PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A Step 3 analyze mobility situation: STEP UMP has presented most of the analyses before the proposed actions in the second part of the document. It has addressed the perspective of all transport modes and other significant sustainable elements. For instance, in action 19

further development of bike-sharing systems

first, it has been presented some

study facts: In 2014 (as at February), Vienna had 116 city bike stations with roughly 2,600 slots. They cover about 12% of the urban area (for comparison: the rate is 78% in Lyon, France). The average distance between stations in Vienna is 700m (compared with 300 m in Paris). The number of stations within a 2 km radius is about 22 in Vienna (whereas it is 123 in Paris). In 2012, the average number of trips per bike and day in Vienna was 1.6 (Barcelona: 7.4). (Vienna City Administration, 2014a, p. 65)

Then, afterward, STEP UMP reinforced its desire to maintain and expand the bike-sharing systems, followed by showing measures to be carried out on local and regional scales. Therefore, Figure 36 summarizes the STEP UMP analyses from SUMP Cycle Phase 1, where seven activities have been covered, and three others have stayed unclear.

Figure 36. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP s Phase 1 analyses. Source: Author

Although the plan has presented the current mobility situation was reinforcing how Vienna is performing well

which most of the time

concluding the milestone of the first

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms 55

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

3min

pages 137-138

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

2min

pages 133-134

Activities

PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

Activities

Figure 74

Figure 73

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 69

Figure 70

Figure 68

Figure 65

Figure 64

Figure 63. Universal Accessibility, the unifying concept of PUMS

Figure 60

Figure 61

Figure 59. Budapest BMT Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 58

Figure 57

Figure 56

Figure 50

Figure 55

two phases

of intervention

Figure 47

Figure 45

network

Figure 44

during the April 2017 forum

originally in French, as la perception de la mobilité et de la sécurité routière

Figure 43

Figure 41

Figure 40. Vienna STEP UMP Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 38. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 3 analyses

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses

Figure 33. Structure of Chapter 4

Figure 37

Table 5

Figure 36

Figure 31. Coding guide based on SUMP 12 Steps elements

Figure

transport modes

and stations from their bike-sharing systems and cycling infrastructure kilometers

Figure 24. Lisbon Modal Split 2017

Figure 23

Figure 22. Lisbon location and statistics

Figure 21. Rome Modal Split 2016

Figure 20

Figure 19. Rome location and statistics

Figure 18. Budapest Modal Split 2017

Figure 16. Budapest location and statistics

Figure 15. Brussels Capital Region Modal Split 2019

Figure 11

Figure

Figure

Figure 4. The 12 Steps of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Figure 10. Vienna location and statistics

Table 3. Short Table

Figure 1. Research Structure

Table

17 Figure 6. eir Mobility/Transport Plans to be SUMPs

Plans

Figure

Table 1. Paradigms of academic knowledge about urban transport Table 2. Differences between traditional transport planning and Sustainable Urban