP

FRES

RUVE R LO E M1.03 SE

H AI

FRES

DOO

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

E - SE LD E4 M1.01

IFO

MAN

EXH

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

E CRET CON R SOIL K IN D FO BREA SLAB URTYAR CO HIN WIT

H AI

FRES

OLD

IF MAN E - SE LD A3 M1.01

SEE D1 - 1.01 M

IFO

MAN

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

E

- SE LD E5 M1.01

IFO

MAN

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

FRES

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

EXH

NG LATI N INSU TITIO " R E PA L - 0'-6 CRET WAL

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M EXH

CON BB

R-

UVE

6

A2-0

R LO H AI FRES M1.03 SEE

E - SE LD F3 M1.01 IFO

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH RUVE R LO E M1.03 SE

H AI

MAN

FRES

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH

RUVE R LO M1.03 SEE

H AI

FRES

E 3 - SE 01 M1.

LD D

IFO

MAN

E 2 - SE 01 M1.

LD D

IFO

MAN

VER LOU 1.03 AUST SEE M

EXH



1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

SOUTH A2-01

A

A.H.U - SEE M1.01

16'-6"

HEAT PUMP (TYP.) SEE M1.01 HEAT PUMP (TYP.) SEE M1.01

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

FOUNDATION WALL (TYP.) - SEE S1.01

E.R.V UNIT (TYP.) SEE M1.01

15'-0"

E

CONCRETE COLUMN (TYP.) - SEE S1.01

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

I J K L

001

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

MECHANICAL

M

N O P

15'-4"

A2-01

E.R.V UNIT (TYP.) SEE M1.01

WEST A2-02

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

EAST

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

NORTH A2-02

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

BASEMENT PLAN

A1-01


1

4

3

2

11'-5"

15'-5"

9'-3"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

8

5'-11"

15'-1"

9

8'-7"

12

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

16

14 15

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

17

23'-3"

21'-6"

AA A2-03

20

19

9'-11"

SOUTH A2-01

MAINTENTANCE DOOR FOR ENCLOSURE 2'-4" (TYP.)

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

16'-6"

MANIFOLD F2 - SEE A M1.01

MANIFOLD A1 - SEE M1.01

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE LOAD BEARING WALL - SEE S1.02

MANIFOLD B1 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD A2 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD E1 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD E2 - SEE M1.01

CURTAIN WALL - 0'-3" JANITORSCLOS. HEAVY TIMBER BEAM - 12X12 - SEE S1.04

SITECAST CONCRETE FINISH WALL - 2" EQUIPMENT 101

FRESH AIR 114LOUVER SEE M1.03

STEEL MULLION 4"X5"

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

FRESH AIR LOUVER -EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03 SEE M1.03

MEETING

MEETING

116

117

DRAINAGE PIPE (TYP.) - SEE M1.04 HEAVY TIMBER COLUMN - 12X12 - SEE S1.02 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03 MULTIPURPOSE 108

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

MANIFOLD C1 - SEE M1.01

E

15'-0"

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

COMMONOFF. 115

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

CLOAKROOM 102

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

F

6'-8"

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EGRESS DOOR - 3'-9" (TYP.)

I J K L

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

113

103 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

NEW PLANTINGS (TYP.)

MANIFOLD E1 - SEE M1.01 ELECTRICAL

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

112

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

GALLERY 109

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

MANIFOLD E3 - SEE M1.01

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03 LAB

VAULT

120

121

P

BB

A2-03

122

WEST A2-02

15'-4"

BREAK IN CONCRETE SLAB FOR SOIL WITHIN COURTYARD FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

CAFE

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

O

STORAGE

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

EAST

N

BRICK PAVERS (TYP.)

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

M

A2-01

DOWNSPOUT (TYP.) SEE M1.04

IT

RECEPTION

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

119

LOCKERROOM 118

10'-4"

G

DIRECTOR'SOFF.

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

104 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

JANITORSCLOS. 111 MANIFOLD D1 - SEE MANIFOLD A3 - SEE M1.01 M1.01

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

INSULATING CONCRETE PARTITION WALL - 0'-6"

13'-3"

Q MANIFOLD F3 - SEE M1.01

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03 WASTE/RECYCLING EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

R

105 MANIFOLD E4 - SEE M1.01 FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

22'-10"

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

LAB 110

123

LAUNDRY EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

106

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

S

STORAGE

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

FRESH AIR LOUVER SEE M1.03

MANIFOLD E5 - SEE M1.01

IT

21'-7"

107

EXHAUST LOUVER SEE M1.03

T

MANIFOLD D2 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD D3 - SEE M1.01

NORTH A2-02

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

A1-02


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

8

5'-11"

15'-1"

9

8'-7"

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

16

14 15

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

17

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

AA

9'-11"

A2-03 SOUTH A2-01

MANIFOLD B1 - SEE M1.01

MANIFOLD E2 - SEE M1.01

A

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

16'-6"

CURTAIN WALL - 0'-3" (TYP.)

JANITORSCLOS. 114

HEAVY TIMBER BEAM - 12X12 - SEE S1.04

EQUIPMENT 101

SITECAST CONCRETE FINISH WALL - 2" (TYP.)

MEETING

STEEL MULLION 4"X5"

MEETING

116

117

HEAVY TIMBER COLUMN - 12X12 - SEE S1.02

MULTIPURPOSE 108

COMMONOFF.

E

15'-0"

115

CLOAKROOM 102

F

6'-8" 10'-4"

G

I J K L

118

113

103

N O P

BB

A2-03

15'-4" 11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

A2-01

DOWNSPOUT (TYP.) SEE M1.04

IT

RECEPTION

ELECTRICAL 112

GALLERY 109

LAB

VAULT

120

121

STORAGE 122

BELOW (TYP.)

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE LOADBEARING WALL SEE S1.03

M EAST

119

LOCKERROOM

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

DIRECTOR'SOFF.

WEST A2-02 SITECAST CONCRETE RAILING - 3'-6" X 6"

CAFE 104

SITECAST CONCRETE SLAB - 0'-10" - SEE S1.03

Q

13'-3"

MEZZANINE 50

WASTE/RECYCLING 105

R LAB

STORAGE

22'-10"

110

123

LAUNDRY 106

S

21'-7"

IT 107

T

NORTH

N

A2-02

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN

A1-03


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

13'-1"

12'-10"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

SOUTH A2-01

FINISH CORRUGATED METAL - SEE A3.01

16'-6"

A

C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

B

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

15'-0"

E

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

M

WEST

EAST

N O P

15'-4"

A2-02

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

A2-01

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

NORTH A2-02

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

ROOF PLAN

A1-04


A

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

O

N

Q

P

S

R

T

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

C

B

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01 ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02

ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

NEW PLANTING (TYP.) SEE A1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0" LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

A2-01

EAST ELEVATION

1

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

Xref .\FL-BSMT.dwg

EAST

3

2

4

5

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

6

7

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

8

9

10

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

11

12

13

14 15

16

17

18

19

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CONCRETE FINISH WALL - SEE A1.02 B.O.ROOF 020'-0" ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01 T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02 LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

NORTH A2-02

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

NORTH ELEVATION

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

ELEVATIONS

A2.01


T

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

Q

R

S

P

O

N

M

L

K

J

I

H

G

E

F

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

D

B

C

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

A

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CONCRETE FINISH WALL - SEE A1.02 ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0" LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

WEST A2-02

WEST ELEVATION

19

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

CONCRETE FINISH WALL - SEE A1.02

B.O.ROOF 020'-0" ENCLOSURE SYSTEM (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

8

7

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

6

5

4

3

2

1

BATHROOM VENT STACK -12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF - SEE M1.03

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

LOW-E CURTAIN WALL - SEE A1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 5'X8' (TYP.)

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

LOW-E ALUMINUM VERTICALLY PIVOTED WINDOW - 4'-6"X9'-6" (TYP.)

T.O.FOOTING -008'-10" B.O.FOOTING -0011'-10"

SOUTH A2-01

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

SOUTH ELEVATION

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

ELEVATIONS

A2.02


A

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

B

C

D

E

G

F

H

J

I

K

L

M

N

O

Q

P

S

R

T

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

ROOF ENCLOSURE (TYP.) - SEE A3.01 SOUTHEN PINE GLULAM GIRDER - SEE S1.04 SOUTHEN PINE GLULAM GIRDER - SEE S1.04 ENCLOSURE SYSTEM - SEE A3.01

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

MULTIPURPOSE 108

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.)

RADIANT WALL SYSTEM - SEE M1.02

AHU FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - SEE A1.02

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING LOADBEARING CONCRETE WALL SEE S1.02

SITECAST CONCRETE RAILING - SEE A1.03 CONCRETE SLAB S1.03

GALLERY

110

THERMALLY ACTIVATED CONCRETE SLAB ERV EXHAUST DUCT - SEE M1.01 AND S1.02 SEE M1.03 ERV EXHAUST DUCT SEE M1.03

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03 ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

LABORATORY

109

BRICK PAVERS - SEE A1.02

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

FERTILE SOIL DEHYDRATED GEOCOMPOSITES TAR BASE SCREED

T.O.FOOTING -010'-6" B.O.FOOTING -0013'-6" GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE PIPE - SEE M1.01

AA A2-03

SECTION AA

1

T.O.ROOF 028'-6"

4

3

2

RADIANT WALL SYSTEM - SEE M1.02

SOUTHEN PINE GLULAM GIRDER - SEE S1.04 THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING LOADBEARING CONCRETE WALL SEE S1.02

T.O.MEZZANINEFINISHFLOOR 012'-0"

T.O.FINISHFLOOR 000'-0"

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 15

16

17

18

19

20

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 12" ABOVE T.O. ROOF (TYP.) - SEE M1.02

ROOF ENCLOSURE (TYP.) - SEE A3.01

B.O.ROOF 020'-0"

5

FERTILE SOIL

ALUMINUM FLASHING (TYP.)

ENCLOSURE SYSTEM - SEE A3.01 CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - SEE A1.02

CONCRETE SLAB S1.03

CAFE

GALLERY

LABORATORY

104

109

120

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

TAR BASE DEHYDRATED GEOCOMPOSITES SCREED

THERMALLY ACTIVATED CONCRETE SLAB SEE M1.01 AND S1.02

ERV EXHAUST DUCTSEE M1.03

RADIANT FLOORING MANIFOLD - SEE M1.01

STORAGE 122

ERV EXHUAST DUCT SEE M1.03

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT - SEE M1.03

GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE PIPE - SEE M1.01

ERV EXHUAST DUCT SEE M1.03

T.O.FOOTING -010'-6" B.O.FOOTING -0013'-6"

BB A2-03

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

SECTION BB

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

SECTIONS

A2.03


A

B

A

LEGEND 1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING 8’X3’ 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - 3’-0” 3. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 4” 4. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 6” 5. GRAVEL - 6” 6. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB - 10” 7. SCREED - 4” 8. GEOTHERMAL RADIANT FLOORING 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH TILE FLOORING WITH 1/4” MORTAR- 3/16” 10. CAST-IN-PLACE LOAD-BEARING THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE WALL - 2-6” 11. RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM 12. ALUMINUM TUBE - 2” 13. ALUMINUM MAINTENANCE GRATE - 2” DEEP 14. LED STRIP LIGHTING 15. LOW-E TERRA-COTTA TINTED GLASS PANELS 16. TERRA-COTTA TINTED ALUMINUM FIN - 1’-0” DEEP 17. INSECT SCREEN 18. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM 16”X36” 19. SOUTHERN PINE CLT PANEL 10’X40’X3.5” 20. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH - 2” 21. ALUMINUM ROOF FLASHING 22. GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE PLATE 23. DRAINAGE PIPE 24. STEEL TUBE FRAMING 25. MAINTENANCE LADDER 26. ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM

5'-6" 3

20

21 19 26

18 22

6'-3"

17

16

11

15

12

12

14

13

24

25 10

7

8

9

3 5

6

2 4

3 5

6

1

23

ELEVATION

SECTION

A

PLAN

AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/2" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/04/2022

ASSEMBLY COMPOSITE

A3-01


LEGEND

20 19

3

21 18 26

4

16 15

14

13 12 24

10

7

8

9

3

6

5

4 2

6

5

3 5 1

23

1. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING 8’X3’ 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL - 3’-0” 3. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 4” 4. RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION - 6” 5. GRAVEL - 6” 6. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB - 10” 7. SCREED - 4” 8. GEOTHERMAL RADIANT FLOORING 9. POLISHED CONCRETE FINISH TILE FLOORING WITH 1/4” MORTAR- 3/16” 10. CAST-IN-PLACE LOAD-BEARING THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING CONCRETE WALL - 2-6” 11. RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING WALL SYSTEM 12. ALUMINUM TUBE - 2” 13. ALUMINUM MAINTENANCE GRATE - 2” DEEP 14. LED STRIP LIGHTING 15. LOW-E TERRA-COTTA TINTED GLASS PANELS 16. TERRA-COTTA TINTED ALUMINUM FIN - 1’-0” DEEP 17. INSECT SCREEN 18. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM BEAM 16”X36” 19. SOUTHERN PINE CLT PANEL 10’X40’X3.5” 20. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM ROOF FINISH - 2” 21. ALUMINUM ROOF FLASHING 22. GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE PLATE 23. DRAINAGE PIPE 24. STEEL TUBE FRAMING 25. MAINTENANCE LADDER 26. ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM


STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE

16'-6"

Almost all of the areas of the building utilize concrete load bearing walls. The load bearing walls distinguish program space from program space, which therefore reinforces the cellular nature of the plan. The transition 1 spaces, such as the informal courtyards and anterooms are treated with concrete partition walls. This creates the uniformity of materiality to connect the spaces, but the difference in wall thickness separates these dif- 11'-5" ferent functional spaces. The separation in structure occurs at the formal courtyards. These elements are light and bring in air, so they are treated separately from the heavy structural elements of the loadbearing concrete. The curtain walls that surround the courtyard spaces are supported by heavy timber columns and beams. This relates back to the site’s greater context of Switzerland, where wood is an abundant resource. This creates A moments of relief from the heavy concrete structural system. The exposed structure creates an interior relationship that can be glanced at from the exterior through the glass of the courtyards, but creates a hermetic interior experience of discovering different programmatic spaces through little separation of materiality of the structural system. B

9'-3"

15'-5"

4'-0"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

9

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

2'-10" 6'-8"

5'-0" 4'-0"

5'-0"

13

14 15

17

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

5'-0"

16

5'-0"

23'-3"

21'-6"

5'-0"

23'-6"

18'-0" TYP.

5'-0"

9'-11"

4'-0"

5'-0"

8'-0" TYP.

18'-0" TYP.

6'-0" 36'-8" 5'-0"

9'-7"

8'-0" TYP.

2'-6"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

2'-6"

4'-0"

I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

6'-8"

15'-0"

5'-0"

20

19

4'-0"

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

The structure of the building relates to the sustainable agenda for this project through utilizing strategies that lower concrete’s Ccarbon footprint. While concrete’s carbon footprint is relatively low, it has a high embodied D energy. Initially, the building is designed for expansion, rather than demolition then new construction, so the risk of releasing the embodied carbon is lower. Secondly, thermally insulated concrete Eis achieved through the use of perlite and bio-aggregates. Bio-aggregates have a relatively high thermally-insulating value, and are made from organic materials. The high insulating value of the structural system reduces the need for extra artificial insulation, and promotes high thermal F heating and mass, which reduces the need for mechanically-assisted cooling systems. The heavy timber aspect of the project also utilizes organic materials, and an abundant natural resource forGthe local region. Wood has a low carbon footprint, and low embodied carbon. The restrained use of heavy timber throughout the building is conscious towards deforestation and looks to explore other sustainable structure 8'-0" H methods through expanding and altering classing loadbearing concrete construction.

4

3

2

15'-4" P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

O

4'-0"

4'-0" 56'-6"

4'-0"

5'-11"

5'-0"

5'-6"

5'-0"

6'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

8'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

23'-6"

M

N

12'-6"

34'-2"

5'-6"

4'-0"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

12'-6"

5'-0"

4'-0"

6'-6"

4'-0"

13'-3"

Q

9'-0"

5'-0"

10'-10"

10'-2"

46'-8"

4'-0"

5'-0" 36'-4"

10'-2"

R

22'-10"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

36'-5"

59'-6"

S

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

21'-7"

5'-0"

5'-0"

T

12'-6"

9'-10" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE

S0-01


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

18

12'-8"

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

A

16'-6"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL 1'-0"

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL 3'-0" (TYP.)

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE STRIP FOOTING - 8'-0" (TYP.)

E

15'-0"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE STRIP FOOTING - 3'-0"

10'-4"

SITECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS - 2'X2' (TYP.)

I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

PERFORATION IN STRUCTURE FOR DUCTWORK (TYP.)

1'-0" (TYP.)

G

6'-8"

F

N O

3'-0" TYP.

4'-0"

P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FOUNDATION STRUCTURE

S1-01


1

11'-5"

16'-6"

A

9'-3"

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 18" (TYP.)

D

15'-0"

E

5

6'-0"

14'-0"

7

6

15'-1"

8

9

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

14 15

5'-0"

16

17

18

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

2'-10" 6'-8"

5'-0" 4'-0"

5'-0"

13

5'-0"

23'-3"

21'-6"

5'-0"

23'-6"

18'-0" TYP. SOUTHERN PINE GLULAM COLUMN 12"X12" (TYP.)

5'-0"

18'-0" TYP.

6'-0" 5'-0" PERFORATION FOR

9'-11"

4'-0"

5'-0"

8'-0" TYP.

SITECAST TWO-WAY CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB - 10"

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 36" (TYP.)

9'-7"

8'-0" TYP.

2'-6"

36'-8" 5'-0"

20

19

4'-0"

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

C

15'-5"

4'-0"

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING SITECAST CONCRETE WALL - 2'-6" (TYP.)

B

4

3

2

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

2'-6"

LOUVER - 12" X 24" (TYP.)

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 12" (TYP.)

F

H I J K L

6'-8" 15'-4"

P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

O

4'-0"

8'-0" 56'-6"

4'-0"

5'-11"

5'-0"

5'-6"

5'-0"

6'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

8'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

23'-6"

M

N

12'-6"

4'-0"

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

4'-0"

34'-2"

5'-6"

4'-0"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

12'-6"

5'-0"

4'-0"

6'-6"

4'-0"

13'-3"

Q

9'-0"

5'-0"

10'-10"

10'-2"

46'-8"

4'-0"

5'-0" 36'-4"

10'-2"

R

22'-10"

PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 24" (TYP.)

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

36'-5"

59'-6"

S

4'-0"

5'-0" PERFORATION FOR LOUVER - 12" X 24" (TYP.)

5'-0"

21'-7"

5'-0"

5'-0"

T

12'-6"

9'-10" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

S1-02


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

7

6

6'-0"

14'-0"

15'-1"

8

9

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

13

2'-10" 6'-8"

14 15

11'-2"

16

17

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

16'-6"

A

B C D

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0"

BELOW.

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

THERMALLY ACTIVATED INSULATING SITECAST CONCRETE WALL - 2'-6"

5'-0"

5'-0"

MASS TIMBER COLUMN - 12"X12" (TYP.)

BELOW. BELOW.

E

5'-0"

5'-0"

15'-0"

5'-0"

6'-0"

4'-0" BELOW.

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

BELOW.

5'-11"

15'-4" P

4'-0"

8'-0"

BELOW.

5'-0"

BELOW.

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0" 24'-6"

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

O

5'-0"

6'-0"

BELOW.

M

N

5'-0"

50'-1" 47'-6"

6'-6"

12'-4"

SITECAST TWO-WAY CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB - 7"

Q

13'-3"

16'-6"

5'-0"

5'-0"

R

5'-0"

23'-8" 22'-10"

BELOW.

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

BELOW.

5'-0"

BELOW.

S

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

21'-7"

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM TUBE-2"X2"

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM GRATE -2'X4'X4"

T

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MEZZANINE PLAN

S1-03


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

A

16'-6"

CLT PANEL - 10'X40'X3 1/2"

GLULAM GIRDER 16"X36"

D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

C

10'-0" O.C. TYP.

B

15'-0"

E

GLULAM BEAM - 8"X36"

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

ROOF PLAN

S1-04


16'-6 16'-6""

11'-5"

9'-3"

15'-5"

4'-0"

14'-0"

6'-0"

15'-1"

5'-11"

8'-7"

12'-10"

13'-1"

2'-10" 6'-8"

5'-0" 4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

12'-8"

4'-0" 8'-1"

11'-2"

5'-0"

23'-3"

21'-6"

5'-0"

23'-6"

4'-0"

4'-0" 18'-0" TYP.

5'-0" 8'-0" TYP.

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

18'-0" TYP.

6'-0" 36'-8" 5'-0"

9'-7"

8'-0" TYP.

2'-6"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

2'-6"

15'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

8'-0" 56'-6"

4'-0"

5'-11"

5'-0"

5'-6"

5'-0"

6'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

8'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

23'-6"

34'-2"

5'-6"

4'-0"

5'-0" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

12'-6"

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

12'-6"

4'-0"

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

6'-8"

4'-0"

4'-0"

6'-6"

13'-3"

5'-0"

4'-0"

9'-0"

5'-0"

10'-10"

10'-2"

46'-8"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

4'-0"

5'-0" 36'-4"

10'-2"

5'-0"

4'-0"

22'-10"

5'-0"

36'-5"

59'-6" 5'-0"

5'-0"

21'-7"

5'-0"

5'-0"

12'-6"

9'-10" 5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

5'-0"

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA FACILITY

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/04/2022

STRUCTURAL AXONOMETRIC

S1-05


MECHANICAL NARRATIVE The process of choosing active systems for the project was influenced by the zero-carbon agenda for the project, as well as the historical context for the project. The Ancient Roman context of the project relates to the ancient heating and cooling system of hypocausts, which was an under-floor system of heating with either hot air or water. The geothermal radiant flooring used in this project recalls that. A geothermal heat source was chosen because of the expansiveness of the site. The geothermal boreholes can be placed without too much restriction on the site. To maintain the heating and cooling system ideology throughout the entire building, a radiant cooling wall system was chosen to help with some of the cooling loads in the higher-occupancy spaces, such as the art gallery and the multipurpose room. To aid in ventilation and cooling in the higher-occupancy, more fluctuating-in-occupancy spaces, an A.H.U. unit was chosen, because it can be hooked up to a water-pump that can also be sourced from geothermal sources. The rest of the spaces in the building are aided in ventilation by E.R.V. systems, which aids in the zero-carbon agenda of the project.

LEGEND 0123145

ÿÿ!" #$%" %&' ÿÿ%"1 $+ÿ'% + ' (!$)$'# #$&) (!$)$'# #$&) 1& #& $ ' 1& #& $ ' ' 6$+ ' ' 6$+ ' '#& '#& !$)& ÿ%"1 $+ÿ'% + ' !$)& ÿ%"1 $+ÿ'% + ' 8284

676895

($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) *" ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6 ($ )#ÿ* #$) ÿ )(ÿ+&& $) 6

1. RADIANT FLOOR SYSTEM 2. RADIANT WALL SYSTEM 3. ERV DUCTWORK 4. ERVS 5. AHU DUCTWORK 6. GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLES

4194ÿ 8 22 3ÿ 404 87ÿ82 6 8284 ÿ604 9ÿ21ÿ 2 91ÿ1225ÿ 8 22 3ÿ4 1ÿ 2 59ÿ 5 4194ÿ2 ÿ54 ÿ4 1ÿ6 00 7ÿ 86ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ6 00 7ÿ 14 ÿ 86ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ4 ÿ12256ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ196 ÿ4 1ÿ 2 916ÿ 8 4194ÿ2 ÿ9 4 68ÿ 2 916ÿ 8 ,-./ ,-./ 0/35 0/35 208, 208, /8/0 /8/0 3-/8 3-/8 /02/ /02/ 9

0. 2 /.

/.. 3. /..

0.

/..

0.

/..

7.

0..

0.

/..

/..

5...

04...

/

/

-..

/

/,..

2..

5

,

/

,

7

/

/

,

7

/,..

/

/

,

7

/,..

/

/

,

7

0...

/

/

,

7

ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.) GALVANIZED ALUMINUM DOWNSLOPING ENCLOSED GUTTER 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

GALVANIZED ALUMNUM ALUMINUM GUTTER -DOWNSPOUT - 6" 6" (TYP.) DIAMTER (TYP.)

BATHROOM DRAINAGE PIPE - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

Xref .\GRID LINES.dwg

2

3 5

1

4

6

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE Xref .\GRID LINES.dwg

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MECHANICAL NARRATIVE

M0-01


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

MANIFOLD A1 TO HEAT PUMP 02

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

MANIFOLD B1 TO HEAT PUMP 03

MANIFOLD A2 TO HEAT PUMP 02

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

16

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

17

12'-8"

MANIFOLD E1 TO HEAT PUMP 01

F2 TO A MANIFOLD HEAT PUMP 09

18

23'-3"

21'-6"

MANIFOLD E2 TO HEAT PUMP 01 HEAT PUMP 01 TO BOREHOLE 01

16'-6"

20

19

9'-11"

BOREHOLE 01 1200 FEET DEEP

HEAT PUMP 02 TO BOREHOLE 02 HEAT PUMP 03 TO BOREHOLE 03 HEAT PUMP 04 TO BOREHOLE 04

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

B C D

HEAT PUMP 05 TO BOREHOLE 05

HEAT PUMP 06 TO BOREHOLE 06 HEAT PUMP 07 TO BOREHOLE 07

MANIFOLD C1 TO HEAT PUMP 09

E

15'-0"

HEAT PUMP 08 TO BOREHOLE 08 HEAT PUMP 09 TO BOREHOLE 09

F

BOREHOLE 03 1200 FEET DEEP

6'-8"

HEAT PUMP 10 TO BOREHOLE 10

10'-4"

G

BOREHOLE 02 1200 FEET DEEP

BOREHOLE 04 1200 FEET DEEP

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H I J K L

MANIFOLD F1 TO HEAT PUMP 05

MANIFOLD E3 TO HEAT PUMP 05

BOREHOLE 05 1200 FEET DEEP

15'-4"

M

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

N O P

BOREHOLE 06 1200 FEET DEEP

MANIFOLD A3 TO HEAT PUMP 03 MANIFOLD D1 TO HEAT PUMP 08

13'-3"

Q BOREHOLE 07 1200 FEET DEEP

MANIFOLD F3 TO HEAT PUMP 10

MANIFOLD E4 TO HEAT PUMP 04

22'-10"

R

BOREHOLE 08 1200 FEET DEEP

S

MANIFOLD E5 TO HEAT PUMP 04

21'-7"

BOREHOLE 09 1200 FEET DEEP

T

MANIFOLD D2 TO HEAT PUMP 06

MANIFOLD D3 TO HEAT PUMP 07

BOREHOLE 10 1200 FEET DEEP

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

RADIANT FLOOR PLAN

M1-01


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

MANIFOLD A1 TO HEAT PUMP 02

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

MANIFOLD A2 TO HEAT PUMP 02

B C D

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

16'-6"

A

15'-0"

E

H

Xref .\M-1.dwg

I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

MANIFOLD F1 TO HEAT PUMP 05

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

MANIFOLD A3 TO HEAT PUMP 03

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE : 1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

RADIANT WALL PLAN

M1-02


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

8

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

12'-10"

12

11

10

13'-1"

13

2'-10" 6'-8"

16

14 15

11'-2"

17

4'-0" 8'-1"

12'-8"

A.H.U EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

16'-6"

A

C D

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

BOREHOLE 09 450 FEET DEEP

9'-11"

A.H.U INTAKE DUCT TO EXTERIOR HEAT PUMP 09 TO BOREHOLE 09

ERV 1 EXHAUST LOUVER

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

B

3 TON AIR HANDLING UNIT TO HEAT PUMP 09

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER

18

ERV INTAKE DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 5 1500 CFM UNIT

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

E

15'-0"

ERV 4 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 3 EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU FRESH AIR LOUVER ERV 4 FRESH AIR LOUVER

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 1 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 4 2000 CFM UNIT

ERV INTAKE DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

I J K L

ERV 4 FRESH AIR LOUVER

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

H

ERV 1 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 4 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 2 EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 3 EXHAUST LOUVER

AHU EXHAUST LOUVER

15'-4" P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

O

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 3 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 1 900 CFM UNIT

ERV 3 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 4 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR ERV EXHAUST DUCT ERV 2 TO EXTERIOR 1500 CFM UNIT

M

N

ERV 3 1500 CFM UNIT

ERV 4 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV FRESH AIR DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV EXHAUST DUCT TO EXTERIOR

ERV 2 FRESH AIR LOUVER

13'-3"

Q BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

BATHROOM VENT STACK - 6" DIAMETER

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER

R

22'-10"

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 2 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER

ERV 5 FRESH AIR LOUVER

ERV 3 EXHAUST LOUVER

ERV 3 FRESH AIR LOUVER

21'-7"

S

ERV 2 EXHAUST LOUVER

ERV 5 EXHUAST LOUVER

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :

1/8" = 1'-0"

DATE :

05/20/2022

VENTILATION PLAN

M1-03


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

16'-6" D

GALVANIZED ALUMNUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" ALUMINUM GUTTER 6" (TYP.) DIAMTER (TYP.)

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

C

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

A

B

8

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM DOWNSLOPING ENCLOSED GUTTER 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

BATHROOM DRAINAGE PIPE - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

15'-0"

E

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

DRAINAGE PLAN

M1-04


1

11'-5"

4

3

2

9'-3"

15'-5"

5

14'-0"

7

6

6'-0"

15'-1"

16'-6" D

GALVANIZED ALUMNUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" ALUMINUM GUTTER 6" (TYP.) DIAMTER (TYP.)

3'-3" 6'-0" 5'-0"

C

5'-11"

9

8'-7"

11

10

12'-10"

13'-1"

12

2'-10" 6'-8"

13

11'-2"

14 15

4'-0" 8'-1"

16

17

12'-8"

18

23'-3"

20

19

21'-6"

9'-11"

ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUT - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

A

B

8

GALVANIZED ALUMINUM DOWNSLOPING ENCLOSED GUTTER 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

BATHROOM DRAINAGE PIPE - 6" DIAMETER (TYP.)

15'-0"

E

H I J K L

3'-4" 2'-2" 9'-6" 2'-11" 8'-6"

10'-4"

G

6'-8"

F

N O P

11'-10" 2'-0" 2'-4"

15'-4"

M

13'-3"

Q

22'-10"

R

21'-7"

S

T

N

AUGUSTA RAURICA WAREHOUSE

AMANDA THISDALE

ARCH 513 INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN STUDIO SPRING 2022 Prof. Roberto Viola Ochoa

SCALE :1/8" DATE :

= 1'-0"

05/20/2022

MECHANICAL AXONOMETRIC

M2-01



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.