Europan 15 Results Catalogue - Productive Cities /2

Page 204

ROTTERDAM GROOT IJSSELMONDE (NL) PROJECT SCALE — L/S – urban + architecture /

SITE PROPOSED BY — Municipality of Rotterdam

architecture + context

OWNER OF THE SITE — Public and private ownership

LOCATION — Rotterdam, Groot IJsselmonde

POST-COMPETITION PHASE — Design (or research-by-design)

POPULATION — 650,000 inhab.

assignment on implementation on the project site (or a site with

STRATEGIC SITE — 125 ha

similar characteristics) commissioned by the municipality of

PROJECT SITE — 6.7 ha

Rotterdam and/or private partners

Europan Nederland — 1. WHAT ARE THE GOALS OF THE SITE MUTATION?

Groot IJsselmonde in the south of Rotterdam is an archetype of a post-war neighbourhood built in the early 1960s. It is green, watery, spacious and easily accessible by car and public transport. The central area is typical in its paradoxical combination of low vitality, rather outdated communal services, and the presence of a wellconnected but currently underused public transport hub. The project site is next to, and could become part of the central area and consists of a large open green space and a couple of small-scale building blocks. The challenge is to develop a spatial strategy implementing a new mix of functions on site to revitalize the local economy, while rethinking the role of a suburban landscape, communal facilities in a central area, and other characteristics of the post-war neighbourhood philosophy in the perspective of the 21st century. 2. HOW CAN THE SITE BE INTEGRATED IN THE ISSUES OF PRODUCTIVE CITIES? HOW DO YOU CONSIDER THE PRODUCTIVITY ISSUE?

The City of Rotterdam seeks opportunities in the combination of 202

accommodating its growth and reactivating urban life in peripheral post-war neighbourhoods. The aim is to attract and retain residents, in particular young generations, to improve the socioeconomic status, to diversify the composition of population and to stimulate healthy and productive suburban living. Densification is part of the city’s strategy, but to make Groot IJsselmonde 21st century proof a new mix of functions is crucial to spark productive interaction milieus and to create social anchors for the next economy. The City of Rotterdam believes that the resurgence of the central area is key to setting this transition in motion. 3. HAVE YOU ALREADY DEFINED A SPECIFIC PROCESS FOR THE URBAN AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE AFTER EUROPAN COMPETITION?

Characteristic of Rotterdam is the credo “making city together”. Municipality, market parties, corporations and other enthusiastic city makers are working together to build a productive, inclusive, healthy, circular and compact city. In order to put their money where their mouth is, the parties involved are now trying to actually bring the rich harvest of Europan 15 one step closer to realization, together with the winning teams. To this end, a workshop programme is established, in which thinking and doing go hand in hand. First leading questions for Groot IJsselmonde: The solutions being tested at Groot IJsselmonde on the level of development strategy, densification, public space and mix of functions could help to tackle issues on other similar places. To unlock the real potential of this neighbourhood, getting to know the place through the eyes of local residents, entrepreneurs and other stakeholders is an important step. With multiple activities and creative interventions, we aim to create a strong network and to move forward collectively.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Rotterdam Groot IJsselmonde (NL

5min
pages 204-207

Pays de Dreux (FR

5min
pages 200-202

Special Mention – A(gri)puncture

0
page 203

Oliva (ES

7min
pages 194-199

Innsbruck (AT

4min
pages 190-193

Selb (DE

4min
pages 180-185

Rotterdam Brainpark I (NL

4min
pages 176-177

Types and Fields Julio de la Fuente (ES), Architect and urbanist

9min
pages 186-189

Romainville (FR

1min
page 172

Special Mention – Building upon Brainpark Special Mention – Elegy for the Office Park

1min
pages 178-179

Halmstad (SE

5min
pages 168-171

Floirac (FR

5min
pages 164-167

Casar de Cáceres (ES

5min
pages 160-162

Connectors and Enablers Blaž Babnik Romaniuk (SI), Architect

10min
pages 150-155

Auby (FR

5min
pages 156-159

Villach (AT

6min
pages 144-149

Special Mention – The Shape of Water

0
page 143

Winner – N.E.W (New Era Wharf

3min
pages 133-135

Sant Climent de Llobregat (ES

5min
pages 140-142

Rødberg (NO

1min
page 132

Winner – Common Node

12min
pages 123-131

Lasarte-Oria (ES

2min
page 122

La Louvière (BE

3min
pages 120-121

Third Space as Transitional Agent Socrates Stratis (CY), PhD in Architecture, urbanist and associate professor

13min
pages 110-115

Warszawa (PL

6min
pages 104-109

Hyvinkää (FI

6min
pages 116-119

et le bégonia Special Mention – Be Kind, Rewild

0
page 103

Rochefort Océan (FR

2min
page 100

Special Mention – Reveal the City: the Telhu’Halle

0
page 99

Runner-Up – La ville école

1min
page 98

Winner – Boîtes à secrets

1min
page 97

Port-Jérôme-sur-Seine (FR

1min
page 96

Special Mention – Up-CyclinGravina

1min
page 95

The Fantastic Forest Phenomenon Runner-Up – Open City

1min
pages 90-91

Winner

1min
page 89

Laterza (IT

2min
page 92

Runner-Up – LA3: a Productive Square

1min
page 94

Karlovac (HR

2min
page 88

Runner-Up – Of Cycles and Streams

1min
page 86

Graz (AT

2min
page 84

Runner-Up – Painting Greyfields

1min
page 82

Special Mention – Carsid sur la Sàmbre Special Mention – Matière savante

1min
pages 78-79

Enköping (SE

1min
page 80

Runner-Up – Forging the Fallow

1min
page 77

Charleroi (BE

1min
page 76

Definitions of Circularity Carlos Arroyo (ES), architect, urbanist, linguist, teacher

11min
pages 70-75

Runner-Up – Weiz Archipelago

1min
pages 66-69

Weiz (AT

2min
page 64

Winner – Learning from the Future

1min
page 65

Winner – Makers’ Maze

1min
page 57

Täby (SE

1min
page 60

Rotterdam Vierhavensblok (NL

2min
page 56

Special Mention – Den Gröna Kilen

0
page 63

Special Mention – A Moment Apart

1min
page 55

Runner-Up – MOVEnIN

1min
page 54

Winner – Soft Buffers

1min
page 53

Nin (HR

1min
page 52

Marseille (FR

2min
page 48

Runner-Up – 43°20’3’’N 5°21’39’’E

1min
page 49

Winner – Radical Reimagining

1min
pages 46-47

Guovdageaidnu (NO

1min
page 44

Runner-Up – Stamping Ground

1min
page 42

Special Mention – Verdoyer, cultiver, hybrider

0
page 43

Champigny-sur-marne (FR

2min
page 40

Winner – Lost Highway

1min
page 41

Learning to Multiply Miriam García García (ES), PhD in Architecture, landscape architect & urban designer

15min
pages 30-35

Borås (SE

2min
page 36

Winner – Made in Borås

1min
page 37

E15 Juries Presentation

8min
pages 14-21

Special Mention – Re:Mediate

0
page 39

Preface Anna Catasta, President of Europan

8min
pages 3-5

Towards Regenerative Eco-Productive Milieus Didier Rebois (FR), architect, teacher and Secretary General of Europan + Chris Younès (FR), anthro-philosopher, researcher and professor

12min
pages 22-29

How are Europan projects assessed?

13min
pages 10-13
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.