ON BACALAR'S DEFENSE. COLLOQUIAL VERSION

Page 70

They tried to insert their proposal into the Regulation so that what would not otherwise be validated would not be validated, given its unilateral and biased origin, would be validated. Kind of like sneaking it under the door, but the community kicked them back. By 2019 local groups and grassroots organizations were defending the territory from several fronts: against PROTUR (promoted by Geoalternativa, SEMA and State Tourism), against a new proposal with an intersecretarial declaration scheme for Critical Habitat in the Bacalar Lagoon (with a new NGO in the area: SELBA, AC and former CONANP members), Ramsar continued to be promoted (by the people of IEUNAM and ECOSUR), it continued to try to implement a protected natural area without having arguments (SEMA and local and regional ENGOs), manipulating public opinion and creating myths along the way to validate its invalidable proposals, insisting that such requests came from the community but it was the communities that were fighting against these proposals. And then came the triad proposal to modify Rule 23 of the APIQROO Regulations.

ECOSUR and IEUNAM, in APIQROO If there was the doubt of how the triad acts to validate each other, there is the document that was sent to the APIQROO Operations Committee where precisely the importance of leaving the conservation areas derived from the investigations of Luisa Falcón and AlfredoYañez is emphasized, without specifying what these investigations have been, simply and simply placing a map made freehand with Google Earth and providing arguments that have been repeating a and again as part of your strategies to achieve your goals. They addressed a letter to the director of APIQROO in order to try to influence the design of the instrument. It mentioned Luisa Falcón (IEUNAM) and Alfredo Yañez of ECOSUR, whose opinions were considered to have sufficient authority to influence and change the guidelines of the APIQROO instrument without more evidence than their university degree, through categorical statements that were opinions taken by facts.

52


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Demystifying Stromatolites

2hr
pages 221-304

The myth of tourism and tourism in PNA, pro-poor

9min
pages 215-220

The colonialist myth of the petty or ignorant local inhabitant

16min
pages 190-198

The myth of Carrying Capacity for Tourism

24min
pages 199-211

The Acceptable Change Limit

5min
pages 212-214

Bacalar

5min
pages 186-189

The myth of the lack of regulation of the Bacalar Lagoon and its basin Hundreds of instruments to regulate and over-regulate almost everything in

3min
pages 184-185

IBANQROO and PROTUR

31min
pages 162-183

"Innovative" strategies that put the lagoon and user safety at risk

16min
pages 153-161

Unexplained zoning criteria

6min
pages 148-150

50% of the Lagoon in Conservation or only for Research

1min
page 152

Subzone 5.1 Microbialites of Buenavista

1min
page 151

The Unexplained Calculation of Load Capacity and Acceptable Change Limit

10min
pages 142-147

SWOT without feet or head

1min
page 141

Participatory construction simulation

8min
pages 137-140

The Master Plan for Sustainable Tourism of Quintana Roo 2030

10min
pages 131-136

The PNA Management Program does not solve the problems

4min
pages 127-130

Who benefits from PNAs?

7min
pages 123-126

Rule 23. The CONCCLAB in APIQROO

7min
pages 70-73

The failed PNA, in Quintana Roo

1hr
pages 81-117

The Secretary of the Navy and APIQROO

10min
pages 74-80

2011 – 2014 RAMSAR. 97,591 hectares for the triad

25min
pages 53-67

Bacalar’s PNA propposal

9min
pages 118-122

ECOSUR and IEUNAM, in APIQROO

1min
page 68
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.