Kimmy El-Dash Portfolio
ZEDfactory & Zero Bills Home Specification & Construction system ZEDfactory Europe Ltd.
04
Jackson House New build 2 Storey dwelling ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. Brighton l 2017-18
06
Barnard Houses Victorian house conversion & 2 semi ZBH ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. Sidcup, London l 2017-18
12
Adventist School
Concept design ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. Sao Paulo, Brazil l 2016
18
ZED PODs
Micro-homes above car parks ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. United Kingdom l 2016
22
NS 2 BED Demand (kWh/m2) Yearly Cost of space heating (£0.176p kW)
ES 2 Bed
Elderly unit
1 Bed unit
9.6
11.6
7.6
6.4
£119.00
£141.00
£48.00
£38.00
Intermittent heat (for occupied hours);Temperature settings: Living room temperatures @20C & Bedrooms @18C
Fuel Poverty: Going beyond efficiency The role of architect and occupant
Living room Average daily resultant temperature Comparison (1920's x CfSH 4 x Proposed Design)
M. Arch Thesis project Belfast, N. Ireland l 2015
35.0
1000.0 900.0
30.0
800.0
25.0
600.0
15.0
500.0 400.0
10.0
300.0
5.0
Daily average radiation (Wh/m²)
Temperature (°C)
700.0 20.0
200.0
0.0
100.0
-5.0
Holiday Home
0.0
Daily Av of global horizontal radiation [Wh/m2]
Daily Av of diffuse horizontal radiation [Wh/m2]
Daily Av of 1920 S LivDin Resultant Temp (C)
Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C)
Comfort Band (C)
30
Average of External Temperature (C) Daily Av of 2012 Living Resultant Temp (C)
Fd Degree Architectural technology Dunmurry, N. Ireland l 2012
42
Central Library Extension
Fd Degree Architectural technology Belfast, N. Ireland l 2011
48
Residential Scheme - Jundiai Graduation Project Jundiai, Brazil l 2001
52
3
ZEDfactory has a standard building specification which has been coupled with their own construction method, developed into the Zero Bills Home (ZBH) system. The general build-up is insulated timber frame which is then ‘wrapped’ with woodfibre, creating breathable, well insulated fabric. The airtightness line is formed in between these 2 layers, with a self adhesive breathable airtight membrane. The Uvalues achieved are in the range of 0.12W/m2K. The build up is used for walls and roofs.
Render l Plasterboard 145mm Studs packed with mineral wool OSB sheathing Self-adhesive Breathable airtightness membrane 160mm Wood fibre Mesh + Render
Timber cladding l
ZF standard specification
This standard specification can be combined with especially designed steel positioning-beams that allow the studs, joists and rafters to be quickly positioned on site. This is the Zero Bills Homes system.
+ Breather membrane Fixing battens (fixed through to studs)
The materials, timber and mineral wool are sourced from local merchants. A layer of OSB, covered with the airtightness membrane forms ‘a red box’: ‘if it’s not red, it’s not airtight’ (making the airtightness line easily visible, ensuring its continuity. to further improve performance, the woodfibre insulation wraps the ‘red box’, reducing cold bridging thus reducing Psi values.
Cladding (ventilated behind)
BIPV roof l
ZF standard specification
+ Photo Voltaic panels
ZEDfactory - specification 4
ZF standard specification
ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. England, UK l
ZF standard specification l
ZEDfactory Specification & Construction system
l The ZBH system
ZF standard specification
+ Steel stud/joist locator
ZBH
Hastings l 2017
ZBH system 5
Being a half basement has benefits when it comes to thermal performance, however daylighting had to be carefully considered. Openings were positioned to allow for borrowed light in the lower floor, reducing dependency on artificial light. All rooms on the lower floor have high level openings, which will provide deep penetrating natural light and ventilation. For security reasons these openings can be ‘locked’ to a small opening position, however the option to fully open them is also available. The 120m2 house is being detailed to be very energy efficient with a healthy indoor environment, through a fabric first approach. The careful detailing ensures a low level of air tightness, low U values and reduced cold bridging. This is being coupled with an airto-air/water system that will provide the space heating and hot water, powered by a roof integrated PV system. Furthermore, as much as possible, natural materials are carefully selected to create a breathable envelope contributing to the indoor air quality.
The Project 6
Concept
l Rear garden development consisting of a 2 storey dwelling. The scheme is located in Brighton, in a conservation area, facing Preston Park. In order to ‘discreetly’ fit into the existing surroundings, it was necessary to ‘hide’ the dwelling as much as possible. The solution was to sink the dwelling. Furthermore, the roof was pitched,taking advantage of the orientation, with the eaves peaking out from behind the existing dwelling in front.
Main Road l
Original application
l
ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. Brighton l 2017-18
Site layout
Jackson House New build 2 Storey dwelling
Rear Garden l
Concealing the dwelling
Semi - Basement
Approved Design
Site Plan l
Existing house Green roof PV
Park
Park Views Terraces
Sire Section l
l Plans
Access & Lower levels l
Upper level l
5
2
1
6
7 11
8
3
4 3 Lobby - Reduces losses from opening the doors Glazing - Daylighting to lower floor
5
1
9
1 10 Buffer space - (outside thermal envelope) quality space Sunken terraces - Daylight and natural ventilation - Views of the garden
Key: 1l 2l 3l 4l 5l 6l
Bedroom Study Bathroom Lobby Sunken Terrace Kitchen
7l Dining 8l WC 9l Living 10l Buffer Space 11l Terrace
Thermal envelope
Layout 7
l Sections
Short section l
Long section l High level ventilation
Diffused daylighting
Natural ventilation
Solar loft reduces heat losses
PV roof
Entrance platform/Lobby
Upper Floor
Upper Floor
Lower Floor Lower Floor Semi Basement
l Daylighting l Entrance platform - glazed elements -Borrowed light for lower floor Openings (at high level) in all lower floor rooms allowing for natural daylight
Natural ventilation l Openings: -Tilt & turn window. Allows for natural ventilation, whilst still being safe
Sections 8
Thermal performance
Basement
l
Semi Basement
Heat Losses l Solar loft (Buffer space) -Reduces heat losses -Warmer ‘external’ area during cooler period, with views of the park -All elevations have openings to encourage cross ventilation during the warmer months Lobby - Enclosed lobby for reduction of heat loss directly to the outside Semi - Basement - Ground at ‘constant temperature’ throughout the year.
l Sunken Terraces
Detail l - Daylight and natural ventilation - Views of the garden
Retaining structure: Gabion baskets
Deck with slight camber encouraging water runoff + 5mm gap between boards Adjustable pedestals, raising the decking Gabion mattress for water runoff
Interior visualization l
Exterior visualization l
Detail 9
Heco-Topix Therm screw: Fixes battens to studs through the insulation, reducing thermal bridges
Section l
Timber frame
ICF
(Insulated Concrete Form)
Detail 10
Stud fixing thread
Corner Detail l Timber fixing thread
l ZF standard specification Wall - Cladding
Plan l
l Solar Loft
ZBH at the BREl
Visualization 11
l Site
Barnard Houses Victorian house conversion & 2 semi ZBH ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. Sidcup, London l 2017-18
Granvil
le Rd
Existing Victorian House
2No ZBH
Hatherl
ey Rd
The proposal is for the construction of 2N° energy efficient dwellings in the rear garden of an existing Victorian house, which will in turn be converted into 5 flats. The sale of the main house, will fund the pair of semi-detached houses. The 2 new builds are based on one of the standard Zero Bills Homes (ZBH); however I have amended them to suit the client’s requirements and site constraints.
The neighbouring buildings are quite diverse both in height and in finishings. There are apartment blocks, terraced housing, semi-detached and detached dwellings, varying between 2 and 4 storeys. This diversity also extends to the building materials used, both in texture and in colour. Bricks (with wide range of colours), render, PVC, timber and clay tiles are mixed, creating a patchwork effect, which is replicated with the timber cladding in the proposed units.
The Project 12
Proposal
The dwellings are proposed to be accessed via Granville road, and as such follow the existing urban tissue. Keeping in character with the local area, the proposed dwellings are recessed back on the plot, which will allow for a hard and soft landscaped front garden area from where there is independent, safe and secure access to the garage, rear garden and the dwellings themselves. The scheme has recently been submitted to the local planning authority for approval.
l
The dwellings are very similar, with differences being present only on the ground floor. The East house has an additional area that can be used as a home office, whilst the West one has an utility room. The first and second floors are identical.
Victorian House
5n0 flats
2n0 ZBH
l Conversion
FLAT 3
FLAT 4 (duplex)
FLAT 1
FLAT 2
FLAT 4 (duplex)
FLAT 5 (duplex)
FLAT 5 (duplex)
Ground floor l
First floor l
Second floor l
Conversion Layout 13
l Site analysis (ZBH)
3 Storey apartment block
In-curtilage parking
2 storey dwelling, with single storey garage
Commercial premises
No openings
20 Hatherley road
Commercial premises
Redu c
ed h
eigh
t
Distance
Dwellings
Urban ti
ssue alig
nment
PVs to face south optimizing performance Reduced height in proximity of existing building. Existing urban tissue line to be maintained
ZBH - Site Analysis 14
Minimum openings/ translucent openings
Proposed dwelling to be recessed, Existing Victorian House allowing for in-curtilage parking
3 Storey Apartment block
l Site
Key: 1l 2l 3l 4l 5l 6l
Independent cycle & pedestrian access Single storey (daylight neighbouring)
Kitchen / dining Garage Home office/utility Kitchen Bedrooms Solar loft
Small opening (privacy & natural ventilation) Integrated PVs main building m/ s
5 .0 0 + 4 .5 0 4 .0 0 3 .5 0 3 .0 0 2 .5 0 2 .0 0 1 .5 0 1 .0 0 0 .5 0
Plans
l
0 .0 0
Ground l
First l Protected access
Second l Design helping reduce potential noise issues
1
5 5 2
3
4 5
6
Layout 15
Front l
Green Roof
Visualisations 16
Natural ventilation & privacy
Sheltered access (wind and rain sheltered)
Independent access (side alley)
Rear l
Green Roof
Natural ventilation & privacy
Solar loft
BIPVs
Cycle store (external convenient access)
Visualisations 17
l
Site analysis l
Através da análise do terreno foram identificadas uma série de questões, que vieram a influenciar o projeto.
1
Os ventos predominantes no verão tem a direção de Sudeste a Noroeste e durante o inverno do Leste a Oeste.
©2017 ZEDfactory Europe Ltd.
Administrative block, auditorium, cafeteria, sports centre and large lecture hall are placed at the top of the hill, all connected through a network of steps and ramps. Class rooms are located near the main entrance (in the west) in the steepest part of the site. They will be the focus for the purposes of this portfolio.
Proposal 18
Co s ta
iro
R. W ald
em ar
da
ont e R. M nte
es irel Me
R. V itor
ava iC Vegetação existente
Cooler period prevailing winds
Vegetação existente
Condominio fechado
l
Summer prevailing winds
Concept
Acessos The site is the ‘left-over’ land from the development of an upper class gated community to the south. Verão - VentoTo Predominante (O) the north, at the bottom of the hill, there is a lower Inverno - Vento Predominante (NE) class neighbourhood. The site presents difficulties in relation to the steep levels involved. The proposal 6 attempts to reduce a minimum the soil movement, with the proposed buildings being essentially on stilts.
R. D
The architectural concept is based on the development of the interaction between the children and the beautiful nature surrounding them. In Terreno order to achieve this, the different functions of the school will be spread-out through the site Campo instead de futebol utilizado pela comunidade of concentrated in one or 2 buildings. This will Sabesp Desativada establish a continuous circulation throughout the whole site,where everyone will be interacting with Vistas - vegetação nature and each other. Cume do morro
Vegetaca o
existente
The school’s ethos is to develop the links between the children and their surroundings creating an understanding and appreciation of the natural environment.
A.M.
nte
base para a implantação dos diferentes edifícios que formam a Escola Parque Adventista.
Bairro residencial
P.M.
lca
Um campo de futebol comunitário foi identificado a Noroeste do terreno e é muito utilizado pela comunidade. Na área mais alta
e central do terreno existe uma estação de distribuição de água The site is located in the outskirts of Sao Paulo. The desativada, SABESP. project consists of a primary and secondary school O terreno, e seu entorno, é coberto por vegetação e esta localizado em uma área com topografia acentuada. Essa combinação foi determinante na definição do partido arquitetônico, servindo como for the ‘Escola Adventista’,
R. V ice
yington
Análise do Contexto
O terreno se encontra entre o bairro residencial Colinas da Anhanguera (ao norte) e o condomínio residencial Itahyê II (ao Sul). A principal avenida de acesso é a Av Perola Byington, localizada a Oeste do terreno, mas há outros acessos pelo bairro.
cume
2
Av. Perola B
Concept design ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. Sao Paulo, Brazil l 2016
Análise do Terreno
Site analysis
Adventist School
1
Terreno
iro
Auditorium
Administrative block
Complexo esportivo
70m 2min
105m 3min
140m 4min
175m 5min
Complexo esportivo Edifício Ponte
Sports Complex
350m 10min
4
1
Ensino Médio
Farm
Ensino Fundamental Infantil Fazendinha Circulação Campo de Futebol Espaço arco-iris
l
15
Site distribution
3
Co s ta da ar em
Vit R.
3
5
Auditório / 3° ano
Football pitch Fazendinha
2
Wa ld
35m 1min
Refeitório
©2017 ZEDfactory Europe Ltd.
Auditório
Bloco administrativo
R.
te lca n Ca va
Administração
Campo Futebol
R.
Di
Volumetria–Usos
Residential area
Class rooms
Core building
or Me ire les
Terreno Salas de aula
on te
R. Waldemar da Costa e R. Iolanda Mahali:
.M
R. Vicente do Rego Monteiro:
5
eR
R. Vitor Meireles:
4
ent
3
Vic
R. Di Cavalcanti:
R.
Av Pérola Byington:
2
Proposta Projectual
Av. Perola Byington
l
Support building
1
li
Site distribution
Class Rooms
a Mahha
Suporte
2
R. Ioland
Distancia a pé
Salas de aula
Sports complex Small Farm
Auditorium Administration Core building
Early years Primary Secondary
19
l Class Room Unit Analysis & Strategy
Morning l
Cooler period prevailing winds
Daylight Summer prevailing winds
Internal gains Afternoon l
Comfort l Cooler period prevailing winds
Attenuate Heat Gains : Shading (avoid solar gains) Thermal mass (control internal gains) Natural Ventilation Daylighting: Openings (glare potential)
Daylight Summer prevailing winds
Internal gains
Analysis 20
l Class Room Unit Analysis & Strategy
Parametric modelling l
Concept l
CFD l Impact of the topography on prevailing winds Room ventilation (positioning of openings to encourage cross ventilation) Daylighting l Suitable daylight standards requirement. Avoid glare Thermal l General shading strategies & Thermal mass Creation of a comfortable environment throughout the academic year for both morning and afternoon classes
Circulation
Class room
Shading device
Heat gain attenuation strategy l
South/East openings l
Green roofs with suitable plants species PVs as a ‘second skin’ at appropriate angles
Louvred glazing Daylight &ventilation
Diffused Daylight l
(South - avoiding glare)
Circulation l Buffer space protects class rooms from direct solar radiation: Concrete roof cantilevering out to cover circulation space Cobogo (shading the circulation space, whilst allowing for views and natural daylight
Concept 21
ZED PODs
nt
Micro-homes above car parks ZEDfactory Europe Ltd. United Kingdom l 2016
WHO is the ZEDpod for? The target is young professionals that need to save-up in order to get on the property market; Key workers; WHY ZEDpod? No need for land acquisition, contributing to the lower cost of the units; Speed of construction as the ZEDpods are assembled in a factory and taken to site on the back of a lorry and placed over the car parking area with a forklift.
Re
WHAT is the ZEDpod? Low cost energy efficient starter (micro) home within city boundaries, over existing areas of parking or garages, preferably close to transport links
? £££
£
Concept 22
• Area with 47 derelict garages
Elmhurst - Batheaston
• Unsightly
• Area used by parents to drop-off children attending local school
Site 1 - Derelict garages
l
• Area with 47 derelict garages
• Informal parking causing issues with traffic flow Existing site l
• Area used by parents to drop-off children attending local school
Garage Image
• Informal parking Acausing issues with traffic flow Playground
Garage Image
Batheaston School
Skate board Area
Playground
B
A
Multi-use Sport court
Skate board Area Football pitch Garage Image
Site Analysis
B
Multi-use Sport court
Site Analysis
Site Analysis Site Analysis
Batheaston School
w www.zedpods.com
Batheaston School w www.zedfactory.com
Batheaston School
A Derelict garages l
t 020 8404 1380
f 020 8404 2309
e info@zedpods.com
Curo land boundary
t 020 8404 1380
f 020 8404 2309
e info@zedpods.com
w www.zedpods.com
f 020 8404 2309
w www.zedfactory.com
St Catherines Brook
Additional land boundary
Informal car parking (Approx.20 s
Informal car parking (Approx.20 spaces) 47 No Existing Garages 47 No Existing Garages
Lands owned by Curo
Additional land boundary
Informal car parking (Approx.20 spaces)
Lands owned by Curo
Traffic flow
Informal car parking (Approx.20 spaces)
47 No Existing Garages
Traffic flow
Lands owned by Curo
t 020 8404 1380
f 020 8404 2309
Lands owned by Curo
w www.zedfactory.com
e info@zedpods.com
w www.zedpods.com
Traffic flow
e info@zedpods.com
www.zedpods.com Pedestrianw Route
w www.zedfactory.com
14
Pedestrian Route
w www.zedpods.com w www.zedfactory.com Pedestrian Route
w www.zedpods.com
w www.zedfactory.com
Concept applied - Site 1
w www.zedfactory.com
Pedestrian Route
Traffic flow t 020 8404 1380
Additional land boundary
Additional land boundary
f 020 8404 2309 e finfo@zedpods.com t 020 8404 1380 020 8404 2309 e info@zedpods.com t 020 8404 1380 47 No Existing Garages
w www.zedpods.com
Curo land boundary
Curo land boundary
Curo land boundary St Catherines Brook
13
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
St Catherines Brook
w www.zedfactory.com
B
13
14
23
14
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
e info@zedpods.com
St Catherines Brook
Football pitch f 020 8404 2309
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
t 020 8404 1380
St Catherines Brook
Batheaston School
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
A Derelict garages l
B
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
hool
s.com
Access and circulation l
• Unsightly
13
• For drop off area • Separate parking•for PODs complex Separate parking for PODs complex • Maintenance access • Maintenance access Independent Drop Independent off area Drop off area
shared surface
Traffic Flow l
Pedestrian route l
Indicative Ground Floor POD complex isolated from safe drop-off area Relocation of multi-use sport court (TBC) Traffic flow
Pedestrian route Pedestrian circulation to access PODs (single crossing point) Pedestrian access from designated drop-off zone through raised shared surface
Improved Traffic flow bays 47No parking ds ownedImproved by CuroLands Traffic flow owned by Curo
Traffic area flow for drop off area Traffic 47No parking bays flow for drop off
St Catherines Brook
route PedestrianPedestrian route
St Catherines Brook
ffic flowTraffic flow
to access PODs (single crossing point) PedestrianPedestrian circulation circulation to access PODs (single crossing point)
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
PODisolated complex isolated from safearea drop-off area complex from safe drop-off Relocation of multi-use sport court (TBC) cation of multi-use sport court (TBC)
St Catherines Brook
St Catherines Brook
St Catherines Brook
Improved Traffic flow • For drop off area • Separate parking for PODs complex • Maintenance access Independent Drop off area
Indicative icative Ground Ground Floor Floor
12 bays for community 12use/ bays for community use/ Pedestrian route through Pedestrian Pedestrian access from designated drop-off zone raisedroute Pedestrian accessstorage from designated drop-off storage Bin stores/cycle store Bin stores/cycle storezone through raised
ft 020 0208404 84042309 1380
ef info@zedpods.com 020 8404 2309
15
w www.zedfactory.com w www.zedfactory.com w www.zedpods.com
Lands owned by Curo
47No parking bays
Traffic flow for drop off area Traffic flow for POD complex
12 bays for community use/ storage Bin stores/cycle store
Pedestrian route
Existing Dwellings
8No additional bays
Maintenance
Vertical circulation (stairs to access PODs)
Raised shared surface between pedestrians and cars
t 020 8404 1380
Circulation 24
w www.zedpods.com e info@zedpods.com
f 020 8404 2309
e info@zedpods.com
w www.zedpods.com
w www.zedfactory.com
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
• For drop off area • For drop off area Traffic 8No additional Traffic flow for POD complex 8No additional baysflow for POD complex Existing Dwellings • Separate forbays PODs complex shared surface • Separate parking forparking PODs complex shared surface Raised shared surfaceRaised between shared surface betwee Vertical circulation (stairs to access PODs) • Maintenance access Vertical circulation (stairs to access PODs) pedestrians and cars Maintenance pedestrians and cars Maintenance • Maintenance access Independent Drop off area Independent Drop off area
ting Dwellings
04 1380
Pedestrian access from designated drop-off zone through raised shared surface
15
15
Long Section Layout l Indicative
First Floor
Short Section l
Indicative First Floor
Multi use sport court (Location/dimension TBC)
Multi use sport court (Location/dimension TBC)
Long Section Long Section Multi use sport court (Location/dimension TBC) Multi use sport court (Location/dimension TBC)
Multi use sport court (Location/dimension TBC) Multi use sport court (Location/dimension TBC)
Long Section
24 pods
Covered communal space
Vertical Access
Views
Landscape in drop-off area serves as a natural screen between existing and proposed PODs
Long Section
Landscape in drop-off area serves as a natural screen between existing and PODs Landscape in proposed drop-off area serves
Long Section l
Long Section
• 24 ZEDpods 24 pods
as a natural screen between existing and proposed PODs
Covered communal space
24 pods
Covered communal space
Vertical Access
Views
with views of exiting trees and St Catherines Brook • 24 ZEDpods
• Definition of raised communal spaces for residents • 24 ZEDpods with views of exiting trees and St eCatherines Brook f 020 8404 2309 info@zedpods.com t 020•8404 1380 Definition of raised communal spaces for residents
PV Roof
w www.zedpods.com
with views of exiting trees and St Catherines Brook t 020 8404 1380 t 020 8404 1380
f 020 8404 2309 f 020 8404 2309
e info@zedpods.com e info@zedpods.com
w www.zedfactory.com PV Roof PV Roof
w www.zedpods.com w www.zedpods.com
w www.zedfactory.com w www.zedfactory.com
Communal Space
Communal Space Communal Space
B Balcony B Balcony
B Balcony
©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved. ©ZEDpods Ltd. All rights reserved.
• Definition of raised spaces for residents Views Vertical Access communal A Access (Door & Small WC window)
A Access (Door & Small WC window) A Access (Door & Small WC window)
16
16
Proposed layout 16
25
‘Stitching’ the urban fabric line
Site 2 - Easy Commute
l
Site location
Existing buildings ‘Broken’ existing urban fabric line
Site Analysis
Existing car park l
ZPODs
Closing the Urban fabric l fabric line ‘Stitching’ the urban
tern h Eas
Sout
Road
Existing buildings
Car park Entry / Exit Existing buildings
Site Boundary
96No Car parking spaces ZPODs
‘Broken’ existing urban fabric line
Pedestrian access
Existing buildings
Car park Entry / Exit
Site Boundary
96No Car parking spaces
‘Broken’ existing urban fabric line
Pedestrian access
Covered areas
ZED POD
ZED POD
1
Site Analysis Gr ov eR oa d
Urban Concept
2
1
3
South Eastern Road View from car park
k
c ra
n tio
a St
1
ad
Ro
SiteRoad Analysis South Eastern View from car park
t ay
ilw
Ra
Strood Railway Station
Urban Concept Existing buildings Layout l ‘Broken’ existing urban fabric line
Existing car park l
Car park Entry / Exit
Site Boundary
96No Car parking spaces
‘Broken’ existing urban fabric line
Pedestrian access
‘Stitching’ the urban fabric line Existing buildings ZPODs
Existing buildings
Car park Entry / Exit
Site Boundary
96No Car parking spaces
‘Broken’ existing urban fabric line
Pedestrian access
2
Covered areas Grove Road View from car park
ZED POD ZED POD
2
Grove Road
View from car park - Site 2 Concept applied 26
‘Broken’ existing urban fabric line
ZED POD
Ur
Covered areas
‘Stitching’ the urban fabric line
Proposed Site
POD flexibility l
Visualisation l Existing buildings ZPODs Terraced (12No) Ra
ZPODs 90o (18No)
ilw
ay
tra
ck
ZPOD commercial (4No) Sta
tio
Communal Space
nR
oa
d
Amenity area Raised Circulation Vertical Circulation uth So
Pedestrian circulation
Ea rn ste ad Ro
91No Car parking spaces
• ZPODs & ZPOD 90o are positioned in a sensitive manner reconstructing the urban fabric.
d
oa
eR ov Gr
• Vertical circulation is restricted to 3 points Once above ground level pedestrians can circulate throughout the raised pop-up village
ed Site Existing buildings
• The ZPODs have a covered communal space, which encourages interaction between occupants.
ZPODs Terraced (12No)
• Grove road elevation recessed to prevent overlooking issues and reduce daylighting implications.
ZPODs 90o (18No) ZPOD commercial (4No) Existing buildings
Communal Space
ZPODs Terraced (12No)
Amenity area
ZPODs 90o (18No)
Raised Circulation
ZPOD commercial (4No)
Vertical Circulation
Communal Space
Pedestrian circulation
Amenity area
91No Car parking spaces
ZED POD
Visualisation l
• Commercial units are being proposed. They can also benefit from views of the amenity area • Amenity area provides a ‘centralized’ open space, that is intended to be shared by occupants.
ZED POD
Raised Circulation
• ZPODs & ZPOD 90o are positioned in a sensitive manner reconstructing the urban fabric.
Vertical Circulation Pedestrian circulation
• Vertical circulation is restricted to 3 points Once above ground level pedestrians can circulate throughout the raised pop-up village
91No Car parking spaces
• The ZPODs have a covered communal space, which encourages interaction between occupants.
• ZPODs & ZPOD 90o are positioned in a sensitive
• Grove road elevation recessed to prevent overlooking issues and reduce daylighting implications.
ZED POD
27
shed)
shed)
Site 3 - Parking & garages
l
1 1
1
Old Road, Medway
Existing car park and Garages l
Site surroundings l
2 2
2
1 1
2
1
Existing car park and Garages l
1
Northern curve View from the road
Existing buildings Existing buildings
1
Site boundary
Existing car park l
1
Site boundary
80No Car Garages parking spaces 10No (to be demolished)
Road West Access 80No parking spaces 2Car Old
10No Garages (toView befrom demolished) the road 80No Car parking spaces
Northern curve View from the road
Existing buildings Site boundary
10No Garages (to be demolished) 80No Car parking spaces
Concept West Access - Site 3 2 Old Roadapplied 28
10No Garages (to be demolished)
buildings Site Existing boundary 10No Garages (to be demolished)
Site boundary Existing buildings 80No Car parking spaces
Northern curve View from the road
View from the road
ZED POD
2
1
Northern curve View from the road
Northe View fr No Vie
Old Road West Access View from the road
ZED POD
2
Old Roa View fro 2 Old View
Proposed site layout Site Layout l
Visualisation l Existing buildings ZPODs Terraced (16No.) ZPODs 90o (12No.) Communal Space Raised Circulation Vertical Circulation Pedestrian circulation 12No additional spaces (Replacing garages) 5No Spaces lost for circulation 87No Car parking spaces
ZED POD
Visualisation l Existing buildings ZPODs Terraced (16No.) ZPODs 90o (12No.) Communal Space
ZED POD
Existing buildings
Raised Circulation
ZPODs Terraced (16No.)
Vertical Circulation
ZPODs 90o (12No.)
Pedestrian circulation
Communal Space
12No additional spaces (Replacing garages)
Raised Circulation Vertical Circulation
5No Spaces lost for circulation 87No Car parking spaces
Pedestrian circulation 12No additional spaces (Replacing garages) 5No Spaces lost for circulation 87No Car parking spaces
Before
After
29
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
100.0
MID
(kWh/m²/yr)
(kWh/m²/yr)
0.0
(kWh/m²/yr)
Low income
££
Efficiency
££
Efficiency Fuel costs
Fuel costs
£
£
Fuel costs
Efficiency
Fuel costs
2012 Heat Load (Semi Det) (kWh/m2/Yr)
Architects North facing
South facing
element
West facing
Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
0.12W/m²K 0.10 W/m²K 0.11W/m²K 0.95W/m²K
West facing
7159mm
Architects
Occupants
Occupants
efficiency
Mechanically systems: -Programmer -TRVs -U values Mechanically systems: -Thermostats -Air tightnes -Programmer -MVHR Envelope efficiency:
Envelope efficiency:
Air tightness: 4 m³/hr/m²
of the climate of Belfast,(Living the20C urban & Bedroom 18C) tissue and dwellings (which compared units from 1920 and 2012) combined with an analysis of the occupants behaviour, a series of conclusions were drawn which were then applied to the proposed scheme with the aim to reduced energy demand.
East facing
U values
efficiency
Air tightness: 4 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
1.47W/m²K
Air tightness: 14 m³/hr/m² From the analysis (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
Low income
Low income
-
Efficiency
Low income
60.0
80.0 A new strategy, which the 40.0 consists of understanding howEND 40.0 MID 60.0 20.0 occupants live and 20.0 interact with their homes, as well as END 40.0 0.0 0.0 acknowledging the architects role in this process, is being North facing South facing20.0East facing West facing proposed. Through the use of passive design strategies 0.0 the proposed dwellings haveelement reduced the predicted fuel East facing U values North facing South facing East facing West facing North facing South facing Walls: from 1.46W/m²K consumption for space heating 40kWh/m2 (for a Roof plane: 0.18 W/m²K typical 2012 unit) to0.51W/m²K under element 12kWh/m2U values element U values social housing Floor: 0.12W/m²K per year,1.46W/m²K reducing the financial burden on theWalls: fuel poor Windows: 1.47W/m²K Walls: Roof plane: 0.10 W/m²K Roof 0.18 Furthermore W/m²K Air tightness: 14to m³/hr/m² in plane: Belfast. it contributes the governments Floor: 0.11W/m²K (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C) Floor: target of0.51W/m²K reducing CO2 emissions. Windows: 0.95W/m²K
Windows:
l
In the UK, the domestic sector accounts for over 25% of total CO2 emissions. Furthermore, space heating is responsible for over 62% of dwellings consumption. Through improvements in the efficiency of dwellings fabric, combined with installation of mechanical equipment there has been significant reduction in consumption for newly built dwellings, which not only helps reduce CO2 levels, 1920s - Heat Load but also helps mitigate fuel poverty. The thesis challenges (kWh/m²/yr) 1920s - Heat Load 2012 Heat Load (Semi 120.0Det) 120.0 this (kWh/m²/yr) strategy and goes beyond improving the buildings (kWh/m2/Yr)100.0 100.0 120.0 fabric performance. 80.0 80.0
Changing the strategy
-
l M. Arch Thesis project Belfast, N. Ireland l 2015
Current strategy
Fuel Poverty: Going beyond efficiency The role of architect and occupant
-U values -Air tightnes
-TRVs -Thermostats -MVHR
Informed Design
7159mm
Informed Design
4540
5200mm
The schemes performance is also shown in the following pages. Firstly the site design process and the proposed layout; Secondly the units design process and then proposed units. 5200mm
4540
3770
Sensitive dwellings
6491
6491
An example of an antecipated occupant behaviour is shown, and to finalise, an average daily temperature comparison which shows the improvement achieved by this thesis proposal en relation to the current strategy. 3770
City
Design
Active occupants
6491
6491
Sensitive dwellings
3770
30
Understanding how the city, building & occupant interact
3770
The Proposal
City
Design
Active occupants Understanding how the city, building & occupant interact
2 .0
0 .0
9 .0 8 .0
1 .0
40.0
0 .0
20.0 0.0
%D F 1 0 .0 + 9 .0 8 .0
5.0+ 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 North facing South 2.5 facing 2.0 1.5 element 1.0 Walls: 0.5 Roof0plane:
Floor: Windows:
7 .0 6 .0 5 .0
MID END
80.0
1 0 .0 +
40.0
9 .0 8 .0
20.0
East facing
West facing
0.0 North facing
3 .0
6 .0
South facing
5 .0
4 .0 element
U values
1.46W/m²K 0.18 W/m²K 0.51W/m²K 1.47W/m²K
l
(kWh/m²/yr)
Wind velocity (Ecotec/Winair)
0 .0
5200mm
100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0
4540
2012
North facing
6491
Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
£
East facing
Efficiency
40.0 0.0
s
m²K m²K m²K m²K
Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
%D F
East facing
U values
0.12W/m²K 0.10 W/m²K 0.11W/m²K 0.95W/m²K
West facing 1 0 .0 +
7 .0
3 .0
6 .0
220.0 .0
5 .0
40.0
1 .0 0.0
3 .0
0 .0
North facing 1 .0
9 .0
7 .0 6 .0 5 .0 4 .0
Envelope efficiency: -U values -Air tightnes
East facing
40.0
5 .0
6491
Envelope efficiency: 2012 Heat Load (Semi Det)
South facing
element
Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
(kWh/m2/Yr)
120.0
-U values -Air tightnes
100.0 80.0 60.0
Mechanically systems: -Programmer -TRVs -Thermostats -MVHR
40.0
3770
East facing
Understanding how the city, 20.0 building & occupant interact 0.0
West facing
North facing
South facing
element
U values
Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
1.46W/m²K 0.18 W/m²K 0.51W/m²K 1.47W/m²K
East facing
West facing
U values
0.12W/m²K 0.10 W/m²K 0.11W/m²K 0.95W/m²K
Envelope
Air tightness: 4 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
Air tightness: 14 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
-U -Ai
4 .0 3 .0 2 .0 1 .0 0 .0
2 .0 1 .0
Effic
END
7159mm
7 .0 6 .0
3770
Active occupants MID
60.0
efficiency
Sensitive dwellings
City
- Heat Load Air1920s tightness: 4 m³/hr/m² (kWh/m²/yr) (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
80.0
1 .0
-
West facing
0.12W/m²K 0.10 W/m²K Design 0.11W/m²K 0.95W/m²K
100.0
0 .0
Mechanically systems: -Programmer 3770 -TRVs -Thermostats -MVHR
Space heating demand (TAS EDSL)
Informed Design
U values
Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
8 .0
7159mm
0 .0
South facing
element
9 .0
3 .0 2 .0
2 .0
1 0 .05200mm +
4 .0
Fuel costs
5200mm
%D F Occupants
6 .0
N
5.0+ 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
4 .0
North facing
Architects
efficiency 5 .0
8 .0
8 .0
4 .0
9 .0
3 .0
5200mm
60.0
9 .0
0.0
8 .0
60.0
£
2012 Heat Load (Semi Det) (kWh/m2/Yr)
1 0 .0 +
20.0
7 .0
Air tightness: 4 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
/m² 18C)
5 .0
120.0
1 0 .0 +
1.46W/m²K 0.18 W/m²K 0.51W/m²K 1.47W/m²K
Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
Layout Heat sources and losses
Fuel costs
4540
60.0
80.0
Sensitive dwellings
%D F
5.0+ 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 North facing South facing 1.5 element 1.0 0.5 Walls: 0
40.0
%D F
6 .0
££
U values
1.46W/m²K 0.18 W/m²K 0.51W/m²K 1.47W/m²K
80.0
END 40.0 Mechanically systems: Low income 20.0 Envelope efficiency: -Programmer 20.0 0.0 0.0 -TRVs values North facing South-U facing East facing West facing Occupants -Thermostats -Air tightnes element U values -MVHR
3770
Air tightness: 14 m³/hr/m² Efficiency (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
%D F Mechanically systems: 1 0 .0-Programmer + 5200mm 9 .0 -TRVs 120.0 8 .0 -Thermostats 7 .0 -MVHR 100.0
0 .0
(kWh/m²/yr)
Efficiency3770
MID
60.0
(kWh/m²/yr)
(kWh/m²/yr)
West facing
Air tightness: 14 m³/hr/m² Fuel 20C costs (Living & Bedroom 18C)
6491
6491
(kWh/m²/yr)
South facing
Low income element
3770
80.0
20.0
West facing
Low income
20.0
2012 Heat Load (Semi Det) (kWh/m2/Yr)
120.0
END
END
3770
3770
MID
MID
0.0
-
100.0
Daylighting factor (ecotect /Radiance)
7159mm
80.0
100.0
3770
-U values -Air tightnes
(kWh/m²/yr)
120.0
1 .0
Envelope efficiency:
120.0
100.0
7159mm
Air tightness: 4 m³/hr/m² 1920s - Heat Load (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
2 .0
efficiency
1920s - Heat Load (kWh/m²/yr)
120.0
Architects
West facing
0.12W/m²K 0.10 W/m²K 0.11W/m²K 0.95W/m²K
Walls: 2 .0 plane: Roof 1 .0 Floor: 0 .0 Windows: 3 .0
Air tightness: 14 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
4 .0
5.0+ 4.5 4.0 3.5 East facing 3.0 2.5 U2.0values 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
7 .0
efficiency
5200mm
U values
0.12W/m²K 0.10 W/m²K 0.11W/m²K 0.95W/m²K
Air tightness: 4 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
Air tightness: 14 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
%D F
0 .0
60.0
1.46W/m²K 0.18 W/m²K 0.51W/m²K 1.47W/m²K
West facing
6491
60.0
East facing
4540
80.0
1 .0
6491
2 .0
100.0
6491
3 .0
100.0
2 .0
4540
4 .0
(kWh/m²/yr)
5 .0
4 .0 3 .0
120.0
South facing
Fuel costs element Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
Efficiency
U values
£North facing
6491
120.0
6 .0
(kWh/m²/yr)
7 .0
0.0
West facing
7159mm
Fuel costs
(kWh/m²/yr)
1920s - Heat Load (kWh/m²/yr)
8 .0
Walls: Roof plane: (kWh/m2/Yr) Floor: Windows:
Efficiency
(kWh/m²/yr)
7 .0 6 .0 5 .0
40.0 20.0
East facing
££
0 .0
60.0
6491
9 .0 8 .0
2 .0
4540
5.0+ 4.5 4.0 North facing South facing 3.5 3.0 2.5 element 2.0 1.5 1.0 2012 Heat Load (Semi0.5 Det) 0
0.0
costs
1 .0 80.0
Urban morphology & Layout Sensitive analysis dwellings 7159mm
31
Informed Design
5200mm
4540
1 0 .0 +
9 .0
END
40.0
£
Air tightness: 4 m³/hr/m² (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
Low income
(kWh/m²/yr)
(kWh/m²/yr)
-
20.0
1 0 .0 +
MID
U values
3 .0 100.0
6491
l 1920’s
80.0 60.0
2012
5 .0
3.5 3.0
2.5 Walls: 0.12W/m²K Fuel Roof plane:2.0 0.10 W/m²K 1.5 Efficiency 1.0 Floor: 0.11W/m²K 0.5 Windows: 0 0.95W/m²K
Heat Load (Semi Det) Low income Air tightness: 14 m³ /hr/m² (kWh/m2/Yr) (Living 20C & Bedroom 18C)
6 .0
120.0 4 .0
100.0
%D F
%D F
7 .0
1920s - Heat Load (kWh/m²/yr)
120.0
element
U values
1.46W/m²K 0.18 W/m²K 0.51W/m²K 1.47W/m²K
Walls: Roof plane: Floor: Windows:
%D F 1 0 .0 +
d
ng
element
1 .0
Achieving comfort
l
Action
1980 Semi Detached
Discomfort awareness
2006 Detached
l
Anticipated Thermal re-action
2010 Apartment
Thermal Pathway
X
Impacts on comfort
The occupants 32
1934 Semi-detached
√
Climate summar Climate summary (Belfa (Belfas
l
30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 Temperatue (°C) Temperatue (°C)
l Occupants & Dwelling surveyed
l Occupant Behaviour identified
1920 Mid Terrace
20.0 20.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0
Jan Jan 20% 20%
Feb Feb 26% 26%
Mar Mar 20% 20%
Apr Apr 22% 22%
May May 32% 32%
Jun Jun 21% 21%
47% 47%
48% 48%
49% 49%
43% 43%
41% 41%
44% 44%
33% 33%
26% 26%
31% 31%
35% 35%
27% 27%
35% 35%
2
Average daily global horizontal radiation (kWh/m2) Average daily global horizontal radiation (kWh/m2) Average of DBT (°C) Average of DBT (°C)
Average Max & Min Average Max & Min
l Design applicability
Design applicability 33
l Site layout development
l Site analysis
December South: 40W/m² East: 14W/m² West: 12W/m² Horizontal: 17W/m²
South Block l
SOUTH facade 10:00 – 14:30 4.5hr 9:00 – 17:00 8hr 9:30 – 18:30 9hr
March South: 99W/m² East: 53W/m² West: 63W/m² Horizontal: 86W/m²
West Block l
West Block l
Exposure
l
EAST facade X 9:00 – 13:30 4.5hr 9:00 – 13:30 4.5hr
South Block l
SOUTH facade 10:00 – 14:30 4.5hr 9:00 – 17:00 8hr 9:30 – 18:30 9hr South Block l
SOUTH facade 10:00 – 14:30 4.5hrEast Block l South Block l 9:00 – 17:00 8hr EAST facade SOUTH facade 9:30 – 18:30 9hr 11:00 – 12:00 1hr 10:00 – 14:30 4.5hr
9:00 – 12:30 3.5hr 9:00 – 12:30 3.5hr
9:00 – 17:00 8hr 9:30 – 18:30 9hr
WEST facade West Block l 14:00 – 15:00 1hr EAST facade 14:00 – 17:30 3.5hr West Block l X 14:00 – 20:00 6hr EAST facade 9:00 – 13:30 4.5hr X 9:00 – 13:30 4.5hr 9:00 – 13:30 4.5hr 9:00 – 13:30 WEST 4.5hr facade
December South: 40W/m² East: 14W/m² West: 12W/m² Horizontal: 17W/m² March South: 99W/m² East: 53W/m² West: 63W/m² Horizontal: 86W/m²
WEST facade X 13:30 – 15:30 (1/2) 2hr 15:30 – 18:00 2hr June South: 13:30 – 19:30 6hr East: East Block l
EAST facade 11:00 – 12:00 1hr 9:00 – 12:30 3.5hr 9:00 – 12:30 3.5hr
Site Layout process
WEST facade14:00 – 15:00 1hr – 17:30 3.5hr 14:00 – 15:0014:00 1hr – 20:00 6hr 14:00 – 17:3014:00 3.5hr 34 14:00 – 20:00 6hr
East Block l
MarchDecember 40W/m² South:South: 99W/m² 14W/m² East: East: 53W/m² West:West:63W/m² 12W/m² Horizontal: 86W/m² Horizontal: 17W/m²
l
WEST facade 14:00 – 15:00 1hr 14:00 – 17:30 3.5hr 14:00 – 20:00 6hr
December June South: 108W/m² 40W/m² South: East: 14W/m² East: 120W/m² West: 113W/m² 12W/m² West: Horizontal: 17W/m² Horizontal: 192W/m²
WEST facade X East Block l 13:30 – 15:30 (1/2) 2hr EAST 15:30 facade – 18:00 2hr
108W/m² 120W/m² West: 113W/m² Horizontal: 192W/m²
Indicative Incident radiation
EAST facade X 9:00 – 13:30 4.5hr 9:00 – 13:30 4.5hr
June March South:South: 108W/m² 99W/m² East: East: 120W/m² 53W/m² West: 113W/m² West: 63W/m² Horizontal: 192W/m²
Horizontal: 86W/m²
June South: 108W/m² East: 120W/m² West: 113W/m² Horizontal: 192W/m²
5 .0 0 +
Spring Equinox
4 .5 0 4 .0 0 3 .5 0
Spring Equinox
3 .0 0 2 .5 0 2 .0 0
Summer Solstice
1 .5 0 1 .0 0 0 .5 0 0 .0 0
9:00
SW wind (prevailing)
l
Spring Equinox
Wind
Sun Patch
l
Winter Solstice
12:00 5.0+ 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
%D F 1 0 .0 +
15:00
9 .0 8 .0 7 .0
N wind
6 .0 5 .0 4 .0
l
2 .0
Application
3 .0
1 .0 0 .0
m/ s 5 .0 0 + 4 .5 0 4 .0 0 3 .5 0 3 .0 0 2 .5 0 2 .0 0 1 .5 0 1 .0 0 0 .5 0 0 .0 0
%D F 1 0 .0 + 9 .0 8 .0 7 .0 6 .0 5 .0 4 .0 3 .0 2 .0 1 .0 0 .0
Analysis 35
Cluster (basic composition l
l
Buffer spaces
Bedroom cooler temp
Cluster
Massing
l
2 Bedroom Units
Living warmer temp Temperature preferances
Single person Single person
Elderly
1 Bedroom Units
Elderly Reduced heat loss
Small families 2 Bedroom Units
Buffer spaces
Bedroom cooler temp
Cluster l
Living warmer temp Temperature preferances
Single person Single person
Elderly
1 Bedroom Units
Elderly
Staggered
l
Reduced heat loss
Staggered l
Unit design process Small families
36
2 Bedroom Units
Small families 2 Bedroom Units
Buffer spaces Buffer spaces
l Plans
l Cluster units
South elevation
3
1l Living
2l Kitchen
First floor 4
3l Bedroom 4l WC
5l Warm room
3 2
4
Internal gains (
4
)
Buffer space (reduction of heat loss) Circulation
1 3
3
3
Service Social Private
North elevation
South elevation
Staggered unit
l
Ground floor
East elevation
Units 37
Site functions & activities
l
Games Car park
BBQ area
Bin/Cycle store Allotments
Wind break
Playground
Informal sports
Gathering area
Site Layout 38
Visualizations 39
Cluster units & Allotments
l
Staggered units
l
NS NS - 2BED -INTER - sunny - 2BED -INTER - sunny l
1400 1400
20
1200 1200
Living Living
Buffer Bufferspace space
Buffer space
15
10
55
5
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24
1400 1200 1000
800 800
10 10
0
1000 1000 Living
1600
600 600
800
400 400
600
200 200
400
00
200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Bedroom Bedroomtemperature temperature dropping droppingbelow belowcomfort comfort
0
(Wh/m2) 2000 1800 1600 1400
15
1200
10
800
1000
600 5
400 200
0
0 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PET PET8.2 8.2°C°C
10.9C 10.9C(dry (drybulb) bulb) 6.1m/s 6.1m/s(wind (windvelocity) velocity)
54% 14:00 Mom arriving 54%(RH) (RH) from work
PET 8.2°C
10.9C (dry bulb) 6.1m/s (wind velocity) 54% (RH)
19.5 19.5°C°C (resultant (resultanttemp) temp)
Intermediate period (2Bed unit (NS) )
(°C)
Internal doors
30
(Wh/m2) 2000 1800
25
19.5°C (resultant temp)
2nd 2ndApril April
Night shutters (Bedroom & Living)
20
Bedroom temperature dropping below comfort
14:00 14:00Mom Momarriving arriving from fromwork work
Cool period (2Bed unit (NS))
(°C) 25
1600 1400
Temperature
20
2nd April
20.8 20.8°C°C (resultant (resultanttemp) temp)
Horizontal Radiation
15 15
2000 1800
Horizontal Radiation
1600 1600
25
20 20
1200 15
1000 800
10
600 400
5
200
20.8°C
(resultant temp)
0
0 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
24.4 24.4°C°C (resultant (resultanttemp) temp) insulated insulated 24.4 °C net net night shutters nighttemp) shutters curtains (resultant curtains
heavy heavy curtains curtains
insulated night shutters
‘Bed ‘Bedtime’ time’
net curtains
heavy curtains
25
Temperature
23:00 23:00Mom Mom going goingto tobed bed 18.4 18.4°C°C
(resultant temp)
(resultant temp) 21:00 Kids going to bed
19.1°C
(resultant temp)
Occupant behaviour
2000
1200 15
1000 800
10
600 400 200
0
0 24
18.4°C (resultant temp) insulated insulated net net night nightshutters shutters curtains curtains
(Wh/m2)
1600
5
23:00 Mom going to bed
1st floor
1400
20
21:00 21:00Kids Kids going goingto tobed bed
40
kitchen window Stairs & Buffer
1800
‘Bed time’
19.1 19.1°C°C (resultant (resultanttemp) temp)
Warm period (2Bed unit (NS))
(°C) 30
insulated night shutters
25
26
Global horizontal radiation (Wh/m2)
heavy heavy curtains curtains
Outdoor temperature (°C)
net curtains
heavy curtains
Horizontal Radiation
00
2000 2000 1800 1800
Temperature
25 25
(2Bed unit (NS) )
30
NS - 2BED
(free running)
30 30
Typical weeks
Intermediate period
l
Intermediate Intermediateperiod period--Sunny Sunny (2Bed period - Sunny (2Bedunit unit(NS) (NS))Intermediate )
27
28
29
Global diffuse horizontal radiation (Wh/m2) Buffer space (°C)
Living room (°C)
Bedroom (°C)
30
Comfort band Bedroom (kids) (°C)
Visualization
10.0
0.0
0.0 5.0
900.0
20.0
5.0
800.0
15.0 0.0
700.0
10.0 -5.0
-5.0
600.0
-5.0
10.0 -5.0
500.0
5.0
25.0 15.0 20.0
10.0
200.0
Daily Av of global horizontal radiation [Wh/m2]
Daily Av of diffuse horizontal radiation [Wh/m2]
Daily Av of 1920 S LivDin Resultant Temp (C)
Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C) Daily Av of global horizontal radiation [Wh/m2] 0.0
-5.0
Comfort Band (C) 100.0
Daily Av of 1920 S LivDin Resultant Temp (C) Daily Av of global horizontal radiation [Wh/m2]
Daily Av of diffuse horizontal radiation [Wh/m2]
Daily Av of 1920 S LivDin Resultant Temp (C)
Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C)
Comfort Band (C)
700.0 600.0 500.0
15.0 5.0
10.0
400.0 300.0
0.0 5.0 -5.0
Daily Av of global horizontal radiation [Wh/m2] 400.0 Daily Av of diffuse horizontal radiation [Wh/m2] Daily Av of global horizontal radiation [Wh/m2] 0.0 Comfort Daily Av of diffuse horizontal Daily Av of global horizontal radiation [Wh/m2] Daily Avradiation of 1920 S[Wh/m2] LivDin Resultant Temp (C) Band (C) 0.0 Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C) Daily Av of 1920 S LivDin Resultant Temp (C) 300.0 Daily Av of 1920 S LivDin Resultant Temp (C) Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C) -5.0
600.0
20.0
-5.0
200.0
500.0 400.0 300.0
600.0 500.0 400.0 300.0
1000.0 600.0
Daily average radiation (Wh/m²)
1000.0
800.0
700.0
700.0 700.0
Daily average radiation (Wh/m²)
5.0 5.0
0.0
0.0
25.0 10.0
Temperature Temperature (°C) (°C)
15.0
15.0
5.0
Living room Average daily resultant temperature Comparison (1920's x CfSH 4 x Proposed Design)
10.0
10.0
30.0 15.0
900.0
Daily average radiation (Wh/m²)
20.0
20.0
15.0
25.0 30.0
Daily average radiation (Wh/m²)
25.0
15.0
20.0
Temperature (°C)
30.0
Temperature (°C)
35.0
Temperature (°C)
l 1920’s, 2012 & proposal comparison l
25.0
Temperature (°C)
Temperature (°C)
Temperature (°C)
20.0
35.0 20.0
900.0 500.0 800.0 400.0 700.0 300.0 600.0 200.0
200.0
500.0 100.0
200.0 100.0
400.0 0.0
100.0 0.0
300.0
0.0
Comfort Band (C) Daily Av of diffuse horizontal radiation 100.0[Wh/m2] Average of External Temperature (C) Comfort Band (C)
Daily average radiation (Wh/m²) Daily average radiation (Wh/m²)
35.0
25.0 30.0
Average of External Temperature (C) 200.0
Average of External Temperature (C) Daily Av of 2012 Living Resultant Temp (C) Living Resultant Temp (C) Daily Av Proposed (NSDaily 2) Design Av of 2012 Living Resultant Temp (C) 0.0 100.0 Comfort Band ( Daily Av of diffuse horizontal radiation [Wh/m2] 2012 Living Resultant Temp[Wh/m2] (C) Daily Av of global horizontal radiation Daily Av of 1920 S LivDin Resultant Temp (C)
Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C)
Average of External Temperature (C) Daily Av of Living global Resultant horizontalTemp radiation Daily Av of 2012 (C) [Wh/m2] Daily Avofof1920 diffuse horizontal radiation [Wh/m2] Daily Av S LivDin Resultant Temp (C) Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C)
Daily Av of diffuse horizontal radiation [Wh/m2]
0.0
Comfort Band (
Average of External Temperature (C) Comfort Band (C) Daily Av Proposed (NS 2) DesignLiving Resultant Temp (C) Daily Av of 2012 Living Resultant Temp (C)
Average of External Temperature (C) Daily Av of 2012 Living Resultant Temp (C)
Outcome 41
l Fd Degree Architectural technology Dunmurry, N. Ireland l 2012 This scheme consists of ten identical two storey, two bedroom detached units, which are surrounded by golf courses in Dumurry, south of Belfast. The units are positioned on the site in a manner to avoid overshadowing as well as allowing for individual access and privacy. At the front of the site there’s a communal amenity area (under the overhead cables which would have prevented the construction of units). The SW is covered in trees which combined with a heavier stone construction on the W elevation of the units helps to attenuate motorway noise.
Belfast
Scheme concept
Holiday Home
Golf Course
Site Layout concept
l
Site Golf Course
M1 Motorway
Site access
Few openings were designed in the north elevation to minimize heat loss and in the west to reduce noise flanking paths. The south and east elevations have larger openings to allow for solar gains and views, respectively. The shallow plan combined with the large openings ensures good daylighting levels. The top floor houses both bedrooms and a viewing deck. The ground floor has a open plan living and kitchen area which opens to a south facing gathering area. The mono-pitch roof tilts towards south to allow for installation of solar panels or photovoltaic. The tilted louvres help protect the gathering area and the southern glazed areas from excessive solar gains during the warmer period.
Unit concept
l
The scheme is proposed as a highly insulated timber frame construction. The details are shown in the following pages.
Proposal 42
Reed bed Golf course Overhead cables
Amenity area
l Plans
Ground Floor
l
First Floor
l
N - No solar gains; Daylight (smaller opening area) N
S
W 2
kg/m
S
N
S
W - Sound Attenuation W 2
kg/m
S
S - Solar gains (large opening area) + Louvres
Plans & Visualization 43
l Sections & detailing
Cross section
l
Clerestory
Hidden gutter
Sections & Details 44
l
l
l Sections & detailing
Parapet detail
Long section
l
l
Floor & wall detail
l
Sections & Details 45
l Elevations
North - West
l
N
S
W
N
2
kg/m S
S
W 2
kg/m
S
Visualization 46
l Elevations
South - East
l
Living area
l
Visualization 47
l Fd Degree Architectural technology Belfast, N. Ireland l 2011 The extension to the central library is part of a group project which included a student union and accommodation for the University of Ulster (UU) relocation project into Belfast’s city centre. The library extension would be used by the community as well as students.
Site analysis & Layout
Central Library Extension
Car park Derelict buildings Open space City gateway Lively area Lifeless area
Site
The project is proposed in the vicinity of UUs new campus, in an area which currently is lifeless. The three proposed buildings are situated to encourage circulation within the lifeless area so that different movement patterns are established throughout the day and night. The 3 lower stories, where books are stored, work as a platform which raises the building within the crowded city centre, allowing for natural sunlight to permeate the building through the winter gardens. A cantilevered platform ‘peaks’ out into the city and allows users to appreciate the neighbouring listed building as well as views of Belfast. Areas of interest were create through the proposal of two winter gardens. One on the ground floor, which attracts people into the building; and one on the third floor for people to enjoy a good book or newspaper in a shelteredexternal area protected from the elements. The nature of the building, being a library, demands a structure which can support high loads. In-situ concrete is the best alternative for this type of building.
UU New Campus
Residential area Student accommodation
Student Union
UU existing Campus
In an attempt to reduce the volume of concrete (as well as the buildings weight) the slabs have been designed as a system called bubble deck. This is a hollow deck slab in which recycled plastic balls substitute the concrete which would have no structural capability, resulting in a lighter structure with the benefits of a monolithic construction. The lower part of the slab is prefabricated and delivered to site (with the plastic balls all in place). In-situ concrete is then poured, giving the slab the full strength. The hollow spheres incorporated into the slab reduce dead load by up to 35% if compared to a solid slab with same bearing capacity. This weight reduction allows for further reductions in the building structure, through less columns and bearing walls. No beams are necessary, resulting in a flat and seamless soffit.
Proposal 48
Site
Student accommodation
Library
Castle Court shopping centre
City centre
Long section
l
l
l
Visualization
Concept
l Environmental strategy
Cooler period
l
Intermediate period
Warmer period
l
l
Concept 49
Library
Plans
l
Store
Ground, First & Second floor
l
Store
Fourth & Fifth floor Library
Frames
hostel
l
library st
Store
Library
Store
apt blk
Library
union st
Library
Store
Store
Frames
hostel
Frames
Store Library
Library Frames
Library
hostel library st
library st
hostel
Store Store
library st
Library
Store
Store
Library
Library
apt blk
Store
Formal seating
Library
union st
Store
Library apt blk
Library
union st
apt blk
Library
Store
Store
Store
Computer station
Library
Store
Library
union st Library
Frames
Library
Library
Store
Store
hostel
Group study library st
Store
Store
Library
Library
Store Library
No openings apt blk
Store
Library
union st
Store
Third floor
l
Roof level City Views
Cafe
Smoking area
Function room
Informal seating
Plans 50
l
Library Store
l
l
13 9
9 12
13
13
1
10
2
11
Winter Gardens
l Sections
Long section
Upper
l
Lower
l
15 1 l Book storage 2 l Delivery
7500
4
17
condiment table
8
14
3 l Lower winter garden 4 l CafĂŠ/function room 5 l Newspaper archive
16
6 l Upper winter garden
7 l Cantilevered external area
8 l Kitchen 9 l Toilets
10 l Moveable shelving
11 l Study rooms
12 l Seating area
Cross section
13 l Computer stations
l
14 l Smoking area 15 l Plant
16 l Green roof
17 l Photo voltaic panels Circulation
Slab - Bubble Deck system
l
Sections 51
l Graduation Project Jundiai, Brazil l 2001
Location
Residential Scheme - Jundiai
To escape from the confusion of the big cities people often live in smaller adjacent cities and commute to work every day, which means commuters often face endless hours of traffic jams noise and air pollution. This scheme aims to reduce unnecessary commute while taking advantage of its geographical location, between Campinas and Sao Paulo, which are the main research and educational centres in Brazil.
The final graduation project focused on the development of the residential section of the scheme. Each student developed the design for one of the 5 sub areas within the residential section, in my case C5. The upper part of the C5 site has walking access to the commercial area. Dwellings in this area have been specified as 1 bedroom apartment units, for single occupancy and/ or short term use. These are the vertical units. The lower section of the site has been designated for the 3 bedroom dwellings, for the employees with families. This area is also closer to the school, allotments and amenity space. These are the horizontal units. The vertical and horizontal units are shown in the following pages.
Proposal 52
Study area
To avoid the commute happening from Sao Paulo and Campinas into Jundiai the south east of the study area has been designated for residential use. The dwellings are to be owned by the companies operating in the commercial area and will house visiting professionals or professionals and their families that relocate to Jundiai for the duration of their contracts.
l
The proposed commercial and residential scheme intends to revert this trend, allowing for people to live and work in Jundiai. The proximity with the two main commercial and research centres will provide support and any additional specialized professionals required.
l C5 - Layout & Sections
A Vertical units Horizontal Units
B
Section BB
A
l
B
763,0 766 765
759,0 752,4 752,4
764 763 762 761 760 759 758 757 756 755 754 753 752 751 750 749 748 747 746 745 744 743 742 741 740 739
753,6
753,6
741,0
Section AA
l
763,0 758,8
741,0 740,3
738,8
737,0
The Site 53
l
Section-elevations
l
Plans 1 l Living
2 l Kitchen
3 l Bedroom 14l lLiving WC 25l lKitchen Communal space 3 l Bedroom 4 l WC
5 l Communal space Sun attenutation space Service Social Sun attenutation space Private Service Main circulation Social Private
Vertical Units Main circulation
54
West
South
l
l
Visualization 55
l
l
Sections
l Plans
Ground Floor
1
l
Short section
5
3
2
6
5 4
7
1
3
2
2
5
1
5
Roof runoff
l
7 2
9 1
3
2
6
5
4
5
6
4
1
9
8
7 10
Plan view (Concrete flags on bricks shade for concrete roof)
4
5 5
9
4
First Floor
l
7 2
8
7 10
3 l Dining
4 l Double garage 5 l Kitchen 8 6 l Utility
4 l Double garage 5 l Kitchen 6 l Utility
7 l Double bedroom
Horizontal Units 56
8 l Single Bedrooms 9 l TV room 10 l Study 1 l Living 2 l Central atrium 3 l Dining 4 l Double garage 5 l Kitchen 6 l Utility 7 l Double bedroom 8 l Single Bedrooms 9 l TV room 10 l Study
10
4
3
5
3 l Dining
7
1
9
1 l Living 2 l Central atrium
1 l Living 2 l Central atrium
8
9
79l Double bedroom
ServiceBedrooms 8 l Single 9 l TV room Social 10 l Study Private
Service Long section Social
l
8
7
3
Private
2
Main circulation Buffer space Internal garden/Courtyard Rain water runoff 8
7
Main circulation Buffer space Internal garden/Courtyard Rain water runoff Service Social Private Main circulation Buffer space Internal garden/Courtyard Rain water runoff
1
3
2
1
7 2
1
Front
l
Visualization 57
Rear
l
Visualization
Visualization 59