Literature review and theoretical model
2.4. ESA Factors Research on ESA factors has resorted to different theoretical concepts as lenses to understand ESA. It can be said that such theories explain how firms adopt environmental strategies as a way to deal with uncertainty, achieve a competitive advantage or address societal needs. Specifically, the Institutional Theory has been used to explain how external and stakeholder pressures can lead firms to adopt similar environmental strategies as a way to seek legitimacy (M. Delmas & Toffel, 2004; Sarkis, 2003). Resource Based View (RBV) has been used to explain how firms adopt different environmental strategies by using their business models and capabilities in order to achieve environmental and economic benefits. Finally, CSR in alignment with the concept of Cognitive Frames has been used to illustrate the role of managers in ESA. Relying on these theoretical perspectives, the ESA influencing factors analyzed in the present research are, respectively, business context, business model and manager’s perspective (See Table 3. Co-occurrence configuration of ESA Factors). Table 3. Co-occurrence configuration of ESA Factors Strategies Green processes
Green products development
Green systems
Factors
Compliance
Business context
Regulation Social license
Green industry Parent company
Green markets
Community Green markets
Business model
Stable
Stable
Dynamic
Transforma- Boons, tive (2009)
Profits
Profits
Citizenship
Manager´s Compliance perspective
References Hoffman, (2001) & Genc, (2013) Earnhart, (2017)
Carroll, (1999)
• Business context Business context plays an important role in the adoption of strategies by firms, because of the external constraints and norms that institutions impose on corporations and that are translated into the technical attributes that drive the way companies operate” (Bhimani et al., 2016)). Multiple pressures such as performance rewards, pressure for conformity and social
| 49