Leisure Water Uses As Urban Commons : A Play Element in Metropolitan Brussels

Page 142

REDEFINING A COMMON SQUARE About the architectural intervention on the square, the intention is to not touch most of its existing qualities. [Hardscape] The mineral hardscape - mainly due to its structural design - is of real interest. Indeed, the materiality, the flatness and proportions of the existing Plaza allows skateboarding and other similar activities. Those activities shouldn’t be chased with the new project but other new activities could be induced by the new elements. Adding trees or vegetation could have been a brilliant idea but is also inconsistent on such a thin slabs without major structural transformations. This is - why because of feasibility problems- the introduction of percolating vegetation will not be envisioned. [Commoning Space] A new building will be implemented creating an activating and servicing element on the square. A social and commonly managed public space will be accessible to the Plaza’s visitors. Public toilets, showers and lockers will also be reachable for who would like to use them. [ Fountain ] A water element is added on the square which will address the Play, Leisure and Refreshment concerns of the design. This fountain is not intended as a decorative component

but an interactive element. It’s abstract qualities defined by water will allow transformative protocols of Play while refreshing the square. It will be fed by the new water circular facility proposed in the project. The shape of the fountains tend to impact the underneath structure the least as possible. A slight bend in the slab will be executed. This will allow water to stay in the fountains but also still allow pre-existent functions if the fountain should be stopped. This is also made possible through fountain elements providing water and collecting it being as minimal as possible (see figures below). [Access to Pacheco Boulevard] An access stairwell is placed in the middle of the square, creating an new East-West connecting axis. The minimal design was intended to least perturbated the underneath structure. The materiality (coloured brutalistic concrete elements) stages and positions the new access while preserving - almost like an heritage intervention - the existing. [Temporality] The uses of the square will evolve with time and seasons. The project while trying to leave as much adaptation possibilities, tries to limits it’s impact on the existent and already functioning Plaza while keeping it’s character and connection to the view.

Fig. 79 & 80 - Fountain elements - (Source: Multiple captured by M. Lunetta)

142

­| ARCHITECTURE


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

VII - Conclusion

3min
pages 174-181

Bibliography

2min
pages 184-188

Connection Staircase

2min
pages 154-161

Free Play Space

2min
pages 166-173

A Space for Commoning

1min
pages 148-153

Redefining a Common Square

2min
pages 142-147

VI - Architectural Proposal

2min
pages 124-127

Future of the Site

3min
pages 98-101

Commons as a Local Strategy

2min
pages 130-133

Connecting

1min
pages 128-129

The Site

1min
pages 90-91

Historical Context

7min
pages 92-97

Urban Strategy

1min
pages 84-89

Understanding the existing

13min
pages 70-83

Conclusion

1min
pages 66-69

Jardin Portuaire

1min
pages 62-65

Tainan Spring

1min
pages 54-57

Temporary Pools

1min
pages 58-61

Water Interaction

3min
pages 46-51

Bellamy Play-Pond

1min
pages 52-53

Analysis

1min
pages 42-45

Waterplay

1min
pages 40-41

Aldo Van Eyck’s playgrounds

2min
pages 32-39

The concept of Play

6min
pages 18-21

Leisure in the city

2min
pages 16-17

Right to the city

2min
page 14

Aims, Research Questions, Methods

1min
pages 11-13

Water uses in Brussels

11min
pages 22-31

Urban Commons

1min
page 15

Introduction

1min
page 9

Abstract

2min
page 10
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.