Vol. 02 Issue 18 Sep 01, 2021
Early Human Migrations from Africa Dating Back 400,000 Years Discovered in Saudi Arabia’s Desert of AlNufud, Reported the Heritage Commission TL Bureau, Riyadh
The Heritage Commission today announced the most recent archaeological discoveries made in the north of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, revealing evidence of early human migrations from Africa to Arabia beginning about 400,000 years ago. The migrations were repeated over multiple time periods dating back 300,000, 200,000, 130,000-75,000 and 55,000 years, representing the longest record of early human presence in Arabia, and underlining the significance of the region in the developments of human civilization outside of Africa. The discoveries were the result of efforts by a Saudi international mission in partnership with specialists from the Heritage Commission, the Max Planck Institute of Germany, King Saud University, and several distinguished international universities and research centers. The archaeological excavation uncovered the remains of stone tools and fossilized animal bones within layers of dry lakes in Al-Nufud desert in the northwest of the Kingdom. At the site of Khall Umayshan, on the outskirts of Tabuk region, artifacts dating back around 400,000 years were found, including Acheulean axes, which are considered the oldest dated archaeological remains in Arabia. Eminent scientific journal Nature has published today, Wednesday, September 1, a study that examined the history of several layers of sediment from the ancient lakes at the sites of Jubbah and Khall Umayshan in the Nufud desert, representing rainy periods experienced by Arabia.
thelifenews.com.au, thelifenews.co
US to host Ukraine at White House
TL Bureau, Washington D.C.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who ended up at the focal point of U.S. governmental issues during previous President Donald Trump’s first arraignment preliminary, will make a hotly anticipated visit to the White House on Wednesday. Zelensky will look for President Joe Biden’s help as Ukraine is buried in continuous battling with Russian-upheld separatists.The two chiefs are booked to hold reciprocal discussions at the White House at 2 p.m. EDT on Wednesday. “This visit will avow the United States’ immovable help for Ukraine’s power and regional trustworthiness notwithstanding Russia’s continuous hostility in the Donbas and Crimea, our nearby collaboration on energy security, and our support for President Zelenskyy’s endeavors to handle debasement and execute a change plan dependent on our common popularity based qualities,” the White House said in an articulation. Battling among Kiev and separatists prompted Russia coercively adding Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, which drew boundless judgment and assents by numerous Western nations, including the United States. Wednesday’s gathering comes following a finished U.S. withdrawal of powers from Afghanistan following a 20-year presence, which has been politically delicate to Biden’s
Courtesy: Xinhuanet organization. “We are altogether different from Afghanistan, and we might want to underline this,” Tymofiy Mylovanov, a consultant to Zelensky’s head of staff, said, as per The New York Times. “We are an autonomous country, not a bombed state, and our military has figured out how to oppose the Russians, not the Taliban.”“We accept this gathering comes at an essential second in the reciprocal relationship as we keep on expanding on ties that tight spot our two nations together and sincerely try to take our essential association to a raised level,” a senior organization official said, as indicated by CNN. At the command of partner Germany this
previous spring, Biden’s administration dropped resistance to the Nord Stream 2 flammable gas pipeline from Russia to Germany, permitting Russia to sidestep Ukraine.It was during a phone call in 2019 that Trump pushed Zelensky to explore now-President Joe Biden, who was a Democratic political adversary at that point. The call detonated into a public embarrassment and prompted Trump’s arraignment, however he was at last absolved in the Republican-held Senate. Zelensky, a foil to Russian President Vladimir Putin, had looked for a little while to the White House since he was chosen for lead the country in 2019.
7 Hong Kong protesters sentenced to prison TL Bureau, Hong Kong
A Hong Kong region court judge on Wednesday condemned seven favorable to popular government dissidents to as long as 16 months in jail for charges coming from an unapproved showing they coordinated in 2019. The dissidents had confessed to the charges identifying with getting sorted out an Oct. 20, 2019, exhibition, which was gone to by countless individuals, some of whom conflicted with police. The dissent was one of many held as a feature of a development that ejected on the previous British province initially against a proposed removal law yet
would develop to wrap more extensive supportive of vote based system objectives in the midst of a police and government crackdown on such occasions. As indicated by court archives, police had denied the coordinators’ proposition to hold an exhibit over feelings of trepidation of savagery, however they went ahead with the plans at any rate while some of them prompted others to partake during a question and answer session. Judge Amanda Woodcock condemned Figo Chan, 25; Leung Kwok-hung, 65; and Albert Ho, 69, to 16 months in jail; Cyd Ho, 67; and Raphael Wong, 32, to 14 months in jail; Avery Ng, 44, to a year
in jail and Yeung Sum, 73, to 11 months. The solitary respondent not at present carrying out a prison punishment was Wong. Woodcock said those generally in a correctional facility are to carry out their punishments simultaneously. “As I have said under the steady gaze of, the Basic Law and the Bill of Rights ensures opportunity of gathering, parade and showing for Hong Kong inhabitants,” Woodcock wrote in her condemning archive. “In any case, these rights are not supreme and are dependent upon limitations administered established. Here, limitations were applied in light of a legitimate concern for public security, public request and the
insurance of others’ privileges and opportunities.” She said the political convictions of the litigants and the reason for the October exhibit were “unimportant to condemning.” Her decision, she said, depends on the way that a portion of those charged held a question and answer session to impel others to go along with them in resisting the police boycott against holding the exhibit and that they had spoke to people in general to “jam pack” the roads. She said that while they required a tranquil dissent, doing as such in the midst of “such unstable occasions” was “basically offering empty talk to the articulation.”