November 2011 - Performance Scorecard

Page 1

TAY S I D E P O L I C E

Contents 1 Introduction

NOVEMBER 2011

2 Guidance 4 Policing Tayside Scorecard 6 Policing Dundee Scorecard 11 Policing Angus Scorecard 16 Policing Perth & Kinross Scorecard

Introduction This Scorecard is produced within the first five working days of every month.

COMMUNITY PRIORITIES

It is intended as an early snapshot of local performance results covering force key performance indicators.

VISION AND VALUES

Results are presented down to Section level. A fuller performance report covering a wider range of force performance is available on the force intranet and web site at the beginning of the month following.

STANDARDS OF SERVICE

REVIEW

MANAGE

ENGAGE

RESULTS

RESOURCES

AND LISTEN


GUIDANCE

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

B

ASELINES FOR IMPROVEMENT adopt the methodology used in previous years, incorporating the most recent three years average performance. For some KPIs an adjusted improvement target has been implemented rather than the straight three-year average. This takes account of developing trends or patterns over the last 36 months and alters the target up or down accordingly. Improvement Targets are agreed annually through a process of consultation with divisional commanders and heads of departments. These are ratified through the force Performance Committee. Results are colour-coded against the following criteria: On or above target Below target

E

XTREME CAUTION should be exercised when considering percentage changes from one time period to another, especially at Section-level. Please interpret percentages in conjunction with actual numbers of crimes involved.

2


POLICING TAYSIDE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SCORECARDS COVERING FORCE, DIVISIONS AND SECTIONS

Tayside Land Area: 2,896 square miles Population: 399,550 Police Officers: 1231 Police Staff: 505 Special Constables: 169

3


KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS SCORECARD APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011 POLICING TAYSIDE

POLICING DUNDEE

POLICING ANGUS

POLICING PERTH & KINROSS

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2.9

91.5%

91.3%

92.2%

-0.9

91.5% 98.0%

90.7%

7.3

First Contact:% of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry

80.0% 84.7% 82.3%

2.4

80.0% 80.1% 83.7%

-3.6

80.0%

84.8%

80.4%

4.4

80.0% 88.8%

83.1%

5.7

Updating the Public:% of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry

65.0% 60.7% 59.3%

1.4

65.0% 56.8% 60.4%

-3.6

65.0%

59.2%

56.3%

2.9

65.0% 65.0%

61.2%

3.8

Customer Experience: Overall satisfaction rating of the service provided by Tayside Police

85.0% 83.5% 81.5%

2.0

85.0% 80.4% 83.2%

-2.8

85.0%

83.1%

81.4%

1.7

85.0% 86.6%

80.3%

6.3

203/672 (30.2%)

2011-12 Result

2011-12 Target

91.5% 91.4% 88.5%

269/864 (31.1%)

2011-12 Target

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

3.4

794/2400 (33.1%)

2011-12 Result

2011-12 Target

% / pp Change

2010-11 Result

91.5% 94.0% 90.6%

(Response Rate)

2011-12 Result

First Contact: Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

2011-12 Target

KEY On or above target Below target

322/864 (37.3%)

CRIME Groups 1-4 recorded - Detection rate Violent Crime recorded - Detection rate Robbery recorded - Detection rate Vandalism recorded - Detection rate Domestic Housebreaking recorded - Detection rate

17950

10326 12718

-18.8%

46.5% 47.3% 44.5%

2.8

371

-0.5%

540

373

85.0% 83.6% 82.0%

1.6

79

-12.2%

156

90

70.0% 67.1% 60.0%

7.1

2910

-22.5%

5400

3753

32.0% 30.7% 30.9%

-0.2

452

-28.8%

775

635

30.0% 35.8% 30.1%

5.7

-24.5%

3650

2168

2626

-17.4%

45.5% 46.6% 41.8%

4.8

49.0%

45.4%

50.6%

-5.2

207

3.5%

100

59

64

-7.8%

75.0% 77.3% 70.0%

7.3

96.0%

91.5%

93.8%

-2.3

48

-17.2%

8

5

5

0.0%

80.0%

20

10000

285

110

5334

7061

200

58

62.0% 54.2% 44.8%

9.4

1453

-29.0%

1260

768

887

-13.4%

27.5% 28.2% 26.8%

1.4

37.0%

31.5%

38.4%

-6.9

267

-40.8%

90

69

78

-11.5%

10.6

40.0%

39.1%

51.3%

-12.2

3000

545

2047

451

26.0% 33.7% 23.1%

85.0% 100.0%

4300

2824

48.0% 50.1% 155

105

92.0% 91.4% 38

26

80.0% 84.6% 1140

689

36.0% 34.8% 140

116

40.0% 38.8%

3031

-6.8%

45.5%

4.6

109

-3.7%

97.2%

-5.8

27

-3.7%

88.9%

-4.3

819

-15.9%

33.1%

1.7

106

9.4%

44.3%

-5.5


KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS SCORECARD APRIL-NOVEMBER 2011 continued POLICING TAYSIDE

KEY On or above 3 year average

POLICING DUNDEE

POLICING ANGUS

POLICING PERTH & KINROSS

2011-12 Target

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

% / pp Change

2011-12 Target

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Target

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Target

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

People killed

28

15

23

-34.8%

N/A

0

3

-100.0%

N/A

4

6

-33.3%

N/A

11

14

-21.4%

People seriously injured

248

139

128

8.6%

N/A

37

30

23.3%

N/A

37

36

2.8%

N/A

65

62

4.8%

Children killed

1

1

0

#DIV/0!

N/A

0

0

#DIV/0!

N/A

0

0

#DIV/0!

N/A

1

0

#DIV/0!

Children seriously injured

29

17

18

-5.6%

N/A

9

9

0.0%

N/A

6

6

0.0%

N/A

2

3

-33.3%

Sickness Absence - police officers

4.0%

3.9%

4.0%

-0.1

4.0%

3.3%

3.8%

-0.5

4.0%

5.7%

5.5%

0.2

4.0%

4.4%

4.2%

0.2

Sickness Absence - police staff

4.5%

3.7%

4.7%

-1

4.5%

3.7%

3.4%

0.3

4.5%

5.0%

4.3%

0.7

4.5%

2.5%

5.9%

-3.4218

Below 3 year average

ROAD CASUALTIES

RESOURCES

Finance - Variance from budget

COMMUNITY PRIORITIES

VISION AND VALUES

STANDARDS OF SERVICE

REVIEW RESULTS

MANAGE RESOURCES

ENGAGE AND LISTEN


TAYSIDE CRIME IN MORE DETAIL PERIOD APRIL to NOVEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION

2010/2011 Made known

2011/2012

DETECTIONS number %

Made known

DETECTIONS number %

INC./DEC. number %

GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others GROUP 1 - TOTAL

0 31 0 176 90 39 4 20 12 1

0 29 0 149 54 41 4 18 11 0

93.5% 84.7% 60.0% 105.1% 100.0% 90.0% 91.7% 0.0%

7 51 0 151 79 57 5 9 9 3

7 47 0 122 53 60 3 8 7 3

100.0% 92.2% 80.8% 67.1% 105.3% 60.0% 88.9% 77.8% 100.0%

7 20 0 -25 -11 18 1 -11 -3 2

64.5% -14.2% -12.2% 46.2% 25.0% -55.0% -25.0% 200.0%

373

306

82.0%

371

310

83.6%

-2

-0.5%

37 7 106 46 27 52

17 4 70 40 17 41

45.9% 57.1% 66.0% 87.0% 63.0% 78.8%

53 1 143 27 36 36

35 0 88 16 17 31

66.0% 0.0% 61.5% 59.3% 47.2% 86.1%

16 -6 37 -19 9 -16

43.2% -85.7% 34.9% -41.3% 33.3% -30.8%

275

189

68.7%

296

187

63.2%

21

7.6%

635 268 348 191 469 313 11 166 4838 253 32 32 397 79

191 82 116 58 75 161 11 115 2655 52 32 23 247 41

30.1% 30.6% 33.3% 30.4% 16.0% 51.4% 100.0% 69.3% 54.9% 20.6% 100.0% 71.9% 62.2% 51.9%

452 179 226 125 284 218 13 149 4213 225 39 14 335 63

162 28 86 33 86 108 13 124 2398 86 39 16 202 10

35.8% 15.6% 38.1% 26.4% 30.3% 49.5% 100.0% 83.2% 56.9% 38.2% 100.0% 114.3% 60.3% 15.9%

-183 -89 -122 -66 -185 -95 2 -17 -625 -28 7 -18 -62 -16

-28.8% -33.2% -35.1% -34.6% -39.4% -30.4% 18.2% -10.2% -12.9% -11.1% 21.9% -56.3% -15.6% -20.3%

8032

3859

48.0%

6535

3391

51.9%

-1497

-18.6%

153 3753 132

47 1160 95

30.7% 30.9% 72.0%

109 2910 105

35 892 71

32.1% 30.7% 67.6%

-44 -843 -27

-28.8% -22.5% -20.5%

4038

1302

32.2%

3124

998

31.9%

-914

-22.6%

12718

5656

44.5%

10326

4886

47.3%

-2392

-18.8%

136 6 229 48 0 565 265 299 1416 31 71

135 6 228 45 3 550 243 299 1417 30 69

99.3% 100.0% 99.6% 93.8% 97.3% 91.7% 100.0% 100.1% 96.8% 97.2%

63 9 210 76 3 540 231 196 1595 42 80

64 9 212 75 3 532 221 195 1598 45 70

101.6% 100.0% 101.0% 98.7% 100.0% 98.5% 95.7% 99.5% 100.2% 107.1% 87.5%

-73 3 -19 28 3 -25 -34 -103 179 11 9

-53.7% 50.0% -8.3% 58.3% -4.4% -12.8% -34.4% 12.6% 35.5% 12.7%

3066

3025

98.7%

3045

3024

99.3%

-21

-0.7%

15784

8681

55.0%

13371

7910

59.2%

-2413

-15.3%

GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL

GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL

GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL

SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4

GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL

TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5

Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.

6


KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011 POLICING DUNDEE

SECTION 1 City Centre and Maryfield

SECTION 2 Lochee and Ryehill

SECTION 3 Downfield and Hilltown

SECTION 4 Longhaugh and Broughty Ferry

2010-11 Result

% / pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

5334

7061

-24.5%

1439

2101

-31.5%

1331

1645

-19.1%

1372

1571

-12.7%

1192

1744

-31.7%

- Detection rate

46.6%

41.8%

4.8

58.2%

52.2%

6

44.0%

37.8%

6.2

42.9%

39.5%

3.4

40.0%

35.0%

5

207

200

3.5%

57

59

-3.4%

54

41

31.7%

50

33

51.5%

46

67

-31.3%

- Detection rate

77.3%

70.0%

7.3

68.4%

66.1%

2.3

83.3%

65.9%

17.4

78.0%

84.8%

-6.8

80.4%

68.7%

11.7

Indecency (G2)

155

136

14.0%

59

57

3.5%

36

20

80.0%

35

32

9.4%

25

27

-7.4%

- Detection rate

59.4%

60.3%

-0.9

69.5%

77.2%

-7.7

61.1%

45.0%

16.1

54.3%

46.8%

7.5

40.0%

51.9%

-11.9

Dishonesty (G3)

3400

4505

-24.5%

1041

1499

-30.6%

889

1078

-17.5%

823

936

-12.1%

647

992

-34.8%

- Detection rate

52.2%

46.8%

5.4

64.6%

58.1%

6.5

48.6%

44.3%

4.3

43.7%

37.9%

5.8

47.9%

40.7%

7.2

Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4)

1572

2220

-29.2%

282

486

-42.0%

352

506

-30.4%

464

570

-18.6%

474

658

-28.0%

- Detection rate

29.3%

27.9%

1.4

30.1%

29.4%

0.7

24.7%

21.3%

3.4

36.6%

38.9%

-2.3

25.1%

22.2%

2.9

48

58

-17.2%

14

23

-39.1%

16

12

33.3%

10

12

-16.7%

8

11

-27.3%

- Detection rate

54.2%

44.8%

9.4

35.7%

43.5%

-7.8

62.5%

33.3%

29.2

70.0%

75.0%

-5

50.0%

27.3%

22.7

Vandalism

1453

2047

-29.0%

258

449

-42.5%

320

468

-31.6%

421

520

-19.0%

454

610

-25.6%

- Detection rate

28.1%

26.8%

1.3

27.9%

26.1%

1.8

24.1%

20.3%

3.8

35.9%

39.2%

-3.3

24.0%

21.6%

2.4

268

451

-40.6%

29

87

-66.7%

70

102

-31.4%

94

120

-21.7%

75

142

-47.2%

33.6%

23.1%

10.5

37.9%

24.1%

13.8

22.9%

15.7%

7

31.9%

32.5%

-0.6

44.0%

19.7%

24.3

Violent Crime (G1)

7 Robbery

Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate

Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.

POLICING DUNDEE

2011-12 Result

Groups 1-4

CRIME


SECTION 1 City Centre and Maryfield

POLICING DUNDEE

SECTION 3 Downfield and Hilltown

SECTION 4 Longhaugh and Broughty Ferry

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

% / pp Change

Response Rate

2010-11 Result

8

First Contact % of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry Updating the Public % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry Customer Experience Overall satisfaction rating of the service provided by Tayside Police

2011-12 Result

First Contact Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact

2011-12 Target

Customer Satisfaction

SECTION 2 Lochee and Ryehill

91.5%

91.4% 88.5%

2.9

97.4% 89.8%

7.6

91.6% 85.3%

6.3

90.2% 87.7%

2.5

89.2% 92.2%

-3.0

80.0%

80.1% 83.7%

-3.6

87.0% 84.0%

3.0

78.0% 81.6%

-3.6

82.7% 82.5%

0.2

76.0% 87.5%

-11.5

65.0%

56.8% 60.4%

-3.6

66.7% 74.4%

-7.7

56.6% 51.7%

4.9

57.1% 66.7%

-9.6

50.8% 52.8%

-2.0

85.0%

80.4% 83.2%

-2.8

88.6% 87.5%

1.1

78.3% 79.2%

-0.9

77.4% 85.5%

-8.1

80.6% 82.3%

-1.7

269/864 (31.1%)

44/156 (28.2%)

65/211 (30.8%)

Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the small sub-sample sizes. First Contact - Improvement in satisfaction with service at first contact from 88.5% to 91.4% - Reduction in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 83.7% to 80.1% Updating the Public - Reduction in updating the public from 60.4% to 56.8% Customer Experience - Reduction in overall customer experience from 83.2% to 80.4%.

86/260 (33.1%)

74/237 (31.2%)

Policing Dundee: Standards of Service ~ April - November

KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011


POLICING DUNDEE

SECTION 1 City Centre and Maryfield

SECTION 2 Lochee and Ryehill

SECTION 3 Downfield and Hilltown

SECTION 4 Longhaugh and Broughty Ferry

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

% / pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year

77.7%

63.4%

14.3

81.0%

63.4%

17.6

69.2%

55.5%

13.7

75.6%

65.8%

9.8

84.6%

68.5%

16.1

Feelings of safety after dark % of residents who felt safe walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark

52.4%

47.9%

4.5

51.7%

36.9%

14.8

40.4%

49.0%

-8.6

47.3%

50.0%

-2.7

64.5%

52.6%

11.9

Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood

51.0%

50.0%

1.0

48.3%

59.5%

-11.2

56.6%

50.0%

6.6

54.6%

55.8%

-1.2

45.2%

38.6%

6.6

Public Perception

9 Issues that cause most concern in neighbourhoods *Other includes: Litter, Dog Fouling, Fly tipping etc

Response Rate

Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Dangerous/careless driving Housebreaking Other* Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Assault Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Robbery

Dangerous/careless driving Drug dealing/drug abuse Antisocial behaviour Housebreaking Other Vandalism/graffiti Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Alcohol related crime Motor vehicle crime

Drug dealing/drug abuse Housebreaking Antisocial behaviour Other Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Assault Dangerous/careless driving Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Robbery

Drug dealing/drug abuse Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Other Housebreaking Vandalism/graffiti Assault Alcohol related crime Cause no concern: Robbery Motor vehicle crime

Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Drug dealing/drug abuse Other Housebreaking Assault Cause no concern: Robbery Motor vehicle crime

223/864 (25.8%)

32/154 (20.8%)

56/208 (26.9%)

58/232 (25.0%)

77/270 (28.5%)

Policing Dundee: Public Perception ~ April - November

DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION - APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011


Policing Dundee: Community Summaries ~ April - November 2011 SECTION 1: CITY CENTRE AND MARYFIELD Crime - Overall reduction of 31.5% in Groups 1-4 crime ( 662 crimes), largest reduction in Division - Reduction in crimes of dishonesty of 30.6% (458 crimes) - Largest reduction in Division in vandalism of 42.5% (191 crimes) - Largest reduction in Division in domestic housebreaking of 66.7% (58 crimes) Detection rate - Best detection rate across the Division for Groups 1-4 at 58.2% - Best detection rate across Division for crimes of dishonesty at 58.1% - Significant improvement in detection rate for domestic HB, from 24.1% last year to 37.9% Standards of Service - Decrease in proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 74.4% recorded last year to 66.7%, however still the highest result recorded across the Division - Best result across the Division with an improvement in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 87.5% to 88.6% Public Perception - Substantial improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 63.4% recorded last year to 81% - Similar positive results with respect to people concerned about becoming a victim of crime and feeling safe after dark SECTION 2: LOCHEE AND RYEHILL Crime - Overall reduction of 19.1% in Groups 1-4 crime (314 crimes) - Reduction of 31.6% in vandalism (148 crimes) - Reduction of 31.4% in domestic housebreaking (32 crimes) Detection rate - Improvement in detection rate for crimes of dishonesty from 44.3% to 48.6% - Improvement in detection rate for vandalism from 20.3% to 24.1% Standards of Service - Improvement of 4 percentage points in updating the public, from 51.7% to 56.6% Public Perception - Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 55.5% recorded last year to 69.2% - Drop in the proportion of people feeling safe after dark, from 49% to 40.4% - Similar scenario with respect to concern about becoming a victim of crime, increasing from 50% to 56.6% SECTION 3: DOWNFIELD AND HILLTOWN Crime - Overall reduction of 12.7% in Groups 1-4 crime (199 crimes) - Reduction of 19% in vandalism (99 crimes) - Reduction of 21.7% in domestic housebreaking (26 crimes) Detection rate - Improvement in detection rate for crimes of dishonesty from 37.9% to 43.7% Standards of Service - Decrease in proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry

10


Policing Dundee: Community Summaries ~ April - November 2011 from 66.7% recorded last year to 57.1% - Decrease in overall customer satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 85.5% recorded last year to 77.4% Public Perception - Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 65.8% recorded last year to 75.6% SECTION 4: LONGHAUGH AND BROUGHTY FERRY Crime - Largest reduction in Division in Groups 1-4 crime of 31.7% (552 crimes) - Largest reduction in Division in violent crime (31.3%, 21 crimes) - Largest reduction in Division in crimes of dishonesty of 34.8% (345 crimes) set against an improved detection rate - Reduction in vandalism of 25.6% (156 crimes) - Continued reduction in domestic housebreaking of 47.2% (67 crimes) Detection rate - Best detection rate for domestic HB across Division, significant improvement from 19.7% to 44% Standards of Service - Decrease of 2 percentage points in proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry, from 52.8% recorded last year to 50.8%, lowest result across Division Public Perception - Substantial improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 68.5% recorded last year to 84.6%, the best result across the Division - Similar improvement in people feeling safe after dark, from 52.6% to 64.5%, the best result across the Division - Conversely, increase in concern about becoming a victim of crime, from 38.6% to 45.2%, but still the best result across the Division

11


POLICING DUNDEE: Crime in more detail PERIOD APRIL to NOVEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION

2010/2011 Made known

2011/2012

DETECTIONS number %

Made known

DETECTIONS number %

INC./DEC. number %

GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others

0 17 0 87 58 18 2 12 5 1

0 15 0 63 26 18 2 11 5 0

88.2% 72.4% 44.8% 100.0% 100.0% 91.7% 100.0% 0.0%

1 24 0 94 48 26 5 4 2 3

1 21 0 73 26 29 3 3 1 3

100.0% 87.5% 77.7% 54.2% 111.5% 60.0% 75.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1 7 0 7 -10 8 3 -8 -3 2

41.2% 8.0% -17.2% 44.4% 150.0% -66.7% -60.0% 200.0%

200

140

70.0%

207

160

77.3%

7

3.5%

22 3 39 17 20 35

10 2 19 7 12 32

45.5% 66.7% 48.7% 41.2% 60.0% 91.4%

27 0 64 17 15 32

16 0 30 11 8 27

59.3% 46.9% 64.7% 53.3% 84.4%

5 -3 25 0 -5 -3

22.7% -100.0% 64.1% 0.0% -25.0% -8.6%

136

82

60.3%

155

92

59.4%

19

14.0%

451 158 121 92 336 174 10 67 2685 128 22 14 200 47

104 51 36 33 48 72 10 41 1535 18 22 6 119 13

23.1% 32.3% 29.8% 35.9% 14.3% 41.4% 100.0% 61.2% 57.2% 14.1% 100.0% 42.9% 59.5% 27.7%

267 98 99 51 170 114 11 69 2210 96 22 5 151 37

90 15 24 9 47 50 11 61 1323 28 22 8 84 2

33.7% 15.3% 24.2% 17.6% 27.6% 43.9% 100.0% 88.4% 59.9% 29.2% 100.0% 160.0% 55.6% 5.4%

-184 -60 -22 -41 -166 -60 1 2 -475 -32 0 -9 -49 -10

-40.8% -38.0% -18.2% -44.6% -49.4% -34.5% 10.0% 3.0% -17.7% -25.0% 0.0% -64.3% -24.5% -21.3%

4505

2108

46.8%

3400

1774

52.2%

-1105

-24.5%

98 2047 75

22 548 49

22.4% 26.8% 65.3%

59 1453 60

15 410 36

25.4% 28.2% 60.0%

-39 -594 -15

-39.8% -29.0% -20.0%

GROUP 4 - TOTAL

2220

619

27.9%

1572

461

29.3%

-648

-29.2%

SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4

7061

2949

41.8%

5334

2487

46.6%

-1727

-24.5%

70 0 84 24 0 282 154 115 687 21 46

69 0 84 20 3 269 140 117 682 19 44

98.6% 100.0% 83.3% 95.4% 90.9% 101.7% 99.3% 90.5% 95.7%

35 3 89 47 2 290 138 118 707 22 52

36 3 90 46 2 283 131 117 707 25 47

102.9% 100.0% 101.1% 97.9% 100.0% 97.6% 94.9% 99.2% 100.0% 113.6% 90.4%

-35 3 5 23 2 8 -16 3 20 1 6

-50.0% 6.0% 95.8% 2.8% -10.4% 2.6% 2.9% 4.8% 13.0%

GROUP 5 - TOTAL

1483

1447

97.6%

1503

1487

98.9%

20

1.3%

TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5

8544

4396

51.5%

6837

3974

58.1%

-1707

-20.0%

GROUP 1 - TOTAL

GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL

GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL

GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others

GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others

Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.

12


KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011 SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir

POLICING ANGUS

SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin

SECTION 3

SECTION 4

Arbroath

Carnoustie

2010-11 Result

% / pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2626

-17.4%

621

764

-18.7%

486

697

-30.3%

788

916

-14.0%

273

249

9.6%

45.4%

50.6%

-5.2

40.3%

46.7%

-6.4

48.1%

57.1%

-9

51.1%

50.1%

1

39.2%

45.8%

-6.6

59

64

-7.8%

10

19

-47.4%

9

13

-30.8%

30

22

36.4%

10

10

0.0%

- Detection rate

91.5%

93.8%

-2.3

90.0%

84.2%

5.8

0

90.0%

95.5%

-5.5

90.0%

100.0%

-10

Indecency (G2)

81

75

8.0%

19

14

35.7%

17

23

-26.1%

37

19

94.7%

8

19

-57.9%

- Detection rate

67.9%

96.0%

-28.1

78.9%

50.0%

28.9

64.7%

104.3%

-39.6

64.9%

126.3%

-61.4

62.5%

89.5%

-27

Dishonesty (G3)

1223

1536

-20.4%

384

494

-22.3%

267

361

-26.0%

450

565

-20.4%

122

116

5.2%

- Detection rate

49.6%

53.0%

-3.4

43.5%

49.2%

-5.7

55.1%

56.5%

-1.4

56.9%

55.2%

1.7

30.3%

47.4%

-17.1

805

951

-15.4%

208

237

-12.2%

193

300

-35.7%

271

310

-12.6%

133

104

27.9%

33.3%

40.2%

-6.9

28.4%

38.4%

-10

34.7%

52.3%

-17.6

35.4%

32.9%

2.5

34.6%

30.8%

3.8

5

5

0.0%

0

3

***

1

0

***

3

2

50.0%

1

0

***

100.0%

80.0%

20

0.0%

66.7%

***

100.0%

0.0%

***

0

100.0%

0.0%

***

768

887

-13.4%

200

219

-8.7%

178

288

-38.2%

258

284

-9.2%

132

96

37.5%

31.5%

38.4%

-6.9

27.0%

37.9%

-10.9

31.5%

51.7%

-20.2

33.7%

29.6%

4.1

34.1%

26.0%

8.1

69

78

-11.5%

30

30

0.0%

17

19

-10.5%

16

25

-36.0%

6

4

50.0%

39.1%

51.3%

-12.2

33.3%

50.0%

-16.7

41.2%

52.6%

-11

50.0%

56.0%

-6

33.3%

25.0%

8.3

Groups 1-4 - Detection rate Violent Crime (G1)

13

Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4) - Detection rate Robbery - Detection rate Vandalism - Detection rate Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate

100.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.

POLICING ANGUS

2011-12 Result 2168

CRIME


SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir

POLICING ANGUS

SECTION 3 Arbroath

SECTION 4 Carnoustie

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

% / pp Change

Response Rate

2010-11 Result

14

First Contact % of respondents provided with the name of the person dealing with their enquiry Updating the Public % of customers who received an update on the progress of their enquiry Customer Experience Overall satisfaction rating of the service provided by Tayside Police

2011-12 Result

First Contact Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact

2011-12 Target

Customer Satisfaction

SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin

91.5%

91.3% 92.2%

-0.9

93.8% 88.1%

5.7

88.3% 91.7%

-3.4

90.4% 94.4%

-4.0

94.1% 100.0%

-5.9

80.0%

84.8% 80.4%

4.4

90.9% 76.9%

14.0

90.9% 82.9%

8.0

75.0% 81.7%

-6.7

85.7% 80.0%

5.7

65.0%

59.2% 56.3%

2.9

60.5% 52.0%

8.5

43.8% 60.7%

-16.9

66.0% 56.8%

9.2

69.7% 57.9%

11.8

85.0%

83.1% 81.4%

1.7

78.8% 78.8%

0.0

80.4% 81.2%

-0.8

87.2% 81.2%

6.0

86.5% 91.7%

-5.2

203/672 (30.2%)

50/169 (29.6%)

58/174 (33.3%)

57/240 (23.7%)

Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the small sub-sample sizes. First Contact - Reduction in satisfaction with service at first contact from 92.2% to 91.3% - Improvement in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 80.4% to 84.8%. This result well exceeds the force target set at 80.0% Updating the Public - Improvement in updating the public from 56.3% to 59.2% Customer Experience - Improvement in overall customer experience from 81.4% to 83.1%

38/89 (42.7%)

Policing Angus: Standards of Service ~ April - November

KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011


SECTION 1 Forfar and Kirriemuir

POLICING ANGUS

SECTION 2 Montrose and Brechin

SECTION 3 Arbroath

SECTION 4 Carnoustie

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

% / pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year

70.3%

74.9%

-4.6

75.8%

66.7%

9.1

72.3%

78.1%

-5.8

55.2%

66.0%

-10.8

77.5%

94.4%

-16.9

Feelings of safety after dark % of residents who felt safe walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark

66.0%

65.2%

0.8

60.8%

71.9%

-11.1

63.9%

52.1%

11.8

56.5%

58.4%

-1.9

77.6%

80.0%

-2.4

Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood

33.0%

35.8%

-2.8

27.9%

25.0%

2.9

19.6%

37.5%

-17.9

54.1%

52.2%

1.9

30.3%

22.0%

8.3

Public Perception

15

Issues that cause most concern in neighbourhoods *Other includes: Litter, Dog Fouling, Fly tipping etc

Response Rate

Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Other* Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Housebreaking Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime 212/672 (31.5%)

Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Vandalism/graffiti Housebreaking Other Alcohol related crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime

Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Other Alcohol related crime Vandalism/graffiti Housebreaking Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime

Dangerous/careless driving Drug dealing/drug abuse Antisocial behaviour Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Housebreaking Other Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime

Dangerous/reckless driving Antisocial behaviour Other Drug dealing/drug abuse Alcohol related crime Housebreaking Vandalism/graffiti Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Motor vehicle crime

47/162 (29.0%)

47/159 (29.5%)

49/181 (27.1%)

69/170 (40.6%)

Policing Angus: Public Perception ~ April - November

DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION - APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011


Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April - November 2011 SECTION 1: FORFAR AND KIRRIEMUIR Crime - Overall reduction of 18.7% in Groups 1-4 crime (143crimes), a further improvement on the 17.3% recorded last month - Reduction in crimes of dishonesty of 22.3% (110 crimes), a further improvement on the 20.1% recorded last month - Section continues to show no robberies recorded to date - Reduction of 8.7% in vandalism (19 crimes), a further improvement on the 7.3% recorded last month Standards of Service - Improvement in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry, from 52% recorded last year to 60.5% Public Perception - Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 66.7% recorded last year to 75.8% Drop in the proportion of people feeling safe after dark, from 71.9% to 60.8% SECTION 2: MONTROSE AND BRECHIN Crime - Largest reduction in Division in Groups 1-4 crime (30.3%, 211crimes) - Reduction in crimes of dishonesty of 26% (94 crimes), a further improvement over the 23% recorded last month - Reduction of 38.2% in vandalism (110 crimes), and the best result recorded for the Division Detection rate - Dip in detection rate for overall crime groups 1-4, from 57.1% last year to 48.1% - Dip in detection rate for vandalism from 51.7% to 31.5% Standards of Service - Substantial decrease in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 60.7% recorded last year to 43.8%, the lowest result recorded across the Division Public Perception - Drop in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 78.1% recorded last year to 72.3% - Improvement in people feeling safe after dark, from 52.1% to 63.9% Marked reduction in the proportion of people who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime, from 37.5% to 19.6%, the best result across the Division SECTION 3: ARBROATH Crime - Overall reduction of 14% in Groups 1-4 crime (128 crimes) - Reduction in crimes of dishonesty of 20.4% (115 crimes) Detection rate - Best detection rate across the division for Groups 1-4 at 51.1% - Best detection rate across the division for crimes of dishonesty at 56.9% - Best detection rate across the division for housebreaking at 50% Standards of Service - Improvement in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry, from 56.8% recorded last year to 66% - Improvement in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 81.2% to 87.2%, the best

16


Policing Angus: Community Summaries ~ April - November 2011 result across the Division Public Perception Drop in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 66% recorded last year to 55.2% SECTION 4: CARNOUSTIE Crime - Only Section to show increase in Groups 1-4 crimes (9.6%, 24 crimes) - Increase in vandalism of 37.5%, (36 crimes) Detection rate - Improvement in detection rate for vandalism, from 26% to 34.1% Standards of Service - Substantial improvement in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry, from 57.9% recorded last year to 69.7%, the best result across the Division - Decrease in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 91.7% to 86.5%, however, still the best result across the Division Public Perception - Drop in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 94.4% recorded last year to 77.5%, but still the best result across the Division - Best result across Division for proportion of people feeling safe after dark, 77.6% - Concern about becoming a victim of crime has increased from 22% to 30.3%

17


POLICING ANGUS: Crime in more detail PERIOD APRIL to NOVEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION

2010/2011 Made known

2011/2012

DETECTIONS number %

Made known

DETECTIONS number %

INC./DEC. number %

GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others GROUP 1 - TOTAL

0 3 0 42 5 11 1 1 1 0

0 3 0 39 4 12 1 1 0 0

100.0% 92.9% 80.0% 109.1% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -

2 5 0 28 5 12 0 4 3 0

2 5 0 24 5 12 0 4 2 0

100.0% 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% -

2 2 0 -14 0 1 -1 3 2 0

66.7% -33.3% 0.0% 9.1% -100.0% 300.0% 200.0% -

64

60

93.8%

59

54

91.5%

-5

-7.8%

8 1 38 15 4 9

2 2 32 27 4 5

25.0% 200.0% 84.2% 180.0% 100.0% 55.6%

16 0 49 6 9 1

10 0 35 5 4 1

62.5% 71.4% 83.3% 44.4% 100.0%

8 -1 11 -9 5 -8

100.0% -100.0% 28.9% -60.0% 125.0% -88.9%

75

72

96.0%

81

55

67.9%

6

8.0%

78 62 74 49 24 53 0 34 993 56 6 10 87 10

40 24 19 15 5 32 0 21 545 20 6 8 67 12

51.3% 38.7% 25.7% 30.6% 20.8% 60.4% 61.8% 54.9% 35.7% 100.0% 80.0% 77.0% 120.0%

69 32 50 24 26 37 0 21 841 50 3 3 65 2

27 6 15 9 3 25 0 18 452 14 3 3 30 2

39.1% 18.8% 30.0% 37.5% 11.5% 67.6% 85.7% 53.7% 28.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.2% 100.0%

-9 -30 -24 -25 2 -16 0 -13 -152 -6 -3 -7 -22 -8

-11.5% -48.4% -32.4% -51.0% 8.3% -30.2% -38.2% -15.3% -10.7% -50.0% -70.0% -25.3% -80.0%

1536

814

53.0%

1223

607

49.6%

-313

-20.4%

32 887 32

14 341 27

43.8% 38.4% 84.4%

17 768 20

8 242 18

47.1% 31.5% 90.0%

-15 -119 -12

-46.9% -13.4% -37.5%

951

382

40.2%

805

268

33.3%

-146

-15.4%

2626

1328

50.6%

2168

984

45.4%

-458

-17.4%

26 5 59 15 0 133 48 81 263 2 15

26 5 59 15 0 132 44 81 264 2 15

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 91.7% 100.0% 100.4% 100.0% 100.0%

12 2 61 8 1 116 36 28 205 8 13

13 2 61 8 1 115 35 29 208 7 11

108.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% 97.2% 103.6% 101.5% 87.5% 84.6%

-14 -3 2 -7 1 -17 -12 -53 -58 6 -2

-53.8% -60.0% 3.4% -46.7% -12.8% -25.0% -65.4% -22.1% 300.0% -13.3%

647

643

99.4%

490

490 100.0%

-157

-24.3%

3273

1971

60.2%

2658

-615

-18.8%

GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to rape Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL

GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL

GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL

SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4

GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL

TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5

1474

55.5%

Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.

18


KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD APRIL -NOVEMBER 2011 SECTION 3

SECTION 5

SECTION 6

Perth City

East Perthshire

South Perthshire

SECTION 7 North and West Perthshire

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

% / pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2826

3031

-6.8%

1575

1643

-4.1%

505

496

1.8%

578

618

-6.5%

168

274

-38.7%

50.1%

45.5%

4.6

55.3%

51.2%

4.1

45.3%

46.6%

-1.3

44.3%

35.3%

9

35.1%

32.1%

3

105

109

-3.7%

71

69

2.9%

13

22

-40.9%

15

17

-11.8%

6

1

500.0%

- Detection rate

91.4%

97.3%

-5.9

95.8%

94.2%

1.6

84.6%

109.1%

-24.5

73.3%

94.1%

-20.8

Indecency (G2)

60

64

-6.3%

24

28

-14.3%

17

21

-19.0%

17

9

88.9%

2

6

-66.7%

- Detection rate

66.7%

54.7%

12

70.8%

64.3%

6.5

70.6%

42.9%

27.7

64.7%

77.8%

-13.1

0.0%

16.7%

-16.7

Dishonesty (G3)

1914

1991

-3.9%

1063

1106

-3.9%

314

297

5.7%

421

411

2.4%

116

177

-34.5%

- Detection rate

52.8%

47.1%

5.7

60.1%

55.9%

4.2

43.9%

44.8%

-0.9

47.0%

29.7%

17.3

31.0%

35.6%

-4.6

747

867

-13.8%

417

440

-5.2%

161

156

3.2%

125

181

-30.9%

44

90

-51.1%

36.0%

34.7%

1.3

35.5%

32.0%

3.5

42.2%

41.7%

0.5

28.8%

40.3%

-11.5

38.6%

24.4%

14.2

26

27

-3.7%

23

21

9.5%

0

1

***

3

4

-25.0%

0

1

***

84.6%

88.9%

-4.3

91.3%

90.5%

0.8

0.0%

100.0%

***

33.3%

75.0%

-41.7

0.0%

100.0%

***

689

819

-15.9%

383

415

-7.7%

150

147

2.0%

116

170

-31.8%

40

87

-54.0%

34.7%

33.1%

1.6

34.2%

29.6%

4.6

42.0%

39.5%

2.5

25.9%

40.0%

-14.1

37.5%

25.3%

12.2

116

106

9.4%

69

69

0.0%

20

16

25.0%

24

17

41.2%

3

4

-25.0%

38.8%

44.3%

-5.5

37.7%

50.7%

-13

40.0%

37.5%

3

41.7%

35.3%

6.4

33.3%

0.0%

33.3

CRIME Groups 1-4 - Detection rate Violent Crime (G1)

19

Mal Mischief, vandalism (G4) - Detection rate Robbery - Detection rate Vandalism - Detection rate Domestic Housebreaking - Detection rate

Caution! Variation in results may appear extreme due to very small numbers of crimes involved. Cells with symbol *** mean that a valid percentage change could not be calculated.

100.0% 100.0%

0

POLICING PERTH & KINROSS

POLICING PERTH & KINROSS


SECTION 3 Perth City

POLICING PERTH & KINROSS

SECTION 6 South Perthshire

SECTION 7 North & West Perthshire

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

%/pp Change

2010-11 Result

2011-12 Result

Response Rate

% / pp Change

20

First Contact % of respondents provided with 80.0% the name of the person dealing with their enquiry Updating the Public % of customers who received 65.0% an update on the progress of their enquiry Customer Experience Overall satisfaction rating of the 85.0% service provided by Tayside Police

2010-11 Result

91.5%

2011-12 Result

First Contact Overall satisfaction rating for service provided at first contact

2011-12 Target

Customer Satisfaction

SECTION 5 East Perthshire

98.0% 90.7%

7.3

97.1% 87.9%

9.2

100.0% 95.9%

4.1

97.2% 90.6%

6.6

100.0% 86.4%

13.6

88.8% 83.1%

5.7

89.1% 78.5%

10.6

91.4% 85.7%

5.7

90.0% 91.7%

-1.7

80.0% 66.7%

13.3

65.0% 61.2%

3.8

60.3% 58.9%

1.4

70.6% 69.8%

0.8

65.7% 59.5%

6.2

73.9% 68.4%

5.5

86.6% 80.3%

6.3

85.9% 77.2%

8.7

89.5% 82.7%

6.8

86.7% 83.3%

3.4

83.4% 82.6%

0.8

322/863 (37.3%)

147/438 (33.6%)

60/185 (32.4%)

84/180 (46.7%)

31/60 (51.7%)

Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results at sectional level due to the small sub-sample sizes. First Contact - Improvement in satisfaction with service at first contact from 90.7% to 98.0%, the highest result across the force. This result well exceeds the force target set at 91.5% - Improvement in identifying the person dealing with the enquiry from 83.1% to 88.8%, the highest result across the force. This result again well exceeds the force target set at 80.0% Updating the Public - Improvement in updating the public from 61.2% to 65.0%, the highest result across the force and achieves the force target set at 65.0% Customer Experience - Improvement in overall customer experience from 80.3% to 86.6%, the highest result across the force. This result exceeds the force target set at 85.0%

Policing Perth & Kinross: Standards of Service ~ April - November

KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS: DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - STANDARDS OF SERVICE - APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011


SECTION 3 Perth City

POLICING PERTH & KINROSS

SECTION 5 East Perthshire

SECTION 6 South Perthshire

SECTION 7 North & West Perthshire

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

% / pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

2011-12 Result

2010-11 Result

%/pp Change

Crime in neighbourhood % of residents who thought that the crime rate in their neighbourhood had remained the same or improved over the past year

72.8%

75.2%

-2.4

72.1%

64.4%

7.7

78.2%

78.1%

0.1

68.8%

84.7%

-15.9

75.0%

70.2%

4.8

Feelings of safety after dark % of residents who felt safe walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark

71.3%

69.2%

2.1

58.1%

47.5%

10.6

71.8%

75.0%

-3.2

81.1%

77.9%

3.2

77.7%

78.8%

-1.1

Concerns at becoming a victim of crime % of residents concerned at becoming a victim of crime in their neighbourhood

27.9%

27.4%

0.5

27.7%

40.2%

-12.5

32.6%

22.3%

10.3

28.6%

24.8%

3.8

13.8%

19.2%

-5.4

Public Perception

21 Issues that cause most concern in neighbourhoods *Other includes: Litter, Dog Fouling, Fly tipping etc

Response Rate

Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Housebreaking Other* Alcohol related crime Vandalism/graffiti Drug dealing/drug abuse Motor vehicle crime Assault Cause no concern: Robbery 299/864 (34.6%)

Antisocial behaviour Drug dealing/drug abuse Other Housebreaking Alcohol related crime Dangerous/careless driving Vandalism/graffiti Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery

Dangerous/careless driving Antisocial behaviour Housebreaking Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Other Drug dealing/drug abuse Assault Cause no concern: Robbery Motor vehicle crime

Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Housebreaking Other Vandalism/graffiti Alcohol related crime Drug dealing/drug abuse Motor vehicle crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery

Antisocial behaviour Dangerous/careless driving Other Vandalism/graffiti Housebreaking Alcohol related crime Cause no concern: Assault Robbery Drug dealing/drug abuse Motor vehicle crime

87/264 (32.9%)

81/229 (35.4%)

102/271 (37.6%)

29/100 (29.0%)

Policing Perth & Kinross: Public Perception ~ April - November

DIVISIONAL SCORECARD - PUBLIC PERCEPTION - APRIL - NOVEMBER 2011


Policing Perth & Kinross: Community Summaries ~ April - November 2011

SECTION 3: PERTH CITY Crime - Slight reduction in Groups 1-4 crime (4.1%, 68 crimes) Detection rate - Best detection rate across the Division for Groups 1-4 at 55.3% , a further improvement over last month's 52.7% - Best detection rate across the division for crimes of dishonesty at 60.1%, a further improvement on the 56.8% recorded last month Standards of Service - Substantial improvement in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 77.2% to 85.9% Public Perception - Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 64.4% recorded last year to 72.1% - Improvement in people feeling safe after dark, from 47.5% to 58.1% - Marked reduction in the proportion of people who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime, from 40.2% to 27.7% SECTION 5: EAST PERTHSHIRE Crime - Slight increase in groups 1-4 crime, only 9 crimes - No robberies recorded since the beginning of the year Detection rate - Best detection rate across the Division for vandalism at 42% Standards of Service - Substantial improvement in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 82.7% to 89.5%, the best result across the Division Public Perception - Best result across the Division with respect to the proportion of people who thought crime in their neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, 78.2% - Increase in the proportion of people who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime, from 22.3% to 32.6% SECTION 6: SOUTH PERTHSHIRE Crime - Reduction of 6.5% in Groups 1-4 crime (40 crimes) - Reduction of 31.8% in vandalism (54 crimes) Detection rate - Crimes of dishonesty detection rate of 47%, a 17.3 percentage point improvement over the previous year - Best detection rate across the division for domestic housebreaking at 41.7%, Standards of Service - Improvement in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 59.5% recorded last year to 65.7% - Improvement in overall satisfaction with the service provided by the police, from 83.3% to 86.7% Public Perception - Improvement in the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained 22


Policing Perth & Kinross: Community Summaries ~ April - November 2011 the same, from 84.7% recorded last year to 68.8% - Best result across the Division with respect to people feeling safe after dark, 81.1% SECTION 7: NORTH AND WEST PERTHSHIRE Crime - Reduction of 38.7% in Groups 1-4 crime (106 crimes), best result across Division - Reduction of 34.5% in crimes of dishonesty (61 crimes), best result across the division - No robberies recorded since the beginning of the year - Significant reduction of 54% in vandalism (47 crimes), best result across the Division Detection rate - Low level of vandalism recorded (40) and high detection rate of 37.5%, an improvement of 12.2 percentage points over last year Standards of Service - Improvement in the proportion of people who stated they had received an update on the progress of their enquiry from 68.4% recorded last year to 73.9%, the best result across the Division Public Perception - Slight improvement with respect to the proportion of people who thought crime in the neighbourhood had improved or remained the same, from 70.2% recorded last year to 75% - Best result across the Division with respect to the proportion of people who were concerned about becoming a victim of crime, 13.8%

23


POLICING PERTH & KINROSS: Crime in more detail PERIOD APRIL to NOVEMBER CRIME CLASSIFICATION

2010/2011 Made known

2011/2012

DETECTIONS number %

Made known

DETECTIONS number %

INC./DEC. number %

GROUP 1 Murder Attempted Murder Culpable Homicide Serious Assault Robbery (Incl attempts) Child Cruelty/Neglect Pos of Firearm with intent to endanger life Abduction Threats Others GROUP 1 - TOTAL

0 11 0 47 27 10 1 7 6 0

0 11 0 47 24 11 1 6 6 0

100.0% 100.0% 88.9% 110.0% 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% -

4 22 0 29 26 19 0 1 4 0

4 21 0 25 22 19 0 1 4 0

100.0% 95.5% 86.2% 84.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -

4 11 0 -18 -1 9 -1 -6 -2 0

100.0% -38.3% -3.7% 90.0% -100.0% -85.7% -33.3% -

109

106

97.2%

105

96

91.4%

-4

-3.7%

7 3 29 14 3 8

5 0 19 6 1 4

71.4% 0.0% 65.5% 42.9% 33.3% 50.0%

10 1 30 4 12 3

9 0 23 0 5 3

90.0% 0.0% 76.7% 0.0% 41.7% 100.0%

3 -2 1 -10 9 -5

42.9% -66.7% 3.4% -71.4% 300.0% -62.5%

64

35

54.7%

60

40

66.7%

-4

-6.3%

106 48 153 50 109 86 1 65 1160 69 4 8 110 22

47 7 61 10 22 57 1 53 575 14 4 9 61 16

44.3% 14.6% 39.9% 20.0% 20.2% 66.3% 100.0% 81.5% 49.6% 20.3% 100.0% 112.5% 55.5% 72.7%

116 49 77 50 88 67 2 59 1162 79 14 6 119 24

45 7 47 15 36 33 2 45 623 44 14 5 88 6

38.8% 14.3% 61.0% 30.0% 40.9% 49.3% 100.0% 76.3% 53.6% 55.7% 100.0% 83.3% 73.9% 25.0%

10 1 -76 0 -21 -19 1 -6 2 10 10 -2 9 2

9.4% 2.1% -49.7% 0.0% -19.3% -22.1% 100.0% -9.2% 0.2% 14.5% 250.0% -25.0% 8.2% 9.1%

1991

937

47.1%

1912

1010

52.8%

-79

-4.0%

23 819 25

11 271 19

47.8% 33.1% 76.0%

33 689 25

12 240 17

36.4% 34.8% 68.0%

10 -130 0

43.5% -15.9% 0.0%

867

301

34.7%

747

269

36.0%

-120

-13.8%

3031

1379

45.5%

2824

1415

50.1%

-207

-6.8%

40 1 86 9 0 150 63 103 466 8 10

40 1 85 10 0 149 59 101 471 9 10

100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 111.1% 99.3% 93.7% 98.1% 101.1% 112.5% 100.0%

16 4 60 21 0 134 57 50 683 12 15

15 4 61 21 0 134 55 49 683 13 12

93.8% 100.0% 101.7% 100.0% 100.0% 96.5% 98.0% 100.0% 108.3% 80.0%

-24 3 -26 12 0 -16 -6 -53 217 4 5

-60.0% 300.0% -30.2% 133.3% -10.7% -9.5% -51.5% 46.6% 50.0% 50.0%

936

935

99.9%

1052

1047

99.5%

116

12.4%

3967

2314

58.3%

3876

2462

63.5%

-91

-2.3%

GROUP 2 Rape Assault with intent to ravish Indecent assault Lewd & Libidinous practices Public Indecency Others GROUP 2 - TOTAL

GROUP 3 Housebreaking ~ domestic dwelling Housebreaking ~ domestic non-dwelling Housebreaking ~ commercial Theft, attempt theft from locked premises/property Theft, attempt theft from locked motor vehicle Theft, attempted theft of a motor vehicle Convicted thief in poss.of tools etc. w.i. to steal In building with intent to steal Theft Theft from motor vehicle Reset Embezzlement Fraud Others GROUP 3 - TOTAL

GROUP 4 Fireraising Malicious Damage/Vandalism Others GROUP 4 - TOTAL

SUB-TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 4

GROUP 5 Public mischief & wasting police time Escape or rescue from police custody or prison Resisting arrest or obstructing police officer General attempts to pervert the course of justice Sex Offenders' register offences Bail - Fail to keep conditions Possession of offensive weapons Drugs - supply, with intent to supply etc Drugs - personal possession Drugs - manufacture etc Others GROUP 5 - TOTAL

TOTAL OF GROUPS 1 TO 5

Please Note: This document is an end of month 'snap-shot' in time and the data may vary from later publications where updates have been taken into consideration.

24



This document is available on the force intranet and web site. It can be viewed there in large print by increasing the magnification on screen.

You can listen to this document as a PDF file by clicking on the ‘View’, menu, selecting ‘Read out aloud’ and ensuring your volume control is turned up.

Ongoing improvement depends on feedback from contributors and users and we would welcome your views. If you require further information about this report please use the contact below.

WHO TO CONTACT Performance and Planning Unit 0300 111 2222 or email performanceandplanning@tayside.pnn.police.uk

www.tayside.police.uk


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.