The adoption of environmental strategies in large Colombian businesses

Literature review and theoretical model

A summary of the characteristics of institutional pressures (e.g. coercive, mimetic and normative sources) in the adoption of environmental strategies, is presented in Table 4: Business context and Environmental Strategies. Table 4. Business context and Environmental Strategies Isomorphic pressures Coercive sources

Drivers

* There is pressure to conform to rules.

Environmental regulation in conjunction with social license, cultural expectations and mass media.

Material substitution restricted by law

Successful (international) competitors, supply networks and parent companies.

* Competitors´ and parent companies´ best practices

* The firm is exposed to social penalties. * Regulation is the main driver.

Mimetic sources

Environmental Strategies

Characteristics

* There is pressure to imitate other practices for achieving success. * The firm is exposed to lagging behind competitors.

End of pipe solutions

References D’Andrade, (1984). Hoffman, (1997) Earnhardt, (2017)

Ecosystem restoration in exchange for firm´s impacts Zhu & Geng, (2013). DiMaggio, (1983). Vejvar, (2017)

* Uncertainty and novelty are the main drivers. Normative sources

* There is pressure for the standardization of activities. * The firm expects a performance reward. * Values and norms from the business context constitute the main drivers.

The adoption of environmental strategies in large Colombian businesses

Articles inside

Table 40. Factors for the adoption of environmental strategies

Table 39. ESA and ESA Factors across cases

Table 38. Main ESA factors observed in the case studies

Figure 15. ESA and the ESA factors at the Dairy Company

Table 37. Main environmental strategies observed in the case studies

Table 35. Business model – Dairy Company

Figure 14. ESA and the ESA factors at the Cosmetic Company

Table 36. Manager´s Perspective – Dairy Company

Table 33. ESA –Dairy Company

Table 34. Business Context – Dairy Company

Table 32. Manager´s perspective – Cosmetic Company

Table 30. Business Context – Cosmetic Company

Table 31. Business model – Cosmetic Company

Table 29. ESA – Cosmetic Company

Table 23. Business Model – Oil & Gas Company

Table 25. ESA – Agri-business

Table 27. Business Model – Agri-business

Table 26. Business Context – Agri-business

Table 22. Business Context – Oil & Gas Company

Figure 11. ESA and the ESA factors at the Utility Company

Table 21. ESA – Oil & Gas Company

Table 20. Manager´s Perspective – Utility Company

Table 19. Business Model – Utility Company

Table 18. Business Context – Utility Company

Figure 10. ESA and ESA factors at the Chemical Company

Table 17. ESA – Utility Company

Table 16. Manager´s Perspective – Chemical Company

Table 14. Business Context - Chemical Company

Table 15. Business Model - Chemical Company

Table 13. ESA - Chemical Company

Figure 9. ESA and ESA factors at the Bank

Table 12. Manager´s perspective -Bank

Table 10. Business Context - Bank

Table 8. Selected cases

Table 11. Business Model - Bank

Table 9. ESA - Bank

Table 7. ESA and influencing factors

Figure 8. Data classification

Figure 6. Theoretical Model of ESA and ESA Factors

Table 5 Business models and environmental strategies

Table 4. Business context and Environmental Strategies

Figure 5. Collaborative networks of ESA research

Table 3 Co-occurrence configuration of ESA Factors

Table 2. Typology of environmental strategies used in this research

Figure 3. Co-word clusters in the literature review

Table 6. Manager´s perspective and Environmental Strategies

Figure 2. Distribution of articles in Journals