Alcantara, M.N.P.A lack of ownership and adherence to the Iris II Plan has been emphasized, as well as a need for greater coherence and cross-functionality in the actions proposed (Bruxelles Mobilité, 2020b). Therefore, Figure 43 recaps the GM analyses from SUMP Cycle Phase 1, where eight activities have been covered, one partially covered, and another has remained unclear.
Figure 43. Overview of Brussels
Phase 1 analyses. Source: Author
Although the plan has presented an outstanding outline of the current mobility situation which even has addressed some gaps that need to be fulfilled
concluding the
milestone of the first phase, it lacks more details related to their planned timeline and its real application to the plan development. In addition, for the following plans, it is necessary to clarify the preliminary evaluations related to human and financial resources to avoid compromising the success of the plan s development. 4.2.2. Phase 2 | Strategy Development GM has shown details of its strategy process in the
(in
English, The Strategic component). Therefore, the steps from the SUMP cycle Phase 2 (Strategy Development) have been explored in the analyses below.
70 Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms