PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A

Figure 37. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP s Phase 2 analyses. Source: Author

Thus, even completing the second phase milestone cycle

reaching the middle of the SUMP

this open target could compromise the monitoring progress (Phase 4) since it is

unclear how much the plan expects to achieve. For instance, if it rises or declines just a little, it could be considered to have reached its goals, even if that would not mean much progress. Hence, this could be a point to be improved for the following plans. 4.1.3. Phase 3 | Measure Planning The STEP UMP has presented its measuring plan mainly in the second part, divided into nine chapters,

Space:

Organization lity n Furthermore, as earlier stated in Chapter 2 (Figure 4), the SUMP cycle Phase 3, Measure Planning, also has three steps, which summary analyses results have been shown below. Step 7

select measure packages with stakeholders: STEP UMP has not shared much

information regarding the assessment of long lists of measures by the SUMP guidelines

recommended activity

that possibly have been done before the selection of the 50

ones presented in the document. Nevertheless, it does not mean that this activity did not occur, but rather that it might not have been published in the final paper since some lists of measures have not been selected for the shortlist

a similar assumption to Step 4.

Although, it is essential to highlight that according to Figure 35, stakeholders have been very involved in the measures process, which is a positive outcome for this step. Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms 59

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

3min

pages 137-138

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

2min

pages 133-134

Activities

PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

Activities

Figure 74

Figure 73

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 69

Figure 70

Figure 68

Figure 65

Figure 64

Figure 63. Universal Accessibility, the unifying concept of PUMS

Figure 60

Figure 61

Figure 59. Budapest BMT Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 58

Figure 57

Figure 56

Figure 50

Figure 55

two phases

of intervention

Figure 47

Figure 45

network

Figure 44

during the April 2017 forum

originally in French, as la perception de la mobilité et de la sécurité routière

Figure 43

Figure 41

Figure 40. Vienna STEP UMP Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 38. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 3 analyses

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses

Figure 33. Structure of Chapter 4

Figure 37

Table 5

Figure 36

Figure 31. Coding guide based on SUMP 12 Steps elements

Figure

transport modes

and stations from their bike-sharing systems and cycling infrastructure kilometers

Figure 24. Lisbon Modal Split 2017

Figure 23

Figure 22. Lisbon location and statistics

Figure 21. Rome Modal Split 2016

Figure 20

Figure 19. Rome location and statistics

Figure 18. Budapest Modal Split 2017

Figure 16. Budapest location and statistics

Figure 15. Brussels Capital Region Modal Split 2019

Figure 11

Figure

Figure

Figure 4. The 12 Steps of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Figure 10. Vienna location and statistics

Table 3. Short Table

Figure 1. Research Structure

Table

17 Figure 6. eir Mobility/Transport Plans to be SUMPs

Plans

Figure

Table 1. Paradigms of academic knowledge about urban transport Table 2. Differences between traditional transport planning and Sustainable Urban