Crop Productivity, Yield and Technology Adoption Survey of ATASP-1 Small Holder Farmers in Nigeria

Page 96

Table 44: Constraints Militating Against the Adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among Cassava Farmers Constraints Very Severe Mild Not Not a Weighted severe severe severe problem score Insufficient safety 2(14.3) -(-) 2(14.3) 5(35.7) 5(35.7) 2.7 awareness Poor understanding of -(-) (-) 1(7.1) 6(42.9) 7(50.0) 2.2 technology Poor record keeping 2(14,3) 1(7.1) 3(21.4) 2(14.3) 6(42.9) 2.4 Human Factor 1(7.1) 3(21.4) 4(28.6) 3(21,4) 3(21.4) 2.8 Physical/climatic factors -(-) 3(21.4) 4(28.6) 2(14.3) 5(35.7) 2.4 Sociocultural -(-) 3(21.4) 1(7,1) 2(14.3) 8(57.1) 1.9 Labour shortage 1(7.1) 2(14.3) 8(57.1) -(-) 3(21.4) 3.0 Stakeholders networking 1(7.1) 3(21.4) 4(28.6) 1(7.1) 16(35.7) 2.7 Conflict -(-) -(-) -(-) 5(35.7) 9(64.3) 1.6 Low price 2(14.3) 3(21.4) 5(35.7) -(-) 4(28.6) 3.0 High cost of transport 1(7.1) 7(50.0) 2(14.3) -(-) 4(28.6) 3.4 Pests and diseases 2(14.3) -(-) 5(35.7) 6(42.9) 1(7.1) 2.8 Inadequate capital 8(57.1) 5(35.7) -(-) -(-) 1(7.1) 3.6 Inadequate land 3(21.4) 3(21.4) 1(7.1) 2(14.3) 5(35.7) 2.6 Poor road network 14(28.6) -(-) 3(21.4) 4(28.6) 3(21.4) 2.8. Figures in parentheses are percentages Note: weighted score less than 3.0 indicates not severe

4.14.5 Constraints militating against the adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among sorghum farmers There are 16 envisaged constraints that could militate against adoption of good agronomic practices by sorghum farmers in various zones under the Program. These constraints are presented in the Table 45 below. From the table, all but one has weighted scores that were less than 3; meaning that only one of them posed severity that could hamper adoption of agronomic practices disseminated to sorghum farmers. However, those with 2.7 weighted scores and above should be given due attention because they are critical to productivity and as well to farmers' income earning prospect. Low capital for investment having above 3.0 weighted score should be handle with carefulness, since the Program does not disburse fund nor included such in the package for the selected farmers. It will be reasonable to the Program if linking up the farmers with credit institutions is integrated into the intervention in all the Zonal levels.

Yield and Technology Adoption Survey

80


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Cassava Farmers

1min
page 96

Table 41: Adoption of Good Agronomic Practiced Technology on Cassava ATASP-1

3min
pages 91-92

Annexure 5: Fabricators FGD questionnaire

2min
pages 119-121

Table 42: Adoption of Good Agronomic Practiced Technology on Sorghum ATASP-1

3min
pages 93-94

Figure 21: Technologies practiced on sorghum

0
page 88

Table 35: Mean Processed Output Quantity Before and After ATASP-1 by Zone

2min
page 81

Figure 16: Mean crop production for non-adopters and adopters

1min
page 79

Table 28: Frequency of Practicing Rice Technologies

3min
pages 72-73

Table 27: Frequency of Practicing Sorghum Technologies

0
page 68

Table 30: Rate of Adoption of Cassava Technologies

2min
page 75

Table 33: Effects of Adoption of GAP on Corp Production

1min
page 78

Figure 11: frequency of practicing technologies on sorghum

3min
pages 69-70

Figure 9: Technologies disseminated on rice practiced

3min
pages 63-64

Table 9: Lead Farmers Average Years of Cropping Experience by Zone

1min
page 48

Figure 7: Technologies disseminated on cassava practiced

1min
page 59

Rationale

2min
page 19

2.6.2 AfricaRice

2min
page 30

1.9 Objectives of the Study

1min
page 23

2.6.3 ICRISAT

1min
page 31

3.6 Model Specification

4min
pages 35-37

2.1.2 Technologies disseminated to rice farmers are

1min
page 26
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.