a. The Report from Iron Mountain

Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of the smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organised political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.

-Albert Einstein

Before we delve into the facts surrounding the real reason why there was a civil war in the United States, where our citizens slaughtered each other at the amusement of the Illuminati, we are going to jump forward to the 1960’s, when a paper entitled “The Report From Iron Mountain” was published in 1967.

The report is basically a summarization and analysis of how wars over the millennia have been used to control and steer societies, and what kinds of actions, including and besides wars, need to be taken by the proponents of the Great Plan in the future to bring the Plan to completion.

Although the details of the origin of the report are intentionally murky, in all probability it was commissioned by Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara during the Kennedy administration and produced by the Hudson Institute, a Tavistock-affilitated think tank, at the base of Iron Mountain in New York. The Hudson Institute was founded and directed by Herman Kahn of the Rand Corporation, the same Rand we already reviewed, with both Kahn and McNamara of course being members of the Council on Foreign Relations, taking marching orders directly from the Illuminati.

The stated purpose of the report was to propose ways to “stabilize society”. Now, that all sounds fine and dandy, until you read the report and find the word “society” used synonymously with “global government”, and the word “stabilize” actually meaning to facilitate. The entire purpose of this report was to formulate a new game plane for the Illuminati and their bought-and-paid-for minions to execute.

241

The gist of the report is that in mankind’s past the fabric holding society together with a common purpose was the omnipresent threat of war and tribulation. Mankind needed to be held constantly on the edge of war with either real or imagined enemies. Only during these times would mankind bear the load of an ever-growing, larger centralized government controlled by the members of the occult secret societies. In times of peace, man would become resentful of the largesse and intentionally wasteful habits of big government for the benefit of the few pulling the strings.

According to the report, war or threat of war has always been a required condition for a “stabilized society”, with stabilized of course meaning under the control of the members of the Great Plan. These are the report’s exact words:

“The war system not only has been essential to the existence of nations as independent political entities, but has been equally indispensable to their stable political structure. Without it, no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence in it “legitimacy,” or right to rule its society. The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power. The historical record reveals one instance after another where the failure of a regime to maintain the credibility of a war threat led to its dissolution, by the forces of private interest, of reactions to social injustice, or of other disintegrative elements. The organization of society or for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer….it has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinction, and it has insured the subordination of the citizens to the state by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood.”

The report also theorizes that we are approaching a point in the history of man where war may no longer be necessary, as all the pieces were beginning to come together for “everlasting peace” via a one world government.

Per the report’s recommendations, all nations are to be disarmed, including the U.S., and will come under the military “protection” of the one world government through the United Nations’ one world army. The report explicitly states: “The word ‘peace’, as we have used it in the following

pages….implies total and general disarmament.”

Under this scenario, independent, sovereign nations will no longer exist and governments will be stripped of any and all means of conducting war or aggression.

The report then goes on to ponder what can take the place of war as a uniting force for society. According to the “Report from Iron Mountain”, there can be NO substitute for war unless is meets the following three criteria: It must be economically wasteful, it must represent a credible threat of great magnitude, and it must provide a logical excuse for compulsory service to the government.

242

This is the origination of the “green movement” that is slowly but surely being indoctrinated into the world societies, with the threat of “manmade global warming” being the chief threat. Manmade global warming is a complete fraud, concocted by the New World Order crowd, and we will go over this later.

The report also considers ways in which the public could be preoccupied with trivial activities such that they would not have the time to participate in politics or resistance to their plans. Recreational drugs, rebellious music, trivial television shows such as sitcoms, and pornography were all lined up to be launched against humanity---and they were---but the best way to preoccupy humans and especially the men who might want to resist the march towards one world government, was to revisit the blood games of the ancient Roman Empire. Blood games are competitive events between individuals or teams that are sufficiently violent in nature to enable the spectators to satisfy their frustrations with how society was going down the tubes.

Enter professional sports in the United States……… This is when pro basketball, football, baseball, and hockey were all turned into mainstays of the Mainstream Media---shortly after this report was issued in 1967---along with rampant drug use, “hippie” music and the hippie movement, television game shows, sitcoms, pornographic magazines and movies, and the like. All of these new and exciting activities hypnotized the public into a coma, for lack of a better word. Instead of coming home and reading a book or doing some wholesome family activities---or questioning what was going on with their country and government---families would plop down in front of the idiot box for some wholesale Tavistock-inspired brainwashing.

The result of this program implemented in the mid to late 60’s resulted in the societal excesses displayed in the 70’s and beyond. These activities set in motion the downfall of the New Babylon, all by design.

These new and exciting activities were enough to pacify, sedate and distract a large part of the population, but wars were still needed in their opinion---albeit smaller wars thanks to the newfound brain-busying activities---at least until such time that a more credible threat could be foisted upon humanity to take us to the next level of the Great Plan.

Per the report:

“Allegiance requires a cause; a cause requires an enemy. This much is obvious; the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must seem genuinely formidable. Roughly speaking, the presumed power of the “enemy” sufficient to warrant an individual sense of allegiance to a society must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the society. Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness.”

Enter the environmental movement…now called the Green Movement…hatched at the inaugural Earth Day in 1970---4 years after the report was issued. The first Earth Day paved the way for the UN’s Earth Summit in Stockholm in 1972, chaired by New World Order proponent to the extreme

243

This is all you need to know for now about this. Again, just trying to tell you as briefly as possible the general topics you need to be concerned about and look into for yourself while you can. However, I will explain soon how they are going to use the environmental movement via the Global Warming hoax to crush the United States economy and help bring the entire world under their Global Government. That is, of course, if the coming dollar collapse fails to accomplish this.

"Although war is "used" as an instrument of national and social policy, the fact that a society is organized for any degree of readiness for war supersedes its political and economic structure. War itself is the basic social system, within which other secondary modes of social organization conflict or conspire. It is the system which has governed most human societies of record, as it is today. The precedence of a society's war-making potential over its other characteristics is not the result of the "threat" presumed to exist at any one time from other societies. This is the reverse of the basic situation; "threats" against the "national interest" are usually created or accelerated to meet the changing needs of the war system. Wars are not "caused" by international conflicts of interest... war-making societies require - and thus bring about - such conflicts. The capacity of a nation to make war expresses the greatest social power it can exercise; war-making, active or contemplated, is a matter of life and death on the greatest scale subject to social control. It should therefore hardly be surprising that the military institutions in each society claim its highest priorities."

-Report from Iron Mountain, 1967

244