TAY S I D E P O L I C E
2 Information 3 Background: Delivering Local Policing 4 Introduction and guidance 6 Summary of Results
Introduction
T
his report is aligned with the objectives set in Tay-
side Policing Plan 2011-2014.
10 Policing Tayside Scorecard 13 Policing Dundee, Angus, Perth & Kinross
The objectives are focused upon
34 Public Protection
delivering a quality service to
42 Crime
local communities.
52 Road Casualties 54 Road Safety 57 Standards of Service 61 Public Perception 65 Supporting Delivery
Results are presented under the governance structure of Tayside Police Performance Framework .
DECEMBER 2011
Contents
71 Tayside Police Performance Framework
The purpose of the report is This report is currently under development and will expand to include performance information and data under the following - SERIOUS & ORGANISED CRIME
to provide the public and
COMMUNITY PRIORITIES
other stakeholders with performance results covering a broad range of policing ac-
- COUNTER TERRORISM
tivity, in accordance with
- FIREARMS
the principles of demon-
- ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
strating Best Value, thereby
VISION AND VALUES
STANDARDS
ensuring greater transpar-
OF SERVICE
ency and accountability.
REVIEW
MANAGE
ENGAGE
RESULTS
RESOURCES
AND LISTEN
Information This report is in the process of development and will ultimately reflect all the performance indicators contained in Tayside Police Performance Framework (Appendix A).
2
BACKGROUND DELIVERING LOCAL POLICING Building public confidence and trust is how Tayside Police aims to improve satisfaction with the quality of service provided to its communities. This is achieved through the effective delivery of policing services which meet the needs of local communities. It is about ease of access to services, giving the public a voice in order to influence how the force responds to issues that matter to them, delivering appropriate and robust interventions, working with partners, providing feedback to the public and keeping them informed of progress and improvement. The force uses performance indicators to gather information about performance, quality of service and public perception. These are illustrated below. Those marked with a tick also contribute to the following: The Scottish Policing Performance Framework ‘Scotland Performs’ - the National Government Framework (Single Outcome Agreements) The Force Control Strategy
INDICATORS SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME
3.
COUNTER TERRORISM
4.
FIREARMS
5.
ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
6.
CRIME
7.
ROAD POLICING/SAFETY
8.
SERVICE RESPONSE
1.
PUBLIC PROTECTION
2.
SUPPORTING DELIVERY
C
orporate support forms an important role in ensuring that appropriate resources are in place to deliver an efficient and effective service to the public.
The challenging economic climate means that robust monitoring and reporting processes are instrumental in ensuring that the force is on track to deliver its objectives within the resources available. At the same time, the Scottish Government has set stretching environmental and energy reduction targets for Scotland. As a major employer in Tayside, Tayside Police is committed to demonstrating its contribution to this aim.
MEASURES 9.
CORPORATE SUPPORT
10.
PARTNERSHIP - SCOTTISH POLICE SERVICES AUTHORITY
3
INTRODUCTION
T
HE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS within Tayside Police Performance Framework are derived from detailed policing plans and business plans prepared for 2011, outlining what the operational divisions and supporting departments intend to deliver in support of the priorities set out in Tayside Policing Plan 2011-2014. These form the basis for this performance report. The community priorities of ‘Public Safety’ and ‘Public Reassurance’ underpin the force policing plan for the next three years. The indicators under ‘Public Safety’ and ‘Public Reassurance’ arise from the force control strategy and divisional plans. The areas that have been identified as a potential threat to Tayside communities include antisocial behaviour, public protection, serious and organised crime, terrorism, roads policing/safety and firearms. The extent to which alcohol and drugs are a key influencing factor is built into analysis of results.
Analysis of data and context with respect to the performance indicators, combined with the output from public consultation, provides an indication of the extent to which the force is succeeding in contributing to improved community outcomes.
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS •
•
•
• •
Customer Satisfaction: First Contact: overall satisfaction rating Customer Satisfaction: First Contact: provided with name of call handler Customer Satisfaction: updating the public on the progress of their enquiry Customer Satisfaction: Police visibility Customer Satisfaction: overall experience of service provided
4
• • • • • • •
Crime Groups 1-4 Violent crime Robbery Vandalism Domestic Housebreaking Road Casualties Proportion of working time lost to sickness absence
CONTEXT INDICATORS are not measures of performance per se; rather they provide additional background information in relation to the demands placed upon the force and the environment in which it operates.
WHAT THESE WILL TELL US ABOUT PERFORMANCE Tayside Police Key Performance Indicators help the force define and measure progress toward the achievement of standards of service and force objectives. Monitoring results over the longer term allows the force to see where sustained improvement is developing, or to identify challenges which require to be addressed.
CONSULTING, ENGAGING AND LISTENING Public consultation and feedback runs as a thread throughout the performance framework and provides the information that lets the force know whether it is doing things right. ‘Customers’ include our staff.
BENCHMARKS Where information is available, Tayside Police performance is shown in relation to the most recent results from other forces or partner agencies.
GUIDANCE INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
B
aselines for improvement adopt the methodology used in previous years, incorporating the most recent three years average performance.
The following broad rules are applied to control charts to highlight causal factors other than random variations operating within the recorded data: •
For some KPIs an adjusted improvement target was agreed rather than the straight three-year average. This takes account of developing trends or patterns over the last 36 months and adjusts the target up or down accordingly. Improvement Targets are agreed annually through a process of consultation with divisional commanders and heads of departments. These are ratified through the force Performance Committee chaired by the Deputy Chief Constable.
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Results are colour-coded against the following criteria: On or above target Below target
Control charts are shown for reported crime. These are monitored on a monthly basis. The charts set 'controls' described as Upper Control Limits (UCL) and Lower Control Limits (LCL). Applying statistical formulae to historical data defines the control limits. These are currently set at 2 standard deviations from the mean (average) for the years 2008/09 to 2010/11. This means that results lying outwith these limits should be regarded as significant and would benefit from further investigation as to whether the outcome was the result of a known causal factor as opposed to random fluctuation.
• •
any point that lies outside the UCL or LCL six or more consecutive points running upwards or downwards seven or more consecutive points zigzagging above or below the mean.
PERFORMANCE REPORTING Where performance is adhering to the ‘norm’, i.e. remaining within upper and lower control limits, minimal reporting takes place. Areas of concern or exceptional performance, lying outside the upper or lower control limits, is commented upon. In addition, areas of police business not contained within the key performance indicators (such as fleet, health and safety, staff development) are reported on with a view to producing a balanced view of organisational activity. This promotes the diverse range of services that support operational policing. PUBLICATION OF PERFORMANCE RESULTS This document is published monthly on the force web-site in accordance with the statutory requirement under Section 13 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 2003 which covers public performance reporting in relation to the publication of performance information and evidence of continuous improvement. An abbreviated ‘Performance Scorecard’ is published by the seventh working day of each month on the force web site.
5
Summary of results: April - December 2011 1.
STANDARDS OF SERVICE
Two out of four customer satisfaction targets were achieved for the period April to December 2011 and both in relation to first contact. Overall satisfaction at first contact evidenced a significant 3.1 percentage point improvement compared to the same period the previous year rising from 90.8% to 93.9% and exceeded the 2011/12 target by 2.4 percentage points.
•
The percentage of respondents who were provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry rose 3.2 percentage points from 81.8% to 85.0%, which exceeded the target set at 80.0% for this indicator.
•
An upward trend continued in relation to the service user receiving an update on the progress of their enquiry rising 0.5 percentage points to 60.6%, albeit this result still fell short of the target set at 65.0%.
2.
able to identify their local officer by sight or name, knew how to contact them should the need arise. 22.4% of residents were able to recognise their community officer either by name, sight or both. 66.3% of service users agreed that officers understood the issues that mattered in their neighbourhoods and 59.8% felt that officers were dealing with such matters. Overall, 66.5% of respondents had confidence in the police in their neighbourhood. Taking everything into account, 68.5% of service users thought that community officers were doing a ‘good’ or ‘very good’ job in their area.
CRIME
Performance in relation to overall crime groups : Satisfaction with the overall service provided by Tayside Police failed to achieve the target of 85.0% but returned an improvement of 0.7 percentage points compared to the commensurate figure the previous year, rising from 82.1% to 82.8%.
− Violent crime (Group 1) - a decrease of 2.1%
(9 crimes) − Crimes of indecency (Group 2) - an increase
of 12.2% (36 crimes) − Crimes of dishonesty (Group 3) - a reduction
of 18.1% (1582 crimes) − Malicious mischief, vandalism etc (Group 4)
A ‘community policing’ section has been included in the Service Satisfaction survey since the beginning of October and the following paragraphs summarise the findings. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at this stage due to the small sample size (n=261). The same bank of questions have been replicated in the Public Perception survey with the results reported later in the document. •
•
•
a reduction of 22.5% (993 crimes) (Data was sourced directly from Apex crime reporting system on 3 January and may differ slightly to other published results due to some reclassification of crimes and any additional ‘no crime’ status being applied in the intervening period.)
The force achieved 6 out of 10 crime-related targets. This included an overall reduction in Groups 1-4 crime of almost 19% (2548 crimes).
51.8% of service users thought that the current level of police patrols in their neighbourhood was ‘about right’ for their community needs. Conversely, 47.7% felt it was ‘too little’ and a minimal 0.5% that it was ‘too much’. The majority of respondents, 76.0%, felt reassured when they witnessed an officer on patrol in their neighbourhood. Over half of the respondents confirmed that they knew nothing about the community officers who looked after their neighbourhood, 57.9%, whilst a further 19.7%, although un-
Other improvements included a reduction in domestic housebreaking of 28.0% (192 crimes) and vandalism of 22.5% (922 crimes). Improvements in detection rates included Groups 1-4 from 45.5% recorded last year to 47.4%, robbery from 64.1% to 67.8% and domestic housebreaking from 29.9% to 36.0%. The detection rate for violent crime was marginally lower and for vandalism had fallen from 32.0% to 30.8%. Four crime areas did not meet target - violent crime recorded and the detection rates for violent crime, robbery and vandalism.
6
3.
The main issues of concern to residents when asked unprompted was ‘antisocial behaviour’, 22.1% (22.3%), closely followed by ‘dangerous/ careless driving’, 21.0% (21.3%), and ‘drug dealing or drug abuse’, 13.4% (14.8%). This provides a similar representation of concerns as in the previous year with only ‘antisocial behaviour’ and ‘dangerous/careless driving’ changing position.
TELEPHONE RESPONSE
Between April and December 2011, the number of calls answered with 10 seconds failed to achieve the national target figure of 90%. However, the results in recent months have rallied and the 86.9% recorded at the end of December was the highest result recorded since March 2011. 92.8% of calls were answered within 10 seconds at the end of December 2010.
4.
In terms of prevalence of crime in local neighbourhoods, almost half of all respondents, 44.6% (44.8%) said that ‘antisocial behaviour’ was a common problem in their local area, followed by ‘vandalism/graffiti’, 36.9% (37.1%) and ‘dangerous/ careless driving’, 33.4% (38.3%). This reflects a slight shift in opinion from the previous year whereby ‘dangerous/careless driving’ featured ahead of ‘vandalism/graffiti’.
SICKNESS ABSENCE
The absence rate for police officers was 3.9% for the period and met the target of 4.0%. The police staff result at 3.7% was well ahead of the 4.7% recorded last year and also surpassed the target (4.5%) by a considerable margin.
5.
37.4% (36.0%) of respondents confirmed that they were concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their area and when asked to comment on the issues which caused them concern, ‘housebreaking’, 50.3% (42.6%), followed by ‘antisocial behaviour’, 44.8% (44.5%), were the major issues of concern.
ROAD CASUALTIES
Between April and December sixteen fatalities were recorded, 36% fewer than the 25 people killed during the same period last year. Sadly, one of the 4 fatalities in the month of November was a child; the first child killed on the roads of Tayside since November 2008.
Feelings of safety walking alone in local neighbourhoods during the day evidenced a slight dip in confidence in 2011 compared to 2010 whereby 94.8% (96.0%) of residents felt safe. Conversely an improvement of 1.6 percentage points was recorded in relation to feelings of safety after dark rising from 61.3% to 62.9%.
A further 154 people were seriously injured (141 last year), of which 19 were children. By the end of December, the total number of people killed or seriously injured (170) was 2% more than at the same time last year (166).
A ‘community policing’ section has been included in the Public Perception survey since the beginning of October and the following paragraphs summarise the findings. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results due to the small sample size (n=273). Results for the corresponding questions in the Service Satisfaction survey have been included in parenthesis for comparison purposes.
From April 2011, the force adopted the government’s Road Safety Framework Targets to the year 2020.
6.
PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF CRIME
91.3% of respondents in Tayside perceived their neighbourhood to be a safe place to live. This indicates a minimal 0.8 percentage point improvement compared to the previous year when 90.5% of respondents were of the same opinion.
• 45.0% (51.8%) of residents thought that the cur-
rent level of police patrols in their neighbourhood was ‘about right’ for their community needs. Conversely, 55.0% (47.7%) felt it was ‘too little’. • 62.8% (76.0%) of respondents felt reassured when they witnessed an officer on patrol in their neighbourhood. • Over three quarters of respondents confirmed that they knew nothing about the community officers who looked after their neighbourhood,
Whilst opinions remained static between 2011 and 2010 in relation to those who felt that crime levels had remained the same during the year 59.2%, a 0.7 percentage point improvement was recorded for those who felt that crime had decreased rising from 12.1% to 12.8% and similarly, a 0.6 percentage point reduction in those who felt that crime had increased, falling from 28.6% to 28.0%.
7
75.9% (57.9%), whilst a further 12.8% (19.7%), although not able to identify their local officer by sight or name, knew how to contact them should the need arise. 11.3% (22.4%) of residents were able to recognise their community officer either by name, sight or both. • 52.1% (66.3%) of respondents agreed that officers understood the issues that mattered in their neighbourhoods and 46.9% (59.8%) felt that officers were dealing with such matters. Overall, almost two thirds of residents had confidence in the police in their neighbourhood, 60.3% (66.5%). • Taking everything into account, 57.2% (68.5%) of residents thought that community officers were doing a ‘good’ or ‘very good’ job in their area. It can be seen from the above information that service users (Service Satisfaction survey) appear to have a greater awareness, than members of the general public (Public Perception survey), of the community officers who look after their neighbourhood and also an increased confidence in the officers’ abilities to deal with the issues that matter to them in their communities. When asked to provide views on the force’s service delivery, first in terms of the importance of certain activities and then how well those activities are performed, the greatest disparity in opinion between importance and effectiveness related to police visibility. This suggests that ‘providing a visible presence’ is the main area of policing which the public perceive Tayside Police should improve going forward.
8
POLICING TAYSIDE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Tayside Land Area: 2,896 square miles Population: 399,550 Police Officers: 1231 Police Staff: 505 Special Constables: 169 Based upon mid year data as at 30 June 2011
9
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS SCORECARD APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 POLICING ANGUS
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
3.1
91.5% 91.3% 88.7%
2.6
91.5%
91.8%
92.1%
-0.3
91.5% 97.4%
91.2%
6.2
80.0% 85.0% 81.8%
3.2
80.0% 80.7% 82.2%
-1.5
80.0%
84.3%
79.6%
4.7
80.0% 88.9%
83.4%
5.5
65.0% 60.6% 60.1%
0.5
65.0% 56.0% 59.5%
-3.5
65.0%
59.7%
57.5%
2.2
65.0% 64.8%
63.0%
1.8
85.0% 82.8% 82.1%
0.7
85.0% 79.5% 83.5%
-4.0
85.0%
83.0%
82.5%
0.5
85.0% 85.2%
80.6%
4.6
10
882/2700 (32.7%)
293/972 (30.1%)
226/756 (29.9%)
2011-12 Result
2011-12 Target
91.5% 93.9% 90.8%
(Response Rate)
2011-12 Target
%/pp Change
Customer Experience: Overall satisfaction rating of the service provided by Tayside Police
2010-11 Result
received an update on the progress of their enquiry
2011-12 Result
Updating the Public:% of customers who
POLICING DUNDEE
2011-12 Target
the name of the person dealing with their enquiry
% / pp Change
First Contact:% of respondents provided with
2010-11 Result
First Contact: Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact
2011-12 Result
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
POLICING TAYSIDE
2011-12 Target
KEY On or above target Below target
363/972 (37.3%)
CRIME Groups 1-4 recorded
17950
- Detection rate
46.5% 47.4% 45.5%
1.9
411
-2.1%
Violent Crime recorded - Detection rate Robbery recorded
540
11297 13845 -18.4%
420
85.0% 83.7% 83.8%
-0.1
87
-15.5%
156
103
- Detection rate
70.0% 67.8% 64.1%
3.7
Vandalism recorded
5400
3182
-22.5%
- Detection rate
32.0% 30.8% 32.0%
-1.2
494
-28.0%
Domestic Housebreaking recorded - Detection rate
775
4104
686
30.0% 36.0% 29.9%
6.1
-24.7%
3650
2413
2845
-15.2%
45.5% 46.9% 42.9%
4
49.0%
45.0%
50.8%
-5.8
220
-2.7%
100
79
74
6.8%
75.0% 79.5% 74.8%
4.7
96.0%
82.3%
86.5%
-4.2
51
-26.1%
8
10
5
100.0%
62.0% 58.8% 50.7%
8.1
85.0%
60.0%
80.0%
-20
1567
-31.0%
1260
867
962
-9.9%
27.5% 29.0% 28.3%
0.7
37.0%
30.7%
38.9%
-8.2
297
-39.1%
90
74
82
-9.8%
10.2
40.0%
39.2%
51.2%
-12.0
10000
285
110
3000
545
5806
7713
226
69
2272
488
26.0% 34.0% 23.8%
4300
3078
48.0% 50.2% 155
112
92.0% 92.9% 38
26
80.0% 88.5% 1140
748
36.0% 34.5% 140
123
40.0% 39.0%
3287
-6.4%
47.0%
3.2
120
-6.7%
99.2%
-6.3
29
-10.3%
93.1%
-4.6
870
-14.0%
34.0%
0.5
116
6.0%
40.5%
-1.5
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS SCORECARD APRIL-DECEMBER 2011 continued POLICING TAYSIDE
KEY On or above 3 year average
POLICING DUNDEE
POLICING ANGUS
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
2011-12 Target
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
% / pp Change
2011-12 Target
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Target
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Target
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
People killed
28
16
25
-36.0%
N/A
0
3
-100.0%
N/A
4
6
-33.3%
N/A
12
16
-25.0%
People seriously injured
248
154
141
9.2%
N/A
42
33
27.3%
N/A
42
42
0.0%
N/A
70
66
6.1%
Children killed
1
1
0
#DIV/0!
N/A
0
0
#DIV/0!
N/A
0
0
#DIV/0!
N/A
1
0
#DIV/0!
Children seriously injured
29
19
18
5.6%
N/A
10
9
11.1%
N/A
6
6
0.0%
N/A
3
3
0.0%
Sickness Absence - police officers
4.0%
3.9%
4.0%
-0.1
4.0%
3.4%
3.8%
-0.4
4.0%
5.5%
5.6%
-0.1
4.0%
4.3%
4.1%
0.2
Sickness Absence - police staff
4.5%
3.9%
4.6%
-0.7
4.5%
3.8%
3.5%
0.3
4.5%
5.6%
4.2%
1.4
4.5%
2.7%
5.6%
-2.9
Below 3 year average
ROAD CASUALTIES
11
RESOURCES
Finance - Variance from budget
COMMUNITY PRIORITIES
VISION AND VALUES
STANDARDS OF SERVICE
REVIEW RESULTS
MANAGE RESOURCES
ENGAGE AND LISTEN
TAYSIDE CRIME IN MORE DETAIL PERIOD APRIL to DECEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2010/2011 Made known
2011/2012
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others GROUP 1 - TOTAL
0 36 0 199 103 43 5 20 12 2
0 35 0 173 66 42 5 19 11 1
97.2% 86.9% 64.1% 97.7% 100.0% 95.0% 91.7% 50.0%
8 57 0 174 87 60 5 8 9 3
7 54 0 141 59 63 3 7 7 3
87.5% 94.7% 81.0% 67.8% 105.0% 60.0% 87.5% 77.8% 100.0%
8 21 0 -25 -16 17 0 -12 -3 1
58.3% -12.6% -15.5% 39.5% 0.0% -60.0% -25.0% 50.0%
420
352
83.8%
411
344
83.7%
-9
-2.1%
42 8 115 50 28 53
17 5 81 44 18 43
40.5% 62.5% 70.4% 88.0% 64.3% 81.1%
59 2 163 28 37 43
37 1 100 17 17 38
62.7% 50.0% 61.3% 60.7% 45.9% 88.4%
17 -6 48 -22 9 -10
40.5% -75.0% 41.7% -44.0% 32.1% -18.9%
296
208
70.3%
332
210
63.3%
36
12.2%
686 279 379 211 506 351 11 179 5269 267 34 34 427 84
205 85 135 73 90 175 11 121 2945 57 34 25 271 43
29.9% 30.5% 35.6% 34.6% 17.8% 49.9% 100.0% 67.6% 55.9% 21.3% 100.0% 73.5% 63.5% 51.2%
494 192 255 133 302 232 14 173 4598 241 42 14 377 68
178 30 92 36 90 119 14 137 2627 90 42 18 223 11
36.0% 15.6% 36.1% 27.1% 29.8% 51.3% 100.0% 79.2% 57.1% 37.3% 100.0% 128.6% 59.2% 16.2%
-192 -87 -124 -78 -204 -119 3 -6 -671 -26 8 -20 -50 -16
-28.0% -31.2% -32.7% -37.0% -40.3% -33.9% 27.3% -3.4% -12.7% -9.7% 23.5% -58.8% -11.7% -19.0%
8717
4270
49.0%
7135
3707
52.0%
-1582
-18.1%
161 4104 147
49 1312 108
30.4% 32.0% 73.5%
124 3182 113
35 979 78
28.2% 30.8% 69.0%
-37 -922 -34
-23.0% -22.5% -23.1%
4412
1469
33.3%
3419
1092
31.9%
-993
-22.5%
13845
6299
45.5%
11297
5353
47.4%
-2548
-18.4%
150 7 260 51 0 632 294 326 1534 32 77
149 7 259 48 3 617 274 325 1535 31 75
99.3% 100.0% 99.6% 94.1% 97.6% 93.2% 99.7% 100.1% 96.9% 97.4%
72 10 227 93 3 609 249 214 1718 47 85
73 10 229 91 3 600 239 213 1721 50 75
101.4% 100.0% 100.9% 97.8% 100.0% 98.5% 96.0% 99.5% 100.2% 106.4% 88.2%
-78 3 -33 42 3 -23 -45 -112 184 15 8
-52.0% 42.9% -12.7% 82.4% -3.6% -15.3% -34.4% 12.0% 46.9% 10.4%
3363
3323
98.8%
3327
3304
99.3%
-36
-1.1%
17208
9622
55.9%
14624
8657
59.2%
-2584
-15.0%
GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
12
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 POLICING DUNDEE
SECTION 1 City Centre and Maryfield
SECTION 2 Lochee and Ryehill
SECTION 3 Downfield and Hilltown
SECTION 4 Longhaugh and Broughty Ferry
2010-11 Result
% / pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
5806
7711
-24.7%
1591
2288
-30.5%
1421
1804
-21.2%
1470
1727
-14.9%
1324
1892
-30.0%
- Detection rate
46.9%
42.9%
4
57.6%
53.2%
4.4
44.4%
40.5%
3.9
42.7%
40.4%
2.3
41.2%
34.9%
6.3
220
226
-2.7%
58
68
-14.7%
60
46
30.4%
52
41
26.8%
50
71
-29.6%
- Detection rate
79.5%
74.8%
4.7
74.1%
72.1%
2
83.3%
71.7%
11.6
76.9%
85.4%
-8.5
84.0%
73.2%
10.8
Indecency (G2)
174
143
21.7%
64
59
8.5%
40
24
66.7%
39
32
21.9%
31
28
10.7%
- Detection rate
57.5%
60.8%
-3.3
70.3%
78.0%
-7.7
55.0%
41.7%
13.3
53.8%
46.9%
6.9
38.7%
57.1%
-18.4
Dishonesty (G3)
3721
4889
-23.9%
1161
1635
-29.0%
951
1174
-19.0%
885
1014
-12.7%
724
1066
-32.1%
- Detection rate
52.1%
47.7%
4.4
63.6%
58.8%
4.8
48.8%
46.1%
2.7
43.4%
38.8%
4.6
48.5%
41.0%
7.5
Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4)
1691
2453
-31.1%
308
526
-41.4%
370
560
-33.9%
494
640
-22.8%
519
727
-28.6%
- Detection rate
30.1%
29.3%
0.8
29.5%
30.6%
-1.1
25.7%
26.3%
-0.6
37.0%
39.8%
-2.8
27.0%
21.5%
5.5
51
69
-26.1%
15
27
-44.4%
16
14
14.3%
11
16
-31.3%
9
12
-25.0%
- Detection rate
58.8%
50.7%
8.1
40.0%
59.3%
-19.3
68.8%
35.7%
33.1
63.6%
68.8%
-5.2
66.7%
25.0%
41.7
Vandalism
1567
2271
-31.0%
284
485
-41.4%
336
521
-35.5%
449
588
-23.6%
498
677
-26.4%
- Detection rate
29.0%
28.3%
0.7
27.5%
27.0%
0.5
25.0%
25.9%
-0.9
36.3%
40.0%
-3.7
25.7%
20.5%
5.2
297
488
-39.1%
36
93
-61.3%
74
109
-32.1%
104
133
-21.8%
83
153
-45.8%
34.0%
23.8%
10.2
33.3%
24.7%
8.6
24.3%
18.3%
6
30.8%
32.3%
-1.5
47.0%
19.6%
27.4
Violent Crime (G1)
13
Robbery
Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate
Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.
POLICING DUNDEE
2011-12 Result
Groups 1-4
CRIME
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 SECTION 3 Downfield and Hilltown
SECTION 4 Longhaugh and Broughty Ferry
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
% / pp Change
Response Rate
2010-11 Result
14
First Contact % of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry Updating the Public % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry Customer Experience Overall satisfaction rating of the service provided by Tayside Police
2011-12 Result
First Contact Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact
2011-12 Target
Customer Satisfaction
SECTION 2 Lochee and Ryehill
91.5%
91.3% 88.7%
2.6
95.1% 88.9%
6.2
92.8% 86.7%
6.1
89.6% 86.8%
2.8
90.0% 92.7%
-2.7
80.0%
80.7% 82.2%
-1.5
83.3% 85.2%
-1.9
81.3% 76.2%
5.1
81.5% 80.5%
1.0
78.2% 88.9%
-10.7
65.0%
56.0% 59.5%
-3.5
64.1% 70.4%
-6.3
58.1% 50.0%
8.1
55.4% 66.7%
-11.3
50.0% 54.4%
-4.4
85.0%
79.5% 83.5%
-4.0
87.2% 84.9%
2.3
80.0% 80.2%
-0.2
76.1% 86.1%
-10.0
78.5% 83.6%
-5.1
293/972 (30.1%)
47/179 (26.3%)
75/242 (31.0%)
Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the small sub-sample sizes. First Contact - Improvement in satisfaction with service at first contact from 88.7% to 91.3% - Reduction in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 82.2% to 80.7% Updating the Public - Reduction in updating the public from 59.5% to 56.0% Customer Experience - Reduction in overall customer experience from 83.5% to 79.5%.
90/288 (31.3%)
81/263 (30.8%)
Policing Dundee: Standards of Service ~ April - December 2011
SECTION 1 City Centre and Maryfield
POLICING DUNDEE
DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION - APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 SECTION 1 City Centre and Maryfield
SECTION 2 Lochee and Ryehill
SECTION 3 Downfield and Hilltown
SECTION 4 Longhaugh and Broughty Ferry
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
% / pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year
73.4%
61.1%
12.3
72.0%
63.6%
8.4
67.3%
55.3%
12.0
69.8%
59.2%
10.6
83.3%
66.7%
16.6
Feelings of safety after dark % of residents who felt safe walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark
49.1%
45.7%
3.4
45.4%
34.9%
10.5
38.1%
49.0%
-10.9
45.2%
43.5%
1.7
62.5%
52.4%
10.1
Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood
54.3%
51.2%
3.1
54.5%
61.9%
-7.4
61.9%
50.0%
11.9
56.7%
59.3%
-2.6
46.1%
36.7%
9.4
Public Perception
15
Issues that cause most concern in neighbourhoods *Other includes: Litter, Dog Fouling, Fly tipping etc
Response Rate
Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Dangerous/careless driving Housebreaking Other* Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Assault Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Robbery
Dangerous/careless driving Housebreaking Drug dealing/drug abuse Antisocial behaviour Other Vandalism/graffiti Assault Cause no concern: Robbery Alcohol related crime Motor vehicle crime
Drug dealing/drug abuse Housebreaking Antisocial behaviour Other Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Dangerous/careless driving Assault Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Robbery
Dangerous/careless driving Drug dealing/drug abuse Antisocial behaviour Other Housebreaking Vandalism/graffiti Assault Alcohol related crime Cause no concern: Robbery Motor vehicle crime
Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Drug dealing/drug abuse Other Housebreaking Assault Cause no concern: Robbery Motor vehicle crime
247/972 (25.4%)
36/179 (20.1%)
67/238 (28.2%)
63/259 (24.3%)
81/296 (27.4%)
Policing Dundee: Public Perception ~ April - December 2011
POLICING DUNDEE
Policing Dundee: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 SECTION 1: MARYFIELD
CITY
CENTRE
AND −
Main areas of public concern: dangerous/ careless driving and housebreaking
−
Crime Overall reduction of 30.5% in Groups 1-4 crime ( 697 crimes). • Reduction in crimes of dishonesty of 29% (474 crimes). • Biggest reduction in Division in vandalism of 41.4% (201 crimes). • Biggest reduction in Division in domestic housebreaking of 61.3% (57 crimes). •
−
−
alcohol related disorder and other forms of anti social behaviour. High profile and plain-clothes patrols and multiagency approach to tackle prostitution and kerb crawling. Use of Special Constables to assist in dealing with youth disorder and vandalisms under the Stobswell Action Plan. Work in partnership to address anti social behaviour generally, acquisitive crime, housebreaking and drugs enforcement. Community engagement enhancements such as increased use of social media networking.
Efforts to improve performance in relation to updating the public on the progress of their enquiries will be addressed through briefing to supervisors and lead constables to remind all officers of force standards of service.
Detection rate Best detection rate across the Division for Groups 1-4 at 57.6%, a 4 percentage point improvement over last year. • Best detection rate across Division for crimes of dishonesty at 63.6%, an improvement over the 58.1% recorded last month. •
SECTION 2: LOCHEE AND RYEHILL Main areas of public concern: drug dealing/drug abuse and housebreaking
Standards of Service Decrease in proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 70.4% recorded last year to 64.1%, a further fall from the previous month at 66.7%, however still the highest result recorded across the Division. • Best result across the Division with an improvement in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police at 87.2%, and exceeding the divisional target of 85%. •
Crime • Overall reduction of 21.2% in Groups 1-4 crime (337 crimes). • Increase of 30.4% in violence, from 46 crimes recorded last year up to 60. • Increase of 66.7% in crimes of indecency from 24 recorded last year up to 40. • Reduction of 35.5% in vandalism(185 crimes). • Reduction of 32.1% in domestic housebreaking (35 crimes).
Public Perception* Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 63.6% recorded last year to 72%. • Similar positive results with respect to people feeling safe after dark rising from 34.9% last year to 45.4% for the current equivalent period.
Detection rate Improvement in detection rate for housebreaking from 18.3% to 24.3%
•
•
Standards of Service Improvement of 8.1 percentage points in updating the public, from 50.0% to 58.1%
•
Public Perception* Improvement of 12 percentage points in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 55.3% recorded last year to 67.3% • Drop in the proportion of people feeling safe after dark, from 49% to 38.1% (40.4% last month) • Similar scenario with respect to concern about
Targeted Community Activity
•
All sectional activity has progressed according to plan in terms of policing initiatives and proactive style of policing. This included: −
Operation Centre Safe utilised during weekend evenings to prevent incidents of violent crime,
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
16
Policing Dundee: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 becoming a victim of crime, increasing from 50% to 61.9% (56.6% last month), the worst result across the Division
Detection rate • Best detection rate for domestic HB across Division, significant improvement from 27.4% to 47%, a further improvement on the 44% recorded last month
SECTION 3: DOWNFIELD AND HILLTOWN
Standards of Service • Decrease of 4.4 percentage points in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry, from 54.4% recorded last year to 50%, the lowest result across Division • Decrease of 5.1 percentage points in satisfaction with the overall customer experience, from 83.6% recorded last year to 78.5%
Main areas of public concern: dangerous/ careless driving and drug dealing/drug abuse Crime Overall reduction of 14.9% in Groups 1-4 crime (257 crimes) • Reduction of 23.6% in vandalism (139 crimes) • Reduction of 21.8% in domestic housebreaking (29 crimes) •
Public Perception*
Detection rate • Highest detection rate in division for vandalism at 36.3%
• Substantial improvement in the proportion of peo-
ple who thought crime in the neighbourhood had decreased or remained the same, from 66.7% recorded last year to 83.3%, the best result across the Division • Similar improvement in people feeling safe after dark, from 52.4% to 62.5%, the best result across the Division • Conversely, concern about becoming a victim of crime rose from 36.7% to 46.1%, but was still the best result across the Division
Standards of Service • Decrease in proportion of people who stated they
had received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 66.7% recorded last year to 55.4% • Decrease in overall customer satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 86.1% recorded last year to 76.1% Public Perception* • Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had decreased or remained the same, from 59.2% recorded last year to 69.8%
SECTION 4: LONGHAUGH BROUGHTY FERRY
ROAD POLICING UNIT Inspector Gordon Taylor said: “It is appreciated that the numbers are relatively low hence any variance will show as a relatively high percentage change.
AND
Whilst it is extremely encouraging to see that there have been no fatalities on Dundee Roads over this period there has been an increase in the other injury classes, particularly the serious category where 7 more serious injuries were recorded between April and December 2011 than in the same months of 2010.
Main areas of public concern: antisocial behaviour and dangerous/careless driving Crime • Reduction in Groups 1-4 crime of 30% (568
crimes) • Biggest reduction in Division in violent crime
Analysis is ongoing into these incidents in an effort to identify whether further measures or prevention strategies can be implemented to reduce these incidents. Initial findings appear to indicate that the increase in serious injury collisions involve adult pedestrians, motorcycle riders and car drivers. The analysis and investigations in respect of all injury collisions continues with the aforesaid aim in mind.”
(29.6%, 21 crimes) • Biggest reduction in Division in crimes of dishonesty of 32.1% (342 crimes) set against an improved detection rate from 41% to 48.5% • Reduction in vandalism of 26.4% (179 crimes) • Reduction in domestic housebreaking of 45.8% (70 crimes)
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents
17
POLICING DUNDEE: Crime in more detail PERIOD APRIL to DECEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2010/2011 Made known
2011/2012
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others
0 19 0 99 69 18 3 12 5 1
0 18 0 77 35 19 3 12 5 0
94.7% 77.8% 50.7% 105.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
1 27 0 102 51 26 5 4 1 3
1 25 0 80 30 29 3 3 1 3
100.0% 92.6% 78.4% 58.8% 111.5% 60.0% 75.0% 100.0% 100.0%
1 8 0 3 -18 8 2 -8 -4 2
42.1% 3.0% -26.1% 44.4% 66.7% -66.7% -80.0% 200.0%
226
169
74.8%
220
175
79.5%
-6
-2.7%
23 4 40 20 20 36
10 3 19 9 13 33
43.5% 75.0% 47.5% 45.0% 65.0% 91.7%
32 0 70 18 16 38
17 0 31 11 8 33
53.1% 44.3% 61.1% 50.0% 86.8%
9 -4 30 -2 -4 2
39.1% -100.0% 75.0% -10.0% -20.0% 5.6%
143
87
60.8%
174
100
57.5%
31
21.7%
488 168 135 100 363 199 10 76 2917 133 24 16 209 52
116 52 46 36 56 81 10 44 1697 22 24 8 127 15
23.8% 31.0% 34.1% 36.0% 15.4% 40.7% 100.0% 57.9% 58.2% 16.5% 100.0% 50.0% 60.8% 28.8%
297 106 114 54 179 123 12 83 2421 105 24 5 157 41
101 17 28 11 48 54 12 67 1443 29 24 9 92 2
34.0% 16.0% 24.6% 20.4% 26.8% 43.9% 100.0% 80.7% 59.6% 27.6% 100.0% 180.0% 58.6% 4.9%
-191 -62 -21 -46 -184 -76 2 7 -496 -28 0 -11 -52 -11
-39.1% -36.9% -15.6% -46.0% -50.7% -38.2% 20.0% 9.2% -17.0% -21.1% 0.0% -68.8% -24.9% -21.2%
4890
2334
47.7%
3721
1937
52.1%
-1169
-23.9%
101 2272 81
23 642 54
22.8% 28.3% 66.7%
60 1567 64
15 455 39
25.0% 29.0% 60.9%
-41 -705 -17
-40.6% -31.0% -21.0%
GROUP 4 - TOTAL
2454
719
29.3%
1691
509
30.1%
-763
-31.1%
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
7713
3309
42.9%
5806
2721
46.9%
-1907
-24.7%
77 0 100 25 0 314 168 135 752 21 51
76 0 100 22 3 301 154 135 746 19 49
98.7% 100.0% 88.0% 95.9% 91.7% 100.0% 99.2% 90.5% 96.1%
43 4 99 59 2 332 147 133 791 25 56
44 4 100 58 2 324 140 132 792 28 51
102.3% 100.0% 101.0% 98.3% 100.0% 97.6% 95.2% 99.2% 100.1% 112.0% 91.1%
-34 4 -1 34 2 18 -21 -2 39 4 5
-44.2% -1.0% 136.0% 5.7% -12.5% -1.5% 5.2% 19.0% 9.8%
GROUP 5 - TOTAL
1643
1605
97.7%
1691
1675
99.1%
48
2.9%
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
9356
4914
52.5%
7497
4396
58.6%
-1859
-19.9%
GROUP 1 - TOTAL
GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others
GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
18
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir
POLICING ANGUS
SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin
SECTION 3
SECTION 4
Arbroath
Carnoustie
2010-11 Result
% / pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2410
2845
-15.3%
693
835
-17.0%
540
766
-29.5%
884
972
-9.1%
293
272
7.7%
- Detection rate
45.0%
50.8%
-5.8
40.0%
46.6%
-6.6
47.8%
56.7%
-8.9
50.9%
51.6%
-0.7
34.8%
44.5%
-9.7
79
74
6.8%
16
20
-20.0%
12
17
-29.4%
39
25
56.0%
12
12
0.0%
- Detection rate
82.3%
86.5%
-4.2
62.5%
80.0%
-17.5
100.0%
82.4%
17.6
87.2%
92.0%
-4.8
75.0%
91.7%
-16.7
Indecency (G2)
85
87
-2.3%
19
17
11.8%
17
30
-43.3%
40
21
90.5%
9
19
-52.6%
- Detection rate
70.9%
89.7%
-18.8
84.2%
41.2%
43
76.5%
90.0%
-13.5
67.5%
128.6%
-61.1
55.6%
89.5%
-33.9
Dishonesty (G3)
1340
1653
-18.9%
415
541
-23.3%
299
392
-23.7%
497
595
-16.5%
129
125
3.2%
- Detection rate
49.7%
53.7%
-4
43.4%
49.9%
-6.5
54.8%
56.6%
-1.8
57.1%
57.0%
0.1
30.2%
44.8%
-14.6
906
1031
-12.1%
243
257
-5.4%
212
327
-35.2%
308
331
-6.9%
143
116
23.3%
32.4%
40.4%
-8
29.2%
37.4%
-8.2
32.5%
52.3%
-19.8
34.1%
34.1%
0
34.3%
31.9%
2.4
10
5
100.0%
2
3
-33.3%
1
0
***
5
2
150.0%
2
0
***
60.0%
80.0%
-20
0.0%
66.7%
-66.7
100.0%
0.0%
100
80.0%
100.0%
-20
50.0%
0.0%
50
866
962
-10.0%
234
239
-2.1%
195
314
-37.9%
295
302
-2.3%
142
107
32.7%
30.7%
38.9%
-8.2
27.8%
36.8%
-9
29.2%
51.9%
-22.7
32.5%
30.8%
1.7
33.8%
28.0%
5.8
74
82
-9.8%
30
31
-3.2%
20
22
-9.1%
17
25
-32.0%
7
4
75.0%
39.2%
51.2%
-12
40.0%
48.4%
-8.4
35.0%
54.5%
-20
47.1%
56.0%
-8.9
28.6%
25.0%
3.6
Violent Crime (G1)
19
Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4) - Detection rate Robbery - Detection rate Vandalism - Detection rate Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate
Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.
POLICING ANGUS
2011-12 Result
Groups 1-4
CRIME
SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir
POLICING ANGUS
SECTION 3 Arbroath
SECTION 4 Carnoustie
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
% / pp Change
Response Rate
2010-11 Result
20
First Contact % of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry Updating the Public % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry Customer Experience Overall satisfaction rating of the service provided by Tayside Police
2011-12 Result
First Contact Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact
2011-12 Target
Customer Satisfaction
SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin
91.5%
91.8% 92.1%
-0.3
94.3% 89.1%
5.2
89.7% 89.6%
0.1
89.7% 94.3%
-4.6
94.9% 100.0%
-5.1
80.0%
84.3% 79.6%
4.7
91.4% 77.2%
14.2
92.3% 77.8%
14.5
75.6% 83.1%
-7.5
80.0% 77.8%
2.2
65.0%
59.7% 57.5%
2.2
60.9% 53.5%
7.4
46.2% 58.5%
-12.3
69.1% 58.8%
10.3
63.2% 65.2%
-2.0
85.0%
83.0% 82.5%
0.5
80.0% 80.9%
-0.9
81.0% 79.7%
1.3
88.5% 83.0%
5.5
81.4% 93.1%
-11.7
226/756 (29.9%)
54/188 (28.7%)
65/193 (33.7%)
63/266 (23.7%)
Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the small sub-sample sizes. First Contact - Reduction in satisfaction with service at first contact from 92.1% to 91.8% - Improvement in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 79.6% to 84.3%. This result well exceeds the force target set at 80.0% Updating the Public - Improvement in updating the public from 57.5% to 59.7% Customer Experience - Improvement in overall customer experience from 82.5% to 83.0%
44/109 (40.4%)
Policing Angus: Standards of Service ~ April - December 2011
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL - DECEMBER 2011
DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION - APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin
SECTION 3 Arbroath
SECTION 4 Carnoustie
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
% / pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year
70.9%
76.2%
-5.3
74.2%
69.0%
5.2
73.2%
80.0%
-6.8
59.5%
67.2%
-7.7
76.5%
94.6%
-18.1
Feelings of safety after dark % of residents who felt safe walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark
65.1%
65.6%
-0.5
57.7%
72.1%
-14.4
64.8%
51.9%
12.9
55.8%
59.5%
-3.7
77.1%
80.0%
-2.9
Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood
34.0%
34.0%
0.0
29.8%
25.0%
4.8
19.2%
34.6%
-15.4
55.6%
48.7%
6.9
31.5%
21.8%
9.7
Public Perception
21
Issues that cause most concern in neighbourhoods *Other includes: Litter, Dog Fouling, Fly tipping etc
Response Rate
Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Other* Vandalism/graffiti Housebreaking Alcohol related crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime 239/756 (31.6%)
Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Vandalism/graffiti Housebreaking Other Alcohol related crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime
Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Other Drug dealing/drug abuse Alcohol related crime Housebreaking Vandalism/graffiti Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime
Drug dealing/drug abuse Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Housebreaking Other Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime
Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Other Housebreaking Drug dealing/drug abuse Alcohol related crime Vandalism/graffiti Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime
53/181 (29.3%)
54/179 (30.2%)
56/204 (27.5%)
76/192 (39.6%)
Policing Angus: Public Perception ~ April - December 2011
SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir
POLICING ANGUS
Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 SECTION 1: FORFAR AND KIRRIEMUIR
SECTION 2: MONTROSE AND BRECHIN
Main areas of public concern: dangerous/ careless driving and antisocial behaviour
Main areas of public concern: dangerous/ careless driving and antisocial behaviour
Crime Overall reduction of 17% in Groups 1-4 crime (142 crimes) • Reduction in crimes of dishonesty of 23.3% (126 crimes
Crime Biggest reduction in Division in Groups 1-4 crime (29.5%, 226 crimes) • Biggest reduction in Division in crimes of dishonesty of 23.7% (93 crimes • Biggest reduction in Division in vandalism of 37.9% (119crimes)
•
•
Standards of Service Improvement in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry, from 53.5% recorded last year to 60.9%
• •
•
Detection rate 100% detection rate for violent crime Dip in detection rate for vandalism from 51.9% to 29.2%
Public Perception* Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 69% recorded last year to 74.2% • Drop in the proportion of people feeling safe after dark, from 72.1% to 57.7%
Standards of Service Substantial decrease in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 58.5% recorded last year to 46.2%, the lowest result recorded across the Division Public Perception* • Improvement in people feeling safe after dark, from 51.9% to 64.8% • Continued reduction in the proportion of people who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime, from 34.6% to 19.2%, the best result across the Division
•
•
Targeted Community Activity Inspector Ally Robertson said: “ Overall crime, particularly crimes of dishonesty, continue to steadily drop month by month which is encouraging. There has been a slight increase in break–ins to commercial premises but we have managed to detect most of them.
Targeted Community Activitiy Inspector Mark McInally said:
With respect to standards of service, we continue to make improvements in most areas of our public contact and service provision. It is however still work in progress to achieve the ambitious targets we have set ourselves.
“A very encouraging reduction in all areas of crime which is down to the high profile activity and policing style undertaken by the Section Officers. This style and activity will be maintained particularly during this current period of relatively high staffing levels. The dip in detection rate for vandalism is to be highlighted to all staff and efforts will be made to address this.
Public perception remains largely unchanged although of those surveyed there was an increase in those who thought that crime in their neighbourhood had gone up, the reality being that it has gone down. We need to be more proactive at communicating this positive message.”
Staff will be reminded of the requirement to update all people reporting incidents and not just those who report crimes. The continued good results in relation to public perception are again due to the high profile policing style undertaken during this period and this will con-
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
22
Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 tinue. However, the challenge will be to maintain these good results.”
seen a drop of 9.1% (88 fewer crimes) in the numbers of the main recorded crime groups, coupled with a detection rate of 50.9%. This means that general crime is reducing and our ability to detect those responsible for crimes that do occur, remains at a positive level.
SECTION 3: ARBROATH Main areas of public concern: drug dealing/drug abuse and antisocial behaviour
There has been an increase in violent crime this year to date (14 more crimes than last year) which is of concern. Officers are determined to do all they can to reduce this, including dealing robustly with people intent on using violence, and conducting increased proactive patrols around pubs and clubs to deter such incidents.
Crime • Overall reduction of 9.1% in Groups 1-4 crime (88 crimes) • Increase in violent crime, from 25 recorded last year to 39 for the current year to date • Reduction in crimes of dishonesty of 16.5% (98 crimes)
It is pleasing to note there has been a significant improvement in the proportion of people who have been appropriately updated regarding the progress of our enquiries, and the overall satisfaction levels remain high at 88.5% (in relation to standards of service). However, we continue to strive for improvement in our service levels and hope to improve further on these figures in the months ahead.
Detection rate • Best detection rate across the Division for Groups
1-4 at 50.9% • Best detection rate across the Division for crimes
of dishonesty at 57.1% • Best detection rate across the Division for housebreaking at 47.1%
Regarding public perception, it is apparent that although many crime levels are dropping, and our efforts to detect criminals remains generally high, members of the local community are concerned about becoming a victim of crime, or feel unsafe after dark. I intend to address this matter by ensuring that officers remain visible on patrol, in the areas where they are most required. It is also important that we communicate our successes and ensure that local people are informed of the improvements that are being made to tackle crime locally. This will be achieved through a sustained media campaign.”
Standards of Service • Best result across the Division. Showing a further
improvement in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry, increasing from 56.8% recorded last month to 69.1%, and also representing an improvement over last year of 10.3 percentage points. • Best result across the Division. Improvement in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, rising from 83% recorded last year to 88.5%. Both results exceeding target. Public Perception* Drop in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had decreased or remained the same, from 67.2% recorded last year to 59.5% • Increased concern about becoming a victim of crime, rising from 48.7% recorded last year to 55.6%, with drug dealing and antisocial behaviour being the main concerns.
SECTION 4: CARNOUSTIE
•
Main areas of public concern: dangerous/ careless driving and antisocial behaviour Crime Only Section to show increase in Groups 1-4 crimes (7.7% - an improvement on the 9.6% recorded last month, 19 crimes) • Crimes of indecency decreased from 19 recorded last year to 9 for this year • Increase in vandalism of 32.7% (35 crimes) •
Targeted Community Activity Inspector Adrian Robertson said: “General crime levels in Arbroath section continue to drop significantly, and our detection rates remain high. To put this into some perspective we have
Detection rate • Fall in detection rate for Groups 1-4, from 44.5%
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
23
Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 •
to 34.8% Best detection rate across Division for vandalism at 33.8%, an improvement of 5.8 percentage points
Standards of Service Decrease in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 93.1% to 81.4%
•
Public Perception* • Best result across Division for people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had decreased or remained the same at 76.5%, however a substantial drop for the 94.6% recorded last year • Best result across Division for proportion of people feeling safe after dark, 77.1% • Concern about becoming a victim of crime has increased slightly from 21.8% to 31.5% Targeted Community Activity Inspector Fiona Jarrett said: “Crime in Carnoustie and Monifieth accounts for about 12% of all crime in Angus. Over the same period last year i.e. April to December, it has shown an increase of about 7% i.e. by 21 crimes from 272 to 293 crimes. This has largely been due to an increase in vandalism from an average of about 4 to 5 a week. This presents us with a challenge which we are seeking to address. Our initial efforts to improve our detection rates in relation to vandalism is paying dividends. Of the 44 people who responded to surveys last month there were slightly more of the opinion that we had not been performing to our usual high standard. This will be reviewed next month to see if any trend becomes apparent. The public perception that Carnoustie and Monifieth are safe places remains high in comparison with most of Angus. However it has taken a slight dip compared to the same period last year and this is disappointing. We will seek to improve our visible presence on the streets and make better use of the media to improve on this.”
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
24
POLICING ANGUS: Crime in more detail PERIOD APRIL to DECEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2010/2011 Made known
2011/2012
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others
0 4 0 47 5 15 1 1 1 0
0 4 0 42 4 12 1 1 0 0
100.0% 89.4% 80.0% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -
3 6 0 38 10 15 0 3 4 0
2 6 0 31 6 15 0 3 2 0
66.7% 100.0% 81.6% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -
3 2 0 -9 5 0 -1 2 3 0
50.0% -19.1% 100.0% 0.0% -100.0% 200.0% 300.0% -
74
64
86.5%
79
65
82.3%
5
6.8%
11 1 45 16 5 9
2 2 38 27 4 5
18.2% 200.0% 84.4% 168.8% 80.0% 55.6%
16 0 55 6 8 1
11 0 40 5 4 1
68.8% 72.7% 83.3% 50.0% 100.0%
5 -1 10 -10 3 -8
45.5% -100.0% 22.2% -62.5% 60.0% -88.9%
87
78
89.7%
86
61
70.9%
-1
-1.1%
82 62 80 51 25 56 0 35 1081 60 6 10 95 10
42 25 22 16 7 33 0 21 600 20 6 8 75 12
51.2% 40.3% 27.5% 31.4% 28.0% 58.9% 60.0% 55.5% 33.3% 100.0% 80.0% 78.9% 120.0%
74 36 56 27 28 41 0 26 922 50 3 3 72 3
29 6 15 9 3 27 0 22 501 14 3 3 33 2
39.2% 16.7% 26.8% 33.3% 10.7% 65.9% 84.6% 54.3% 28.0% 100.0% 100.0% 45.8% 66.7%
-8 -26 -24 -24 3 -15 0 -9 -159 -10 -3 -7 -23 -7
-9.8% -41.9% -30.0% -47.1% 12.0% -26.8% -25.7% -14.7% -16.7% -50.0% -70.0% -24.2% -70.0%
1653
887
53.7%
1341
667
49.7%
-312
-18.9%
34 962 35
14 374 29
41.2% 38.9% 82.9%
18 867 22
8 266 20
44.4% 30.7% 90.9%
-16 -95 -13
-47.1% -9.9% -37.1%
GROUP 4 - TOTAL
1031
417
40.4%
907
294
32.4%
-124
-12.0%
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
2845
1446
50.8%
2413
1087
45.0%
-432
-15.2%
30 5 63 16 0 149 56 84 285 3 16
29 5 63 15 0 148 54 85 286 3 16
96.7% 100.0% 100.0% 93.8% 99.3% 96.4% 101.2% 100.4% 100.0% 100.0%
13 2 66 8 1 131 41 28 220 8 13
14 2 66 8 1 130 40 29 223 7 11
107.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 97.6% 103.6% 101.4% 87.5% 84.6%
-17 -3 3 -8 1 -18 -15 -56 -65 5 -3
-56.7% -60.0% 4.8% -50.0% -12.1% -26.8% -66.7% -22.8% 166.7% -18.8%
707
704
99.6%
531
531
100.0%
-176
-24.9%
3552
2150
60.5%
2944
1618
55.0%
-608
-17.1%
GROUP 1 - TOTAL
GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others
GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
25
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
SECTION 3
SECTION 5
SECTION 6
Perth City
East Perthshire
South Perthshire
SECTION 7 North and West Perthshire
2010-11 Result
% / pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
3079
3285
-6.3%
1719
1803
-4.7%
553
532
3.9%
627
664
-5.6%
180
286
-37.1%
- Detection rate
50.2%
47.0%
3.2
55.6%
53.0%
2.6
44.8%
46.2%
-1.4
44.0%
35.7%
8.3
36.1%
32.5%
3.6
112
120
-6.7%
76
74
2.7%
16
25
-36.0%
14
20
-30.0%
6
1
500.0%
- Detection rate
92.9%
99.2%
-6.3
96.1%
95.9%
0.2
87.5%
108.0%
-20.5
78.6%
100.0%
-21.4
Indecency (G2)
72
66
9.1%
29
29
0.0%
24
22
9.1%
17
9
88.9%
2
6
-66.7%
- Detection rate
68.1%
65.2%
2.9
69.0%
77.8%
-8.8
70.8%
59.1%
11.7
64.7%
77.8%
-13.1
50.0%
33.3%
16.7
Dishonesty (G3)
2074
2174
-4.6%
1162
1222
-4.9%
339
318
6.6%
446
448
-0.4%
127
186
-31.7%
- Detection rate
53.2%
48.3%
4.9
60.6%
57.5%
3.1
43.4%
45.9%
-2.5
47.3%
29.7%
17.6
32.3%
36.0%
-3.7
821
925
-11.2%
452
478
-5.4%
174
167
4.2%
150
187
-19.8%
45
93
-51.6%
35.2%
35.9%
-0.7
35.2%
33.5%
1.7
40.2%
43.1%
-2.9
28.7%
41.2%
-12.5
37.8%
24.7%
13.1
26
29
-10.3%
24
23
4.3%
0
1
***
2
4
-50.0%
0
1
***
88.5%
93.1%
-4.6
91.7%
91.3%
0.4
0.0%
100.0%
-100
50.0%
100.0%
-50
0.0%
100.0%
***
748
870
-14.0%
416
448
-7.1%
162
156
3.8%
129
176
-26.7%
41
90
-54.4%
34.5%
34.0%
0.5
33.9%
30.8%
3.1
39.5%
41.0%
-1.5
28.7%
40.9%
-12.2
36.6%
26.7%
9.9
123
116
6.0%
72
75
-4.0%
20
18
11.1%
26
17
52.9%
5
6
-16.7%
39.0%
40.5%
-1.5
38.9%
46.7%
-7.8
45.0%
33.3%
12
38.5%
35.3%
3.2
20.0%
0.0%
20
Violent Crime (G1)
100.0% 100.0%
0
26 Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4) - Detection rate Robbery - Detection rate Vandalism - Detection rate Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate
Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
2011-12 Result
Groups 1-4
CRIME
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
SECTION 5 East Perthshire
SECTION 6 South Perthshire
SECTION 7 North & West Perthshire
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2010-11 Result
2011-12 Result
Response Rate
% / pp Change
27
First Contact % of respondents provided with 80.0% the name of the person dealing with their enquiry Updating the Public % of customers who received 65.0% an update on the progress of their enquiry Customer Experience Overall satisfaction rating of the 85.0% service provided by Tayside Police
2010-11 Result
91.5%
2011-12 Result
First Contact Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact
2011-12 Target
Customer Satisfaction
SECTION 3 Perth City
97.4% 91.2%
6.2
97.4% 88.1%
9.3
98.5% 96.5%
2.0
95.4% 89.7%
5.7
100.0% 96.3%
3.7
88.9% 83.4%
5.5
90.1% 77.3%
12.8
90.2% 87.7%
2.5
89.1% 83.9%
5.2
80.0% 100.0%
-20.0
64.8% 63.0%
1.8
61.4% 60.9%
0.5
69.5% 71.4%
-1.9
64.3% 61.9%
2.4
73.9%
54.5%
19.4
85.2% 80.6%
4.6
85.9% 77.1%
8.8
86.4% 82.8%
3.6
83.8% 83.7%
0.1
83.4%
84.6%
-1.2
363/972 (37.3%)
162/484 (33.5%)
69/206 (33.5%)
101/214 (47.2%)
31/68 (45.6%)
Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the small sub-sample sizes. First Contact - Improvement in satisfaction with service at first contact from 91.2% to 97.4%, the highest result across the force. This result well exceeds the force target set at 91.5% - Improvement in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 83.4% to 88.9%, the highest result across the force. This result again well exceeds the force target set at 80.0% Updating the Public - Improvement in updating the public from 63.0% to 64.8%, the highest result across the force. Customer Experience - Improvement in overall customer experience from 80.6% to 85.2%, the highest result across the force. This result exceeds the force target set at 85.0%
Policing Perth & Kinross: Standards of Service ~ April - December 2011
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL - DECEMBER 2011
DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION - APRIL - DECEMBER 2011 SECTION 5 East Perthshire
SECTION 6 South Perthshire
SECTION 7 North & West Perthshire
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
% / pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2010-11 Result
%/pp Change
Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year
71.9%
75.2%
-3.3
70.1%
63.9%
6.2
76.7%
79.5%
-2.8
68.2%
79.6%
-11.4
76.9%
78.9%
-2.0
Feelings of safety after dark % of residents who felt safe walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark
71.4%
68.6%
2.8
59.4%
49.4%
10.0
72.4%
73.1%
-0.7
79.1%
76.0%
3.1
78.2%
79.2%
-1.0
Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood
27.9%
27.6%
0.3
29.1%
40.0%
-10.9
31.8%
22.7%
9.1
28.6%
25.3%
3.3
11.8%
12.0%
-0.2
Public Perception
28
Issues that cause most concern in neighbourhoods *Other includes: Litter, Dog Fouling, Fly tipping etc
Response Rate
Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Housebreaking Other* Alcohol related crime Vandalism/graffiti Drug dealing/drug abuse Motor vehicle crime Assault Cause no concern: Robbery 338/972 (34.8%)
Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Other Housebreaking Alcohol related crime Dangerous/careless driving Vandalism/graffiti Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery
Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Housebreaking Alcohol related crime Vandalism/graffiti Other Drug dealing/drug abuse Assault Cause no concern: Robbery Motor vehicle crime
Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Housebreaking Other Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Drug dealing/drug abuse Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery
Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Other Vandalism/graffiti Housebreaking Alcohol related crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Drug dealing/drug abuse Motor vehicle crime
97/297 (32.7%)
90/255 (35.3%)
117/312 (37.5%)
34/108 (31.5%)
Policing Perth & Kinross: Public Perception ~ April - December 2011
SECTION 3 Perth City
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
Policing Perth & Kinross: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 members of the public following a number of high profile incidents has assisted in giving an improvement in the percentage of people feeling safe after dark of 10 percentage points and an almost 11 percentage point reduction in those concerned about becoming a victim of crime.
SECTION 3: PERTH CITY Main areas of public concern: antisocial behaviour and drug dealing/drug abuse Crime • Slight reduction in Groups 1-4 crime (4.7%, 84 crimes) • Reduction of 7.1% in vandalism (32 crimes)
The success of these activities will continue and be developed to include new issues should they develop.”
Detection rate Best detection rate across the Division for Groups 1-4 at 55.6% • Best detection rate across the division for crimes of dishonesty at 60.6% •
SECTION 5: EAST PERTHSHIRE Main areas of public concern: dangerous/ careless driving and antisocial behaviour
Standards of Service Substantial improvement in overall customer satisfaction from 77.1% to 85.9%
Crime Same level of crime recorded as last year for groups 1-4 crime • No robberies recorded since the beginning of the year
•
•
Public Perception* • Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had decreased or remained the same, from 63.9% recorded last year to 70.1% • A 10 percentage point improvement in people feeling safe after dark, from 49.4% to 59.4% • Marked reduction in people concerned about becoming a victim of crime, from 40.0% to 29.1%
Detection rate Continues to hold the best detection rate across the Division for vandalism at 39.5% • Best detection rate across the Division for domestic housebreaking at 45% •
Standards of Service Above divisional target with respect to updating the public on the progress of their enquiry, 69.5% against a target of 65% • Best result across the Division for overall customer satisfaction rating with service provided 86.4% against a target of 85% •
Targeted Community Activity Inspector Ian Martin said: “A 4.7% decrease in crimes in the Groups 1-4 category coupled with an increase of 2.6 percentage points in the detection rate to 55.6%, highlights the dedication of officers and staff working towards a safer city in Perth. Perth City staff worked very hard to achieve the best detection rates in two crime categories.
Public Perception* Increase in the proportion of people who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime, from 22.7% to 31.8%
•
A pro-active approach to anti-social behaviour with special patrols targeting underage drinkers has clearly had an impact on those who may have been involved in anti-social behaviour. This approach has resulted in a drop of 7.1% in the number of reported vandalisms and an increase in the detection rate by 3.1 percentage points.
Targeted Community Activity Inspector Wayne Morrison said: “In East Perthshire, which covers Blairgowrie and Glenshee, Coupar Angus, Alyth and the Carse of Gowrie, crimes in Groups 1-4 have remained more or less static, notably there were no robberies reported over the preceding months and an overall reduction of 36% in violent crime.
Citizens of Perth city have noted their overall satisfaction as being 85.9% an improvement of 8.8 percentage points. The holding of ‘Street briefings’ and use of Social media to assuage the potential fears of
In terms of anti-social behaviour and crime, the
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
29
Policing Perth & Kinross: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 ‘hands-on’ pro-active approach has ensured the section retained the division’s best detection rate for vandalism. Other activity such as youth alcohol patrols and close partnership working with Community Wardens ensures the situation continues to improve.
ment by supervisors which has directly resulted in improved detection rates throughout the section. Intervention by sergeants to ensure that victims of crime receive regular updates has resulted in the section maintaining and improving upon our standards of service. Briefings highlight our aim to get it right first time.
Being the best in division in relation to overall customer satisfaction at 86.4% is an excellent achievement. Officers continue to carry out high visibility foot patrols on their beats whenever possible ensuring this trend continues.”
The media are widely used in South Section to highlight our partnership working and 'good news' events. Street briefings in our communities along with social media have helped get our key messages across. We will continue take a pro-active approach to crime in the section and maintain the success of the past months.”
SECTION 6: SOUTH PERTHSHIRE Main areas of public concern: antisocial behaviour and dangerous/careless driving
SECTION 7: PERTHSHIRE
Crime • Reduction of 5.6% in Groups 1-4 crime (37 crimes) • Reduction of 26.7% in vandalism (47 crimes)
NORTH
AND
WEST
Main areas of public concern: antisocial behaviour and dangerous/careless driving
Detection rate Crimes of dishonesty detection rate of 47.3%, a 17.6 percentage point improvement over the previous year
Crime Best result across Division for crime reduction 37.1% in Groups 1-4 crime (106 crimes), • Best result across the Division for reduction in crimes of dishonesty - 34.5% (61 crimes), • No robberies recorded since the beginning of the year • Best result across the Division for reduction in vandalism - 54.4% (49 crimes)
•
•
Standards of Service • Just under target for people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry - 64.3% recorded against a target of 65% Public Perception* Drop in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had decreased or remained the same, from 79.6% recorded last year to 68.2% • Best result across the Division with respect to people feeling safe after dark, 79.1%
Detection rate • Detection rate of 36.6% for vandalism, an improvement of 9.9 percentage points over last year
•
Standards of Service • Best result across the Division for providing the
public with an update on the progress of their enquiry - 73.9%, a 19.4% improvement over last year and exceeding the target of 65%
Targeted Community Activity Inspector Iain Ward said: “The entire section has played an active part in recent focussed activity such as After Dark and Homesafe. Diversion activities such as 'Street Sports for All' have been widely utilised to great effect resulting in less anti social behaviour and associated vandalisms.
Public Perception* Best result across the Division for people who thought that crime rates had remained the same or improved in their neighbourhood - 76.7% • Best result across the Division with respect to the proportion of people who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime, 11.8%, a further improvement on the 13.8% recorded last month. •
There has been a real focus on local crime manage-
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
30
Policing Perth & Kinross: Community Summaries ~ April - December 2011 Targeted Community Activity Inspector Maggie Pettigrew said: “Our officers and staff in the North and West Perthshire area continue to work hard for the community achieving the best results across the division for crime reduction in three areas including dishonesty and vandalism. Combining this with an improvement in the detection rate for vandalism of 9.9% shows the impact a community based policing strategy can have on an area in reducing antisocial behaviour and its consequences. Our officers’ and staff’s service to the public is confirmed in the survey results which are again the best in division showing 76.7% of those asked thought crimes rates had improved or remained the same. The proportion of those people in the section surveyed who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime had also reduced again from the previous month. North and West Perthshire officers will continue to pro-actively patrol the section and support the Community Policing model to get it right first time and every time.”
CRIME MANAGEMENT Inspector Dave Adamson said: “The excellent results published here are testament to the hard work carried out by all staff involved in policing Perth and Kinross. These can only be achieved by staff working closely with victims of crime, specialist departments, outside agencies and partners to carry out thorough investigations of crime. Regular review of crimes allows for analysis which is then used to direct investigation in the appropriate direction and pro-actively direct officers to patrol in areas where crime or anti-social behaviour has become an issue. In pro-actively targeting issues antisocial behaviour and crime can be reduced improving the feeling of safety for everyone. Perth and Kinross police officers and staff continue to use this tried and tested model in the community to great effect.” (* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
31
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS: Crime in more detail PERIOD APRIL to DECEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2010/2011 Made known
2011/2012
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others GROUP 1 - TOTAL
0 13 0 53 29 10 1 7 6 1
0 13 0 54 27 11 1 6 6 1
100.0% 101.9% 93.1% 110.0% 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% 100.0%
4 24 0 34 26 19 0 1 4 0
4 23 0 30 23 19 0 1 4 0
100.0% 95.8% 88.2% 88.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -
4 11 84.6% 0 -19 -35.8% -3 -10.3% 9 90.0% -1 -100.0% -6 -85.7% -2 -33.3% -1 -100.0%
120
119
99.2%
112
104
92.9%
-8
-6.7%
8 3 30 14 3 8
5 0 24 8 1 5
62.5% 0.0% 80.0% 57.1% 33.3% 62.5%
11 2 38 4 13 4
9 1 29 1 5 4
81.8% 50.0% 76.3% 25.0% 38.5% 100.0%
3 -1 8 -10 10 -4
37.5% -33.3% 26.7% -71.4% 333.3% -50.0%
66
43
65.2%
72
49
68.1%
6
9.1%
116 49 164 60 118 96 1 68 1271 74 4 8 123 22
47 8 67 21 27 61 1 56 648 15 4 9 69 16
40.5% 16.3% 40.9% 35.0% 22.9% 63.5% 100.0% 82.4% 51.0% 20.3% 100.0% 112.5% 56.1% 72.7%
123 50 85 52 95 68 2 64 1255 86 15 6 148 24
48 7 49 16 39 38 2 48 683 47 15 6 98 7
39.0% 14.0% 57.6% 30.8% 41.1% 55.9% 100.0% 75.0% 54.4% 54.7% 100.0% 100.0% 66.2% 29.2%
7 1 -79 -8 -23 -28 1 -4 -16 12 11 -2 25 2
6.0% 2.0% -48.2% -13.3% -19.5% -29.2% 100.0% -5.9% -1.3% 16.2% 275.0% -25.0% 20.3% 9.1%
2174
1049
48.3%
2073
1103
53.2%
-101
-4.6%
26 870 31
12 296 25
46.2% 34.0% 80.6%
46 748 27
12 258 19
26.1% 34.5% 70.4%
20 -122 -4
76.9% -14.0% -12.9%
927
333
35.9%
821
289
35.2%
-106
-11.4%
3287
1544
47.0%
3078
1545
50.2%
-209
-6.4%
43 2 97 10 0 169 70 107 497 8 10
44 2 96 11 0 168 66 105 503 9 10
102.3% 100.0% 99.0% 110.0% 99.4% 94.3% 98.1% 101.2% 112.5% 100.0%
16 4 62 26 0 146 61 53 707 14 16
15 4 63 25 0 146 59 52 706 15 13
93.8% 100.0% 101.6% 96.2% 100.0% 96.7% 98.1% 99.9% 107.1% 81.3%
-27 2 -35 16 0 -23 -9 -54 210 6 6
-62.8% 100.0% -36.1% 160.0% -13.6% -12.9% -50.5% 42.3% 75.0% 60.0%
GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to ravish Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL
1013
1014 100.1%
1105
1098
99.4%
92
9.1%
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
4300
2558
4183
2643
63.2%
-117
-2.7%
59.5%
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
32
DELIVERING LOCAL POLICING
B
uilding public confidence and trust is how Tayside Police aims to improve satisfaction with the quality of service provided to its communities. This is achieved through the effective delivery of policing services which meet the needs of local communities. It is about ease of access to services, giving the public a voice in order to influence how the force responds to issues that matter to them, delivering appropriate and robust interventions, working with partners, providing feedback to the public and keeping them informed of progress and improvement. The force uses performance indicators to gather information about performance, quality of service and public perception. These are illustrated below. Those marked with a tick also contribute to the following: The Scottish Policing Performance Framework ‘Scotland Performs’ - the National Government Framework (Single Outcome Agreements) The Force Control Strategy
INDICATORS 1.
PUBLIC PROTECTION
2.
SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME
3.
COUNTER TERRORISM
4.
FIREARMS
5.
ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
6.
CRIME
7.
ROAD POLICING/SAFETY
8.
SERVICE RESPONSE
33
PUBLIC PROTECTION Tayside Police uses its crime recording system to manage information gathered by operational police officers in respect of all facets of the Public Protection portfolio, including Domestic Abuse, Child Protection and Vulnerable Adult Protection. Where substantive crimes are being investigated, reports will have relevant markers added to them which allows officers and staff from support functions and specialist teams to search and identify relevant records. Where no substantive crimes are being investigated, the system allows officers to file CONCERN reports which, as the title suggests, allows officers to record any anxiety they have regarding a situation they have either attended or witnessed during the course of their duties. These domestic, child and adult concern reports are, in due course, assessed by specialist departments and, where appropriate, information is shared with partner agencies under Information Sharing Protocols.
Domestic Abuse Tayside Police respond to many instances of a domestic nature throughout the course of a year. tic abuse incidents are recorded to ensure an appropriate response is initiated.
All domes-
By recording all incidents of domestic abuse, Tayside Police can, in the first instance, assess risk to those who are subjected to the abuse and the impact on any children involved. Secondly, they can put protective measures in place, and lastly, target repeat offenders. Domestic abuse is not a crime in itself and can be either one form of, or a combination of, non-criminal behaviour or criminal behaviour. Examples of non-criminal behaviour would be isolation, withholding money and psychological abuse etc which can have a substantial impact on a person’s health and well-being and that of their children. Examples of criminal behaviour would be assaults, vandalism, threatening or abusive behaviour, fire-raising etc. When domestic abuse is reported to the police we will work in partnership with specialist agencies including Barnardos, Women’s Aid and the Violence against Women partnerships to ensure that those at risk from abuse, and their families, are given appropriate support and advice which will enable them to make an informed decision about their future. In addition to working with our partners, when a crime has also been committed, Tayside Police will carry out a thorough investigation and, where there is a sufficiency of evidence, the perpetrator will be reported to the Procurator Fiscal. During the first four months of 2011/12 the number of Domestic Abuse incidents recorded each month was lower than the number recorded at the same time last year. However this pattern was reversed during August and following the summer months where the number of domestic abuse incidents recorded rose compared with the previous year. In December 2011 454 incidents were reported ~ the highest month to date this year.
2010-11
Tayside ~ Dom estic Abuse Incidents
2011-12
500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Apr
May
34
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
PUBLIC PROTECTION Between April and the end of December 2011, Tayside Tayside Police dealt with 3530 domestic Police abuse incidents and 1860 of these involved Force one or more substantiated crimes. In 57% of Apr incidents where a crime had occurred the perMay petrator was charged and a report was sent to Jun the Procurator Fiscal. Victims stated that Jul 38% of reported incidents resulting in a subAug stantive crime were repeat episodes. Sep
Throughout the Tayside area there were 88 Domestic Abuse Incidents per 10,000 population. In 23% of incidents either the victim, the perpetrator or both were under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident.
Domestic Incidents
Incidents per 10,000 population
% of repeat victims
% incidents involving alcohol
% reported to PF
322
8.00
31%
17%
49%
369
9.17
39%
20%
55%
335
8.32
41%
22%
60%
413
10.26
36%
24%
56%
436
10.83
35%
22%
56%
401
9.96
35%
23%
58%
Oct
418
10.38
43%
31%
59%
Nov
382
9.49
35%
25%
55%
Dec
454
11.28
41%
23%
63%
Jan
0
0.00
0%
0%
0%
Feb
0
0.00
0%
0%
0%
Mar
0
0.00
0%
0%
0%
Total
3530
87.68
38%
23%
57%
From April to December 2011 there were 411 crimes of violence recorded in Tayside of which 10% were recorded with a domestic marker.
Adult Concern Reports Throughout Tayside, between April and the end of December 2011 there were 2051 adult concern reports recorded. This equated to 51 per 10,000 population.
The table to the right shows the divisional distribution with 487 recorded in Dundee, 834 in Angus and 730 in Perth & Kinross. The highest number recorded per 10,000 population was in Angus at 75.
ADULT CONCERN REPORTS
Dundee Concern Reports
Angus
No. per 10,000 population
Concern Reports
Perth & Kinross
No. per 10,000 population
Concern Reports
No. per 10,000 population
Apr
42
2.91
62
5.61
52
3.52
May
44
3.05
89
8.05
71
4.80
Jun
40
2.77
84
7.59
67
4.53
Jul
55
3.81
101
9.13
69
4.67
Aug
66
4.57
99
8.95
94
6.36
Sep
58
4.02
106
9.58
83
5.62
Oct
70
4.85
90
8.14
97
6.56
Nov
57
3.95
109
9.86
83
5.62
Dec
55
3.81
94
8.50
114
7.71
487
34
834
75
730
49
Jan Feb Mar TOTAL
35
PUBLIC PROTECTION Crimes against Children Tayside Crim es against Children (per 10,000 population)
There were 783 crimes recorded throughout Tayside between April and the end of December where a child was recorded as the victim. However, this total does include crimes of theft where an item belonging to a child (most commonly a bicycle or a mobile phone) was stolen. The geographical distribution, per 10,000 population, is illustrated on the chart to the left with 23 such crimes in the Dundee area, 22 in Angus and 14 in Perth & Kinross.
Perth & Kinross
Angus
Dundee
0
5
10
15
20
25
Of great concern is the fact that in 12% of crimes against children (97) the offender was under the influence of alcohol, putting the child in question at risk. 30 such crimes were recorded in Dundee, 27 in Perth & Kinross whilst the total in Angus was 40. In 32 crimes across Tayside the child was also under the influence of alcohol. 11 crimes were recorded where the offender was under the influence of drugs and in 1 case the child had also been given drugs.
Child Concern Reports Throughout Tayside, between April and the end of December 2011 there were 6739 child concern reports recorded. This equated to 167 per 10,000 population. The table to the right shows the divisional distribution with 3416 recorded in Dundee, 1787 in Angus and 1536 in Perth & Kinross. The highest number recorded per 10,000 population was in Dundee at just over 237.
CHILD CONCERN REPORTS
Dundee Concern Reports
Angus
No. per 10,000 population
Concern Reports
Perth & Kinross
No. per 10,000 population
Concern Reports
No. per 10,000 population
Apr
361
25.02
172
15.55
139
9.40
May
395
27.37
210
18.99
181
12.25
Jun
383
26.54
202
18.26
182
12.31
Jul
395
27.37
190
17.18
162
10.96
Aug
414
28.69
218
19.71
156
10.55
Sep
409
28.34
242
21.88
176
11.91
Oct
359
24.88
189
17.09
194
13.13
Nov
344
23.84
177
16.00
187
12.65
Dec
356
24.67
187
16.91
159
10.76
3416
237
1787
162
1536
104
Jan Feb Mar TOTAL
Source of information: Tayside Police Crime Recording System
36
PUBLIC PROTECTION Registered Sex Offenders The list of Registered Sex Offenders is broken down into the number of those in the community and the number of those in custody. Registered Sex Offenders in the community are those who have either completed their prison sentence and have been released into the community or are serving their sentence within the community. These people required to be monitored as registered sex offenders. Registered Sex Offenders in custody are those Tayside who are currently serving their sentence for the Registered Sex Offenders crime they committed. The length of time people spend on the sex offenders register will depend on 400 the sentence they received. The number of sex offenders at risk of doing serious harm to another 350 16 individual (should they commit another crime) is also broken down into those at very high risk, high 300 risk, medium risk, low risk or not assessed. 250
The chart shows that there were 408 registered Sex Offenders in Tayside as at the end of December 2011. Of these, 342 were living in the community and were mainly assessed as medium (141) or low risk (143) of causing serious harm to another individual. There were however 39 people who were considered a high risk and a further 3 who were considered a very high risk, should they reoffend. A larger number of very high risk offenders were in custody (16). In addition, there were 15 high risk offenders, 15 medium risk and 5 low risk offenders also in custody.
V. High Risk
High risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk
Not Assessed
143
200 150 141
100
39 3
15 5 15 15 16
RSOs in the Community
RSOs in Custody
50 0
each of Sex Offender Order
Registered Sex Offence Liaison Officer (SOLO) Sexual Offence Liaison Officer (SOLO) is an officer who liaises with the victim of a serious sexual crime, provides them with appropriate information and support throughout the investigation.
Sexual Prevention Orders A Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) is an order that is made by the court and designed to protect the public from serious sexual harm. SOPOs are intended to protect the public from the risks posed by sex offenders by placing restrictions, or obligations on the sex offender’s behaviour. 32 Full SOPOs were in force as at the end of December and 1 Interim order.
Crimes of Indecency This crime group (referred to as Group 2) involves sexual offences. Some of these crimes have been committed prior to the current reporting period although all offences are recorded at the time they are reported. This can mean that some of the data reported each month could contain historical crimes. In addition, as evidence is discovered during investigations multiple crimes can be detected. As such, the level of crime recorded each month is variable. Between April 2011 and the end of December 2011, in Dundee, 174 crimes were recorded and a detection rate of 57.5% was achieved. In Angus 86 crimes were recorded together with a detection rate of 70.9% and 72 crimes were recorded in Perth and Kinross where the detection rate was 68.1%. The figures for the whole of Tayside were 332 crimes recorded and 63.3% detected.
Failure to notify police/provide false information It is a requirement of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 that a Sex Offender must provide to the police, and keep updated, various personal details including change of address and holiday arrangements, if these involve leaving the United Kingdom. Failure to do so results in the person being changed with the offence of ’Failure to notify the police or provide false information’. Between April and December 2011, 3 people were charged with this offence. 37
PUBLIC PROTECTION Drugs Supply of Class A Drugs Tayside
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Class A Drugs Recorded 90
Class A 2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD)
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
This is a volatile area on which to report. In some months there may appear to be very little activity and then there may be a large number of crimes reported at the one time. The nature of this area of business often involves many months of preparation, surveillance and cooperation with other forces, perhaps leading to a successful operation where several perpetrators are charged with numerous offences. The results are not a reflection on divisional performance as these arrests are often as a result of a headquarters drugs operation carried out in conjunction with the pertinent division and are recorded to reflect the geographical area in which the perpetrators were apprehended.
Tayside The chart to the left shows the number of crimes involved in the supplying of Class A drugs. This can be actual supply of drugs, possession with intent to supply drugs, importing or manufacturing of drugs, but does not include the charge of possession (for personal use) of drugs. There have been 113 crimes recorded to date throughout Tayside, 19% fewer than at the same time last year. Geographically, Angus and Perth and Kinross recorded lower levels in the first nine months of the year than last year but there was an increase of 16% in the Dundee area.
Tayside ~ Class A Drugs as a proportion of all Drugs Offences
Class A 2011-12 43% All Other Classes 2011-12 57%
As can be seen from the pie chart above right, just under half of all supplying etc of drugs crimes involve Class A drugs. 2% of crime across Tayside is drug related, meaning that either the victim or the offender was on drugs at the time of the offence. During December this resulted in 1035 crimes being drug related. The percentage was higher in Dundee with 4% (512 crimes) being drug Tayside 2011-12 2010-11 related, followed by 1% in Angus (258 crimes) and Drug Related Deaths under 1% in Perth & Kinross (265 crimes). 7 6
Drugs Deaths There have been 36 drug related deaths in Tayside from April to December 2011, an increase of 12.5% from the 32 recorded at the same time last year. The number of deaths peaked in both December and October 2011 when 6 deaths were recorded during those months.
5 4 3 2 1 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
38
Source of information: Tayside Police Management Information System
PUBLIC PROTECTION Serious Violent Crime Tayside Serious Violent Crime
2011-12
2010-11
Tayside Percentage of Serious Violent Crim es involving alcohol
3 Year Average
60 50 40
Alcohol Involved 52%
30
No Alcohol 48%
20 10 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
‘Serious Violent Crime’ is a sub-set of Violent Crime (Group 1), featuring the more serious offences of Murder, Attempted Murder, Serious Assault, Robbery and assault with intent to rob. During 2011/12 there were 320 such crimes recorded in Tayside, which is 5.3% lower than the 338 recorded last year. Following the recent drop in serious violent crime from September to November 2011 there was an increase in December with 37 crimes recorded during the month. However, this remains one crime lower than the 3 year average for this time of year. Just over half of all the serious violent crimes recorded this year involved alcohol.
Racist and Other Hate Crime
‘Racist Crime’ includes: any crime which has a racist element ‘Hate Crime’ includes: any crime which has occurred due to the victim being targeted because of their disability, or through a transphobic/transgender or a sectarian/religious nature.
Tayside Racist & Other Hate Crimes 50
Racist Crime 2011/12
Other Hate Crime 2011/12
Racist Crime 2010/11
Other Hate Crime 2010/11
45 40 35 30 25
As can be seen from the graph, there has been a general decline in both racist and hate crime during 2011. There were 20 racist crimes recorded in December 2011, and 5 other hate crimes.
20 15 10 5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Source of information: Tayside Police Management Information System
39
COUNTER TERRORISM UK Threat Levels The Home Office is responsible for announcing the UK threat level at any time and in advising the public when that level changes. There are five levels of threat: ♦
Critical ~ an attack is expected imminently
♦
Severe ~ an attack is likely
♦
Substantial ~ an attack is a strong possibility
♦
Moderate ~ an attack is possible but not likely
♦
Low ~ an attack is unlikely
On 11 July 2011 the Home Secretary announced that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had changed the threat level from international terrorism from severe to substantial. That means there is a strong possibility of a terrorist attack. The current level remains at SUBSTANTIAL.
Tayside In Tayside Police, Special Branch constantly review threat assessments. In addition, Counter Terrorist Security Advisors continue to raise the level of awareness about terrorist related matters within the Force and partner agencies. Between April and the end of December 2011, 64 Counter Terrorism briefings were delivered across Tayside to a total of 619 non-police personnel.
Source of information: The Home Office web-site Tayside Police Special Branch
40
41
GROUPS 1-4 RECORDED CRIME Policing Tayside Tayside
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Groups 1-4 2400
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Groups 1 to 4 includes: - Group 1 ~ Crimes of Violence - Group 2 ~ Crimes of Indecency - Group 3 ~ Crimes of Dishonesty - Group 4 ~ Crimes of Vandalism, Fire-raising etc.
The chart to the left illustrates that the level of crime each month this year has been much lower than the previous year. In recent months crime has fallen month-onmonth and at the end of December the total of 11297 was 18% less that the 13845 crimes recorded at the end of December 2010. Historically, the level of crime has escalated in the last 3 months of the year. The projected rise, however, is not as acute as the actual results in previous years.
Note: All projections are based on the previous 60 months’ worth of data and take seasonal variations into consideration. These are calculated every three months and illustrated on the graphs by a red-ringed yellow circle. The table below, and the ones on the following crime category pages, show the monthly totals of crime for the year 2010-2011 and for the months which have elapsed in 2011-12. The total column compares the cumulative result at the end of the most recent month in 2011-12 with the commensurate result last year and the last column displays the percentage difference. The colour coding indicates where a cumulative result has achieved target (green) or not achieved target (red).
Table of crime by month
Groups 1-4 Crime Tayside Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total % Diff 2011-12 1249 1299 1198 1356 1409 1360 1282 1109 1035 11297 -18% 2010-11 1478 1505 1674 1629 1816 1524 1585 1508 1126 1416 1345 1469 13845 Dundee 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 696 822
May 699 818
Jun 563 962
Jul 666 868
Aug Sep 746 677 1042 811
Oct 669 930
Nov 578 808
Dec 512 652
Jan
Feb
Mar
818
691
777
Angus 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 231 315
May 277 337
Jun 278 368
Jul 301 324
Aug 311 345
Sep 271 313
Oct 259 326
Nov 227 298
Dec 258 219
Jan
Feb
Mar
276
298
283
Perth & 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 322 341
May 323 350
Jun 357 344
Jul 389 437
Aug 352 429
Sep 412 400
Oct 354 329
Nov 304 402
Dec 265 255
Jan
Feb
Mar
322
356
409
Total % Diff 5806 -25% 7713 Total % Diff 2413 -15% 2845 Total % Diff 3078 -6% 3287
Detection Rate The detection rate remained stable at 47.4% against the target of 46.5%; this was almost 2 percentage points higher than the 45.5% recorded at the end of December 2010. Source: Tayside Police Management Information System
42
GROUPS 1-4 RECORDED CRIME Dundee
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Groups 1-4 1100
Policing Dundee Crime: The level of crime recorded each month during the current year has been much lower than during 2010-2011, as illustrated on the graph to the left and the 25% reduction at the end of November was sustained to the end of December. Historically crime levels have risen between January and March although the forecast figures do not indicate a significant increase.
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
1000 900 800 700 600
Detection Rate: The detection rate remained
500 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Angus
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Groups 1-4 700
Feb
stable at 46.9% against a target of 45.5% and represented a 4 percentage point improvement on the 42.9% recorded at the end of December 2010.
Mar
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
Policing Angus
Crime: In contrast to historical results, the level of crime in December increased as illustrated on the graph to the left. The 258 crimes recorded was close to the three year average.
600 500 400
Detection Rate: At the same time as the increase in crime recorded in December, the detection rate fell slightly to 45.0% against the target of 49%. The commensurate rate last year was 50.8%.
300 200 100 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Policing Perth & Kinross
Perth & Kinross
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Groups 1-4 700
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
Crime: The upward trend which had developed by the end of September was completely reversed by the end of December. The graph illustrates the falling results in recent months which resulted in an overall 6% decrease in the number of crimes recorded (3078) at the end of December 2011 compared to the end of December 2010 (3287).
600 500 400 300
Detection Rate: The detection rate remained
200
buoyant at 50.2% against the target of 48%. Last year the detection rate was 46.9%.
100 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Source of information: Tayside Police Management Information System
43
VIOLENT CRIME Policing Tayside Tayside Violent Crime
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
100
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
90 80
Violent Crime includes crimes such as Murder, Attempted Murder, Serious Assault, Robbery, Child Cruelty, Threats, Abduction etc. These crimes are all ‘Victim Based’ which means a crime is recorded for each victim of violent crime even if there are multiple victims involved in the same incident.
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Crime fell from the October result to a low in November, almost half the total recorded in November 2010. As expected, crime recorded did rise in December, although not to the extent suggested by the original forecast figure of 49. The total number of crimes recorded by the end of December (411) was 2% below the 420 recorded last year.
Table of crime by month Group 1 Crime Force Apr 2011-12 45 2010-11 44
May 44 54
Jun 42 45
Jul 41 50
Aug 55 43
Sep 61 33
Oct 47 43
Nov 33 61
Dec 43 47
Jan
Feb
Mar
52
44
52
Central 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 27 19
May 28 29
Jun 20 22
Jul 16 25
Aug 36 19
Sep 34 19
Oct 24 29
Nov 20 38
Dec 15 26
Jan
Feb
Mar
30
23
23
Eastern 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 3 10
May 3 11
Jun 8 7
Jul 9 8
Aug 6 5
Sep 17 6
Oct 8 8
Nov 5 9
Dec 20 10
Jan
Feb
Mar
8
11
11
Western 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 15 15
May 13 14
Jun 14 16
Jul 16 17
Aug 13 19
Sep 10 8
Oct 15 6
Nov 8 14
Dec 8 11
Jan
Feb
Mar
14
10
18
Total % DiffYear End 411 ~ -2% 420 568 Total % DiffYear End 220 ~ -3% 226 302 Total % DiffYear End 79 ~ 7% 74 104 Total % DiffYear End 112 ~ -7% 120 162
Detection Rate 83.7% of all crimes had been detected at the end of December, almost exactly the same as at the end of December 2010 (83.8%). However the result was below the target of 85% and a further 5 detections would have been required in order to achieve target. Relatively low numbers of crimes involved in this category of crimes mean that one or two detections more (or fewer) lead to large fluctuations in the detection rate.
Note: All projections are based on the previous 60 months’ worth of data and take seasonal variations into consideration. These are calculated every three months and illustrated on the graphs by a red-ringed yellow circle.
44
VIOLENT CRIME Dundee
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Group 1 60
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
Policing Dundee Crime: The 26 crimes were recorded in December 2010 had been reduced to 15 in December 2011.
50
Detection Rate:
79.5% of all crimes had been detected against a target of 75.0%. At the end of December last year the detection rate was 74.8%.
40 30 20 10 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Policing Angus
Crime: The graph to the left illustrates the rise and Angus
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Group 1 30
fall in crime recorded this year. The end of November result of 59 was 8% lower than the 64 recorded at the same time last year. However, by the end of December the figure of 79 crimes recorded was 7% higher than at the end of December 2010. 20 crimes recorded in December was exceptionally high - the majority occurring as serious assault and robbery. There did not appear to be any links between the crimes but most were alcohol related. The forecast indicates that crime should return to more ‘normal’ levels in January.
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
25 20 15 10 5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Perth & Kinross
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Group 1 30
Feb
Mar
Detection Rate: 82.3% of all crimes had been detected against a target of 96.0%. 11 further detections would have been required to achieve target.
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
Policing Perth & Kinross
25
Crime: In contrast to last year, crime fell in Novem-
20
ber to below the lower control limit and remained there in December.
15
Detection Rate: The detection rate of 92.9% was just above the target of 92%.
10 5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Source of information:Tayside Police Management Information System
45
ROBBERY Tayside
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Robbery Recorded Crime 40
Policing Tayside
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD)
‘Robbery’ includes crimes of Robbery and Assault with intent to Rob.
35
In contrast to December last year, crime was higher in December 2011. However, the 10 crimes recorded was exactly on the lower control limit.
30 25 20
The graph shows that fluctuations are possible in this category and the number of crimes recorded each month does not necessarily follow a seasonal pattern. However, the three year average does indicate higher results in the coming months.
15 10 5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Cumulatively, to the end of December the 87 crimes recorded this year represented a 16% decrease on the 103 recorded at the end of December 2010.
Table of crimes by month Force 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 10 13
May 9 9
Jun 11 13
Jul 9 9
Aug 10 9
Sep 15 7
Oct 8 8
Nov 5 22
Dec 10 13
Jan
Feb
Mar
20
20
15
Central 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 6 7
May 7 7
Jun 7 8
Jul 2 5
Aug 6 6
Sep 11 4
Oct 5 7
Nov 3 14
Dec 4 11
Jan
Feb
Mar
14
13
8
Eastern 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 0 2
May 0 0
Jun 0 0
Jul 2 0
Aug 1 0
Sep 2 0
Oct 0 1
Nov 0 2
Dec 5 0
Jan
Feb
Mar
0
2
3
Western 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 4 4
May 2 2
Jun 4 5
Jul 5 4
Aug 3 3
Sep 2 3
Oct 3 0
Nov 2 6
Dec 1 2
Jan
Feb
Mar
6
5
4
Total % Diff Year End ~ 87 -16% 158 103 Total % Diff Year End ~ 51 -26% 104 69 Total % Diff Year End ~ 10 100% 10 5 Total % Diff Year End ~ 26 -10% 44 29
Detection Rate 67.8% of crime was detected against a target of 70%. target result.
A further 2 detections would have secured an on-
Source of information:Tayside Police Management Information System
46
ROBBERY Dundee
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Robbery Recorded Crime 35
Policing Dundee Crime: The low November result of 3 was followed by a similar result in December (4) bringing the total at the end of December to 51, 26% lower than at the end of December 2010 (69).
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD)
30 25
Detection Rate: 58.8% of crime was detected against a target of 62%. A further 2 detections would have secured an on-target result.
20 15 10 5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Policing Angus
Crime: Very small numbers of crimes recorded in Angus
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Robbery Recorded Crime 6
Eastern division make the chart look more alarming than it actually is. However, 5 crimes were recorded in the month of December - exactly the same number recorded between April and the end of November. The 5 crimes recorded in December occurred on different days and do not appear to be linked in any way.
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD)
5 4 3
Detection Rate: Only 2 of the crimes recorded in December were detected which reduced the cumulative detection rate from 100% at the end of November to 60% by the end of December against a target of 85%. Small numbers of crimes (and detections) lead to large fluctuations in results in this area. 3 detections more would have secured an on target result.
2 1 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Perth & Kinross
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Robbery Recorded Crime 12
Feb
Mar
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD)
Policing Perth & Kinross
Crime: Crime continued to fall in December when just 1 crime was recorded. The low results in recent months influenced the trendline which, at the end of December, was on a definite downward trajectory.
10 8 6
The three year average and last year’s result would suggest that the numbers may climb in January, February and March.
4 2
Detection Rate: 88.5% of crimes were detected
0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
against a target of 80.0%
Mar
Source of information:Tayside Police Management Information System
47
VANDALISM Policing Tayside Tayside
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Vandalism 700
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
This category includes acts of Vandalism and Malicious Mischief.
The chart to the left shows that results during the first nine months of this year have been well below those recorded last year and in other previous years. All divisions have strived to curb acts of vandalism and the success of those efforts is reflected in the results.
600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Table of crimes by month Force Apr May Jun Jul 2011-12 435 413 290 355 2010-11 424 468 510 421
Aug 382 507
Sep 344 446
Oct 366 565
Nov 318 412
Dec 279 351
Central Apr 2011-12 239 2010-11 209
May 219 237
Jun 133 292
Jul 177 233
Aug 177 282
Sep 162 230
Oct 187 338
Nov 155 226
Dec 118 225
Eastern Apr 2011-12 96 2010-11 120
May 109 107
Jun 71 124
Jul 104 91
Aug 120 110
Sep 84 107
Oct 95 137
Nov 87 91
Dec 101 75
Western Apr 2011-12 100 2010-11 95
May 85 124
Jun 86 94
Jul 74 97
Aug 85 115
Sep 98 109
Oct 84 90
Nov 76 95
Dec 60 51
At the end of December recorded crime for vandalism in Tayside (3182) was 22% lower than at the same time last year (4104) resulting in ’on target’ results for Tayside and the three divisions.
Jan
Feb
Mar
444
472
418
Jan
Feb
Mar
245
262
228
Jan
Feb
Mar
106
120
93
Jan
Feb
Mar
93
90
97
Total % Diff Year End ~ 3182 -22% 5442 4104 Total % Diff Year End ~ 1567 -31% 3010 2272 Total % Diff Year End ~ 867 -10% 1281 962 Total % Diff Year End ~ 748 -14% 1151 870
Detection Rate 30.8% of all crimes of vandalism had been detected at the end of December against a target figure of 32.0%. A further 39 detections would have been required to secure an on-target result.
Source of information:Tayside Police Management Information System
48
VANDALISM Dundee
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Vandalism 400
Policing Dundee Crime: A further reduction in crime recorded in December brought the April to December result to 1567, 31% below the 2272 recorded at the end of December 2010.
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
350 300 250
Detection Rate: 29.0% of crime was detected against the target of 27.5%.
200 150 100 50 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Policing Angus
Crime: The monthly totals this year between April Angus
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Vandalism 250
and December fluctuated between 71 and 120. The December result of 101 was 26 crimes higher than the 75 recorded in December last year but was only just above the three year average and, therefore, not exceptional. The forecast figures indicate that crime may fall again in January before rising towards the end of the fiscal year.
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
200
150
Detection Rate: 30.7% of crime was detected, 6.3 percentage points below target. A further 55 detections would have been required to achieve the target figure of 37%.
100
50
0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Perth & Kinross
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Vandalism 180
Feb
Mar
Policing Perth & Kinross Crime: 60 crimes were recorded in December, just one above the 59 forecast. The graph to the left does show that in recent months crime has fallen steadily. Whilst the December totals for 2010 and 2011 were similar, in January 2011 crime escalated to 93. The forecast figure indicates there may be a rise but perhaps not so pronounced.
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
160 140 120 100 80
Detection Rate: 34.5% of crime was detected, 1.5 percentage points below target. A further 11 detections would have secured the target figure of 36%.
60 40 20 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Source of information:Tayside Police Management Information System
49
DOMESTIC HOUSEBREAKING Tayside
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Domestic Housebreaking Recorded Crime 140
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
120 100 80
Policing Tayside ‘Domestic Housebreaking’ includes those crimes pertaining to residential dwellings. Included are: - Theft by Housebreaking - Housebreaking with intent to Steal - Attempted Housebreaking with intent to enter and steal.
The chart to the left shows that the rise in housebreaking across Tayside reached 79 40 in October (breaching the upper control limit for the first time this year). In contrast, 20 crime fell sharply in November to below the lower control limit. The number of crimes 0 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar recorded in December 2010 (51), the figure forecast for December 2011 (48) and the actual figure recorded (50) were all extremely close. Historical data on which the forecasts are based suggests that there could be a further increase in crime recorded in January. 60
Table of crimes by month Force 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 46 80
May 39 78
Jun 63 96
Jul 60 81
Aug 58 101
Sep 62 69
Oct 77 69
Nov 39 61
Dec 50 51
Jan
Feb
Mar
76
68
44
Central 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 32 57
May 22 56
Jun 36 71
Jul 36 60
Aug 40 72
Sep 33 44
Oct 43 53
Nov 17 38
Dec 38 37
Jan
Feb
Mar
55
39
31
Eastern 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 9 8
May 9 10
Jun 7 16
Jul 5 7
Aug 10 10
Sep 12 8
Oct 11 8
Nov 6 11
Dec 5 4
Jan
Feb
Mar
4
8
3
Western 2011-12 2010-11
Apr 5 15
May 8 12
Jun 20 9
Jul 19 14
Aug 8 19
Sep 17 17
Oct 23 8
Nov 16 12
Dec 7 10
Jan
Feb
Mar
17
21
10
Total % Diff Year End ~ 494 -28% 874 686 Total % Diff Year End ~ 297 -39% 613 488 Total % Diff Year End ~ 74 -10% 97 82 Total % Diff Year End ~ 123 6% 164 116
Detection Rate 36.0% of crime had been detected against the target of 30%. This was a 6.1 percentage point improvement on the 29.9% detection rate recorded at the same time last year.
Source of information:Tayside Police Management Information System
50
DOMESTIC HOUSEBREAKING Dundee
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Domestic Housebreaking Recorded Crime 90
Policing Dundee Crime: The graph to the left illustrates the sharp drop in the number of crimes recorded in November. At the end of December the 297 crimes recorded represented a 39% decrease when compared to the figure last year (488).
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
80 70 60 50
Detection Rate: 34.0% of crime was detected against the target of 26.0%.
40 30 20 10 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Angus
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Domestic Housebreaking Recorded Crime 30
Feb
Mar
Policing Angus
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
Crime: The level of crime recorded fell in November and December, to below the projected figures and returned to similar levels of June and July. At the end of December the 74 crimes recorded represented a 10% reduction on the 82 recorded at the same time last year. However, this was still 7 crimes in excess of the target.
25 20 15 10
Detection Rate: 39.2% of crime was detected against the target of 40.0%. Tantalisingly, one more detection would have achieved target.
5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Perth & Kinross
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2010-11 UCL (Av. +2SD) 3 Year Average
Domestic Housebreaking Recorded Crime
Feb
Mar
2011-12 LCL (Av. -2SD) Forecast
Policing Perth & Kinross Crime: 7 crimes were recorded in December, the second lowest monthly total to date this year. The forecast indicates that the levels of crime may rise in January before falling to around the three year average in March.
30 25 20 15 10
Detection Rate: 39.0% of crime was detected against the target of 40.0%. Again, a further one detection would have secured an on-target result.
5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Source of information:Tayside Police Management Information System
51
ROAD CASUALTIES 2011 saw the start of the Scottish Government’s Road Safety Framework which will run until 2020. The improvements set under the Framework are:
The graph below shows serious injuries by month.
Tayside People Seriously Injured
30% reduction in people* killed 43% reduction in people seriously injured 35% reduction in children killed 50% reduction in children seriously injured 10% reduction in people slightly injured
2010-11
2011-12
3 Year Average
30 25 20
(* people includes children).
15
All percentage reductions are against a baseline of the 5 year average of years 2004-2008 inclusive.
10 5 0
Number of People killed Between April and December 2011, 16 people were killed on the roads of Tayside, 36% fewer than the 25 killed during the same period last year.
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Slight Injuries 567 people received slight injuries as a result of a road collision by the end of December 2011, compared to 553 at the same time last year.
The graph below illustrates that October 2010 recorded the highest result of the year when 6 people lost their lives because of a collision. The highest result to date was November with 4 fatalities.
The graph below illustrates the number of slight casualties by month.
7
Tayside People Killed
2010-11
2011-12
Tayside Slight Injuries
3 Year Average
2010-11
2011-12
3 Year Average
90
6
80 70
5
60
4
50 40
3
30
2
20
1
10 0
0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Apr
Mar
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Number of People seriously injured 154 people were seriously injured by the end of December this year, in contrast to 141 the previous year. It remains to be seen whether the remaining winter months will see an increase in casualties. Included in the 154 people seriously injured were 19 children. This figure was also lower than at the same time last year when 18 children had been seriously injured. Source of information:Roads Policing Unit
52
ROAD CASUALTIES Collisions There were 560 injury collisions recorded on the roads of Tayside between April and the end of December 2011– exactly the same number as at the end of December 2010. The graph below allows for month-on-month comparison between the two years.
Tayside Collisions
2010-11
2011-12
3 Year Average
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Collisions involving a Police Vehicle Between April and the end of December 2011 there were 55 collisions throughout Tayside involving a Police vehicle.
Source of information:Roads Policing Unit
53
ROAD SAFETY Background Delivery of Road Safety in the Tayside area is undertaken by two Road Safety Officers, based in Angus and Perth & Kinross, and the Road Safety Coordinator.
session looking at all the supporting websites which are developed and maintained by Road Safety Scotland. Evaluation of this initiative is almost complete and the indication is showing that the training is worthwhile and appreciated.
The remit for Road Safety staff is wide reaching and encompasses a variety of themes as prescribed in the Scottish Government Road Safety Framework to 2020 where specific casualty reduction targets for Scotland are laid out.
The P6/7 initiative SafeTaysiders, the annual safety event co-ordinated by Tayside Police, took place in Angus and Perth & Kinross during May. This handson event allowed pupils to learn how to deal with a variety of scenarios which could potentially be dangerous.
Road Safety Staff deliver Road Safety Education using national and local resources to communities across Tayside and far from dealing solely with educational establishments also undertake work with a variety of community groups, ethnic minority groups, seasonal workers and others who request assistance.
In the Road Safety set the pupils were offered the opportunity to use the brake reaction tester and “drive” whilst being distracted. This allowed the Road Safety Officer to lead the group in discussing stopping distances, in-car and bus safety as well as the danger of distracting drivers etc.
The Road Safety Co-ordinator ensures that appropriate support is given to relevant local and national campaigns and initiatives. Working with partners allows Road Safety Staff to disseminate pertinent Road Safety information to specific groups and there are very good long–term working relationships with NHS Tayside, Tayside Fire and Rescue and the constituent Local Authorities Social Work, Education and Roads and Transport departments. In June “Driving Ambition” took place in Perth & Kinross. This is a local initiative which gives S5 pupils the opportunity to investigate driving from various angles. Developed and organised by the Western Road Safety Officer, this partnership event took place in all Local Authority Secondary schools within Perth & Kinross and in 2011 two of the four “private” schools also attended the event.
Update The following is an overview of activity since April 2011. This page will regularly feature in the Performance Report and will cover events and activities in some detail. May 11TH saw the launch of the United Nations Decade of Road Safety. The Scottish and UK Government pledged to reduce the number of road traffic casualties in their own country and assist countries, particularly those developing nations where road traffic casualty numbers are extremely high, in reducing casualties through offering practical advice and assistance where possible.
Driving Ambition events also take place in Angus. These events are held throughout the year at the request of the secondary Schools. For the first time, Road Safety Staff joined Roads Policing Unit Officers across the Force to undertake child car seat checks during ‘Operation Bandit’ days. This proved extremely worthwhile as people who would not normally attend car seat checking days were being stopped and appropriate advice given. In three cases it was found that the child passengers should have been in car seats as they were under the legal height and /or age for using the seat belt without being in a car seat. Other issues in respect of transporting children also came to light.
During May and June, Road Safety Staff undertook Primary School Teacher Continuing Professional Development (CPD) training. The theme for this very popular training is local and national Road Safety resources. Teachers attended a half day session where they were shown a short Power Point presentation, detailing the resources which are free to all Primary schools. This was followed by an interactive 54
ROAD SAFETY Road Safety Staff met with Health Visitor Managers to highlight issues which had been raised during the ‘Operation Bandit’ events where members of the public claimed that the reason their child was being carried incorrectly was due to information given to them by their Health Visitor. Health Visitor managers welcomed our approach and new partnership working was instigated.
In September over 300 P6 pupils and their adult assistants underwent National Junior Road Safety Officer induction days across the Force area. Developed and organised by Road Safety Staff in each local authority area, every school in Tayside was invited to send two P6 pupils and an adult assistant to attend a half day event where they learn about the role they can play in promoting Road Safety in their school and local community. The children received resources and prizes for the competitions they will hold in schools to highlight local and national issues.
The Road Safety Co-ordinator carried out in-car safety presentations to prospective child minders attending the Dundee City Council pre-registration training. The Road Safety Co-ordinator made contact with Dundee International Women’s Centre and in-car safety presentations are planned for delivery early in the year to women from ethnic minority groups where English is not the first language.
The annual “Safe Drive Stay Alive” events took place across the Force during November. Organised by Tayside Fire and Rescue, Road Safety Staff and Road Policing Officers played a pivotal part in imparting the pertinent information which the S5 pupils received at the events.
Road Safety Staff undertook a second round of General Road Safety Awareness Days, this time in Arbroath and Perth City. These events were as interactive as possible using various road safety resources to illustrate drink/ drug driving, stopping distances, in-car safety, and safe pedestrian and cycling reminders etc.
December saw the second of the 2011 bi-annual Tayside Road Safety Forum meetings. Chaired by the Road Safety Co-ordinator and attended by head of Road Policing, with representatives from constituent Local Authority Roads, Transport and Infrastructure departments, NHS Tayside, Tayside Fire and Rescue, Tayside Safety Camera Partnership and TACTRAN, the remit of the group states:
Angus Parking Initiative: The Road Safety Officer based in Angus brought together the Road Policing Inspector, Angus Council Roads and Transport and Education Department representatives to investigate ways of relieving parking issues outside Angus Schools. A pilot was undertaken at Arbroath primary schools which followed agreed principles and was completed from August to October 2011.
‘The Tayside Road Safety Forum is designed to offer the opportunity to all parties in Tayside who have an interest in road safety and casualty reduction to meet, share and discuss road safety topics of mutual interest.’
With buy-in from the primary school, members of the public who dropped off or collected children, but parked inconsiderately or dangerously, had their vehicle registration details noted over a two week period. These details were faxed to the Roads Policing Unit and owners whose vehicles appeared twice or more on the list were sent letters detailing the issues that their inconsiderate or dangerous parking was contributing to or causing. Over an identified four week period, more than 70 letters were sent out.
Forum members are encouraged to link specific topics to constituent Community Planning Partnerships single outcome agreements where possible, with particular emphasis on the road safety element of the aforementioned plans or agreements. The Forum will consider the ongoing development of pertinent local and regional initiatives and campaigns to be considered for best practice and potential suitability for consideration of use across neighbouring local authority areas.
Once evaluation of the scheme has been completed, a decision will be taken by the original partners with a view to widening the scheme to other towns in Angus. Source of information:Road Safety Co-ordinator, Roads Policing Unit
55
ROAD SAFETY The Association of Chief Police Officers of Scotland (ACPOS) National Campaigns and Days of Action
•
This year Tayside Police recorded all returns in respect of the campaign via an electronic returns form. This simplifies and speeds up the process. It has been agreed that this type of approach has increased pro-activity and will be used in future campaigns.
December 2011 to January 2012 — The Festive Campaign Between the 5th December 2011 and 3rd January 2012 Tayside Police, along with all the other Scottish Forces, took part in the ACPOS annual festive drink/drug driving campaign.
Source of information:Roads Policing Unit
During the course of the campaign, 43 people were arrested for drink and drug driving offences. The start of the campaign saw an extension to the provisions of the Vehicle Forfeiture Initiative. This meant that, in addition to the existing provisions, drivers who were found to be more than three times the limit for alcohol or who refused any part of the station procedure to test for alcohol or drugs were liable to have their vehicle seized and ultimately forfeited. During the campaign 3 vehicles were seized by virtue of a warrant and a further 2 have been forfeited.
Whilst the main focus of the campaign was on drink and drug driving, other offences which impact on road safety—such as speeding, misuse of mobile telephones and seat belt offences— continued to be targeted. During the campaign : •
248 people were charged with seat belt offences (last year the figure was 132).
•
168 people were charged with mobile telephone offences (last year 122).
577 people were charged with speeding offences (last year 400).
56
STANDARDS OF SERVICE The following paragraphs provide an overview of consultation activity being undertaken across the force and summarises the results for both the Service Satisfaction and Public Perception surveys for the period April to December 2011. Results from Service Satisfaction surveys are used to monitor the extent to which Tayside Police is achieving its published standards of service. The information detailed below includes the indicators, targets and results to date with additional relevant results interspersed. Comparative figures for the commensurate period in 2010, where available, are included in parenthesis or commented on in the narrative. First Contact: The majority of respondents, 85.0% perceived that their contact with the force was to report a crime, 67.2%, or disturbance, 17.8%. When analysed by crime type it was found that 27.6% of contact related to Group 3 crimes (crimes of dishonesty), 18.3% to Group 4 (crimes of vandalism, fire-raising etc), 2.8% to Group 6 (miscellaneous offences), 0.1% for Group 7 (offences relating to motor vehicles) and finally 51.2% to incidents recorded on the force command and control system. Telephone was the preferred method of contact for service users with 11.4% (8.8%) dialling 999 and 68.8% (70.7%) the non-emergency number. Satisfaction with the time taken to answer the 999 call was 96.1%, an improvement of 0.8 percentage points compared to the 95.3% recorded for the same period in 2010. Similarly, satisfaction with the response to the non-emergency number rose 1.6 percentage points from 91.3% to 92.9%. Very high satisfaction ratings were attributed to the courteous and attentive manner of the person dealing with the enquiry at first contact rising from 98.0% in 2010 to 98.5% in 2011. In addition, knowledge about how to deal with the enquiry and an explanation of what would be done as a result of the enquiry both achieved very high satisfaction ratings, improving 2.5 and 2.8 percentage points and finalising at 95.8% and 92.4% respectively. The percentage of respondents who were provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry rose 3.2 percentage points between 2010 and 2011 from 81.8% to 85.0% and exceeded the force target set at 80.0% by some margin. The following chart demonstrates how this indicator has performed against target during the past nine months. The previous year’s results have also been included in the chart for comparison purposes. % of respondents provided w ith nam e of person dealing w ith their enquiry
2011
2010
Target 2011 (80.0%)
90.0 Percentage (% )
84.7 85.0
81.7
83.2
84.1
84.9
84.7
85.0
82.9
Jul-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
80.0 75.0 70.0 May-11
Jun-11
As can be seen from the chart, the force has performed well above target throughout the year, as was the case in 2010, but as the target was based on the three year average (with results lower in 2008 and 2009), it is anticipated that any target set for 2012/13 may prove more challenging.
57
In relation to satisfaction with the way in which respondents were treated at first contact, 93.2% confirmed that they were either ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ with this treatment. This represents an improvement of 2.8 percentage points compared to the 90.4% who provided the same response in the commensurate period in 2010. Overall satisfaction at first contact evidenced a significant 3.1 percentage point improvement compared to the same period the previous year rising from 90.8% to 93.9% and exceeded the 2011/12 target by 2.4 percentage points. The following chart, which maps how the force has performed against target for this question over the past nine months, clearly shows a positive upward trajectory throughout the year finalising at 93.9%. % of respondents satisfied with first contact 2011
2010
Target 2011 (91.5%)
Percentage (%)
100.0 95.0
92.1
92.6
Jun-11
Jul-11
93.7
93.4
94.0
94.0
93.9
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
90.4 90.0 85.0 80.0 May-11
Officer Contact: 77.5% (74.4%) of contact made resulted in a visit from an officer. The majority of visits related to incidents rather than crimes, 42.7%, followed by crimes of dishonesty (Group 3), 33.1%. Of those respondents who received a visit, 97.4% (98.2%) deemed the attending officer courteous and attentive and 94.8% (95.7%) knowledgeable about how to deal with the enquiry. The personal appearance of officers also returned a very high satisfaction rating with 96.8% of service users ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ that the attending officer presented a smart and professional image. This represents a minimal 0.7 percentage point improvement when compared to the results for the same period the previous year. Over two thirds of respondents, 68.5% (67.2%) confirmed that they received details of how to contact the officer should they have any further queries. Treatment by the attending officer and overall satisfaction with the officer both reported very high satisfaction levels at 93.0% and 92.6% respectively. Both of these figures, however, did represent a minimal downturn in satisfaction from the 94.2% and 93.3% reported in 2010.
58
Response and Ongoing Enquiries: The percentage of service users who received an update on the progress of their enquiry achieved a 0.5 percentage point improvement compared to the results the previous year rising to 60.6%. The following chart illustrates how this indicator has performed against target during the past nine months accompanied by the equivalent results in 2010. % of service users w ho received an update
2011
2010
Target 2011 (65.0%)
80.0
Percentage (%)
75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0
61.3 56.8
57.7
57.7
May-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
59.9
60.0
60.7
60.6
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
55.0 50.0 Aug-11
Whilst an upward trend can be seen in the chart, there is still some way to go before the target set at 65.0% is achieved. 90.3% (86.7%) of service users who received an update confirmed that they were satisfied with the update they received, albeit some respondents did complain that they had to request an update when nothing was forthcoming. Of those who did not receive an update, 60.9% (58.0%) felt that they should have been updated regarding the outcome of the enquiry/incident they reported – the majority of which related to incidents recorded on the force command and control system. Community Policing: A ‘community policing’ section has been included in the Service Satisfaction survey since the beginning of October and the following paragraphs summarise the findings. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at this stage due to the small sample size (n=261). These questions have also been replicated in the Public Perception survey with the results reported later in this section of the document. •
• •
•
•
51.8% of service users thought that the current level of police patrols in their neighbourhood was ‘about right’ for their community needs. Conversely, 47.7% felt it was ‘too little’ and a minimal 0.5% that it was ‘too much’. The majority of respondents, 76.0%, felt reassured when they witnessed an officer on patrol in their neighbourhood. Over half of the respondents confirmed that they knew nothing about the community officers who looked after their neighbourhood, 57.9%, whilst a further 19.7%, although unable to identify their local officer by sight or name, knew how to contact them should the need arise. 22.4% of residents were able to recognise their community officer either by name, sight or both. 66.3% of service users agreed that officers understood the issues that mattered in their neighbourhoods and 59.8% felt that officers were dealing with such matters. Overall, 66.5% of respondents had confidence in the police in their neighbourhood. Taking everything into account, 68.5% of service users thought that community officers were doing a ‘good’ or ‘very good’ job in their area.
59
Satisfaction Overall: Overall satisfaction for the customer experience with the service provided by Tayside Police failed to achieve the target of 85.0% but returned an improvement of 0.7 percentage points compared to the same period the previous year rising from 82.1% to 82.8%. Further analysis also highlighted a significant difference in opinion in terms of satisfaction with overall service with those reporting a crime more likely to be satisfied with the service they received (89.6%) than those who contacted the police for reasons other than to report a crime/ disturbance (78.2%). The following chart highlights how the force has performed towards achieving target during the past nine months. Results for 2010 are also included in the chart for comparison purposes. % of respondents satisfied with overall service 2011
2010
Target 2011 (85.0%)
Percentage (%)
90.0 85.0 79.3
80.4
81.2
Jun-11
Jul-11
82.7
82.7
83.2
83.5
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
82.8
80.0 75.0 70.0 May-11
Dec-11
It is clear from the chart that satisfaction levels continue on a positive upward trajectory albeit there is still some way to go before the target of 85.0% is met. Some of the comments made by respondents as to the reasons for their ‘satisfaction’ or ‘dissatisfaction’ with overall service include: Positive comments— “Impressed at the quick response and how efficiently the incident was dealt with.” “Very good level of contact in person and via phone calls.” “Officer was very helpful and understanding. There has been a marked improvement since his intervention.” Negative comments - “Lack of communication between officers.” “Nothing seems to have been done.” “Would have liked the person punished.”
60
PUBLIC PERCEPTION Results from the Public Perception survey provide an insight into the types of crimes/offences and antisocial behaviour that cause the public concern in their neighbourhoods and also their expectations of Tayside Police in relation to its service delivery. 2700 questionnaires were distributed by post to members of the public between April and December 2011. To date 824 completed forms have been returned for analysis thus yielding a response rate of 30.5% (30.1%). The following paragraphs provide results for the period April to December 2011 with comparisons made with the same period the previous year either indicated in parenthesis or commented upon in the narrative. Neighbourhood as a safe place to live: The majority of respondents, 91.3%, perceived their neighbourhood to be a safe place to live. This indicates a minimal improvement of 0.8 percentage points compared to the previous year when 90.5% of respondents were of the same opinion. Perception about the level of crime in neighbourhood: Respondents were asked to what extent they thought that levels of crime had increased or decreased in their neighbourhood over the past year. Seven out of ten respondents, 72.0% (71.4%) felt that crime levels had remained the same or decreased in the past year with the remaining 28.0% (28.6%) of the opinion that crime had increased. It is important to note that for this question, 27.4% of all respondents answered ‘don’t know’ and these have been removed from the results for this question. Main issue of concern in neighbourhood: Antisocial behaviour
22.1 21.3
Dangerous/careless driving
21.0 22.3 13.4 14.8
Drug dealing or drug abuse
12.6
Other*
11.9 10.6
Housebreaking Vandalism/graffiti
7.0
Motor vehicle crime Robbery
Dec-11 Dec-10
8.9
8.2 7.7
Alcohol related crime Assault
15.0
1.2 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0
* Other includes issues such as dog fouling, litter and fly tipping
As can be seen from the above chart, the three main issues of concern to residents in their neighbourhood, without being prompted, were ‘antisocial behaviour (including youths causing annaoyance)’, 22.1%, ‘dangerous/careless driving’, 21.0%, and ‘drug dealing or drug abuse’, 13.4%. These results reflect the same primary concerns as residents in the previous year with only the top two issues changing position.
61
Some comments from respondents about why these issues caused them concern are included below: ‘Antisocial behaviour’ -
“Intimidation by youths.” “Neighbours making noise late at night.”
‘Dangerous/careless driving’ -
“Risk to public by speeding.” “Cars speeding along main roads especially near schools.”
‘Drug dealing or drug abuse’ -
“Impact that drugs have on neighbourhood.” “Drug paraphernalia left lying around.”
Prevalence of crime/offences in neighbourhood: Respondents were asked to report up to three crimes/offences they perceived to be most prevalent in their neighbourhoods. The responses have been analysed as a multiple choice question and will therefore not total 100%. The top three issues thought to be most common in neighbourhoods were: ‘Antisocial behaviour’ – 44.6% ‘Vandalism/graffiti’ – 36.9% ‘Dangerous/careless driving’ – 33.4% Interestingly, 13.5% (12.2%) of respondents stated that there was ‘no crime’ in their neighbourhood. The following chart illustrates the full results for this question. 44.6 44.8
Antisocial behaviour 36.9 37.1
Vandalism/graffiti 33.4
Dangerous/careless driving Drug dealing or drug abuse
24.0 24.1
Alcohol related crime 16.9 18.6
Housebreaking
Dec-11 Dec-10
13.5 12.2
No crime Motor vehicle crime
10.2
13.3
9.0 7.6
Robbery
5.8 5.1
Assault Other
38.3
25.8 26.6
2.0 2.3
Concerns at becoming a victim of crime in neighbourhood: A 1.4 percentage point increase was noted in respect of respondents being concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their area whereby 37.4% stated that they were either ‘fairly’ or ‘very concerned’ compared to 36.0% in 2010. Those respondents who recorded their concerns at becoming a victim of crime were then asked to report on the issues they feared they could become a victim of. The following chart depicts the findings:
62
Housebreaking
44.8 44.5
Antisocial behaviour 25.0 25.6
Dangerous/careless driving
24.7 27.4
Vandalism/graffiti
Dec-11
22.3 20.2
Robbery
Dec-10
17.9 18.2
Motor vehicle crime Assault
16.1 15.6
Drug dealing or drug abuse
14.8 16.3
Alcohol related crime
14.4 16.3
Other
50.3
42.6
0.5 0.8
The above chart indicates a similar representation of concerns as in the previous year although a steep increase is evident in the percentage of respondents who were concerned at becoming the victim of a break-in compared to the equivalent period in 2010. Feelings of safety in neighbourhood: Perhaps not unexpectedly, results for feelings of safety walking alone in the neighbourhood proved higher during the day than after dark. Results for feelings of safety walking alone in the neighbourhood during the day did, however, return a slight downturn in confidence falling to 94.8% in 2011 compared to 96.0% in 2010. Conversely, feelings of safety after dark evidenced an improvement, rising 1.6 percentage points from 61.3% to 62.9%. The chart below illustrates how this question has performed over the past nine months.
Feelings of safety during the day and after dark During the day After dark
Percentage (%)
100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0
97.2
95.8
95.1
95.0
94.8
95.3
95.1
94.8
62.1
62.4
63.8
64.5
63.3
63.4
64.0
62.9
May-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
5.3% of respondents confirmed that a fear of crime prevented them from taking part in their everyday activities. This represents a 1.6 percentage point rise compared to the 3.7% reported for the same period in 2010. When asked to elaborate on why they felt fearful about participating in their normal activities, ‘fear of being mugged’ was the main comment quoted.
63
Community policing: A ‘community policing’ section has been included in the Public Perception survey since the beginning of October and the following paragraphs summarise the findings. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at this stage due to the small sample size (n=273). Results for the corresponding questions in the Service Satisfaction survey have been included in parenthesis for comparison purposes. • • •
•
•
45.0% (51.8%) of residents thought that the current level of police patrols in their neighbourhood was ‘about right’ for their community needs. Conversely, 55.0% (47.7%) felt it was ‘too little’. 62.8% (76.0%) of respondents felt reassured when they witnessed an officer on patrol in their neighbourhood. Over three quarters of respondents confirmed that they knew nothing about the community officers who looked after their neighbourhood, 75.9% (57.9%), whilst a further 12.8% (19.7%), although not able to identify their local officer by sight or name, knew how to contact them should the need arise. 11.3% (22.4%) of residents were able to recognise their community officer either by name, sight or both. 52.1% (66.3%) of respondents agreed that officers understood the issues that mattered in their neighbourhoods and 46.9% (59.8%) felt that officers were dealing with such matters. Overall, almost two thirds of residents had confidence in the police in their neighbourhood, 60.3% (66.5%). Taking everything into account, 57.2% (68.5%) of residents thought that community officers were doing a ‘good’ or ‘very good’ job in their area.
It can be seen from the above information that service users (Service Satisfaction survey) appear to have a greater awareness, than members of the general public (Public Perception survey), of the community officers who look after their neighbourhood and also an increased confidence in the officers’ abilities to deal with the issues that matter to them in their communities. Respondents were invited to comment on the ways they preferred to be kept informed about actions being taken by community officers in their neighbourhood and the chart below illustrates the findings. 58.4 60.8
Local new spapers Information at shops
30.4
Public meetings
16.9
Public Perception Service Satisfaction
19.1 18.6
Local radio 11.1 11.4
Community surgeries
9.5
Tayside Police w ebsite 3.4
19.8
7.3 7.3 8.4
Social netw orking Text messaging
26.6
20.6 17.7
Information at libraries
Other
22.9 21.8
Face to face updates
40.8
2.7
8.9
The chart above quite clearly shows that respondents from both the Public Perception and Service Satisfaction surveys overwhelmingly preferred articles in ‘local newspapers’ and ‘information at shops’ as a means of keeping them informed about community officer activity in their neighbourhoods.
64
SUPPORTING DELIVERY
C
orporate support forms an important role in ensuring that appropriate resources are in place to deliver an efficient and effective service to the public.
The challenging economic climate means that robust monitoring and reporting processes are instrumental in ensuring that the force is on track to deliver its objectives within the resources available. At the same time, the Scottish Government has set stretching environmental and energy reduction targets for Scotland. As a major employer in Tayside, Tayside Police is committed to demonstrating its contribution to this aim.
MEASURES 9.
CORPORATE SUPPORT
10.
PARTNERSHIP - SCOTTISH POLICE SERVICES AUTHORITY
65
PERSONNEL Police Staff At the end of December, 3.9% of available working days had been lost to sickness absence, an improvement of 0.7 of a percentage point on the result at the end of December 2010 (4.6%). The number of Police Staff employed has fallen since last year; at the end of December 2010 there were 624 staff and the number of days sickness absence taken was 4728 (average 7.6 days per person). At the end of December 2011 3528 days were lost but the number of staff had reduced to 545 (an average of 6.4 days per person).
SICKNESS ABSENCE Police Officers Cumulatively to the end of December 2011 sickness absence accounted for 7512 days lost. This resulted in an on-target sickness absence rate for Tayside of 3.9, a slight improvement on the December 2010 result of 4.0%. More than half the days lost (54%) were lost through 77 periods of long-term sickness absence (29 days or over), a further 28% were lost through 920 periods of short-term sickness absence (under 7 days) and the remaining 18% was accounted for by 82 periods of mediumterm absence of between 8 and 28 days. Tayside Police OFFICERS
2010-11
In terms of length of time staff were off sick, 49% of days lost was accounted for by 50 periods of long-term absence, 28% through 416 periods of short-term absence and the remaining 23% was lost through 57 periods of medium-term absence.
2011-12
Working Days Lost/Sickness Absence 1400.0 1200.0
The graph below illustrates clearly the reductions in days lost by Tayside Police Staff since the beginning of April 2011. Even allowing for the reduction in the numbers of Police Staff employed, the reductions are still considerable.
1000.0 800.0 600.0 400.0 200.0
Tayside Police STAFF Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
2010-11
2011-12
Working Days Lost/Sickness Absence 700.0
0.0 Mar
600.0 500.0
Central Division: lost 2434 days to the end of December, an average of 5.4 days per officer. This resulted in a sickness absence rate of 3.4% (within the 4% target) compared to 3.8% recorded at the same time last year.
400.0 300.0 200.0 100.0
Eastern Division: lost 2253 days and the sickness absence rate was 5.5%, a result which failed to achieve the target of 4.0% despite being slightly better than the 5.6% recorded at the same time last year.
0.0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Central Division: sickness absence rose from 3.5% at the end of December 2010 to 3.8% at the end of December 2011 accounted for by 487 days lost through sickness absence – an average of 6.4 days per member of staff. This result was within the target of 4.5%.
Western Division: recorded a sickness absence rate of 4.3%, a slight increase of 0.2 percentage points when compared to the result at the end of December 2010 (4.1%) and representative of an average of 6.8 days per officer. This result failed to achieve target (4.0%).
Eastern Division: 505 days were lost through sickness absence which produced a below tar-
66
PERSONNEL get (4.5%) result of 5.6% and averaged out at 9.5 days per member of staff Western Division: only 2.7% of available working days were lost through sickness absence; 270 days were lost, an average of 4.4 per member of staff.
MODIFIED DUTIES AND TIME OFF IN LIEU Modified Duties Modified duties are defined as temporary short term rehabilitation duties or working conditions approved to assist an individual’s return to the full extent of their duties following illness or injury by permitting return to work of a less demanding capacity. There were 77 officers on modified duties as at 6 January 2012. This accounted for 6% of overall police officer strength. Of the 77 modified duty officers, 19 were on modified protected duties (for example, pregnancy related). Time Off In Lieu (TOIL) In line with Police Regulations, officers are compensated in respect of time spent on duty after normal tour ends or where they have been recalled to duty etc. These additional hours can be taken as payment or accrued as time off in lieu of payment. A record is kept of the number of TOIL hours accrued by officers. As at 6 January 2012, 40,116 TOIL hours had been accrued by police officers, 11,545 in Central Division, 9,658 in Eastern Division, 10,629 in Western Division and the remaining 8,284 in other areas of the force.
Source of Information: Sickness Absence and Turnover Rates: Corporate Resources and Training Department,
67
STAFF DEVELOPMENT Staff Development The Staff Development Unit at Tayside Police consists of a team of training professionals, Police Officers, Administration Support, Special Constable Co-ordinator and a Staff Support Adviser. They work together with colleagues from across the force, as well as the Scottish Police College, to ensure that the officers and staff of Tayside Police have the skills and knowledge to deliver a high quality service to our local communities.
Training Course Utilisation Rate Between April and the end of December 2011, the Staff Development Unit offered a total of 1202 courses to officers and staff of Tayside Police.
MONTHLY TRAINING COURSE UTILISATION 2011/12 Courses Held
Utilisation Rate
250
There was a total of 8992 student places available on these courses and 8020 students were able to take advantage of these opportunities, producing a cumulative utilisation rate of 89% Month alone utilisation rates ranged from 82.8% in October to 92.5% in November.
94.0% 91.4%
91.7%
92.5%
92.0%
91.2%
200
89.1% 87.0%
90.0% 88.7%
88.0%
87.5%
150
86.0% 84.0%
100
82.8%
82.0% 80.0%
50
78.0%
The graph to the right illustrates the monthly courses held and the monthly utilisation rate. In total, 10,420 training days were delivered between April and the end of December.
111
170
192
75
104
164
135
168
83
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
0
76.0% Jan
Feb
Mar
Source of information: Staff Development Unit
Training Course Evaluation: Table of Responses To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements
Aug - Dec 2011 1716 responses
The pre-course information was ‌ received in sufficient time appropriate and with necessary detail clear and easily understood
93.7% 93.9% 96.9%
The content of the course was‌ well structured easy to follow delivered effectively
98.4% 98.9% 98.6%
well organised the correct length sufficient for my objectives relevant to m objectives Taking everything into consideration, the course met my expectations
99.4% 93.5% 98.0% 98.0%
The course itself was
98.8%
The above table shows the results of analysis of course evaluation forms completed by officers and staff who attended training courses run by the Staff Development .
Source of information: Performance & Planning Unit
68
HEALTH AND SAFETY Health & Safety The Force Safety Adviser is responsible for provision of professional advice on all occupational health and safety matters to ensure the safety of all employees and public who work in or visit police buildings and to ensure in the force meets its statutory obligations. On a monthly basis the number of accidents that have occurred during the year will be published together with the causation factors. The chart below shows the volume of accidents/injuries occurring on a quarterly basis against a 3 year average.
Total accidents
Total Accidents - Tayside Police 2008 - 2011
3 yr av 2008-11
45 40
40 35
34
35
33
30
29
27
25 20
36
34
36
34
28
27
26
20
15 11
10 5 0 Q1~08
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1~09
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1~10
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1~11
Q2
Q3
The table below shows the data for April to December (2008 to 2011) and includes Accidents of Police Officers and Staff, Violent incidents to Police Officers resulting in lost time and the Total number of incidents resulting in lost time. The table also details the number of days lost and those incidents reported to the Health & Safety Executive.
Health & Safety: April to December Accidents to Police Officers and Staff Violent incidents to Police Officers resulting in lost time Total number of incidents resulting in lost time Total number of days lost Incidents reported to the Health & Safety Executive
2011
2010
2009
2008
73 5 15 680 10
98 7 21 193 15
84 10 30 955 21
94 3 25 904 15
Source of information: Corporate Resources Dept.
69
HEALTH AND SAFETY The following table provides the reason for accident/injury between April and December 2011 and for the commensurate months the previous year. Exposure to violence was the main cause (45%). Assaults accounted for 17% of the total and 16% of injuries were sustained during arrests.
2011-12 Number Causation factors: April to December Road Traffic collisions Manual handling Slips, trips, falls Training ~ in house and at the Scottish Police College Exposure to violence Assaults Injuries caused by sharp objects Injuries during arrests Others Total
9 2 19 4 158 59 5 57 36 349
% of Total
3% 1% 5% 1% 45% 17% 1% 16% 10%
2010-11 Number
5 5 28 9 177 84 11 68 45 432
% of Total
1% 1% 6% 2% 41% 19% 3% 16% 10%
There has been a reduction in almost every area, with the exception of days lost, in comparison with April to December last year. The number of lost time accidents and incidents reported to the Health & Safety Executive are on course to be the best ever recorded. Individual classifications of incident type could also produce best ever figures, notably exposure to violence and injured during arrest. Two long term injuries and a broken ankle have contributed to the increase in the number of days lost from last year.
70
APPENDIX A: TAYSIDE POLICE PERFORMANCE FRAME-
71
72
73
This document is available on the force intranet and web site. It can be viewed there in large print by increasing the magnification on screen.
You can listen to this document as a PDF file by clicking on the ‘View’, menu, selecting ‘Read out aloud’ and ensuring your volume control is turned up.
Ongoing improvement depends on feedback from contributors and users and we would welcome your views. If you require further information about this report please use the contact below.
WHO TO CONTACT Performance and Planning Unit 0300 111 2222 or email performanceandplanning@tayside.pnn.police.uk Twitter: @statspolice
www.tayside.police.uk