3 Manzere Street, Industrial Park, Shayandima Tel: 015 964 1042 | Cell: 066 349 3876 www.trutombstones.co.za www.limpopomirror.co.za
16B Joubert Street, Louis Trichardt Tel: (015) 516 4996/7/8 Audited Bureau of Circulation
22 April 2022 Year 32 Vol: 32
R5,00 VAT Inc.
BEST-SELLING LOCAL NEWSPAPER IN LIMPOPO ISSN 2409-6784
Khubvi’s bottle and tin collector murdered - page 3
BB LOUIS TRICHARDT
Car of suspected criminals torched by angry mob - page 3
Wife killed, husband injured during “bloody” Easter - page 4
32
9 772409 678005
NOW OPEN 141 KROGH STREET | 015 516 0294
Kingship battle hits another snag By Elmon Tshikhudo and Anton van Zyl
Mavhungu David Mphephu, better known as Vho-Japan, was appointed as the regent or temporary king of the Vhavenda earlier this year, but his appointment is being disputed.
The appointment of Mavhungu David Mphephu (better known as Vho-Japan) as acting king of the Vhavenda may not proceed as smoothly as some might wish. One of the main contenders for the kingship position, princess Masindi Mphephu, has written to the premier of the province and objected against this appointment. One of the reasons put forward is that David Mphephu is not a “suitable” candidate because he has, among other things, lied under oath. At the end of February this year, the Ramabulana royal family announced that Vho-Japan was elected during a meeting to serve as acting leader of the Vhavenda. “He is the most suitable candidate in the family, taking into consideration his age and his experience in traditional governance. He has been around for some time, and we have no doubt he will lead this nation and family with distinction, until such time the court case is finalised,” the family representative said.
MADE FOR
SHARING LIMITED EDITION
Images for illustrative purposes only.
The case that is being referred to is the long-standing court battle between Masindi Mphephu and Toni Mphephu Ramabulana. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) referred the matter back to the High Court (HC). An attempt by Toni Mphephu Ramabulana to get the Constitutional Court (CC) to overturn the SCA’s ruling failed last year. The appointment of an acting king must be ratified by the Premier, a process that has seemingly not been finalised yet. Last week, Masindi’s legal representatives wrote a letter to the Premier in which they dispute the legality and wisdom of making such an appointment.
“He is not a suitable candidate” In the letter to the Premier, Masindi’s lawyers argue that history has shown that Vho-Japan is not a suitable candidate to be appointed in such a position as required by the relevant legislation. One of the complaints is that, during the
Vho-Japan is not a suitable candidate because he lied under oath, claims Masindi family meeting on 14 August 2010, he had been very outspoken against the appointment of a woman as ruler, stating that such a position could only be occupied by a male. During this meeting, Toni was elected as candidate for the position of king. The central focusing point of Masindi’s objection, however, concerns sworn affidavits made by Vho-Japan in support of Toni’s court case to be appointed as king of the Vhavenda. Masindi’s lawyers argue that he had committed perjury and should not be considered for the appointment. In August 2020, Vho-Japan filed an opposing affidavit, in reply to an affidavit filed by Masindi in July that year. One of the issues raised in the case was Toni’s involvement in the VBS Mutual Bank scandal. At the time, he was mentioned as a person of interest in the Motau
report that alleged that around R17 million had found its way to Toni Mphephu. Vho-Japan, in his affidavit, denied that Toni was a suspect and that he was being investigated. “The Royal family can confirm that the First Applicant [Toni Mphephu] is not a suspect in any investigations or at risk of being arrested for the crimes committed against VBS. His representations in this regard were found satisfactory by the South African Reserve Bank and the relevant law enforcement officials,” the statement reads. Masindi’s lawyers filed papers in the CC proving that this is not true, and that Toni had not been “cleared” by any of the institutions mentioned. (Continues on page 3)