PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP. Source: Author based on the SUMP SAT Results

Therefore, the overall SUMP SAT results present a below-average mobility planning process

as expected and mentioned before

since most of the SUMP

principles have achieved percentages below 60%. However, in a transition situation, MOVE helped reveal more challenges regarding the SUMP adoption. For instance, the lowest rate has been associated with the 3rd principle,

related to the

participatory approach, which should happen from the beginning of the SUMP cycle until the end. However, MOVE shares the vision exclusively of the Lisbon City Council executive; this is a point for it to consider for proposing the SUMP later since, according to the SUMP guidelines, this principle is essential for people to feel ownership of the SUMP and the policies it fosters. Failing to involve citizens and stakeholders along the process could prejudice the long-term success of the SUMPing since public support would be compromised. Further, the 7th principle,

has

received the second low rate since MOVE has not entered into details as a strategic and outline the

session.

118 Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

3min

pages 137-138

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

2min

pages 133-134

Activities

PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

Activities

Figure 74

Figure 73

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 69

Figure 70

Figure 68

Figure 65

Figure 64

Figure 63. Universal Accessibility, the unifying concept of PUMS

Figure 60

Figure 61

Figure 59. Budapest BMT Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 58

Figure 57

Figure 56

Figure 50

Figure 55

two phases

of intervention

Figure 47

Figure 45

network

Figure 44

during the April 2017 forum

originally in French, as la perception de la mobilité et de la sécurité routière

Figure 43

Figure 41

Figure 40. Vienna STEP UMP Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 38. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 3 analyses

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses

Figure 33. Structure of Chapter 4

Figure 37

Table 5

Figure 36

Figure 31. Coding guide based on SUMP 12 Steps elements

Figure

transport modes

and stations from their bike-sharing systems and cycling infrastructure kilometers

Figure 24. Lisbon Modal Split 2017

Figure 23

Figure 22. Lisbon location and statistics

Figure 21. Rome Modal Split 2016

Figure 20

Figure 19. Rome location and statistics

Figure 18. Budapest Modal Split 2017

Figure 16. Budapest location and statistics

Figure 15. Brussels Capital Region Modal Split 2019

Figure 11

Figure

Figure

Figure 4. The 12 Steps of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Figure 10. Vienna location and statistics

Table 3. Short Table

Figure 1. Research Structure

Table

17 Figure 6. eir Mobility/Transport Plans to be SUMPs

Plans

Figure

Table 1. Paradigms of academic knowledge about urban transport Table 2. Differences between traditional transport planning and Sustainable Urban