PhD Thesis by Yu-Hsuan Juan

Page 58

Chapter 3

44 Type Frequency Angular range Accuracy

3-component velocity measurement 600 Hz ±45° acceptance cone wind speed: ± 0.5 m/s wind direction: ± 1° (in the pitch-yaw axes)

Fig. 3.2b shows the measured incident vertical profiles of the dimensionless mean streamwise velocity component (U/Uref) and turbulence intensity (TI/TIref). The incident profiles are those measured in the empty wind tunnel at the location where the buildings will be placed [83]. Note that the reference wind velocity, Uref, and the turbulence intensity, TIref, are taken at building height, yielding values of 13.4 m/s and 8%. The building Reynolds number is 24,745 based on the street passage width (0.028 m) and the reference wind speed of 13.4 m/s, which is well above the critical value of 11,000, for which the flow around a building can be considered as Reynolds number independent [84]. 3.2.2

CFD validation: computational settings and results

The upstream and downstream lengths of the computational domain are 3H and 15H, respectively, according to the best practice guidelines for CFD simulations of wind flow in urban areas [86, 124]. Note that the upstream domain length is smaller than the value proposed by the best practice guidelines, i.e., 5H, to limit unintended changes of streamwise gradients in the vertical approach-flow profiles [49, 87, 88]. The lateral length and the height of the computational domain are chosen equal to the cross-section of wind-tunnel resulting in a blockage ratio of 2.95%, which does not exceed the maximum value recommended by the aforementioned CFD guidelines. The computational grid consists of 5,464,450 hexahedral cells with 20 cells along the passage between the buildings. The average and maximum y* values are 40 and 76, respectively. The grid resolution can ensure that the center points of wall-adjacent cells are located in the logarithmic layer of the boundary layer for the near-wall treatment employing the near-wall treatment. The boundary conditions at the domain inlet are based on the measured incident vertical profiles of mean streamwise velocity, as shown in Fig. 3.2b. The turbulent kinetic energy k is calculated from the measured incident vertical profiles of U(z) and TI (z) using Eq. (3.1). The turbulence dissipation rate ɛ is given by Eq. (3.2) as below: 2

𝑘(𝑧) = 1.5(𝑢(𝑧)𝑇𝐼(𝑧)) 𝑢∗

3

𝐴𝐵𝐿 𝜀(𝑧) = 𝜅(𝑧+𝑧

0)

(3.1) (3.2)

where κ, u*ABL and z0 represent the von Karman constant (= 0.42), the ABL friction velocity (= 0.55 m/s) and the aerodynamic roughness length (9×10-6 m at reduced scale), respectively. The standard wall functions [89] with roughness modification are used on the ground surface. The roughness parameters of the sand-grain roughness height ks (m) and the roughness constant Cs are determined using their consistency relationship with the aerodynamic roughness length z0 [87], (Eq. (3.3)): 𝑘𝑠 =

9.793𝑧0 𝐶𝑠

(3.3)


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

References

29min
pages 151-164

Biography

1min
pages 165-166

4.5 Discussion

3min
pages 105-106

4.4.2 Impact of building corner shape

8min
pages 97-103

5.1 Introduction

13min
pages 112-116

5 Urban wind energy potential for a realistic high-rise urban area

1min
page 111

4.4.1 Impact of urban density

9min
pages 91-96

4.3.3 Computational settings

1min
page 89

4.3.2 Computational domain and grid

2min
page 88

4.2.1 Turbulence model sensitivity analysis

1min
page 85

4.2 CFD validation study

2min
pages 83-84

4 Urban wind energy potential: Impacts of urban density and layout

1min
page 79

3.5.5 Impact of wind direction

1min
page 76

4.1 Introduction

8min
pages 80-82

3.5.4 Impact of wind turbine type and orientation

3min
pages 73-75

3.5.3 Impact of corner radius

2min
pages 71-72

3 Urban wind energy potential: Impacts of building corner modifications

1min
page 53

3.5.2 Impact of chamfer length

2min
page 70

3.4.3 Grid-sensitivity analysis

1min
pages 62-63

2.7 Conclusions

3min
page 52

3.2.2 CFD validation: computational settings and results

3min
pages 58-59

3.3 Test cases

1min
page 60

2.6 Limitations of the study

1min
page 51

Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 131

1min
page 20

buildings (d

12min
pages 42-50

Summary and Conclusions.......................................................................................................... 133

1min
page 21

Summary

2min
page 15

1.4 Thesis outline

3min
pages 23-24

2.2.2 CFD validation: computational domain and grid

1min
page 30

2.2.3 CFD validation: other computational settings

2min
pages 31-32

2 Urban wind energy potential: Impact of building arrangement and height

1min
page 25
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.