Europan 15 Results Catalogue - Productive Cities /2

Page 10

How are Europan projects assessed? Didier Rebois (FR) — General Secretary of Europan

8

Before discovering the winning projects in this 15th

However, it is also a competition “followed by

session of Europan, it is perhaps worth reminding

implementations”, in which the aim is not only to reward

readers how the proposals submitted for the

innovative ideas, but also to convert those ideas into

competition are assessed.

more developed design processes and ultimately into

In fact, right from the creation of Europan 30 years

real operations.

ago, great importance has been attributed to this

This paradox partly explains the time and effort

phase of assessment, and to the award —through

invested in choosing the teams that will be awarded

the different national juries— of some 100 prizes per

the “Europan label” for their ideas, and in some cases

session (winners and runners-up combined), plus

go on to receive commissions for a second, so-called

special mention projects without prizes, out of the

“operational” phase. The juries have the difficult task

approximately 900 projects submitted. The filtering

of analysing the three panels the teams are required

process in this assessment phase is important and the

to submit, picking out projects that offer an innovative

choice of the winning teams is a strategic issue not only

perspective, an original vision, of the question raised

for the teams themselves, but also for the partners who

by the site, within the framework of a global theme

participate in the competition.

(the session topic), and awarding the Europan “label”.

Indeed, in its founding principle, Europan is called

At the same time, however, the selected projects

a “competition of ideas”, and the primary objective

need to offer a strategy that sets out key orientations

is to reward innovative projects devised by young

for implementing their ideas over time, within a given

European professionals of architectural, urban and

context. The best projects in a session are those that

landscape design.

meet both these requirements.

JURY SESSION IN BELGIUM

JURY SESSION IN FRANCE

JURY SESSION IN NETHERLANDS

JURY SESSION IN NORWAY

JURY SESSION IN SPAIN

JURY SESSION IN SWEDEN


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Rotterdam Groot IJsselmonde (NL

5min
pages 204-207

Pays de Dreux (FR

5min
pages 200-202

Special Mention – A(gri)puncture

0
page 203

Oliva (ES

7min
pages 194-199

Innsbruck (AT

4min
pages 190-193

Selb (DE

4min
pages 180-185

Rotterdam Brainpark I (NL

4min
pages 176-177

Types and Fields Julio de la Fuente (ES), Architect and urbanist

9min
pages 186-189

Romainville (FR

1min
page 172

Special Mention – Building upon Brainpark Special Mention – Elegy for the Office Park

1min
pages 178-179

Halmstad (SE

5min
pages 168-171

Floirac (FR

5min
pages 164-167

Casar de Cáceres (ES

5min
pages 160-162

Connectors and Enablers Blaž Babnik Romaniuk (SI), Architect

10min
pages 150-155

Auby (FR

5min
pages 156-159

Villach (AT

6min
pages 144-149

Special Mention – The Shape of Water

0
page 143

Winner – N.E.W (New Era Wharf

3min
pages 133-135

Sant Climent de Llobregat (ES

5min
pages 140-142

Rødberg (NO

1min
page 132

Winner – Common Node

12min
pages 123-131

Lasarte-Oria (ES

2min
page 122

La Louvière (BE

3min
pages 120-121

Third Space as Transitional Agent Socrates Stratis (CY), PhD in Architecture, urbanist and associate professor

13min
pages 110-115

Warszawa (PL

6min
pages 104-109

Hyvinkää (FI

6min
pages 116-119

et le bégonia Special Mention – Be Kind, Rewild

0
page 103

Rochefort Océan (FR

2min
page 100

Special Mention – Reveal the City: the Telhu’Halle

0
page 99

Runner-Up – La ville école

1min
page 98

Winner – Boîtes à secrets

1min
page 97

Port-Jérôme-sur-Seine (FR

1min
page 96

Special Mention – Up-CyclinGravina

1min
page 95

The Fantastic Forest Phenomenon Runner-Up – Open City

1min
pages 90-91

Winner

1min
page 89

Laterza (IT

2min
page 92

Runner-Up – LA3: a Productive Square

1min
page 94

Karlovac (HR

2min
page 88

Runner-Up – Of Cycles and Streams

1min
page 86

Graz (AT

2min
page 84

Runner-Up – Painting Greyfields

1min
page 82

Special Mention – Carsid sur la Sàmbre Special Mention – Matière savante

1min
pages 78-79

Enköping (SE

1min
page 80

Runner-Up – Forging the Fallow

1min
page 77

Charleroi (BE

1min
page 76

Definitions of Circularity Carlos Arroyo (ES), architect, urbanist, linguist, teacher

11min
pages 70-75

Runner-Up – Weiz Archipelago

1min
pages 66-69

Weiz (AT

2min
page 64

Winner – Learning from the Future

1min
page 65

Winner – Makers’ Maze

1min
page 57

Täby (SE

1min
page 60

Rotterdam Vierhavensblok (NL

2min
page 56

Special Mention – Den Gröna Kilen

0
page 63

Special Mention – A Moment Apart

1min
page 55

Runner-Up – MOVEnIN

1min
page 54

Winner – Soft Buffers

1min
page 53

Nin (HR

1min
page 52

Marseille (FR

2min
page 48

Runner-Up – 43°20’3’’N 5°21’39’’E

1min
page 49

Winner – Radical Reimagining

1min
pages 46-47

Guovdageaidnu (NO

1min
page 44

Runner-Up – Stamping Ground

1min
page 42

Special Mention – Verdoyer, cultiver, hybrider

0
page 43

Champigny-sur-marne (FR

2min
page 40

Winner – Lost Highway

1min
page 41

Learning to Multiply Miriam García García (ES), PhD in Architecture, landscape architect & urban designer

15min
pages 30-35

Borås (SE

2min
page 36

Winner – Made in Borås

1min
page 37

E15 Juries Presentation

8min
pages 14-21

Special Mention – Re:Mediate

0
page 39

Preface Anna Catasta, President of Europan

8min
pages 3-5

Towards Regenerative Eco-Productive Milieus Didier Rebois (FR), architect, teacher and Secretary General of Europan + Chris Younès (FR), anthro-philosopher, researcher and professor

12min
pages 22-29

How are Europan projects assessed?

13min
pages 10-13
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.