PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP. Source: Author based on the SUMP SAT Analyses Results

In summary, Brussels, Budapest, and Rome have presented similar performances related to their strategic documents. However, Budapest has not presented many details about its planning process, which led to a more significant difference in results on the 3rd principle compared to the other two cases. In the case of Vienna, which is well-known for many achievements in the mobility sector and based on the state of the art presented in this thesis, the city probably has the higher mobility performance among the five cases. Although, based on the analyses of mobility planning processes, the results show a different picture than the others. One possible reason behind this is the year of the

2013. Hence, as it was a very recent concept

and remains new until nowadays

it could

justify its performance compared to the most recent plans. Lastly, as explained before, Lisbon has not performed well, although it illustrates a transition scenario, making the challenges behind the SUMP Principles more visible for this research. As a result, the most critical princi been, for instance,

st

rd

.

th

. Define a long-term vision and a clear implementation

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms 123

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

3min

pages 137-138

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

2min

pages 133-134

Activities

PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

Activities

Figure 74

Figure 73

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 69

Figure 70

Figure 68

Figure 65

Figure 64

Figure 63. Universal Accessibility, the unifying concept of PUMS

Figure 60

Figure 61

Figure 59. Budapest BMT Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 58

Figure 57

Figure 56

Figure 50

Figure 55

two phases

of intervention

Figure 47

Figure 45

network

Figure 44

during the April 2017 forum

originally in French, as la perception de la mobilité et de la sécurité routière

Figure 43

Figure 41

Figure 40. Vienna STEP UMP Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 38. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 3 analyses

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses

Figure 33. Structure of Chapter 4

Figure 37

Table 5

Figure 36

Figure 31. Coding guide based on SUMP 12 Steps elements

Figure

transport modes

and stations from their bike-sharing systems and cycling infrastructure kilometers

Figure 24. Lisbon Modal Split 2017

Figure 23

Figure 22. Lisbon location and statistics

Figure 21. Rome Modal Split 2016

Figure 20

Figure 19. Rome location and statistics

Figure 18. Budapest Modal Split 2017

Figure 16. Budapest location and statistics

Figure 15. Brussels Capital Region Modal Split 2019

Figure 11

Figure

Figure

Figure 4. The 12 Steps of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Figure 10. Vienna location and statistics

Table 3. Short Table

Figure 1. Research Structure

Table

17 Figure 6. eir Mobility/Transport Plans to be SUMPs

Plans

Figure

Table 1. Paradigms of academic knowledge about urban transport Table 2. Differences between traditional transport planning and Sustainable Urban