PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A English, The Orientation Phase). As a result, it could be said that GM has ensured political and institutional ownership.

Figure 42.

ctors and Stakeholders that contributed to the vision development during the April 2017 forum. Source: Bruxelles Mobilité (2020b)

Although GM managed to have a clear picture of strengths, weaknesses, and possible future improvements based on its previous planning practices, the financial resources that were available for its plan development have not been clear. Likewise, the evaluation of human capacities was also unclear. Hence, the lack of information could compromise the success of the plan.

Step 2

determine planning framework: GM has defined its geographic scope by the

Brussels-Capital Region. In addition, GM has also linked with other planning processes, i.e. the

(PCM

PRDD; the

in English, the Municipal Mobility Plans); the (PRAS

Plan); the

(PAD PRAS

Development Plans); the

(PRPS

the Regional Parking Policy Plan); the in English, the Municipal Parking Action Plans); the -Climat-

in English, the Master

(in English, the Regional Urban

Planning Regulations); the

Plan); the

in English, the Regional Land Use

in English, (PACS

(in English, the Noise

(in English, the Air-Climate-Energy Plan); the

(in English, the Innovation Plan); the

(in English,

68 Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms