VOLUME 9 ISSUE 10

Page 1

MARCH 18TH - MARCH 25TH, 2013

Website: www.suntci.com

VOLUME 9 - No. 10

Email: sun@suntci.com

Tel: 649-946-8542

Fax: 649-941-3281

$1.00

www. twitter.com/suntci

AMANDA WINS COURT CASE Chief Justice will rule on other MPs cases on April 9th

Amanda Missick, the PNP candidate for the March 22nd by-election in Cheshire Hall/Richmond Hill, sharing a moment with jubilant supporters BY HAYDEN BOYCE PUBLISHER & EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

A

manda Missick won her case in the Supreme Court on Friday March 15th and she will be the Progressive National Party’s (PNP) candidate for the decisive March 22nd by-election in the Cheshire Hall/ Richmond Hill constituency. However, five Members of Parliament: former Chief Minister and AtLarge MP, Derek Taylor (PDM); prominent businesswoman and At-Large MP Josephine Connolly (PDM); businessman and MP for Wheeland, Delroy Williams (PDM); businessman and MP for Grand Turk South, Edwin Astwood (PDM); businessman and MP for Grand Turk North, George Lightbourne (PNP), will have to wait

until April 9th to know whether they are sitting in the House of Assembly illegally and whether they too will have to face by-elections. In a hushed, packed and expectant courtroom, Chief Justice Edwin Goldsbrough sided with legal arguments advanced by her attorney Queen’s Counsel Ariel Misick, who was assisted by his son Jamal Misick, and ruled that Amanda Missick is qualified to run in the by-election which will determine if the PNP retains the government or the balance of power shifts to the PDM. The PNP won the November 9th 2012 general election by a slender 8 to 7 margin, but for the second time in just over four months, Amanda Missick will have to face-off against the PDM’s Oral Selver Missick, who

she defeated by 30 votes (394 to 364) because the seat was declared null and void by High Court Judge Madame Justice Margaret Ramsay-Hale who ruled that the 58 votes received by Dr. Edward Smith of the People Progressive Party (PPP), interfered with the outcome of the election result. The Chief Justice’s ruling in Missick’s favour ended days of legal wrangling and nerve-wracking suspense on the part of officials and supporters from both sides of the political divide. Three cases were originally brought before the Chief Justice. The first was by Oral Selver who claimed that Amanda Missick was disqualified for nomination because of her failure to declare a charge over land

she obtained from the Crown. The second case was by Amanda against Selver claiming that Selver was not qualified because of a Crown lease that Selver had. The third was the case by the Attorney General against Amanda and five MPs claiming that in the case of Amanda she failed to disclose her crown charge in respect of the upcoming by election, and in the case of the others, they failed to disclose Crown charges in respect of the 2012 general elections. When the matter first came before the Chief Justice on Thursday, Amanda and Oral withdrew their respective cases against each other and that left only the case brought CONTINUED ON PAGE 2

VOTE FOR AMANDA MISICK ON FRIDAY MARCH 22ND AND KEEP THE PNP IN GOVERNMENT. THE PNP IS LOOKING OUT FOR YOU! SECURE YOUR FUTURE. LET’S CONTINUE THE PROGRESS TOGETHER. PAID AVERTISEMENT


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.