PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A mentioned by the plan was the Vienna Play Street model traffic and opened up to children in the afternoon

sections of streets closed to

which has been implemented in many

districts and is planned to expand, especially in consolidated areas where there is hardly any open spaces. However, most of the results shared have been related to successes, not failures, which are also part of the evolution process. Hence, Vienna should also contemplate its failures in updating the following plans since not everything ended up exactly as planned, and many lessons could be learned from those. Therefore, Figure 39 displays the summary of the STEP UMP analyses from SUMP Cycle Phase 4, in which only one activity has been covered, four others have been partially covered, and two others have remained unclear.

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses. Source: Author

fourth and last milestone measure implementation evaluated

but also the beginning of a new cycle. Thus, it is

well known that Vienna has been achieving many outstanding results. However, as

failures, consequently addressing new challenges and possible solutions in the following planning process to achieve even better future results. 4.1.5. Principles of SUMP After scrutinizing STEP UMP throughout the SUMP Cycle, this research has enhanced the analyses by employing the online SUMP Self-Assessment Tool to evaluate to what extent the Viennese strategic mobility document is fulfilling the SUMP Principles. The overview

64 Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

3min

pages 137-138

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

2min

pages 133-134

Activities

PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

Activities

Figure 74

Figure 73

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 69

Figure 70

Figure 68

Figure 65

Figure 64

Figure 63. Universal Accessibility, the unifying concept of PUMS

Figure 60

Figure 61

Figure 59. Budapest BMT Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 58

Figure 57

Figure 56

Figure 50

Figure 55

two phases

of intervention

Figure 47

Figure 45

network

Figure 44

during the April 2017 forum

originally in French, as la perception de la mobilité et de la sécurité routière

Figure 43

Figure 41

Figure 40. Vienna STEP UMP Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 38. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 3 analyses

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses

Figure 33. Structure of Chapter 4

Figure 37

Table 5

Figure 36

Figure 31. Coding guide based on SUMP 12 Steps elements

Figure

transport modes

and stations from their bike-sharing systems and cycling infrastructure kilometers

Figure 24. Lisbon Modal Split 2017

Figure 23

Figure 22. Lisbon location and statistics

Figure 21. Rome Modal Split 2016

Figure 20

Figure 19. Rome location and statistics

Figure 18. Budapest Modal Split 2017

Figure 16. Budapest location and statistics

Figure 15. Brussels Capital Region Modal Split 2019

Figure 11

Figure

Figure

Figure 4. The 12 Steps of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Figure 10. Vienna location and statistics

Table 3. Short Table

Figure 1. Research Structure

Table

17 Figure 6. eir Mobility/Transport Plans to be SUMPs

Plans

Figure

Table 1. Paradigms of academic knowledge about urban transport Table 2. Differences between traditional transport planning and Sustainable Urban