Crop Productivity, Yield and Technology Adoption Survey of ATASP-1 Small Holder Farmers in Nigeria

Page 63

Figure 9 : Technologies disseminated on rice practiced

4.3 4.3.1

Mode of practicing technologies extended on cassava production Functionality of adopted technology is primarily assessed by the rate of utilization. It is therefore logical that after selecting applicable technologies that could enhance farming productivity and presenting each of these at appropriate time and venues to farmers; it becomes very necessary to ascertain the level or rate of utilization of each of the packages. Therefore, the analysis of the frequency of practicing good agronomic practices delivered to cassava farmers are as presented in table 26 below. From the table, it was found that improved cassava varieties were highly in use by these farmers across the 3 SCPZs as the average weighted score was 4.3 which was by far greater than 3.0 indicating the limit point where the effective usage of this technology begins. For this improved crop varieties, about 64% of the farmers affirmed that they regularly use it, 21% claimed they often use it while about 14% claimed they sometime use it. If we sum these together, we have 100% that were using this particular technology (improve variety) showing that the technology is very popular among the farmers. On site selection, it also has a weighted average score of 3.7 showing that farmers have keyed into this technology. With about 36% of them claiming that, they regularly use this technology, while about 29% claimed they often use it and about 27 claimed they sometime used the technology and only 7% claimed have never. Summing all of these will give us a total of 100%. This is an indication that, this particular technology has been

Yield and Technology Adoption Survey

47


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Cassava Farmers

1min
page 96

Table 41: Adoption of Good Agronomic Practiced Technology on Cassava ATASP-1

3min
pages 91-92

Annexure 5: Fabricators FGD questionnaire

2min
pages 119-121

Table 42: Adoption of Good Agronomic Practiced Technology on Sorghum ATASP-1

3min
pages 93-94

Figure 21: Technologies practiced on sorghum

0
page 88

Table 35: Mean Processed Output Quantity Before and After ATASP-1 by Zone

2min
page 81

Figure 16: Mean crop production for non-adopters and adopters

1min
page 79

Table 28: Frequency of Practicing Rice Technologies

3min
pages 72-73

Table 27: Frequency of Practicing Sorghum Technologies

0
page 68

Table 30: Rate of Adoption of Cassava Technologies

2min
page 75

Table 33: Effects of Adoption of GAP on Corp Production

1min
page 78

Figure 11: frequency of practicing technologies on sorghum

3min
pages 69-70

Figure 9: Technologies disseminated on rice practiced

3min
pages 63-64

Table 9: Lead Farmers Average Years of Cropping Experience by Zone

1min
page 48

Figure 7: Technologies disseminated on cassava practiced

1min
page 59

Rationale

2min
page 19

2.6.2 AfricaRice

2min
page 30

1.9 Objectives of the Study

1min
page 23

2.6.3 ICRISAT

1min
page 31

3.6 Model Specification

4min
pages 35-37

2.1.2 Technologies disseminated to rice farmers are

1min
page 26
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.