2019 Swanson School Summary of Faculty Research

Page 22

BIOENGINEERING

Tamer S. Ibrahim, PhD

1038 BioScience Tower 3 | 3501 Fifth Avenue | Pittsburgh, PA 15260

Professor and Director, RF Research Facility Department of Radiology School of Medicine

P: 412-383-6946  C: 412-865-7719 tibrahim@pitt.edu

7 Tesla Neuroimaging Studies with the Tic-Tac-Toe Radiofrequency Coil System Introduction

Results

Recently FDA-approved 7 Tesla (T) MRI can provide improved signal-to-noise ratio, resolution, and image contrast when compared with standard clinical MRI scanners (usually 1.5T or 3T). However, proton imaging at higher frequencies (~300MHz) and shorter wavelength (~13cm in brain tissues) can lead to inhomogeneities in the images and potentially cause high localized radiofrequency (RF) power deposition in the tissue. The Tic-Tac-Toe (TTT) RF coil system provides improved homogeneity and reduced power deposition. It is achieved thanks to an innovative coil design and a methodology of operation. Several clinical MRI sequences have been performed and compared with commercial RF coils, demonstrating the superior performance of the Tic-Tac-Toe RF coil system. Numerous clinical studies including NIH funded studies (~2,000 subjects) are currently being conducted using this coil at the University of Pittsburgh.

Image comparison with the 32-channel NOVA commercial RF coil TTT coil

a)

c)

TTT coil

d)

a)

b)

c)

b)

c)

d)

380μm

250μm

200μm

Functional MRI Finger tapping task: activation of motor and visual cortex

Lacunar infarct (arrow): depression study

b )

max

b)

Simulated Tic-Tac-Toe Measured Tic-Tac-Toe

Fig. 6: In a), post-processed finger tapping task acquired at 1.5mm isotropic resolution, TR = 2.5 seconds, 3 min total acquisition time, 1 subject. In b), post-processed resting state functional MRI, acquired at 2mm isotropic resolution, TR = 1s, 8 min total acquisition time, 1 subject.

0

White matter hyperintensities (arrows): Healthy Brain aging study (left) and Small Vessels disease in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease study (right)

Resting state activation in the default network Resting state MRI:MRI: activation in the default mode network

Fig. 7: In a), post-processed finger tapping task acquired at 1.5mm iso, TR = 2.5 seconds, 3 min total acquisition time. In b), post-processed resting stated functional MRI, acquired at 2mm isotropic, TR = 1s, 6 min total acquisition time.

Measured Nova coil

Fig. 2: The B1 (magnetic field responsible for spin excitation) field homogeneity is highly degraded at 7T MRI due to a higher operational frequency (~297MHz). The TTT presents a more homogeneous field distribution when compared with the NOVA coil (a commercial coil) [1].

Automatic hippocampus segmentation: Midlife Neurocognitive Disparities study

Fig. 5: Maximum intensity projection of a TOF acquisition showing brain vasculature in sagittal orientation and small vessels detectability with the increase in image resolution. In a), 2-slab 0.25mm isotropic image showing whole brain vasculature; In b), 0.38mm isotropic acquisition; In c), 0.25mm isotropic acquisition. In d), 0.20mm isotropic resolution acquisition showing an extra amount of vessels that are only detectable at higher resolution (arrows).

Fig. 1: in a), the implemented 16-channel TTT transmit RF coil; in b), the computational modeling of the RF coil; in c), the implemented RF coil with an 32-channel receive insert

Regions with low B1+ intesity can produce voids or low-constrast in the images

Stroke (circle): sickle cell disease study

High resolution angiography without contrast agents a)

a)

+

White matter legions (circle): Multiple Sclerosis study

Fig. 4: SWI images acquired at 0.2x0.2x1.5mm resolution. In a) an axial slice of the whole brain image acquisition. In b) and c), zoomed versions of a), detailing the micro-structures.

c)

B1+ maps in the brain: TTT vs NOVA RF coils

Table 1: 7T MRI studies conducted at the RF Research Facility at University of Pittsburgh

NOVA coil

High-resolution susceptibility weighted images showing cortical microvessels

The Tic-Tac-Toe (TTT) radiofrequency head coil for 7T MRI b)

NOVA coil

Fig. 3: In a), Turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence using the TTT coil with resolution of 0.4x0.4x2mm. In b), the same TSE sequence acquired with the commercial NOVA coil. In c), FLAIR sequence acquired with TTT coil with resolution of 0.7x0.7x2mm. In d), the same FLAIR sequence acquired with NOVA coil. The arrows point to regions of dark spots in the NOVA coil images and compare with similar regions on the TTT coil images [1].

Material and Methods a)

b)

Diffusion MRI and fiber tracking a)

Post-mortem a)

Fig. 9: Sample of some studies listed in Table 1 using the developed 16-channel TTT RF array (Fig. 1a). There are 4 completed studies and 13 ongoing patient studies with approximated 2,000 patients scheduled.

Future Directions

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

a)

64-channel Tic-Tac-Toe RF transmit coil for 7T MRI c) 8 kW power amplifier: b)

max

b) 16 kW power amplifier: Fig. 7: In a), an structural MPRAGE image acquired at 0.75mm isotropic (skull removed using FSL package). In b), fiber tracking based on DTI acquisition, 64 directions, 1.5mm isotropic resolution. The colors are defined for different orientations of the fibers.

22

Fig. 8: In a), susceptibility weighted images acquired at 0.35mm isotropic, 32 min acquisition time, in a post-mortem brain fixated with formalin. In b), a photograph of similar slice in the same brain.

Fig. 10: In a), the 64-channel transmit coil computational modeling [2]. To improve the field of view of the projector/monitor in fMRI studies, the frontal panels can be removed, resulting in a 56-channel coil. In b), one assembled side of the coil. In c), simulated B1+ field distribution: for an 8kW power amplifier capabilities (default in older 7T MRI scanners) a homogeneity (measured by the coefficient of variation CV) of 15.2% is achieved in the brain. For an 16 kW power amplifier (available for the recently FDA approved Siemens 7T MAGNETOM Terra), an CV of 10.6% can be achieved in the brain.

0

DEPARTMENT OF BIOENGINEERING


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Wei Xiong, PhD, D.Eng

37min
pages 127-146

Jörg M.K. Wiezorek, PhD

2min
page 126

Guofeng Wang, PhD

2min
page 125

Jeffrey Vipperman, PhD

2min
page 124

Albert C. To, PhD

1min
page 123

Inanc Senocak, PhD

1min
page 121

Patrick Smolinski, PhD

1min
page 122

Jung-Kun Lee, PhD

3min
page 117

Ian Nettleship, PhD

2min
page 119

David Schmidt, PhD

2min
page 120

Scott X. Mao, PhD

2min
page 118

Tevis D. B. Jacobs, PhD

1min
page 116

Katherine Hornbostel, PhD

1min
page 115

Daniel G. Cole, PhD, PE

2min
page 114

William W. Clark, PhD

2min
page 113

Heng Ban, PhD, PE

2min
page 110

Minking K. Chyu, PhD

2min
page 112

Markus Chmielus, PhD

1min
page 111

M. Ravi Shankar, PhD

2min
pages 106-108

Jayant Rajgopal, PhD

2min
page 105

Paul W. Leu, PhD

1min
page 102

Lisa M. Maillart, PhD

2min
page 103

Amin Rahimian, PhD

1min
page 104

Youngjae Chun, PhD

3min
page 98

Renee M. Clark, PhD

2min
page 99

Joel M. Haight, PhD, P.E., CIH, CSP

2min
page 100

Daniel R. Jiang, PhD

1min
page 101

Karen M. Bursic, PhD

1min
page 97

Mary Besterfield-Sacre, PhD

2min
page 96

Mostafa Bedewy, PhD

1min
page 95

Minhee Yun, PhD

2min
pages 92-94

Gregory F. Reed, PhD

3min
page 88

Feng Xiong, PhD

2min
page 90

Jun Yang, PhD

3min
page 91

Guangyong Li, PhD

2min
page 86

Inhee Lee, PhD

2min
page 85

Hong Koo Kim, PhD

2min
page 83

Alexis Kwasinski, PhD

2min
page 84

Alex K. Jones, PhD

3min
page 82

Alan D. George, PhD, FIEEE

2min
page 79

Masoud Barati, PhD

2min
page 78

Brandon M. Grainger, PhD

2min
page 80

Mai Abdelhakim, PhD

1min
page 77

Radisav Vidic, PhD

2min
pages 75-76

Piervincenzo Rizzo, PhD

2min
page 73

Aleksandar Stevanovic, PhD, P.E., FASCE

2min
page 74

Carla Ng, PhD

2min
page 72

Lei Fang, PhD

3min
page 65

Alessandro Fascetti, PhD

2min
page 66

Sarah Haig, PhD

2min
page 68

Xu Liang, PhD

2min
page 70

Jeen-Shang Lin, PhD, P.E

2min
page 71

Andrew P. Bunger, PhD

2min
page 64

Melissa Bilec, PhD

2min
page 63

Judith C. Yang, PhD

2min
pages 60-62

Götz Veser, PhD

2min
page 58

Jason E. Shoemaker, PhD

1min
page 56

Tagbo Niepa, PhD

2min
page 54

Christopher E. Wilmer, PhD

1min
page 59

Sachin S. Velankar, PhD

2min
page 57

Giannis Mpourmpakis, PhD

2min
page 53

Badie Morsi, PhD

3min
page 52

James R. McKone, PhD

1min
page 51

Steve R. Little, PhD

2min
page 50

J. Karl Johnson, PhD

2min
page 47

John A. Keith, PhD

2min
page 48

Susan Fullerton, PhD

2min
page 46

Lei Li, PhD

1min
page 49

Robert M. Enick, PhD

2min
page 45

Eric J. Beckman, PhD

2min
page 44

David A. Vorp, PhD

2min
page 37

Jonathan Vande Geest, PhD

1min
page 36

Justin S. Weinbaum, PhD

1min
page 38

Ipsita Banerjee, PhD

2min
page 43

George Stetten, MD, PhD

2min
page 34

Savio L-Y. Woo, PhD, D.Sc., D.Eng

2min
page 39

Gelsy Torres-Oviedo, PhD

3min
page 35

Ioannis Zervantonakis, PhD

2min
pages 40-42

Mark Redfern, PhD

2min
page 29

Spandan Maiti, PhD

2min
page 28

Partha Roy, PhD

2min
page 30

Sanjeev G. Shroff, PhD

2min
page 33

Warren C. Ruder, PhD

1min
page 31

Joseph Thomas Samosky, PhD

2min
page 32

Patrick J. Loughlin, PhD

2min
page 27

Prashant N. Kumta, PhD

2min
page 26

Mangesh Kulkarni, PhD

1min
page 25

Takashi “TK” Kozai, PhD

2min
page 24

Alan D. Hirschman, PhD

1min
page 21

Tamer S. Ibrahim, PhD

5min
page 22

Mark Gartner, PhD

1min
page 20

Bistra Iordanova, PhD

1min
page 23

Richard E. Debski, PhD

1min
page 17

Neeraj J. Gandhi, PhD

2min
page 19

William Federspiel, PhD

2min
page 18

Lance A. Davidson, PhD

2min
page 16

Aaron Batista, PhD

4min
page 9

Rakié Cham, PhD

2min
page 13

Bryan N. Brown, PhD

1min
page 12

Tracy Cui, PhD

2min
page 14

Kurt E. Beschorner, PhD

2min
page 10

Moni Kanchan Datta, PhD

2min
page 15

Harvey Borovetz, PhD

1min
page 11

Steven Abramowitch, PhD

2min
page 8
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.