Image:
VOL.
DESIGN STUDIO ERIK G L'HEUREUX (PHD) FAIA DEAN’S CHAIR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AR5802, AY 2022/2023 M.ARCH 1, SEMESTER 2 CHELSEA HO JIA XUAN CHEN JIAXIN CHNG YOKE MINN, ASHLEY HOU XINYAO HUGO ONG LEE YONG SOON LI PEISHAN LIU HENG MUHAMMAD ASHRAFF BIN ABDUL ALEEM SHAWN PECK WEE ANN SITI HAZIRAH BINTE HASSAN SUN JIANXIN DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE
Ba Cheiu Market, Sun Jianxin HOT AIR III: DENSITY, CARBON & LABOUR
1
AR5802HOTAIRIII: DENSITY,CARBON&LABOUR
Introduction TravelItinerary ContemporaryTools WK04 Trip to HCMC AnalysingSouthernVietnameseModern Architecture Location plan The Carbon Metric Overall Comparison through a Carbon Lens 2023 1 D3 Victory Hotel 2 D1 Saigon V.A.R Building 3 D3 Saigon University 4 D1 Hoa Lu Hotel 5 BT Ba Chieu Market 6 D5 132 Tran Tuan Khai Street Researchonalternativelow/zerocarbon materials StudioDocumentation References 7 8 9 10 14 16 18 19 20 40 52 60 70 8 90 108 131
INTRODUCTION
“Therapidincreaseinpopulationovertheareaof thetropicspresentsitselftotheworldasaproblem oftheutmostgravity....”
MaxwellFryandJaneDrew
6
As the equatorial city’s relationship to climate, density, and carbon becomes a critical concern to the health of our planet, the studio will research the mediums ofHotAir,Density,CarbonForm,andLaboursituatedinHoChiMinhCity,adense and growing city on the equator. Students working in small groups will propose planet-positive additions to the city. As the equatorial city evolves from the granular, porous, and informal to a more formal, conditioned, and carbondependentmetropolis,theideaofthecarbon-neutralorplanet-positivecityseems increasingly challenging in the face of large-scale capital, global aspirations, and importedtechnologicalsystemsthatshapethecityinitscurrenttrajectory.Adding new buildings by demolishing old areas erases the historical legacies and active informal networks of neighborhoods. It also throws tremendous carbon into the atmosphere that was invested by earlier generations. How architects imagine a future of planet-positive action, decarbonization AND increased rural-urban migration, increased densities, and aspirations to have similar conveniences at the Global North will be questions that guide the design studio research.
Rapid population growth and increased urbanization about the equator have led to tighter building aggregations, closer building proximities, and enlarged plot coverages,eachofwhichprofoundlychangesthespatialqualityoftheequatorial city. This urbanization process also requires tremendous embodied carbon as cities go higher and increased operational carbon to ventilate and manage the interiorairenvironments.Withrespondingincreasesinbuildingheight,theclimatic primacy of a broad tropical landscape to shield the building from intense sun and heat has shifted from the necessity of the manicured jungle imagined in George Orwell’s “Burmese Days” to that of the elevation and sealed enclosure in mid and large-scaled urban densities. This process is visibly and dramatically evidenced in the case study of Ho Chi Minh City. Moreover, the externalities of carbon – the extractive processes (mining, melting, polluting) that produce this developmentalandverticallandscapehavebeenrenderedoutsideofarchitectural discourse.Andatthesametime,thelaborthatisembeddedintheurbanlandscape from the architect to the craftsperson is increasingly discounted as a valuable investment. It is within this dramatic context that the studio will be situated.
In Ho Chi Minh City, the collision of mounting densities, architecture, air, and carbon not only impact quantitative changes of increased solar insolation, urban wideheatgain,rainwaterrun-off,extremesofhumidity,anddecreasedventilation but implicate degraded material streams, excessive carbon consumptions and territorial scale effects that degrade the larger ecosystem in which the city is situated.
The design research will propose adaptive reuse of examples of robust and compelling mid-twentieth-century tropical buildings (from 1930-1980) selected by the student teams. The students will study the precedents through carbon, atmospheric, and material ecosystems and understand how these buildings are situated in the context of HCMC and the more prominent ecologies from which they are formed. Students will then propose adaptively reuse of the buildings, expanding their area and volume while making informed material choices consideringLifeCycleAnalysis,operationalandembodiedcarbonwithaminimum demandthattheproposalsarecarbonneutral.Theresearchoutcomeswillexpand students’ capability beyond the optic and iconic to the climatic and atmospheric in consideration of carbon and lifecycle concerns to make planet positive action on our planet.
7
Dean’sChairAssociateProfessorErikL’HeureuxFAIA
Ho
Leave Carbon Symposium to Changi
Arrival at Tan Son Nhat International Airport + SIM card purchase
Dinner at 4Ps Pizza
Breakfast at Little Hanoi
Visit Saigon Central Post Office
Lunch at Pho 2000
Visit Case Study Buildings
Collection of Visa from Vietnam Embassy
Arrival at Tan Son Nhat International Airport
Architectural firm visit at Kientruc O w Dam Vu+Mel Shneck Dinner and sharing with Mel Shneck
Visit Case Study Buildings
Architectural firm visit at Aaaaaa w Triet Le
Lunch and Sharing w Triet Le Sharing with Archie at Red Door Cafe
Visit Case Study Buildings Free and Easy
Dinner w Erik at 4Ps Pizza (Restaurant of Shade, Nishizawa)
Fly back to Singapore
Visit Case Study Buidlings Free and Easy
TravelItinerary 02/02/23-07/02/23
ChiMinhCity,Vietnam Day00(02/02) Group A Group B Day01(03/02) Day02(04/02) Day03(05/02) Day04(06/02) Day05(07/02) 0650 1330 0800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1900 1400 1355 1000 1805 2100 0900 1800 0900 1100 1300 1630 1030 Fly back to Singapore
Airport
8
9
10
11
12
13
ANALYZINGSOUTHERNVIETNAMESE MODERNISTARCHITECTURE
14
HoChiMinhCity 2023 1 D3 Victory Hotel 2 D1 Saigon V.A.R Building 3 D3 Saigon University 4 D1 Hoa Lu Hotel 5 BT Ba Chieu Market 6 D5 132 Tran Tuan Khai Street Total Embodied Carbon (kgCO2e) 29,398,410 7,341,195 7,263,969 5,458,769 4,087,329 3,862,797 Embodied Carbon/sqm (kgCO2e/m2) 3,546 1,470 3,195 2,257 2,680 1,935 15
3 S2 S1 16
5 6 4 Location Plan S1. BT Ba Chieu Market Ph ườ ng 1, Bình Th ạ nh, Thành ph ố H ồ Chí Minh S2. D3 Victory Hotel 14 Võ V ă n T ầ n, Ph ườ ng 6, Qu ậ n 3, Thành ph ố H ồ CThí Minh 3. D3 Saigon University 105 Bà Huy ệ n Thanh Quan Street,District 3 4. D1 Hoa Lu Hotel 59 Nguyen Träi, Phung Pham Ngü Läo, Quàn 1 5. D1 Saigon V.A.R Building 9 Ho Tung Mau Street, Nguyen Thai Binh Ward, District 1 6. D5 132 Tr ầ n Tu ấ n Kh ả Street 105 Bà Huy ệ n Thanh Quan Street,District 3 Source: ELH Studio 2022 0m 250m 500m 17
THE CARBON METRIC
EMBODIED CARBON OF BUILDING MATERIALS GEO SPECIFIC TO VIETNAM (KgCO2eq/Kg)
DISTRIBUTION OF EMBODIED CARBON WITHIN STRUCTURE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION COMMERCIAL EDUCATION RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL EDUCATION RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL EDUCATION 128. 6(kWh/m2/year) MARKET 123.1 (kWh/m2/year) OFFICE 44.6 (kWh/m2/year) EDUCATION 60.0 (kWh/m2/year) RESIDENTIAL 220 (kWh/m2/year) HOTEL 25% 23% 16% WALLS 23% 19% 17% FOUNDATIONS 13% 11% 6% BEAMS 8% 7% 3% COLUMNS 47% 42% 40% FLOORS ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) OF BUILDING CLASSIFICATIONS OPERATIONAL CARBON DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 2700 44,631.00 16.53 ALUMINIUM PROFILE DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 2500 3,061.95 1.22 FLOAT GLASS DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 7850 30,680.41 3.91 STEEL SHEET DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 7850 22,724.24 2.89 REBAR DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 2400 336.35 0.14 PRECAST CONCRETE DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 2400 309.00 0.13 CONCRETE DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 620 329.40 0.53 WOOD (PLYWOOD) DENSITY (Kg/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/m3) CARBON FACTOR (/Kg) 1650 396.00 0.24 CLAY BRICK 18
THE CARBON LENS: SOUTHERN VIETNAMESE MODERNIST ARCHITECTURE 3,195 1,935 1,470 2,680 VICTORY HOTEL V.A.R BUILDLING 3,546 SAIGON UNIVERSITY 2,257 HOA LU HOTEL BA CHIEU MARKET 132 TRAN TRAI STREET VICTORY HOTEL 8,289.3 4,994 1,525 V.A.R BUILDLING 2,273 SAIGON UNIVERSITY BA CHIEU MARKET 2,418 HOA LU HOTEL 1,997 132 TRAN TRAI STREET 6,353 2,205 704 1,121 1,239 1,608 VICTORY HOTEL V.A.R BUILDLING SAIGON UNIVERSITY BA CHIEU MARKET HOA LU HOTEL 132 TRAN TRAI STREET 5,799 4,653 2,618 3,118 3,328 4,627 BA CHIEU MARKET SAIGON UNIVERSITY VICTORY HOTEL HOA LU HOTEL 132 TRAN TRAI STREET V.A.R BUILDLING 220 128.4 44.6 60 60 123.1 VICTORY HOTEL BA CHIEU MARKET V.A.R BUILDING SAIGON UNIVERSITY HOA LU HOTEL 132 TRAN TRAI STREET GROSS FLOOR AREA (m2) EMBODIED CARBON EMISSIONS PER SQUARE METER (KgCO2e/m2) TOTAL MATERIAL VOLUME (m3) EMBODIED CARBON EMISSIONS PER CUBIC METER (KgCO2e/m3) ENERGY USE INTENSITY (kWh/m2/year) 19
VICTORYHOTEL
14 Võ Văn Tần, Phường 6, Quận 3 Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Vietnam Architect:Unknown Year:1960
Ashraff,LiuHeng
Rebar Concrete Clay Masonry Aluminium Glass Steel Timber Gross
(m2) 8,289.3
(kWh/m2/yr) 220
Vietnam
(kgCO2/kWh) 0.85 Mass (kg) 9,575,826 11,710,565 379,537 3,301 42,074 708 4,011 CarbonFactor (kgCO2e/kg) 2.89 0.13 0.24 16.53 1.22 3.91 0.53 EmbodiedCarbon (kgCO2e) 27,674,139 1,522,373 91,089 54,581 51,331 2,769 2,126
Materials
FloorArea
AverageEUIfor hotelsincities
Average
Energy gridemissionfactor
EmbodiedCarbon(kgCO2e): AnnualOperationalCarbon(kgCO2e/yr): 3,546.5 29,398,410 1,958,940 20
EmbodiedCarbonEmissions/sqm(kgCO2e/m2): Total
21
05 25 1015 Exploded Axonometric 1:200 Concrete 7720 m Masonry 5153 m 3 3 3 3 Metals 2500 m Glass 17 m ROTATE 90° ROTATE 90° WEEK 02 23
0m5m 1:150 Embodied Carbon /kgCO Model /hr Travel /hr Work /hr 01 13 2 28.92kgCO 32.02 30 01 14 01 15 01 16 01 17 01 18 01 19 01 20 01 21 01 22 01 23 01 24 01 25 01 26 01 27 01 28 01 29 01 30 01 31 02 02 02 03 02 04 02 05 02 06 02 07 02 01 03 01 02 09 02 10 02 11 02 12 02 13 02 14 02 08 02 16 02 17 02 18 02 19 02 20 02 21 02 15 02 23 02 24 02 25 02 26 02 02 02 22 25 24
Reinforced Concrete 5,723.10 3,634,168.50 KgCO Clay Masonry 6,215.20 Steel 42,315.00 Aluminium 2.70 48,624.30 KgCO 16.90 60,840.00 KgCO Timber 2,574.00 20m 10m 20m 0m5m10m 1:150 1:1500 03 02 03 03 03 04 03 05 03 06 03 07 03 09 03 10 03 11 03 12 03 13 03 14 03 08 03 23 03 24 03 25 03 26 03 27 03 28 03 22 03 30 03 31 04 01 04 02 04 03 04 04 03 29 04 06 04 07 04 08 04 09 04 10 04 05 04 11 04 13 04 14 04 15 04 16 04 12 04 19 04 17 04 18 03 16 03 17 03 18 03 19 03 20 03 21 03 15 WEEK 03 25
/kgCO /hr 01 13 10 20 30 01 14 01 15 01 16 01 17 01 18 01 19 01 20 01 21 01 22 01 23 01 24 01 25 01 26 01 27 01 28 01 29 01 30 01 31 02 02 02 03 02 04 02 05 02 06 02 07 02 01 02 09 02 10 02 11 02 12 02 13 02 14 02 08 02 16 02 17 02 18 02 19 02 20 02 21 02 15 02 23 02 24 02 25 02 26 02 02 02 22 26
0m5m10m20m 1:150 3-11km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h Average speed: 11.2km/h 03 01 03 02 03 03 03 04 03 05 03 06 03 07 03 09 03 10 03 11 03 12 03 13 03 14 03 08 03 23 03 24 03 25 03 26 03 27 03 28 03 22 03 30 03 31 04 01 04 02 04 03 04 04 03 29 04 06 04 07 04 08 04 09 04 10 04 05 04 11 04 13 04 14 04 15 04 16 04 12 04 19 04 17 04 18 03 16 03 17 03 18 03 19 03 20 03 21 03 15 35°C 55°C 22°C 28°C Surface TemperatureAmbient Temperature WEEK 04 27
Victory Hotel 04 19 28
Reinforced Concrete WEEK 04 29
Brick Masonry 30
Aluminum Steel Glass Timber Pre-cast Concrete Reinforced Concrete 14,307,750 kg 2,657,807 KgCO2e Brick Masonry 10,255,080 kg 2,144,244 KgCO2e Steel 27,475 kg 42,315 KgCO2e Aluminum 7,395 kg 48,624 KgCO e Glass 43,602 kg 60,840 KgCO2e Timber 14,040 kg 2,574 KgCO2e WEEK 04 31
Sun Path Group: Liu Heng Muhammad Ashraff Bin Abdul Aleem T 01|12 F 01|13 S 01|14 S 01|15 M 01|16 T 01|17 W 01|18 T 01|19 F 01|20 S 01|21 S 01|22 M 01|23 T 01|24 W 01|25 T 01|26 F 01|27 S 01|28 S 01|29 M 01|30 T 01|31 W 02|01 T 02|02 F 02|03 S 02|04 S 02|05 M 02|06 T 02|07 W 02|08 T 02|09 F 02|10 S 02|11 S 02|12 M 02|13 T 02|14 W 02|15 T 02|16 F 02|17 S 02|18 S 02|19 M 02|20 T 02|21 W 02|22 T 02|23 F 02|24 S 02|25 S 02|26 M 02|27 T 02|28 W 03|01 C: C: C:200KgCO C:200KgCO C:200KgCO C:200KgCO C:200KgCO 24 16 32
05m10m 1:150 3-11km/h Average speed: 11.2km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h 55°C30°C Surface Temperature Ambient Temperature 30°C24°C WEEK 06 INTERIM WEEK 06 INTERIM 33
Victory Hotel 34
Concrete Clay Masonry 379 537 Kg 91 089 KgCO2e Glass 42 074 Kg 51 331 KgCO2e Steel 708 Kg 2 769 KgCO2e Aluminium 3 301 Kg 54 581 KgCO2e Timber 4 011 Kg 2 126 KgCO2e Total Embodied Carbon 29 398 410 KgCO2e Operational Carbon / year 1 958 940 KgCO2e WEEK 06 INTERIM 35
Timber 36
WEEK 06 INTERIM Steel Rebar 9 575 826 Kg 27 674 139 KgCO2e Concrete 11 710 565 Kg 1 522 373 KgCO2e 05m10m 1:150 WEEK 06 INTERIM 37
Brick Masonry 38
WEEK 06 INTERIM Glass Aluminum WEEK 06 INTERIM 39
V.A.RBUILDING
9 Ho Tung Mau Street in Nguyen Thai Binh Ward, Disrtict 1, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Le Van Lam
Materials Rebar Concrete Clay Masonry Aluminium Steel Glass Precast Concrete Timber GrossFloorArea (m2) 4,994 AverageEUIfor commercialincities (kWh/m2/yr) 123.1 AverageVietnamEnergy gridemissionfactor (kgCO2/kWh) 0.85
JiaXin,JianXin
Architect:
Year:
Mass (kg) 2,234,352 2,732,456 1,239,691 9,384 13,862 7,949 33,321 5,602 CarbonFactor (kgCO2e/kg) 2.89 0.13 0.24 16.53 3.91 1.22 0.14 0.53 EmbodiedCarbon (kgCO2e) 6,457,279 355,219 297,283 155,130 54,201 9,698 4,665 2,969 EmbodiedCarbonEmissions/sqm(kgCO2e/m2): TotalEmbodiedCarbon(kgCO2e): AnnualOperationalCarbon(kgCO2e/yr): 1,470 7,341,195.95 631,681.50 40
1973
41
WEEK 02 43
01 13 0.3h 0.5h 01 14 01 15 01 16 01 17 01 18 01 19 01 20 01 21 01 22 01 23 01 24 01 25 01 26 01 27 01 28 01 29 01 30 01 31 02 02 02 03 02 04 02 05 02 06 02 07 02 01 02 09 02 10 02 11 02 12 02 13 02 14 02 08 02 16 02 17 02 18 02 19 02 20 02 21 02 15 02 23 02 24 02 25 02 26 02 02 02 22 44
20m 0 5m10m 1:150 S S S S S S S Reinforced Concrete Volume 2914 KgCO Masonry Volume 354 Volume 4 KgCO Volume 15 KgCO GLass Volume 4 Operational Carbon /year 631681KgCO year WEEK 03 45
Embodied Work F 1.5h 27.04 0.84 0.320.52 6.0h 10.8h 12.0h S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M 27 T 28 W 6.0h 10.0h 38°C 60°C 25°C 38°C Surface TemperatureAmbient Temperature 20m 0m5m10m 1:150 3-11km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h Average speed: 11.2km/h 46
20m 0 5m10m 1:150 Reinforced Concrete Mass 5733000Kg Embodied Carbon 1456182KgCO2 Aluminum Steel Glass Reinforced Concrete Precast Reinforced Concrete Masonry Precast Reinforced Concrete Mass 40100Kg Embodied Carbon 7749KgCO2 Masonry Mass 1271672Kg Embodied Carbon 265895KgCOe Steel Mass 24963Kg Embodied Carbon 38446KgCO2e Aluminum Mass 4163Kg Embodied Carbon 27374KgCO2 GLass Mass 6192Kg Embodied Carbon 8640KgCO2e Total Embodied Carbon 1803986KgCO2 Operational Carbon /year 631681KgCO2 EUI 123.1kWh/m2 . year WEEK 04 47
SunPath 05m10m 1:150 3-11km/h Average speed: 11.2km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h 38°C 60°C 25°C 38°C SurfaceTemperatureAmbientTemperature Group Chen Jiaxin Sun Jianxin WEEK 06 INTERIM WEEK 06 INTERIM 49
Steel Glass Aluminium Wood Clay Masonry T 01|12 work model F 01|13 S 01|14 S 01|15 M 01|16 T 01|17 W 01|18 T 01|19 F 01|20 S 01|21 S 01|22 M 01|23 T 01|24 W 01|25 01|26 F 01|27 S 01|28 S 01|29 M 01|30 01|31 W 02|01 T 02|02 F 02|03 S 02|04 S 02|05 M 02|06 T 02|07 W 02|08 T 02|09 F 02|10 S 02|11 S 02|12 M 02|13 T 02|14 W 02|15 T 02|16 F 02|17 S 02|18 S 02|19 M 02|20 T 02|21 W 02|22 T 02|23 F 02|24 S 02|25 S 02|26 M 02|27 T 02|28 W 03|01 W6 W4 W3 W2 24 0 2 4 22 0.75 2.44 1.05 0.42 0.86 0.35 343.82 339.84 0.08 0.32 1.18 Group ChenJiaxin SunJianxin 50
Reinforced Concrete Precast Reinforced Concrete Rebar 284.63 m3 2234352.60 Kg 6457279.00 KgCO2e Operational Carbon /year 631681.50 KgCO2e EUI 123.1kWh/m2*year Concrete 1138.52 m3 2732456.68 Kg 355219.37 KgCO2e Precast Concrete 13.88 m3 33321.98 Kg 4665.08 KgCO2e Clay Masonry 750.72 m3 1238681.60 Kg 297283.58 KgCO2e Steel 1.77 m3 13862.17 Kg 54201.09 KgCO2e Aluminium 3.48 m3 9384.80 Kg 155130.69 KgCO2e Glass 3.18 m3 7949.46 Kg 9698.34 KgCO2e Wood 9.04 m3 5602.63 Kg 2969.39 KgCO2e Total Embodied Carbon 7340111.95 KgCO2e W 03|01 05m10m V.A.RBuidling1:150 050m100m 200m Cubes1:2000 WEEK 06 INTERIM WEEK 06 INTERIM 51
SAIGONUNIVERSITY
105 Ba Huyen Thanh Quan Street
District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Architect:Unknown Year:1970s
PeiShan,XinYao
GrossFloorArea (m2) 2,273 CalculatedEUIof Saigon
(kWh/m2/yr) 44.6
Vietnam
gridemissionfactor (kgCO2/kWh) 0.85 EmbodiedCarbonEmissions/sqm(kgCO2e/m2): TotalEmbodiedCarbon(kgCO2e): AnnualOperationalCarbon(kgCO2e/yr): 3,195 7,263,969 86,169 Materials Rebar Steel Aluminium Clay Masonry Concrete Glass Mass (kg) 1,543,310 188,736 891,000 588,750 15,039 12,150 CarbonFactor (kgCO2e/kg) 2.89 3.91 16.53 0.24 0.13 1.22 EmbodiedCarbon (kgCO2e) 4,460,165 2,302,012 248,594 213,840 24,535 14,823 52
University
Average
Energy
53
WEEK 02 55
Volume Embodied Carbon Brick Embodied Carbon Steel Volume Volume GLass Masonry Embodied Carbon 05m10m 1:150 Embodied Model Travel Work Aluminum 2.13 13.1 29.4 25 C WEEK 03 57
38°C 25°C 30°C 35°C Ambient Temperature Surface Temperature 05m10m 1:150 3-11km/hAveragespeed:11.2km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h 58
WEEK 06 INTERIM 05m10m 1:150 050m100m 200m 1:2000 Rebar 1,543,310 kg 4,460,165.90 KgCO2e Group Hou Xinyao Li Peishan Concrete 188,736,0 kg 245,356.80 KgCO2e Clay Masonry 891,000 kg 213,840.00 KgCO2e Steel 588,750 kg 2,302,012.50 KgCO2e Aluminium 15,039 kg 248,594.67 KgCO2e Glass 12,150 kg 14,823.00 KgCO2e Operational Carbon 649,194.00 KgCO2e T 01|12 F 01|13 S 01|14 S 01|15 M 01|16 T 01|17 W 01|18 T 01|19 F 01|20 S 01|21 S 01|22 M 01|23 T 01|24 W 01|25 01|26 F 01|27 S 01|28 S 01|29 M 01|30 T 01|31 W 02|01 T 02|02 F 02|03 S 02|04 S 02|05 M 02|06 T 02|07 W 02|08 T 02|09 F 02|10 S 02|11 S 02|12 M 02|13 T 02|14 W 02|15 02|16 F 02|17 S 02|18 S 02|19 M 02|20 T 02|21 W 02|22 T 02|23 F 02|24 S 02|25 S 02|26 M 02|27 T 02|28 W 03|01 4 6 8 22 WEEK 06 INTERIM 59
HOALUHOTEL
59 Nguyen Trai, Phung Pham Ngu Lao, Quan 1, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
1960
Chelsea,YongSoon
Year:
Materials Rebar Clay Masonry Concrete Steel Glass Timber GrossFloorArea (m2) 2,418 AverageEUIfor residentialsincities (kWh/m2/yr) 60 AverageVietnamEnergy gridemissionfactor (kgCO2/kWh) 0.85 Mass (kg) 1,770,363 890,967 1,082,515 3,108 7,289 6,789 CarbonFactor (kgCO2e/kg) 2.89 0.24 0.13 3.91 1.22 0.53 EmbodiedCarbon (kgCO2e) 5,116,350 213,832 105,545 12,154 7,289 3,598 EmbodiedCarbonEmissions/sqm(kgCO2e/m2): TotalEmbodiedCarbon(kgCO2e): AnnualOperationalCarbon(kgCO2e/yr): 2,257 5,458,769 123,333 60
Architect:Unknown
61
69 dB Exploded Axonometric 1:150 0525 1015 Concrete 242,990 KgCO2 Masonary 81,430 KgCO2 Metals 62,000 KgCO2 Glass 15,000 KgCO2 Timber 1,800 KgCO2 25°C 38°C Sun Radiation WEEK 02 63
74 dB 74 dB 81 dB 72 dB 72 dB 73 dB 69 dB 75 dB 20m 05m10m 1:150 Reinforced Concrete 563.81 358,019.35 KgCO Masonry 3.96 47,876.40 KgCO 10.95 1,204.50 KgCO Operational Carbon /year Glass Embodied (kgCO2e) 01 13 14 15.39 0.24 10.35 14 01 14 01 15 01 16 01 17 01 18 01 19 01 20 01 21 01 22 01 23 01 24 01 25 01 26 01 27 01 28 01 29 01 30 01 31 02 02 02 03 02 04 02 05 02 06 02 07 02 01 02 09 02 10 02 11 02 12 02 13 02 14 02 08 02 16 02 17 02 18 02 19 02 20 02 21 02 15 02 23 02 24 02 25 02 26 02 02 02 22 25°C 38°C Sun Radiation WEEK 03 65
74 dB 73 dB 79 dB 72 dB 73 dB 72 dB 77 dB 25°C 25°C 38°C30°C Surface TemperatureAmbient Temperature 20m 05m10m 1:150 Carbon (kgCO2e) Model Work 01 13 8.09 7.35 01 14 01 15 01 16 01 17 01 18 01 19 01 20 01 21 01 22 01 23 01 24 01 25 01 26 01 27 01 28 01 29 01 30 01 31 02 02 02 03 02 04 02 05 02 06 02 07 02 01 02 09 02 10 02 11 02 12 02 13 02 14 02 08 02 16 02 17 02 18 02 19 02 20 02 21 02 15 02 23 02 24 02 25 02 26 02 02 02 22 20 24 3-11km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h Average speed: 11.2km/h 66
T T T F S S M W S S M T W T S M T W T W T T F S S W W M T F S S M T W Reinforced Concrete 563.81 358,019.35 KgCO e Masonry 539.98 m 186,293.10 KgCO2 Steel 3.96 m3 47,876.40 KgCO e Timber 10.95 1,204.50 KgCO e Total Embodied Carbon 601,996.81 KgCO e Glass 2.39 8,604 KgCO e Operational Carbon /year 123,333.81 KgCO e WEEK 04 67
05m10m 1:150 3-11km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h Averagespeed:11.2km/h 74 dB 73 dB 79 dB 72 dB 73 dB 72 dB 77 dB 25°C 25°C 38°C30°C Surface TemperatureAmbient Temperature W E 68
05m10m 1:150 Rebar 1,770,363.70 kg 5,116,350 KgCO2e Concrete 1,082,515.20kg 213,832 KgCO 2e Clay Masonry 890,967.00kg 213,832.08 KgCO2e Steel 3,108.60kg 12,154.63 KgCO2e Wood (Plywood) 6,789.00kg 3,598.17 KgCO2e Total Embodied Carbon 3,598.17 KgCO2e Glass 5,975.00kg 7,289.50 KgCO2e Operational Carbon /year 123,333.81 KgCO2e 050m100m 200m 1:2000 T 01|12 F 01|13 S 01|14 S 01|15 M 01|16 T 01|17 W 01|18 T 01|19 F 01|20 S 01|21 S 01|22 M 01|23 T 01|24 W 01|25 T 01|26 F 01|27 S 01|28 S 01|29 M 01|30 01|31 W 02|01 T 02|02 F 02|03 S 02|04 S 02|05 M 02|06 T 02|07 W 02|08 T 02|09 F 02|10 S 02|11 S 02|12 M 02|13 02|14 W 02|15 T 02|16 F 02|17 S 02|18 S 02|19 M 02|20 T 02|21 W 02|22 T 02|23 F 02|24 S 02|25 S 02|26 M 02|27 T 02|28 W 03|01 T:4h C:7.78KgCO T:19h C:70.63KgCO T:42h C:282.81KgCO T:12h C:39.6KgCO T:4h C:20.67KgCO T:9h C:33.03KgCO 8.09 0.24 2.43 7.23 7.23 5.45 19.50 22.75 19.50 109.35 10 12 Group: Chelsea Ho Jia Xuan Lee Yong Soon Reinforced Concrete Masonry Glass Aluminium Mild Steel WEEK 06 INTERIM 69
BACHIEUMARKET
Phường 1, Bình Thạnh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh Hö Chi Minh, Vietnam
Architect:Unknown Year:1942
Hazirah,Shawn
Materials Steel Rebar Concrete Clay Masonry Glass GrossFloorArea (m2) 1,525 CalculatedEUIof BachieuMarket (kWh/m2/yr) 128.4 AverageVietnamEnergy gridemissionfactor (kgCO2/kWh) 0.85 Mass (kg) 554,500 590,713 722,400 416,295 14,000 CarbonFactor (kgCO2e/kg) 3.91 2.89 0.13 0.24 1.22 EmbodiedCarbon (kgCO2e) 2,167,172 1,709,999 93,009 87,043 17,146 EmbodiedCarbonEmissions/sqm(kgCO2e/m2): TotalEmbodiedCarbon(kgCO2e): AnnualOperationalCarbon(kgCO2e/yr): 2,680 4,087,329 166,438 70
71
72
WEEK 02 73
05m10m 1:150 T S M T F M T W W F S M T W S S M W T S M T W W Carbon Model Work F M T W F S S M 25 Aluminium Steel Glass Concrete Brick Timber 74
Volume 783.45 Embodied Carbon 497,490 Masonry Embodied Carbon 87,043 Steel Embodied Carbon 245,430 Aluminium Embodied Carbon 73,837 Glass 20m 05m 1:150 10m 20m T F M T F S M T W T S M T W T F S M T W S S M W T S W W M S S M W Sun Path WEEK 03 75
76
WEEK 04 77
38°C 60°C 25°C 38°C Surface Temperature Ambient Temperature Sun Path Averagespeed:11.2km/h 05m10m 1:150 3-11km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h 78
ALU STEEL GLASS CONCRETE BRICK TIMBER Group: ShawnPeckWeeAnn SitiHazirahBinteHassan T 01|12 F 01|13 S 01|14 S 01|15 M 01|16 01|17 W 01|18 T 01|19 F 01|20 S 01|21 S 01|22 M 01|23 T 01|24 W 01|25 T 01|26 F 01|27 S 01|28 S 01|29 M 01|30 T 01|31 W 02|01 T 02|02 F 02|03 S 02|04 S 02|05 M 02|06 T 02|07 W 02|08 T 02|09 F 02|10 S 02|11 S 02|12 M 02|13 T 02|14 W 02|15 T 02|16 F 02|17 S 02|18 S 02|19 M 02|20 02|21 W 02|22 T 02|23 F 02|24 S 02|25 S 02|26 M 02|27 T 02|28 W 03|01 7.25 7.15 18.45 7.35 22.75 10 Rebar 1,360,484 kg 3,938,338.03 KgCO Concrete 1,663,800.00kg 214,214.25 KgCO2e Clay Masonry 416,295.00kg 87,043.00 KgCO2e Steel 554,500.00kg 2,167,172.12 KgCO2 Total Embodied Carbon 6,423,914.17 KgCO2e Glass 14,000.00kg 17,146.92 KgCO2e Operational Carbon /year 123,333.81 KgCO2e 050m100m 200m 1:2000 WEEK
INTERIM WEEK 06 INTERIM 79
06
132TRANTUANKHAISTREET
Ashley,Hugo
Architect:Unknown Year:Unknown Materials Rebar Clay Masonry Concrete Aluminium Steel Glass Timber GrossFloorArea (m2) 1,997 AverageEUIfor residentialsincities (kWh/m2/yr) 60 AverageVietnamEnergy gridemissionfactor (kgCO2/kWh) 0.85 Mass (kg) 1,185,428 787,710 1,449,696 1,863 3,689 11,425 440 CarbonFactor (kgCO2e/kg) 2.89 0.24 0.13 16.53 3.91 1.22 0.53 EmbodiedCarbon (kgCO2e) 3,435,888 189,050 188,460 30,795 14,425 13,938 238 EmbodiedCarbonEmissions/sqm(kgCO2e/m2): TotalEmbodiedCarbon(kgCO2e): AnnualOperationalCarbon(kgCO2e/yr): 1,935 3,862,797 101,847 80
132 Tran Tuan Khai, Quan 5, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
81
WEEK 02 83
24.75 7.53 6.12 10.11 39.22 0.1 0.14 0.39 05m10m20m 1:150 0.33 C 84
20m 05m10m 1:150 Concrete 754.5 492,688.5 KgCO Masonry Steel Aluminum 14,040 KgCO 79.86 WEEK 03 85
0m5m10m20m 1:150 3-11km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h Average speed: 11.2km/h Carbon Travel 16.76 7.53 6.12 35°C 70°C 23°C 35°C Surface TemperatureAmbient Temperature 29.75 27.4 86
Concrete 1,887,625 KG 493,047 KgCO2e 0m50m100m200m 1:1500 0m5m10m20m 1:150 Masonry 787,710 KG 164,703 KgCO2e Aluminium 1,889 KG 12,426 KgCO2e Glass 754.5m3 492,688.5 KgCO2e Steel 3,689 KG 5,682 KgCO2e Timber 490 KG 79 KgCO2e Total Embodied Carbon 692,391 KgCO2e Operational Carbon 20,364 KgCO2e / year Concrete Masonry Timber Aluminium Steel Glass WEEK 04 87
35°C 70°C 23°C 35°C Surface TemperatureAmbient Temperature 05m10m 1:150 3-11km/hAveragespeed:11.2km/h 11-24km/h 24-35km/h 88
Concrete Masonry Timber Aluminium Steel Glass 24.75 7.53 10.11 39.22 0.1 0.32 29.75 3.11 30.49 29.91 38.19 T 01|12 F 01|13 S 01|14 S 01|15 M 01|16 T 01|17 W 01|18 T 01|19 F 01|20 S 01|21 S 01|22 M 01|23 T 01|24 W 01|25 T 01|26 F 01|27 S 01|28 S 01|29 M 01|30 T 01|31 W 02|01 T 02|02 F 02|03 S 02|04 S 02|05 M 02|06 T 02|07 W 02|08 T 02|09 F 02|10 S 02|11 S 02|12 M 02|13 T 02|14 W 02|15 T 02|16 F 02|17 S 02|18 S 02|19 M 02|20 T 02|21 W 02|22 T 02|23 F 02|24 S 02|25 S 02|26 M 02|27 T 02|28 W 03|01 C:0KgCO W6 C:0KgCO C:100.88KgCO W4 C:855.04KgCO W3 C:93.45KgCO W2 C:40.53KgCO C:65.59KgCO 2 8 14 20 05m10m 1:150 050m100m 200m 1:2000 Clay Masonry 787,710.00 kg 189,050.40 KgCO2e Rebar 1,185,428.50 kg 3,425,888.37 KgCO2e Concrete 1,449,696.00 kg 188,460.48 KgCO2e Aluminium 1,863.00 kg 30,795.39 KgCO2e Steel 3,689.50 kg 14,425.95 KgCO2e Glass 11,425.00 kg 13,938.50 KgCO2e Wood (Plywood) 450.12 kg 238.56 KgCO2e Operational Carbon /year 20,364.30 KgCO2e Total Embodied Carbon 3,862,797.64 KgCO2e Group: Chng Yoke Minn, Ashley Hugo Ong WEEK 06 INTERIM WEEK 06 INTERIM 89
ALTERNATIVELOW/ZEROCARBON MATERIALSRESEARCH
90
Structural 1 Engineered Bamboo 2 Cork Blocks 3 Mass Engineered Timber 4 Bamboo-reinforced Concrete 5 Ferrock 6 Green Concrete 7 Fossil Free Steel 8 Geopolymer cement 9 BFRP rebar 10 C20 Concrete Envelope 1 K-Briq 2 Recycled Plastic Rice Husk 3 3D Printed recycled plastic 4 BIPV Curtain Wall 5 Stabilised Mud Brick 6 GFRC Panel 7 Clay Brick Wall 8 Bio-based material 9 Low E Glass 10 RammedEarthWall+ReusedBrick 91
92
DISTRIBUTIONOFEMBODIEDCARBON WITHINSTRUCTURE
93
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERED BAMBOO
Structural | Engineered Bamboo
- Strongest MET on the market structurally
- 40% denser silica fiber, extremely fire resistant
- More stable in moisture and temperature changes on a cellular level
- Applications: Structural column and beam, roofs and facades, curtain walls, floor-to-ceiling frames
- Almost all engineered bamboo products are carbon negative
- 0.707KG of sequestered CO2 per 1KG of flattened bamboo in buildings
- One cubic metre of bamboo can reduce 249.92 CO2e from the atmosphere
- Bamboo already used in traditional Vietnamese architecture, growth is widespread locally
STRUCTURAL CORK BLOCKS
Structural | Cork blocks
- Expanded cork is a pure bio-material made with waste from cork forestry as it is too resinous to be used for wine corks
- By heating the granules they expand to fill a mould, and their natural resin is released, binding the granules into a solid block form.
- Negative embodied carbon, as high Co2 sequestration makes carbon footprint of material negative
- Trees are not cut down to produce it (only the bark is removed, which grows back every nine years).
- Suitable in hot and humid climates, resistant to mold
- Cork granules themselves are waterproof, when compressed to an extremely dense block, it is almost completely watertight
- Effective thermal insulation
94
STRUCTURAL MASS ENGINEERED TIMBER
Structural: Cross Laminated Timber Use
1. Cross Laminated Timber (CLT)– Layers of wood are alternating each layer at 90-degrees, its strength goes in two directions.It is predominantly used for walls, floors and roofs.
2. Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam)– Produced in a similar fashion but with the grain aligned in the same direction. This means all its strength goes in one direction, making it ideal for support structures such as trusses, columns and beams.
Structural: Cross Laminated Timber
Embodied Carbon Data
Embodied Carbon by Volume (CLT)= -608kgCO2e/m3*
Embodied Carbon by Volume (Glulam)= -570kgCO2e/m3*
Okuda, Shinya & Corpataux, Laurent & Muthukrishnan, Shravan & Kua, Harn. (2018). CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER WITH RENEWABLE, FAST-GROWING TROPICAL SPECIES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA.
Sections. Novato: ORO Editions : Goff books, 2022. https://www.istructe.org/IStructE/media/Public/TSE-Archive/2021/Timber-and-carbon-sequestration.pdf
*Lewis, Paul, Marc Tsurumaki, and David J. Lewis. Manual of
Biogenic House
95
STRUCTURAL BAMBOO REINFORCED CONCRETE
Structural: Bamboo Reinforced Concrete
Use
Sustainable alternative as reinforcement for structural concrete beams, given that steel is currently the main reinforcement material and large amounts of energy is required in its production.
Made of:
1. Bamboo Fibers
2. Epoxy-Resin Matrix
hot-pressed in a mold along the fiber direction has high tensile capacity, similar to that of steel
Sustainable source(?) for epoxy system
Structural: Bamboo Reinforced Concrete
Embodied Carbon Data Archila,
1.Greater amount of concrete needed to meet load carrying requirement of RC
2.Steel is still needed in the RC composite (shear reinforcements)
Density of Bamboo Culms = 540 to 780 kg/m3
Volume of Bamboo used in example = 182/780= 0.233m3
Embodied Carbon Data= 15.7kgCO2e
Embodied Carbon by Volume= 15.7/0.233 = 67.3 kgCO2e/m3
reinforced concrete: a critical review. Mater Struct 51, 102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6
Archila, H., Kaminski, S., Trujillo, D. et al. Bamboo
Kaminski, S., Trujillo, D. et al. Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review. Mater Struct 51, 102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6
H.,
Prototype Geographically located in Colombia so transportation emissions are disregarded.
96
STRUCTURAL GREEN CONCRETE
LOW
CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (STRUCTURAL) - GREEN CONCRETE
HISTORY
“Green concrete” is a revolutionary topic in the history of concrete industry. This was first invented in Denmark in the year 1998 by Dr.WG
DEFINITION
Green concrete is defined as a concrete which uses waste material as at least one of its components, or its production process does not lead to environmental destruction, or it has high performance and life cycle sustainability.
EMBODIED CARBON
The CO 2 produced for the manufacture of structural concrete (using ~14% cement) is estimated at 410 kg/m3 (~180 kg/tonne @ density of 2.3 g/cm3).
Green Concrete reduces this carbon production by up to 50%.
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
-Reduction of the concrete industry’s CO2-emission by 30 %.
-Increased concrete industry’s use of waste products by 20%.
-NO environmental pollution and sustainable development.
LOW
CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (STRUCTURAL) - GREEN CONCRETE
CHARACTERISTIC
->20% of the concrete shall be residual products used as aggregate
-has greater strength and durability than normal concrete
-the technology can be developed, which can reduce the CO2 emission related to concrete production
-requires less maintenance and repairs
- has better workability than conventional concrete
-good thermal resistant and fire resistant
-compressive strength behaviour of ceracrete with water cement ratio is similar to conventional concrete.
COST
For large projects, the cost of this green concrete is offset by the reduced volume of cement needed, making it no more expensive than conventional concrete.
Image source: https://www.theengineeringcommunity.org/what-is-green-concrete-its-advantages-in-construction/
Musmeci Bridge in Potenza, Italy
97
STRUCTURAL FOSSIL-FREE STEEL
LOW CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (STRUCTURAL) - FOSSIL-FREE STEEL
HISTORY
Steel is produced from iron ore through blast furnaces for the past 1,000 years, this traditional process uses coal and coke, which become carbon dioxide.
DEFINITION
Fossil-free steel is made without creating CO2 emissions and by using fossil-free energy sources.
EMBODIED CARBON
The CO 2 produced for the manufacture of Steel 1.85 tonnes CO2 per tonne of steel produced
With the manufacturing of Fossil-free steel, 10% fewer carbon dioxide emission will be produce in Sweden
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
-These effort will see it reduce emissions by 8 million tonnes a year compared with current levels.
-The primary advantage of fossil-free steel is that it is a material that has created zero CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels
LOW CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (STRUCTURAL) - FOSSIL-FREE STEEL
CHARACTERISTIC
-High yield strength
-High tensile strength
-Hardness, resistance to localized deformation
-Resistance to damage such as dents and abrasion
-Achieve greater spans without additional supports
-Weldability, wear resistance, corrosion resistance
COST
Fossil-free steel is a premium product with a higher price than regular fossil-based steel products. The main cost-drivers for fossil-free steel are the investments in production and infrastructure, to switch from coal to fossil-free electricity and hydrogen, from natural gas to biogas, and from iron ore pellets to HYBRIT sponge iron..
98
STRUCTURAL GEOPOLYMER CEMENT
Structure material
02
Process
Geopolymer cement
Portland cement
02
Structure material
Geopolymer cement
Appropriateness
High carbon footprint
ibaotu.com
Our cements make it possible to obtain a low-carbon concrete, thanks to the absence of clinker
Alkali-activated binders
These innovative processes do not involve firing, but cold chemical reactions between materials by means of activators.
Low-carbon concrete
Vietnam concrete market size is forecast to reach US$5.8 billion by 2027 after growing at a CAGR of 7.9% during 2022-2027.
赔偿!
Clinker, 95% of which is made of a conventional Portland cement (CEM I) and comes from a highly emissive process (quarrying, transport, fossil fuel firing, grinding)
99
STRUCTURAL BFRP REBAR
Structure material
02
Process
BFRP Rebar
Basalt Fibre volume fraction: 80%
Resin Matrix volume fraction: 20%
Sand Layer improve adhesion
Characteristics
Corrosion resistance
Rebar weight
You can ship seven times more product for the same cost and workers can assemble BFRP rebar mats easily, and then safely lift them into final position.
02
envelope material
BFRP Rebar
Characteristic and Data
Global warming potential of 6 mm BFRP bars, measured as kg CO2 eq, excluding transport, is 74% lower than that of steel, 22% lower than steel with 100% recycled content, 49% lower than galvanised steel, 88% lower than stainless steel and 44% lower than GFRP.
Reinforcement steel (rebar), generic, 0% recycled content (only virgin materials), A615 =22724.24 kg CO2e / m3
Estimated BFRP Rebar =5908.30 kg CO2e / m3
100
Facade | K-Briq
- 90% recycled building material (high quality, recycled sands and gravels, gypsum from waste plasterboard, and recycled pigments)
- Process: demolition/ construction waste -> compression & mixing
- Provisional calculation of embodied carbon: average 72.5 grams of CO2 per brick, or 13% of the embodied carbon of a traditional clay-fired brick (570g based on figures from the Brick Development Association)
- Exterior/ facing brick applications
- No need to fire & shorter production time
- Variety of colours
- Better insulation, keeps building cool in warm climate & bricks are traditionally used in HCMC
Facade | Rice Husk Polypropylene + (Other Rice Husk Applications)
- Rice husk (RH) is a waste product from rice cultivation; RH takes very long to decompose in manure/compost, hence it is often thrown in rivers or burned, leading to environmental consequences
- Used locally in small low-cost housing and apt in disaster relief buildings due to fast construction
- Main building products currently: Building Blocks & Roof Tiles
- Resistant to fire, provides heat/sound insulation
- Better insulation
- Water-resistant and lightweight
- Can be manufactured sustainably due to its composites of waste products
- Low CO2 emissions in manufacture process
- Can be manufactured close to site, low transport costs
101
ENVELOPE KBRIQ ENVELOPE RICE HUSK POLYPROPYLENE
ENVELOPE GLASS FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE (GFRC) PANEL
LOW CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (ENVELOPE) - GFRC(GLASS FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE PANEL)
HISTORY
GFRC was first used and originally develop in Russia but it wasn’t until the 1970s that saw its transform to its current state.
DEFINITION
Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete is a composite of cement, glass fibre, aggregates and polymers. It is concrete that use glass fiber for reinforcement instead of steel. With the things, hollow construction of GFRC products, they can weight a fraction of the weight of traditional precast concrete.
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
-GFRC has a much lower environmental impact by a factor of as high as 60% comparing to traditional precast concrete
-GFRC qualifies as sustainable as it used less cement than equivalent concrete
-Lightweight panel use 80% less material than precast
-Lightweight panel reduces fuel and costs of transportation
LOW CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (ENVELOPE) - GFRC(GLASS FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE PANEL)
CHARACTERISTIC
-Lightweight, ease of handling,reduced siteworks and transport cost including transportation of raw materials to the factory and finished products to sites.
-High compressive strength
-Durable, expected to last as long as Precast Concrete
-Adaptable to high salt and moisture content
-Achieve greater spans without additional supports
-Easier fabrication
GFRC as a material, however, is much more expensive than conventional concrete on a pound-for-pound basis. But since the cross sections can be so much thinner, that cost is overcome in most decorative elements.
COST
102
ENVELOPE CLAY BRICK WALL
LOW CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (ENVELOPE) - CLAY BRICK WALL
HISTORY
Bricks date back to 7000 BC, which makes them one of the oldest known building materials. (Mud Bricks)
Brick made from clay fired over 1000 degree celcius
DEFINITION
Clay brick wall is produced simply by mixing clay and water
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
-Brick manufacturers strive to conserve energy in the firing process, using less than 50% of the energy required to produce brick in 2004 compared to 1981. Further fuel reduction efforts since 2004 have totaled approximately 10%.
-Fuel savings since 2004 have also resulted in a reduction of approximately 145,075 tons of carbon dioxide. Air emissions are minimized with controls such as scrubbers installed on kiln exhausts.
-Brick manufacturing facilities are usually located near their source of raw materials.
LOW CARBON ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL (ENVELOPE) - CLAY BRICK WALL
CHARACTERISTIC
-Low maintenance, permanent, durable building material that won’t rot, rust, burn, corrode, decay, or encourage mold growth.
-Exterior brick walls are designed with a drainage component, or drainage cavity.
-designed to direct moisture that permeates through building materials or leaks via deficiencies in windows and other penetrations, back to the exterior.
COST
GFRC as a material, however, is much more expensive than conventional concrete on a pound-for-pound basis. But since the cross sections can be so much thinner, that cost is overcome in most decorative elements.
103
Envelope: BIPV
Envelope: BIPV Curtain Wall
The International Energy Association (IEA, 2015), estimate that the average yield of PV in the UK at optimal angle in urban areas is 920 kWh per kWp, which they state is before an annual degradation of electricity generated of 0.7%. However, to remain conservative we will apply a 0.5% degradation factor. This is the annual electricity generation that we will use for the purpose of this article. This means that each year the output of the PV system drops by 0.5%.
Each year the PV system will generate electricity, thereby reducing the load on the national electricity network. This saves carbon emissions each year over the operational lifetime of the system, which is generally taken to be 25-30 years.
Curtain
Use
Wall
Culver City Creative, Gensler
BIPV Layers
Carbon Data
embodied carbon to make Solar PV
by
in
Embodied
1.High
2.Traditionally been offset
the savings
electricity from the national grid.
Solar pv embodied carbon. (n.d.). Circular Ecology. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from https://circularecology.com/solar-pv-embodied-carbon.html
ENVELOPE BIPV CURTAIN WALL 104
Embodied Carbon for monocrystalline PV per yield = 2,560 kgCO2e/kWp
ENVELOPE
3D PRINTED RECYCLED PLASTIC
Envelope: 3D Printed Recycled Plastic Use
Berlin, Germany. 16th Sep, 2019. A new type of façade cladding was mounted on a wall in the inner courtyard of the Federal Centre of Competence for Culture and Creative Industries. BigRep, leading manufacturer of 3D printers, presented the world's first fully 3D printed environmental habitat for green plants and insects. It was made entirely from recycled plastic materials from PET bottles. Credit: Tom Weller/dpa/Alamy Live News
Envelope: 3D Printed Recycled Plastic Embodied Carbon Data
Potential Carbon Savings from using recycled PET
1.Support enhanced recycling and reuse of existing materials—for example, plastic waste can be used as an ingredient to make “green” concrete.
2.recycled plastics can substitute for high-emissions materials such as brick or steel.
Potential Carbon Savings from 3D Printing
1.The process produces a fraction of the waste of traditional construction manufacturing
2.Only requires a small factory with minimal space for storage materials
3. 3D printing does not require energy to move the same parts from one step to the next, unlike a traditional production line
Embodied Carbon for recycled PET = 0.45 kgCO2e/kg
Embodied Carbon for Virgin PET = 2.15 kgCO2e/kg
rPET reduces CO2 emissions and conserves fossil fuels
The result of the study exceeds previous assumptions. The rPET produced by PET Recycling Team GmbH in Wöllersdorf has a carbon footprint of 0.45 kg CO2 equivalent per kilogram of rPET. Virgin PET, or new material, accounts for a CO2 equivalent of 2.15 kg per kilogram. This corresponds to a CO2 equivalent of 1.7 kg or 79 per cent lower greenhouse gas emissions for rPET. Plant manager Peter Fröschel explains: ‘The savings for a single kilogram of rPET are enough to power a 13-watt bulb continuously for twenty days in the Austrian power mix.’
Banyan eco wall—The world’s first fully 3d printed, irrigated green wall—Bigrep industrial 3d printers. (2019, June 14). https://bigrep.com/posts/banyan-eco-wall/
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (n.d.). Using recycled plastics to build a more sustainable future. PwC. Retrieved January 18, 2023, from https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/strategic-foresight/sector-strategies/energy-chemical-utility-management/recycledplastics.html
105
Characteristics
1 bagasse
2 wheat hush
Appropriateness
3.agricultural byproducts and mushroom mycelium
将承担法律责任!包图网将对作品进行维权 01 envelope material Bio-based material
ibaotu.com
01 envelope material
material
thermal conductivity
insulation to heat and sound. Porosity Miantaine humidity of building, make it suitable for hot-humid climate low density 423.7kg/m3 1/8 of fired clay bricks 1/10 of concrete blocks
in the frame structure Reduce the load of structure ENVELOPE BIO-BASED MATERIAL 106
Bio-based
Low
0.27w/mk Good
Used
01 envelope material
COOL-LITE®XTREMEORAÉ®
PROCESS
Use recycled cullet and clean energy to produce glass.
The new ORAÉ® substrate has an estimated carbon footprint of only 7 kg CO2 eq/m2 (for a 4mm substrate), bringing a reduction of the carbon footprint around 40% compared to our European standard product PLANICLEAR®. Coated, processed and assembled in insulated glazing unit, the reduction is then around 25% to 30%.
Characteristic
The excellent energy performances of the COOL-LITE® XTREME coatings, which already drastically reduce carbon emissions generated by energy consumption, when using the building thanks to its high performance in terms of daylight intake, solar control and thermal insulation.
01 envelope material
COOL-LITE®XTREMEORAÉ®
Appropriateness
The country has updated its prohibitions on the import of certain waste materials.
Among the waste products to escape censure are cast iron, steel and tinned iron; and certain types of plastics, including those derived from polyethylene, polystyrene, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Cullet and other forms of glass waste have also been deemed acceptable.
107
ENVELOPE LOW E GLASS
STUDIODOCUMENTATION 108
109
MAKING 110
111
MAKING 112
113
CRITS
114
115
CRITS
116
117
AFTERCRITS
118
119
RECESS 120
121
FINALCRIT 122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
REFERENCES 131
T CHELSEA HO JIA XUAN CHEN JIAXIN CHNG YOKE MINN, ASHLEY HOU XINYAO HUGO ONG LEE YONG SOON LI PEISHAN LIU HENG MUHAMMAD ASHRAFF BIN ABDUL ALEEM SHAWN PECK WEE ANN SITI HAZIRAH BINTE HASSAN SUN JIANXIN DESIGN STUDIO ERIK G L'HEUREUX SDE LEVEL 3 STUDIO DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE M. Arch 1 Sem 02 16FEBRUARY HOTAIRIII: DENSITY,CARBON& LABOUR INTERIMREVIEW AR5802, AY 2022/2023 SEMESTER 2 Image: Victory Hotel, Huỳnh Kim Mãng Nguyễn Quang Nhạc GUESTS: GAURANGKHEMKA ONGCHANHAO ANTHONYDELACRUZ
T CHELSEA HO JIA XUAN CHEN JIAXIN CHNG YOKE MINN, ASHLEY HOU XINYAO HUGO ONG LEE YONG SOON LI PEISHAN LIU HENG MUHAMMAD ASHRAFF BIN ABDUL ALEEM SHAWN PECK WEE ANN SITI HAZIRAH BINTE HASSAN SUN JIANXIN DESIGN STUDIO ERIK G L'HEUREUX (PhD) FAIA, LEED AP BD+C DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE FINALREVIEW 20APRIL2023 8:30AM-12:30PM THEARCHITECTUREGALLERY LEVEL 1, SDE 3 HOTAIRIII: DENSITY,CARBON& LABOUR AR5802, AY 2022/2023 SEMESTER 2 Image: Ba Cheiu Market, Unknown Ar.YvetteKoh Dr.JenniferFerng Dr.JoshuaComaroff JoseClaudioSilva Guests: UniversityOfSydney YaleNUS DesignPrincipal,10Design Gensler 133
HOT AIR III M. ARCH 1 SEM 02 ERIK L’HEUREUX DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT