International Journal of Energy Science (IJES) Volume 4 Issue 1, February 2014 Doi: 10.14355/ijes.2014.0401.02
www.ijesci.org
Effect of Different Mediator Concentrations on Power Generation in MFC Using Ti‐TiO2 Electrode Ergin Taskan*1, Bestamin Özkaya2, Halil Hasar1 Firat University, Department of Environmental Engineering, Elazıg‐Turkey.
1
Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Environmental Engineering, Istanbul‐Turkey 2
etaskan@firat.edu.tr; bozkaya@yildiz.edu.tr; hhasar@firat.edu.tr Abstract In this study, performance of MFC using three different mediators was investigated in terms of power density and internal resistance. Methylene blue (MB), neutral red (NR) and 2‐hydroxy‐1,4‐naphthoquinone (HNQ)mediators were used to increase power generation in MFC with the mediator concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 μM. The maximum power densities were recorded as 36, 31 and 18.7 mW/m2withthe mediators of MB, NR and HNQ corresponding optimal mediator concentrations of 300, 200 and 50 μM, respectively. Further, it was observed that internal resistance changed with mediator concentration. Keywords Microbial Fuel Cell; Mediator; Ti‐TiO2 Electrode
Introduction Renewable energy requirement has been increased in recent years. Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a new technology used to obtain electricity energy from wastewater. A conventional MFC consisting of anode and cathode compartments, is separated by using a proton exchange membrane from each other. Many types of wastewaters such as synthetic, domestic and industrial wastewaters have been recently tested (He at al., 2005; Huang et al., 2008; Ahn et al., 2009) considering various parameters; such as micro‐ organism growth, electrode materials, membrane‐ electrode assemblies, microbial metabolism, ions’ transportation, bacterial electron transfer, electrons’ mitigation and acceptance for the overall efficiency (Logan, 2007; Armstrong et al., 2000; Habermuller et al., 2000). Another key factor affecting power generation in MFC is electron transfer from microorganism to electrode. Up to now, two mechanisms have been stated; i) direct electron transfer, ii) mediated electron transfer (MET) (UweSchröder, 2007). In previous studies, different mediators were used to increase
power generation in MFC. Methylene blue (Zhou et al., 2007), neutral red (Park et al., 2000), HNQ (Ho et al., 2011) and thionine (Rahimnejad et al., 2012) were used as an electron mediator. Babanova et al. (2011) used methylene blue (MB), methyl orange (MO), bromocresol green (BG), methyl red (MR), neutral red (NR) in MFC and reported that mediator order was BG<NR<MR< MO<MB considering power generation. Similarly, Ho et al. (2011) used 2‐hydroxy‐l,4‐naphthoquinone and thionin as an electron mediator and they recorded that thionin more effective than 2‐hydroxy‐l,4‐ naphthoquinone. In this study, MB, NR and HNQ mediators were utilized to increase power generation in MFC and optimum mediator concentration was determined with the mediator concentration ranges from 50 to 400 μM.
FIG. 1 PICTURE OF LAB SCALE MICROBIAL FUEL CELL (1: Anode Chamber; 2: Proton Exchange Membrane; 3: Cathode Chamber)
Material and Methods In this study, dual chambered MFC was constructed (Fig. 1) with the working anode and cathode chamber volume of 300 ml. Ultrex CMI 7000 (UltrexTM
9