Community Commons Master Plan Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Context Watersheds: Tributaries of the Deerfield River BioMap: Priority Conservation Areas Living Waters: Freshwater Habitat Land Use
1 2 3 4
Inventory and Analysis Cole Property Slope Analysis Solar Orientation Protected Resource Areas Apple Trees Sun/Shade Analysis Clearance For Solar Gain Soil Composition (see also Appendix B)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Concepts and Plans Concept Diagram: Element Relationships Access Zones Concept Plan Proposed Plan Plan Summary Meadows & Succession Forest Gardens
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Appendix A: Forest Garden Plant Lists Herbs Herbs, cont. Shrubs Trees & Vines
20 21 22 23
Appendix B: Soil Samples Soil Sample A
24
Soil Sample B Soil Sample C Soil Sample D Soil Sample E Soil Sample F Soil Sample G
25 26 27 28 29 30
Contents Katywil Community Commons Master Plan
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
T
he goal of the Katywil community is to establish an ecologically and socially sustainable community in rural Colrain, Massachusetts. It is hoped that Katywil can serve as a model of sustainablility that other communities can strive toward, and preserve land and ecological health, while enhancing the productivity of the landscape for community residents.
View to the southeast from atop one of the four alluvial terraces within the Katywil development site.
The proposed site of this community is nestled into a south-facing slope of former pasture land with dramatic views of the wooded hillsides of western Massachusetts. This project has assembled a team of architects, civil engineers, landscape architects, and other professionals to develop plans to minimize the impacts of the development in the long and short-term, and to implement energy and resource conservation and production strategies for the community. As students at the Conway School of Landscape Design, we are pleased to be a part of this team in our role of developing a plan for the land use, both cultivation and conservation, for the Katywil community. Prunus pennsylvanica, the native pin cherry’s edible fruit is enjoyed by many species of the abundant wildlife that frequent the property.
The goal of the Katywil Community Commons Master Plan is to develop an adaptable long-range plan that responds to the needs of the community by integrating the functions and harvest of the cultivated and designed landscape with the community while preserving the beauty and integrity of natural lands and fostering stewardship thereof. The plan identifies areas with suggested uses such as a community garden, edible forest gardens, community gathering spaces, meadows, natural areas, and trails that connect the residents to the community and the landscape. Appropriate uses were located based on an area’s accessibility, its sun and shade patterns, soil conditions, and other existing site conditions. The proposed plan attempts to integrate the homes of the community into a unified neighborhood with a shared harvest, shared work, and shared experience of the natural environment.
Remnants of an old apple orchard dot the site, with over 50 trees present on the north western quarter of the property.
Introduction Katywil Community Commons Master Plan
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Deerfield River Watershed
Watersheds of Massachusetts
Deerfield River Watershed Local Drainage Basin
Vincent Brook
Cole Property
Roberrts Brook
Source: Massachusetts Geographic Information System
North
River
The Cole Property is situated within the Deerfield River watershed in northwestern Massachusetts. The property is bisected east to west by the West Branch of the North River. Vincent Brook and Roberts Brook drain across the property from the north and south respectively. As first order streams, the quality of these waterways is critical to the health of the watershed as a whole.
Vincen
est W
Local Drainage Basin
Bra nch
t Brook
Cole Property
Robert
s Brook
Watershed: Tributaries of the Deerfield River Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 1 of 30
N Scale Varies
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Town of Colrain
Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program BioMap
Source: Massachusetts Geographic Information System
Town of Colrain
Cole Property
V i nc ent B rook
Cole Property
BioMap Core Habitat BioMap Supporting Natural Landscape NHESP Priority Rare Species Habitat
W est
Br an
ch
No rt
hR
ive r
Permanently Protected Open Space The Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species BioMap identiďŹ es core habitats throughout the state that are critical to preserving biodiversity. Over 60% of core habitat land remains unprotected. The wildlife rich within these core habitat areas are also dependent upon the supporting natural landscapes, which enhance the core habitat areas. The supporting natural landscapes are large tracts of undeveloped land, roadless areas, and core habitat buers. Colrain is home to a wealth of core habitat areas and supporting natural landscapes, as well as rare species habitat. The Cole Property is part of this system of natural lands.
BioMap: Priority Conservation Areas Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 2 of 30
N Scale Varies
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Town of Colrain
Freshwater Biodiversity in Massachusetts
Source: Massachusetts Geographic Information System
Town of Colrain
Cole Property
Vinc ent B rook
Cole Property
Living Waters Core Habitat Living Waters Critical Supporting Watersheds We st
Living Waters Core Habitats are lakes, ponds, and waterways that protect rare aquatic plant and animal species and provide exceptional habitat for other freshwater species. The Critical Supporting Watersheds are the terrestrial regions that drain into these core habitats. The supporting watersheds have the most significant effect on water quality within these lakes and waterways. The town of Colrain is exceptional in its abundance of high quality streams and rivers. It is crucial to pay close attention to surface water runoff and water quality at Katywil. Vincent Brook and the West Branch are both core freshwater aquatic habitat, and the land of the village is pivotal to their quality.
Living Waters: Freshwater Habitat Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 3 of 30
Br an
ch
No rth
Riv er
s Brook Robert
N Scale Varies
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Town of Colrain Colrain is a rural community in Massachusetts’ northwestern highlands. Over 80% of Colrain remains forested or in a natural state, while pasture and rowcrop agriculture occupy nearly 3300 acres, or 12% of the land. Colrain is sparsely settled, and has few retail stores, and restaurants available to residents.
Cole Property
Cole Property Agriculture Natural Land Industrial Uses Residential
% 2% 4 1%
12 %
Commercial
1%
0.
Surface Water
Colrain Land Use 81% Source: Massachusetts Geographic Information System
Land Use Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 4 of 30
N Scale Varies
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Existing House
Old Pastures
Adamsville Road
Hay Fields
West Branch North River
Locus of Community Commons Plan Bill Cole’s property is bisected by the West Branch of the North River and Adamsville Road. The land is largely forested with hemlocks and hardwoods. Two old pastures with mature apple trees sit on a south-facing slope north of the road. Two ďŹ elds along the river are hayed by local farmers.
Cole Property
Source: Massachusetts Geographic System
Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 5 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
0-3%, at
570
3-8%, gently sloping 0
56
570
8-15%, moderate 56 0
55 56 0
0
15-25%, moderately steep
54 0
550
0
53
25% +, steep
0
54 0
55
0
54
52
0 0
0
53
51
500
520 53 0
0
52
0
51
50 0
52 0 50 0
51
0
490
0
49
0
48 0
490
490
47
500
0
48
450
44 0
480
0
0
43
46
450
460
430
450
44
0
430
42
400
430
0
42
410
0
410
400
40
0
390
390
380
370
360
370
360
350
360
35 0
340
350
340
330
Sources: Massachusetts Geographic System, Property Survey, Studio .625
The Katywil development site sits on a series of alluvial terraces. This terraced slope has an average grade of 12% with widespread moderate to steep slopes throughout, constraining the alignment of roads and accessible paths considerably. The homes are situated at the back side of two of these terraces, nestling them into the hillside and providing more level space in front of the homes.
N
25% and over
15 to 25% 8 to 15% 3 to 8% 0 to 3%
Slope Analysis Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 6 of 30
one inch equals two hundred feet 0 100 200 400 600 Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Northwest-North-Northeast
570
East-West 0
56
570
Southeast-Southwest 56 0
55 56 0
0
South
54 0
550
0
53
0
54 0
55
0
54
52
0 0
0
53
51
500
520 53 0
0
52
0
51
50 0
52 0 50 0
51
0
490
0
49
0
48 0
490
490
47
500
0
48
450
44 0
480
0
0
43
46
450
460
430
450
44
0
430
42
400
430
0
42
410
0
410
400
40
0
390
390
380
370
360
370
360
350
360
35 0
340
350
340
330
Sources: Massachusetts Geographic System, Property Survey, Studio .625
The development will be situated on a predominantly south-facing slope, providing for maximum solar gain and creating a warm site that is suited to ripening fruit and vegetables. This exposure enhances the comfort of outdoor areas in cooler months, though may necessitate shady refuge during the summer.
N
WI
NTE R
SUMM ER
S UN
SUN
Solar Orientation
one inch equals two hundred feet 0 100 200 400 600
Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 7 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
570
Protected Riverfront Areas
The Rivers Protection Act establishes a state policy for protecting the natural integrity of the Commonwealth's rivers and to establish open space along rivers. The riverfront area is measured 200 feet from each side of the river. The Rivers Protection Act identifies eight purposes: protection of private or public water supply, protection of groundwater, flood control, prevention of storm damage, prevention of pollution, protection of land containing shellfish, protection of wildlife habitat, and protection of fisheries.
0
56
570
56 0
55 56 0
0 54 0
550
0
53
0
54 0
55
0
54
52
0 0
0
53
51
500
520 53 0
0
52
0
51
50 0 52 0 50 0
51
0
490
0
49
0
48 0
490
490
47
500
0
48
Any proposed projects within the Riverfront must be reviewed by the local Conservation Commission through a permitting process. Two standards are specified in the Riverfront Protection Act. First, no permit is granted for work in the riverfront area that would result in a significant adverse impact on the riverfront area pertaining to the eight purposes mentioned above. Second, no permit is granted if there is a practicable and substantially equivalent economic alternative to the proposed project with less adverse impacts pertaining to the resource area.
450
44 0
480
0
0
43
46
450
460
44
0
430
42
400
430
0
42
410
0
Vince nt
430
Brook
450
410
400 40
0
390
390 380
370
360
370
360 350
360
35 0
340
350
340
330
Sources: Massachusetts Geographic Information System, Property Survey, New England Environmental, Studio .625
N
Protected riverfront areas provide wildlife shelter and food. The riverfront areas are also natural corridors for wildlife migration, and aesthetic retreats for Katywil residents. Currently the fields within the floodplain of the West Branch of the North River are hayed by a local farmer. If these fields are converted for crop production, the use of fertilizers and pesticides should be prohibited.
Protected Resource Areas Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 8 of 30
one inch equals two hundred feet 0 100 200 400 600 Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
570
Existing Apple Trees
0
56
570
56 0
55 56 0
0 54 0
550
0
53
0
54 0
55
0
54
52
0 0
0
53
51
500
520 53 0
0
52
0
51
50 0 52 0 50 0
51
0
490
0
49
0
48 0
490
490
47
500
0
48
450
44 0
480
0
0
43
46
450
460
430
450
44
0
430
42
400
430
0
42
410
0
410
400 40
0
390
390 380
370
360
370
360 350
360
35 0
340
350
340
330
Ea er mead w ot cl d ded eed d in inventoory ryy
Sources: Massachusetts Geographic Information System, Property Survey, Studio .625
N
Apple trees, marked by red circles above, are remnants of the former orchard located on the property. With pruning and care these 51 apple trees may still provide a harvest and a beautiful reminder of the site’s land use history. These trees should be protected during construction and incorporated into the designed landscape. Maintaining the trees through pruning will stimulate apple blossom production and eventual fruit development through pollination by bees on site.
Apple Trees Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 9 of 30
one inch equals two hundred feet
0
100
200
400
600
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Annual Sun/Shade Composite The surveyed portion of the property is used in this sun/shade analysis. The green represents vegetation masses and the proposed duplexes are placed in their proposed sites. The darker shadows represent longer periods of time an area is shaded throughout the year.
N
The open meadows provide solar gain throughout the year. Removal of a few trees may be required to ensure uninterrupted solar gain to the photovoltaic panels and the passive solar-designed duplexes during the winter months.
Oblique View Source: Studio .625
A. Spring and Fall Equinox March /September 21
B. Summer Solstice June 21 8 AM
N
Noon
4 PM
A. The open areas on the Katywil property provide at least six hours of solar gain during the spring and fall. This solar gain will beneďŹ t ripening fruit and plant growth during the early and late growing season.
B
8 AM
N
Noon
C. Winter Solstice December 21
4 PM
B. During the summer months with long days of solar gain, shade cover is recommended for human refuge from the heat. Gardens should be located in areas that provide full sun throughout the day. Most open spaces will provide at least eight hours of sunlight.
C. Due to the existing open meadows, six hours of solar gain is available during the winter months. This solar gain will beneďŹ t the passive solar duplexes and their photovoltaics during the coldest of winter days.
9 AM
N
Noon
3 PM
Sun/Shade Analysis Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 10 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
0
49
0
Height Limits of Vegetation 490
47
500
0 - 10’: Limit plants in this zone to perennials, ground covers, and small and medium shrubs.
0
48
10’ - 20’: Tall shrubs and smaller plants are approprite in this area. Avoid trees.
46 0
450
43 0
44
0
480
20’ - 40’: This area is appropriate for small trees that will be no taller than 20 to 40 feet when mature.
450
460
450
430 4
40’ - 80’: Medium-sized shade trees are appropriate in these areas as long as they will not block winter sun when mature.
44
0
430
42
400
0 430
0
In order to maintain solar access to homes throughout the year, new plantings should be planned to not shade south-facing windows. Height limits are based on the anticipated size of mature plants and the sun’s position on the Winter Solstice, when it is lowest in the sky.
0
42
410
410
400
40
0
390
390 380
370
360
370
360
350
360
0
35
340
350
340
one inch equals two hundred feet
0
100 330
200
400
N
Sources: Massachussetts Geographic Information System, Property Survey, Studio .625
un
f
le o g An
S The
The n o
tice s l r So 40’ e t Win
80’
600
oon N at
20’
10’
20’
40’
80’
160’
one inch equals 20 feet
0
10
20
40
60
Clearance for Solar Gain Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 11 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Samples Seven soil samples were collected from the property. The location of these samples are illustrated in the orthophotograph below. Soil samples A, B, D, E, F, and G underwent soil chemistry analysis. Sample C underwent a Soil Foodweb Analysis which identified and quantified beneficial bacteria and fungi. Results indicate soil nutrient deficiencies may require soil amendment for healthy growth of cultivated crops. The desired ranges within each graph represents the range of that nutrient or mineral in which healthy plant growth will occur. The full test results and Soil Foodweb recommendations are located in Appendix B.
Calcium levels correlate with pH levels. Samples with the highest calcium levels also have the highest pH. Sample E’was extracted from a conifer stand and the low pH is most likely caused by the decomposition of conifer needles.
Sandy soils contain large pore spaces which allows for easy percolation of water. This water will also leach out the vital nutrients, minerals, and organic matter within the soil. Portions of the property were used as pasture and evidence of plant species indicate portions were overgrazed. Soil samples B, C, D, F, and G were extracted from pasture land. Sample A was extracted from open land just south of a fertilized hayfield. Sample E was extracted from a two-year old clearing in the woods.
Overall, soil composition and nutrient cycling can be improved by amending with composted organic matter. To some extent, soil amendment can also help buffer against the low pH and improve the cation exchange capacity. However, a selection of drought and acidtolerant plants will improve plant performance and will develop a more sustainable garden.
The high quality of sample A may be explained by manure nutrients leaching from the upslope hayfield and depositing downslope. Another explanation may be that the soils have been undisturbed by tilling, overgrazing, or other farming practices
Soil Nutrients Soil pH
Desired Range
20
pH
NH 4 (ppm)
25
15 10 5 0
A
B
D
E
F
G
Soil Sample ID
% Organic Matter Within Soil Samples
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
% Organic Matter
NH 4 , Ammonium Within Soil Samples
Desired pH
A
B
D
E
F
8
A
B
6 5
D Range E Desired
F
G
Soil Sample ID
7
A
B
D
E
F
G
Soil Sample ID
4 3 2 1 0
A
G
B
D
E
F
G
Soil Sample ID
Soil Sample ID
Trace Minerals Soil Sample Locus
NO 3 , Nitrate Within Soil Samples
% Base Saturation of Calcium Within Soil Samples % Calcium (Ca)
30
NO3 (ppm)
Desired Range
25 20 15
A
10
G
5
80 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
A
0
A
B
D
E
F
B
G
D
E
F
G
Soil Sample ID
E
Soil Sample ID
C
B
% Base Saturation of Magnesium Within Soil Samples
D 16
Phosphorus Within Soil Samples 140 120 100
F
80 60
G
40
G
Desired Range
20 0
A
B
D
E
F
% Magnesium (Mg)
14
160
Phosphorus (ppm)
Desired Range
70
Desired Range
12 10 8 6 4 2
G
Soil Sample ID
G
0
A
B
D
E
F
G
Soil Sample ID
% Base Saturation of Potassium Within Soil Samples
% Base Saturation of Sodium Within Soil Samples % Sodium (Na)
% Potassium (K)
18 16 14
G
12 10 8 6
Desired Range
4
25 20 15 10 5
2
Desired Range
0
0
A
B
D
E
F
A
G
Soil Sample ID
Source: Massachusetts Geographic Information System
N
B
D
E
F
G
Soil Sample ID
Soil Composition (See Also Appendix B) Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 12 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Personal Space
Quiet Retreat
Paths
Native Edibles
Cultivated Plants
Private Gardens
Forest Gardens Community Garden
Natural Areas Forest
Community Space Community Building
Homes
Gathering Space
Chicken Coop
Meadows
Successional Edge
Community Green
Livestock Shelter
Domestic Animals Pasture
There are fifteen program elements that are key to providing a balanced community at Katywil. These fifteen program elements, indicated by colored circles, are grouped into five categories; personal space, community space, domesticated animals, cultivated plants, and natural areas. The colors in this diagram correlate to the colored elements in the conceptual plan. Program elements are arranged around the homes based on their relative frequency of use. The closer to the home an element is, the more frequently it is utilized. This arrangement should reflect element relationships so that the landscape supports activities throughout the Katywil community commons.
Concept Diagram: Element Relationships Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 13 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
570
Home Zone Private Garden and Patio
0
56
570
56 0
55 56 0
0 550
Community Zone 54 0
Meadows, Chicken Coop, Community Garden, Community Building, Community Green, Gathering Space, Forest Gardens, Paths
0 53
0
54 0
55
0
54
52
0 0
0
53
51
500
520 53 0
52
0 0
51
50 0 52 0 50 0
51
0
490 490
48 0
Edge Zone Meadows, Pasture, Livestock Shelter, Gathering Space, Community Green, Forest Gardens, Successional Edge, Native Edibles, Paths, Quiet Retreats, Forest
0
0 49
490
47
500
0
48
450
44 0
480
0
0
43
46
45 50 0
460
430 4
450
44
0
430
42
400
0 430
0
42
410
0
Local Environment
410
Forest, Quiet Retreat, Paths, Native Edibles
400 40
0
39 3 90
390 380
37 70 0
360
370
360 35 50 0
360
35 0
340
Natural Lands
350
Forest, Quiet Retreats, Paths
340
330
N The landscape is divided into five zones, originating at the homes and extending into the natural areas around the proposed community. The zones are defined by ease of access, defined by steep slopes and vegetation. These zones each have preferred uses based on distance from the homes and relative relationships illustrated in the Concept Diagram (Sheet 13). Zones of yellow are easily accessed areas immediately around the home and are suited for frequent use. Orange areas encompass the three regions of the community. These areas should provide for most of the active landscape uses on site. Green regions are an interface zone, where the different regions connect, or the developed area meets the natural landscape. These areas are ideal areas for open meadows and natural succession. The blue areas are largely forested. Their relationship to the community makes them well suited to local access trails or harvest of native edibles. The remote purple areas are steep and forested. These areas shoudl be managed for long-term forest integrity.
Land Use Zones Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 14 of 30
one inch equals two hundred feet 0 100 200 400 600 Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Immediately surrounding the duplexes, these gardens provide herbs and vegetables for easy and quick access.
1 570
PRIVATE GARDENS
6 0
56
570
56
Should be located within a large enough area to provide 13,000 sq. ft. of planting beds to supply food for the community.
0
55
2
56 0
0
7
550
COMMUNITY GARDEN
54 0
7
0
53
Forest gardens provide a diversified harvest of herbs, fruits, nuts, and greens. A forest garden community consists of ground cover, shrub layer, and forest canopy.
0
54 0
55
0
54
52
0
3
0
0
53
51
500
520 53 0
1
0 0
51
50 0
7
52 0 50 0
0
7
490
0 47
6
0
450
480
44 0
6
0
COMMUNITY BUILDING 0
49
500
48
46
1
0
1
6 42
1 3 4 5 1 3 430
430
0
430
1
450
COMMUNITY GREEN
400
Natural Areas include meadows, forest succession, forest edge, and pasture.
42
410
Community greens provide space for outdoor meetings and activities, which may include active and passive recreation.
5
450
460
44
Centrally located, the community building provides a meeting space for residents, root cellar for storage, space for community events and craft production, and a possible greenhouse addition for seed propagation.
4
48 0
5
0
490
490
51
FOREST GARDEN
43
52
0
410
400 40
0
1
6
390
390
NATURAL AREAS
380
370
360
370
2
360 350
6
360
7
3
35 0
340
350
Retreats provide secluded quiet areas for relaxation and contemplation in a natural environment.
RETREAT
1
340
330
5
2
Paths provide access to the land uses within the Katywil community and to the surrounding natural areas.
1 PATHS
Source: Massachusetts Geographic Information System, Property Survey, Studio .625
N
Locations of land uses were assigned by taking into consideration topography, the proximity to homes, and the relationships between the differing elements identified in the Concept Diagram. Some of these areas may serve multiple uses.
Conceptual Plan Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 15 of 30
one inch equals two hundred feet 0 100 200 400 600 Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
6
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
7
8
6
The proposed plan for the use and development of the Katywil community commons includes extensive perennial cultivation in forest gardens clustered around the homes and located centrally on a terraced garden next to the community building. A large vegetable garden provides a large, level, sunny area for residents to share work, food, and time while growing annual crops. Two community greens provide places for residents to gather or hold outdoor events. A barn in the east meadow shelters livestock that help manage meadows and lawns. Natural meadows and successional areas are maintained to preserve the biological richness of the site. Trails connect the community and give residents an opportunity to explore the natural world.
8 7
4 1
6
8 6 7
2
Terraced Garden Edible Forest Gardens Vegetable Gardens Community Green Barn Meadows Successional Zones Trails
2
2
2 1 8 2 7
7
2
6 3 1 8 2
6 13
14
5
N
Proposed Plan Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 16 of 30
one inch equals one hundred ďŹ fty feet 0 75 150 300 450 Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Terraced Garden
Forest Gardens
At the center of the community, natural stone terraces rise from a the community building to the upper road. The terraces accommodate trees, shrubs, ground cover, and vines as well as paths and stairs to facilitate movement through the neighborhood.
Islands of garden beds are home to a diverse mix of plants that provide food for the community, nutrients for the soil, and beneďŹ t to wildlife. Gardens are shaped to provide access to plants and are situated near the homes for easy harvest.
Vegetable Gardens
Successional Meadows
The community vegetable garden is in a relatively level, sunny location on the lower terrace. The shared garden allows for shared work and harvest while facilitating vegetable production on a larger scale. A shed and work area are located centrally, but do not shade the garden plots.
Natural areas at Katywil are managed to preserve their open character, wildlife beneďŹ ts, or production of forest products. Open meadows gradually transition to the forest edge and are periodically cleared or cut to maintain their role in the landscape.
Plan Summary Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 17 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Managed Successional Zones Meadows and successional areas must be managed to maintain their open character, wildlife value, and human use. From mown lawn to forest edge, a gradual transition provides a diversity of spaces, uses, and visual interest as well as ensuring adequate forage and refuge for wildlife. These areas are modeled after the stages of succession of old pasture to woodland.
1
2
3
4
5
1. Mown Lawn - Keep mown areas to a minimum to reduce maintenance and increase wildlife habitat. 2. Open Meadow - Maintain naturalized meadows by mowing or burning once a year in the late winter or early spring. Burning reduces buildup of dead vegetation, adds nutrients to the soil, rejuvenates plant growth, and helps prevent the spread of woody vegetation. 3. Access - Paths between commonly used areas can be mowed periodically to keep open for walking. 4. Pasture - An alternative to managing open areas naturally is to pasture goats and sheep to browse and graze.
6
7
6. Tree Nursery - At forest edges or in clustered groups within large meadows, allow tree saplings to mature. Coppice trees for use in garden structures, as ďŹ rewood, or in crafts and ďŹ ne carpentry. Coppicing is a traditional method of woodland management, by which young tree stems are cut down to a low level, or sometimes right down to the ground. 7. Forest Edge - Forest edges should function to protect tree trunks from sun scald and to take advantage of the extra sunlight not available under the canopy. Forest edges are excellent habitat for many species, and provide shelter and food. Edges should contain ground cover, shrubs, and trees to provide layers of cover.
5. Shrub Masses - Thickets and masses of shrubs provide food and habitat to wildlife. Maintain this balance of cover and open space by removing tree saplings in these areas and mowing open spaces once a year.
Meadows & Succession Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 18 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Elements of a Forest Garden The cultivated landscape of the community should be arranged in patches of plant uses that provide food for the community, forage and refuge for wildlife, and nutrients for the soil. These uses can be created through cultivated perennial forest gardens which replicate the multi-layered symbiotic ecosystems within forests. Plants requiring regular care or providing a harvest should be located nearer the homes and along pathways. The beauty and integrity of the site should be honored by developing forest gardens slowly, replacing invasive plants with cultivated ones as they are removed. A list of site appropriate herbs, shrubs, trees, and vines for forest gardens can be found in Appendix A.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8 9
10
11
12 13
14
1516
1. Hedgerows - Use a mix of tall, dense, and thorny shrubs
9. Vines - Whether on the ground, climbing on a built structure,
and small trees to delineate space, provide wildlife habitat, and discourage browsing.
or scrambling over trees and shrubs, vines can provide harvest, shade, and cover across the vertical layers of a forest garden.
2. Cane Fruits - Wild and cultivated cane fruits, such as
10. Existing Junipers - Junipers present in fields that are set
raspberries, are harvested from two-year-old growth. Alternate cutting of groups of plants each year to ensure a regular harvest and control the growth of the thickets.
aside to revert back to forest can provide a good nursery environment for young trees. These plants should especially be kept on steep slopes in order to prevent erosion.
3. Herbs & Greens - Culinary, tea, and medicinal herbs
11. Dynamic Accumulators - Here are grown deep-rooted
mix with perennial greens to consolidate areas that are frequently harvested and maintained.
cover crops that accumulate soil nutrients and trace minerals. These plants can also be harvested for biomass, including mulch or compost.
4. Insectary Plants - Plants that provide nectar sources for bees and beneficial insects support honey production at Katywil while encouraging natural predation of pest insects.
5. Nitrogen Fixers - Plants that have a symbiotic relationship with soil bacteria (which fix atmospheric nitrogen into usable plant nutrients) benefit the entire plant community by increasing soil fertility.
6. Swales - Shallow depressions established perpendicular to the slope of the land can help slow the flow of runoff and promote the infiltration of precipitation.
7. Fruit-Bearing Shrubs - A variety of fruit-bearing shrubs provide a harvest that can be eaten fresh or preserved.
8. Paths - Access throughout forest gardens should be well defined to reduce damage to plants and soil compaction. The tops of berms are well suited to this function while north-south oriented paths maximize solar gain for neighboring plants.
12. Old Apples - The Katywil site is rich with mature apple trees. With renovation and care, these heritage trees can once again become productive.
13. Mulch & Mushrooms - Layers of mulch are important for building healthy soil. Trees and shrubs should receive a woody mulch while herbaceous beds should be mulched with straw or fresh material. Mulch piles can double as mushroom production areas.
14. Native Edibles - Many Northeastern native plants can provide a low-maintenance harvest from areas kept in a largely natural state.
15. Ground Covers -Exposed soil invites weeds. Use ground covers to suppress unwanted plants in the gardens.
16. New Fruit & Nut Trees - Young trees should increase the diversity of the tree harvest on site and eventually replace the old trees which will decline in time.
Forest Gardens Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 19 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
z
The following plant lists were developed from an extensive list from Edible Forest Garden. These plant species are chosen for their preference or toleration of sandy acidic soils. Sandy soils such as the ones found on site, have little capability of retaining water. These plant species will prefer or tolerate the lack of water due to their drought tolerance, and will provide for a more sustainable forest garden. The following tables are organizedd by plant form.
Botanical Name
Common Name
Borago officinalis Chamaemelum nobile Chimaphila maculata Chrysogonum virginianum Houstonia caerulea
borage chamomile pipsissewa green and gold bluets prostrate bird's-foot trefoil 'plena' false lily-of-the-valley dwarf ginseng moss pink sheep sorrel yerba buena Labrador violet pussytoes pussytoes purple poppy-mallow pipsissewa bunchberry trout lily musk strawberry wild strawberry silverweed white clover rose verbena barren strawberry white tansy yarrow wild sarsaparilla fringed sagebrush Carpathian bellflower dwarf tickseed Maryland dittany woodland strawberry alpine strawberry garden strawberry orpine running club moss mountain sorrel mayapple stonecrop large-flowered comfrey bellwort speedwell chives garlic chives columbine balsamroot sunflower downy wood mint good King Henry hay-scented fern Robin's plantain wild geranium rattlesnake weed Virginia waterleaf wood lily lupine sweet cicely ground cherry Solomon's seal French sorrel round-leaved ragwort false Solomon's seal red clover golden alexanders New England aster chicory leafcup stinging nettle
Lotus cornniculatus cv. Maianthemum canadense Panax trifolius Phlox subulata Rumex acetosella Satureja douglasii Viola labradorica Antennaria dioica Antennaria plantaginifolia Callirhoe involucrata Chimaphila umbellata Cornus canadensis Erythronium americanum Fragaria moschata Fragaria virginiana Potentilla anserina Trifolium repens Verbena canadensis Waldsteinia fragarioides Achillea ptarmica Aralia nudicaulis Artemisia frigida Campanula carpatica Coreopsis auriculata Cunila origanoides Fragaria vesca Fragaria vesca alpina Fragaria x ananassa Hylotelephium telephium Lycopodium clavatum Oxyria digyna Podophyllum peltatum Sedum reflexum Symphytum grandiflorum Uvularia sessilifolia Veronica officinalis Allium schocnoprasum Allium tuberosum Aquilegia canadensis Balsamorhiza sagittata Blephilia ciliata Chenopodium bonus-henricus Dennstaedtia punctilobula Erigeron pulchellus Geranium maculatum Hieracium venosum Hydrophyllum virginianum Lilium philadelphicum Lupinus perennis Osmorhiza claytonii Physalis heterophylla Polygonatum biflorum Rumex acetosa Senecio obovatus Smilacina racemosa Trifolium pratense Zizia aurea Aster novae-angliae Cichorium intybus Smallanthus uvedalia Urtica dioica
Sun Form { { { {
annual herb prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate herb
{ {z z { { { {z { { { {z z { { { { { {z { { { { { { { { { { z { { z { { { { { { {z { { { z { { z { {z { {z { { { { {
prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb prostrate-small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-medium herb small-large herb small-large herb small-large herb small-large herb
ed g C ero an w s e H Fru er b its In & G se r ct een i a N ry s 2 F ix Pla Sw er nt s al es Fr ui tVi Bea ne r s ing D Sh yn ru am bs N i at c A iv cc e u G ro Edi mu un bl la to W d es rs ild Co ve lif e Fo rs od & /o rS he lte r
Full Sun: Plant prefers or tolerates total sunlight for at least six hours of the day. Part Shade: Dappled or thin shade all day, full sun for three hours followed by full shade for three hours, and so on. Full Shade: Plant prefers or tolerates complete shade almost all day, can grow in the understory of forests.
H
{
9 9
9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9
9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9 9
9
9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9
9 9 9 9
9
9
9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9
9
9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9
9
9 9
9 9 9
9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9
9 9
9 9 9
9 9 9
9 9 9
9
9
9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9
9 9 9
9 9 9
Source: Dave Jacke, Edible Forest Gardens, vol. 2, 2005.
Appendix A: Forest Garden Herb List Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 20 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
z
Full Sun: Plant prefers or tolerates total sunlight for at least six hours of the day. Part Shade: Dappled or thin shade all day, full sun for three hours followed by full shade for three hours, and so on. Full Shade: Plant prefers or tolerates complete shade almost all day, can grow in the understory of forests.
Botanical Name
Common Name
Achillea millefolium Aster divaricatus Baptisia tinctoria Bunias orientalis Bunlum bulbocastanum
yarrow white wood aster yellow wild indigo Turkish rocket earth chestnut
{ {z { { {
medium herb medium herb medium herb medium herb medium herb
Coreopsis verticillata Fritillaria camschatcensis Glycyrrhiza lepidota Malva alcea Malva moschata
thread-leaved coreopsis Kamchatka lily American licorice mallow musk mallow
{ { { { {
medium herb medium herb medium herb medium herb medium herb
9 9 9 9
Myrrhis odorata Pimpinella saxifraga Polygonum bistorta
sweet cicely burnet saxifrage bistort
{ { {z
medium herb medium herb medium herb
9
9 9 9
Zizia aptera Baptisia australis Desmodium canadense Hemerocallis fulva Hemerocallis lilio-asphodelus
heart-leaved alexanders wild blue indigo showy tick trefoil tawny daylily yellow daylily
{ { { { {
medium herb medium-large herb medium-large herb medium-large herb medium-large herb
9 9 9 9 9
Lomatium macrocarpum Monarda fistulosa Perideridia gairdneri Petasites japonicus Polygonatum biflorum var. commutatum Solidago odora Armoracia rusticana Arnoglossum atriplicifolia Asclepias syriaca Chasmanthium latifolium Helianthus decapetalus Lilium lancifolium Monarda didyma Symphytum officinale Helianthus x laetiflorus Heracleum sphondylium Levisticum officinale Lilium canadense Phytolacca americana Vernonia noveboracensis Alcea rosea Andropogon gerardii Aralia cordata Helianthus tuberosus Tripsacum dactyloides Rheum australe Rheum palmatum
large-fruited biscuit root wild bergamot yampa fuki
{ { {
medium-large herb medium-large herb medium-large herb medium-large herb
giant Solomon's seal sweet goldenrod horseradish pale Indian plantain milkweed northern sea oats thin-leaved sunflower tiger lily bee balm comfrey showy sunflower cow parsnip lovage Canada lily pokeweed New York ironweed hollyhock big bluestem udo Jerusalem artichoke eastern gamma grass Himalayan rhubarb turkey rhubarb
{ { z { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { {
medium-large herb medium-large herb large herb large herb large herb large herb large herb large herb large herb large herb large-very large herb large-very large herb large-very large herb large-very large herb large-very large herb large-very large herb very large herb very large herb very large herb very large herb very large herb very-large herb very-large herb
H
Sun Form
ed g C ero an w s e F H r er uit b s In & G se r ct een i ar s N y 2 F ix Pla Sw er nt s al es Fr ui tVi Bea ne r s ing D Sh yn ru am bs N i at c A iv cc e u G ro Edi mu un bl la to W d es rs ild Co ve lif e Fo rs od & /o rS he lte r
{
9
9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9
9
9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9
9
9 9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9
9 9
9
9
9 9
9 9 9
9 9
9 9 9
9 9 9
9
9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9 9
9
9 9 9
9
Source: Dave Jacke, Edible Forest Gardens, vol. 2, 2005.
Appendix A: Forest Garden Herb List, cont. Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 21 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
z
Botanical Name
Common Name
Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Dryas octopetala Epigaea repens Gaultheria procumbens Linnaea borealis
bearberry (kiniknik) mountain avens trailing arbutus wintergreen twinflower
Sun Form { { { z
Opuntia compressa Amorpha nana Aralia hispida Ceanothus americanus Gaylussacia baccata Genista tinctoria Mahonia repens
{ { { { { { {
Rhus aromatica cv. Rubus flagellaris Rumex scutatus Vaccinium angustifolium
prickly pear cactus fragrant false indigo bristly sarsaparilla New Jersey tea black huckleberry dyer's greenwood creeping mahonia fragrant sumac 'Growlow' prickly dewberry buckler-leaved sorrel lowbush blueberry
Rosmarinus officinalis
rosemary
Rosmarinus officinalis cv. Amelanchier stolonifera Aralia racemosa Caragana pygmaea Lonicera caerulea var. edulis Mahonia aquifolium Prunus pumila Ribes hirtellum Ribes missouriense Ribes nigrum Ribes silvestre Ribes uva-crispa Rosa rugosa Rubus allegheniensis
rosemary 'Arp' running juneberry spikenard pygmy pea shrub
small shrub { small shrub { small shrub { small shrub small-medium { shrub small-medium { shrub { medium shrub {z medium shrub { medium shrub
edible honeysuckle Oregan grape eastern dwarf cherry smooth gooseberry Missouri gooseberry black currant red currant gooseberry rugosa rose Allegheny blackberry
{ {z { { { { { { { {
medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub medium shrub
prostrate shrub prostrate shrub prostrate shrub prostrate shrub prostrate shrub prostrate-small shrub small shrub small shrub small shrub small shrub small shrub small shrub
ed ge ro C w an s e Fr ui H ts er b & G In re se en ct s ia ry N Pl 2 F an ix er ts Sw al es Fr ui t-B ea Vi rin ne g s Sh ru D yn bs am ic N A at cc iv um e Ed ul G ib at ro l or es un s d C W ov ild er lif s e Fo od & /o rS he lte
Full Sun: Plant prefers or tolerates total sunlight for at least six hours of the day. Part Shade: Dappled or thin shade all day, full sun for three hours followed by full shade for three hours, and so on. Full Shade: Plant prefers or tolerates complete shade almost all day, can grow in the understory of forests.
H
{
9 9
9
9
9 9
9
9
9
9
9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9
9
9
9
9 9
9 9 9
9
9 9
9
9
9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9
9
9
9 9
9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9 9
9 9
9
9
Rubus idaeus var. strigosus American red raspberry Rubus occidentalis black raspberry purple-flowering Rubus odoratus raspberry
{ {
medium shrub medium shrub
9 9
{
9
9
9
Amelanchier alnifolla Caragana frutex Cornus paniculata Corylus americana Eleagnus commutata Eleangnus multiflora Ilex glaba Lespedeza bicolor Myrica pensylvanica Quercus prinoides Ribes odoratum Robinia hispida Rosa setigera Shepherdia canadensis Vaccinium corymbosum Viburnum cassinoides
saskatoon Russian pea shrub gray dogwood American hazel silverberry goumi inkberry bush clover northern bayberry dwarf chinkapin oak clove currant bristly locust prairie rose Canadian buffaloberry highbush blueberry witherod viburnum
{ { { { { { { { { { { { { { { {
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9
Caragana arborescens
Siberian pea shrub
{
Castanea pumila
chinquapin
{
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
{
Robinia viscosa Alnus serrulata Aralia elata Corylus avellana
clammy locust smooth alder angelica tree European filbert
{ { { {
medium shrub medium-very large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large shrub large-very large shrub large-very large shrub large-very large shrub large-very large shrub very large shrub very large shrub very large shrub
Rhus copallina
winged sumac
{
Rhus hirta
staghorn sumac
{
9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9
9 9
9
9
9
9
9 9 9
9 9 9
9
9
9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9
9
9 9
9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9
9
9 9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9
9 9
9 9
9
9 9
9 9
9 9
extra large shrub 9
9
9
9
9
extra large shrub 9
9
9
9
9
Source: Dave Jacke, Edible Forest Gardens, vol. 2, 2005.
Appendix A: Forest Garden Shrub List Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 22 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
z
Full Sun: Plant prefers or tolerates total sunlight for at least six hours of the day. Part Shade: Dappled or thin shade all day, full sun for three hours followed by full shade for three hours, and so on. Full Shade: Plant prefers or tolerates complete shade almost all day, can grow in the understory of forests.
ed g C ero an w s e H Fru er b its In & G se r ct e e n s N iar y 2 F ix Pl Sw er an ts al e Fr s ui tVi Bea ne r s ing D Sh yn ru am bs N at ic A iv cc e u G E di mu ro un bl la to W d es rs ild Co ve lif e Fo rs od & /o rS he lte r
{
Trees Common Name
Sun Form
Mespilus germanica Prunus domestica var. institia Xanthoceras sorbifolium
medlar
{
damson plum yellowthorn
{ {
Crataegus punctata
dotted hawthorn
Maackia amurensis
Amur maackia
Malus baccata
Siberian crabapple
Malus ioensis
prairie crabapple
Prunus hortulana
hog plum
Sorbus aucuparia Castanea mollissima Cornus kousa Morus alba Sassafras albidum
rowan Chinese chestnut kousa dogwood white mulberry sassafras
Alnus incana
gray alder
Pinus koraiensis Betula lenta Diospyros virginiana Gleditsia triacanthos Quercus macrocarpa Robinia pseudoacacia
Korean pine black birch American persimmon honey locust bur oak black locust
H
Botanical Name
9
small tree
9 9
small tree small tree small-medium { tree small-medium {z tree small-medium { tree small-medium { tree small-medium { tree small-medium { tree { medium tree { medium tree { medium tree { medium tree medium-large { tree medium-large { tree { large tree { large tree { large tree { large tree { large tree
9
9
9 9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9 9
9 9 9
9
9
9 9 9 9 9 9
9
9
9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9
9 9
9
9
9 9
9
ed g C ero an w s e F H er rui ts b & In se Gre ct e N iar ns y 2 F ix Pla Sw er nt s al es Fr ui tVi Bea ne r s ing D Sh yn ru am bs N a t ic A iv cc e u G E di mu ro un bl la to W d es rs ild Co ve lif e Fo rs od & /o rS he lte r
9
9 9 9
9
9
Vines Botanical Name
Common Name
Amphicarpea bracteata Apios americana Apios fortunei Lathyrus latifolius Smilax herbacea Actinidia arguta Actinidia kolomikta Actinidia purpurea Schisandra chinensis Vitis labrusca and hybrids Wisteria floribunda Wisteria frutescens
hog peanut groundnut Fortune's groudnut everlasting pea carrion flower hardy kiwifruit super hardy kiwifruit purple hardy kiwifruit magnolia vine
{z { { { { { { { {
large vine large vine large vine large vine large vine high vine high vine high vine high vine
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
fox grape Japanese wisteria American wisteria
{ { {
high vine high vine high vine
9 9 9
H
Sun Form
9
9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9 9
9
9
9
9
9 9 9
9
9 9
9 9
Source: Dave Jacke, Edible Forest Gardens, vol. 2, 2005.
Appendix A: Forest Garden Tree & Vine List Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 23 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Chemistry Analysis s
Soil Foodweb New York, Inc. 555-7 Hallock Ave, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 USA Phone: (631) 474-8848 Fax: (631) 474-8847 e-mail: soilfoodwebny@aol.com
Sample #:
2625ch
Sampe ID:
A
Received:
pH and Buffer Index
Notes:
4/28/2006
pasture
10.0 9.0
7.43 6.5 5.55
Nitrogen (ppm)
8.0
NH4
NO3
7.0
21.3
27.3
6.0
M
M
SO4
Boron
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.0 4.0 pH
Buffer
Desired pH -
Plant Available - REAMS (ppm)
Page 2
Ca
Mg
K
Na
P
Fe
Mn
Cu
Zn
553
61
39
78.2
30
NR
NR
NR
NR
M
L
M
H
M
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent Soil Moisture
Percent Organic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g
23.3 15 - 50
6.8 5+
6.4 10+
2625ch
Desired Range
Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm) 0.0 <.4
Percent Base Saturation Mg 7.9% K 5.1% Na 10%
H 5.9%
Ca 71.1%
Desired Range
Ca
Mg
K
Na
65 - 75%
10 - 15%
2 - 7%
1 - 3%
Soil Food Web Interpretation The percentage of organic matter is good, but the cation exchange capacity is a bit low in soil sample A. Typically soils with high organic matter have better cation exchange capacity. Compost teas can help inoculate the microbes needed to further breakdown existing organic matter so better nutrient retention is achieved. High iron or aluminum may also be a factor. Good soil moisture content. The pH is low and can be increased with an application of dolomitic lime at 18-20 lbs/1000. Apply with or after compost to maximize retention of applied elements. Nitrogen levels are in good range to high. Routine compost tea applications will help retain excess plant nutrients. Humic acid should also be applied in low amounts to help tie up excess nutrients. Phosphorus and potassium are both in good range to high. Adjust the fertilizer schedule to include materials low in phosphorus and potassium. Soluble salts are low, which is good.
Appendix B: Soil Sample A Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 24 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Chemistry Analysis s
Soil Foodweb New York, Inc. 555-7 Hallock Ave, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 USA Phone: (631) 474-8848 Fax: (631) 474-8847 e-mail: soilfoodwebny@aol.com
Sample #:
2626ch
Sample ID:
B
Received:
pH and Buffer Index
Notes:
4/28/2006
pasture
10.0 9.0
7.46 6.5 5.65
Nitrogen (ppm)
8.0
NH4
NO3
7.0
11.3
21.3
6.0
L
M
SO4
Boron
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.0 4.0 pH
Buffer
Desired pH -
Plant Available - REAMS (ppm)
Page 2
Ca
Mg
K
Na
P
Fe
Mn
Cu
Zn
297
28
75
116.8
24
NR
NR
NR
NR
L
L
H
H
L
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent Soil Moisture
Percent Organic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g
Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm)
20.9 15 - 50
4.4 5+
5.3 10+
0.0 <.4
2626ch
Desired Range
Percent Base Saturation K 13.5% Na 21%
Mg 4.9%
H 7.7% Ca 53.1%
Desired Range
Ca
Mg
K
Na
65 - 75%
10 - 15%
2 - 7%
1 - 3%
Soil Foodweb Interpretation The percentage of organic matter and the cation exchange capacity are both low for soil sample B. Add compost or pelletized compost to increase the organic matter and cation exchange capacity. Apply a dusting of compost. The pH is low for perennials, and the calcium and magnesium both should be increased. Apply 18-20 lbs/1000 sq ft dolomitic lime, but be sure to apply with or after compost to maximize the retention of the elements and reduce leaching. Nitrogen levels are a bit low. Compost teas with good levels of predatory microbes will help make more nitrogen plant available. A source of organic nitrogen should be applied with compost teas. Fish hydrolysate or soy would be good. Fish hydrolysate is a good source of phosphorus which is low in the soil. Soluble salts are low, which is good.
Appendix B: Soil Sample B Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 25 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Foodweb, Inc.
Soil Foodweb Analysis
555-7 Hallock Ave, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 USA Phone: (631) 474-8848 Fax: (631) 474-8847 e-mail: soilfoodwebny@aol.com
Organism Biomass Data Sample Unique Dry Weight # ID of 1 gram Fresh Material 5619 C 0.84 In good range, but on the dry side.
Plants: Perennials Sample Received: 4/29/2006 Report Sent: 5/11/06 Active Bacterial Biomass (μg/g) 22.3
Total Bacterial Biomass (μg/g) 299
Active Fungal Biomass (μg/g) 16.8
Total Fungal Biomass (μg/g) 378
Very good bacterial activity.
Good total bacterial biomass.
In good range.
Excellent total fungal biomass.
Hyphal Diameter (μm) 2.5
Total Percent Nematode Mycorrhizal Protozoa Numbers/g Numbers Colonization Flagellates Amoebae Ciliates #/g of Root NR NR NR NR NR
Fungal community Fungi and bacteria are both is more growing rapidly and will be typical of retaining nutrients. Compost or turfgrass tea applications will provide soils than provide a source of inoculum perennial soils. of protozoa and nematodes Inoculate to cycle nutrients. highly beneficial species with compost tea. Desired 0.45 15 100 15 100 (A) 10000 + 10000 + 50 20 Range 0.85 25 300 25 300 100 30 (A) Hyphal diameter of 2.0 indicates mostly actinobacteria hyphae, 2.5 indicates community is mainly ascomycete, typical soil fungi for grasslands, diameters of 3.0 or higher indicate community is dominated by highly beneficial fungi, a Basidiomycete community. Season, moisture, soil and organic matter must be considered in determining optimal foodweb structure. If sample information, such as pesticide, fertilizer, tillage, irrigation are not included on the submission form, sender's locale is used. One report is sent to the mailing address on the submission form. All submissions receive free 15 minute consultation, call 1-631-474-8848
Bold Means Low
40% 80%
05619, Soil Type: Sand, low organic matter. Irrigated: None. Plant: Perennials.
Organism Ratios Sample #
Unique ID
5619
C
Total Fungal To Total Bacterial Biomass 1.26
Active to Total Fungal Biomass
Active to Total Bacterial Biomass
0.04
0.07
Good F to B ratio for perennials. A Compost tea drench should be applied in the spring to inoculate predators needed to cycle nutrients. Apply 3-5 gal/1000 sq ft of tea with 1/2 cup/1000 each of fish hydrolysate and humic acid. Repeat the tea in early and mid-summer, but increase the fish and humic acid (double) on these apps. *(1)
Fair amount of the fungi present are active.
Good bacterial activity.
As an option a long term source of organic N such as feather meal can be used with tea in early summer. *(2)
Active Fungal to Active Bacterial Biomass 0.75
Plant Available Root-Feeding N Supply Nematode from Predators Presence (lbs/acre) NR NR
The soil is getting more bacterial through the spring. The humic acid will keep the activity balanced.
Desired *(2) *(3) *(4) *(5) Range (1) Brassica: 0.2-0.5; Row crops: 0.6 to 1.2; Early successional grass: 0.5-0.75; Late successional grass: 0.8 to 1.5; Berries, shrubs, vines: 2-5; Deciduous Trees: 5-10; Conifer: 10-100. (2) Warm spring, early summer: 0.25 to 0.95; Early spring, late winter & mid-summer: 0.10 to 0.15; Fall rain: 0.15 to 0.20; Drought/frozen soil/heavy metal/many pesticides: 0.05 or lower. Values greater than indicated mean the organisms are recovering from a negative impact. Values lower mean organisms are not recovering and help is needed, typically addition of their food resource is required. (3) Generally 1:1 results in good soil aggregate structure in crop soil; 2 to 5 for deciduous trees; 5 for conifers. Values above 1:1 mean soil pH may be decreasing, values less than 1:1 means pH increasing. Anaerobic conditions generally will result in extremely low soil pH. (4) Based on release of N from protozoan and nematode consumption of bacteria and fungi (see Ingham et al. 1985). Often protozoa and nematodes compete for food resources. When one is high, the other may be low. Also, if predator numbers are high, the prey may have low numbers. (5) Identification to genus.
Appendix B: Soil Sample C Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 26 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Chemistry Analysis s
Soil Foodweb New York, Inc. 555-7 Hallock Ave, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 USA Phone: (631) 474-8848 Fax: (631) 474-8847 e-mail: soilfoodwebny@aol.com
Sample #:
2627ch
Sample ID:
D
Received:
pH and Buffer Index
Notes:
4/28/2006
pasture
10.0 9.0
7.47 6.5
Nitrogen (ppm)
8.0
NH4
NO3
7.0
12.3
23.0
6.0
L
M
SO4
Boron
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.25 5.0 4.0 pH
Buffer
Desired pH -
Plant Available - REAMS (ppm)
Page 2
Ca
Mg
K
Na
P
Fe
Mn
Cu
Zn
388
21
21
61.0
61
NR
NR
NR
NR
M
L
M
H
H
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent Soil Moisture
Percent Organic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g
15 - 50
5+
10+
2627ch
Desired Range
Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm) <.4
Percent Base Saturation Mg K 4.0% 4.0% Na 11%
H 7.9%
Ca 72.7%
Desired Range
Ca
Mg
K
Na
65 - 75%
10 - 15%
2 - 7%
1 - 3%
Soil Foodweb Interpretation Good soil moisture content, and percentage of organic matter in soil sample D. The way to increase the cation exchange capacity is by boosting the organic matter with a compost application. Apply 10-15 lbs/1000 sq ft compost. The pH is low and can be increased with an application of dolomitic lime at 18-20 lbs/1000. Apply with or after compost to maximize retention of applied elements. Nitrogen levels are low, and can be boosted with ďŹ sh or soy added to teas. A long term source of organic nitrogen such as feather meal can be used in early summer to be made available slowly by microbes during the summer. Phosphorus and potassium are both in good range to high. Adjust the fertilizer schedule to include materials low in phosphorus and potassium. Soluble salts are low, which is good.
Appendix B: Soil Sample D Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 27 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Chemistry Analysis s
Soil Foodweb New York, Inc. 555-7 Hallock Ave, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 USA Phone: (631) 474-8848 Fax: (631) 474-8847 e-mail: soilfoodwebny@aol.com
Sample #:
2628ch
Sampe ID:
E
Received:
pH and Buffer Index
Notes:
4/28/2006
recently cleared forest
10.0 9.0
7.2
6.5
4.38
Nitrogen (ppm)
8.0
NH4
NO3
7.0
23.6
20.3
6.0
M
M
SO4
Boron
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.0 4.0
pH
Buffer
Desired pH -
Plant Available - REAMS (ppm)
Page 2
Ca
Mg
K
Na
P
Fe
Mn
Cu
Zn
290
24
89
108
6
NR
NR
NR
NR
H
M
M
NR
VH
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent Soil Moisture
Percent Organic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g
27.2 15 - 50
6.9 5+
6.4 10+
2628ch
Desired Range
Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm) 0.0 <.4
Percent Base Saturation K 15.4%
Na 19%
Mg 4.2% H 11.1%
Ca 50.5%
Desired Range
Ca
Mg
K
Na
65 - 75%
10 - 15%
2 - 7%
1 - 3%
Soil Foodweb Interpretation The percentage of organic matter is good, but the cation exchange capacity is a bit low in soil sample E. Typically soils with high organic matter have better cation exchange capacity. Compost teas can help inoculate the microbes needed to further breakdown existing organic matter so better nutrient retention is achieved. High iron or aluminum may also be a factor. Good soil moisture content. The pH is low and both the calcium and magnesium need to be increased. Apply dolomitic lime at 27-30 lbs/1000 sq ft. Apply with or after a dusting of compost to help maximize the retention of the elements. Repeat the lime in the fall. Nitrogen levels are in good range to high. Routine compost tea applications will help retain excess plant nutrients. Humic acid should also be applied in low amounts to help tie up excess nutrients. Soluble salts are low, which is good.
Appendix B: Soil Sample E Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 28 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Chemistry Analysis s
Soil Foodweb New York, Inc. 555-7 Hallock Ave, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 USA Phone: (631) 474-8848 Fax: (631) 474-8847 e-mail: soilfoodwebny@aol.com
Sample #:
2629ch
Sampe ID:
F
Received:
pH and Buffer Index
Notes:
4/28/2006
pasture
10.0 9.0
7.45 6.5 5.71
Nitrogen (ppm)
8.0
NH4
NO3
7.0
6.0
19.5
6.0
L
L
SO4
Boron
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.0 4.0 pH
Buffer
Desired pH -
Plant Available - REAMS (ppm)
Page 2
Ca
Mg
K
Na
P
Fe
Mn
Cu
Zn
637
14
79
100.6
19
NR
NR
NR
NR
M
L
H
H
L
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent Soil Moisture
Percent Organic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g
Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm)
24.1 15 - 50
6.1 5+
6.3 10+
0.0 <.4
2629ch
Desired Range
Percent Base Saturation Mg 1.6%
K 9.0%
Na 12%
H 5.0%
Ca 72.9%
Desired Range
Ca
Mg
K
Na
65 - 75%
10 - 15%
2 - 7%
1 - 3%
Soil Foodweb Interpretation The percentage of organic matter is good, but the cation exchange capacity is a bit low in soil sample F. Typically soils with high organic matter have better cation exchange capacity. Compost teas can help inoculate the microbes needed to further breakdown existing organic matter so better nutrient retention is achieved. High iron or aluminum may also be a factor. Good soil moisture content. The pH is low and can be increased with an application of dolomitic lime at 18-20 lbs/1000. Nitrogen levels are low, and can be boosted with ďŹ sh or soy added to teas. Fish hydrolysate is a good source of phosphorus which is low in the soil. A long term source of organic nitrogen such as feather meal can be used in early summer to be made available slowly by microbes during the summer.
Appendix B: Soil Sample F Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 29 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006
Soil Chemistry Analysis s
Soil Foodweb New York, Inc. 555-7 Hallock Ave, Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 USA Phone: (631) 474-8848 Fax: (631) 474-8847 e-mail: soilfoodwebny@aol.com
Sample #:
pH and Buffer Index
2630ch
Sampe ID:
G
Received:
4/28/2006
Notes:
pasture
10.0 9.0
7.48 6.5 5.46
Nitrogen (ppm)
8.0
NH4
NO3
7.0
9.5
25.2
6.0
L
M
SO4
Boron
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.0 4.0 pH
Buffer
Desired pH -
Plant Available - REAMS (ppm)
Page 2
Ca
Mg
K
Na
P
Fe
Mn
Cu
Zn
579
38
47
99.6
140
NR
NR
NR
NR
M
L
M
H
H
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent Soil Moisture
Percent Organic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g
Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm)
22.5 15 - 50
4.6 5+
6.1 10+
0.1 <.4
2630ch
Desired Range
Percent Base Saturation Mg 4.7% K 5.8% Na 12%
Ca 71.9%
Desired Range
H 5.2%
Ca
Mg
K
Na
65 - 75%
10 - 15%
2 - 7%
1 - 3%
Soil Foodweb Interpretation The percentage of organic matter and the cation exchange capacity are both low in soil sample G. Add compost or pelletized compost to increase the organic matter and cation exchange capacity. Apply 10-15 lbs/1000 sq ft compost. The pH is low and can be increased with an application of dolomitic lime at18-20 lbs/1000. Apply with or after compost to maximize retention of applied elements. Nitrogen levels are low, and can be boosted with ďŹ sh or soy added to teas. A long term source of organic nitrogen such as feather meal can be used in earlysummer to be made available slowly by microbes during the summer. Phosphorus and potassium are both in good range to high. Adjust the fertilizer schedule to include materials low in phosphorus and potassium. Soluble salts are low, which is good.
Appendix B: Soil Sample G Katywil Community Commons Master Plan Sheet 30 of 30
Conway School of Landscape Design Danny Stratten & Ian Hodgdon June 2006