PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Alcantara, M.N.P.A Convergence Phase) to guarantee their operability areas

especially in the cross-cutting

and also provide transparency around the planned actions, which also contributes

to assuring political and public support, as suggested by the SUMP guidelines. Step 9 prepare for adoption and financing: GM has allocated budget information in each action, apart from also presenting a chapter dedicated to budgetary information, which is called

(in English, Budgetary

and human resources reflecting the ambitions). This chapter has explained some technical information regarding budgetary reallocations and funding sources. In addition, it has also shared the main budgets regarding the settlements from 2017. Further, to conclude this Step and ensure t

the (in English, The Public Inquiry) about the draft document that

happened for four months in 2019. Moreover, an extensive communication system has been organized with presentations, press articles, poster campaigns, social media, temporary exhibitions, and emblematic events. In the end, there were a total of 40 meetings, including 22 at the core of the municipalities, which enabled participants to discuss the draft plan directly. Thence, the last activity has also been successful, and Figure 47 compiles the GM analyses from SUMP Cycle Phase 3, where all activities have been covered.

Figure 47. Overview of Brussels

Phase 3 analyses. Source: Author

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans [SUMPs] and the transition behind planning paradigms 77

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

3min

pages 137-138

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

2min

pages 133-134

Activities

PoliMi Master Thesis | SUMPS AND THE TRANSITION BEHIND PLANNING PARADIGMS

Articles inside

6. Conclusions

Figure 78. Case Studies Comparison Results - Principles of SUMP

Activities

Figure 74

Figure 73

Figure 75. Lisbon MOVE Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 69

Figure 70

Figure 68

Figure 65

Figure 64

Figure 63. Universal Accessibility, the unifying concept of PUMS

Figure 60

Figure 61

Figure 59. Budapest BMT Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 58

Figure 57

Figure 56

Figure 50

Figure 55

two phases

of intervention

Figure 47

Figure 45

network

Figure 44

during the April 2017 forum

originally in French, as la perception de la mobilité et de la sécurité routière

Figure 43

Figure 41

Figure 40. Vienna STEP UMP Results - Principles of SUMP

Figure 38. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 3 analyses

Figure 39. Overview of Vienna STEP UMP's Phase 4 analyses

Figure 33. Structure of Chapter 4

Figure 37

Table 5

Figure 36

Figure 31. Coding guide based on SUMP 12 Steps elements

Figure

transport modes

and stations from their bike-sharing systems and cycling infrastructure kilometers

Figure 24. Lisbon Modal Split 2017

Figure 23

Figure 22. Lisbon location and statistics

Figure 21. Rome Modal Split 2016

Figure 20

Figure 19. Rome location and statistics

Figure 18. Budapest Modal Split 2017

Figure 16. Budapest location and statistics

Figure 15. Brussels Capital Region Modal Split 2019

Figure 11

Figure

Figure

Figure 4. The 12 Steps of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Figure 10. Vienna location and statistics

Table 3. Short Table

Figure 1. Research Structure

Table

17 Figure 6. eir Mobility/Transport Plans to be SUMPs

Plans

Figure

Table 1. Paradigms of academic knowledge about urban transport Table 2. Differences between traditional transport planning and Sustainable Urban