Curator Council Mário Santos Moreira - President - ICC Alejandro Marcel Hasslocher Moreno - IPEC Christian Maurice Gabriel Niel – IOC Francisco Inácio Pinkusfeld Monteiro Bastos - ICICT Juliano de Carvalho Lima – Direh Sergio Munck Machado - EPSJV Valeria Morgana Penzine Goulart - ENSP
Statutory Audit Committee Luiz Antonio de Araújo - President – Farmanguinhos Gilvan Ferreira - Dirad Maria Helena Magalhães - ENSP
Executive Board Adolfo Horacio Chorny – Executive Director - ENSP Geandro Ferreira Pinheiro – Administrative Director - Diplan Beatriz de Castro Fialho - Financial Director – Bio-Manguinhos Mansur Ferreira Campos – Technical Director - VPPIS
General Management Mário Dias Rodrigues
Summary 1- Institutional Information Mission, Vision & Values Administrative Structure Operational Structure Organization Chart 2- Activities Quantity of Projects Managed Funding Agencies
3 - Management of Budgeting and Funding Resources Operation of Project Funds Historic Data Proprietary Resources
1. INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION
Mission To render technical and administrative assistance in projects developed by Fiocruz, in the fields of science, technology and innovation, and to act as Social Organization (SO) in projects that include basic health care and promotion, hospital management and learning, in Fiocruz’ partnerships with Governmental bodies.
Vision To overcome, each day, the quality of our activities, processes and competences and reach excellence as support foundation, in order to enable technical innovation in healthcare and qualification of the concerned human resources, contributing for enhancement of society’s life quality.
Values Integrity, Transparency, Efficiency and Ethics.
Administrative Structure Fiotec is formed by a Board of Trustees, with seven members, and by an Audit Council, with three members. Administration is performed by the Executive Directory, formed by four directors – Executive, Administrative, Financial and Technical , supported by a General management and by the administrative and technical sectors managements.
Operational Structure In order to fully accomplish its mission, Fiotec needs to have a structure compliant with the volume and complexity of the supported projects. In 2010, even with the productivity accomplishments, enhancing the infrastructure conditions – mainly in the Information Technology area , a major growth has been observed in the number of employees due to the reach of the special projects managed after the foundation’s qualification as Social Organization (SO). In the past, there were 189 stakeholders contracted in administration – 31% variation compared to the 144 active ones in 2009. In addition, 3,984 professionals worked specifically in development projects, 785% more than then 450 ones contracted in 2009.
Projects Management The number of new projects started along the year was 186, corresponding to 44% more than in 2009, when the number was 129 projects. To face such growth, personnel qualification was enhanced and several changes were made to the processes aiming to provide adequate answer to the expectations. Special Projects Management The department was created in August, 2010, aiming to coordinate the projects developed by Fiocruz, in partnership with the Rio de Janeiro State Health and Civil Defense Secretariat (SESDEC) and the Rio de Janeiro City Health and Civil Defense Secretariat (SMSDC), after qualification as Social Organization. Projects are classified in two blocks: The first one, comprised by Teias project with its 18 subÂprojects, has research and training as its main axes; and the second one, comprised by the hospital projects, which aims at the personnel management of the hospital and primary health care units. Personnel Management (Human Resources) The team was responsible for management of more than 4 thousand stakeholders, staff seven times larger than in 2009, when there were about 600 contracted employees. In the entirety, 4,466 hires and 887 dismissals were carried out. Such increase results from Fiocruz’ projects management in partnership with the health secretariats. The average monthly pays carried out was 6,403, amounting to 76,836 pays, more than twice the figures from the former year. Logistics Management Likewise across Fiotec as a whole, the department recorded significant growth in the year 2010, reflected in the number of generated requests: from 7,799 in 2009 to 11,469 requests this year, equivalent to 47% increase. Controlling Management The number of documents received in the Accounts Payable was 33,725, 19.7%
more than the 28,166 received in 2009. Total clearances in the Accounts Payables went from 7,350 to 9,562, corresponding to 30.1% increase. Payments carried out by the Treasury went from 51,384 to 63,429 (23.4% variation). As for the quantity of payments made by Comex to other countries increased by 34.4%, going from 180 to 242. In the Accounting, Tax and Equity, the number of entries made went from 14,261 to 18,923 (32.7% increase).
Information Technology (IT) Management Several actions were put in place aiming to improve the foundation’s performance concerning access to information, among them we have SAP (Systems, Applications and Products for Data Processing) release update, in the Human Resources Department, and continuation of system customization. SAP also enabled creation of interfaces to the Coordinators Statement and Free Cash, at Fiotec’s website. Legal Advisory Implementation of a new system in the intranet allowed more accurate identification of demands location and the attorney in charge for it, enabling fast answers that may generate information for decision taking. The hardcopy proceedings files of the processes were digitalized, thus allowing access to the documents through the system, reducing the occupied physical space, attaining savings from photocopies and reducing the use of paper. Technical Advisory The Communication sector of Fiotec has been formed, in charge of creating, planning and monitoring a communication plan for internal and external disclosure of information. Added to such strategy, a new identity for “Fiotec Solidária” (Solidary Fiotec), an internal action aimed at fostering solidary campaigns towards the communities and other organizations from the third sector, has been created. Report for certification in the National Social Assistance Council – CNAS shall be rendered in 2011. Verification of the information requested by MEC and MCTI for re registration as support foundation has been started.
Organization Chart
Board of Trustees
Tax Board
Executive Directory
General Management
Legal Advisory
Projects Management
Special Projects Management
Technical Advisory
Personnel Management
Main Projects Office
HR Services Center
ENSP Projects Office
RH Management
Bio-Manguinhos Projects Office Global Fund Office
Logistics Management
Archive
Procurement Procurement Follow-up Registration and Contracts General Services
Controlling Magement Accounting Management Financial management
IT Management
Infrastructure
Information Systems
2 - ACTIVITIES
Quantity of managed projects In 2010, Fiotec administered 388 projects in total, from which 186 started along the year. The following graphic shows the historic evolution, adding the number of new projects being performed with the total accumulated until the former year.
1400 1260
1300 1200 1074 1100 945
1000 900
829
800
719 News Projects
700
Accumulated Total
600
517
500
409
400
301
300
202
200 100
163 138
124
85
24 24
24 48
37
39
39
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
108
186 110
108
116
129
0 2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Funding Agencies The main funding agencies of projects executed by the various technical足 scientific and technical足administrative units of Fiocruz, by means of Fiotec, are represented in the following graph by the relative percentage of the funding:
SMS足RJ 22.18%
GLOBAL FUND WESTAT PETROBRAS 1.31% NIH 1.46% OPAS CRP 001% FINEP 1.79% 1.49% 001% CDC 0.72% 0.81% OTHERS NATIONAL 3.34% OTHERS INTERNATIONAL 1.15%
FIOCRUZ 28.65%
SES足RJ 35.14%
3 - Management of Budgeting and Funding Resources Operation of Project Funds The volume of resources captured by projects in the year 2010, amounted to R$ 413.109 million. To these were added R$ 4.368 million obtained from the interest on financial investments. In the following chart we demonstrate the total collected per Fiocruz unit. The accompanying graphic highlights the percentage composition of resources collected according to the unit:
UNIT BIO CECAL COC CPQLMD DIPLAN DIRAD DIREB DIREH ENSP EPSJV FAR ICC ICICT ICPQAM ICPQGM ICPQRR IFF INCQS IOC IPEC PRES VPAAPS VPDIGT VPEIC VPPDT VPPIS VPPLR VPSRA
AGREEMENT VALUE MR$ 2,500 2,594 247 65 11 170 102 299 251
CONTRACTS VALUE MR$ 25,857 73 528 337 148 131 1,656 23 100,176 889 15,435 1,450 6,136 1,201 258 917 9,583 404 10,542 13,836 14,689 1,903 192,440 1,566 439 6,258
TOTAL 6,238 406,871 TOTAL COLLECTED WITH AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS TOTAL REVENUE FROM INVESTMENT SUBTOTAL TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FIOTEC TOTAL TAF RETURNED UNITS TOTAL OTHES UNITS
REVENUE FROM INVESTMENT VALUE MR$ 2,096 1 0 821 109 36 24 5 1 19 14 20 305 436 40 384 1 49 6 0 4,368
TOTAL VALUE MR$ 30,453 73 529 337 148 131 1,656 23 103,590 1,245 15,535 1,450 6,160 1,217 259 937 9,767 526 11,146 14,271 14,980 1,903 192,824 1,566 49 445 6,258
% 7.29% 0.02% 0.13% 0.08% 0.04% 0.03% 0.40% 0.01% 24.81% 0.30% 3.72% 0.35% 1.48% 0.29% 0.06% 0.22% 2.34% 0.13% 2.67% 3.42% 3.59% 0.46% 46.19% 0.38% 0.01% 0.11% 1.50%
417,477 413,109 4,368 417,477 (17,821) 892 400,548
4.27% 0.21% 4.06%
12,491
2.99%
TP OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT
OT OT OT OT
100% [+] [+] [=] [] [+] [=]
VPDIGT 46.18%
VPSRA 1.49%
OTHERS UNITS 2.99% BIO 7.29%
PRES 3.58% IPEC 3.41%
ENSP 24.81% IOC 2.67%
IFF 2.34%
ICICT 1.47%
FAR 3.72%
The chart below presents distribution of resources according to the main business instruments used in Fiotec. The accompanying graphic highlights the percentage composition of resources collected according to the project’s modality: TYPE
VALUE MR$
%
LIV CAC CFA FDI FPR INO SPR
399,519 7,352 54 2,602 370 3,212
96.71% 1.78% 0.01% 0.63% 0.09% 0.78%
TOTAL
413,109
100%
LIV project in the contract mode of service to run as its own regulation of Fiotec; CAC project that follows the rules the same or similar rules of the letters of agreement partners such as PAHO, UNDP; CFA – projects with features of agreement that follow the rules the same or similar rules contract financing actives of UNESCO, UNODC; FDI – exclusive to the agreements with FINEP; FPR – covenants are governed solely by IN/01, including letters of agreement with intervention SGTES PAHO INO – covenants are governed solely by IN/01, including letters of agreement with intervention SGTES PAHO ; SPR – covenants running with only in auction.
CAC 1.78%
CFA 0.01%
FDI 0.63% FPR 0.09% INO 0.78%
LIV 96.71%
The following chart and graphic display the historic evolution of Fiotec’s revenues in the period from 1998 to 2010, according to the project’s modality: RESOURES COLLECTED EVOLUTION IN AMOUNTS MR$ 19982010 Source
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Contract
560
1,325
3,231
5,625
11,060
20,759
72,187
97,653
83,094
110,394
194,868
197,618
406,871
Agreements
263
329
1,029
995
4,509
13,365
10,233
19,141
13,779
19,792
11,742
4,251
6,238
Others
344
641
814
3,008
3,246
9,485
14,631
4,527
3,884
3,946
4,880
3,221
4,368
Total
1,167
2,295
5,074
9,628
18,815
43,609
97,051
121,321
100,757
134,132
211,490
205,090
417,477
EVOLUTION IN PERCENTAGE % 19982010 Source
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Contract
47.99
57.73
63.68
58.42
58.78
47.60
74.38
80.49
82.47
82.30
92.14
96.36
97.46
Agreements
22.54
14.34
20.28
10.33
23.96
30.65
10.54
15.78
13.68
14.76
5.55
2.07
1.49
Others
29.48
27.93
16.04
31.24
17.25
21.75
15.08
3.73
3.85
2.94
2.31
1.57
1.05
Total
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
GRAPHIC IN PERCENTAGE 19982010
100,0 90,0 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 ,0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Contrato
Convênio
Others
100.00
EVOLUTION OF THE COLLECTED RESOURCES 1998 2010
1998
Value in MR$ 1,167
% Growth in relation to the previous year
1999
2,295
97%
2.0
2000
5,074
121%
4.3
2001
9,628
90%
8.3
2002
18,815
95%
16.1
2003
43,609
132%
37.4
2004
97,051
123%
83.2
2005
121,321
25%
104.0
2006
100,757
17%
86.3
2007
134,132
33%
114.9
2008
211,490
58%
181.2
2009
205,090
3%
175.7
2010
417,477
104%
357.7
Year
Growth in relation to the year 1998
GRAPHIC IN MR$
400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Proprietary Resources The following chart and graphics present Statement of Result with the graphics of the revenue and expenses values for 2010: BALANCE SHEET
TOTAL 2010
DESCRIPTION
VALUE MR$
%
17,821
77.59%
(892)
3.88%
16,928
73.71%
48
0.21%
FINANCIAL INCOME
4,883
21.26%
OTHER INCOME
1,108
4.83%
22,967
100.00%
INCOME [administrations fees] [] TRANSFER [taf] [] ISS NET INCOME REVERTING PROVISIONS
TOTAL INCOME
DESCRIPTION
VALUE MR$
%
(6,741)
34.80%
(220)
1.13%
SOCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
(1,442)
7.45%
TOTAL SAL + CONTRIBUTIONS
(8,403)
MATERIAL AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES
(1,399)
43.39% 7.22%
UTILITIES AND SERVICES
(5,305)
27.39%
OCCASIONAL EXPENSES
(3,285)
16.96%
EXPENSES WITH PROVISIONS
(221)
1.14%
TAX EXPENSES
(34)
0.17%
FINANCIAL EXPENSES
(721)
3.72%
COUNTERPART STOCK
(0)
0.00%
TOTAL EXPENSES
(19,369)
100.00%
SURPLUS / DEFICIT IN THE PERIOD
3,598
EXPENSES WITH PERSONAL OWN EXPENSES WITH PERSONAL – THIRD PARTIES
The following chart and graphic display the historic evolution of Fiotec’s revenues and expenses in the period from 1998 to 2010: 1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Revenues
116
155
434
867
1,475
3,222
5,085
7,632
6,476
8,754
14,031
13,170
22,967
Expenses
62
163
375
836
1,481
2,122
4,636
5,310
6,399
8,199
13,922
13,571
19,369
Balance
54
(8)
59
31
(6)
1,100
449
2,322
77
555
109
(401)
3,598
53%
105.2%
86.4%
96.4%
100.4%
65.9%
91.2%
69.6%
98.8%
93.7%
99.2%
103.0%
84.3%
Specification
%E/R
EVOLUTION OF THE COLLECTED RESOURCES 1998 足 2010 Value in R$ thousand 116
% Growth in relation to the previous year
Growth in relation to the year 1998
1999
155
34
1.3
2000
434
180
3.7
2001
867
100
7.5
2002
1,475
70
12.7
2003
3,222
118
27.8
2004
5,085
58
43.8
2005
7,632
50
65.8
2006
6,476
15
55.8
2007
8,754
35
75.5
2008
14,031
60
121
2009
13,170
6
113.5
2010
22,967
74
198
Year
GRAPHIC IN MR$
250
200
150
100
50
0 1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010