PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A

Figure 23. Lisbon s Transport Modes in Numbers. Source: Author based on data from ACAP (2022); Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (2021); Carris (2020); EMEL (2022); Metro Lisboa (2022); TML (2022)

In addition, the city also offers a bike-sharing system (Gira) with 1,300 bikes (among conventional and also electric options ones) which can be rented in 116 stations spread through the city (Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, 2021; EMEL, 2022). In addition, the capital of Portugal has been growing its bike infrastructure over the years; nowadays, the city provides approximately 150km to its community and has plans to increase it even more (Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, 2021). In contrast, Lisbon has a history of a high PV fleet; in 2019, there were 1,702,097 in total (1,596,752 related to cars and 105,345 related to motorcycles), which culminated in a motorization rate of 748 vehicles per 1,000 inhabitants (ACAP, 2022). Additionally, it is essential to mention that the author has contacted by email and asked the public bodies for the numbers related only to Lisbon, city-scale; however, all numbers given were related to the district level. Under the considerations expressed so far, mobility in Lisbon has recently started changing its fragmented context toward a more holistic one, where mobility has been in a more integrated set of measures and actions in favor of a bigger picture. Moreover, similar to previous case cities, Lisbon has been among the finalists of the European Mobility Week award in 2015 and 2016 and has won it in 2018 due to some significant cycling initiatives and incentives for multimodality (EUROPEANMOBILITYWEEK, 2022b). After all, to close the last selected case city, Figure 24 shows Lisbon modal split from 2017. The total percentage of displacements among PT, bicycle, and walking is 52%, and the goal to be reached by

-

documents analyzed in this study

selected as one of the is 66% against 34% associated with private vehicles

40 Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

3min

pages 137-138

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

2min

pages 133-134

Activities

PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

Activities

Figure 74

Figure 73

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 69

Figure 70

Figure 68

Figure 65

Figure 64

Figure 63. Universal Accessibility, the unifying concept of PUMS

Figure 60

Figure 61

Figure 59. Budapest BMT Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 58

Figure 57

Figure 56

Figure 50

Figure 55

two phases

of intervention

Figure 47

Figure 45

network

Figure 44

during the April 2017 forum

originally in French, as la perception de la mobilité et de la sécurité routière

Figure 43

Figure 41

Figure 40. Vienna STEP UMP Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 38. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 3 analyses

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses

Figure 33. Structure of Chapter 4

Figure 37

Table 5

Figure 36

Figure 31. Coding guide based on SUMP 12 Steps elements

Figure

transport modes

and stations from their bike-sharing systems and cycling infrastructure kilometers

Figure 24. Lisbon Modal Split 2017

Figure 23

Figure 22. Lisbon location and statistics

Figure 21. Rome Modal Split 2016

Figure 20

Figure 19. Rome location and statistics

Figure 18. Budapest Modal Split 2017

Figure 16. Budapest location and statistics

Figure 15. Brussels Capital Region Modal Split 2019

Figure 11

Figure

Figure

Figure 4. The 12 Steps of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Figure 10. Vienna location and statistics

Table 3. Short Table

Figure 1. Research Structure

Table

17 Figure 6. eir Mobility/Transport Plans to be SUMPs

Plans

Figure

Table 1. Paradigms of academic knowledge about urban transport Table 2. Differences between traditional transport planning and Sustainable Urban