Insect and Hydroponic Farming in Africa

Page 237

(Netherlands), Argus Control Systems (Canada), Heliospectra AB (Sweden), and Scotts Miracle Gro (United States). Leading hydroponic crop producers include AeroFarms (United States), Terra Tech Corp (United States), Triton Foodworks (India), and Emirates Hydroponic Farm (United Arab Emirates). The hydroponic industry is expected to be worth US$22.2 billion by 2028 (Intrado 2021). TYPES OF HYDROPONIC SYSTEMS There are a variety of hydroponic systems, from simple to sophisticated. There are numerous approaches to hydroponics—including aeroponics, fogponics, aquaponics, dryponics, and others. Some of these approaches are open and some are closed, but each follows the same principle: plants grow, without soil, in a circulating nutrient-rich water system (Wootton-Beard 2019). Among the different hydroponic approaches are various systems, including wick, deep water culture, ebb and flow, drip method, NFT, aquaponics, and aeroponics. These systems share many features but fundamentally differ in how they manage the nutrient solution. The most popular systems are deep water culture, drip method, and NFT (Resh 1995). The grower chooses the system depending on the type of plant and the facility’s limitations, whether a lack of growing space or materials (Jensen 1997). Figure 5.1 describes the different systems and provides examples of how each is set up. Hydroponic systems can generally be delineated into open and closed systems. Open systems, also known as “run-to-waste systems,” do not reuse water. The nutrient solution flows through the system only once and is discarded (Jensen 1997; Nederhoff and Stanghellini 2010). Open systems provide two primary advantages over closed systems: (1) they do not require nutrient solution maintenance, and (2) they reduce the risk of acquiring infectious plant pathogens (Jones 2016). Despite these advantages, open systems are known to be wasteful of water and nutrients (Nederhoff and Stanghellini 2010), which may not be appropriate for arid, water-scarce regions. By contrast, closed systems recirculate the nutrient solution for an unspecified length of time (Lykas et al. 2006). These systems add water and nutrients as necessary instead of replacing the entire solution after each use (Jensen 1997; Nederhoff and Stanghellini 2010). The nutrient solution is regularly monitored and adjusted to maintain proper nutrient ratios. As a result, closed hydroponic systems use 20 to 40 percent less water and nutrients than open hydroponic systems, but closed systems require more monitoring and maintenance. This need arises because ions accumulate as the nutrient solution recirculates (Lykas et al. 2006). And recirculation requires reservoirs and pumping systems that must be monitored and maintained. This infrastructure can be susceptible to failure if it is not managed well (Nederhoff and Stanghellini 2010). Wick techniques are open systems that comprise raised garden beds sitting above a water reservoir. This is the most common hydroponic technique and the easiest to set up and maintain (Wootton-Beard 2019). In areas with Understanding Hydroponics

197


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Phase 2: Scaling

2min
page 279

Phase 1: Establishing and Piloting

6min
pages 274-276

6. Ways Forward

1min
page 271

References

8min
pages 266-270

Operation in Turkey

1min
page 260

Operation in Turkey

1min
page 259

Comparison with Soil-Based Production

2min
page 264

Pillars

7min
pages 257-258

Limitations

2min
page 256

and Cowpeas

6min
pages 253-255

5.1 Examples of Human Food or Animal Feed from Hydroponic Crops

5min
pages 248-250

Advantages over Soil Agriculture

2min
page 252

Outputs

2min
page 247

Types of Hydroponic Systems

2min
page 237

References

11min
pages 227-232

About Hydroponics

6min
pages 234-236

Fertilizers, Zimbabwe

1min
page 204

Breeding, Zimbabwe

1min
page 203

4.22 Black Soldier Fly Larvae Frass Production, by Crop, Zimbabwe

1min
page 201

Zimbabwe

0
page 199

Zimbabwe

1min
page 195

Zimbabwe

4min
pages 197-198

Zimbabwe

1min
page 191

Zimbabwe

1min
page 189

4.7 BSF-Related Conversion Factors

4min
pages 186-187

4.4 Productivity of Different African Palm Weevil Farming Systems

2min
page 180

Three African Cities

5min
pages 181-183

Edible Insect Production Systems

7min
pages 171-174

Description of When Consumption Occurs

3min
pages 159-160

Insect Production Systems

10min
pages 163-167

Edible Insect Supply Chains in African FCV-Affected States

3min
pages 156-157

Insect Farming’s Economic Benefits

2min
page 133

3.9 Feed Conversion Rates of Various Insect and Livestock Species

4min
pages 128-129

Insect Farming’s Social Benefits

2min
page 123

Insect Farming’s Environmental Benefits

4min
pages 124-125

3.8 Fat and Protein in Various Edible Insect Species

6min
pages 120-122

Available in 2019

3min
pages 117-118

Insect Sector

5min
pages 114-116

3.2 Most Commonly Farmed Insect Species

3min
pages 102-104

Types of Insects That Can Be Farmed Roles in Insect Farming for Civil Society, Government, and the

2min
page 101

3.1 Diversity and Abundance of Edible Insects in Africa

3min
pages 96-97

Insect Farming’s Nutritional Benefits

2min
page 119

in Kenya’s Kakuma Refugee Camp, 2016

1min
page 100

Context of Insect Farming in Africa

2min
page 95

in 13 African FCV Countries, Various Years

1min
page 76

Conflict, and Violence

1min
page 48

FCV Countries, 2000–19

1min
page 74

Road Map

2min
page 51

Than Five Years

2min
pages 67-68

Food Supply

2min
page 65

References

4min
pages 54-56

Climate Change in FCV Countries

2min
page 82
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.