Wahiawa Civic Center Proof of Concept: Phase 3 - Site Considerations

DECEMBER 2020

WAHIAWA CIVIC CENTER

PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY - PHASE 3

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

DRAFT - DECEMBER 4, 2020 PREPARED FOR DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES [DAGS] PREPARED BY UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI COMMUNITY DESIGN CENTER

contents

03

SITE CONSIDERATIONS

19

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES APPROACH 1 APPROACH 2 APPROACH 3 APPROACH 4 APPROACH 5 AGENCY PROGRAM SUMMARY

PROJECT TEAM: CATHI HO SCHAR, AIA Assistant Professor, School of Architecture, Principal Investigator NICOLE BIEWENGA, Research Associate MARK LOMBAWA, Research Associate REBECCA DENZER, Research Associate TREE SOLUTIONS, Arborist SSFM INTERNATIONAL, Civil Feasibility Study JOE UNO & ASSOCIATES, Cost Estimate DAN MILZ, Assistant Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Digital Engagement Consultant

STREET IMPROVEMENTS BLOCK PLAN SKETCH STREET SECTION SKETCH SOCIAL DISTANCING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

47

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES AGENCY OFFICES JUDICIARY PARKING MIX & MATCH 1 MIX & MATCH 2 MIX & MATCH 3

DAWN N. S. CHANG, Esq., Founder, Principal, Kuiwalu, Community Engagement Consultant Students: ANGEL HIU KI AU SHARLA BATOCAL DUSTIN CHANG KAYLEN DAQUIOAG HANA FULGHUM MOISES LIO CAN BEAU NAKAMORI

DISCLAIMER PROOF OF CONCEPT DESCRIBES A SCOPE OF WORK THAT INCLUDES STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, APPLIED RESEARCH, AND CONCEPTUAL PLANNING AND DESIGN INVESTIGATION THAT INFORMS STATE AGENCIES AHEAD OF PROJECT DEFINITION, ANNUAL BUDGET REQUESTS, AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONALS. THESE SERVICES ARE PRELIMINARY AND TYPICALLY INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO A SET OF ANALYSIS, DESIGN SCHEMES, CRITERIA, AND INITIAL COSTS THAT ASSIST WITH CIP JUSTIFICATION AND PROJECT DEFINITION. 2

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Background

The University of Hawai’i Community Design Center (UHCDC) is working for the Department of Accounting and General Services (DAGS) to provide proof of concept engagement, planning, and design services for the redevelopment of the Wahiawa Civic Center. This proof of concept work is intended to inform agencies ahead of procuring professional design teams, and not in lieu of critical professional planning and design services. The project examines the future development of the Wahiawa Civic Center to house incoming civic center spaces and judiciary programs as an opportunity to explore new efficiencies in multi-agency consolidation and to revitalize the town center and improve the urban corridor along California Avenue.

The overall scope for UHCDC includes site analysis, agency alignment, programming, community outreach, proof of concept designs, and preliminary arborist, civil, and electrical studies.

schemes also include public space features that align with stakeholder and community values, that offer potential outdoor areas that would serve the civic center workers and visitors. Again, these are presented for consideration and discussion, and do NOT represent any design decision-making.

Proof of Concept Design

Proof of concept designs represent a unique scope of work that is exploratory and should not be interpreted as design direction or decisions-made. The goals are to provide approaches that support discourse and visualize options that help to support future decision-making.

The professional team is responsible for the design of the actual project.

Design considerations

The design considerations included in this section represent different approaches to site organization based on the feedback received in the alignment, programming, and engagement process, and the arborist and civil reports. They are deliberately different approaches to addressing the street, locating offices and parking, preserving trees, and connecting to the library, transit center, shopping center, and hospital. The

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

3

SITE CONSIDERATIONS

STREET IMPROVEMENTS

WAHIAWA GENERAL HOSPITAL

POST OFFICE

LEHUA STREET

This site plan synthesizes information from the Wahiawa Civic Center Report submitted by SSFM in September 2020, and the Tree Assessment Report submitted by Tree Solutions & Environmental Consulting Services, July 2020, and the 2016 Honolulu Complete Streets study of California Avenue. The site plan highlights improvements to roads, sidewalks, and crosswalks that were recommended for pedestrian safety, enhanced mobility, and ADA accessibility.

WAHIAWA WIC PROGRAM

WAHIAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY

FH

WAHIAWA SHOPPING CENTER

4

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

N CANE STREET

CENTER STREET

STATE OF HAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING OFFICE

WAHIAWA DISTRICT PARK WAHIAWA TRANSIT CENTER

FH

Legend

PROPOSED STREET PLAN 0’

200’

Sidewalk repair and replacement to meet ADA requirements Sidewalk widening per complete streets Existing bike lane Painted bulb-outs by Blue Zones Expanded planter per arborist suggestion New planting Fire hydrant 400’ radius PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

5

SITE CONSIDERATIONS

BLOCK PLAN SKETCH BLOCK PLAN This detailed site plan shows the area where the civic center site and the transit center site interact.

Currently, there are civic center parking spaces accessed by one of the drive-thru lanes in the transit center. Four large openings face the civic center.

EXISTING CIVIC CENTER

6

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

RAMP

237'-9"

PROPERTY LINE

TRANSIT CENTER FOOTPRINT

95'-0"

9'-0"

6'-0"

13'-9"

CALIFORNIA AVENUE PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

7

SITE CONSIDERATIONS

STREET SECTION SKETCH BLOCK SECTIONS These street section sketches indicate the current zoning envelope with respect to the existing Transit Center building and future build-out scenarios for the civic center. Justification would need to be submitted to the City & County for variances. DPP suggested that the project consider the overall tree canopy coverage per the mayor’s initiative, designing an attractive street frontage, and demonstrating positive community benefits related to the variance request.

TRANSIT CENTER

PROPERTY LINE

TOP OF PARAPET WALL

31'-8" 25'-0"

R-5 BUILDING ENVELOPE

TOP OF SECOND FLOOR

6'-0"

30'-0" FRONT SETBACK

Street Section at California Avenue

8

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

5'-0"

3'-6"

9'-0" SIDEWALK

70'-0" CALIFORNIA AVENUE

BLOCK SECTIONS

PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE

PROPERTY LINE

TOP OF PARAPET WALL

TOP OF FIRST FLOOR | 12'-6"

FIRST FLOOR TO BE USED FOR CIVIC USE

12'-6"

R-5 BUILDING ENVELOPE

12'-6"

TOP OF SECOND FLOOR | 25'-0"

PARKING SETBACK TBD 30'-0" FRONT SETBACK

3'-6" 9'-0" SIDEWALK

70'-0" CALIFORNIA AVENUE

Potential Street Section at California Avenue

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

9

10

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES How to use these approaches

Diagrammatic massing studies were generated to support conversation with the agencies about the organization of the site.

These are not representative of designed solutions or agreements. They instead show possible approaches that require more extensive site and planning information, dialogue, and design development.

Key considerations

The approaches were put together with several key considerations in mind based on the engagement with the various stakeholder groups: • Parking strategies • Connectivity to adjacent buildings • Tree removal and replacement • Securable site strategies • Adjacency considerations for agencies • Relationship to Center Street & California Avenue • Budget efficiency

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

11

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES

APPROACH 1

Total Building Area: ~67,000 SF Total Parking Required: 154 spaces, or 129 w/ transit center allocation Total Parking Provided: 147 Spaces

Parking Structure

CTAHR

Total Trees Preserved: 21 Site Approach Strategies: • • • • •

12

Meeting room separate for after-hours use.

Judiciary in a separate building Civic center functions under parking Driver’s License adjacent to the transit center Shared open space closer to the library.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

JUDICIARY

secured fence

DHS WIC

SCH/DLO secured gate secured fence

2

1

1

Small Amphitheater

Amphitheater

2

Eating tables

row of native trees

Eating Tables

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

13

First Floor

Judiciary

secured gate

CTAHR

DHS

PHN

AMHD

secured gate

secured gate

secured judiciary parking secure entry

sally port/ loading

public and staff parking: 135 stalls

parking for CTAHR, road test and loading

secured gate restroom

secured fence meeting room

WIC

14

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

SCH/DLO

TRANSIT CENTER

Second Floor

Judiciary

employee and visitor parking

TRANSIT CENTER

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

15

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES

APPROACH 2

Total Building Area: ~67,000 SF Total Parking Required: 154 spaces, or 129 w/ transit center allocation Total Parking Provided: 145 Spaces

Parking Structure

Total Trees Preserved: 25 Site Approach Strategies: • •

Securable Public Space

secured fence

MTG/RR WIC

JUDICIARY

Judiciary in a separate building.

Hold corners of the site to enclose and secure open space.

AMHD CTAHR secured gate PHN DHS secured fence

16

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

2

row of kou trees

1

1 Family Bench

Mural

Mural

2

Family Benches

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

17

First Floor

MTG/RR

Judiciary

secured gate

SCH/DLO

secured gate

secured judiciary parking

secured gate

sally port/ loading

restroom

mech

secure entry

public and staff parking: 135 stalls

meeting room

parking for CTAHR, Drivers Test

secured gate

DHS van

secured gate

DHS

18

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

PHN

WIC

CTAHR

AMHD

TRANSIT CENTER

Second Floor

Judiciary

employee and visitor parking

TRANSIT CENTER

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

19

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES

APPROACH 3

Total Building Area: ~67,000 SF Total Parking Required: 154 spaces, or 129 w/ transit center allocation Total Parking Provided: 145 spaces

Judiciary Securable Public Space

Total Trees Preserved: 17 Site Approach Strategies: • •

• •

• •

20

Judiciary and state agencies have distinctly separate buildings.

A securable central green space connects the shopping center and general hospital.

Trees in the center of the property remain.

Civic center services are adjacent to the library allowing for more interconnected use.

The parking structure is near the library for shared use.

Parking above state agencies allows for an active ground floor.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Parking Structure

secured fence

PHN/AMHD SCH/DLO

native cluster 3

street row of kou trees

2 1

native cluster

Piko Plaza

Walking Path/Health Path

1

Star Compass

Star Compass

2

Health Path

3

Piko Plaza

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

21

First Floor

AMHD

DHS

PHN CTAHR

Judiciary secured gate

secured gate

sally port/loading

secured judiciary parking

public and staff parking: 135 stalls

secure entry

SCH/DLO

22

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

restroom

meeting room

meeting room

WIC

secured gate

TRANSIT CENTER

Second Floor

Judiciary

employee and visitor parking

TRANSIT CENTER

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

23

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES

APPROACH 4

Total Building Area: ~67,000 SF Total Parking Required: 154 spaces, or 129 w/ transit center allocation Total Parking Provided: 150 spaces Total Trees Preserved: 12 Site Approach Strategies: •

• • • •

24

Activate California Ave. with pedestrian facing storefront access to all agency services.

Minimize setbacks.

Parking structure that can be shared with State Library.

Judiciary on Center street Secure and covered surface parking for Judiciary, Driver’s License road testing, and CTAHR loading access from the Transit Center lane.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

secured gate

JUDICIARY

secured surface parking

Parking Structure

SCH/DLO CTAHR DHS WIC PHN AMHD

secured gate

native specimen tree

row of cherry trees

1 2 3

Planter Seating

Green Screens Wayfinding Hardscape

1

Planter Seating

2

Green Screen

3

Wayfinding Hardscape

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

25

First Floor

Judiciary secured gate public and staff parking: 126 stalls sally port/ loading secure entry

TRANSIT CENTER

secure entry covered secured judiciary parking secured gate

parking for DHS van, CTAHR, road test

restroom mtg room

AMHD

26

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

PHN

WIC

DHS

CTAHR

SCH/DLO

Second Floor

Judiciary

public and staff parking: 126 stalls

employee and visitor parking

TRANSIT CENTER

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

27

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES

APPROACH 5

Total Building Area: ~67,000 SF Total Parking Required: 154 spaces, or 129 w/ transit center allocation Total Parking Provided: 150 spaces Total Trees Preserved: 14 Site Approach Strategies: • • • • •

28

Consolidated footprint to respond to budget constraints.

A parking structure near State Library Civic Services along California Ave. Courthouse functions on the top two floors.

2nd-floor state agency services are accessed directly from the parking lot.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Parking Structure

JUDICIARY

DHS SCH/DLO

3

2

native cluster

1

row of kou street trees

Demonstration Garden

1

Demonstration Garden

Timeline Fence

2 Timeline Fence

Native Tree Grove

3

Native tree grove

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

29

First Floor

public and staff parking: 135 stalls secured judges and adnim parking

surface parking for road test

TRANSIT CENTER

sally port/ loading

Judiciary

CTAHR

WIC

SCH/DLO

Second Floor

public and staff parking: 135 stalls

TRANSIT CENTER

Judiciary

30

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

DHS

PHN

AMHD

Third Floor

public and staff parking: 135 stalls

TRANSIT CENTER

Judiciary

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

31

SITE PROGRAMMING APPROACHES

AGENCY PROGRAM SUMMARY AMHD

WIC

PHN

Full-Time Employees: 6

Full-Time Employees: 9

Full-Time Employees: 14

Visitors / Day: 6

Visitors / Day: 80-100

Visitors / Day: 20-50

Visitors / one time: -

Visitors / one time: 12

Visitors / one time: 5-10

Existing: 1,707 SQFT

Existing: 1,056 SQFT

Existing: 1,250 SQFT

Proposed: See DAGS Program

Proposed: See DAGS Program

Proposed: See DAGS Program

Site Considerations:

Site Considerations:

Site Considerations:

• Clients can pose a safety risk, need to be somewhat separate from other agencies • Accessible and secure parking in front of the office for clients • Larger waiting room • Outdoor waiting area • Larger meeting rooms • Concerns over homeless in the area • Provide separate public restrooms

32

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

• Minimize walking distance, put next to parking and transit • Prefer to be on the ground floor • Would prefer to be further away from AMHD

• Increased security • Provide flexible meeting rooms for community education and outreach • Provide separate public restrooms • Ensure space is within ADA compliance

DHS

CTAHR

SCH / DLO

JUDICIARY

Full-Time Employees: 25

Full-Time Employees: 5

Full-Time Employees: 8

Full-Time Employees: 42

Visitors / Day: 36-41

Visitors / Day: 6

Visitors / Day: 300-375

Visitors / Day:

Visitors / one time: 2-3

Visitors / one time: 1-2

Visitors / one time: 15

Visitors / one time:

Existing: 3,425 SQFT

Existing: 1,217 SQFT

Existing: N/a

Existing: N/a

Proposed: See DAGS Program

Proposed: See DAGS Program

Proposed: See DAGS Program

Proposed: See DAGS Program

Site Considerations:

Site Considerations:

Site Considerations:

Site Considerations:

• Designate a parking space for handicap/handi-vans • Ensure ADA compliance for wheelchairs and strollers

• Need to be located close to vehicle unloading area to have direct access into the storage • Provide flexible space for education programs and outreach • Provide space for a demonstration garden. If secured and enclosed, CTAHR can manage and steward.

• Provide adequate restrooms

• Need to be adjacent to parking for road test vehicles on ground floor • Provide accessible and free parking

• Need accessible visitor parking • See separate secure parking issues above - no exposure to rooftop shooters.

• No public parking or access above the judiciary building • Need secure entry points • Secure entry/exit for custody transport no reversing into the street.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

33

Kapa Patterns *Meanings of Kapa are interpretations specific to the designer. The meanings/information of some hundred known stamps and patterns have been lost. But some patterns/shapes are interpreted similarly.

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

HARDSCAPE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

FAMILY/GENERATION:​ Each triangle represents a generation and also indicates moving forward and progress.​1

WAI:​ Water can be interpreted in many different ways (ocean, freshwater, spring water, aquifers, etc). Typically indicated with linear patterns. 2​

HALE: ​Typically indicated with an upright triangle/arrow​3

Kapa Patterns •

The meaning of kapa pattern is often specific to the designer. However, some patterns and shapes are interpreted similarly.

To the right we’ve explored different patterns that relate to a few of the themes that emerged in the community engagement: family, multigenerations, community togetherness and connection to agriculture and heritage.

Hale:

Typically indicated with a upright triangles. (see Pattern A) 1

Family / Generation:

Kapa Patterns *Meanings of Kapa are interpretations specific to the designer. The meanings/information of some hundred repeated series ofknown stamps and patterns have been lost. But some patterns/shapes are interpreted similarly.

Pattern FAMILY/GENERATION:​ EachAtriangle represents a generation and also indicates moving forward and progress.​1

Each triangle represents a generation and also indicates moving forward and progress. (see Pattern B)2 WAI:​ Water can be interpreted Pattern Bin many different ways (ocean, freshwater, spring water, aquifers, etc). Typically indicated with linear patterns. 2​

Connection to Agricultural History: 1

https://lydgatefarms.com/kapa-story/

Historic images of patterns created by fields https://lydgatefarms.com/kapa-story/ https://www.manaolahawaii.com/our-prints/ are abstracted and used as inspiration for pattern making. (see Image C)3 2 3

HALE: ​Typically indicated with an upright triangle/arrow​3

Image C

1 2 3

https://lydgatefarms.com/kapa-story/ https://lydgatefarms.com/kapa-story/ https://www.manaolahawaii.com/our-prints/

Pattern developed for the Wahiawa Civic Center Site 1 Manaola Yap, https:// www.manaolahawaii. com/our-prints, 2020 2 Sabra Kauka, patterns developed for Lydgate Family Farm https:// lydgatefarms.com/kapastory, 2020 3 https://uhmagis. maps.arcgis.com/ apps/webappviewer/ index, 1964.

34

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Pattern developed as hardscape

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

35

Connecting to Piko •

Kukaniloko is an important Native Hawaiian cultural site. It’s location and it’s role as the piko of the island of Oahu is referenced in the hardscape pattern’s orientation.

Kukaniloko Birth Stones

Connecting to Piko

36

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

RA US DI

WAHIAWA GENERAL HOSPITAL

TO KA KU

LEHUA STREET

KO

N CANE STREET

LO NI CENTER STREET

STATE OF HAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING OFFICE

WAHIAWA TRANSIT CENTER

WAHIAWA WIC PROGRAM

WAHIAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY

CALIFORNIA AVENUE

WAHIAWA SHOPPING CENTER

0

Arc of circle with origin point at Kukaniloko informs hardscape

As the piko of O’ahu, Kukaniloko is traced on the site.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

37

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

SOCIAL DISTANCING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Social Distancing Diagrams: •

38

Social distancing design considerations were generated based on a literature review of other physical distancing manuals that were released in the Summer of 2020. Selected considerations that aligned with the project, site, and climate were identified and vetted first by the agencies and then the general public in the Open House Walkthru.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Separate Entrances Separate entrances and and Exits exits

Automatic doors and hand Hand Sanitizers at entry points sanitizers

Outdoor Workspace Outdoor workspace with with Internet internet

Operable Windows Operable windows

Indoor/Outdoor Openings Indoor/outdoor openings

Social distancing Distancing markers Markers Social

Open-air Open-airStairs stairs

Flexible/Expandable Flexible/expandable Conferencerooms Rooms conference

Plexiglass PlexiglassatatReception reception

Open-air circulation + Open-air Circulation + Waiting waiting area

Clear ClearWayfinding wayfindingDevices devices

Outdoor waiting Waiting Area Outdoor area PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

39

40

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES Sketches

These sketches utilize ‘Site Approach 4’ from the previous sections of this report and explores three different architectural approaches to the three different building types, the parking garage, Judiciary building, and Agency Offices building. These again are only quick sketches intended to support dialogue and vet preferences that will inform the future design of the architectural components in this project.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

41

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

AGENCY OFFICES

Arcade

Undulating Storefront

Conventional Storefront

42

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

43

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

JUDICIARY

Cantilevered Layers

3 Houses

Single House

44

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

45

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

PARKING

Staggered Screens

Partial Wrap

Full wrap, with “windows” in screen.

Civic center on ground floor.

46

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

47

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

APPROACH 1

Considerations: •

Shaded arcade along California Ave. contributes to walkability

•

Securable interior courtyard area

•

Lifted mass of judiciary building provides outdoor waiting area

Aerial View of Site in Context 48

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

49

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

View from California Street

50

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

View from Interior Courtyard

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

51

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

APPROACH 2

Considerations: •

Glazing creates a ‘storefront’ facade along California Ave. providing transparency and activating the CA corridor

•

Pitched roofs and low profile massing integrates into site context

•

Conection from the transit center through the civic center to the proposed library via the securable civic center interior courtyard

Aerial View of Site in Context 52

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

53

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

View from California Street

54

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

View from Interior Courtyard

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

55

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACHES

APPROACH 3

Considerations: •

Highly visible entrance point

•

Outdoor shaded seating areas in enclosed courtyard area

•

Facade along California Ave creates connectivity to the street scape

Aerial View of Site in Context 56

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

57

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

View from California Street

58

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

These approaches are not final designs in any way.

They are visualizations that are only meant to generate discourse.

View from Interior Courtyard

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

59

SITE CONSIDERATIONS

CIVIC SPACE SENSE OF PLACE These Public Space Features were developed in response to ideas offered in conversations with stakeholders throughout our talk stories. They were then vetted with DAGS Property Management for maintenance feasibility.

Mini Marketplace Marketplace Mini Promenade Promenade

Berm Seating Berm Seating

Wayfinding Hardscape Wayfinding Hardscape

Wayfinding Signage Wayfinding Signage

Natural Benches Natural Benches

Civic Stairs

Community Tables Community Tables

Eating Tables Eating Tables

Civic Stairs 60

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Timeline Fence

Participation Wall Participation Wall

Memorial Wall Memorial Wall

Wellness Courtyard

Green Screens Green Screens

Play Area Play Area

Star Compass

Sun Dial Sun Dial

Small Amphitheater Small Amphitheater

Timeline Fence

Wellness Courtyard

Star Compass

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

61

62

Soft Piko

Soft Piko

Mural Mural

Interactive Sculpture Interactive Sculpture

Ohana Bench Ohana Bench

Bike BikeStation Stationwith with Seating Seating

Rain Garden Rain Garden

LowMaintenance Maintenance Low Waiting Area Waiting Area

Public Theatre Public Theater

Demonstration Garden Demonstration Garden

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Piko Plaza

Piko Plaza

Piko Circle Piko Circle

Performance Stage Performance Stage

Planter Table Planter Table

Health Walking Path Health Walking Path

Planter Seating Planter Seating

Demonstration Garden Demonstration Garden

Drive Through Drive Thru

ResilienceHub Hub Drive Drive Resilience Through Thru PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

63

Outdoor Game Room

Medicinal Garden

Urban Rain Garden

Local Inspired Seating

Multi-generation Bench

Defined Hardscape

Tree Stump Garden Steps

Rock Wall Planters

Tree Stump Seating

64

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Reflective Space

Breezeway

Kupukupu Garden

Meditation Garden

Native Tree Grove

Mini-Amphitheater with Rock Mound

Wahiawā Civic Center

Perimeter Wall

Signage Wall

Family Bench

PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

65

SITE CONSIDERATIONS

CIVIC SPACE VALUES MATRIX In this matrix, the public space features are cross-referenced with the community values that came up in the community survey.

lic

y et af

S

b

y&

Pu

rit

u ec

S

C

To

u

m

om

ty ni

r

he

t ge

e

s en

S

el

e ac

n

-

ily

m Fa

y dl

ie fr

l fP

o

Soft Piko Family Bench Mural Plantation Facade Kupukupu Garden Demonstration Garden Participation Wall Drive Thru Piko Circle Walking/Health Path Signage Wall Amphitheatre Eating Tables Star Compass Piko Plaza Planter Seating Green Screen Wayfinding Hardscape Timeline Fence Native Tree Grove Marketplace Promenade Berm Seating Memorial Wall Wayfinding Signage Local Inspired Seating 66

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

p Ku

t

ity

en

v En

iro

nm

om

y

m

m

Co

un

n

tio

ea cr

Fe

ge

a rit

e ik e n th Re He Ke th co n d s i r r ’ E n n fo fo a ity tio wa ng g g ia rs lth ca in in ivi e h a r r u r v a Ca Th Ca Di He Ed W

wn to

l-

al

Sm

d

n ia

Community Values Perimeter Wall

a

un

ss ne

lic

y et af

S

b

y&

Pu

rit

u ec

S

C

To

u

m

om

ty ni

r

he

t ge

e

s en

S

el

e ac

n

-

ily

m Fa

y dl

ie fr

a

t

un

ss ne l fP

o

ity

en

iro

nm

v En

om

y

m

m

Co

un

n

tio

ea cr

Fe

ge

a rit

e ik e n th Re He Ke th co n d s i r r ’ E n n fo fo a ity tio wa ng g g ia rs lth ca in in ivi e h a r r u r v a Ca Ca W Ed Th Di He

wn to

l-

al

Sm

d

n ia

p Ku

Community Values Wellness Courtyard Play Area Civic Stairs Community Tables Sun Dial Interactive Sculpture Performance Stage ʻOhana Bench Bike Station with Seating Rain Garden Planter Table Waiting Area Public Theatre Resilience Hub Drive Outdoor Game Room Medicinal Garden Defined Hardscape Meditation Garden Rock Mound Gathering Tree Stump Seating Tree Stump Garden Step Rock Wall Planters Reflective Space Breezeway Natural Benches Multi-generation Bench PHASE 3- DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

67