DECEMBER 2012
TAY S I D E P O L I C E Contents Introduction
3
Background
4
Guidance
5
Summary of Results
6
Policing Tayside
11
Policing Dundee
15
Policing Angus
21
Policing Perth & Kinross
28
Public Protection
35
Resources & Assets
41
Welcome This report covers a range of force performance and is available on Tayside Police web site every month.
COMMUNITY PRIORITIES
It provides an overview of local performance results and public feedback. Areas covered are: - Dundee Local Policing Area - Angus Local Policing Area - Perth & Kinross Local Policing Area
VISION AND VALUES
STANDARDS
The report incorporates information from local Inspectors about what they are doing to tackle crime and antisocial behaviour in your community. Results are presented at Section (local community ) level.
OF SERVICE
REVIEW
MANAGE
ENGAGE
RESULTS
RESOURCES
AND LISTEN
2
Introduction DELIVERING LOCAL POLICING
B
uilding public confidence and trust is how Tayside Police aims to improve satisfaction with the quality of service provided to its communities. This is achieved through the effective delivery of policing services which meet the needs of local communities. It is about ease of access to services, giving the public a voice in order to influence how the force responds to issues that matter to them, delivering appropriate and robust interventions, working with partners, providing feedback to the public and keeping them informed of progress and improvement.
C
orporate support forms an important role in ensuring that appropriate resources are in place to deliver an efficient and effective service to the public.
The force uses performance indicators to gather information about performance, quality of service and public perception. These are listed below. They are derived from priorities identified through the annual strategic assessment and also include issues, such as housebreaking and vandalism, identified through public feedback.
The challenging economic climate means that robust monitoring and reporting processes are instrumental in ensuring that the force is on track to deliver its objectives within the resources available.
Key Performance Indicators 1.
2.
Standards of Service •
First Contact : overall satisfaction rating
•
First Contact: caller provided with the name of the call handler
•
Proportion of people who received an update on the progress of their enquiry
•
Overall customer experience of the service provided by the police
Crime and Detection Rates •
Violent Crime
•
Robbery
•
Vandalism
•
Domestic Housebreaking
3.
Road Casualties
4.
Proportion of working time lost to sickness absence
In addition, a programme of regular surveys tests local public opinion on how neighbourhoods are policed in order that where action is required, it can be initiated in a timely manner.
3
Background
P
erformance Indicators are derived from detailed policing plans and business plans outlining what Local Policing Areas and supporting departments intend to deliver in support of the priorities set out in the three-year Tayside Policing Plan 20112014. These form the basis for this performance publication. Two community priorities: ‘Public Safety’ and ‘Public Reassurance’, underpin the policing plan . Analysis of data and context1 with respect to performance indicators, combined with the outputs from public consultation, provide an indication of the extent to which the force is succeeding in contributing to improved community outcomes.
What this will tell us about performance Tayside Police Key Performance Indicators help the force define and measure progress toward the achievement of standards of service and force objectives. Monitoring results over the longer term allows the force to see where sustained improvement occurs, or identifies challenges which require to be addressed.
Consulting, engaging and listening Public consultation and feedback runs as a thread throughout performance management and provides information that lets us know whether we are doing things right. ‘Customers’ include our staff.
FOOTNOTE: 1.Context Indicators are not measures of performance per se; rather they provide additional background information in relation to the demands placed upon the force and the environment in which it operates.
4
Guidance INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
performance, lying outwith the upper or lower control limits, is commented upon in the summary.
B
aselines for improvement adopt the methodology used in previous years, incorporating the most recent three years average performance as a starting point for improvement.
In addition, areas of police business not contained within the key performance indicators (such as fleet, health and safety, staff development) are reported on in dashboard style, subject to data being available, with a view to producing a balanced view of organisational activity. This promotes the diverse range of services that support operational policing.
For some KPIs a slight adjustment is applied to the three-year average target which may take account of developing trends or patterns over the last 36 months. The target may be adjusted up or down accordingly to ensure that it is both challenging and realistic in terms of achievement .
P
ublication of Performance Results. This document is published monthly on the force web-site in accordance with the statutory requirement under Section 13 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 2003 which covers public performance reporting in relation to the publication of performance information and evidence of continuous improvement.
Improvement Targets are agreed annually through a process of consultation with territorial commanders and heads of departments. These are ratified by the Force executive and Tayside Joint Police Board.
R
esults are colour-coded against the following criteria: On or above target Below target
Results are presented as a ‘Dashboard’ for ease of viewing. Further context is provided at the beginning of the document as a summary. Behind the scenes, results over time are monitored using charts, to which upper and lower control limits are applied.
P
erformance reporting. Where performance is adhering to the ‘norm’, i.e. remaining within upper and lower control limits, minimal reporting takes place. Areas of concern or exceptional
5
Summary of results: April - December 2012 1.
Groups 1 to 4 collectively evidenced a 1.8% decrease in crime after 9 months of the year which was representative of 200 fewer crimes.
STANDARDS OF SERVICE
Two out of four customer satisfaction targets were achieved for the third quarter period April to December 2012, with particular attention drawn to the ‘updating the public’ indicator where results exceeded the 2012/13 target set at 65.0% by 2.6 percentage points finalising at 67.6%.
The graph below illustrates that, in the main, the pattern to the end of August had been similar (although lower) to that of last year. However, in the following months the pattern altered and the monthly results were much higher than those recorded the previous year.
Overall satisfaction at first contact evidenced a 0.4 percentage point improvement compared to the same period the previous year rising from 93.9% to 94.3% and exceeded the force target set at 94.0% by 0.3 percentage points.
Despite the lower levels of crime recorded in the earlier months of the year, It is clear to see that the results increased month on month. Whilst the sharp incline was tempered after October and monthly results plateaued the trendline is still on an upward trajectory.
The proportion of respondents who were provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry fell marginally from 85.0% in 2011/12 to 83.8% in 2012/13, and failed to achieve the target set at 85.0%.
Tayside
Significant improvements were evident in relation to service users receiving an update on the progress of their enquiry increasing a statistically significant 7.0 percentage points to 67.6% compared to 60.6% in 2011/12. As previously stated, this result exceeded the target set for 2012/13 of 65.0%. In addition, further analysis undertaken on this indicator highlighted that 81.3% of customers who had reported a crime were updated on progress with their enquiry with a lesser proportion, 45.4%, who had made contact for other reasons, confirming that they had received an update.
1700
2012-13 Forecast
1600 1500
R2 = 0.71
1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 Apr
Satisfaction with the overall service provided by Tayside Police returned an improvement of 1.0 percentage point compared to the commensurate figure last year, rising from 82.8% to 83.8%, just below the target of 85.0%.
2.
2011-12 3 Year Average Linear (2012-13)
Groups 1-4
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
The force achieved 5 out of 9 crime-related targets for recorded violent crime and vandalism, and detection rates for violent crime, robbery and housebreaking.
CRIME
Performance in relation to overall crime groups :
The detection rate for groups 1 to 4 crimes (42.6%) failed to achieve target by 3.9 percentage points and a further 426 detections would have been required in order to achieve target.
• Violent crime (Group 1) - a decrease of 25.4%
(103 crimes) • Crimes of indecency (Group 2) - a decrease of
6.7% (24 crimes)
The following graph illustrates that the detection rate for Groups 1 to 4 crimes has fallen month on month to date this year—in contrast to the levels of crime (see above). In order to curb this downward trend, detections would need to rise in the coming months. By the end of December, the detection rate of 42.6% was 5 percentage points lower than at the same time last year.
• Crimes of dishonesty (Group 3) - an increase
of 3.1% (215 crimes) • Malicious mischief, vandalism etc (Group 4) a decrease of 8.5% (288 crimes)
(Data was sourced directly from the crime reporting system on 4 January and may differ slightly to other published results due to some reclassification of crimes and any additional ‘no crime’ status being applied in the intervening period.)
6
Summary of results: April - December 2012 Tayside
2011-12
Groups 1-4 Detection Rate
3.
2012-13
3 Year Average
60.0%
55.0%
50.0%
45.0%
For the purpose of this report, results quoted below represent the views of the general public (Public Perception). It should be noted that these results are based upon a sample size of 732 of 2700, a response rate of 27.1%.
40.0%
35.0% Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
•
94 robberies were recorded, 8 more that at the same time last year and 4 more than the interim target for December. The detection rate for vandalism (29.6%) was just 1.4 percentage point below target (42 detections). Results until August had been above the 31.0% target but fell in August and have failed to recover.
•
569 domestic housebreakings were recorded this year, 52 crimes above the interim December target of 517.
•
Considerably higher than average results recorded in Dundee LPA and Perth & Kinross LPA during April and May adversely affected the cumulative result. The graph below illustrates the lower levels recorded in the summer months. The graph also illustrates that the historical fall in November and December did not materialise this year and, conversely, crimes increased. •
Tayside
2011-12
Domestic Housebreaking
3 Year Average
90
2012-13
•
80 70 60 50 40
•
30 20 10 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
COMMUNITY POLICING
The community policing questions are replicated in both the Service Satisfaction and Public Perception surveys in order to compare perceptions of community policing from a service user perspective (those who have had direct contact with the police – Service Satisfaction survey) and as a member of the general public, who may not have had contact with the police (Public Perception survey).
Jan
Feb
Mar
7
52.0% of residents thought that the current level of police patrols in their neighbourhood was ‘about right’ for their community needs. Conversely, 47.6% felt it was ‘too little’ and a minimal 0.4% believed that there was ‘too much’ patrolling. The majority of respondents, 74.0%, felt reassured when they witnessed an officer on patrol in their neighbourhood whilst 7.3% stated that it caused them concern. One in five respondents had no opinion either way. 12.5% of respondents confirmed that they were able to recognise their community officer either by name, sight or both. A further 14.7%, although unable to identify their local officer by sight or name, knew how to contact them should the need arise. 48.4% of residents stated that they would like to know the identify of the community officers who looked after their neighbourhood whilst, interestingly, a quarter (24.4%), did not feel there was a need for them to know their community officers. ‘Local newspapers’ were the preferred medium for respondents to be kept informed about actions being taken by officers in their communities. 56.0% of residents agreed that officers understood the issues that mattered in their neighbourhoods and 47.9% felt that officers were dealing with such matters. Overall, 61.3% of respondents had confidence in the police in their neighbourhood. Taking everything into account, 64.0% of the general public thought that community officers were doing a ‘good’ or ‘very good’ job in their area.
Summary of results: April - December 2012 4.
TELEPHONE RESPONSE
ABSENCE RATE: POLICE OFFICERS
Between April and the end of December, 35,783 emergency calls were received and 87.9% of these were answered within 10 seconds. 184,437 nonemergency calls were received and 63.7% were answered within 40 seconds. The trend lines, based on monthly response time results for both emergency and non-emergency calls to date this year, are both downward facing ~ more acutely in the case of non-emergency calls as illustrated by the
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0% 2012-13 2011-12 3-year average
1.0%
Emergency calls Non-emergency calls Linear (Emergency calls)
100.0%
Community Policing Division
0.0% Apr
90.0%
May
Jun
Jul
Aug Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
R2 = 0.9574 80.0% 70.0%
The December police staff result of 5.3% was a deterioration on the 3.9% recorded at the same time last year and failed to meet the target of 4.0%. In terms of average number of days lost per member of staff, this rose from 6.4 at the end of September last year to 8.7 this year.
60.0% 2
R = 0.7888 50.0% 40.0% Apr
M ay
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
M ar
In total, 4506 days were lost through sickness absence, 24% were attributable to absences of 7 days or less, 17% through absences of between 8 and 28 days and the remaining 59% through absences of 29 days or more.
grey dotted lines on the chart below: This year, the Force Contact Centre (FCC) has experienced high levels of staff abstractions through sick leave. Staffing resilience had a negative impact on performance and, in an effort to improve overall resilience, a ‘Call Handling to Dispatch’ training migration plan was implemented in August and, as a result, the cascading results were halted in September.
The following graph illustrates that this year’s results not only exceeded those of last year but were also ABSENCE RATE: POLICE STAFF
Community Policing Division
6.0%
5. SICKNESS ABSENCE
5.0%
The absence rate for police officers was 3.7% at the end of December and met the target of 4.0%. This was an improvement on the 3.9% recorded at the same time last year. At the end of December 2012 the average number of days lost per officer was 5.8 compared to 6.1 at the end of December last year.
4.0% 3.0% 2.0%
In total, 7255 days were lost through sickness absence, 34% were attributable to absences of 7 days or less, 16% through absences of between 8 and 28 days and the remaining 50% through absences of 29 days or more.
2012-13 2011-12 3-year average
1.0% 0.0% Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
above the three year average.
The following graph illustrates the lower levels recorded earlier this year and the fact that the gap has narrowed in recent months.
6.
ROAD CASUALTIES
Between April and the end of December, 17 adult fatalities were recorded, one more than at the same time last year. A further 121 people were seriously
8
Summary of results: April - December 2012 were concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their area and when asked to comment on the issues which caused them concern, ‘housebreaking’, 46.5% (50.3%), followed by ‘antisocial behaviour’, 37.8% (44.8%) and ‘dangerous/careless driving’, 25.4% (25.0%), were the major issues of concern.
injured, 24% fewer than the 159 people seriously injured at the same time last year. Included in these figures were children ~ 19 had been seriously injured during the first nine months of last year compared to 12 this year, a reduction of 36.8%. No children were killed during April to December this year, compared to 1 child fatality during the same period last year.
Feelings of safety walking alone in local neighbourhoods both during the day and after dark evidenced a decline in confidence in 2012/13 compared to 2011/12 whereby 93.9% (94.8%) of the public felt safe during the day and 59.1% (62.9%) felt safe after dark.
The total number of people killed or seriously injured (138) was 37 fewer than last year—a reduction of 21%. From April 2011, the force adopted the government’s Road Safety Framework Targets to the year 2020.
7.
A minority 2.0% of residents stated that a fear of crime prevented them from taking part in their everyday activities. This represented a reduction of 3.3 percentage points compared to the 5.3% who provided the same response in 2011/12.
PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF CRIME
Nine out of ten respondents in Tayside, 90.4%, perceived their neighbourhood to be a safe place to live. This was a reduction of 0.9 percentage points compared to the same period the previous year when 91.3% of respondents were of the same opinion.
Service Delivery When asked to provide views on the force’s service delivery, first in terms of the importance of certain activities and then how well those activities were executed, every aspect of service delivery evidenced an improvement in performance compared to the same period the previous year. This was particularly apparent for ‘providing a visible presence’ which returned a statistically significant improvement of 8.2 percentage points, rising from 44.6% in 2011/12 to 52.8% in 2012/13. In addition, ‘dealing with antisocial behaviour’ also returned a statistically significant improvement in performance increasing 5.8 percentage points to 73.1% compared to 67.3% the previous year.
Whilst opinions remained fairly static between 2012/13 and 2011/12 in relation to those who felt that crime levels had remained the same during the period – six out of ten respondents - a 2.0 percentage point improvement was recorded for those who felt that crime had decreased rising from 12.8% to 14.8% and similarly, a minimal 5.4 percentage point reduction in those who felt that crime had increased, falling from 28.0% to 22.6%. The main issues of concern to residents when asked unprompted were ‘drug dealing/drug abuse’, 17.4% (13.1%), followed by ‘speeding’, 15.7% (16.4%) and ‘housebreaking’, 11.3% (8.9%). This provides a similar representation of concerns as in the previous year with ‘drug dealing/drug abuse’ and ‘speeding’ changing position and ‘housebreaking’ replacing ‘antisocial behaviour’. In terms of prevalence of crime in local neighbourhoods, four in ten respondents, 39.4% (44.6%) cited ‘antisocial behaviour’ as a common problem in their local area, followed by dangerous/careless driving’, 33.1% (33.4%) and ‘vandalism/graffiti’, 31.1% (36.9%). This result indicates that opinions mirrored those of the previous year where ‘antisocial behaviour’ was deemed the most common issue blighting local communities. 34.3% (37.4%) of respondents confirmed that they
9
10
POLICING TAYSIDE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Tayside Land Area: 7,528 square kilometres Population: 405,720 Police Officers: 1245 Police Staff: 511 Special Constables: 130 Mid year population estimates - most recent - published by The General Register Office for Scotland on 30 June 2011 Staff profile as at 3O September 2012 and is based upon headcount - which includes full and part-time working.
Angus Local Policing Area Perth & Kinross Local Policing Area
Population 110,630 Land area 2,182 sq km
Population 149,520 Land area 5,286 sq km
Dundee Local Policing Area Population 145,570 Land area 60 sq km
11
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS SCORECARD APRIL 2012 - DECEMBER 2012 POLICING TAYSIDE
KEY On or above 3 year average
POLICING DUNDEE
POLICING ANGUS
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% / pp Change
2012-13 Target
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Target
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Target
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
94.3%
93.9%
0.4
94.0%
93.8%
91.3%
2.5
94.0%
95.1%
91.8%
3.3
94.0%
94.1%
97.4%
-3.3*
85.0%
83.8%
85.0%
-1.2
85.0%
80.8%
80.7%
0.1
85.0%
82.1%
84.3%
-2.2
85.0%
87.0%
88.9%
-1.9
65.0%
67.6%
60.6%
7.0*
65.0%
69.0%
56.0%
13.0*
65.0%
69.5%
59.7%
9.8*
65.0%
65.5%
64.8%
0.7
% customers who received an update following their contact to report a crime
~
81.3%
73.4%
7.9
~
78.4%
71.3%
7.1
~
84.9%
73.3%
11.6
~
81.3%
74.9%
6.4
% customers who received an update following their contact for reasons other than to report a crime
~
45.4%
45.5%
-0.1
~
52.4%
40.8%
11.6
~
46.4%
44.4%
2.0
~
40.2%
50.8%
-10.6
85.0%
83.8%
82.8%
1.0
85.0%
83.4%
79.5%
3.9
85.0%
87.3%
83.0%
4.3
85.0%
81.7%
85.2%
-3.5
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: (*denotes a statistically significant change in results)
First Contact: Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact First Contact:% of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry
Updating the Public: Overall % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry
12
Customer Experience: Overall satisfaction rating of the service provided by Tayside Police
(Response Rate)
CRIME
936/2700 (34.7%)
289/972 (29.7%)
257/756 (34.0%)
390/972 (40.1%)
Groups 1-4 crime includes: Group 1- Violent Crime; Group 2 - Sexual Offences; Group 3 - Dishonesty and group 4 - Fire-raising, Malicious Mischief etc.
Groups 1-4 recorded
No target
11018
11218
-1.8%
No target
5521
5772
-4.3%
No target
2454
2388
2.8%
No target
3043
3058
-0.5%
- Detection rate
46.5%
42.6%
47.6%
-5.0
45.5%
43.1%
47.1%
-4.0
47.5%
43.0%
45.4%
-2.3
48.0%
41.5%
50.4%
-8.9
520
302
405
-25.4%
273
131
218
-39.9%
104
59
75
-21.3%
143
112
112
0.0%
85.0%
85.1%
84.0%
1.1
80.0%
82.4%
78.9%
3.5
91.0%
93.2%
85.3%
7.9
93.0%
83.9%
92.9%
-8.9
133
94
86
9.3%
89
48
51
-5.9%
8
11
9
22.2%
36
35
26
34.6%
- Detection rate
70.0%
77.7%
66.3%
11.4
62.0%
77.1%
54.9%
22.2
85.0%
81.8%
66.7%
15.2
80.0%
77.1%
88.5%
-11.3
Vandalism recorded
4650
2892
3170
-8.8%
2300
1319
1563
-15.6%
1250
869
861
0.9%
1100
704
746
-5.6%
- Detection rate
31.0%
29.6%
30.8%
-1.3
28.0%
27.7%
29.0%
-1.3
32.0%
30.6%
30.8%
-0.2
34.0%
31.7%
34.6%
-2.9
700
569
491
15.9%
445
370
292
26.7%
95
69
75
-8.0%
160
130
124
4.8%
31.0%
33.0%
36.3%
-3.2
28.0%
28.4%
34.6%
-6.2
33.0%
40.6%
38.7%
1.9
33.0%
42.3%
38.7%
3.6
Violent Crime recorded - Detection rate Robbery recorded
Domestic Housebreaking recorded - Detection rate
POLICING TAYSIDE
2012-13 Target 94.0%
Below 3 year average
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS SCORECARD APRIL 2012 - DECEMBER 2012 POLICING TAYSIDE
POLICING ANGUS
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
20 12 -1 3 R es u lt
20 11 -1 2 R es ult
% /pp C ha ng e
20 12 -1 3 R es u lt
20 11 -1 2 R es ult
20 12 -1 3 R es u lt
20 11 -1 2 R es ult
26
17
16
6.3%
N/A
2
0
***
N/A
5
4
25.0%
N/A
10
12
-16.7%
People seriously injured
222
121
159
-23.9%
N/A
27
42
-35.7%
N/A
27
46
-41.3%
N/A
67
71
-5.6%
Children killed
1
0
1
-100.0%
N/A
0
0
***
N/A
0
0
***
N/A
0
1
-100.0%
Children seriously injured
25
12
19
-36.8%
N/A
5
10
-50.0%
N/A
2
6
-66.7%
N/A
5
3
66.7%
Sickness Absence - police officers
4.0%
3.7%
3.9%
-0.2
4.0%
4.2%
3.4%
0.7
4.0%
4.8%
5.5%
-0.7
4.0%
3.3%
4.3%
-1.1
Sickness Absence - police staff
4.0%
5.3%
3.9%
1.4
4.0%
4.9%
3.8%
1.0
4.0%
5.8%
5.6%
0.2
4.0%
5.3%
2.7%
2.6
ROAD CASUALTIES
13
RESOURCES
COMMUNITY PRIORITIES
VISION AND VALUES
STANDARDS OF SERVICE
REVIEW RESULTS
MANAGE RESOURCES
ENGAGE AND LISTEN
POLICING TAYSIDE
20 12 -1 3 Ta rg et
% /pp C ha ng e
% / p p C h an ge
20 12 -1 3 Ta rg et
20 11 -1 2 R es ult
% /pp C ha ng e
20 12 -1 3 R es u lt
People killed
Below 3 year average
20 12 -1 3 Ta rg et
20 12 -1 3 Ta rg et
KEY On or above 3 year average
POLICING DUNDEE
TAYSIDE CRIME IN MORE DETAIL PERIOD APR to DEC CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2011/2012 Made known
December Alone
2012/2013
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
GROUP 1 ~ Crimes of Violence Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others GROUP 1 - TOTAL
8 57 0 167 86 61 5 8 9 4
7 54 0 139 57 63 3 7 7 3
87.5% 94.7% 83.2% 66.3% 103.3% 60.0% 87.5% 77.8% 75.0%
7 29 0 114 94 35 0 13 9 1
7 29 0 93 73 34 0 12 7 2
100.0% 100.0% 81.6% 77.7% 97.1% 92.3% 77.8% 200.0%
-1 -28 0 -53 8 -26 -5 5 0 -3
-12.5% -49.1% -31.7% 9.3% -42.6% -100.0% 62.5% 0.0% -75.0%
1 5 0 15 13 4 0 4 0 0
1 5 0 12 9 4 0 3 0 0
100.0% 100.0% 80.0% 69.2% 100.0% 75.0% -
405
340
84.0%
302
257
85.1%
-103
-25.4%
42
34
81.0%
58 1 171 46 37 46
37 1 100 17 17 39
63.8% 100.0% 58.5% 37.0% 45.9% 84.8%
67 6 154 19 37 52
38 5 120 28 21 45
56.7% 83.3% 77.9% 147.4% 56.8% 86.5%
9 5 -17 -27 0 6
15.5% 500.0% -9.9% -58.7% 0.0% 13.0%
8 0 17 0 2 5
2 1 18 2 0 4
25.0% 105.9% 0.0% 80.0%
359
211
58.8%
335
257
76.7%
-24
-6.7%
32
27
84.4%
491 190 255 135 302 229 14 174 4573 240 42 13 340 49
178 30 92 35 89 119 14 137 2621 90 42 18 223 11
36.3% 15.8% 36.1% 25.9% 29.5% 52.0% 100.0% 78.7% 57.3% 37.5% 100.0% 138.5% 65.6% 22.4%
569 225 252 189 381 196 14 135 4300 272 42 11 485 191
188 40 74 36 103 84 14 104 2174 34 42 6 233 71
33.0% 17.8% 29.4% 19.0% 27.0% 42.9% 100.0% 77.0% 50.6% 12.5% 100.0% 54.5% 48.0% 37.2%
78 35 -3 54 79 -33 0 -39 -273 32 0 -2 145 142
15.9% 18.4% -1.2% 40.0% 26.2% -14.4% 0.0% -22.4% -6.0% 13.3% 0.0% -15.4% 42.6% 289.8%
70 35 31 25 44 28 3 19 480 40 2 2 58 28
23 3 3 2 5 7 3 17 247 9 3 3 29 10
32.9% 8.6% 9.7% 8.0% 11.4% 25.0% 100.0% 89.5% 51.5% 22.5% 150.0% 150.0% 50.0% 35.7%
7047
3699
52.5%
7262
3203
44.1%
215
3.1%
865
364
42.1%
124 3170 113
35 977 79
28.2% 30.8% 69.9%
113 2892 114
50 855 75
44.2% 29.6% 65.8%
-11 -278 1
-8.9% -8.8% 0.9%
8 325 6
3 113 7
37.5% 34.8% 116.7%
3407
1091
32.0%
3119
980
31.4%
-288
-8.5%
339
123
36.3%
11218
5341
47.6%
11018
4697
42.6%
-200
-1.8%
1278
548
42.9%
72 10 227 93 3 601 248 216 1704 48 86
73 10 229 91 3 593 239 213 1707 51 75
101.4% 100.0% 100.9% 97.8% 100.0% 98.7% 96.4% 98.6% 100.2% 106.3% 87.2%
47 16 194 61 4 519 188 179 1503 52 70
47 16 194 60 3 505 179 170 1499 48 64
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 75.0% 97.3% 95.2% 95.0% 99.7% 92.3% 91.4%
-25 6 -33 -32 1 -82 -60 -37 -201 4 -16
-34.7% 60.0% -14.5% -34.4% 33.3% -13.6% -24.2% -17.1% -11.8% 8.3% -18.6%
3 1 19 9 1 49 21 14 104 6 8
3 1 19 10 1 47 18 14 106 6 7
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 111.1% 100.0% 95.9% 85.7% 100.0% 101.9% 100.0% 87.5%
3308
3284
99.3%
2833
2785
98.3%
-475
-14.4%
235
232
98.7%
14526
8625
59.4%
13851
7482
54.0%
-675
-4.6%
1513
780
51.6%
GROUP 2 ~ Crimes of Indecency Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
GROUP 3 ~ Crimes of Dishonesty Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 ~ Malicious Mischief, vandalism etc. Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
GROUP 5 ~ Other crimes Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
14
Policing Dundee: Community Summaries ~ April to December 2012 SECTION 1: CITY CENTRE/MARYFIELD/EAST END
SECTION 2: LOCHEE/WEST END
Main areas of public concern: drug dealing/drug abuse, youths causing annoyance and housebreaking
Main areas of public concern: drug dealing/drug abuse, vandalism/graffiti and housebreaking CRIME Highlights • Reduction of 32.8% in crimes of violence (19 fewer victims)
CRIME Highlights • Reduction of 26.8% in violent crime (15 crimes). • Reduction in vandalism of 18.1% (51 crimes) Performance alert! • 94.4% increase in the number of crimes of domestic housebreaking recorded—from 36 to 70. 13 recorded in the month of December—highest monthly total to date this year.
DETECTION RATE Highlights • Improvement in detection rate for domestic housebreaking from 25.0% to 33.8% STANDARDS OF SERVICE Highlights • 85.4% of customers expressed overall satisfaction with the service provided - the highest percentage across LPA and the only section above LPA target
DETECTION RATE Performance alert! • Detection rate for crimes of dishonesty down from 64.3% to 51.8%
PUBLIC PERCEPTION Highlights • 76.5% of respondents thought the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year— best result across LPA
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY Inspector Steve Main said: ‘I was pleased to note that there were significant reductions in violent crime and vandalism equating to 66 less victims of crime. I was, however, concerned that there had been a large increase in domestic housebreakings. My officers are fully aware of this and to address the problem immediately we have increased proactive patrols and associated proactive searching which has led directly to the arrest of a number of individuals for domestic housebreaking and other crimes of dishonesty. To provide medium to long term solutions I have requested a full problem profile from the analysts to develop appropriate prevention, intelligence and enforcement solutions.
SECTION 3: STRATHMARTINE/COLDSIDE Main areas of public concern: drug dealing/ abuse, vandalism/graffiti and housebreaking CRIME Highlights • Violent crime reduced by 43.4% (23 fewer victims) • Crimes of dishonesty—reduction of 5.8% (50 fewer victims)
The reporting period of December tends to see a rise in shoplifting and crimes of dishonesty with the approach of Christmas and it is disappointing to note that despite putting in additional police officers and other resources through a Festive Policing Plan that there was a decrease in detection rates. I would, however, like to reassurance the community that the comparable running total for the Dundee Local Policing Area, Group 1-4 crimes (which includes crimes of dishonesty) over the last 4 years shows that the total of offences recorded between April and December 2012 is lower than any of the previous 3 years.’
STANDARDS OF SERVICE Highlights • 88.2% of customers received an update following their contact with the police to report a crime—best result across LPA TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY Inspector Douglas Winter said:
‘The performance information highlighted for Section 3 for December was, again, very encouraging. The (* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
15
Policing Dundee: Community Summaries ~ April to December 2012 DETECTION RATE Highlights • Improvement of 10.1 percentage points in the detection rate for violent crime from 80.4% to 90.5% Performance alert! • 25.2 percentage point decrease in the detection rate for domestic housebreaking from 47.0% to 21.7%
reduction in violent crime and crimes of dishonesty was significant, particularly as this meant that fewer people were victims of crime. From a personal point of view, it was very satisfying to see that Downfield and Hilltown based officers consistently provided the public with updates on their crime enquiries and that this is being acknowledged in the impressive results reflected in the Customer Satisfaction information. Following my request last month for local communities to assist us to prevent/ detect crimes of housebreaking, I am pleased to report that, as a result of local people reporting suspicious activity, several criminals were arrested in relation to crimes of dishonesty. This not only led to a positive outcome for these crimes, but I am also confident that it deterred further offences by these individuals.
STANDARDS OF SERVICE Highlights • Significant increase of 21.7 percentage points from 50.0% to 71.7% for customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry—best result across LPA PUBLIC PERCEPTION Highlights • 91.5% of residents who responded to the survey rated their neighbourhood as a safe place in which to live—best result across LPA • 91.3% of respondents stated that they felt safe walking alone in their neighbourhood during the day—best result across LPA
December saw police forces throughout Scotland actively involved in the annual festive road safety campaign. Downfield officers supported the campaign by focussing upon areas in the section, such as Harestane Road and Laird Street, where a clear road safety risk exists due to the presence of local schools. Officers at these locations operating speed detection equipment reminded motorists of the need to drive carefully and within speed limits. While most drivers were conscious of their speed, several did require the officers to take action in relation to speeding.
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY Inspector Kevin Williams said: It was very pleasing to see a sustained reduction in overall Group 1 to 4 crimes.
I am aware that inappropriate driving in the Strathmartine and Coldside areas is of public concern, particularly in the vicinity of schools, and officers will continue to take appropriate action throughout the year to deter drivers who fail to acknowledge the restrictions in place.’
Our efforts are focused on maintaining this improvement, but also we are working hard to improve our detections for crimes that have already occurred, especially housebreakings. However, whilst recent months saw a fall in the number of housebreakings, the volume of housebreakings that took place earlier in the year continues to influence our performance figures in this area.
SECTION 4: NORTH EAST/BROUGHTY FERRY Main areas of public concern: housebreaking, drug dealing/drug abuse and speeding
Once again, the positive figures that are recorded in the standards of service performance is encouraging, as they point towards a sustained improvement in this area, which is welcome.’
CRIME Highlights • Reduction in crimes of violence of 58.8% (30 fewer victims) - best decrease across LPA • A 34.1% decrease in vandalism (169 fewer crimes) - best decrease across LPA
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
16
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: LOCAL POLICING AREA SCORECARD APRIL 2012 - DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 1 City Centre, Maryfield & East End
POLICING DUNDEE
SECTION 2 Lochee & West End
SECTION 3 Strathmartine & Coldside
SECTION 4 North East & Broughty Ferry
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% / pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
Groups 1-4
5521
5772
-4.3%
1614
1574
2.5%
1470
1418
3.7%
1341
1452
-7.6%
1096
1328
-17.5%
- Detection rate
43.1%
47.1%
-4.0
50.7%
58.3%
-7.6
42.3%
44.5%
-2.2
37.7%
43.0%
-5.4
39.4%
41.0%
-1.5
131
218
-39.9%
41
56
-26.8%
39
58
-32.8%
30
53
-43.4%
21
51
-58.8%
- Detection rate
82.4%
78.9%
3.5
75.6%
76.8%
-1.2
74.4%
82.8%
-8.4
96.7%
75.5%
21.2
90.5%
80.4%
10.1
Indecency (G2)
148
187
-20.9%
58
63
-7.9%
31
39
-20.5%
35
41
-14.6%
24
44
-45.5%
- Detection rate
72.3%
53.5%
18.8
86.2%
71.4%
14.8
64.5%
56.4%
8.1
62.9%
51.2%
11.6
62.5%
27.3%
35.2
Dishonesty (G3)
3814
3680
3.6%
1270
1148
10.6%
1024
949
7.9%
816
866
-5.8%
704
717
-1.8%
- Detection rate
45.3%
52.6%
-7.3
51.8%
64.3%
-12.5
45.0%
49.1%
-4.1
38.4%
44.0%
-5.6
42.2%
49.0%
-6.8
Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4)
1428
1687
-15.4%
245
307
-20.2%
376
372
1.1%
460
492
-6.5%
347
516
-32.8%
- Detection rate
30.3%
30.2%
0.2
32.2%
29.6%
2.6
29.8%
25.5%
4.2
30.7%
37.2%
-6.5
29.1%
27.1%
2.0
48
51
-5.9%
19
15
26.7%
13
16
-18.8%
8
11
-27.3%
8
9
-11.1%
- Detection rate
77.1%
54.9%
22.2
63.2%
40.0%
23.2
69.2%
62.5%
6.7
112.5%
63.6%
48.9
87.5%
55.6%
31.9
Vandalism
1319
1563
-15.6%
231
282
-18.1%
342
339
0.9%
420
447
-6.0%
326
495
-34.1%
- Detection rate
27.7%
29.0%
-1.3
30.3%
27.3%
3.0
25.7%
24.8%
1.0
28.1%
36.5%
-8.4
27.6%
26.3%
1.3
370
292
26.7%
70
36
94.4%
80
72
11.1%
105
101
4.0%
115
83
38.6%
28.4%
34.6%
-6.2
30.0%
33.3%
-3.3
33.8%
25.0%
8.8
30.5%
31.7%
-1.2
21.7%
47.0%
-25.2
Violent Crime (G1)
17
Robbery
Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate
Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.
POLICING DUNDEE
CRIME
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DUNDEE LPA SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL to DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 1 City Centre/ Maryfield/East End
POLICING DUNDEE
SECTION 2 Lochee/ West End
SECTION 3 Strathmartine/ Coldside
SECTION 4 North East/ Broughty Ferry
%/pp Change
%/pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
95.1%
-3.2
94.5% 92.8%
1.7
94.6%
89.6%
5.0
94.0%
90.0%
4.0
85.0%
80.8% 80.7%
0.1
74.5%
83.3%
-8.8
79.1% 81.3%
-2.2
87.2%
81.5%
5.7
82.5%
78.2%
4.3
65.0%
69.0% 56.0% 13.0*
65.5%
64.1%
1.4
68.3% 58.1% 10.2
70.5%
55.4%
15.1
71.7%
50.0% 21.7*
% of customers who received an update following their contact to report a crime
78.4% 71.3%
7.1
74.4%
80.0%
-5.6
78.9% 67.6% 11.3
88.2%
74.3%
13.9
73.0%
66.7%
6.3
% of customers who received an update following their contact for reasons other than to report a crime
52.4% 40.8%
11.6
47.4%
47.4%
0.0
50.0% 46.4%
3.6
48.1%
40.0%
8.1
68.8%
33.3%
35.5
83.4% 79.5%
3.9
83.5%
87.2%
-3.7
85.4% 80.0%
5.4
84.4%
76.1%
8.3
79.7%
78.5%
1.2
First Contact: % of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry
Updating the Public: Overall % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry
18
Customer Experience: Overall satisfaction 85.0% rating of the service provided by Tayside Police Response Rate
289/972 (29.7%)
69/225 (30.7%)
76/270 (28.2%)
77/243 (31.7%)
67/234 (28.6%)
Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the very small sub-sample sizes. First Contact
- Improvement in satisfaction with service at first contact from 91.3% to 93.8%. - A minimal improvement in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 80.7% to 80.8%. Updating the Public
- A statistically significant improvement in updating the public from 56.0% to 69.0%. This result achieves the force target set at 65.0%. When analysed by reason for contact - 78.4% of those who reported a crime were updated compared to 71.3% the previous year. Similarly, an 11.6 percentage point improvement was evident in relation to those whose contact was for reasons other than to report a crime whereby 52.4% received an update compared to 40.8% in 2011. Customer Experience
- Improvement in overall customer experience from 79.5% to 83.4%.
POLICING DUNDEE
2011-12 Result
2011-12 Result
2012-13 Result
2012-13 Result
% / pp Change
91.9%
service provided at first contact
2011-12 Result
2.5
First Contact: Overall satisfaction rating for
2012-13 Result
93.8% 91.3%
(*denotes a statistically significant change in results)
2012-13 Target
94.0%
Customer Satisfaction
DUNDEE LPA SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION ~ APRIL - DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 4 North East/ Broughty Ferry
SECTION 3 Strathmartine/ Coldside
SECTION 2 Lochee/ West End
SECTION 1 City Centre/ Maryfield/East End
POLICING DUNDEE 2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
85.0%
-3.6
65.1%
73.5%
-8.4
83.9%
84.6%
-0.7
80.8%
84.1%
-3.3
91.5%
91.1%
0.4
69.0%
73.4%
-4.4
57.9%
72.0%
-14.1
76.5%
67.3%
9.2
73.7%
69.8%
3.9
66.7%
83.3%
-16.6
‌During the day
88.8%
90.1%
-1.3
86.1%
91.2%
-5.1
87.3%
87.7%
-0.4
90.2%
87.3%
2.9
91.3%
93.8%
-2.5
‌After dark
47.0%
49.1%
-2.1
32.5%
45.4%
-12.9
42.9%
38.1%
4.8
48.0%
45.2%
2.8
60.3%
62.5%
-2.2
54.1%
54.3%
-0.2
67.4%
54.5%
12.9
53.4%
61.9%
-8.5
54.9%
56.7%
-1.8
43.8%
46.1%
-2.3
Police Visibility % of residents who perceived 45.4% that Tayside Police performed 'very' or 'fairly' well at providing a visible presence
40.6%
4.8
46.3%
44.4%
1.9
43.2%
38.3%
4.9
43.5%
38.0%
5.5
48.9%
43.1%
5.8
(*denotes a statistically significant change in results)
Neighbourhood as a safe place to live % of residents who rated their neighbourhood as a safe place to live Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year
19
Feelings of safety % of residents who felt safe walking alone in neighbourhood
Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood
Drug dealing/drug abuse (26.7%)
Top 3 issues that cause most Housebreaking (15.7%) concern in neighbourhoods Vandalism/graffiti (11.6%) Response Rate
219/972 (22.5%)
Drug dealing/drug abuse (27.0%) Youths causing annoyance (13.5%) Housebreaking (13.5%)
43/225 (19.1%)
Drug dealing/drug abuse (37.7%) Vandalism/graffiti (15.1%) Housebreaking (11.3%)
63/270 (23.3%)
Drug dealing/drug abuse (24.4%) Vandalism/graffiti (14.6%) Housebreaking (14.6%)
53/243 (21.8%)
Housebreaking (24.4%) Drug dealing/drug abuse (14.6%) Speeding (12.2%)
60/234 (25.6%)
POLICING DUNDEE
2012-13 81.4%
Public Perception
POLICING DUNDEE: Crime in more detail PERIOD APR to DEC CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2011/2012 Made known
December Alone
2012/2013
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
GROUP 1 ~ Crimes of Violence Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others
1 27 0 98 51 27 5 4 1 4
1 25 0 79 28 29 3 3 1 3
100.0% 92.6% 80.6% 54.9% 107.4% 60.0% 75.0% 100.0% 75.0%
6 13 0 50 48 9 0 2 2 1
5 13 0 41 37 7 0 2 1 2
83.3% 100.0% 82.0% 77.1% 77.8% 100.0% 50.0% 200.0%
5 -14 0 -48 -3 -18 -5 -2 1 -3
500.0% -51.9% -49.0% -5.9% -66.7% -100.0% -50.0% 100.0% -75.0%
0 3 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0
218
172
78.9%
131
108
82.4%
-87
-39.9%
16
14
87.5%
34 0 68 30 16 39
17 0 31 11 8 33
50.0% 45.6% 36.7% 50.0% 84.6%
28 2 53 11 20 34
17 1 38 7 9 35
60.7% 50.0% 71.7% 63.6% 45.0% 102.9%
-6 2 -15 -19 4 -5
-17.6% -22.1% -63.3% 25.0% -12.8%
3 0 5 0 1 4
1 1 4 1 0 4
33.3% 80.0% 0.0% 100.0%
187
100
53.5%
148
107
72.3%
-39
-20.9%
13
11
84.6%
292 105 114 56 178 121 12 82 2409 104 24 5 150 28
101 17 28 11 48 54 12 67 1442 29 24 9 92 2
34.6% 16.2% 24.6% 19.6% 27.0% 44.6% 100.0% 81.7% 59.9% 27.9% 100.0% 180.0% 61.3% 7.1%
370 110 92 69 275 111 11 88 2208 137 29 6 217 91
105 23 32 16 60 41 11 69 1183 17 29 5 109 29
28.4% 20.9% 34.8% 23.2% 21.8% 36.9% 100.0% 78.4% 53.6% 12.4% 100.0% 83.3% 50.2% 31.9%
78 5 -22 13 97 -10 -1 6 -201 33 5 1 67 63
26.7% 4.8% -19.3% 23.2% 54.5% -8.3% -8.3% 7.3% -8.3% 31.7% 20.8% 20.0% 44.7% 225.0%
48 13 6 8 37 17 2 14 247 23 2 0 19 8
16 2 0 1 3 3 2 12 131 3 3 2 15 2
33.3% 15.4% 0.0% 12.5% 8.1% 17.6% 100.0% 85.7% 53.0% 13.0% 150.0% 78.9% 25.0%
3680
1936
52.6%
3814
1729
45.3%
134
3.6%
444
195
43.9%
60 1563 64
15 454 40
25.0% 29.0% 62.5%
51 1319 58
26 366 41
51.0% 27.7% 70.7%
-9 -244 -6
-15.0% -15.6% -9.4%
3 136 3
1 59 3
33.3% 43.4% 100.0%
GROUP 4 - TOTAL
1687
509
30.2%
1428
433
30.3%
-259
-15.4%
142
63
44.4%
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
5772
2717
47.1%
5521
2377
43.1%
-251
-4.3%
615
283
46.0%
43 4 99 59 2 327 147 133 787 25 57
44 4 100 58 2 319 140 131 786 28 51
102.3% 100.0% 101.0% 98.3% 100.0% 97.6% 95.2% 98.5% 99.9% 112.0% 89.5%
16 8 75 32 2 268 102 114 696 28 39
16 8 75 31 1 259 97 107 693 24 37
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.9% 50.0% 96.6% 95.1% 93.9% 99.6% 85.7% 94.9%
-27 4 -24 -27 0 -59 -45 -19 -91 3 -18
-62.8% 100.0% -24.2% -45.8% 0.0% -18.0% -30.6% -14.3% -11.6% 12.0% -31.6%
2 0 8 4 0 28 10 13 62 3 4
2 0 8 5 0 28 10 13 63 3 3
100.0% 100.0% 125.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 101.6% 100.0% 75.0%
GROUP 5 - TOTAL
1683
1663
98.8%
1380
1348
97.7%
-303
-18.0%
134
135 100.7%
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
7455
4380
58.8%
6901
3725
54.0%
-554
-7.4%
749
418
GROUP 1 - TOTAL
0 3 100.0% 0 5 83.3% 6 85.7% 0 0 0 0 0 -
GROUP 2 ~ Crimes of Indecency Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
GROUP 3 ~ Crimes of Dishonesty Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 ~ Malicious Mischief, vandalism etc. Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others
GROUP 5 ~ Other crimes Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
20
55.8%
Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April to December 2012 from 35.0% to 42.1%
SECTION 1: FORFAR & KIRRIEMUIR
STANDARDS OF SERVICE Highlights • A significant improvement of 19.1 percentage points in the percentage of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 46.2% to 65.3%
Main areas of public concern: drug dealing/drug abuse, speeding & youths causing annoyance CRIME Performance alert! • 50.0% increase in crimes of violence from 16 to 24 • Increase in crimes of dishonesty of 32.0% (129 more crimes)
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY Inspector Hamish Gray said:
‘I note the Performance Alert in respect of vandalisms in my Section, but this admittedly high figure is a result of a large number of such offences which were committed in June and July. Montrose Community Officers Tracy Brown and Alistair Hutchison, with the assistance of several Special Constables, continue to identify and engage with youths who regularly come to adverse attention for unruly and antisocial behaviour , encouraging them to take part in the many diversionary activities that are available to them. The Friday Night Project is still attracting a large number of youths, and other activities such as Tae Kwan Do, Football Training by Links Park Community Trust and classes in Beauty Therapy, are all very well attended.
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY Inspector Ally Robertson said:
‘The most recent figures reflect our own findings in the community that we have experienced an increase in crimes of dishonesty and violence gradually throughout this year. What is worth pointing out from these selected figures is the 100% detection rate for crimes of violence. This clearly demonstrates our commitment to community safety and focusing on bringing the small minority of these offenders to justice before our local Courts. As the year progressed we tried to match resources to the challenges of increasing levels of crime and this will continue throughout the coming months. Our style of improving visibility and responding to community concerns is not only the right thing to do but obviously works as the people of Forfar and Kirriemuir have informed us that this style has improved their feelings of safety despite this increase in statistics. Our commitment is undiminished and we will continue to put maximum time and effort into ensuring this community remains a safe place to live, work in and visit.’
I am also pleased to report that officers from Brechin and Montrose made a significant contribution to the 'Get Ready For Winter' and 'Winter Safety Campaign' initiatives. The extreme weather conditions that were forecast for the month materialised in the form of heavy and persistent rainfall which, as everyone will no doubt be aware, caused considerable damage to many road surfaces all over the county. Extreme wintry conditions are still being forecast, and I would ask all motorists to ensure that their vehicles are ready to cope with them. With regards to other issues which some residents have expressed concern about, such as drug abuse and speeding vehicles, I can confirm that local officers continue to address both matters with a considerable degree of success.
SECTION 2: MONTROSE & BRECHIN Main areas of public concern: speeding, drug dealing/abuse & youths causing annoyance CRIME Performance alert! • 35.9% increase in vandalism from 195 to 265
During the month of December, officers working in Brechin and Montrose continued to employ the preventative approach when addressing crime and disorder. This approach is taken with a view to protecting residents from becoming the victims of crime, particularly necessary in this time of austerity where crime in general, but specifically crimes of dishonesty, is on the increase. They did this by carrying out high visibility foot and mobile patrols
DETECTION RATE Highlight • 7.1 percentage point improvement in detection rate for domestic housebreaking
(* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
21
Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April to December 2012 throughout both towns, and it is very pleasing to note that this was recognised and commented upon by the members of the public who completed last month's survey. Indeed, it is gratifying to see the high levels of satisfaction and confidence in the police service that continue to be expressed by local residents.’
offering crime prevention advice in order to make people more aware of their personal security and the safety of their property, thus deterring criminals. Our commitment to Operation After Dark continued in December, and it is notable that reported housebreaking showed a reduction of 11.8% and other crimes of dishonesty dropped by a similar figure (10.8%) Crime Prevention works!
SECTION 3: ARBROATH
I was pleased to see that our customer satisfaction results reflected the positive performance of local officers in reducing and preventing crime . More and more residents now believe that crime is reducing in their area, and I hope this is because they are able to see a improvement in this area. This is coupled with the fact that less and less (34.3 percentage point reduction) people are fearful of becoming a victim of crime in their community. A major objective of our local policing plan is to translate our efforts into ensuring that local people feel safer in their community, and I honestly believe that there is tangible progress being made towards this.
Main areas of public concern: drug dealing/drug abuse, speeding & youths causing annoyance CRIME Highlights • All measures of recorded crime had reduced. Overall, a 16.9% reduction for groups 1 to 4—149 fewer victims of crime. STANDARDS OF SERVICE Highlights • 94.6% of customers who responded to the survey stated that they were satisfied with the service provided by the police. This was the best result across the LPA.
In the weeks ahead officers will continue to address speeding and dangerous driving, particularly given the potential for poor road conditions in the early new year. We will also continue our commitment to reduce crime locally, and aim to improve our visibility in the local community.’
PUBLIC PERCEPTION Highlights • 84.4% of residents who responded to the survey thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year—a significant 24.9 percentage point improvement on the 59.5% recorded at the same time last year. • 21.2% of residents said they were concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood, a significant improvement of 34.3 percentage points on the result at the same time last year (55.6%)
SECTION 4: CARNOUSTIE Main areas of public concern: speeding, youths causing annoyance & antisocial behaviour & dangerous driving CRIME Highlights • A reduction in all measures of recorded crime; overall, a 24.4% reduction for groups 1 to 4—71 fewer victims of crime.
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY DETECTION RATE Performance alert! • Deterioration in the detection rate for groups 1 to 4 from 35.1 to 27.7% • Deterioration in the detection rate for vandalism from 34.3% to 24.0%
Inspector Adrian Robertson said: ‘It was pleasing to see that as we entered 2013, the levels of all recorded crime types in the Arbroath area had dropped significantly. An overall reduction of 16.9% equated to 149 less victims of crime in the community which was extremely positive.
STANDARDS OF SERVICE Highlights • Best results across LPA for measures relating to updating the public and overall customer experience
Much of this reduction was achieved through proactive patrolling, deploying dedicating resources to hot spot crime areas and targeting known offenders. Community Officers also contributed significantly by
22
Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April to December 2012
PUBLIC PERCEPTION Highlights • 10.2% of residents said they were concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood, a significant 21.3 percentage point improvement on the 31.5% recorded at the same time last year.
SAFER COMMUNITIES December Update TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY Sergeant Fergus Storrier said: ‘Community Safety and Community Officers worked with partners in Angus to support the Focus on Alcohol Angus Festive Campaign. Innovative approaches including messages being projected onto buildings at key events as well as the use of social media allowed the message to be spread to a wider section of the Angus Community. In addition Community Officers attended partnerships displays at local supermarkets to provide a safe drinking message. Continued support by the Road Safety Officer was given to the Winter Road Safety Campaign with S5/ S6 pupils at schools being given Safe Driving messages through Driving Ambition. Friday Night Projects in Angus continued to run up to the Christmas School break with Community Officers from Angus working in partnership with other statutory and third sector partners in areas such as Arbroath, Monifieth, Carnoustie, Birkhill, Montrose, and Kirriemuir. These projects have supported a wide reduction in youths causing annoyance calls across Angus and are widely used by hundreds of young people every week.
23
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: LOCAL POLICING AREA SCORECARD APRIL 2012 - DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin
SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir
POLICING ANGUS
SECTION 3 Arbroath
SECTION 4 Carnoustie
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% / pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% /pp Change
Groups 1-4
2454
2388
2.8%
863
680
26.9%
640
537
19.2%
731
880
-16.9%
220
291
-24.4%
- Detection rate
43.0%
45.4%
-2.3
42.2%
40.6%
1.6
44.1%
47.9%
-3.8
47.7%
50.9%
-3.2
27.7%
35.1%
-7.3
59
75
-21.3%
24
16
50.0%
12
11
9.1%
19
36
-47.2%
4
12
-66.7%
- Detection rate
93.2%
85.3%
7.9
100.0%
68.8%
31.3
91.7%
100.0%
-8.3
84.2%
91.7%
-7.5
100.0%
75.0%
25.0
Indecency (G2)
72
90
-20.0%
21
20
5.0%
22
17
29.4%
22
42
-47.6%
7
11
-36.4%
- Detection rate
86.1%
67.8%
18.3
71.4%
80.0%
-8.6
100.0%
76.5%
23.5
72.7%
64.3%
8.4
128.6%
45.5%
83.1
Dishonesty (G3)
1403
1322
6.1%
532
403
32.0%
325
297
9.4%
441
495
-10.9%
105
127
-17.3%
- Detection rate
46.3%
50.3%
-4.0
43.2%
44.2%
-0.9
51.1%
55.2%
-4.1
52.4%
57.4%
-5.0
21.0%
30.7%
-9.8
920
901
2.1%
286
241
18.7%
281
212
32.5%
249
307
-18.9%
104
141
-26.2%
31.5%
32.5%
-1.0
33.2%
29.5%
3.8
29.5%
32.5%
-3.0
34.5%
33.9%
0.7
25.0%
34.8%
-9.8
11
9
22.2%
5
1
400.0%
1
1
0.0%
4
5
-20.0%
1
2
-50.0%
81.8%
66.7%
15.2
80.0%
0.0%
80.0
100.0%
100.0%
0.0
75.0%
80.0%
-5.0
100.0%
50.0%
50.0
869
861
0.9%
267
232
15.1%
265
195
35.9%
241
294
-18.0%
96
140
-31.4%
30.6%
30.8%
-0.2
33.7%
28.0%
5.7
27.5%
29.2%
-1.7
33.2%
32.3%
0.9
24.0%
34.3%
-10.3
69
75
-8.0%
29
31
-6.5%
19
20
-5.0%
15
17
-11.8%
6
7
-14.3%
40.6%
38.7%
1.9
37.9%
38.7%
-0.8
42.1%
35.0%
7.1
46.7%
47.1%
-0.4
33.3%
28.6%
4.8
Violent Crime (G1)
24
Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4) - Detection rate Robbery - Detection rate Vandalism - Detection rate Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate
Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.
POLICING ANGUS
CRIME
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: ANGUS LPA SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL to DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir
POLICING ANGUS
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
0.8
94.4%
89.7%
4.7
98.6% 89.7%
8.9*
91.2%
94.9%
-3.7
77.8%
91.4% -13.6
87.5%
92.3%
-4.8
80.0% 75.6%
4.4
84.8%
80.0%
4.8
Updating the Public: Overall % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry
65.0%
69.5% 59.7%
9.8*
56.6%
60.9%
-4.3
65.3%
46.2%
19.1*
71.2% 69.1%
2.1
85.7%
63.2%
22.5*
% of customers who received an update following their contact to report a crime
84.9% 73.3%
11.6
69.6%
73.9%
-4.3
81.3%
66.7%
14.6
88.6% 81.3%
7.3
94.4%
68.4%
26.0
% of customers who received an update following their contact for reasons other than to report a crime
46.4% 44.4%
2.0
46.7%
47.8%
-1.1
35.3%
24.0%
11.3
45.8% 52.2%
-6.4
61.5%
57.9%
3.6
87.3% 83.0%
4.3
80.9%
80.0%
0.9
79.7%
81.0%
-1.3
94.6% 88.5%
6.1
92.8%
81.4%
11.4
257/756 (34.0%)
64/191 (33.5%)
60/196 (30.6%)
76/232 (32.8%)
57/137 (41.6%)
Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the very small subsample sizes. First Contact
- An improvement in satisfaction with service at first contact from 91.8% to 95.1%. This result exceeds the force target set at 94.0%. - A reduction in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 84.3% to 82.1%. Updating the Public
- A statistically significant 9.8 percentage point improvement in updating the public from 59.7% to 69.5%, the highest result across the force. This result again exceeds the force target set at 65.0%. When analysed by reason for contact - 84.9% of those who reported a crime were updated compared to 73.3% the previous year. A further improvement was also evident in relation to those whose contact was for reasons other than to report a crime whereby 46.4% received an update compared to 44.4% in 2011. Customer Experience
- Improvement in overall customer experience from 83.0% to 87.3%, the highest result across the force.
POLICING ANGUS
2012-13 Result
25
%/pp Change
-2.2
2011-12 Result
82.1% 84.3%
2012-13 Result
85.0%
Response Rate
%/pp Change
First Contact: % of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry
85.0%
2011-12 Result
2011-12 Result
94.3%
SECTION 4 Carnoustie
2012-13 Result
2012-13 Result
95.1%
SECTION 3 Arbroath
%/pp Change
% / pp Change
3.3
rating of the service provided by Tayside Police
2011-12 Result
95.1% 91.8%
Customer Experience: Overall satisfaction
2012-13 Result
94.0%
(*denotes a statistically significant change in results)
2012-13 Target
First Contact: Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact
Customer Satisfaction
SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin
ANGUS LPA SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION ~ APRIL - DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir
POLICING ANGUS
SECTION 4 Carnoustie
SECTION 3 Arbroath
SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
88.7%
4.3
98.5%
98.1%
0.4
92.4%
83.6%
8.8
86.3%
70.9%
15.4*
87.6%
74.2%
13.4
84.0%
73.2%
10.8
84.4%
59.5%
24.9*
‌During the day
95.7%
96.6%
-0.9
95.2%
96.1%
-0.9
95.4%
98.2%
-2.8
94.1%
92.6%
‌After dark
66.3%
65.1%
1.2
71.0%
57.7%
13.3
57.6%
64.8%
-7.2
58.9%
21.4%
34.0%
-12.6*
23.8%
29.8%
-6.0
28.6%
19.2%
9.4
Police Visibility % of residents who perceived 59.0% that Tayside Police performed 'very' or 'fairly' well at providing a visible presence
48.7%
10.3*
54.8%
50.0%
4.8
60.0%
53.3%
6.7
26
100.0% 100.0%
0.0
90.8%
76.5%
14.3
1.5
98.0%
98.7%
-0.7
55.8%
3.1
83.3%
77.1%
6.2
21.2%
55.6%
-34.3*
10.2%
31.5%
-21.3*
54.4%
39.0%
15.4
65.3%
50.8%
14.5
Feelings of safety % of residents who felt safe walking alone in neighbourhood
Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood
Speeding (20.1%)
Top 3 issues that cause most Drug dealing/drug abuse (17.4%) concern in neighbourhoods Youths causing annoyance (12.8%)
Response Rate
215/756 (28.4%)
Drug dealing/drug abuse (28.6%) Speeding (17.9%) Youths causing annoyance (10.7%)
43/171 (25.2%)
Speeding (24.5%) Drug dealing/drug abuse (16.3%) Youths causing annoyance (14.3%)
67/180 (37.2%)
Drug dealing/drug abuse (23.7%) Speeding (13.2%) Youths causing annoyance (13.2%)
53/207 (25.6%)
Speeding (23.5%) Youths causing annoyance (11.8%) Antisocial behaviour (8.8%) Dangerous driving (8.8%)
52/198 (26.3%)
POLICING ANGUS
2012-13 93.0%
Change
Change 2.9
Neighbourhood as a safe place to live % of residents who rated their neighbourhood as a safe place to live Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year
2011-12
2011-12 93.3%
(*denotes a statistically significant change in results)
2012-13
2012-13 96.2%
Public Perception
POLICING ANGUS: Crime in more detail PERIOD APR to DEC CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2011/2012 Made known
December Alone
2012/2013
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
GROUP 1 ~ Crimes of Violence Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others GROUP 1 - TOTAL
3 6 0 35 9 15 0 3 4 0
2 6 0 30 6 15 0 3 2 0
66.7% 100.0% 85.7% 66.7% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -
0 8 0 24 11 10 0 4 2 0
0 8 0 21 9 11 0 4 2 0
100.0% 87.5% 81.8% 110.0% 100.0% 100.0% -
-3 2 0 -11 2 -5 0 1 -2 0
-100.0% 33.3% -31.4% 22.2% -33.3% 33.3% -50.0% -
0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
100.0% 100.0% -
75
64
85.3%
59
55
93.2%
-16
-21.3%
5
5 100.0%
14 0 60 7 8 1
11 0 40 5 4 1
78.6% 66.7% 71.4% 50.0% 100.0%
10 1 49 2 6 4
4 1 46 7 2 2
40.0% 100.0% 93.9% 350.0% 33.3% 50.0%
-4 1 -11 -5 -2 3
-28.6% -18.3% -71.4% -25.0% 300.0%
0 0 7 0 1 1
0 0 9 1 0 0
90
61
67.8%
72
62
86.1%
-18
-20.0%
9
75 35 56 27 29 41 0 26 916 50 3 2 60 2
29 6 15 9 3 27 0 22 499 14 3 3 33 2
38.7% 17.1% 26.8% 33.3% 10.3% 65.9% 84.6% 54.5% 28.0% 100.0% 150.0% 55.0% 100.0%
69 51 78 42 25 30 0 8 883 50 7 3 98 59
28 5 14 6 8 21 0 7 476 9 7 0 40 28
40.6% 9.8% 17.9% 14.3% 32.0% 70.0% 87.5% 53.9% 18.0% 100.0% 0.0% 40.8% 47.5%
-6 -8.0% 16 45.7% 22 39.3% 15 55.6% -4 -13.8% -11 -26.8% 0 -18 -69.2% -33 -3.6% 0 0.0% 4 133.3% 1 50.0% 38 63.3% 57 2850.0%
4 5 9 6 2 1 0 0 93 12 0 0 16 6
3 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 48 6 0 0 3 3
75.0% 20.0% 11.1% 16.7% 0.0% 100.0% 51.6% 50.0% 18.8% 50.0%
1322
665
50.3%
1403
649
46.3%
81
6.1%
154
67
43.5%
18 861 22
8 265 20
44.4% 30.8% 90.9%
25 869 26
8 266 16
32.0% 30.6% 61.5%
7 8 4
38.9% 0.9% 18.2%
3 100 2
1 32 2
33.3% 32.0% 100.0%
901
293
32.5%
920
290
31.5%
19
2.1%
105
35
33.3%
2388
1083
45.4%
2454
1056
43.0%
66
2.8%
273
117
42.9%
13 2 66 8 1 128 40 28 217 9 13
14 2 66 8 1 128 40 29 220 8 11
107.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 103.6% 101.4% 88.9% 84.6%
13 2 52 15 1 127 35 25 231 11 24
13 2 52 14 1 126 35 25 231 11 20
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.3% 100.0% 99.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.3%
0 0 -14 7 0 -1 -5 -3 14 2 11
0.0% 0.0% -21.2% 87.5% 0.0% -0.8% -12.5% -10.7% 6.5% 22.2% 84.6%
0 0 7 1 0 7 2 1 20 2 3
0 0 7 1 0 7 1 1 20 2 3
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
525
527 100.4%
536
530
98.9%
11
2.1%
43
42
97.7%
2990
1586
53.0%
77
2.6%
316
159
50.3%
GROUP 2 ~ Crimes of Indecency Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
128.6% 0.0% 0.0%
10 111.1%
GROUP 3 ~ Crimes of Dishonesty Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 ~ Malicious Mischief, vandalism etc. Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
GROUP 5 ~ Other crimes Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
2913
1610
55.3%
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
27
Policing Perth & Kinross: Community Summaries ~ April to December 2012 SECTION 3: PERTH CITY
SECTION 5: EAST PERTHSHIRE
Main areas of public concern: vandalism/graffiti, speeding & youths causing annoyance
Main areas of public concern: speeding, housebreaking, youths causing annoyance
CRIME Highlights • Reduction of 16.2% for domestic housebreaking (12 fewer crimes)
CRIME Highlights • Best reduction in LPA for groups 1 to 4 of 19.6% (107fewer crimes) • Vandalism down by 20.6% (33 fewer crimes)
DETECTION RATE Performance alert! • Deteriorations in all detection rates including a 12.9 percentage point drop in detection rate for crimes of dishonesty from 61.1% to 48.2%
DETECTION RATE Performance alert! • Fall in detection rate for Groups 1 to 4 from 44.8% to 36.6%
STANDARDS OF SERVICE Performance Alert • A significant 16.5 percentage point fall in people who received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 61.4% to 44.9%
STANDARDS OF SERVICE Highlights • 88.5% of East Perthshire customers surveyed stated they received an update following their contact to report a crime - best result across LPA
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY PUBLIC PERCEPTION Highlights • 100% of customers surveyed said they felt safe walking alone in the neighbourhood during the day—best result across LPA
Inspector Ian Martin said: ‘The results posted show that Perth Section had a challenging period but responded well. One of the biggest improvements was in the reduction of the number of private houses that were broken into. This crime has a significant impact on families and a reduction like this is reassuring. This reduction combined with an increase in the detection rate showed that nearly one in two crimes of this nature were detected.
SECTION 6: SOUTH PERTHSHIRE Main areas of public concern: speeding, drug dealing/abuse and housebreaking
We continued to target volume crimes such as vandalism that can affect our community and it is pleasing to see the continuing fall in numbers recorded. Reductions in vandalism etc. have a huge impact on the well being of a community and cannot be underestimated.
CRIME Highlights • Reduction of 34.6% for domestic housebreaking (9 fewer crimes) DETECTION RATE Performance alert! • Fall in detection rate for Groups 1 to 4 from 43.7% to 31.6% over a similar number of crimes recorded • Fall in detection rate for crimes of dishonesty from 47.3% to 24.8% • Deterioration in the detection rate for housebreaking from 38.5% to 11.8%
Going forward, our challenges include the need to provide a first class service to the public and we need to ensure that the slight drop shown in some of the satisfaction categories are reversed and that we maintain the highest standards. The public perception relating to improvements in neighbourhoods and the visibility of officers are pleasing to note.’
STANDARDS OF SERVICE (* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
28
Policing Perth & Kinross: Community Summaries ~ April to December 2012 Performance Alert • A 33.2 percentage point improvement in customers who received an update following their contact other than to report a crime from 33.2% to 71.4%
Highlights • 92.3% of customers surveyed stated that, overall they were satisfied with the service provided—best result across LPA
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY
TARGETED COMMUNITY ACTIVITY
Inspector Iain Ward said: ‘The latest monthly results when viewed in conjunction with the overall performance of the section throughout the year demonstrate a solid commitment by police officers and police staff to provide a quality service from initial point of contact through to updates upon conclusion.
Inspector Julie Robertson said: ‘North and West Perthshire continues to be a low crime area therefore I would again highlight caution when interpreting percentage crime increases which can appear dramatic when we are dealing with such a small number of crimes. Although I was pleased to see an increase in our detection rate for Housebreakings, which improved to 66.7%, we cannot become complacent and I ensure section supervisors review these crimes to ensure we take every available opportunity to detect them.
I was particularly impressed with the decrease in the number of Housebreakings compared to the same period last year. An operation to combat such crimes was live during this period which had a positive impact on the figures. In addition, a positive media campaign including a TV interview had a beneficial effect on the public perception of the police.
Although group 1 – 4 crimes show a significant increase of 50% this is due mainly to the rise in group 2 and 3 crimes, (indecencies – many of which were historical, and dishonesties). Although we improved detection rates for these crimes, 85% and 41.5% respectively (a substantial increase yet again from the previous month), this consequently impacted on the overall detection rates for Group 1 – 4 crimes from 37.4 % to 43.7%.
It is noted that there was a drop in detection rates; a thorough crime review in the section is about to be undertaken in order to identify opportunities to improve upon these figures prior to the end of the year. There still remains a large amount of work to be done prior to the end of Tayside Police with a commitment from the section to maintain the high standards which the public currently receive when the Police Service of Scotland begins in April.’
SECTION 7: PERTHSHIRE
NORTH
AND
I was also very pleased to see officers continued to focus on providing a good quality of service to the public which was reflected in the excellent overall satisfaction rating of 92.3%, given by our customers.’
WEST
Main areas of public concern: speeding, housebreaking drug dealing/drug abuse & youths causing annoyance CRIME Performance alert! • Increase of 50.0% in Groups 1 to 4 from 174 to 261 DETECTION RATE Highlights • Improvement in the detection rate for housebreaking from 20.0% to 66.7% STANDARDS OF SERVICE (* Results should be viewed in conjunction with sample size. Changes in results may appear inflated due to the small number of respondents involved.)
29
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: LOCAL POLICING AREA SCORECARD APRIL 2012 - DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 3 Perth City
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
SECTION 5 East Perthshire
SECTION 6 South Perthshire
SECTION 7 North and West Perthshire
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
% / pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
Groups 1-4
3043
3058
-0.5%
1718
1706
0.7%
440
547
-19.6%
624
631
-1.1%
261
174
50.0%
- Detection rate
41.5%
50.4%
-8.9
46.1%
56.0%
-9.9
36.6%
44.8%
-8.2
31.6%
43.7%
-12.2
43.7%
37.4%
6.3
112
112
0.0%
80
76
5.3%
15
16
-6.3%
13
14
-7.1%
4
6
-33.3%
- Detection rate
83.9%
92.9%
-8.9
86.3%
96.1%
-9.8
80.0%
87.5%
-7.5
69.2%
78.6%
-9.3
100.0%
100.0%
0.0
Indecency (G2)
115
82
40.2%
48
29
65.5%
16
30
-46.7%
31
21
47.6%
20
2
900.0%
- Detection rate
76.5%
61.0%
15.5
56.3%
72.4%
-16.2
118.8%
53.3%
65.4
80.6%
57.1%
23.5
85.0%
50.0%
35.0
Dishonesty (G3)
2045
2045
0.0%
1165
1149
1.4%
269
329
-18.2%
435
444
-2.0%
176
123
43.1%
- Detection rate
40.3%
53.7%
-13.3
48.2%
61.1%
-12.9
30.9%
44.1%
-13.2
24.8%
47.3%
-22.5
41.5%
33.3%
8.1
771
819
-5.9%
425
452
-6.0%
140
172
-18.6%
145
152
-4.6%
61
43
41.9%
33.3%
35.3%
-2.0
31.8%
35.2%
-3.4
33.6%
40.7%
-7.1
37.9%
28.3%
9.6
32.8%
39.5%
-6.7
35
26
34.6%
31
24
29.2%
2
0
***
2
2
0.0%
0
0
***
77.1%
88.5%
-11.3
80.6%
91.7%
-11.0
50.0%
0.0%
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
0.0
0.0%
0.0%
0.0
704
746
-5.6%
390
416
-6.3%
127
160
-20.6%
133
129
3.1%
54
41
31.7%
31.7%
34.6%
-2.9
31.3%
33.9%
-2.6
32.3%
40.6%
-8.3
33.1%
28.7%
4.4
29.6%
36.6%
-7.0
130
124
4.8%
62
74
-16.2%
18
19
-5.3%
17
26
-34.6%
33
5
560.0%
42.3%
38.7%
3.6
37.1%
39.2%
-2.1
44.4%
42.1%
2
11.8%
38.5%
-26.7
66.7%
20.0%
46.7
Violent Crime (G1)
30 Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4) - Detection rate Robbery - Detection rate Vandalism - Detection rate Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate
Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
CRIME
KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: PERTH & KINROSS LPA SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL to DECEMBER 2012 POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
SECTION 3 Perth City
SECTION 5 East Perthshire
SECTION 6 South Perthshire
SECTION 7 North & West Perthshire
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
2012-13 Result
2011-12 Result
%/pp Change
94.1%
97.4%
-3.3*
91.0%
97.4%
-6.4
96.9%
98.5%
-1.6
94.8%
95.4%
-0.6
93.8% 100.0%
-6.2
First Contact: % of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry
85.0%
87.0%
88.9%
-1.9
84.6%
90.1%
-5.5
88.4%
90.2%
-1.8
89.0%
89.1%
-0.1
85.0%
80.0%
5.0
65.0%
65.5%
64.8%
0.7
44.9%
61.4% -16.5*
72.0%
69.5%
2.5
72.9%
64.3%
8.6
74.6%
73.9%
0.7
% of customers who received an update following their contact to report a crime
81.3%
74.9%
6.4
80.6%
69.0%
11.6
88.5%
75.0%
13.5
73.3%
82.0%
-8.7
86.7%
80.0%
6.7
% of customers who received an update following their contact for reasons other than to report a crime
40.2%
50.8%
-10.6
25.9%
51.8%
-25.9
43.3%
57.9%
-14.6
71.4%
38.2%
33.2
44.4%
69.2%
-24.8
81.7%
85.2%
-3.5
70.8%
85.9% -15.1*
83.0%
86.4%
-3.4
85.7%
83.8%
1.9
92.3%
83.4%
8.9
Updating the Public: Overall % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry
31
Customer Experience: Overall satisfaction 85.0% rating of the service provided by Tayside Police Response Rate
390/972 (40.1%)
116/316 (36.7%)
100/234 (42.7%)
108/283 (38.2%)
66/139 (47.5%)
Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the very small sub-sample sizes. First Contact - A statistically significant reduction in satisfaction with service at first contact from 97.4% to 94.1%. This result achieves the force target set at 94.0%. - Reduction in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 88.9% to 87.0%. Updating the Public - Improvement of 0.7 percentage points in updating the public rising from 64.8% to 65.5%. This result exceeds the force target set at 65.0%. When analysed by reason for contact - 81.3% of those who reported a crime were updated compared to 74.9% the previous year. Conversely, a reduction was evident in relation to those whose contact was for reasons other than to report a crime whereby 40.2% received an update compared to 50.8% in 2011. Customer Experience - Reduction in overall customer experience from 85.2% to 81.7%.
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
% / pp Change
%/pp Change
2011-12 Result
2011-12 Result
2012-13 Result
94.0%
(*denotes a statistically significant change in results)
2012-13 Result
2012-13 Target
First Contact: Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact
Customer Satisfaction
PERTH & KINROSS LPA SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION ~ APRIL - DECEMBER 2012 SECTION 7 North & West Perthshire
SECTION 6 South Perthshire
SECTION 5 East Perthshire
SECTION 3 Perth City
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS 2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
2012-13
2011-12
Change
94.7%
-2.1
89.4%
87.5%
1.9
95.9%
97.8%
-1.9
91.4%
96.5%
-5.1
95.3%
100.0%
-4.7
77.6%
71.8%
5.8
76.7%
70.1%
6.6
80.7%
76.7%
4.0
72.8%
68.2%
4.6
84.5%
76.9%
7.6
‌During the day
96.2%
97.0%
-0.8
93.9%
93.8%
0.1
100.0%
98.9%
1.1
95.8%
97.3%
-1.5
95.4%
100.0%
-4.6
‌After dark
63.1%
71.4%
-8.3*
56.0%
59.4%
-3.4
64.3%
72.4%
-8.1
67.1%
79.1%
-12.0
66.6%
78.2%
-11.6
28.9%
27.9%
1.0
38.8%
29.1%
9.7
28.1%
31.8%
-3.7
25.5%
28.6%
-3.1
19.1%
11.8%
7.3
Police Visibility % of residents who perceived 53.9% that Tayside Police performed 'very' or 'fairly' well at providing a visible presence
44.3%
9.6*
54.4%
40.6%
13.8
55.6%
44.4%
11.2
51.2%
50.0%
1.2
55.5%
34.6%
20.9
(*denotes a statistically significant change in results)
Neighbourhood as a safe place to live % of residents who rated their neighbourhood as a safe place to live Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year
32
Feelings of safety % of residents who felt safe walking alone in neighbourhood
Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood
Speeding (19.9%) Housebreaking (11.9%)
Top 3 issues that cause most Vandalism/graffiti (10.0%) concern in neighbourhoods Youths causing annoyance (10.0%)
Response Rate
298/972 (30.6%)
Vandalism/graffiti (20.0%) Speeding (10.9%) Youths causing annoyance (10.9%)
Speeding (30.2%) Housebreaking (17.0%) Youths causing annoyance (11.3%)
85/297 (28.6%)
75/234 (32.1%)
Speeding (19.7%) Drug dealing/drug abuse (12.1%) Housebreaking (10.6%)
95/297 (32.0%)
Speeding (18.5%) Housebreaking (14.8%) Drug dealing/drug abuse (11.1%) Youths causing annoyance (11.1%)
43/144 (29.9%)
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS
2012-13 92.6%
Public Perception
POLICING PERTH & KINROSS: Crime in more detail PERIOD APR to DEC CRIME CLASSIFICATION
2011/2012 Made known
December Alone
2012/2013
DETECTIONS number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
INC./DEC. number %
Made known
DETECTIONS number %
GROUP 1 ~ Crimes of Violence Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others
4 24 0 34 26 19 0 1 4 0
4 23 0 30 23 19 0 1 4 0
100.0% 95.8% 88.2% 88.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -
1 8 0 40 35 16 0 7 5 0
2 8 0 31 27 16 0 6 4 0
200.0% 100.0% 77.5% 77.1% 100.0% 85.7% 80.0% -
-3 -16 0 6 9 -3 0 6 1 0
-75.0% -66.7% 17.6% 34.6% -15.8% 600.0% 25.0% -
1 2 0 6 4 4 0 4 0 0
1 2 0 4 1 4 0 3 0 0
100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 25.0% 100.0% 75.0% -
112
104
92.9%
112
94
83.9%
0
0.0%
21
15
71.4%
10 1 43 9 13 6
9 1 29 1 5 5
90.0% 100.0% 67.4% 11.1% 38.5% 83.3%
29 3 52 6 11 14
17 3 36 14 10 8
58.6% 100.0% 69.2% 233.3% 90.9% 57.1%
19 2 9 -3 -2 8
190.0% 200.0% 20.9% -33.3% -15.4% 133.3%
5 0 5 0 0 0
1 0 5 0 0 0
20.0% 100.0% -
82
50
61.0%
115
88
76.5%
33
40.2%
10
6
60.0%
124 50 85 52 95 67 2 66 1248 86 15 6 130 19
48 7 49 15 38 38 2 48 680 47 15 6 98 7
38.7% 14.0% 57.6% 28.8% 40.0% 56.7% 100.0% 72.7% 54.5% 54.7% 100.0% 100.0% 75.4% 36.8%
130 64 82 78 81 55 3 39 1209 85 6 2 170 41
55 12 28 14 35 22 3 28 515 8 6 1 84 14
42.3% 18.8% 34.1% 17.9% 43.2% 40.0% 100.0% 71.8% 42.6% 9.4% 100.0% 50.0% 49.4% 34.1%
6 14 -3 26 -14 -12 1 -27 -39 -1 -9 -4 40 22
4.8% 28.0% -3.5% 50.0% -14.7% -17.9% 50.0% -40.9% -3.1% -1.2% -60.0% -66.7% 30.8% 115.8%
18 17 16 11 5 10 1 5 140 5 0 2 23 14
4 0 2 0 2 3 1 5 68 0 0 1 11 5
22.2% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 40.0% 30.0% 100.0% 100.0% 48.6% 0.0% 50.0% 47.8% 35.7%
2045
1098
53.7%
2045
825
40.3%
0
0.0%
267
102
38.2%
46 746 27
12 258 19
26.1% 34.6% 70.4%
37 704 30
16 223 18
43.2% 31.7% 60.0%
-9 -42 3
-19.6% -5.6% 11.1%
2 89 1
1 22 2
50.0% 24.7% 200.0%
819
289
35.3%
771
257
33.3%
-48
-5.9%
92
25
27.2%
3058
1541
50.4%
3043
1264
41.5%
-15
-0.5%
390
148
37.9%
16 4 62 26 0 146 61 55 700 14 16
15 4 63 25 0 146 59 53 701 15 13
93.8% 100.0% 101.6% 96.2% 100.0% 96.7% 96.4% 100.1% 107.1% 81.3%
18 6 67 14 1 124 51 40 576 13 7
18 6 67 15 1 120 47 38 575 13 7
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 107.1% 100.0% 96.8% 92.2% 95.0% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0%
2 2 5 -12 1 -22 -10 -15 -124 -1 -9
12.5% 50.0% 8.1% -46.2% -15.1% -16.4% -27.3% -17.7% -7.1% -56.3%
1 1 4 4 1 14 9 0 22 1 1
1 1 4 4 1 12 7 0 23 1 1
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% 77.8% 104.5% 100.0% 100.0%
GROUP 5 - TOTAL
1100
1094
99.5%
917
907
98.9%
-183
-16.6%
58
55
94.8%
TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5
4158
2635
63.4%
3960
2171
54.8%
-198
-4.8%
448
203
45.3%
GROUP 1 - TOTAL
GROUP 2 ~ Crimes of Indecency Rape Assault with intent to ravish Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL
GROUP 3 ~ Crimes of Dishonesty Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL
GROUP 4 ~ Malicious Mischief, vandalism etc. Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL
SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4
GROUP 5 ~ Other crimes Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others
Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.
33
34
PUBLIC PROTECTION
P
ublic Protection is the foremost aim of Tayside Police and protecting the public from harm by working with partners is the basis of the Community Priorities. The force is committed to providing this protection to all members of the community. Contained within this section is information pertaining to some specific areas of Public Protection to which the force dedicates considerable resources which include highly specialised police officers and staff. These dedicated members of the force constantly strive to ensure the most vulnerable in our society are protected and can live their lives free from harm.
35
PUBLIC PROTECTION Tayside Police uses its crime recording system to manage information gathered by operational police officers in respect of all facets of the Public Protection portfolio, including Domestic Abuse, Child Protection and Vulnerable Adult Protection.
In addition to working with our partners, when a crime has also been committed, Tayside Police will carry out a thorough investigation and, where there is a sufficiency of evidence, the perpetrator will be reported to the Procurator Fiscal.
Where substantive crimes are being investigated, reports will have relevant markers added to them which allows officers and staff from support functions and specialist teams to search and identify relevant records.
The graph below illustrates that during the first five months of 2012/13, the number of Domestic Abuse incidents recorded each month was higher than the number recorded at the same time last year. This trend was reversed from September to December as there were fewer Domestic incidents during those months than there was in the previous year, with the exception of November 2012.
Where no substantive crimes are being investigated, the system allows officers to file CONCERN reports which, as the title suggests, allows officers to record any anxiety they have regarding a situation they have either attended or witnessed during the course of their duties. These domestic, child and adult concern reports are, in due course, assessed by specialist departments and, where appropriate, information is shared with partner agencies under Information Sharing Protocols.
T aysid e ~ D o mest ic A b use Inci d ent s
2011-12
2012-13
500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50
Domestic Abuse
0 Apr
Tayside Police respond to many instances of a domestic nature throughout the course of a year. All domestic abuse incidents are recorded to ensure an appropriate response is initiated.
M ay
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
M ar
Taking all months into consideration, at the end of December 2012 the total of 3759 incidents was 6.5% higher than the 3530 incidents reported at the end of December last year.
By recording all incidents of domestic abuse, Tayside Police can, in the first instance, assess risk to those who are subjected to the abuse and the impact on any children involved. Secondly, they can put protective measures in place, and lastly, target repeat offenders.
Of the 3759 incidents reported this year, 1704 involved one or more substantiated crime and the remaining 2055 were the subject of a Domestic Concern Report. Looking at the incidents which resulted in one or more substantiated crime, 639 (37.5%) involved a “repeat” victim. Last year at the end of December this figure was 37.7%.
Domestic abuse is not a crime in itself and can be either one form of, or a combination of, non-criminal behaviour or criminal behaviour. Examples of noncriminal behaviour would be isolation, withholding money and psychological abuse etc which can have a substantial impact on a person’s health and wellbeing and that of their children. Examples of criminal behaviour would be assaults, vandalism, threatening or abusive behaviour, fire-raising etc.
Where a crime was recorded, 1053 perpetrators of domestic abuse were reported to the Procurator Fiscal (61.8%). This was an improvement on the 56.9% of perpetrators reported to the Procurator Fiscal at the same time last year.
When domestic abuse is reported to the police we will work in partnership with specialist agencies including Barnardos, Women’s Aid and the Violence against Women partnerships to ensure that those at risk from abuse, and their families, are given appropriate support and advice which will enable them to make an informed decision about their future.
In 31.4% of all incidents (those involving one or more substantive crime and those warranting a domestic concern report) alcohol was a contributory factor. Last year this figure was lower at 23.2%.
36
PUBLIC PROTECTION The following chart illustrates the comparisons month by month and shows that in the second half of 201112 the prevalence of alcohol was much greater than in the earlier part of the year. Tayside ~ Dom estic Abuse Incidents involving alcohol
2011-12
180
2012-13
Child Concern Reports Throughout Tayside, between April and the end of December 2011 there were 6739 child concern reports recorded. This equated to 99 per 1,000 children under 16 population. The commensurate figure this year was 6545 (95 per 1,000 children under 16 population), 2.9% fewer.
160 140 120
The following table shows the divisional distribution in 2012 with 3201 recorded in Dundee, 1614 in Angus and 1730 in Perth & Kinross. The highest number recorded per 1,000 population of children was in Dundee at 133.
100 80 60 40 20 0 Apr May
Jun
Jul
Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec
Jan Feb Mar
Tayside Child Concern Reports per 10,000 pop
Dundee
Angus
P&K
30 25
Adult Concern Reports
20
Throughout Tayside, between April and the end of December 2012 there were 2279 adult concern reports recorded. This equated to 56 per 10,000 population. This figure was a 11.1% increase on the 2051 reports recorded at the same time last year (51 per 10,000 pop.).
15 10 5 0 Apr
Increases occurred in all three Local Policing Areas. In Dundee there was a 9.9% increase, in Angus a 1.2% increase and in Perth & Kinross a 23.3% increase.
Angus
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
This crime group (referred to as Group 2) involves sexual offences. Some of these crimes have been committed prior to the current reporting period although all offences are recorded at the time they are reported. This can mean that some of the data reported each month could contain historical crimes. In addition, as evidence is discovered during investigations multiple crimes can be detected. As such, the level of crime recorded each month is variable.
In general terms, this was the same pattern as the previous year. Dundee
Jun
Crimes of Indecency
The following chart shows the distribution throughout the Tayside region for the first three-quarters of 2012-13 in terms of numbers of reports per 10,000 population and illustrates that Angus recorded more reports per head of population, followed by Perth & Kinross and the lowest number recorded was in Dundee.
Tayside Adult Concern Reports per 10,000 pop
May
Between April and the end of December 2012 in Dundee, 148 crimes were recorded and a detection rate of 72.3% was achieved. In Angus 72 crimes were recorded together with a detection rate of 86.1% and 115 crimes were recorded in Perth and Kinross where the detection rate was 76.5%. The figures for the whole of Tayside were 335 crimes recorded and 76.7% detected.
P&K
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Source of information: Tayside Police Crime Recording System
Mar
37
PUBLIC PROTECTION Failure to notify police/provide false information
Registered Sex Offenders The list of Registered Sex Offenders is broken down into the number of those in the community and the number of those in custody.
It is a requirement of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 that a Sex Offender must provide to the police, and keep updated, various personal details including change of address and holiday arrangements, if these involve leaving the United Kingdom. Failure to do so results in the person being changed with the offence of ’Failure to notify the police or provide false information’.
Registered Sex Offenders in the community are those who have either completed their prison sentence and have been released into the community or are serving their sentence within the community. These people are required to be monitored as registered sex offenders.
Between April and December 2012, 4 people were charged with this offence, just 1 more than the 3 recorded at the same time last year.
Registered Sex Offenders in custody are those who are currently serving their sentence. The length of time people spend on the sex offenders register will depend on the sentence they received. The number of sex offenders at risk of doing serious harm to another individual (should they commit another crime) is also broken down into those at very high risk, high risk, medium risk, low risk or not assessed.
Drugs Supply of Class A Drugs Tayside
V. High Risk
High risk
Low Risk
Not Assessed
Class A 2012-13
3 Year Average
30
The chart below shows that there were 402 registered Sex Offenders in Tayside as at the end of December 2012. Of these, 327 were living in the community and were mainly assessed as medium (115) or low risk (178) of causing serious harm to another individual. There were however 28 people who were considered a high risk, should they re-offend. There were 14 very high risk offenders in custody and, in adTayside Registered Sex Offenders
2011-12
Class A Drugs Recorded
25 20 15 10 5 0 Apr
Medium Risk
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
The chart below shows the number of crimes involved in the supplying of Class A drugs. This can be actual supply of drugs, possession with intent to supply drugs, importing or manufacturing of drugs, but does not include the charge of possession (for personal use) of drugs.
350 6
300
250 178
200 150
There were 69 crimes recorded to date throughout Tayside, 37.3% fewer than at the same time last year (110). This year, Class A drugs accounted for 30% of crimes relating to the supply etc of all types of drugs compared to 41.5% at the same time last year.
100 115
50 0
28 0 RSOs in the Community
11 15 19 16 14 RSOs in Custody
dition, there were 16 high risk offenders, 19 medium risk and 15 low risk offenders also in custody.
This is a volatile area on which to report. In some months there may appear to be very little activity and then there may be a large number of crimes reported at the one time. The nature of this area of business often involves many months of preparation, surveillance and co-operation with other forces, perhaps leading to a successful operation where several per-
38
PUBLIC PROTECTION Alcohol Related Violent Crime
Racist and Other Hate Crime
Violent Crime includes crimes of Murder, Attempted Murder, Serious Assault, Robbery, Child Cruelty, Threats, Abduction etc. These crimes are all ‘Victim Based’ which means a crime is recorded for each victim of violent crime even if there are multiple victims involved in the same incident.
‘Racist Crime’ includes: racist element
‘Hate Crime’ includes: any crime which has occurred due to the victim being targeted because of their disability, or through a transphobic/transgender or a sectarian/religious nature.
The following graph illustrates the number of crimes where either the offender and/or the victim were under the influence of alcohol per month as part of the total number of violent crimes between April and December this year.
Tayside
All Violent Crime
Between April and December 2012 there were 224 racist crimes recorded, 3 fewer than at the same time last year. There was a slight decrease in the number of hate crimes recorded this year (61), which was down by 14.1% on the 71 recorded during 2011/12.
Alcohol Related Violent Crime
The graph below shows the level of Racist and Other Hate Crime for the year of 2011-12 and April to December this year.
60 50 17
16 16
19
15
18
any crime which has a
40 12
14 30 20
37
40
36
37
39 30
27
Tayside Racist & Other Hate Crimes 40
42
Racist Crime 2012/13
Other Hate Crime 2012/13
Racist Crime 2011/12
Other Hate Crime 2011/12
2 35
10 14
30
0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
0 Jan
0 Feb
0 Mar
25 20 15
Cumulatively, to the end of December 302 violent crimes had been recorded, a 25.4% decrease on the 405 recorded at the same time last year. Of the 302 crimes recorded this year, 43% were alcohol related. The commensurate figure last year was 49%.
10 5 0 Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
The total of alcohol related minor assaults recorded between April and December 2012 was 1426, 6.4% more than the 1340 recorded at the same time last year. At the end of December 2011 the number of alcohol related minor assaults accounted for 43.8% of all minor assaults. During the same period this year the commensurate figure was 43.9%.
Source of Information: Tayside Police Crime Recording System
39
PUBLIC PROTECTION COUNTER TERRORISM UK Threat Levels The Home Office is responsible for announcing the UK threat level at any time and in advising the public when that level changes. There are five levels of threat: ♦
Critical ~ an attack is expected imminently
♦
Severe ~ an attack is likely
♦
Substantial ~ an attack is a strong possibility
♦
Moderate ~ an attack is possible but not likely
♦
Low ~ an attack is unlikely
On 11 July 2011 the Home Secretary announced that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had changed the threat level from international terrorism from severe to substantial. That means there is a strong possibility of a terrorist attack. The current level remains at SUBSTANTIAL. The Home Office PREVENT Strategy was refocussed in 2011 and now contains three objectives: to respond to the ideological challenge of terrorism and the threat from those who promote it; to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism and ensure that they are given appropriate advice and support; and to work with sectors and institutions where there are risks of radicalisation that we need to address.
Tayside In Tayside Police, Special Branch constantly review threat assessments. In addition, Counter Terrorist Security Advisors continue to raise the level of awareness about terrorist related matters within the Force and partner agencies. Between April and December 2012 , 89 Counter Terrorism briefings were delivered across Tayside and a total of 815 non-police personnel were in attendance.
40
RESOURCES AND ASSETS
C
orporate support forms an important role in ensuring that appropriate resources are in place to deliver an efficient and effective service to the public. The challenging economic climate means that robust monitoring and reporting processes are instrumental in ensuring that the force is on track to deliver its objectives within available resources .
At the same time, the Scottish Government has set stretching environmental and energy reduction targets for Scotland. As a major employer in Tayside, Tayside Police is committed to demonstrating its contribution to this aim.
41
RESOURCES and ASSETS HEALTH & SAFETY Violence to Police Officers and Staff down 6%! 52% fewer days lost through accidents and violence! Accidents and Violent Incidents
2012/13 2011/12 Change
Accidents to Police Officers and Staff
91
74
23%
262
278
-6%
353
352
0%
Violent incidents to Police Officers resulting in lost time
5
5
0%
Total number of incidents resulting in lost time
21
15
40%
328
680
-52%
5
10
-50%
Violence to Police Officers and Staff Total
Total number of days lost Incidents reported to the Health & Safety Executive
Road Traffic collisions
5
% of Total 1%
Manual handling
6
Slips, trips and falls Training - in house and at the Scottish Police College
Causation factors
2012/13
2011/12 % of Total
percentage pt diff
9
3%
-1
2%
2
1%
1
25
7%
19
5%
2
15
4%
4
1%
3
155
44%
159
45%
-1
Assaults
57
16%
60
17%
-1
Injuries caused by sharp objects
5
1%
5
1%
0
Injuries during arrests
50
14%
57
16%
-2
Others
35
10%
37
11%
-1
Exposure to violence
Total
352
353
RANDOM DRUG TESTING A programme of testing of both police officers and police staff is carried out. This supports the prevention and management of substance misuse within Tayside Police in order to create and maintain healthy staff and enhance public trust in services delivered by the Force. This programme does not prevent staff reporting concerns about suspected illegal activity by colleagues, which is acted upon.
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Police Officers
Probationers
Police Staff
Special Constables
Monthly Total
Cumulative Total
Positive Results
8 0 8 0 4 9
4 0 4 0 10 3
1 0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
13 0 13 0 14 13
13 13 26 26 40 53
0 0 0 0 0 0
42
RESOURCES and ASSETS SICKNESS ABSENCE Absence Rate POLICE OFFICERS
Community Policing Div 2012 - 13 2011 - 12
Dundee LPA 2012 - 13 2011 - 12
Angus LPA 2012 - 13 2011 - 12
Perth & Kinross LPA 2012 - 13 2011 - 12
Colour Key
Target 4%
Absence Rate POLICE STAFF
On target
Below target
Nov 3.6% 3.9%
Dec 3.7% 3.9%
Community Policing Div
Oct 3.9% 3.1%
Nov 4.0% 3.3%
Dec 4.2% 3.4%
Dundee LPA
Oct 4.3% 5.8%
Nov 4.6% 5.7%
Dec 4.8% 5.5%
Angus LPA
Oct 3.0% 4.5%
Nov 3.1% 4.4%
Dec 3.3% 4.3%
Perth & Kinross LPA
Last 3 months Oct 3.4% 3.9%
2012 - 13 2011 - 12
2012 - 13 2011 - 12
2012 - 13 2011 - 12
2012 - 13 2011 - 12
On target
Below target
Nov 5.3% 3.7%
Dec 5.3% 3.9%
Oct 4.2% 3.5%
Nov 4.8% 3.7%
Dec 4.9% 3.8%
Oct 5.3% 4.5%
Nov 5.7% 5.0%
Dec 5.8% 5.6%
Oct 5.5% 2.5%
Nov 5.4% 2.5%
Dec 5.3% 2.7%
Apr to Dec
Average per person
Last 3 months Oct 5.1% 3.5%
Working Days Lost
Working Days Lost Apr to Dec
Community Policing Div
Colour Key
Target 4%
Ave. per person
Days lost
Community Policing Div
Days lost
Short
2492
Short
Medium
1174
Medium
Long Term
3589
Long Term
2662
1066 778
All Days Lost 2012-13
7255
5.8
All Days Lost 2012-13
4506
8.7
All Days Lost 2011-12
7512
6.1
All Days Lost 2011-12
3528
6.4
Percentage difference
-3%
Percentage difference
28%
Dundee LPA
Days lost
Dundee LPA
Days lost
Short
985
Short
160
Medium
483
Medium
98
Long Term
264
Long Term
1472
All Days Lost 2012-13
2940
6.5
All Days Lost 2012-13
522
7.8
All Days Lost 2011-12
2434
5.4
All Days Lost 2011-12
487
6.4
Percentage difference
21%
Percentage difference
7%
Angus LPA Short Medium
Days lost
Angus LPA
Days lost
543
Short
91
283
Medium
100
Long Term
301
Long Term
1139
All Days Lost 2012-13
1965
7.3
All Days Lost 2012-13
492
9.7
All Days Lost 2011-12
2253
8.4
All Days Lost 2011-12
505
9.5
Percentage difference
-13%
Percentage difference
-3%
Perth & Kinross LPA
Days lost
Perth & Kinross LPA
Days lost
Short
648
Short
Medium
235
Medium
39
Long Term
729
Long Term
379
69
All Days Lost 2012-13
1612
5.1
All Days Lost 2012-13
487
8.6
All Days Lost 2011-12
2116
6.8
All Days Lost 2011-12
270
4.4
Percentage difference
-24%
Percentage difference
80%
43
RESOURCES and ASSETS TOIL AND MODIFIED DUTIES Time off in Lieu (TOIL) In line with Police Regulations, officers are compensated in respect of time spent on duty after normal tour ends or where they have been recalled to duty etc. These additional hours can be taken as payment or accrued as time off in lieu of payment. A record is kept of the number of TOIL hours accrued by officers. The tables below relate to the number of hours accrued throughout Tayside as at 7th January 2013
POLICE OFFICERS Time off in Lieu (TOIL)
No of Hours
No of Officers
Average per Officer
Dundee
13190
474
28
Angus
9883
268
37
Perth & Kinross
11945
323
37
Others
7639
180
42
42,657
1,245
34
Total
Modified Duties Modified duties are defined as temporary, short term rehabilitation duties or working conditions approved to assist an individual’s return to the full extent of their duties following illness or injury by permitting return to work of a less demanding capacity. Modified (Protected) duties are generally those which are pregnancy related. There were 67 officers on modified duties as at 31st December 2012. This accounted for 5.4% of overall police strength. The tables below relate to the number of officers throughout Tayside.
P O L IC E O F F IC E R S M o d i fi e d (L i g h t) D u ti e s
M o d i fi e d (P r o te c te d )
N o o f O f fic e r s
N o o f O f fic e r s
Dundee
17
D undee
4
A ngus
7
A ngus
2
P e rt h & K in ro s s
17
P e rt h & K in ro s s
2
O t h e rs
17
O t h e rs
1
T o ta l
T o ta l
58
44
9
RESOURCES and ASSETS STAFF TRAINING and DEVELOPMENT
COURSES
Last three months 2012/13
Cumulative
Oct
Nov
Dec
Apr to Dec
Number of courses held
103
161
112
978
Maximum student places available
659
910
657
6785
Total number of students attending
625
768
596
6350
Percentage of uptake
95%
84%
91%
94%
Total number of training days delivered
834
1047
732
7398
SATISFACTION To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements
Apr - Dec 994
The pre-course information was … received in sufficient time
94.6%
appropriate and with necessary detail clear and easily understood
96.1% 97.2%
well structured
99.3%
easy to follow delivered effectively
99.5% 99.9%
The content of the course was …
The course itself was … well organised
99.0%
the correct length
93.1%
sufficient for my objectives relevant to my objectives
98.0% 98.2%
Taking everything into consideration, the course met my expectations
45
99.3%
RESOURCES and ASSETS FORCE CONTACT CENTRE
December 2012
TARGET
PUBLIC FEEDBACK ON CUSTOMER SERVICE: FIRST CONTACT
TAYSIDE CALLERS
2012/13
2011/12 Change (pp)
Overall satisfaction rating for time taken to answer the phone - emergency call
93.4%
96.1%
-2.7
Overall satisfaction rating for time taken to answer the phone - non-emergency call
90.1%
92.9%
-2.8
83.7%
85.3%
-1.6
% of respondents who were satisfied that the person dealing with their enquiry was courteous and attentive
98.4%
98.4%
0
% of respondents who were satisfied that the person dealing with their enquiry was knowledgeable
96.3%
96.2%
0.1
% of respondents who were satisfied that the person dealing with their enquiry was able to explain what would happen next
91.6%
93.0%
-1.4
Customer Experience Overall satisfaction rating for treatment at first contact
92.7%
92.9%
-0.2
94.6%
94.0%
0.6
% of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry
Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact
85.0%
94.0%
FORCE COMMUNICATIONS CENTRE - CALL MANAGEMENT:
April to December
EMERGENCY
Dec
2012/13
2011/12
Change
35783
39089
-8.5%
3972
87.9%
86.9%
1.1
87.6%
Average call duration (seconds)
109
n/a
~
n/a
Average number of contacts handled per hour (demand)
n/a
n/a
~
n/a
184437
187281
-1.5%
18310
63.7%
83.2%
-19.5
70.8%
173.0
n/a
~
n/a
n/a
~
n/a
10.1%
5.7%
4.4
8.1%
Number of emergency calls Average speed of answer - emergency calls (%)
<10 secs
(Target 90%)
NON-EMERGENCY Number of non-emergency calls <40 secs
Average speed of answer - non-emergency calls (%) Average call duration (seconds) Average number of contacts handled per hour (demand) Abandoned call rate (%)
Force Contact Centre This year, the Force Contact Centre (FCC) has experienced high levels of staff abstractions through sick leave. Staffing resilience had a negative impact on performance and, in an effort to improve overall resilience, a â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Call Handling to Dispatchâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; training migration plan has been implemented.
46
RESOURCES and ASSETS FLEET ~ DECEMBER 2012 2012/13
2011/12
Percentage Point Change
71.3%
72.3%
-1.0
Accidental
136
157
-13.4%
Body Fluid
13
19
-31.6%
Mis-fuel
1
1
0.0%
Unreported
40
42
-4.8%
Vandalism
9
9
0.0%
199
228
-12.7%
Dundee
51
56
-8.9%
Angus
56
77
-27.3%
Perth & Kinross
51
54
-5.6%
Headquarters Division
41
41
0.0%
199
228
-12.7%
Dundee
763,638.00
790,782.00
-3.4%
Angus
821,529.00
773,180.00
6.3%
1,178,282.00
998,283.00
18.0%
705,460.00
688,770.00
2.4%
3,468,909
3,251,015
6.7%
Dundee
31.2
31.6
-0.4
Angus
31.5
31.2
0.3
Perth & Kinross
34.2
31.8
2.4
Headquarters Division
31.2
30.7
0.5
32.0
31.3
0.7
Budget Position @ (month in arrears) Percentage of total spend
Vehicle Accident Reports
Total
Accidents per Local Policing Area
Total
Fleet Mileage per Local Policing Area
Perth & Kinross Headquarters Division Total
Average Fuel Consumption (mpg) per LPA
Average
47
RESOURCES and ASSETS FINANCE ~ DECEMBER 2012 April to December
2012/13
2011/12
Change (p.p/%)
Invoices processed within 15 days
49%
45%
4
Invoices processed within 30 days
96%
93%
3
Proportion of all payments made by electronic means
93%
91%
2
Invoices issued within 5 working days of receipt of request
99%
98%
1
14
14
0%
Percentage of Payroll errors - related to Pay Section
73%
68%
5
Percentage of Payroll errors - related to provision of information
18%
19%
-1
9%
13%
-4
Working days between period close and distribution of management reports
Percentage of Payroll unavoidable errors - related to advance payment
CARBON FOOTPRINT Carbon Management Plan (CMP)
Our plan to reduce from 6,000 tonnes CO2 (Fiscal Year 08/09 output) to 4,500 tonnes by the end of 2015 is slightly ahead of target at 5,188tonnes (end of FY11 target is 5,354 tonnes). Total CO2 emissions from buildings, waste and transport 7,000 6,057 5,813
6,000
5,579 5,354
5,139
4,932
Emission (tonnes)
5,000
4,733
4,543
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012 Year
Emissions from building and street lights (tonnes) Emissions from waste (tonnes) Target CO2 Emission (tonnes) Reduction
48
2013
2014
2015
Emissions from transport (tonnes) Emissions from water (tonnes)
2016
2017
RESOURCES and ASSETS
49
This document is available on the force intranet and web site. It can be viewed there in large print by increasing the magnification on screen.
You can listen to this document as a PDF file by clicking on the ‘View’, menu, selecting ‘Read out aloud’ and ensuring your volume control is turned up.
Ongoing improvement depends on feedback from contributors and users and we would welcome your views. If you require further information about this report please use the contact below.
WHO TO CONTACT
Performance and Planning Unit 0300 111 2222 Email: performanceandplanning@tayside.pnn.police.uk
www.tayside.police.uk Twitter: @statspolice