AY 2009/2010 OVERSEAS RESEARCH PROGRAM, SPECIAL TERM
DESIGN STUDIO ERIK G L’HEUREUX ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
PROBING HYDROLOGICAL URBANISM
BAEK SO MANG LIANE EE RULIAN FELICIA GOH JIAN FANG HUANG JUN CHENG OSCAR GOLDRON KORINTUS LYNETTE LIM
NG GEOK HAN PEK LING YONG ELLYN TENG TEO WEILING WINNIE WONG
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE SCHOOL OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE
Probing Hydrological Urbanism Cambodia / Singapore
Erik G. L’Heureux, ed. Baek So Mang Liane Ee Rulian Felicia Goh Jian Fang Huang Jun Cheng Oscar Goldron Korintus Lynette Lim Ng Geok Han Pek Ling Yong Ellyn Teng Teo Weiling Winnie Wong
With support by
100 Beach Road #16-08 Shaw Tower Singapore 189702
Probing Hydrological Urbanism: Cambodia / Singapore
ISBN978-981-08-6722-5
Probing Hydrological Urbanism Cambodia / Singapore
Department of Architecture National University of Singapore 1
Published by authors and with assistance by Department of Architecture School of Design and Enviroment, National University of Singapore 4 Architecture Drive, Singapore 117566
© Individual Contributors © Department of Architecture School of Design and Enviroment, National University of Singapore © Individual Contributors All rights reserved; no parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher. The publisher does not warrant or assume any legal responsibility for the publication’s contents. All opinions expressed in the book are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National University of Singapore.
2010
Assistant Professor/ Editor: Erik G. L’Heureux AIA, LEED AP
Sarah Baek Liane Ee Rulian Felicia Goh Huang Jun Cheng Oscar Goldron Korintus Lynette Lim Ng Geok Han Pek Ling Yong Ellyn Teng Teo Weiling Winnie Wong
2
Contents Reflections Erik G. L’Heureux, AIA LEED AP
4
Thoughts Felicia Goh Lynette Lim Ng Geok Han Pek Ling Yong Huang Jun Cheng Oscar Goldron Korintus
8
Chapter 1 Land & Waterscapes
12
Chapter 2 Geopolitics of Cambodia
78
Chapter 3 Hydrological Forms
146
Chapter 4 Hydrological Infrastructures
180
Bibliography
260
3
Reflections
Singapore and Cambodia are located within 850 miles of one another, or about a two-hour plane ride between Changi International Airport and the tarmac in the rice fields of Siem Reap. The distance is relatively close in today’s world; a similar distance exists between New York and Chicago, Shanghai and Hong Kong, and London and Rome. Yet, by almost every measure, Singapore and Cambodia are in stark contrast and symbolise very different visions of the world forward. Singapore represents the seemingly highest state of development in terms of gross domestic product (GDP), growth, efficient urban planning and social policies. The population is predominately educated to an advanced level and maintains one of the highest levels of income in Asia and the world. Accolades grace the policies of Singapore and its development strategies from the United Nations, western governments, and businesses alike. Fulfilling the mantra of “housing for the people”, literally 83 per cent of the population live 12 stories up in government-sponsored tropically modified Unite d’habitations. The crime rate is low, the economy roaring with 14 per cent growth in 2010, and investment in tourism, biotechnology, and research sectors being the envy of most developed nations. The nation is fully urbanized, agriculture predominately erased long ago and replaced by a shopping paradise where almost everything is imported. Space is traded and sold at the highest level of government in the name of national development, keeping property prices growing and its residents occupied with paying the monthly mortgage. Traffic is managed centrally, automobile purchases are limited and the road sides are trimmed continually. By most measures, the ubiquitous title of an efficient, clean, green and blue city-state holds true as Singapore tries to shed the negative stereotypes of yesteryear. Singapore’s historical rise from a sea-faring outpost to one of the world’s busiest ports comes with a strange contradiction. Since the colonisation of Singapore by Sir Stamford Raffles, the island has proceeded on a continual lobotomy of its most historical and crucial resource: water, creating an entirely interiorised nation divorced from the sea. Ports, defense structures, industrial landscapes and parkways have cut a nation from its maritime origins in the production of two worlds separating city living from the sea in a series of surgical ambitions. One is an interior world of Housing Development Board (HDB) flats, private-gated residential condominiums and landed homes for the bourgeois; the other world consists of industry, transportation, and petrochemical refineries dotting the coastline. Both worlds are equally off-limits to one another. Like the concentric rings of an onion, the island continually insulates itself from its surroundings in a garrison-state position or Truman Show bubble. Think Buckminster Fuller’s dome over Manhattan, albeit constructed more subversively and invisibly layer by layer, function by function. The exterior is the most
4
dirty and unsightly, the most interior the jewel of the nation in its virgin tropical heart. The implementation of the United Nations’ (UN) plan of 1964 for Singapore’s development sits somewhere subconsciously in the country’s model for growth, where a ring city wraps a green heart of re-constructed jungle, setting the stage for a distributed sprinkling of new towns surrounding the island. Yet, somehow, the sea and the proposed water-borne taxi links never made it into Singapore’s history – rather, land reclamation and concrete erosion barriers kept the sea at bay while the container port fuelled the lifeblood of the Southeast Asian capitalistic miracle. The population was re-distributed from the dense centre across the interior, isolated from the sea and protected by the nation-state and the imported industry that keeps the economy humming forward.
Figure 1. R. Buckminster Fuller, Dome over Manhattan, 2 Mile Diameter, 1960
The local vernacular of kampongs was removed long ago in Singapore’s embrace for a new future and the few remaining kelongs now hide in the shadow of jack-up rigs and ship-building behemoths of Keppel Shipyard and Sembawang dry docks. Rain, the daily reminder that yes, you are in the tropics, is channelled in concrete dykes beneath the city, moving each deluge faster than the automobile traffic above1. The city looks like any other “modernised” city, similar to Houston or Los Angeles or Dubai, yet, it is an island city that has precisely decapitated itself from its very foundation – the sea the surrounds it and the jungle rain that made it such a perfect outpost for that early British colonizer, Mr. Raffles.
Singapore is one of the important centres of a 21st century world, a node of capital influx, product trade and migration destination at the crossroads between Asia and Europe, India and China, and between a rural, poor past and, as William Gibson once claimed, a “clean dystopia representing our techno future”2. It is the darling of Southeast Asia and the seeming new development model embraced by China, Russia, United Arab Emirates and the world over, a centralised state-sponsored capitalism. Cambodia, on the other hand, operates as the very mirror, a reflection, of the history of Singapore , albeit in a different location and context. Cambodia sits at the other end of the develop ment spectrum with a largely rural population living directly off the land and its water. A low-density, highly dispersed agrarian populat-ion employs the most direct means to establish life. The settlement patterns and architectural formation are a direct product of neither government planning nor historical pastiche, but of the necessities and function required to live each day. By all means, life in Cambodia is hard and by most measures, the country sits at the lower end of development metrics. Yet, Cambodia was once, just as Singapore is today, the urban centre of Southeast Asia, housing Angkor as the largest pre-industrial city of the world. At the height of the Khmer civilisation between the ninth and 13th centuries, the Angkor complex housed an approximate 600,000 to upwards of one million persons. London, by comparison during the Middle Ages, was approximately 60,000. The architectural form of its large religious struc-ture, Angkor was built precisely around, just as in Singapore, its most critical resource: water. Constructed in a formal arrangement of moats and reservoirs, the temple depends on its close proximity to Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve, South-east Asia’s largest freshwater lake, a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) Biosphere Reserve. A vis-ible and complex series of waterworks sustained the massive urban population. The embrace of technology was universal in Angkor’s develop-ment; infrastructure, architecture, and urban configurations channelled stone, food and people, lubricated by its management of water. And yet, the mismanagement and overinfrastructalism of water through dykes, channels and bayons led to the capital’s demise in the centuries that followed. Angkor’s urban configuration, estimated to be approximately 1,000 square kilometres, is slightly larger than the 711 square kilometres that made up Singapore in 20103. A low-rise, relatively high-density configuration for a pre-industrial city, Angkor’s settlement was
1 In 2010, massive flooding occurred on Orchard Road, Singapore’s Premier shopping belt, flooding international brands such as Hermes, Starbucks, and Wendy’s among many retail outlets. Likewise, in the upscale neighbourhoods of Bukit Timah and Thompson Road, flooding destroyed luxury cars in condominium car park basements, trapped residents without power, and produced traffic jams the horror of a city-state predicated on efficiency. 2 http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.04/gibson.html?topic=&topic_set= 3 Evans et al, A comprehensive archaeological map of the world’s largest preindustrial settlement complex at Angkor, Cambodia, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, August 23, 2007
5
compact and concentrated. In contrast, the resulting density of 1,000 persons per square kilometre is only seven times less than Singapore’s population density today, which is,one of the highest national densities currently in the world. A difference of 700 years is also a difference by a factor of seven.
Engineering and mastery of the landscape was integral to the Khmer civilisation. Land was cleared, modified and molded into both an urban, religious and political structure, built on the foundations of an advanced engineering and technological knowledge. Symmetry, geometrical precision and axial coordinates constructed a cityscape based on centralised infrastructural discipline and control. Yet, as Jared Diamond suggests in “Collapse”, the radical transformation of the landscape and replacement of an ecological equilibrium for a centralised technological one led to the capital’s ultimate re-location and final collapse of the civilisation.
paratuses were the zeitgeist of an industrial age. Yet, it was the cruise ship that offered the most direct architectural model; Le Corbusier graphically compared “the Cunarder Aquitania” to that of Notre Dame, Arc de Triomphe, and the Palais Garnier. In his famous chapter, “Eyes Which Do Not See” in Towards a New Architecture, the proclamation “A house is a machine for living in” sits adjacent to the photograph of the Lamorichier (Cie Tranatlantique) cruise liner. Likewise, “architecture is the masterly, correct and magnificent play of masses brought together in light” subtitles the photograph of the “Empress of Asia” Canadian Pacific cruise liner. For Le Corbusier, “The house of the earth-man is the expression of a circumscribed world. The Steamship is the first stage in the realization of a world organised according to the new spirit.”4
Today, throughout Tonle Sap, there are seemingly random configurations of floating villages, constructed in a locally informal vernacular. As a counter-point to the very symmetry and formal geometry of Angkor Wat and the surrounding temple complexes, the floating village moves with the seasonal monsoons in a more precise equilibrium with their natural surroundings. Though tremendously poor, the inhabitants of these villages nevertheless of-fer intimate knowledge of living on and by the water in simple yet provocative structures. The architecture is compact and relatively dense and, by all means, flexible. Consumption is minimised both by the realities of poverty, but also by the functions of living off the landscape or in this case, waterscape. The water villages serve as a counter-point, both to the formal infrastructural approach to Angkor Wat and its embrace of a centralised infrastructalism. Yes, an architectural reading obscures the social and economic inequity borne by the local inhabitants. However, the water villages create autonomous dwellings, off the grid, yet self-sufficient with the sim-plest of means. Instead of the 12 stories now reaching for the new 35-storey heights typi-cally found in Singapore, the floating villages provide a radical contrast to the continual pressures of development found in Singapore’s self-constructed, land-locked and walledin urban milieu. And ironically, Singapore, in its own desire for defense and autonomy, seeks water independence from its neighbours, recycling its own grey water for drinking and industrial purposes and has recently embraced the small-scale agriculture and fish-farming on its shores as a means for the beginnings of food independence. Clearly, autonomy has found a new relevancy. Le Corbusier, in his search for inspirational models, looked to the automobile, the airplane and the cruise ship. These 6 technological ap-
4
Figure 2, Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture
Cambodia has no such cruise ships. Rather, floating on the massive Tonle Sap Lake, sometimes driven into the lake bed with timber piles, the water villages of Siem Reap conjure imagery of new constellations of living in a hydrological architecture not yet realised – a vision of a distributed field of inhabitation, a gentle carpet of self-initiated construction. The very counter-point to the industrialisation of the sea imagined by Le Corbusier or Kenzo Tange, or Buckminster Fuller incorporated into the Singaporean model of development and growth. And Singapore today, like Angkor 700 years ago, faces its own crisis of
Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture, Dover Publications, Inc, New York, 1986 Reprint 1931 – see pages 92~103
rising sea levels, interior flooding and its own total brace of engineering to solve all ills.
Figure 6. Teo Weiling, Kampongs along Tonle Sap River, 2009
Figure 3. Kenzo Tange, Tokyo Bay Project, 1960
Figure 7. Erik G L’Heureux, “Bali Bizerk” in Exuberant Singapore, 2008
Figure 4. R. Buckminster Fuller, Model of Triton City, 1967 - 20 1/2 x 49 1/2 x 44 5/8 inches National Archives & Records Admin. Lyndon Baines Johnson Library & Museum.
Imagine a Singapore of floating neighborhoods, linked by the sea that surrounds it. Imagine a rising sea, a flooded landscape where land reclamation is replaced by water reclamation; a new low rise, high density fabric of objects and fields, waterscapes and landscapes, farming and production, architecture and autonomy, all inspiring a future that Singapore long ago replaced with the promised of centralized modernism. But all is not lost, a city of individual autonomies, gentle impact, and modifiable architecture is a future that can be found in the lessons from the mirror of Singapore in Cambodia.
Figure 6. Erik G L’Heureux, Exuberant Singapore: Low Rise, High Density in the Singapore Straits, 2008
Assistant Processor, Erik G. L’Heureux, AIA LEED AP
Figure 5. Le Corbusier, Unite d’Habitation, 19471952
Editor Department of Architecture National University of Singapore
7
Thoughts
Visions of the untouched virgin landscape of the Tonle Sap and the ruins of what used to be the majestic Angkor Wat instils a curious sense of reminisce and forebode in relation to Singapore’s past and potential future. Speckled kampong settlements of stilted houses line the way along the distributaries of the Tonle Sap lake; creating pockets of civilization on the oblate landscape, only to morph into a decapitated ‘floating’ village during the wet season from may-october annually. Despite this drastic 6 to 8 metre increase in water level, housing typology in the area has adapted to suit both climate changes ideally. In a similar fashion, the early kampongs of Singapore adapted to the climate and soft marine clay soil conditions by planting deep foundation stilts into the ground to raise the houses above water level to prevent flooding. In present day, the advancement of Singapore’s cosmopolitan image ‘progresses’ beyond the simple technology of passive design in the past in substitution for modern western design ideals; leading to the dilution of culture and heritage our forefathers left behind. In this light, knowingly or unknowingly, Singapore has begun to divorce itself from its own original hydroscape of a small undulating landscape surrounded by seawater surging with vibrancy; in replacement for a self contained capsule city. Wandering around the ruined grounds of the Angkor Wat presented the gravity of the issue - importance of water in relation to sustenance and continuity of inhabitation of a city. The Urban planning for the layout of the Angkor Wat and other minor temples strongly reflects their dependence on water as a resource through the proximity of location to water sources and the presence of moats. For a city such as Singapore possessing no natural fresh water resource for portability; Singapore’s Architecture and Urban design reflects our struggling need for fresh water. Without careful hydrological planning and management, Singapore could face the same demise as the ancient Angkor civilization. Felicia Goh
8
“Where are you from?” He finally asked after following me around for awhile. “Singapore.” “Ooh…” He nodded with apparent familiarity, though he never mentioned anything about it again. He told me his name was Sith. He seemed to be in his late-teens and had very tanned skin, not unlike everyone else sitting around in that temple ruins. He was half-clutching his messenger bag in front of him throughout our whole conversation. I only realized this when it was over. He asked me if I want to know about the story of the temple we were in. Slightly surprised that anyone local was actually offering his knowledge without asking me to buy a book or a drink, I agreed. “This temple is called West Mebon,” he started before telling me a string of facts from the name of the king who commissioned the construction of that temple, to the exact year when the French took the statue of Vishnu formerly situated in the middle of the temple to put it in a museum in Phnom Penh. His English was pretty fluent, though he sometimes mispronounced certain words and would try his best to repeat them until they sounded correct. The locals sitting behind us seemed to be listening, trying to figure out what we were talking about. They shouted out to him in Khmer now and then. He replied without looking at them. He then told me a story about crocodiles that were bred in the temple compounds which I can vaguely recall now. I started to ask him about himself. He said he was 21 years old, and that he was studying in a high school. He walked all the way from the nearest town, across the vast West Baray, to the small hill the temple was located at. He would have had to take a boat if it wasn’t dry season. He said the water level would go up and fill the temple compound with water in the wet season. That explained the few small boats apparently stranded in the middle of rice fields around the
temple. He took out a small notebook from his bag and asked me to take a look. Inside he wrote in English various scientific terms, historical facts and other school homework. Aside from a few misspellings and grammatical mistakes, there were surprisingly many subjects included. He listed them out in succession as I flipped through the notebook. I noticed a few pages were torn out and different handwritings started to appear at the back, stating names and places. He then asked me to write my name and my e-mail address. “E-mail address? So you have an e-mail address?” I asked. He grinned and said: “No, I have home address.” He flipped to a page where he wrote: my name is Mik Sith my address I live in Kouk Thnot village Kouk Chork commune Siem Reap district Siem Reap province Number house 0150 group g I am very glad to meet you here I am a student study at high school Don’t forget me Sith I wish you to have a good luck and a good health to successful for you He tore the page out and gave it to me. I realized he had prepared a few pages with the same writings. That was his name card. He then took out a book from his bag and tried to sell it to me.
Oscar Goldron Korintus 9
An urban built-up area does not accommodate water, but ironically it has to sustain its inhabitants with it. Here i learnt of the relationship between country, man and water. In Singapore’s scenario: Buying, collecting and renewing became answers to its water woes. An answer that becomes a neverending balance of supply and demand between the 3 factors.
Cambodia represents a melting pot of hydro-environments yet to be discovered. Singapore reflects a technological forefront for water management much sought by other cities. Probably an equivalent comparison for our western counterparts are Venice versus Amsterdam. Yet not all parameters equate beyond the bare necessity of water.
July 2010, a pseudo river is created in Punggol as a re-creation of the old fishing village, reminiscing connections with water. Capitalistic re-invention of the past seems to be redefining the architecture of Singapore. Water in Singapore is not a resource, but becomes sold as a commodity.
Stark differences between the two ways of hydrological management and their apparent pros and cons are cleverly evident between Singapore and Cambodia. The hard. Dictative controlling of water with a considerable factor for safety. Architectural boundaries are clearly defined and millions are sunk into engineered infrastructure in construction and maintenance. The soft. Everything flows with the water, what is clear is the extent of changes but all becomes muddy when details are looked into. Materiality and construct becomes important as the environment is considered.
Singapore’s approach is hard. Water is contained by tubes,locked by reservoirs and tanks. People go against the way of natural hydrology. Cambodia comes to life with water.Water brings about large changes in Cambodia’s ecology, at the same time improving hygiene through provision of clean water. Architecture treads along with the changing water lines as its foundation. Water functions urbanistically as streets connecting everyones lives; As roads connecting villages; As offices where work resides; As a self-cleansing chute; As an environ defining the land.
Be it to control water or to allow for water as a hydrological agent of change, these are but urbanistic limits of water control. Hydrology clearly defines an urbanscape, and Cambodia has clearly reflected that current urbanistic planning seem to divorce water and water systems as a seperate parameter to urban growth on a city scale.
On a smaller scale it becomes peoples’ multi-purposed space- restroom,kitchen, yard and even tub. Homes are reduced to just a bedroom. Personal privacy is achieved by jumping into the water. Water drives every change in Cambodia. The approach is soft. Angkor: Each ancient Angkorian building intricately reinforces its relationship with water be its pool,moat or pond. Drainage systems within buildings like Bayon Temple are hidden rather than shown and clearly planned into their foundations and construct. Several of these buildings interact directly with water and their environment. Here, water functions beyond survival, recreational and symbolical extents but becomes an added dimension in Khmer architectural-scape: one which contemporary architecture have yet to include across such scales. 10
Huang Jun Cheng
“A sailing ship opens up the sea, but unlike a bulldozer, it doesn’t hurt the sea.” Buckminster Fuller As opposed to structures on land where foundations go deep into the ground and claim territory, people living in the floating villages have a different perspective. What they truly own are their boathouses and not the water on which they float. This is only one of the many differentiations between Singapore and Singaporeans, and Tonle Sap and its folk. In Singapore, water is viewed as an exterior, a separate entity that exists around the island. Potable water is available in our homes, far from its source, whereas in Tonle Sap water is provided for and by the lake, raw and in abundance. There is a resultant sense of detachment between water and the individual in Singapore, where the rise and fall of the tides is duly noted, and our reservoirs are part of the landscape for private golf courses. And then there is Tonle Sap, where every room in the house opens to water, where a wash or a spot of fishing is steps away.
Singapore, on the other hand, would seem fortunate for not having to suffer from any drastic changes in its natural environment, and it was only in recent news that several areas on the island had been hit by flash floods. A plausible reasoning is the commencing failure of our drainage networks. So similar to the Angkor empire, an island with no freshwater sources plants a network of water by manmade design onto the existing landscape to prosper itself. Whether something so unnatural can hold for long is still up for debate. We have forty five years behind us. Angkor had four hundred. Perhaps this is why their people now exist so amicably with the water. We still have three hundred or so years to straighten our gig; or the same amount of time to build taller towers.
The people of Tonle Sap live off the lake and its yields- they are dependent on the water. Its intimate role in their daily lives makes the water’s primary purpose to give life instead of supporting it, and for this reason the people learn to live with the lake and its temperaments, and they do what they must to keep their place on it. The floating villages of Tonle Sap rest on bamboo poles and empty drums to stay afloat. Some are on three storey high stilts to keep their homes dry when the water level rises. It is also the lake that dictates their lifestyles. In the wet season fishing becomes the main source of income and when the water retreats they focus on rice cultivation, which is mostly irrigated by the receding lake. Tonle Sap had taught them adaptability, and with their limited means, the simple workability of their knowledge is made marvelously clear.
Lynette Lim Ng Geok Han Pek Ling Yong 11
1
1
Singapore’s and Cambodia’s history is predicated on water’s importance. One has water surrounding land, the other has land surrounding water. The negotiations with the two physical matter, whether through natural phenomenon or human intervention, are documented with specific attention to define the coastlines of Singapore and the Tonle Sap Lake. Physical scapes are compared against man-made water infrastructure in terms of what each can bear for the place and people. Sometimes infrastructure is built to adapt the changes of the landscapes, other times, landscapes are fabricated to adapt to the need of more infrastructure. The symbiotic relationship between water, land, people and architecture becomes kinetic through seasons and years. 13
Cambodia Singapore Equator
location
Location on world map location
Location on world map 14
National Boundary TIbetan Plateau
Cambodia
Mekong River
China Dali Kunning
Myanmar Vietnam Hanoi
Laos Luang Prabang
Vientiane
Savannakhet
Thailand
Pakse
Bangkok
Cambodia
Siem Reap
Stung Treng Kratie
Gulf of Thailand Phnom Penh
Ho Chi Minh City
South China Sea Major Cities/Towns Along the Mekong River 15
Cambodia
Angkor Wat 13°24′45″N 103°52′0″E
Singapore 1°22'0”N 103°47'60”E 710.3km² 710km
137km
1350km
181,035km²
Equator
Latitude and Altitude 16
181,035km²
255 X
710.3km²
=
Size 17
Mekong River
Early alluvial era (~6000 years ago)
Marine Lake
South China Sea
Lower Mekong Delta (Alluvial Plains) formed from sand and silt deposited by the Mekong River
Geological Formation of Cambodia and The Lower Delta 18
Mekong River
Present Day
Tonle Sap
Marine Lake
Alluvial Plains (Flatland formed from sediment deposition)
South China Sea
Tonle sap is a remnant of a huge marine lake
Geological formation of Tonle Sap 19
Over 1000m 200 - 1000m 100 - 200m 0 - 100m
Dangrek Mountains Central Highlands Cardamom Mountains
Gulf of Thailand
South China Sea
Topography of Lower Mekong Basin 20
>500m 600m 400m 300m 200m 100m 0m above sea level 0m
political ocean boundary
>500m 600m 400m 300m political ocean 200m boundary 100m 0m above sea level 0m
Topography of Cambodia 21
Sources: http://www.canbypublications.com/maps/simpleprov.htm
11
20 10
21
24
6
7 12 5 23
22
8 9
4
19
15
13
17 14 16
18
2 1
3
1. Krong Preah Sihanouk
5. Kampong Thum
13. Phnom Penh
19. Kampong Spueu
6. Siem Reap
14. Kandal
20. Stueng Treng
7. Battambang
15. Kampong Cham
21. Rotanak Kiri
8. Pursat
16. Svay Rieng
22. Mondol Kiri
9. Kampong Chhnang
17. Prey Veaeng
23. Kracheh
10. Banteay Mean Chey
18. Takeo
24. Preah Vihear.
2. Kampot 3. Krong Kaeb 4. Kaoh Kong
11. Otdar Mean Chey 12. Krong Pailin
Provinces and Landform 22
Source: Mekong River Commission Secretariat
China
16%
Myanmar
2%
Thailand
18%
Laos
35%
Cambodia
18%
Vietnam
11%
Percentage Contribution to Annual Mekong River Discharge 23
NE monsoon (dry)
Bay of Bengal
avg wind speed 2km/h
SW monsoon (wet)
Jan
Feb
South China Sea
Mar
dry season
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
wet season
Seasonal Monsoons in Cambodia 24
flood
(2000) 7068 destroyed
3,448,629 affected
347 dead
30% destroyed
drought (2002)
2,017,340 affected
70% destroyed
waterborne epidemics: dengue,diahorrea, cholera,typhoid
> 10,000,000 affected
> 1000 anually
Disasters and Waterborne Epidemics 25
Source: Natural Resource Endowments and Production Prospects
2500 mm
1800 mm
1500 mm
1350 mm
1200 mm
Comparison of Water level to a 1.8m figure
Average Annual Rainfall in 2002 26
4-8m/s avg3000mm/yr 20-40°C
0-2m/s avg1200-1900mm/yr 15-40°C
6-11m/s avg1500-3000mm/yr 20-25°C
6-20m/s avg1500-3000mm/yr 20-32°C
Cambodian locational atmosphere
annual monthly avg:
115mm
dry season avg: 25mm
wet season avg: 95mm
250 200 150 100 50 0mm * Height of ancient architecture aided in weather predictions in rainy seasons as they provided faraway views across the flat plains of Cambodia.
Cambodian annual avg rainfall:
1000-2500mm Rainfall(2010) 27
Tonle Sap Mekong River
Phnom Penh
Reverse Flow Phenomenon
Mekong River Discharge
27,121 m3/s
Backflow into Tonle Sap
20%
To South China Sea
80% Reverse Flow Phenomenon During Wet Season 28
Tonle Sap Mekong River
Phnom Penh
Extent of Flood
Mekong River
53% Tonle Sap River
47%
To South China Sea
3000 m3/s Change in Flow Direction of Tonle Sap River at the End of Wet Season 29
Chong KneasThe Northern edge of Tonle Sap.
30
Tonle SapAn afternoon storm.
31
2500km 2 permanent lake area in dry season
32
source: Mekong River Commission, 2003 contours based on Japan International Cooperation Agency map c1997
15000km 2 maximum expanded area in wet season
33
Aerial view of Siem Reap, Cambodia.
34
35
>
3 x
2500km²
710km²
>
15000km²
36
20 x
710km²
source: Cambodia National Mekong Committee, 2007
1.3km3 volume of lake in dry season
52% Tonle Sap river
30% tributaries
13% rainfall 5% Mekong floodplains
75km3 volume of water contained in lake and floodplain in wet season
37
38
dec
nov
oct
sep
aug
jul
jun
may
apr
mar
feb
40 400
30 300
20 200
10
100
0
0
mean monthly rainfall (mm)
jan ‘06
daily temperature (°C)
nov
sep
jul
may
mar
jan ‘02
nov
sep
jul
may
mar
jan ‘01
lake depth (m) source: Aquatic Sciences Vol.68, 2006
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Kampong KhleangA man wades in waist deep water as he fishes.
39
Lake Toba Indonesia
Songkhla Lake Thailand
Tonle Sap Cambodia
3 Largest Freshwater Lakes in Southeast Asia 40
sources: worldlakes.org; Jintanugool, Round, 2005
Tonle Sap Cambodia 12°53’N 104°04’E Freshwater Lake Max. Depth: 9m Volume: 1.3 to 75km³ Surface Area: 2500 to 15000km² Water Level Changes: 8m
Lake Toba Indonesia 2°68’N 98°88’E Volcanic Caldera Lake Max. Depth: 505m Volume: 240km³ Surface Area: 1103km² Water Level Changes: 1m
Songkhla Lake Thailand 7°12’N 100°28’E Coastal Freshwater Lagoon Max. Depth: 2.5m Volume: 1.6km³ Surface Area: 1082km² Water Level Changes: 1m
#1, #2, #3 largest lakes in South East Asia 41
comparing surface area:
average depth:
Tonle Sap
5m
2500km²
0.52m 15000km²
Lake Toba
x126
1103km²
Songkhla Lake
217.59m
42
1082km² 1.48m
Tonle Sap
comparing volume:
1.3km³
Lake Toba
75km³
Songkhla Lake
240km³
1.6km³
43
0 - 35% 35 - 52% 52 - 70% 70 - 100%
Percentage of Jungle Cover in Cambodia 44
18,000,000 ha Total Land Area of Cambodia
73% Jungle Area in 1961 13.2 million ha
Destroyed Jungle
55% Jungle Area in 2007 10 million ha
Loss of Jungle cover in Cambodia 45
Agricultural Land as a Percentage of Total Land Area
19%
35,000 km2 1961
13% 24,000 km2 1973
25%
30%
45,000 km2 2000
55,000 km2 2007
Increase in Agricultural Land in Cambodia 46
Mekong Basin
Percentage of Country’s Land Area Within Mekong Basin
China (Yunnan)
41%
Myanmar
3.5% Laos
85%
Thailand
36%
Cambodia
85% 20% Vietnam
47
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT
48
Area of flooded forest around Tonle Sap in 1976 49
62% reduction of flooded forest
Area of flooded forests in dry season in 2002 Area of inundation in wet season
50
-1.53% of Area Per Year
Shrunken Area of flooded forests around Tonle Sap 51
Area of flooded grasslands in dry season in 2002 Area of inundation in wet season
52
002
Area of Flooded Grasslands Around Tonle Sa
Area of Flooded Grasslands around Tonle Sap 53
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT
113% increase in shrublands from 1973 - 1993
Area of flooded shrubs in dry season in 2002
Ex 54
+5.7% of Area Per Year
Expanded Area of Flooded Shrublands Around Tonle Sap
Expanded Area of Flooded Shrublands around Tonle Sap 55
1° 18' N
103° 50' E
710.3 km²
Land Area 56
1819 : 0%
1960 : 0.6%
1970 : 1.4%
1980 : 6.9%
1990 : 9.5%
2000 : 18.1%
2009 : 22.9%
Land Expansion 57
58
: 0m to 15m to 30m 30m : 15m 15m to to 30m 30m : 15m 15m to : 30m 30m to to 60m 60m : 30m 30m to to 60m 60m 60m : above above 60m
60m : above above 60m
Topography Topography
Topography Topography 59
60
Water Bodies 61
Source: Singapore. Public Utilities Board. Local Catchment Water. 25 Jun. 2010 <http://www.pub.gov.sg/water/Pag
21
20
18 19
13
2
11
8
1
9 6
10 5
12
4 3 1 15
62
0 <http://www.pub.gov.sg/water/Pages/LocalCatchment.aspx>.
14 8
17
9
16
6 5 7 4 1 15 Singapore: Pandan Reservoir
Poyan Reservoir
Singapore: Murai Reservoir Kranji Reservoir Singapore: PandanJurong Reservoir Reservoir Tengeh Reservoir Lake Reservoir Poyan 1.Pandan Reservoir 10.Poyan Reservoir KranjiMacRitchie Reservoir Sarimbun Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Murai 2.Kranji Reservoir Pulau Tekong Reservoir 11.Murai Reservoir Upper Pierce Reservoir Jurong Lake Reservoir Tengeh Reservoir Marina Reservoir Lower Pierce Reservoir 3.Jurong Lake Reservoir 12.Tengeh Reservoir MacRitchie Reservoir Sarimbun Reservoir Serangoon Reservoir Reservoir 4.MacRitchie Reservoir Upper Bedok Pierce Reservoir 13.Sarimbun Pulau Tekong Reservoir Reservoir Punggol Reservoir Upper Seletar Reservoir Lower Pierce Reservoir 5.Upper Pierce Reservoir Marina Reservoir 14.Pulau Tekong Reservoir Lower Seletar Reservoir Bedok Reservoir Serangoon Reservoir 6.Lower Pierce Reservoir 15.Marina Reservoir Upper Seletar Reservoir 16.Serangoon Punggol Reservoir 7.Bedok Reservoir Reservoir Johor Bahru: Lower Seletar Reservoir 17.Punggol Reservoir Tebrau River 8.Upper Seletar Reservoir Scudai River 9.Lower Seletar Reservoir Pontian Reservoir
Johor Gunung Bahru:Pulai Reservoir Johor Tebrau Bahru:River Source of Water Catchment Supply Scudai River 18.Tebrau River Pontian Reservoir 19.Skudai River Gunung Pulai Reservoir
20.Pontian Reservoir 21.Gunung Pulai Reservoir
Source of Water Catchment Supply
Source of Water Catchment Supply 63
Source: The Business Times, 29 June 2010
Water Catchments by 2060
2060
2011
60%
90%
421.8 km²
632.7 km² Water Catchment Area
Water Catchments 64
Inland Water Bodies Seawater Land
Area 36 km² 646 km² 776 km²
2% 44% 53%
Volume
Seawater
65.7%
26.68 km³
Earth
13.90 km³
34.3%
Area and Volume of Land and Water Mass 65
East Going Current 66
West Going Current 67
Source: Pang, Wei-Chong and Pavel Tkalich.“Modeling Tidal and Monsoon Driven Currents in the Singapore Strait.” Singapore Maritime and Port Journal, 151-162. 2003. 1 Jul. 2010 <http://www.porl.nus.edu.sg/Drplink/PDF/MPAJ-02.PDF>. Speed of current (m/s) 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30
Resultant current
0.25 East going current
0.20 0.15
West going current
0.10
Northeast monsoon
0.05 Southwest monsoon
0.00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Months
Speed of Currents Height of Tides (m) 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 High tide
0.05
Low tide 0.00 Mar
Jun
Sep
Dec
Months
Height of Tides 68
NEWater pumped back into system - 208000 m³/day non-potable for industrial usage - 38000 m³/day indirect potable to reservoirs
Outfall
Outfall
6000mm 3300mm
Water Treatment Plant
Primary and Secondary Sewerage Pipes 69
<?>
: 10,000 m3 / day
NEWater Plant 70
Capacity Generation of NEWater
<http://www.water-technology.net/projects/tuas/> accessed 22/07/2010
: 10,000 m3 / day
Desalination Plant
Desalination Capacity Generation 71
106 Fish Farms
Fish Farms 72
Fish Farming 2010
3260 Fish Farms Density : 9 farms/km² Average fish farm : 20,000m² = 1800kg of fish/day Total fish produced = 1800 X 3260 = 5,868,000kg of fish/day Total fish consumption in Singapore : 274,000kg/day
Fish Farms
Projection of Fish Farms Occupying All of Seaspace 73
Shipping Anchorage Port Limit 74
Shipping Anchorage and Port Limit
National Environmental Agency meteorogical services
2400 and over 2300-2400 2200-2300 2100-2200 Less than 2100
Annual average rainfall
Height (mm) 3000
2000
1000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mean monthly rainfall
Singapore rainfall data 75
2/3 Rainwater collected by the catchments
1000m
1000m
Annual Volume of rainwater
1,651,250,510m3
Singapore Rainwater 76
Total Land Area if Total Population = Population X Dwelling Area lived in 1 storey building = 4,987,600 X 50m² = 249,380,000m²
Projected Total Volume of = Habitable Land Area X Rainfall per Annum Rainwater Collection = 249,380,000m² X 2.4m = 598,512,000m³
Self-sustainability through Rainwater Collection 77
1
2
The hydrological landscape of Cambodia has spawned an economy of water that has profound impact on the livelihood of its people. Both environmental and seasonal changes have produced ebbs and flows in the productivity of its agriculture dependent communities. Being at the mercy of nature, both Singapore and Cambodia are drawing on the potential of its limited or unlimited resource- water- to sustain itself in the future. Research statistics and diagrams illustrate the fragility of these economies and pursue the ramifications of future hydrological developments.
79
Population within Basin
(each representing 2 x 106 people) Land area within basin National Boundary
74,300,000 Total Population of Mekong Basin
China(Yunnan) 4.75
Myanmar 0.75
Laos 2.25
Thailand 14
Cambodia 4.5 Vietnam 11.5
Mekong Basin Populations 80
source: United Nations Population Division, 2008
Singapore
Southeast Asia
24
1,496
39
77
6,247
123
131
7,645
170
2050(Projected)
2005
1950
Cambodia
Population Density (Population per km²) 81
Khmer Rouge period
source: World Bank, 2010
14M 12M 10M 8M
Cambodia 14,562,008
6M Singapore 4,839,400
4M
2008
2000
1990
1980
1970
1960
2M
Total Population
1960
Cambodia
1980
2008
6.3 5.63 2.91
Singapore
5.45
1.74 1.28
World
4.91
3.71 2.54 Births per Woman
82
source: World Bank, 2010
Cambodia
Singapore
World
61
81
69
Life Expectancy at Birth (2008)
69
2
46
Infant Mortality Rate (2008) Number of infants dying before reaching one year of age, per 1000 live births.
90
3
67
Child Mortality Rate (2008) Probability per 1000 that a newborn baby will die before reaching age of five.
Cambodia
Singapore
10,000
139,000
Net Migration (2005) Annual number of immigrants minus total number of emigrants. Each suitcase represents 10,000 people.
83
Source: http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/facts.htm
90% Khmer 5% Vietnamese 5% Chinese Very small percentages of hill tribes, Chams, Burmese, Thai
75% Singaporean Singaporean & PRs 75% 25% Non-citizens Non-citizens & non PRs 25% & non-PRs
Demography 84
All figures for 2008, source: National Institute of Statistics, 2008
60,707km²
181,035km²
33.5% percentage of land area of the provinces adjacent to Tonle Sap over total land area of Cambodia
3,340,217
14,562,008
22.9% percentage of population of the provinces adjacent to Tonle Sap over total population of Cambodia
85
Otdar Meanchey
110
Preah Vihear
12.5
Banteay Meanchey
102 Siem Reap
87
Battambang
87
Kampong Thom
51 Pursat
31 Kampong Chhnang
85
Koh Kong
10
Kampong Speu
102
Pre
1
Kampot
Kandal
110
350 Takeo
240
86
Stung Treng
10 Preah Vihear Rattanak Kiri
12.5
14
Kampong Thom
Kratie
Mondul Kiri
29
4
51
Kampong Cham
Kampong Chhnang
171
85
Svay Rieng
160
Speu
Population Density Prey Veng
190
Population per km². Each person figure represents 10 people per 1km².
Kampot Kandal
110
350 Takeo
240 Population density in each province in Cambodia 87
Phnom Penh The average rent for a 3 room apartment costs around 900 USD per month in Phnom Penh.
88
89
Toa Payoh, Singapore Average rent for a 3 room apartment is 2500 SGD, about 1785 USD.
90
91
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators
Cambodia
Singapore
GDP per capita
US$714
US$36,490
can support
51 x
GDP (2008) 92
GDP per capita (2009) 93
The Happy Planet Index (HPI) is an index of human well-being and environmental impact that was introduced by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) in July 2006. The Index is designed to chalenge well-established indices of countries’ development, such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the Human Development Index (HDI), which are seen as not taking sustainability into account. In particular, GDP is seen as inappropriate, as the usual ultimate aim of most people is not to be rich, but to be happy and healthy.
Happy Planet Index : Indicator for Gross National Happiness 94
Happy Planet Index (2009) 2009
95
10% Others -remittances -tourism
4% Petty Trade
1% Non-farm labour
2% Agriculture -rice -maize -sweet potato
83% Livestock -fish -chicken -crocodile
. Primary Fishing . Secondary Fish processing, animal rearing, agriculture
Income distribution of Income distribution typical household in Tonle Sap of a typical household living in Tonle Sap 96
29% ceremonial expenses -buddhist events -family weddings -festivals
7% Agriculture purchase
17% Livestock purchase
5% Household expenses
28%
14%
Transport cost -capital cost of motorcycles
Health Cost
(147,990 motorcycles 17.8% of cambodia)
Percentage of total expenditure of a typical household living in Tonle Sap 97
<http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/themes/people/hes.pdf>, accessed 30/06/2010
Clothing
Food
Housing
Health Others Education Transportation
Recreation + Culture
Communication
Total Income : $4388
Singapore Household Expenditure for 2008 98
Chong Khneas Situated at is thesituated mouth ofat Siem River The village the Reap mouth of Siem Reap river.
99
Siem ReapA tank of cooking gas in Cambodia can cost up to an average of 35 USD, resulting in 95% of the population turning to biomass fuels –waste, charcoal and wood –for cooking.
100
Siem Reap Psar Chaa market
Siem Reap market
101
2350 km2
Community Fishing Lots
2625 km2
Commercial Fishing Lots
262.5 km2
Fish Sanctuary
8375 km2
Floodplain
2500 km2
Tonle Sap Lake
Fishery Management 102
Market Location Main Road Secondary Roads
Roads Linking Markets and Fishing Lots 103
Tributary of Tonle Sap.
104
105
1000
100
800
80
600
60
400
40
200
20
0
Percentage of Income (%)
Water Level (cm)
Source: Livelihood Sustainability Analysis of the Floating Villages of the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia, Malin Meinander, 2009
J
A
S
O
N
D
2001 Jan
2000 May
0 J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
Water level
Income level
Water level 106
V.S
Income level
Source:Livelihood Sustainability Analysis of the Floating Villages of the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia, Malin Meinander, 2009
Reasons:
Receding floods result in a migration of fish from the floodplains to the lake and the Mekong River. This is the most productive fishing period of the year.
The main rice crop is harvested every year few months after the flooding has brought water and fertile silt to the rice fields. 107
Livelihood Sustainability Analysis of the Floating Villages of the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia,
Number of fish catch per person 108
Tonle Sap 1.5 million people living around Tonle Sap fish for a living, but over fishing and pollution has led to shrinking of fish stocks and increasing poverty.
109
Fish catch in Tonle Sap Lake was in 2007.
250,000,000kg
Therefore, fish catch of 250,000,000kg can satisfy of Singapore population.
110
2.5X
Kampong KhleangHand-made fishing traps.
Kampong Khleang channel
111
Fishing and fish consumption is far more important in the vicinity of the lake than elsewhere in Cambodia.
75% (median) Percentage at which fish constitutes the animal protein intake of the fishing communities
112
Source:Natural Resources and Rural Livelihoods in Cambodia, Cambodia Development Resource Institute, 2002
90% ofin animal protein intake Cambodia:
Fish catch of
35kg/year/pax
200kg/pax - fish intake of 35kg/pax 165kg/pax/year of fish to sell
Cambodians are left with to the market (Siem Reap).
1 kg
165kg
7,500 Khmer RIEL =
USD 1.80 USD 297
113
1000 km²
40%
520 km²
21%
450 km²
18%
200 km²
8%
Area of Irrigated Land in Each Province 114
Deep Water Rice
Shallow Water Wet
Shallow Water Dry
Swamps
Types of Rice Cultivation in Cambodia 115
5,000,000 tonnes Total Rice Production of Cambodia in 2010
Can feed
4km3 volume of water needed to irrigate crops
=
8 times of Singapore’s annual water consumption
Can flood Singapore with 5.6m of water
Rice Production in Cambodia 116
West BarayIn dry season, the low water level allows the growth of rice on the reservoir bed.
Prek ToalFloating hyacinth are cultivated and harvested for food. 117
government protected water
54.3%
protected wells
22.1%
tube wells for irrigation
19.0%
imported water
5.1%
piped in dwellings
tap water
rainwater
6.1%
1.3%
0.7%
Water Distribution of Cambodia 118
unprotected sources
43.8%
groundwater
28.3%
surface water
15.5%
Water Distribution of Cambodia 119
Kampong KhleangPipes connect the houses to a freshwater source, often groundwater from wells or collected rainwater.
Kampong KhleangRainwater is channelled through gutters and self-made funnels made of old plastic containers throughout the houses of the village. 120
Total Annual Water Consumption of Cambodia
4,080,000,000 m3 Annual Water Consumption Per Capita
309 m3
57.7 m3
Cambodia
Singapore
Water Withdrawal From each Sector as % of Total Water Withdrawal
Cambodia
98.04%
Agriculture
1.471%
Domestic
0.4902%
Industrial
Singapore 4% Agriculture
45% Domestic
51% Industrial
Water Consumption of Cambodia 121
Year
Population
Annual Water Consumption
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Projected water consumption Population and Annual Water Consumption 2050
= 100,000 people = 10,000,000 m³
700,000,000 m³
Singapore’s Population and Annual Water Consumption 122
2050 2040 2030 2020 2010 2000 1990 1980 1970 1960
= 10 m³ of water
(actual volume)
= 10 m³ of water
( predicted volume)
Singapore’s Annual Water Consumption per Capita 123
Breakdown of Annual Water Supply
2009 40% Imported water 30% Domestic Catchments 20% NEWater 10% Desalination
2060
50% NEWater
30% Desalination 15% Domestic Catchemnts 5%
Imported water
2070 70% Non-Domestic
30% imported Domestic No water
124
Imported raw water
Water treatment
Desalination
NEWater
RM 0.03 per 1000 gallons
RM 2.4 per 1000 gallons
RM 7.42 per 1000 gallons
RM 3.71 per 1000 gallons
1000 gallons = 4.546m3
Cost of Water Supply 125
Singapore- Malaysia Water Talks
1961 Agreement (expires in 2011)
390,956m3 of raw water per day
12% of imported water (treated)
1962 Agreement (expires in 2061)
1,136,500m3 of raw water per day
2% of imported water (treated)
Singapore-Malaysia Water Agreement 126
2
3 5
4
Malaysia to Singapore Water Pipes 1 Gunung Pulai Reservoir 2 Pierce Reservoir 3 Marina Bay Indonesia to Singapore Gas Pipes 4 Palau Batam 5 Jurong Island
Pipelines for Imported Water and Gas 127
to be corrected
2.4/
RM 1000 gallons
Water Treatment
Treated Water Raw Water
0.5/
RM 1000 gallons
0.03/
RM 1000 gallons
1000 gallons = 4.546m3
Portable water to Johor
3.95/
RM 1000 gallons
Selling prices of water 128
Rainwater Imported raw water NEWater
Reservoir
Water Treatment Plant
Industry
NEWater Plant
Water Reclamation Plant
Domestic Commercial
Sea
Desalination Plant
Waterworks of Singapore 129
Singapore
1989
1993
2006
10.6%
6.5%
5%
1993
2006
72%
6%
Cambodia
Water consumed Water lost
Unaccounted for water is the difference between the actual volume of water in the supply plants and the paid volume of water consumed. 130
Unaccounted for water
60,000,000m3 of water escaped into the atmosphere each year from 30km2 of reservoir surface area
1000 Olympic-sized swimming pool(2500m3 per pool)
Evaporation of water 131
Operating dam Dam under construction Proposed dam
Gongguoqiao
Xiaowan
Manwan Dachaoshan
Nuozhadu Jinghong
Ganlanba Mengsong
Luang Prabang Pak Beng Xayabouri Pak Lay
Pak Chom
Sanakham
Ban Koum Lat Sua Don Sahong Stung Treng
Sambor
Mekong Mainstream Dams 132
Estimated Hydroelectric Power Generated Along the Mekong
366,295 GWh
80,950 GWh 31,739 GWh
Laos
Vietnam
Cambodia
25,634 GWh
Thailand
506,000 GWh Can Power more than 13 Singapores in a year. (Singapore 2010 annual consumption is 37,940 GWh)
Entire Lower Mekong Basin
Hydroelectric Potential in the Lower Mekong Basin 133
Sponsors of the Mekong Dams 134
Mulutang
Soc Son
Hanoi Luang Namtha
How Binh
Ban Mai
Nam Mo
Vienntiane
Na Bon
Ha Tinh
Rangoon Danang
Tha Wong
Nakhon Ratchasima Wang Noi Watthana Nathon Battambang
Bangkok
Pleiku
Stung Treng Sambor
Phnom Penh
Dams Proposed Interconnection Line City/Town National Capital
Proposed Power Grid Connecting the Mekong 135
Sre Pok Stung Tatay
426 GWh Kirirom I
Se San
1065 GWh 60
O Chum II
GWh
10 GWh
Stung Atay
588 GWh
1174 GWh
Kirirom III Lower Stung Russey
656 GWh
70 GWh
Stung Chay Areng
1358 GWh
Kamchay
558 GWh
Sambor
14870 GWh Proposed dam Constructed dam
Hydropower Development Sites in Cambodia Predicted Annual Energy Production at Major Sites 136
to Thailand to Vietnam to Laos Rattanak Kiri Stung Treng
Banteay Meanchey
Siem Reap
Battambang Sambor Pursat Kampong Chhnang
Kratie
Kampong Cham
to Vietnam Kampong Speu
Phnom Penh Prey Veng
Kandal
Takeo Sihanoukville Kampot
150kV 220kV Proposed
Electricity Transmission Lines 137
High tension electrical cables run along a national highway.
138
1500 m3/s
50 m3/s Sambor Dam
Stung Treng
Ban Koum
Thakhek
Amount Discharged for Irrigation Pa Mong
Chiang Khan
Xayaboury
Luang Prabang
Phnom Penh
Kampong Cham
Kratie
Stung Treng
Krone Falls
Pakse
Savannakhet
Vienntiane
Pak Lay
Luang Prabang
Pak Beng
Mekong Profile
1000 30 m3/s m3/s
Downstream Irrigation from Dam Constructions
139
Stung Treng
56m deep Sambor Dam
~18km Kratie Boundary of Reservoir Created
Mekong River Proposed Site of Sambor Dam 140
Source: Mekong Secretariat, 1970
147 km
620km²
24.8%
Area of reservoir created by the Sambor Dam
of the area of Tonle Sap in dry season
Area of Sambor Reservoir 141
19,034 Persons resettled
2000 Homes relocated
24,000,000 m2 of Farmland destroyed
Enough electricity generated to power Cambodia for 9 years
100,000,000 m2 of Land will be irrigated
Upstream and Downstream Effects of Sambor Dam 142
sources: MRC, 2009 U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2007
11,740 GWh expected annual energy production of the Sambor Dam
1,273 GWh 3.93%
1,273 GWh total electricity produced in Cambodia in 2007, of which 3.93% is contributed by hydroelectric power
143
the expected annual energy production of the Sambor Dam can satisfy:
923.7%
15.8%
144
8.8%
655.3%
10,467 GWh (projected value if excess electricity generated by the Sambor Dam is exported)
currently: 0 GWh 167 GWh
535 GWh
3,850 GWh
846 GWh
2,313 GWh
230 GWh 820 GWh
import export
Import/Export of Electricity 145
1
3
Nominated as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in 1997, Tonle Sap exists as the largest freshwater lake in Southeast Asia. Throughout Tonle Sap today exists seemingly random configurations of floating villages configured in a locally informal vernacular.They move with the seasonal monsoons in a precise equilibrium with their natural surroundings. Constructed mappings and photographic evidence will illustrate the inhabitants’ intimate knowledge of living on and by the water in simple yet provocative architecture.
147
Tour boats used to be government owned, rented to boatmen to bring tourists out onto Tonle Sap. A majority are now owned by a private Korean company.
148
13km
Siem Reap
Prek Toal
60km
Chong Khneas
39
km
94k
m
Kampong Khleang
Siem Reap > Chong Khneas > Prek Toal(Overnight) > Kampong Khleang > Chong Khneas > Siem Reap Approximately 219km travelled in total. That’s equivalent to travelling back and forth from Changi Airport to Tuas about 4.5 times.
Travel by the Adjacent Towns to Route Siem Reap by Team Boat 149
Chong Kneas from an elevated viewing outpost.
150
151
0.5
m 2.5
Tonle Sap lake boat 152
m 1
2.5
Tonle Sap lake house Typology Floating House 153
Bundled bamboo as floating aid
m 1
2.5
Construction Details of Floating House Exploded Axonometric 154
m 1
2.5
Floating House Typology at Chong Khneas Axonometric View
m 1
2.5
Floating House Typology at Chong Khneas Axonometric View 155
Chong KneasA man uses water from the lake to prepare his meal.
156
Chong KneasA typical floating home that does not differ much from its landed counterparts in appearance
157
Kampong Khleang, a village of stilted houses.
158
159
Kampong Khleang A landed boathouse.
160
Kampong KhleangThe exposed ground between the water and houses becomes used for agriculture.
161
10
m 25
Tonle Sap Kampong Khleang - Dry Season 162
10
m 25
Chong Khneas Dwellings Arrangement 163
Kampong Khleang The houses follow the curve of the winding tributary.
164
Kampong Khleang
165
Kampong Khleang
166
167
Main Path
Veranda
Living Room
Storage
Section BB’
Bedroom
W.C.
Washing Area Docking Area Kitchen
River
Section AA’ m 1
2.5
Plan of a House at Kampong Khleang 168
Section AA’
Living Space
Storage Space
Storage/Void
Section BB’
Veranda
Living Room/Bedroom
Kitchen/ Wash Area
Storage/Void Main Road
River
m 0.5
1
Section of a House at Kampong Khleang in Dry Season 169
m 1
2.5
Construction Following Grid System Axonometric View 170
m 1
2.5
Bracings and Roof Frames Added Axonometric View 171
Pa th
Ri
ve r
Ma in
m 1
2.5
Floor, Wall, Roof Panels Installed Axonometric View 172
m 1
2.5
Tonle Sap Kampong Khleang Typology Double Pitch Stilt House Horizontal Expansion 173
m 1
2.5
Tonle Sap Kampong Khleang Typology Single Pitch Stilt House 174
Kampong Khleang-
175
Kampong Khleang
176
Kampong Khleang
177
kampong Khleang
178
179
1
4
Eight hundred years ago a people built an empire with timber and stone, leaving behind a legacy of successful attempts to control water, though ultimately they failed. The importance of water to their existence brought about its heavy manipulation and other elements of the given landscape, and over time nature had returned to claim what is hers to control. Through a series of analytical diagrams, the ancient waterworks of Angkor is uncovered.
181
Otdar Meanchey Province
Siem Reap Province
Preah Vihear Province Banteay Meanchey Province
Angkor Kingdom
Siem Reap District
Battambang Province Kampung Thum Province
Pursat Province
Kampung Chhnang Province
Provinces around Tonle Sap 182
=
=
=
Landmass Comparisons 183
Varin Srey Snam
Angkor Chum Svey Leu Kraianh
Angkor Thom
Bantaey Srei
Puok
Prasat Bakong Soutr Nikom
Chi Kraeng
Siem Reap district 13°21′44″N 103°51′35″E
Tonle Sap
Siem Reap Province 184
1 complete refill of west baray
2200m
8000m
depth: 5m
= 88,000,000m3
of freshwater
=
6 years of NEWater production (approximately 40,000m 3 /day)
1x NEWater Factory
Comparison of water supply: Angkor and Singapore 185
Tonle Sap
District Centre Communes 186
Siem Reap Commune Centres
Source: Canby Publications Co., Ltd;2009; Online image http://www.canbypublications.com/maps/provsr.htm; 1Jul’10
Tonle Sap
District Centre Main Highway
Siem Reap Road Infrastructure 187
300m 70m kulen hills
28m
r
ve
ri ok
pu 18m
10m
flood plains
Tonle Sap
Topography Angkor 188
1
2
r
ive
k R
Puo
3
4
1. Great North Channel.Directs water from Puok river to West Baray 2. Seam Reap River. Main channel used for temple construction. Redirects water to East Baray
3. Main water consumption area
4. Water fed out to irrigation canals for rice planting
Water Infrastructural Breakdown 189
Kulen hills
Puok river
Roluos river
Tonle Sap
Angkor Quarry Sites 190
sandstone/laterite sourced from Kulen hills
each piece is pre-measured and cut out
stone masons create holes which allow for smoothening and transportation
stone bricks transported along river to site
slaves use poles to transport and stack bricks
Transport of construction materials 191
Angkor Thom
Siem Reap
Tonle Sap
Dry Season Water Level 192
Angkor Thom
Siem Reap
Tonle Sap
Flooded Plains
Wet Season Water Level 193
Wet Season - May to October
Rice Distribution in Dry & Wet Seasons 194
Upland rice
Wet season rice Deepwater rice Recession rice
Types of rice crops
233,520
23,806
5316
5250
Wet rice season
Dry rice season
Recession rice
Deepwater rice
Average Rice Production 1997-2001 (tonnes)
Rain-fed paddy rice - wet season
1.6 100m
Flood recession rice - dry season
3.0 100m
Comparative Seasonal Rice Yields (tonnes/ha) 195
Tonle Sap
1985-1986
Tonle Sap
1992-1993
Rain & mixed deciduous forest
Flooded forest & marshes
Agriculture
Marshes
Dry mixed deciduous forest
Flooded forest
Land cover 196
Angkor
Population
100,000
Irrigation yield per yr (tonnes)
19,200 0.192
Singapore
Population
5000,000
consumption per yr (tonnes)
27,500 0.055
Rice Yield & Consumption 197
West Baray Priority of water distribution is to ensure multiple harvests in a year.
198
West Baray During the dry season, the baray is used for agriculture.
199
Grass & Rice Fields
Forested Areas
Shrubs
Trees
Types & Distribution of Vegetations(12 C.) 200
Grass & Rice Fields
Forested Areas
Shrubs
Trees
Types & Distribution of Vegetations(21 C.) 201
300-400m
Puok River
60m
S R
3m tonle sap
202
Kulen Hills
Puok River
Siem Reap River
Rolous River
tonle sap
General direction of water flow 203
Natural Water Infrastructure 204
Manmade Water Infrastructure 205
8-9th C.
Late 9th C.
11th C.
Early to Mid 12th C.
Late 12th C.
13th C.
Angkor-Development of Water Management Infrastructure 206
Angkor Wat The temple moat.
207
+28m
+18m
+10m
main water canals topography
Main Water Canals (12C.) 208
Main Water Canals defining Main Roads 209
main roads connecting the key places topography
Main Roads(12C.) 210
main roads secondary roads tertiary roads
Road Network(12C.) 211
West Baray
212
213
Barays
Irrigation
Daily usage
Religion
Hierarchy of Importance 214
Phimeanakas A bathing pool.
Angkor Wat A pool built within the interior of the temple.
215
Angkor
150,000m 3
10 MacRitchie reservoir 15,141m 3
60 olympic pools 2,500m 3
6000 men 0.25m 3
216
Comparison of Water Volume
1000
angkors 150,000m3
Tonle sap 1,300,000,000m3
Comparison of Water Volume 217
710.3km 2
400km 2
Land Area Comparison 218
= 0.74km
2
12 Central Business Districts (CBD)
Land Area Comparison 219
great pyramid of giza 24th C. B.C
200 tonnes
Amount of Stone Used 220
Baphuon A large fraction of the stones used come from the quarries of the Kulen Hills.
221
280m
30m
7m
typical 2-storey shophouse
222
Esplanade Singapore
UOB Plaza
65m
14m
typical stilted houses in kampung kleang
Angkor Wat
Height Comparison 223
Sun Path
N
S
Angkor Wat with N-S Axis 224
Angkor Wat Unlike other religious monuments, the temple does not face the east. The sunrise casts its entrance in shadow.
225
Diagrammatic representation of Mt Meru, the mountain ranges and the cosmic sea
Angkor Wat in Comparison 226
1
2
3
1- moat representing the cosmic ocean 2- bas-reliefs + concentric galleries representing mountain ranges 3- central shrine representing Mount Meru *The layout of Angkor Wat is to exaggerate the approach to the central tower, representative of sacred Mt Meru.
227
Axial Approach into Angkor Wat
300-400m
rice crops
built dykes
60m
tonle sap
flood plains
kulen hills
Tapping on the potential difference resultant of natural topography, water is collected and stored in the dykes.
How Dykes Work 228
West Baray A modern dyke.
229
Preah Khan
Neak Pean
Ta Proh West Mebon Angkor Thom Phnom Bakheng
Angkor Wat
Area of focus within Angkor ruins
Siem Reap District
W
Tonle Sap
230
ah Khan
Neak Pean
Ta Prohm
Angkor Thom
eng
or Wat
Siem Reap District
Dry Ruins
Wet Ruins
or
or
+ moat
tower
mountain
quincux
bathing pool, barays
axial
flanking ponds
sanctuary
medicinal pools
row
Angkor Archaeological Map(2010) 231
Angkor Wat A courtyard within the temple compound.
232
m 500
100
Plan Battle of Gods & Demons
Victory of Krishna
Library Battle of Lanka Central Sanctuary
Victory of Vishnu
Terrace of Honor
Battle of Kurukshetra
Churning of the Ocean of Milk
Library
The Grand Army
Direction of drainage flow
Judgement Heaven & Hell
Angkor Wat 233
Before Rain
234
During Rain
Speculated Rainwater Drainage 235
Typical Section through one of the drains
236
Before Rain
During Rain
drains
Speculated Rainwater Drainage 237
Ta Prohm A type of drainage used in the 12th C. to regulate the water in the temple.
238
Bayon The internal drainage system.
Angkor Wat The external drainage system.
239
600m
Mandarin Hotel
Ngee Ann City
600m
Leng 240
n City
Wisma Atria
Ion
Length Comparison - Angkor Wat & Orchard Rd, Singapore 241
Long axial approach to main building 242
West Mebon
Baphuon
243
Preah Khan A continual axis runs through the temple complex.
Preah Khan
244
100
m 500 Plan
drainage
Preah Khan 245
Preah Khan
246
10
m 50 Plan
drainage
Neak Pean 247
Ta Prohm The trees’ reclaimation of Ta Phrom has left the temple in ruins.
248
10
m 50 Plan
drainage
Ta Prohm 249
Phnom Bakheng
Phnom Bakheng
250
10 drainage
m 50 Plan
Siem Reap river Angkor Thom
West Baray
Phnom Bakheng
Angkor Wat
Water bodies surrounding Phnom Bakheng visible from the temple at its summit
Phnom Bakheng 251
North Gate
Victory Gate Phimeanakas Baphuon
Terrace of the Elephants
West Gate Bayon
East Gate (Gate of the Dead)
South Gate
Central Angkor Thom 252
10
m 50 Plan
Bayon 253
Bayon
254
Bayon
255
current modified path of the river flow original path of the river flow
Location of the dyke failure 256
Bridge under construction
water level in the watertable drops
partial diversion of water
Dyke failure leading to diversion of river flow 257
Ta Phrom
258
Angkor Wat
259
1
Bibliography http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.04/gibson.html?topic=&topic_set= Evans et al, A comprehensive archaeological map of the world’s largest preindustrial settlement complex at Angkor, Cambodia, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, August 23, 2007 Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture, Dover Publications, Inc, New York, 1986 Reprint 1931 – see pages 92~103 “2006 baseline data from the Danida supported NREM Programme 2001 – 2006.” Jun. 2007. Danish International Royal Assistance, Royal Danish Embassy. Jul. 2010 <http://www.cambodiaatlas.com/ map>. cambodiapowerlinesLEFT, cambodiapowerlinesRIGHT Abdallah, S., S. Thompson, J. Michaelson, N. Marks and N. Steuer, et al. “The Happy Planet Index 2.0.” 2009. New Economics Foundation. Jul. 2010 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Planet_Index>. Chapter 1/ 2? , Pek Ling Yong, “HPI 2009.ai” Anthony Milne and Michael Barbetti. “A comprehensive archaeological map of the world’s largest preindustrial settlement complex at Angkor, Cambodia”, 2007. Yale University, New Haven. www. pnas.org_cgi_doi_10.1073_pnas.0702525104. 4 Natural water infrastructure, manmade water infrastructure, main water canals defining main roads “Archaeological Sites in the Angkor Region”, 1994. Department of Angkor Conservation. www.theangkorguide.com. 28Jun’10. 4 Temple ruins and typology Baran, Eric, Peter Starr and Yumiko Kura, eds. Influence of built structures on Tonle Sap fisheries : synthesis report. Phnom Penh: Cambodia National Mekong Committee, 2007. Pp11 tonlesaparea, tonlesaparea2, tonlesapvolume “Cambodia E-visa ,’10- Geography and Climate” “Cambodia Map Resource” http://www.asiatravel-cambodia.com/cambodia-map/, 27Jun’10. 1 Seasonal monsoons and disasters C.Thomas May. “The Angkor Wat Civilisation: A lesson in Sedimentation and Irrigation” 09 Cambodia Province: Expedition Blue Planet,Online provincial information. p42. 4 Provinces around Tonle Sap, Landmass comparison, Angkor vs Tonle Sap & Proximity of Angkor to Tonle Sap. Cambodia. December 1994. AIT-UNEP Regional resource centre for Asia and the pacific. http://www. rrcap.unep.org/lc/cd/html/countryrep/cambodia/content.html. 4 Vegetation 1986-1993 Campbell, Ian C., Colin Poole, Giesen Wim and Valbo-Jorgensen John. “Species diversity and ecology of Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia.” Aquatic Sciences 68, 17 Jan 2006. Pp358 tonlesapdepthdat Chapter 2, Section B, “National Resource Endowments and Production Prospects”. World Food Programme Food Security Atlas of Cambodia, 2009. C1-25 Flooded Forest Area 1976, C1-27 Flooded Forest Area 1997 RIGHT, C1-29 Flooded Grassland Area, C1-31 Flooded Shrub Area Chia Lin Sien. Singapore’s Urban Coastal Area : Strategies for Management. Manila: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, 1992. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, Singapore Topography Chua, Grace. “This powder could help save 8,000 swimming pools of water a year.” The Straits Times. 2 Jul. 2010. File name: Water evaporation CIA – The World Factbook. 2010. Central Intelligence Agency. Jul. 2010. <https://www.cia.gov/ library/publications/the-world-factbook/>. samborimportexport Cronin, Richard and Timothy Hamlin. Mekong Policy Project, Mekong Tipping Point: Hydropower Dams, Human Security and Regional Stability. Henry L. Stimson Center, 2010. 02-60-LI-Sambor Site Damian Evans, Christophe Pottier, Roland Fletcher§, Scott Hensley¶, Ian Tapley, David R. “Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Construction History, Cottbus”, p3, May 2009. 20Jul’10. 4 Angkor quarry sites, Transport of construction materials EIA – Independent Statistics and Analysis. 2010. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Jul. 2010. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/>. samborproduce Erik L’Heureux Atelier. “Singapore Transcripts,Cambodia: Facts,Figures & Statistics” Thesis research. National University of Singapore, 2009-2010. 1 Relative size Erik L’Heureux Atelier. “Singapore Transcripts.” Thesis research. National University of Singa-
261
pore, 2009-2010. 1 Geok Area and Volume of Land and Water, 2 Geok Gas and Water Pipes “Estimate daily NEWater production: General Electric Company for PUB”,2006 http://www.gewater. com/pdf/Case%20Studies_Cust/Americas/English/CS_BEDO_MUNTER_EN_1206_NA_GE_Logo.pdf, 26Jul’10. 4 Water supply: Angkor vs Singapore Evans, Patrick T., Melissa Marschke and Kiran Paudyal. “Flood Forests, Fish, and Fishing Villages.” Asian Forest Network, 2004. Chapter 1/ 2?, Pek Ling Yong, “fish management.ai” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO STAT, ResourceSTAT. Updated 30 Apr. 2009 <http://faostat.fao.org/site/377/default.aspx#ancor>. 02-39-LI-Increase Agriland, C1-25 Flooded Forest Area 1976, C1-27 Flooded Forest Area 1997 RIGHT, C1-29 Flooded Grassland Area, C1-31 Flooded Shrub Area <http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/dbase/index.stm>. 02-40-LI-Rice Production GFA Consulting Group in cooperation with Fraser Thomas. “Kingdom of Cambodia: Tonle Sap Lowland Stabilization Project.” Asian Development Bank, Sep. 2007. Chapter 1/ 2? , Pek lIng Yong, “expense.ai” Hori, Hiroshi. The Mekong: Environment and Development. Tokyo; New York: United Nations University Press, 2000. 02-01-LI-Mekong Area Population, 02-59-LI-Section Mekong Dams, C1-11 Lower Mekong Formation, C1-12 Lower Mekong Formation 2, C1-10 Topography Mekong, C1-15 Reverse Flow 1, C1-16 Reverse Flow 2 http://www.cambodiaevisa.com/geography-climate/, 3Jul’10. 1 Topography Inception Report. MRC Sea for Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream. International Centre for Environmental Management. 13 Dec. 2009. Pp 25. Samborarea, samborproduce, 02-51-LI-Mekong Dams International Rivers Network. “Trading Away the Future: The Mekong Power Grid”. Berkeley, CA., Sep. 2006. 02-53-LI-Mekong Power Grid Jesse Allen. Earth observatory-Angkor,Cambodia. October 31, 2007. American Museum of Natural History’s Science Bulletins and Damian Evans, University of Sydney. http://earthobservatory. nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=8170. 4 Vegatation(past) Jesse Allen. Earth observatory-Angkor,Cambodia. October 31, 2007. American Museum of Natural History’s Science Bulletins and Damian Evans, University of Sydney. http://earthobservatory. nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=8170. 4 Vegetation(now) Kingdom of Cambodia. Ministry of Environment. Cambodia Environment Outlook. 2009. Jul. 2010 <http://geodata.rrcap.unep.org/all_reports/cambodia_081010.pdf>. Chapter 2, Pek ling Yong, “pop data whole country.ai” & “pop data whole country 2.ai” Kingdom of Cambodia. Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology. 2000. Jul. 2010 < http://www. mowram.org/>. Chapter 1/2?, Pek Ling Yong, “Irri land.ai” LakeNet – World Lakes Network. 2004. World Lakes Network. Jul. 2010 <http://worldlakes.org/>. largestlakes2 Lee Poh Onn. “The Water Issue between Singapore and Malaysia: No Solution in Sight?” Economics and Finance No.1. Jan. 2003. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Jul. 2010 <www.iseas.edu.sg/ ef12003.pdf>. File name: Cost of water supply, File name: Water expenditure Lee Yen Nee. “Singapore-China Farm Plans.” The Straits Times. 22 May 2010. 30 Jun. 2010 <http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_529951.html>. File name (s) 1, Winnie, China Jilin-Sg Food Zone Lim, Jessica. “Kelongs Vanishing Fast in Singapore.” The Straits Times. 28 Sep. 2009. 30 Jun. 2010 <http://wildsingaporenews.blogspot.com/2009/09/kelongs-vanishing-fast-in-singapore.html>. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, Fish farms 2010 Map traced from Japan International Cooperation Agency 1997 topography map from <http://www.cambodiamaps.blogspot.com/>. tonlesaparea, tonlesaparea2 Marks, N., S. Abdallah, A. Simms and S. Thompson, et al. “The Happy Planet Index 1.0.” 2006. New Economics Foundation. Jul. 2010 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Planet_Index>. Chapter 1/ 2? , Pek Ling Yong, “HPI.ai” Matti Kummu. The Natural Environment and Historical Water Management of Angkor,Cambodia.2003. Department of Water Resources, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland. http://users. tkk.fi/u/mkummu/publications/kummu_WAC_WashingtonDC_2003.pdf. 4 Types of rice, Distribution of
262
rice( wet & dry) McKenney, Bruce and Prom Tola. Natural Resources and Rural Livelihoods in Cambodia: A Baseline Assessment — Working Paper 23. Phnom Penh: Cambodia Development Resource Institute, 2002. Chapter 2, Pek Ling Yong, “protein intake 2.ai” Meinander, Malin. “Livelihood Sustainability Analysis of the Floating Villages of the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: Perspectives from three case studies.” Master of Science Thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, 2009. Chapter 2, Pek Ling Yong, “protein intake.ai” & “livelihood.ai” & “livelihood reasons.ai” & “fish catch per person.ai” Modified from Rahut et al., 2007 “income dist.ai” Mekong Case Study. UNESCO-IHP; Mekong River Commission Secretariat, 2000. C1-14 Mekong Discharge Michael Freeman. “A Guide to Khmer Temples in Thailand and Laos-Types of temples” p18-19. 1996. Weatherhill. 4 Temple ruins and typology Narisa Chakrabongse. Ancient Angkor. Bangkok: River Books Ltd, 2003. p78-101. 4 Bayon Narisa Chakrabongse. Ancient Angkor. Bangkok: River Books Ltd, 2003. p68-69. 4 Phnom bakheng Narisa Chakrabongse. Ancient Angkor. Bangkok: River Books Ltd, 2003. p136-145. 4 Ta prohm Narisa Chakrabongse. Ancient Angkor. Bangkok: River Books Ltd, 2003. p178-180. 4 Neak pean Narisa Chakrabongse. Ancient Angkor. Bangkok: River Books Ltd, 2003. p170-177. 4 Preah khan Narith, Bun. Project Formulation Document for Hydropower Masterplan Study. JBIC, 2006. 02-54-LICambodia hydropower sites LEFT + 02-55-LI-Cambodia hydropower sites RIGHT National Institute of Statistics of Cambodia. 2009. National Institute of Statistics of Cambodia, Ministry of Planning. July 2010 <http://www.nis.gov.kh/>. Tonlepoppie, Chapter 2, Pek ling Yong, “pop data whole country.ai” & “pop data whole country 2.ai” Navy, Hap and Madhusudan Bhattarai. Economics and livelihoods of small-scale inland fisheries in the Lower Mekong Basin: a survey of three communities in Cambodia. IWA Publishing, 2009. Chapter 2, Pek Ling Yong “fish graph location.ai” & “fish graph.ai” & “fish graph 2.ai” NREM Programme 2001-2006: Data Tool Box, Danish International Development Assistance (DANIDA), 2006 < www.cambodiaatlas.com>. C1-25 Flooded Forest Area 1976, C1-27 Flooded Forest Area 1997 RIGHT, C1-29 Flooded Grassland Area, C1-31 Flooded Shrub Area Osbourne, Milton. Lowy Institute Paper 27: The Mekong, International Policy, 2009. 02-52-LI-Dam Sponsors
River Under Threat. Lowy Institute for
Pang, Wei-Chong and Pavel Tkalich. “Modeling Tidal and Monsoon Driven Currents in the Singapore Strait.” Singapore Maritime and Port Journal, 151-162. 2003. 1 Jul. 2010 <http://www.porl.nus. edu.sg/Drplink/PDF/MPAJ-02.PDF>. 1 Geok East Going Current, 1 Geok West Going Current, 1 Geok Tide Height and Currents Speed Paul E.R. “Siem Reap: Urban Development in the Shadow of Angkor”, p8.2008. Annual Forum of Pacific Rim Council on Urban Development http://www.getty.edu/conservation/education/sea/final_report_2008_pacrim.pdf,1Jul’10 4 Provinces around Tonle Sap, Landmass comparison, Angkor vs Tonle Sap, Proximity of Angkor to Tonle Sap and Siem reap commune centres Phnom Penh. National Institute of Statistics, 2002. Chapter 2, Pek Ling Yong, “Annual rainfall. ai” “Provinces and municipalities of Cambodia” Canby Publications Co Ltd.2009. http://www.canbypublications.com/maps/simpleprov.htm, 1Jul’10. 1 Provinces and landform Publications Co., Ltd;2009; http://www.canbypublications.com/maps/provsr.htm; 1Jul’10 R. Fletcher’08.”The development of the water management system of Angkor: A provisional model”, p59.2008. Finnish Environment Institute and Helsinki University http://ejournal.anu.edu.au/ index.php/bippa/article/viewFile/642/630, 20Jun’10. 4 Provinces around Tonle Sap, Landmass comparison, Angkor vs Tonle Sap, Proximity of Angkor to Tonle Sap, Topography Angkor & water infrastructure breakdown Ross Savann. “Major Disaster information” 2006. National Committee for disaster Management Cambodia. http://www.em-dat.net/documents/bangkok06/cambodiadisinfomgmtdb.pdf, 29Jul ’10. 1 Disas-
263
ters and waterborne epidemics Shankari, Uma. “Water from Waste and Sea to make a Splash.” The Business Times 29 Jun. 2010: 1 1 Geok Water Catchments Siem reap coordinates. Google Earth 2009; 23Jul’10 Singapore. Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts. Singapore-Malaysia Water Talks: What are the Facts? Feb 2003. 15 Jul. 2010 <www.dfw-singapore.com/water_talks_final.pdf>. File name: spore-malaysia, File name: Water economy Singapore. National Environmental Agency. Guide to Singapore’s Weather: NEA Meteorogical Services. 26 Mar. 2007. 3 Jul. 2010 <app.nea.gov.sg/data/mss/pdf/26March07.pdf>. File name: Singapore rainfall Singapore. Agri‐Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore. Jul. 2010 <http://www.kbrisingapura. com/singapore_highlight/ava_farms_consumtion.pdf>. Chapter 2, Pek Ling Yong, “feed spore.ai” Singapore. Maritime and Port Authority. 20 Jun. 2010 <http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/images/pdf_ capture/aj0310308.jpg>. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, Singapore Anchorage and Port Limit Singapore. Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. Towards Environmental Sustainability State of the Environment 2005 Report. 2005. 21 Jul. 2010 <http://app.mewr.gov.sg/data/imgcont/680/SOE%20Report%202005(Chapter%202%20Water).pdf >. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, DTSS sewerage pipe Singapore. Public Utilities Board. Local Catchment Water. 25 Jun. 2010 <http://www.pub.gov.sg/ water/Pages/LocalCatchment.aspx>. 1 Geok Source of Water Catchment Supply, 1 Geok Water Bodies Singapore. Singapore Government “Key Annual Indicators.” 2009. 30 Jun. 2010 <http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/keyind.html>. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, Singapore Land Area 2009 Singapore. Singapore Government. “Household Expenditure Survey.” 30 Jun. 2010 <http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/themes/people/hes.pdf>. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, Singapore Household Expenditure for 2008 “Singapore’s Water Cycle Wizardry.” IEEE Spectrum Magazine. 2010. Jul. 2010 <http://spectrum. ieee.org/energy/environment/singapores-water-cycle-wizardry/4/singsb01>. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, NEWater Capacity Tan T.W. Hugh. The Natural Heritage of Singapore. Singapore: Prentice Hall, 2010. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, Singapore Land Expansion “Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia.” 1997-2010. Canby Publications Co. Ltd. 3 Jul. 2010 <http://www.canbypublications.com/maps/srtonlesapmap.htm>. The World Bank Group. The World Bank. 2010. Jul. 2010 <http://www.worldbank.org/>. population1, population2, Chapter 1, Pek Ling Yong , “GDP per capita.pdf” Tortajda, Cecilia. “Water Management in Singapore.” Water Resources Development Vol. 22 No. 2, 227–240. Jun. 2006. Jul. 2010 <http://www.adb.org/water/knowledge-center/awdo/br01.pdf>. File name: UFW United Nations Population Division. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations. 2010. Jul. 2010 <http://www.un.org/esa/population/>. Popdensity “Tuas Seawater Desalination Plant – Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) Singapore.” 28 Jul. 2010. 30 Jul. 2010 <http://www.water-technology.net/projects/tuas/>. File name (s) - 1, Winnie, Desalination Capacity Upson, Sandra. “Singapore’s Water Cycle Wizardry.” IEEE Spectrum. 1 Jun. 2010. 30 Jun 2010 <http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/environment/singapores-water-cycle-wizardry/0>. File name (s) 1, Winnie, Energy and Water Wade Shepard. ”Not-possible to travel the world” 2009. http://www.vagabondjourney.com/travelogue/not-possible-to-travel-the-world/. 1 Location Water Environment Partnership in Asia. “Facts on physical geog and climate” http://www.wepa-db. net/policies/state/cambodia/overview1_2.htm, 28 Jul’10. 1 Rainfall World Development Indicators. The World Bank. 2008 Chapter 1, Pek Ling Yong, “size.ai” & “GDP.ai Yeoh (Dr), Brenda S A. Heinemann Singapore Atlas. Singapore: Heinemann Asia, 1993. File name: Singapore rainfall
264
Special Thanks National University of Singapore Faculty of Architecture
HOK
We would like to express our thanks to the National University Of Singapore, Faculty of Architecture for supporting our site study of Cambodia without which this publication and relevant research work would not have been made possible.
We would like to express our thanks to HOK Architects for their generous sponsorship and support to this publication.
Their generous sponsorship provided a platform for us to engage in overseas urban fieldwork,an invaluable experience in terms of gaining crucial knowledge on hydrological urbanism in Cambodia and a better understanding of local culture.
They have provided the team with a platform to share our studies and research with a larger audience and we are grateful for this oppurtunity to share our information with others who will benefit from it. We applaud HOK for their support of student work and research, and hope that they will continue to give more architecture students such an opportunity.
265
266
267